PHENOL

PHENOL
CASRN: 108-95-2
http://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/cgi-bin/sis/search/f?./temp/~AAAcpaq6n:37

Human Health Effects:

Toxicity Summary:

HUMAN TOXICITY: Phenol is toxic with a probable oral lethal dose to humans of 50-500 mg/kg. Some individuals may be hypersensitive with lethality or serious effects at very low exposures. Rapid absorption and severe systemic toxicity can occur after any route of exposure including skin. Death and severe toxicity are usually due to effects on the CNS, heart, blood vessels, lung, and kidneys. However, toxic manifestations may vary somewhat with the route. Observed effects from acute exposure may include: shock, delirium, coma, pulmonary distress, phenolic breath, scanty/dark urine, and death. Protracted or chronic exposure usually results in major damage to the liver, kidneys and eyes. Pigmentary changes of the skin have been noted. Consumption of water contaminated with phenol resulted in diarrhea, mouth sores, burning of the mouth, and dark urine. Phenol is highly caustic to tissues. Skin exposure results in pain, then numbness, blanching, severe burns, and eschar formation. Ingestion leads to burning of throat and severe gastrointestinal inflammation. Inhalation can result in pulmonary irritation and edema. ANIMAL TOXICITY: Toxicity in animals is similar to that of humans, although additional effects have been observed. LD50's in animals range from 250-500 mg/kg, differing very little with route of exposure or species, except for the cat which is unusually susceptible with an oral lethal dose of 80 mg/kg. Additional reported toxic effects include irritation and corrosivity of skin and eyes in rabbits, induction of skin tumors in mice, reproductive effects in rats, and mutagenicity with Salmonella, E coli and Drosophila. Phenol is also highly toxic to aquatic life and frogs. METABOLISM: Phenol is metabolized and excreted principally by the kidneys as the sulfate or glucuronide, although some phenol may be excreted unchanged, especially at high doses. Other reported metabolites include hydroquinone, other quinones and catechols.
**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Evidence for Carcinogenicity:

Evaluation: There is inadequate evidence in humans for the carcinogenicity of phenol. There is inadequate evidence in experimental animals for the carcinogenicity of phenol. Overall evaluation: Phenol is not classifiable as to its carcinogenicity to humans (Group 3).
[IARC. Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Man. Geneva: World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer,1972-PRESENT. (Multivolume work).,p. 71 762 (1999)]**PEER REVIEWED**

CLASSIFICATION: D; not classifiable as to human carcinogenicity. BASIS FOR CLASSIFICATION: Based on no human carcinogenicity data and inadequate animal data. HUMAN CARCINOGENICITY DATA: None. ANIMAL CARCINOGENICITY DATA: Inadequate.
[U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) on Phenol (108-95-2) Available from: http://www.epa.gov/ngispgm3/iris on the Substance File List as of March 15, 2000]**PEER REVIEWED**

A4. A4= Not classifiable as a human carcinogen.
[American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. TLVs and BEIs. Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices. Cincinnati, OH. 2000. 55]**QC REVIEWED**

 

Human Toxicity Excerpts:

Oral ingestion can result in mucocutaneous and gastrointestinal corrosion. Both oral ingestion and extensive application to the skin can cause systemic toxicity manifested by transient CNS stimulation followed by CNS and cardiovascular depression; death may result.
[Gilman, A.G., L.S.Goodman, and A. Gilman. (eds.). Goodman and Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. 7th ed. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc., 1985. 970]**PEER REVIEWED**

CHRONIC SYSTEMIC ABSORPTION OF PHENOL HAS CAUSED GRAY COLORATION OF THE SCLERA WITH BROWN SPOTS NEAR THE INSERTION OF RECTUS MUSCLE TENDONS, ASSOCIATED WITH BLUE OR BROWN DISCOLORATION OF THE TENDONS OVER THE KNUCKLES OF THE HANDS. THIS IS A FORM OF OCHRONOSIS, KNOWN AS CARBOLOCHRONOSIS, OF WHICH 20 CASES ... /WERE REPORTED/ UP TO 1942 ... .
[Grant, W.M. Toxicology of the Eye. 3rd ed. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas Publisher, 1986. 720]**PEER REVIEWED**

SYMPTOMATOLOGY: 1. Burning pain in mouth and throat. White necrotic lesions in mouth, esophagus and stomach. Abdominal pain, vomiting ... and bloody diarrhea. 2. Pallor, sweating, weakness, headache, dizziness, tinnitus. 3. Shock: Weak irregular pulse, hypotension, shallow respirations, cyanosis, pallor, and a profound fall in body temperature. 4. Possibly fleeting excitement and confusion, followed by unconsciousness ... 5. Stentorous breathing, mucous rales, rhonchi, frothing at nose and mouth and other signs of pulmonary edema are sometimes seen. Characteristic odor of phenol on the breath. 6. Scanty, dark-colored ... urine ... moderately severe renal insufficiency may appear. 7. Methemoglobinemia, Heinz body hemolytic anemia and hyperbilirubinemia have been reported ... 8. Death from respiratory, circulatory or cardiac failure. 9. If spilled on skin, pain is followed promptly by numbness. The skin becomes blanched, and a dry opaque eschar forms over the burn. When the eschar sloughs off, a brown stain remains.
[Gosselin, R.E., R.P. Smith, H.C. Hodge. Clinical Toxicology of Commercial Products. 5th ed. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1984.,p. III-346]**PEER REVIEWED**

The predominant acute action of a toxic dose in man appears to be to the central nervous system, leading to sudden collapse and unconsciousness.
[USEPA; Ambient Water Quality Criteria Document: Phenol p.C-20 (1980) EPA 440/5-80-066]**PEER REVIEWED**

A 19 yr old female ingested 15 ml of phenol and complained of severe nausea, burning in the throat, and epigastrium. Laryngoscopic examination revealed superficial burns and slight edema of the hypopharynx. Despite gastric lavage with olive oil and intravenous saline administration, she continued to be nauseated. One hr later she began to vomit blood and to have diarrhea, passing copious amounts of blood with clots. She gradually became cyanotic and stuporous. Her blood pressure decreased markedly and her extremities became cold. She experienced periods of relapse and recovery during treatment but died 17.5 hr after ingestion.
[Bennett IL; Ann Intern Med 32: 324-7 (1950)]**PEER REVIEWED**

A woman committed suicide by ingesting 10-20 g of phenol. She became comatose with partial absence of reflexes, pallor of the skin, accelerated respiration, weak and rapid pulse, and dilated pupils which did not react to light. Almost one hour after the ingestion, her heart and respiration stopped and, in spite of repeated attempts at resuscitation for two hours, she died. Autopsy revealed marked hyperemia of the tracheal and bronchial mucous membranes. Histologic examination revealed pulmonary and liver edema as well as hyperemia of the intestines.
[Stajduhar-Caric Z; J Forensic Med 15: 41-2 (1968)]**PEER REVIEWED**

An industrial employee spraying weeds with effluent of a chemical plant, containing 43% phenol, 20% water, 14% cresols, 11.5% low-boiling organics, and 11% high-boiling organics suffered burns on thighs and genitalia. The affected sites were washed with large amounts of warm water (30 min) followed by ethanol (10 min). Washing and scrubbing were repeated. Within 30 minutes the employee developed symptoms of shock. Reduced body temperature, weak and irregular pulse, accelerated respiratory rate, stertorous breathing, and constricted pupils which showed a slow response to light and slow accommodation. His left leg had convulsive movements for 30 minutes. Tests for a liver function were normal. Urine was not analyzed for phenol until 4 days after exposure at which time it was negative. Recovery was complete and the patient was released 7 days later from the hospital.
[Evans SJ; Br J Ind Med 9: 227-9 (1952) as cited in NIOSH; Criteria Document: Phenol p.830-833 (1976) DHEW Pub. NIOSH 76-196]**PEER REVIEWED**

An employee accidentally spilled 4-5 liters of 78% aqueous phenol on himself. Following immediate irrigation with alcohol, he exhibited superficial skin burns, became comatose and died shortly thereafter.
[Duverneuil G, Ravier E; Arch Mal Prof 23: 830-3 (1962) as cited in NIOSH; Criteria Document: Phenol p.41 (1976) DHEW Pub NIOSH 76-196]**PEER REVIEWED**

Earlier investigators reported certain signs and symptoms not found in more recent reports including abortion, acquired ochronosis, difficulty in swallowing, and tinnitus.
[NIOSH; Criteria Document: Phenol p.29 (1976) DHEW Pub. NIOSH 76-196]**PEER REVIEWED**

Fatal neonatal hyperbilirubinemia from inhalation of phenolic vapors has occurred in poorly ventilated nurseries in which phenol was used to disinfect mattresses and bassinets.
[Gilman, A.G., L.S.Goodman, and A. Gilman. (eds.). Goodman and Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. 7th ed. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc., 1985. 970]**PEER REVIEWED**

On human eyes, concn phenol has had severe effects ... rendering the conjunctiva chemotic, and the cornea white and hypesthetic. The lids have become edematous. ... Severe iritis ... in at least one case. Visual results have been varied from complete recovery ... to blindness and loss of one eye.
[Grant, W.M. Toxicology of the Eye. 3rd ed. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas Publisher, 1986. 720]**PEER REVIEWED**

... A 32 yr old male ... spilled a solution of phenol over his scalp, face, neck, shoulders and back. The victim died 10 min later. There was coagulation necrosis of the skin and left eye and acute dermatitis veneta with acute passive congestion of the lungs, liver, spleen, and kidneys.
[American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Inc. Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices. 6th ed. Volumes I,II, III. Cincinnati, OH: ACGIH, 1991. 1206]**PEER REVIEWED**

... 1 ounce of 89% phenol was mistakenly given in a measured container to an outpatient. ... The patient immediately ... collapsed. Within 30 min she had an unrecordable blood pressure and sustained respiratory arrest. ... The patient experienced ventricular tachycardia 1 hr post-ingestion, and resuscitation was effected ... over first 24 hr ... ventricular arrhythmias, seizures, and metabolic acidosis. ... Subsequent esophagitis and gastrointestinal bleeding occurred. The patient survived. ...
[Haddad, L.M. and Winchester, J.F. Clinical Management of Poisoning and Drug Overdosage. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders Co., 1983. 810]**PEER REVIEWED**

Toxic blood level (the concn of drug or chemical present in the blood that is associated with serious toxic symptoms in humans): 9 mg%; Lethal blood level (the concn of chemical present in blood that has been reported to cause death, or is so far above reported therapeutic or toxic concn that one can judge that it might cause death in humans): 90 u/ml /Table/
[Winek, C.L. Drug and Chemical Blood-Level Data 1985. Pittsburgh, PA: Allied Fischer Scientific, 1985.]**PEER REVIEWED**

Application of moderate amounts to the skin causes epidermal separation and a severe exposure causes necrosis.
[Gilman, A.G., L.S.Goodman, and A. Gilman. (eds.). Goodman and Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. 7th ed. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc., 1985. 969]**PEER REVIEWED**

Undiluted /phenol/ cauterizes and whitens the skin and mucous membranes.
[Osol, A. (ed.). Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences. 16th ed. Easton, Pennsylvania: Mack Publishing Co., 1980. 1263]**PEER REVIEWED**

PHENOL ... EMPLOYED IN VAGINAL DOUCHE HAS CAUSED LOCAL & SYSTEMIC POISONING.
[Thienes, C., and T.J. Haley. Clinical Toxicology. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger, 1972. 176]**PEER REVIEWED**

14 mg/kg resulted in gastrointestinal effects, and ingestion of 140 mg/kg caused death.
[Cleland, J.G., G.L. Kingsbury. Multimedia Environmental Goals for Environmental Assessment. Volume 1. EPA-600/7-77-136a. Research Triangle Park, NC: EPA, Nov. 1977.,p. E-182]**PEER REVIEWED**

Phenol is toxic if absorbed and may result in death even if the exposed area is as small as that of a hand or forearm.
[Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology. 3rd ed., Volumes 1-26. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, 1978-1984.,p. V17 381 (1982)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Chemexfoliation (chemical peeling) is being used to obtain both therapeutic (eg, actinic keratoses) and cosmetic (eg, removal of fine facial rhytides) benefits. Phenol, one of the most widely used agents for inducing cutaneous exfoliation, may induce cardiac arrhythmias and is toxic to the liver and kidneys. Both phenol and trichloroacetic acid may produce hypertrophic scars and/or keloids and pigmentation irregularities, may accentuate preexisting abnormalities (eg, telangiectasias, nevi, and pores), and may be associated with a flare of latent herpesvirus infection. Prolonged erythema of the treated areas and persistent rhytids have been reported with both agents.
[Lober CW; J Am Acad Dermatol 17 (1): 109-12 (1987)]**PEER REVIEWED**

... Phenol is metabolized to DNA reactants at a low rate by human lymphocytes; the addition of S9 amplifies the rate of metabolism.
[Dean BJ; Mutat Res 154 (3): 153-81 (1985)]**PEER REVIEWED**

... Phenol damages skin, which increases the rate of penetration; therefore, it should be applied only on small areas of skin, and occlusive dressings, bandages, or diapers should not be used. Phenol is not recommended for use in pregnant women, in infants under 6 months, or for diaper rash. Phenolic disinfectants have produced epidemics of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia when used to clean bassinets and mattresses in poorly ventilated nurseries. Fatalities have been documented in infants. ...
[American Medical Association, Council on Drugs. AMA Drug Evaluations Annual 1994. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association, 1994. 1624]**PEER REVIEWED**

Phenol and substituted phenols vary greatly in their antiseptic and disinfectant efficacy and safety. Phenol is bacteriostatic in concentrations of 1:500 to 1:800 and bactericidal and fungicidal in concentrations of 1:50 to 1:100. It is not effective against spores. Phenol is seldom used as an antiseptic or disinfectant. Because it possesses local anesthetic activity and has an antipruritic effect at concentrations of 0.5% to 1.5%, its primary use is as a component of topical antipruritic formulations.
[American Medical Association, Council on Drugs. AMA Drug Evaluations Annual 1994. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association, 1994. 1624]**PEER REVIEWED**

Phenol is not a very volatile cmpd. Consequently, most toxic effects occur from dermal and oral exposure.
[Sullivan, J.B. Jr., G.R. Krieger (eds.). Hazardous Materials Toxicology-Clinical Principles of Environmental Health. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins, 1992. 1093]**PEER REVIEWED**

Phenol is nephrotoxic to humans and animals, especially following chronic exposure. ... Humans have experienced nephritis following toxic dermal exposure.
[Sullivan, J.B. Jr., G.R. Krieger (eds.). Hazardous Materials Toxicology-Clinical Principles of Environmental Health. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins, 1992. 1095]**PEER REVIEWED**

Although esophageal stricture is rare, it is a long term complication that may develop /as a result of phenol poisoning/.
[Gossel, T.A., J.D. Bricker. Principles of Clinical Toxicology. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Raven Press, Ltd., 1994. 222]**PEER REVIEWED**

Several cases of sudden death or intra- or postoperative complications have been reported after phenol face peels ... .
[Marzulli, F.N., H.I. Maibach. Dermatotoxicology 4th ed. New York, NY: Hemisphere Publishing Corp., 1991. 857]**PEER REVIEWED**

Major cardiac arrhythmias were noted ... in 10 out of 43 patients during phenol face peels. However, this item is rather controversial, and some authors feel that when the procedure is done over more than 1 hour, and when the dose applied is carefully monitored, phenol face peels are not risky ... .
[Marzulli, F.N., H.I. Maibach. Dermatotoxicology 4th ed. New York, NY: Hemisphere Publishing Corp., 1991. 858]**PEER REVIEWED**

... A spray of 12.5% phenol dissolved in 25% glycerol in water struck both eyes of a patient, and induced faint haze in the corneal epithelium, associated with fine gray stippling visible by slit-lamp biomicroscope, causing temporary impairment of vision to 6/12 and 6/18. The corneas cleared within 4 days, and vision returned to normal.
[Grant, W.M. Toxicology of the Eye. 3rd ed. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas Publisher, 1986. 720]**PEER REVIEWED**

An oral dose of 1 g of phenol may be lethal to man; however, in exceptional cases, patients have survived the ingestion of 65 g of pure phenol or 120 g of the crude product. Roughly 50 percent of all reported cases have terminated fatally.
[Clayton, G. D. and F. E. Clayton (eds.). Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology: Volume 2A, 2B, 2C: Toxicology. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley Sons, 1981-1982. 2573]**PEER REVIEWED**

Application of a bandage containing 2% phenol to the umbilicus of a newborn baby resulted in death after 11 hour. Another newborn baby treated with 30% phenol:60% camphor for a skin ulcer experienced circulatory failure, cerebral intoxication and methemoglobinemia but recovered after a blood transfusion ... .
[IARC. Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Man. Geneva: World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer,1972-PRESENT. (Multivolume work).,p. V47 277 (1989)]**PEER REVIEWED**

After an acute percutaneous intoxication of a chemical worker with phenol, local effects on the skin were seen in conjunction with several effects due to systemic intoxication, including massive intravascular hemolysis, tachycardia, respiratory depression, and renal and liver damage. The latter was concluded from the increased activities of liver enzymes in the serum ... .
[IARC. Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Man. Geneva: World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer,1972-PRESENT. (Multivolume work).,p. V47 277 (1989)]**PEER REVIEWED**

... Exposure by inhalation to low concn of phenol (0.004 ppm; 0.015 mg/cu m) six times for 5 minutes produced increased sensitivity to light in three volunteers adapted to the dark. Exposure to 0.006 ppm (0.02 mg/cu m) phenol for 15 seconds resulted in the formation of conditioned electrocortical reflexes in four volunteers ... .
[IARC. Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Man. Geneva: World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer,1972-PRESENT. (Multivolume work).,p. V47 277 (1989)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Repeated oral exposure for several weeks (estimated intake, 10-240 mg/day) due to contamination of groundwater after an accidental spill of phenol resulted in mouth sores (burning of the mouth), diarrhea and dark urine. Examination six months after the exposure revealed no residual effect ... .
[IARC. Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Man. Geneva: World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer,1972-PRESENT. (Multivolume work).,p. V47 277 (1989)]**PEER REVIEWED**

... Phenol /was applied/ to the skin (over 75% of the body surface area) of 20 adults at 2% in calamine lotion and 4.75% in phenol-camphor liquid petrolatum preparations. Blood samples were collected pre-exposure and at 2 hour intervals for 1 to 3 days and analyzed for phenol using the method of Deichmann and Schafer. In both tests, pre-exposure concentrations of free phenol in the blood of all subjects averaged 0.15 mg/100 ml and increased to an average of 0.4 mg/100 ml during each of the tests. Pre-exposure concentrations of conjugated (protein-precipitated) phenol in the blood of all subjects averaged 0.35 mg/100 ml in both experiments. Conjugated phenol concentrations in blood increased over the range of 0.9 to 1.9 mg/100 ml of blood for both preparations. There were no detectable differences in the resulting concentrations of free and conjugated phenol in the blood when either preparation was applied to the skin. Detoxication by conjugation was initiated immediately, and blood concentrations of both free and conjugated phenol returned to pre-exposure levels within 24 hours.
[American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Inc. Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices. 6th ed. Volumes I,II, III. Cincinnati, OH: ACGIH, 1991. 1206]**PEER REVIEWED**

... Exposures to airborne phenol and the associated urinary phenol concentrations from employees in a Bakelite factory /were measured/. Airborne concentrations of phenol ranged from 0 to 12.5 mg/cu m (3.3 ppm). Urine samples were collected before and after exposure and analyzed for total, free, and conjugated phenol and for ethereal glucuronides and sulfates; the concentration of free phenol varied little with the changes in airborne phenol concentrations. Ethereal sulfates in the urine generally increased with increasing airborne phenol concentrations. Increases in urine phenol fractions were observed during the work shift, but these concentrations decreased to pre-exposure levels within 16 hours. There were no ill effects in any of the workers surveyed.
[American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Inc. Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices. 6th ed. Volumes I,II, III. Cincinnati, OH: ACGIH, 1991. 1206]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Skin, Eye and Respiratory Irritations:

Strong irritant to tissue.
[Sax, N.I. and R.J. Lewis, Sr. (eds.). Hawley's Condensed Chemical Dictionary. 11th ed. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1987. 897]**PEER REVIEWED**

Vapor irritates respiratory system and eyes.
[Armour, M.A. Hazardous Laboratory Chemicals Disposal Guide. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press Inc., 1991. 288]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Drug Warnings:

DIL PHENOL SOLN (1 TO 2%) ARE USED MEDICINALLY AS ANTIPRURITIC PREPN FOR THE SKIN. THEIR REPEATED USE OVER LARGE SKIN AREAS OR ON PARTICULARLY MOIST AREAS (AXILLARY REGION, GROIN, FEET) SHOULD BE AVOIDED.
[Gosselin, R.E., R.P. Smith, H.C. Hodge. Clinical Toxicology of Commercial Products. 5th ed. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1984.,p. III-344]**PEER REVIEWED**

Soln of phenol (6%) in glycerine are sometimes employed in medical practice to produce nerve blocks. The spread of phenol beyond the intended site (stellate ganglion) resulted in infarction on the cervical cord with extensive paralysis in one patient and neurolosis of the cervical posterior roots with respiratory arrest in another.
[Gosselin, R.E., R.P. Smith, H.C. Hodge. Clinical Toxicology of Commercial Products. 5th ed. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1984.,p. III-344]**PEER REVIEWED**

... Phenol ... should be applied only on small areas of skin and occlusive dressings, bandages, or diapers should not be used.
[American Medical Association, Department of Drugs. Drug Evaluations. 6th ed. Chicago, Ill: American Medical Association, 1986. 1527]**PEER REVIEWED**

Phenol should never be used in pregnant women, in infants under 6 mo, or for diaper rash.
[American Medical Association, Department of Drugs. Drug Evaluations. 6th ed. Chicago, Ill: American Medical Association, 1986. 1527]**PEER REVIEWED**

The development of widespread Herpes simplex on the face after phenolic face peels is not considered rare. Precaution in choosing patients is recommended. Four cases of acute exacerbation of Herpes simplex are presented in patients who had recently undergone phenolic face peels.
[Rapaport MJ, Kamer F; J Dermatol Surg Oncol 10 (1): 57-8 (1984)]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Medical Surveillance:

... There is some suggestive evidence that a biologic monitoring method may be useful for detecting an excessive internal dose on an individual ... and/or on a group basis /for phenol/. Tentative max value in urine <20 mg/g creatinine, permissible value 300 mg/g creatinine. /From table/
[Doull, J., C.D.Klassen, and M.D. Amdur (eds.). Casarett and Doull's Toxicology. 3rd ed., New York: Macmillan Co., Inc., 1986. 913]**PEER REVIEWED**

/SRP: Pre-exposure physical examination followed by annual examination of exposed personnel,/ including studies of liver and kidney function. /Protect/ ... those individuals with diseases of central nervous system, liver, kidney, and lung.
[ITII. Toxic and Hazardous Industrial Chemicals Safety Manual. Tokyo, Japan: The International Technical Information Institute, 1988. 406]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Populations at Special Risk:

Those affected with hepatic or kidney diseases should not be exposed to phenol for any length of time, because even intermittent exposure to vapors ... may become dangerous, particularly when ... handled at elevated temp.
[Clayton, G. D. and F. E. Clayton (eds.). Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology: Volume 2A, 2B, 2C: Toxicology. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley Sons, 1981-1982. 2578]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Probable Routes of Human Exposure:

WITH RARE EXCEPTIONS, HUMAN EXPOSURE IN INDUST HAS BEEN LIMITED TO ACCIDENTAL CONTACT OF PHENOL WITH SKIN OR INHALATION OF PHENOL VAPORS.
[Clayton, G. D. and F. E. Clayton (eds.). Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology: Volume 2A, 2B, 2C: Toxicology. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley Sons, 1981-1982. 2567]**PEER REVIEWED**

NIOSH (NOES Survey 1981-1983) has statistically estimated that 320,914 workers are exposed to phenol in the USA(1). Eighty percent of these exposures are to trade name products containing phenol. Phenol was detected in the general work atmosphere of a brake pad assembly plant in New Holstein, WI - 0.025 and 0.042 ppm(3). The concn of phenol in bakerlite factories was reported to be 12.5 mg/cu m(2). Phenol was measured in the atmosphere of a dental school laboratory in Philadelphia, PA during dissection of cadavers at 1.3-5.0 parts per trillion(4). A study of exposure levels during 25 embalmings found that exposure to phenol was <0.5 ppm(5). The area air concn of phenol during paint stripping operations on a Boeing 747 aircraft (120-330 min sampling periods, n=9) was 3.4-9.5 mg/cu m with a mean of 5.7 mg/cu m(6). For an 8-hr shift, the exposure levels were 1.1-5.3 mg/cu m with a mean of 2.7 mg/cu m(6).
[(1) NIOSH; National Occupational Exposure Survey (1989) (2) USEPA; Ambient Water Quality Criteria Phenol page C-11 USEPA 440/5-80-066 (PB 81-17772) (1980) (3) Almaguer D; Health Hazard Evaluation Report No. HETA-85-048-049-1658 p. 13 (1986) (4) Boiano JM; Health Hazard Evaluation Report No, HETA-84-098-1497 p 16 (1984) (5) Stewart PA et al; Occup Environ Hyg 7:532-40 (1992) (6) Vincent R et al; Int Arch Occup Environ Health 65: 377-80 (1994)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Protective gloves may be permeable to phenol. The breakthrough times and permeation rates of 5 mil thicknesses of five common glove materials to solid phenol were (material, breakthrough time (min), steady state permeation rates (ug/min/sq cm): latex, 10.4, 0.0151; PVC, 10.6, membrane solubilized; polyurethane, 28.0, 0.233; neoprene, 21.0, 0.201; polynitrile, 185.0, 0.0114(1).
[(1) Fricker C, Hardy JK; Am, Ind Hyg Assoc J 53: 745-50 (1992)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Workplace exposure to phenol will occur via inhalation and dermal absorption of phenol-containing wastewater, emissions and disinfectants or solvents. The general population may be exposed to phenol by ingesting food or medicinal products such as throat lozenges. They will also be exposed by inhalation of ambient air and cigarette smoke and dermal absorption of phenol contained in decomposing organic matter and disinfectants and other consumer products(SRC).
[(1) Graedel TE; Chemical Compounds in the Atmosphere p. 256 (1978)]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Body Burden:

Identified, but not quantified, in 9 of 12 samples of breath in Bayonne and Elizabeth, NJ as part of the Total Exposure Assessment Methodology (TEAM) study(1).
[(1) Wallace LA; Toxicol Environ Chem 12: 215-36 (1986)]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Average Daily Intake:

WATER INTAKE: Insufficient data; AIR INTAKE: (assume typical concn in indoor air of 0.70 ug/cu m) 14 ug; FOOD INTAKE: Insufficient data.
[(1) Kostianen R; Atmos Environ 29: 693-702 (1995)]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Minimum Fatal Dose Level:

Ingestion of as little as 4.8 g of pure phenol caused death in 10 min.
[NIOSH; Criteria Document: Phenol p.65 (1976) DHEW Pub NIOSH 76-196]**PEER REVIEWED**

Antidote and Emergency Treatment:

Because of the rapid onset of symptoms, possible increased phenol absorption with dilution, and the potential for development of seizures, activated charcoal (1 g/kg) is preferable to lavage or syrup of ipecac. In vitro studies indicated that activated charcoal efficiently absorbs phenol. A cathartic should be given after oral activated charcoal.
[Ellenhorn, M.J. and D.G. Barceloux. Medical Toxicology - Diagnosis and Treatment of Human Poisoning. New York, NY: Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Inc. 1988. 952]**PEER REVIEWED**

Immediate emesis or lavage after phenol ingestion is important to consider, but are contraindicated in esophageal injury. Egg whites, milk, or gelatin solution, which serve a protein sources to interact with phenol remaining in the stomach, may be given. Activated charcoal, followed by a cathartic, may be preferred to ipecac induced emesis or lavage in decontamination of the GI tract and preventing systemic absorption of phenol.
[Gossel, T.A., J.D. Bricker. Principles of Clinical Toxicology. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Raven Press, Ltd., 1994. 222]**PEER REVIEWED**

Phenol may be extracted from cutaneous tissues by use of alcohol following either intentional or accidental application. An alcohol bath or dressing of alcohol applied to the affected area for several minutes will extract most of the phenol. Phenol has a much greater solubility in alcohol than in the aqueous tissue fluids and therefore diffuses out of the tissues. If phenol has penetrated deeply, an oil dressing should be applied after two or three applications of alcohol. Phenol will also preferentially diffuse into oil.
[Booth, N.H., L.E. McDonald (eds.). Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 5th ed. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press, 1982. 707]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Animal Toxicity Studies:

 

 

Toxicity Summary:

HUMAN TOXICITY: Phenol is toxic with a probable oral lethal dose to humans of 50-500 mg/kg. Some individuals may be hypersensitive with lethality or serious effects at very low exposures. Rapid absorption and severe systemic toxicity can occur after any route of exposure including skin. Death and severe toxicity are usually due to effects on the CNS, heart, blood vessels, lung, and kidneys. However, toxic manifestations may vary somewhat with the route. Observed effects from acute exposure may include: shock, delirium, coma, pulmonary distress, phenolic breath, scanty/dark urine, and death. Protracted or chronic exposure usually results in major damage to the liver, kidneys and eyes. Pigmentary changes of the skin have been noted. Consumption of water contaminated with phenol resulted in diarrhea, mouth sores, burning of the mouth, and dark urine. Phenol is highly caustic to tissues. Skin exposure results in pain, then numbness, blanching, severe burns, and eschar formation. Ingestion leads to burning of throat and severe gastrointestinal inflammation. Inhalation can result in pulmonary irritation and edema. ANIMAL TOXICITY: Toxicity in animals is similar to that of humans, although additional effects have been observed. LD50's in animals range from 250-500 mg/kg, differing very little with route of exposure or species, except for the cat which is unusually susceptible with an oral lethal dose of 80 mg/kg. Additional reported toxic effects include irritation and corrosivity of skin and eyes in rabbits, induction of skin tumors in mice, reproductive effects in rats, and mutagenicity with Salmonella, E coli and Drosophila. Phenol is also highly toxic to aquatic life and frogs. METABOLISM: Phenol is metabolized and excreted principally by the kidneys as the sulfate or glucuronide, although some phenol may be excreted unchanged, especially at high doses. Other reported metabolites include hydroquinone, other quinones and catechols.
**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Evidence for Carcinogenicity:

Evaluation: There is inadequate evidence in humans for the carcinogenicity of phenol. There is inadequate evidence in experimental animals for the carcinogenicity of phenol. Overall evaluation: Phenol is not classifiable as to its carcinogenicity to humans (Group 3).
[IARC. Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Man. Geneva: World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer,1972-PRESENT. (Multivolume work).,p. 71 762 (1999)]**PEER REVIEWED**

CLASSIFICATION: D; not classifiable as to human carcinogenicity. BASIS FOR CLASSIFICATION: Based on no human carcinogenicity data and inadequate animal data. HUMAN CARCINOGENICITY DATA: None. ANIMAL CARCINOGENICITY DATA: Inadequate.
[U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) on Phenol (108-95-2) Available from: http://www.epa.gov/ngispgm3/iris on the Substance File List as of March 15, 2000]**PEER REVIEWED**

A4. A4= Not classifiable as a human carcinogen.
[American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. TLVs and BEIs. Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices. Cincinnati, OH. 2000. 55]**QC REVIEWED**

 

Non-Human Toxicity Excerpts:

... GUINEA PIGS WERE SEVERELY INJURED DUE TO INHALATION FOR 20 DAYS OF PHENOL VAPOR AT CONCENTRATIONS OF FROM 25 TO 50 PPM. POST MORTEM EVIDENCE OF ACUTE TOXICITY TO LUNG, HEART, LIVER AND KIDNEYS WAS FOUND.
[American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices. 5th ed. Cincinnati, OH:American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 1986. 469]**PEER REVIEWED**

ON RABBIT EYES, CRYSTALLINE OR CONCN AQ PHENOL CAUSES ALMOST INSTANTANEOUS WHITE OPACIFICATION OF THE CORNEAL EPITHELIUM. EIGHT HOURS AFTER APPLICATION THE CORNEA IS ANESTHETIC, THE SURFACE ULCERATED, AND THE STROMA OPAQUE. IN 5 WK THERE IS ENTROPION, SCARRING OF THE CONJUNCTIVA, AND OPACITY OF THE CORNEA.
[Grant, W.M. Toxicology of the Eye. 3rd ed. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas Publisher, 1986. 720]**PEER REVIEWED**

PRETREATMENT WITH SINGLE APPLICATION OF ABOUT 75 UG OF 9,10-DIMETHYL-1,2-BENZANTHRACENE (DMBA) WAS NOT ESSENTIAL FOR INDUCTION OF TUMORS. PHENOL ... /ALONE INDUCED/ PAPILLOMAS & CARCINOMAS, BUT TIME REQUIRED FOR PRODN OF TUMORS WAS EXTENDED WHEN PRETREATMENT WITH DMBA ... EXCLUDED. MAX RESPONSE PRODUCED WITH 10% SOLN ... LESS MARKED, BUT POSITIVE, EFFECT WAS CAUSED BY A 5% SOLN. A MORE CONCENTRATED (20%) SOLN CAUSED DEATH FROM SYSTEMIC TOXICITY BEFORE TUMORS WERE PRODUCED. BY USING REAGENT GRADE, USP & PURIFIED PHENOL, IT WAS SHOWN THAT THIS /TUMORIGENIC/ ACTION WAS DUE TO PHENOL ITSELF, NOT TO A CONTAMINANT.
[Clayton, G. D. and F. E. Clayton (eds.). Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology: Volume 2A, 2B, 2C: Toxicology. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley Sons, 1981-1982. 2583]**PEER REVIEWED**

THE EFFECT OF PHENOL ON THE PERMEABILITY OF ORGANELLE MEMBRANES OF CULTURED CELLS WAS ASSESSED. BHK (BABY HAMSTER KIDNEY)-(21)C13 CELLS WERE GROWN AS MONOLAYERS ON GLASS COVER SLIPS & EXPOSED FOR 1 HR TO 1 MG/L & 2 MG/L PHENOL. AT A CONCN OF 1 MG/ML, PHENOL CAUSED LABILIZATION OF THE LYSOSOMES & CONSEQUENT LOSS OF ENZYMES, WHICH IS FURTHER ENHANCED AT 2 MG/ML. THE MITCHONDRIAL MEMBRANES ALSO SHOWED A MARKED INCREASE IN PERMEABILITY AFTER EXPOSURE TO 1 MG/ML PHENOL, BUT TO A LESSER EXTENT THAN THAT OF LYSOSOMES.
[TYAS MJ; HISTOCHEM J 10 (3): 333 (1978)]**PEER REVIEWED**

IN SPRAGUE-DAWLEY RATS, ONE-HALF OF THE ANIMALS BECAME DEEPLY COMATOSE WITH 540 UMOL OF IP PHENOL & 100% WITH 600 UMOL. FIVE STAGES OF ENCEPHALOPATHY WERE READILY DISTINGUISHED WITH SYMPTOMS OF INCREASED & DECREASED MUSCLE TONUS, RIGHTING REFLEX, & BODY TREMOR UNTIL RECOVERY OR DEATH OF ANIMALS.
[WINDUS-PODEHL G ET AL; J LAB CLIN MED 101 (4): 586 (1983)]**PEER REVIEWED**

In animals, the pathological changes produced by phenol vary with the route of absorption, vehicle employed, concentration, and duration of exposure. Local skin disorders include eczema, inflammation, discoloration, papillomas, necrosis, sloughing, and gangrene. After oral ingestion, the mucous membranes of the throat and esophagus may show swelling, corrosions, and necrosis, with hemorrhage and serous infiltration of the surrounding areas. In severe intoxication, the lungs may show hyperemia, infarcts, bronchopneumonia, purulent bronchitis, and hyperplasia of the peribronchial tissues. Myocardial degeneration and necrosis can be present. The hepatic cells may be enlarged, pale, and coarsely granular with swollen fragmented and pyknotic nuclei. Prolonged administration of phenol may cause parenchymatous nephritis, hyperemia, edema of the convoluted tubules, and degenerative changes of the glomeruli. Blood cells become hyaline, with granules. Marked striation of the muscle fibers is also seen.
[Deichmann WB, Keplinger ML; Indus Hyg Toxicol p.1363 (1963) as cited in USEPA; Ambient Water Quality Criteria Doc: Phenol p.C-23-6 (1980) EPA 440/5-80-066]**PEER REVIEWED**

Following initiation with 9,10-dimethyl-1-2,-benzanthracene (DMBA) and promotion by croton oil through skin painting, mice received 2/wk dermal applications of 2.5 mg phenol (as a 10% solution in benzene). Mice exhibited severe skin damage, decreased body weight and increased mortality. After 13 weeks, 22/23 mice had developed papillomas, and 13% had carcinomas of the skin. In mice treated with DMBA only, 3/21 survivors exhibited papillomas after 42 weeks. Through skin painting with 10% phenol, 5/14 survivors (36%) had papillomas after 52 weeks. In this group, skin painting was continued to 72 weeks at which time one fibrosarcoma was diagnosed.
[Boutwell RK, Bosch DK; Cancer Res 19: 413-24 (1959) as cited in USEPA; Ambient Water Quality Criteria Doc: Phenol p.31 (1980) EPA 440/5-80-066]**PEER REVIEWED**

The S strain albino mice showed strong promoting activity for tumor formation after initiation with 0.3 mg 9,10-dimethyl-1,-2,-benzanthracene (DMBA) followed by repeated skin applications of 20% phenol. 20% phenol soln produced significant damage to the skin and were weakly carcinogenic when applied alone. Phenol in a 5% soln had moderate promoting activity, but was not carcinogenic without previous initiation.
[Salaman MH, Glendenning OM; Br J Cancer 11: 434-44 (1957) as cited in USEPA; Ambient Water Quality Criteria Doc: Phenol p.32 (1980) EPA 440/5-80-066]**PEER REVIEWED**

Experiments with Drosophila have shown phenol to be highly mutagenic.
[Cleland, J.G., G.L. Kingsbury. Multimedia Environmental Goals for Environmental Assessment. Volume 1. EPA-600/7-77-136a. Research Triangle Park, NC: EPA, Nov. 1977.,p. E-182]**PEER REVIEWED**

Phenol was evaluated for the induction of sex-linked recessive lethal mutations in Drosophila melanogaster by the National Toxicology Program. Canton-S wild-type males were treated with concentrations of phenol that result in approximately 30% mortality. Following treatment, males were mated individually to 3 harems of Basc virgin females to produce 3 broods for analysis. The concentrations of phenol tested by injection (5250 ppm) or feeding (2000 ppm) were negative in this assay.
[Woodruff RC et al; Environ Mutagen 7: 677-702 (1985)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Phenol is very toxic to fish and has a nearly unique quality of tainting the taste of fish if present in marine environments at 0.1-1.0 ppm.
[Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology. 3rd ed., Volumes 1-26. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, 1978-1984.,p. V17 382 (1982)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Poisoning from prep containing phenol is occasionally seen in domestic animals, but especially in cats.
[Humphreys, D.J. Veterinary Toxicology. 3rd ed. London, England: Bailliere Tindell, 1988. 205]**PEER REVIEWED**

Glaucoma has been induced experimentally in rabbits by injecting 5% phenol in almond oil subconjunctivally in all four quadrants.
[Grant, W.M. Toxicology of the Eye. 3rd ed. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas Publisher, 1986. 720]**PEER REVIEWED**

Phenols ... have been implicated ... /in the formation/ of Heinz bodies in many /animal/ species.
[Doull, J., C.D.Klassen, and M.D. Amdur (eds.). Casarett and Doull's Toxicology. 3rd ed., New York: Macmillan Co., Inc., 1986. 239]**PEER REVIEWED**

Minor and Becker (1971) injected rats ip on days 8-10 or 11-15 /of gestation/ with up to 200 mg/kg. No adverse fetal effects were observed.
[Shepard, T.H. Catalog of Teratogenic Agents. 5th ed. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986. 448]**PEER REVIEWED**

Phenol tested positive for mutagenicity in L5178Y Mouse Lymphoma cells.
[NTP; Fiscal Year 1987 Annual Plan p.82 (1987) NTP-87-001]**PEER REVIEWED**

Mutation: Esherischia coli back mutation dose 0.1-0.2%.
[Demerec M et al; Amer Natur 85: 119 (1951) as cited in USEPA; Ambient Water Quality Criteria Doc: Phenol p.30 (1980) EPA 440/5-80-066]**PEER REVIEWED**

Inhalation of phenol was related to stimulation of central nervous system, followed by severe depression. Exposure of animals to phenol resulted in paralysis in some animal species, but not in others.
[O'Donoghue JL; Phenol and Related Substances. In: Neurotoxicity of Industrial and Commercial Chemicals CRC Press pp. 739-53 (1985)]**PEER REVIEWED**

In grey mullet exposed to 5 mg phenol/l for 8 days, blood sugar and the activities of aspartate aminotransferase and lactate dehydrogenase in blood plasma were above controls; no gross pathology was observed. After an 8 day exposure to 7.5 mg phenol/l, blood hemoglobin concn, hematocrit value, and lactate, protein, glyceride, and cholesterol concentrations were below controls and blood sugar concn and the activities of aspartate aminotransferase and GPT were above controls. Damage to gills, liver, gallbladder, and kidney was observed. Higher concentrations (10-28 mg/l) were lethal in several hours; 0.5 mg/l was nontoxic during an 8 day exposure.
[Krajnovic-Ozretic M, Ozretic B; Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 40 (1): 23-9 (1988)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Male B6C3F1 mouse bone marrow adherent stromal cells were plated at 4X10+6 cells per 2 ml of DMEM medium in 35 mm tissue culture dishes. The growing stromal cell cultures were exposed to log 2 doses of phenol for 7 days. The doses which caused a 50% decrease in colony formation (TD50) was 190x10-6 M for phenol.
[Gaido K, Wierda D; Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 76 (1): 45-55 (1984)]**PEER REVIEWED**

A dog bathed in a phenolic disinfectant developed signs including an anorexia, excessive salivation, muscular twitching, vomiting, cutaneous erythema, pruritis and necrosis and a rectal temperature of 40.0 deg C. Topical and parenteral antibiotic treatment resulted in recovery within one week.
[Humphreys, D.J. Veterinary Toxicology. 3rd ed. London, England: Bailliere Tindell, 1988. 206]**PEER REVIEWED**

The post-mortem changes associated with ingestion of phenol or cresol are those that would be expected following exposure to any extremely irritant and corrosive poison. Centribular necrosis and haemorrhage of the liver are produced in pigs consuming 'clay' pigeons.
[Humphreys, D.J. Veterinary Toxicology. 3rd ed. London, England: Bailliere Tindell, 1988. 205]**PEER REVIEWED**

... Phenol was administered to rats or mice at 0, 2500, or 5000 ppm in drinking water for 103 weeks. An increased incidence of leukemia and lymphomas was detected only in the low dose male rats.
[American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Inc. Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices. 6th ed. Volumes I,II, III. Cincinnati, OH: ACGIH, 1991. 1205]**PEER REVIEWED**

Molten analytical grade phenol was applied to the intact skin of the pigs at 500 mg/kg, over 35% to 40% of the total body surface area for 1.0 or 2.5 minutes. Phenol was absorbed rapidly through the intact skin. Increasing the concentration of the applied phenol did not increase the plasma phenol concentration as much as did increasing the treated surface area. Peak plasma phenol concentrations (52.6 ppm) were achieved at 1.75 hours postexposure. Phenol was detected in plasma 8.75 hours after exposure, but it was not detectable at 23 hours. The metabolism and elimination of parent phenol and its metabolites were not examined.
[American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Inc. Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices. 6th ed. Volumes I,II, III. Cincinnati, OH: ACGIH, 1991. 1205]**PEER REVIEWED**

... A study was conducted to compare the cardiovascular responses to these two agents in a rat model. Fifteen rats underwent abdominal epilation. Two to six days later a surface area comparable to the human face (16 sq cm) was delineated on the abdomen. Baker's phenol of 50% TCA was applied to this area. Cardiac rate and rhythm and arterial pressure were monitored. Once stable, the same agent was applied to the entire abdomen for furthur study. TCA has been shown to be a safer agent than phenol in this rat model. Assuming that this model simulates the human response, monitoring would appear to be indicated during full-face Baker's phenol peeling.
[Stagnone GJ et al; J Dermatol Surg Oncol 13 (9): 999-1002 (1987)]**PEER REVIEWED**

... Under the conditions of this bioassay, phenol was not carcinogenic for either male or female F344 rats or male and female B6C3F1 mice. Levels of Evidence of Carcinogenicity: Male Rats: Negative; Female Rats: Negative; Male Mice: Negative; Female Mice: Negative.
[Bioassay of Phenol for Possible Carcinogenicity (1980) Technical Rpt Series No. 203 DHEW Pub No. (NIH) 80-#1759, U.S. Department of Health Education and Welfare, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20014]**QC REVIEWED**

 

National Toxicology Program Studies:

A bioassay of phenol to test for possible carcinogenicity was conducted by providing this substance in drinking water to F344 rats and B6C3F1 mice. Groups of 50 rats and 50 mice of each sex were given drinking water containing 2,500 or 5,000 ppm phenol for 103 wk. As matched controls, groups of 50 rats and 50 mice of each sex received tap water. ... Under the conditions of this bioassay, phenol was not carcinogenic for either male or female F344 rats or male and female B6C3F1 mice. Levels of Evidence of Carcinogenicity: Male Rats: Negative; Female Rats: Negative; Male Mice: Negative; Female Mice: Negative.
[Bioassay of Phenol for Possible Carcinogenicity (1980) Technical Rpt Series No. 203 DHEW Pub No. (NIH) 80-#1759, U.S. Department of Health Education and Welfare, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20014]**QC REVIEWED**

 

Non-Human Toxicity Values:

LD50 Rat oral 0.53 g/kg
[Verschueren, K. Handbook of Environmental Data of Organic Chemicals. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1983. 982]**PEER REVIEWED**

LD50 Cat oral 0.1 g/kg
[Verschueren, K. Handbook of Environmental Data of Organic Chemicals. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1983. 982]**PEER REVIEWED**

LD50 Dog oral 0.5 g/kg
[Verschueren, K. Handbook of Environmental Data of Organic Chemicals. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1983. 982]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Ecotoxicity Values:

TDLO Minnow 30 min 79 ug/l
[Cleland, J.G., G.L. Kingsbury. Multimedia Environmental Goals for Environmental Assessment. Volume 1. EPA-600/7-77-136a. Research Triangle Park, NC: EPA, Nov. 1977.,p. E-182]**PEER REVIEWED**

LC50 Crangon crangon 5600 mg/l 3 min, 20 mg/l 1 hr, 80 mg/l 3 hr, 40 mg/l 6-24 hr, 30 mg/l 48-72 hr, 25 mg/l 96 hr in sea water at 15 deg C /Conditions of bioassay not specified/
[Verschueren, K. Handbook of Environmental Data of Organic Chemicals. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1983. 980]**PEER REVIEWED**

Algae: Chlorella pyrenoidosa toxic: 233 mg/l, 1.06 mg/l /Conditions of bioassay not specified/
[Verschueren, K. Handbook of Environmental Data of Organic Chemicals. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1983. 979]**PEER REVIEWED**

Scenedesmus quadricauda toxicity threshold (cell multiplication inhibition test) 7.5 mg/l /Conditions of bioassay not specified/
[Verschueren, K. Handbook of Environmental Data of Organic Chemicals. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1983. 979]**PEER REVIEWED**

Algae: Microcystis aeruginosa inhibition of cell multiplication noted at 4.6 mg/l /Conditions of bioassay not specified/
[Verschueren, K. Handbook of Environmental Data of Organic Chemicals. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1983. 979]**PEER REVIEWED**

Protozoa: Vorticella campanula perturbation level 3 mg/l /Conditions of bioassay not specified/
[Verschueren, K. Handbook of Environmental Data of Organic Chemicals. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1983. 980]**PEER REVIEWED**

Protozoa: Paramecium caudatum: perturbation level, 10 mg/l /Conditions of bioassay not specified/
[Verschueren, K. Handbook of Environmental Data of Organic Chemicals. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1983. 980]**PEER REVIEWED**

Arthropoda: LD0 Daphnia magna 16 mg/l /Conditions of bioassay not specified/
[Verschueren, K. Handbook of Environmental Data of Organic Chemicals. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1983. 980]**PEER REVIEWED**

Arthropoda: TLm Daphnia magna 100/100 mg/l 25-50 hr /Conditions of bioassay not specified/
[Verschueren, K. Handbook of Environmental Data of Organic Chemicals. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1983. 980]**PEER REVIEWED**

Arthropoda: TLm Daphnia magna (young) 17/7 mg/l 25-50 hr /Conditions of bioassay not specified/
[Verschueren, K. Handbook of Environmental Data of Organic Chemicals. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1983. 980]**PEER REVIEWED**

Arthropoda: TLm Daphnia magna (adult) 61/21 mg/l 25-50 hr /Conditions of bioassay not specified/
[Verschueren, K. Handbook of Environmental Data of Organic Chemicals. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1983. 980]**PEER REVIEWED**

Arthropoda: Brine shrimp 157/56 mg/l 24-48 hr /Conditions of bioassay not specified/
[Verschueren, K. Handbook of Environmental Data of Organic Chemicals. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1983. 980]**PEER REVIEWED**

Fish: TLm Lepomis macrochirus >15 mg/l 25-50 hr /Conditions of bioassay not specified/
[Verschueren, K. Handbook of Environmental Data of Organic Chemicals. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1983.,p. 980-81]**PEER REVIEWED**

Fish: TLm Arctopsyche grandis 61/0.001 mg/l 24-96 hr /Conditions of bioassay not specified/
[Verschueren, K. Handbook of Environmental Data of Organic Chemicals. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1983.,p. 980-81]**PEER REVIEWED**

Fish: TLm Mosquito fish 22.7/56 mg/l 24-96 hr /Conditions of bioassay not specified/
[Verschueren, K. Handbook of Environmental Data of Organic Chemicals. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1983.,p. 980-81]**PEER REVIEWED**

TLm bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus) 5.7-20 mg/l/96 hr in a flow-through bioassay
[Wilber CG; The Bio Aspects of Water Poll (1969) as cited in Environment Canada; Tech Info for Problem Spills: Phenol (Draft) P.62 (1981)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Fish: TLm Bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus) 19/5.7 mg/l 24-96 hr /Conditions of bioassay not specified/
[Verschueren, K. Handbook of Environmental Data of Organic Chemicals. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1983.,p. 980-81]**PEER REVIEWED**

TLM Mercenaria mercenaria (hard clam) larvae 5.5X10+4/12 days in a static bioassay.
[Verschueren, K. Handbook of Environmental Data of Organic Chemicals. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1983. 981]**PEER REVIEWED**

LC50 Rainbow trout 5.6-11.3 mg/l/24 hr in a static bioassay.
[Verschueren, K. Handbook of Environmental Data of Organic Chemicals. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1983. 982]**PEER REVIEWED**

TLM Fathead minnow 41 mg/l/48 hr at 15 deg C; 28 mg/l/48 hr at 25 deg C, both tests conducted in a flow-through bioassay.
[Verschueren, K. Handbook of Environmental Data of Organic Chemicals. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1983. 982]**PEER REVIEWED**

TLM Fathead minnow 36 mg/l/96 hr at 15 deg C; 24 mg/l/96 hr at 25 deg C, both tests conducted in a flow-through bioassay.
[Verschueren, K. Handbook of Environmental Data of Organic Chemicals. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1983. 982]**PEER REVIEWED**

TLm Goldfish 49.9 mg/l/24 hr, 49.1 mg/l/48 hr, 44.5 mg/l/96 hr in soft water /Conditions of bioasay not specified/
[Verschueren, K. Handbook of Environmental Data of Organic Chemicals. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1983. 981]**PEER REVIEWED**

TLm Roach 15 mg/l/24 hr /Conditions of bioassay not specified/
[Verschueren, K. Handbook of Environmental Data of Organic Chemicals. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1983. 981]**PEER REVIEWED**

TLm Crassostrea virginica (american oyster) egg 5.825X10+4 ppb/48 hr in a static bioassay.
[Verschueren, K. Handbook of Environmental Data of Organic Chemicals. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1983. 980]**PEER REVIEWED**

TLm Mercenaria mercenaria (hard clam) egg 5.263X10+4 ppb/48 hr in a static bioassay.
[Verschueren, K. Handbook of Environmental Data of Organic Chemicals. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1983. 980]**PEER REVIEWED**

LC50 Golden shiner 35-129 mg/l in a static bioassay.
[Verschueren, K. Handbook of Environmental Data of Organic Chemicals. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1983. 982]**PEER REVIEWED**

LC50 Ophicephalus punctatus 46.0 mg/l/48 hr in a static bioassay.
[Verschueren, K. Handbook of Environmental Data of Organic Chemicals. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1983. 98]**PEER REVIEWED**

LC50 Fathead minnow >50 mg/l/1 hr, >50 mg/l/24 hr, 33 mg/l/72 hr, 32 mg/l/96 hr in a static bioassay in Lake Superior Water at 18-22 deg C.
[Verschueren, K. Handbook of Environmental Data of Organic Chemicals. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1983. 981]**PEER REVIEWED**

LC50 Goldfish 60-200 mg/l/24 hr in a static bioassay.
[Verschueren, K. Handbook of Environmental Data of Organic Chemicals. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1983. 982]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

TSCA Test Submissions:

Phenol (CAS # 108-95-2) was evaluated for subchronic dietary toxicity. The test substance was administered to male albino rats (10/group) for 28-days at a concentration level of 100 ppm (8.22 mg/kg/day); 500 ppm (42.8 mg/kg/day); and 1000 ppm (86.2 mg/kg/day). No deaths or signs of intoxication were noted among any of the animals. At autopsy, no significant gross pathologic lesions were found.
[MONSANTO CO; Acute Oral, Eye, Skin, and Inhalation Toxicity, Preliminary Ground Water Assessment, and Characterization of Plant Effluents of Phenol with Cover Letter Dated 072787; 05/29/86; EPA Doc No. 86-870000940; Fiche No. OTS0515378] **UNREVIEWED**

Phenol (CAS # 108-95-2) was evaluated for subchronic oral toxicity. The test substance was administered by gavage to rabbits (sex and strain not indicated) in a 10% alcohol solution at a dosage level of 0.5 g/kg (1 rabbit, 2 doses); 0.1 g/kg (2 rabbits, 20 doses each); 0.05 g/kg (1 rabbit, 20 doses); and 0.01 g/kg (1 rabbit, 20 doses). At 0.5 g/kg, the rabbit died and necropsy revealed a swelled, congested liver, and desquamation of the stomach. At 0.1 g/kg, 1 rabbit had kidney irritation and the other rabbit had slight liver degeneration.
[DOW CHEM CO; Toxicity of Phenol; 12/15/44; EPA Doc No. 86-870002216; Fiche No. OTS0517006] **UNREVIEWED**

Phenol (CAS # 108-95-2) was evaluated for subchronic oral toxicity. The test substance was administered by gavage to rats (sex and strain not indicated) at a dosage level of 0.5 g/kg (1 rat, 1 dose); 0.3 g/kg (1 rat, 17 doses); 0.2 g/kg (1 rat, 20 doses); 0.1 g/kg (2 rats, 20 doses each); and 0.01 g/kg (1 rat, 20 doses). At 0.5 g/kg the rat died and at 0.2 g/kg the rat had pneumonia and died. At 0.2 and 0.1 g/kg, the rats had areas of liver degeneration.
[DOW CHEM CO; Toxicity of Phenol; 12/15/44; EPA Doc No. 86-870002216; Fiche No. OTS0517006] **UNREVIEWED**

Phenol (CAS # 108-95-2) was evaluated for subchronic oral toxicity. The test substance was administered to rabbits (number, sex, and strain not indicated) at dosage levels of 0.001 or 0.1 g/kg for 20 doses. At 0.1 g/kg, slight kidney change was noted and at 0.001 g/kg, there was no observable change.
[DOW CHEM CO; Physiological Effect of Phenol in Dowell Paraffin Solvent; 02/15/35; EPA Doc No. 86-870002218; Fiche No. OTS0517008] **UNREVIEWED**

Phenol (CAS # 108-95-2) was evaluated for chronic oral toxicity. In the first experiment, the test substance was administered by gavage to groups of 3 rats (sex and strain not indicated) at dosage levels of 0.2, 0.1, 0.05, or 0.01 g/kg for 6 months. At 0.2 g/kg, the animals died or were sacrificed after 1, 6, and 16 doses; all animals had tremors. The animals receiving 1 and 6 doses had stomach irritation; liver congestion and degeneration; and kidney congestion and slight hemorrhage. The animal that received 16 doses was moribund when sacrificed, but no toxicity was detected microscopically. Two animals at 0.1 g/kg, 2 animals at 0.05 g/kg, and 1 animals at 0.01 g/kg survived 136 doses with no pathological findings. In the second experiment, the test substance was administered by gavage to groups of 10 rats (sex and strain not indicated) at dosage levels of 0.1 or 0.05 g/kg for 6 months (5 days a week until 135 or 136 doses had been given). Four rats from each group died; there was no indication that death was treatment-related. At 0.1 g/kg, there was a cloudy swelling of the livers and damage to the kidneys with a cloudy swelling of the tubular epithelium. There was also a slight increase in the weights of the liver and kidneys. At 0.05 g/kg, 2 animals had injured kidneys, distention of the pelvis, slight tubular degeneration and a few casts. Blood chemistry indicated a slight decrease in lymphocytes and bone marrow count was normal.
[DOW CHEM CO; Toxicity of Phenol; 12/15/44; EPA Doc No. 86- 870002216; Fiche No. OTS0517006] **UNREVIEWED**

Phenol (CAS # 108-95-2) was evaluated for reproductive oral toxicity. The test substance was administered by gavage to mated Charles River Crl:CD VAF/Plus female rats (10/group) at dosage levels of 0 mg/kg/day (Control); 3 groups at 60 mg/kg/day; 3 groups at 120 mg/kg/day; or 180 mg/kg/day on gestation days 6 through 14. At 120 mg/kg/day, maternal toxicity included reduced body weight gain and feed consumption. There were treatment-related findings in regards to clinical signs, developmental toxicity, necropsy findings, organ weights, or pathology results.
[Procter & Gamble Co; Range Finding Maternal Toxicity Study with Phenol in Rats with Cover Letter 072992; 06/25/93; EPA Doc No. 86-930000341; Fiche No. OTS0537777] **UNREVIEWED**

 

Metabolism/Pharmacokinetics:

 

 

Metabolism/Metabolites:

A PORTION OF ABSORBED /PHENOL/ DRUG IS OXIDIZED TO HYDROQUINONE & PYROCATECHOL.
[Gilman, A. G., L. S. Goodman, and A. Gilman. (eds.). Goodman and Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. 6th ed. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc. 1980. 967]**PEER REVIEWED**

Phenols are subjected to oxidative metabolism leading to ortho- and para-hydroxylated products. These metabolites are then transformed into equimolar amounts of two conjugates, sulfates and glucuronides.
[Britt DL, Hushon JM; Biol Effects, Crit and Stand Haz Pollut Assoc Energy Technol p.29 (1976)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Metabolism in rabbits given a lethal dose of phenol (0.5 g/kg) resulted in: 47% oxidation to carbon dioxide and water plus traces of 1,4-dihydroxybenzene and ortho-dihydroxybenzene, 3% excreted in urine, 50% remaining in the carcass. Amounts were exhaled in air and excreted in in the feces. Metabolism in rabbits given a sublethal dose of phenol (0.3 g/kg) resulted in: 23% oxidation to carbon dioxide and water plus traces of 1,4-dihydroxybenzene and ortho-dihydroxybenzene, 72% excreted in the urine, 4% remaining in the carcass, 1% excreted in the feces, and trace amounts exhaled in air. Urinary route resulted in either excretion as free phenol or as conjugate. (Conjugation with sulfuric acid, glucuronic acid or other acids). /From figure/
[Deichmann WB, Keplinger ML; In Patty FA (ed); Indus Hyg Toxiology; p.1363 (1963) as cited in USEPA; Ambient Water Quality Criteria Doc: Phenol p.C-16-19 (1980) EPA 440/5-80-066]**PEER REVIEWED**

The cat was shown to be sensitive to phenol. In addition to sulfate conjugates, free 1,4-dihydroxybenzene was found as a major metabolite which may account for the toxicity observed in the cat.
[Miller JJ et al; Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 38: 47 (1976) as cited in USEPA; Ambient Water Quality Criteria Doc: Phenol p.C-19 (1980) EPA 440/5-80-066]**PEER REVIEWED**

Some species differences have been noted in the metabolism of phenol. Man, rat, mouse, jerboa, gerbil, hamster, lemming, and guinea pig excreted four metabolites: sulfate and glucuronic acid conjugates of phenol and of 1,4-dihydroxybenzene. The squirrel and capuchin monkeys excreted phenol glucuronide, 1,4-dihydroxybenzene glucuronide, and phenol sulfate. The ferret, dog, hedgehog, and rabbit excreted phenol sulfate, 1,4-dihydroxybenzene sulfate, and phenyl glucuronide. The Rhesus monkey, fruit bat, and chicken excreted phenyl sulfate and phenyl glucuronide but not 1,4-dihydroxybenzene conjugates. The cat excreted only phenyl sulfate and 1,4-dihydroxybenzene sulfate, and the pig excreted phenyl glucuronide as its major phenol metabolite. Relatively low doses were utilized in this study.
[Capel ID et al; Biochem J 127: 25 (1972) as cited in USEPA; Ambient Water Quality Criteria Doc: Phenol p.C-16-19 (1980) EPA 440/5-80-066]**PEER REVIEWED**

Concentrations of conjugated phenol in the urine increased following exposure of humans to phenol from as little as 0.6 mg/cu m (0.16 ppm) to as much as 12.5 mg/cu m (3.3 ppm) without a significant increase in the concentration of free phenol.
[Ohtsuji H, Ikeda M; Brit J Ind Med 29: 70-3 (1972) as cited in NIOSH; Criteria Document: Phenol p.64 (1976) DHEW Pub NIOSH 76-196]**PEER REVIEWED**

After absorption into the body, most ... phenol is oxidized and conjugated with sulfuric, glucuronic and other acids.
[Clayton, G. D. and F. E. Clayton (eds.). Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology: Volume 2A, 2B, 2C: Toxicology. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley Sons, 1981-1982. 2571]**PEER REVIEWED**

IN MAN, 90% OF ORAL DOSE OF PHENOL WAS EXCRETED IN 24 HR, MAINLY AS PHENYLSULFATE (77% OF 24 HR EXCRETION) & PHENYLGLUCURONIDE (16%), WITH VERY SMALL AMT OF QUINOL SULFATE & GLUCURONIDE. THESE METAB WERE ALSO EXCRETED BY RAT, MOUSE, JERBON, GERBIL, HAMSTER, LEMMING & GUINEA PIG. /PHENOL/
[The Chemical Society. Foreign Compound Metabolism in Mammals Volume 3. London: The Chemical Society, 1975. 569]**PEER REVIEWED**

The sulfate conjugate in urine dominates at low exposure doses, and glucuronides assume greater importance at higher phenol exposure concentrations. Below 5 ppm phenol, the sulfate/glucuronide ratio is 3.7:1.
[Que Hee, S. (ed.). Biological Monitoring an Introduction. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1993. 471]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Absorption, Distribution & Excretion:

PHENOL IS ABSORBED BY ALL ROUTES OF ADMIN & CAN REACH CIRCULATION EVEN WHEN APPLIED TO INTACT SKIN.
[Gilman, A. G., L. S. Goodman, and A. Gilman. (eds.). Goodman and Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. 6th ed. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc. 1980. 967]**PEER REVIEWED**

ABSORPTION OF 2 G OF PHENOL COULD RESULT FROM 8 HR INHALATION AT ABOUT 50 PPM.
[American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Inc. Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values, 4th ed., 1980. Cincinnati, Ohio: American Conference ofGovernmmental Industrial Hygienists, Inc., 1980. 328]**PEER REVIEWED**

EXPTL OBSERVATIONS HAVE SHOWN THAT RATE OF ABSORPTION FROM SKIN OF ANIMALS DEPENDS PRIMARILY UPON SIZE OF AREA INVOLVED & DURATION OF CONTACT. CONCN OF SOLN APPLIED WAS LESS IMPORTANT FACTOR.
[Patty, F. (ed.). Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology: Volume II: Toxicology. 2nd ed. New York: Interscience Publishers, 1963. 1372]**PEER REVIEWED**

RENAL EXCRETION IS PRINCIPAL ROUTE OF ELIMINATION. ... IN MAN 90% OF NON-TOXIC ORAL DOSE (0.01 MG/KG) OF (14)C-LABELED PHENOL WAS EXCRETED IN 24 HR, PRINCIPALLY AS SULFATE (77% OF THE EXCRETED LABEL) & AS GLUCURONIDE (16%), WITH SMALL AMT OF SULFATE & GLUCURONIDE CONJUGATES OF ... HYDROQUINONE. WITH LARGER DOSES, FREE (UNMETABOLIZED) PHENOL CAN PRESUMABLY BE FOUND IN URINE.
[Gosselin, R.E., R.P. Smith, H.C. Hodge. Clinical Toxicology of Commercial Products. 5th ed. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1984.,p. III-346]**PEER REVIEWED**

AFTER ABSORPTION INTO BODY ... TRACES OF "FREE" PHENOL ARE ELIMINATED WITH FECES & EXPIRED AIR.
[Clayton, G. D. and F. E. Clayton (eds.). Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology: Volume 2A, 2B, 2C: Toxicology. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley Sons, 1981-1982. 2571]**PEER REVIEWED**

In volunteers exposed to phenol vapor (5-25 mg/cu m) the retention of vapor in the lung decreased from ... 80 to 70% in the course of an 8 hr exposure. The absorption of vapor through the whole skin was approximately proportional to the concentration of vapor used, the absorption rate being somewhat lower than in the lung. Almost 100% of the excretion of phenol occured in the urine within 1 day.
[Piotrowski JK; Br J Ind Med 28: 172 (1971)]**PEER REVIEWED**

In man and all mammals that have been tested, nearly all of the phenol and its metabolites are excreted in the urine. Only minor amounts are excreted in air and in the feces.
[Deichmann WB, Keplinger ML; Indus Hyg Toxicol p.1363 (1963) as cited in USEPA; Ambient Water Quality Criteria Doc: Phenol p.C-19 (1980) EPA 440/5-80-066]**PEER REVIEWED**

The skin represents a primary route of entry for phenol vapor, liquid phenol, and solid phenol. Phenol vapor readily penetrates the skin with an absorption efficiency approximately equal to that of inhalation. Skin absorption can occur at low vapor concentrations.
[NIOSH; Criteria Document: Phenol p.138 (1976) DHEW Pub NIOSH 76-196]**PEER REVIEWED**

DATA ARE PRESENTED WHICH CORRELATE PHENOL LEVELS IN HUMAN URINE WITH INHALATORY & SKIN EXPOSURES. NORMAL PHENOL LEVELS IN HUMAN URINE ARE COMPARED WITH URINE LEVELS RESULTING FROM EXPOSURE TO PHENOL. A CORRELATION IS MADE BETWEEN URINE PHENOL LEVELS & POTENTIAL HUMAN TOXICITY.
[BRANCATO DJ; VET HUMAN TOXICOL 24 (FEB): 29-30 (1982)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Phenol is absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract and through the skin and mucous membranes. ... The metabolites are excreted in the urine.
[Reynolds, J.E.F., Prasad, A.B. (eds.) Martindale-The Extra Pharmacopoeia. 28th ed. London: The Pharmaceutical Press, 1982. 571]**PEER REVIEWED**

Subjects exposed to phenol vapor (without skin contact) in concn of 5-25 mg/cu m for a total of 7 hr daily retained 60-88% of the inhaled quantity. Retention ranged from 17.8-62.8 mg and an avg of 99% of this dose was excreted in the urine in 24 hr.
[Reynolds, J.E.F., Prasad, A.B. (eds.) Martindale-The Extra Pharmacopoeia. 28th ed. London: The Pharmaceutical Press, 1982. 571]**PEER REVIEWED**

A fraction of phenol may be excreted by the lung and imparts an aromatic odor to the breath.
[Haddad, L.M. and Winchester, J.F. Clinical Management of Poisoning and Drug Overdosage. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders Co., 1983. 810]**PEER REVIEWED**

Intoxication can occur after absorption through intact skin, or by ingestion.
[Gossel, T.A., J.D. Bricker. Principles of Clinical Toxicology. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Raven Press, Ltd., 1994. 222]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Biological Half-Life:

The excretion of phenol was studied in human volunteers exposed to phenol by inhalation or skin absorption. The human body behaved almost like a single compartment with respect to phenol absorption and clearance with an excretion rate constant of K= 0.2/hr This corresponds to a half-life of approximately 3.5 hours.
[Piotrowski JK; Br J Ind Med 28: 172 (1971) as cited in USEPA; Ambient Water Quality Criteria Doc: Phenol p.C-20 (1980) EPA 440/5-80-066]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Mechanism of Action:

Excessive doses of phenol in animals have been shown to depress the vasomotor center of the brain producing motor disturbances and blood changes of sufficient magnitude to induce cardiac arrest, respiratory failure, and coma followed by death.
[NIOSH; Criteria Document: Phenol p.62 (1976) DHEW Pub NIOSH 76-196]**PEER REVIEWED**

The effects of monoamine depletors and monoamine denervators on phenol induced tremor were studied in mice. The tremor induced by phenol was enhanced by pretreatment with reserpine or tetrabenazine, but not with syrosingopine. However, alpha-methyl-p-tyrosine, p-chlorophenylalanine or 6-hydroxydopamine did not affect the tremor. These results suggest that the depletion of central monoamines as a whole contribute to the enhancement of the tremor induced by phenol.
[Suzuki T, Kisara K; Pharmacol Biochem Behav 22 (1): 153-5 (1985)]**PEER REVIEWED**

... SOMETIMES THERE IS ONLY MILD PAIN OR DISCOMFORT BECAUSE PHENOL DEMYELINATES OR OTHERWISE DESTROYS MANY TYPES OF NERVE FIBERS.
[Gosselin, R.E., R.P. Smith, H.C. Hodge. Clinical Toxicology of Commercial Products. 5th ed. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1984.,p. III-344]**PEER REVIEWED**

Death immediately after poisoning ususally occurs from respiratory depression.
[Gossel, T.A., J.D. Bricker. Principles of Clinical Toxicology. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Raven Press, Ltd., 1994. 222]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Interactions:

CAMPHOR AND OTHER SUBSTANCES WITH SIMILAR PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROPERTIES INTERACT WITH PHENOL BOTH TO REDUCE ITS CORROSIVE PROPERTIES AND TO IMPEDE PERCUTANEOUS ABSORPTION. HOWEVER, SEVERE LOCAL NECROTIC DAMAGE & FATAL SYSTEMIC POISONING HAVE FOLLOWED USE OF THIS COMBINATION, WHICH WAS ONCE ENDORSED FOR "ATHLETE'S FOOT".
[Gosselin, R.E., R.P. Smith, H.C. Hodge. Clinical Toxicology of Commercial Products. 5th ed. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1984.,p. III-344]**PEER REVIEWED**

IN 27 CASES OF PHENOL POISONING BY MOUTH, 10% ETHANOL SOLN WAS JUDGED TO OFFER NO ADVANTAGE OVER WATER AS LAVAGE FLUID. INDEED, SYMPTOMS APPEARED TO BE MORE SEVERE WHEN PHENOL & ALCOHOL WERE INGESTED CONCOMITANTLY.
[Gosselin, R.E., R.P. Smith, H.C. Hodge. Clinical Toxicology of Commercial Products. 5th ed. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1984.,p. III-345]**PEER REVIEWED**

... LOCAL EFFECTS CAN BE STRONGLY MITIGATED BY PRESENCE OF ANY VEHICLE WITH AFFINITY FOR PHENOL. ...
[Gosselin, R.E., R.P. Smith, H.C. Hodge. Clinical Toxicology of Commercial Products. 5th ed. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1984.,p. III-344]**PEER REVIEWED**

Benzene induced myelotoxicity can be reproduced by the coadministration of two principal metabolites, phenol and hydroquinone. Coadministration of phenol (75 mg/kg) and hydroquinone (25-75 mg/kg) twice daily to B6C3F1 mice for 12 days resulted in a significant loss in bone marrow cellularity in a manner exhibiting a dose response. One explanation for this potentiation is that phenol stimulates the peroxidase dependent metabolism of hydroquinone. Addition of phenol to incubations containing horseradish peroxidase, hydrogen peroxide, and hydroquinone resulted in a stimulation of both hydroquinone removal and benzoquinone formation. Stimulation occurred with phenol as low as 100 uM and with very low concentrations of horseradish peroxidase. When boiled rat liver protein was added to identical incubations containing (14)C hydroquinone, the level of radioactivity recovered as protein bound increased by 37% when phenol was added. Similar results were observed when (14)C hydroquinone was incubated in the presence of activated human leukocytes. Hydroquinone binding was increased by approximately 70% in the presence of phenol. Phenol induced stimulation of hydroquinone metabolism and benzoquinone formation represents a likely explanation for the bone marrow suppression associated with benzene toxicity.
[Eastmond DA et al; Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 91 (1): 85-95 (1987)]**PEER REVIEWED**

It was found that phenol was not carcinogenic when applied repeatedly together with benzo(a)pyrene (BAP) since the carcinogenesis of BAP was slightly inhibited by coapplication.
[Van Duuren BL et al; J Natl Cancer Inst 46: 1039 (1973) as cited in USEPA; Ambient Water Quality Criteria Doc: Phenol p.32 (1980) EPA 440/5-80-066]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Pharmacology:

 

 

Therapeutic Uses:

Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Disinfectants; Sclerosing Solutions; Sympatholytics
[National Library of Medicine's Medical Subject Headings online file (MeSH, 1999)]**QC REVIEWED**

MEDICATION (VET): ANTISEPTIC CAUSTIC, TOPICALLY AS ANESTHETIC IN PRURITIC SKIN CONDITIONS.
[The Merck Index. 10th ed. Rahway, New Jersey: Merck Co., Inc., 1983. 1043]**QC REVIEWED**

MEDICATION (VET): PHENOL HAS BEEN USED INTERNALLY AS ANTISEPTIC & GASTRIC ANESTHETIC ...
[Rossoff, I.S. Handbook of Veterinary Drugs. New York: Springer Publishing Company, 1974. 443]**QC REVIEWED**

DISINFECTANT & ANTISEPTIC (PRIMARILY FORMER USE)
[SRI]**PEER REVIEWED**

/SRP: Former use:/ Phenol has been used for sclerosing hemorrhoids, but more effective and safer drugs are available. A 5% soln in glycerin is used in simple earache. ... Phenol is of some therapeutic value as a fungicide, but more effective & less toxic agents are available.
[Osol, A. (ed.). Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences. 16th ed. Easton, Pennsylvania: Mack Publishing Co., 1980. 1263]**PEER REVIEWED**

MEDICATION (VET): 2-5% CONCN IS RELIABLE DISINFECTANT AGAINST ERYSIPELOTHRIX RHUSIOPATHIAE EVEN IN PRESENCE OF MANURE; 0.75% KILLS CANINE DISTEMPER VIRUS IN LESS THAN 10 MIN; 0.2% KILLS ANAPLASMA ORGANISMS IN VACCINES; 2.5% IS FUNGICIDAL AGAINST A NUMBER OF ORGANISMS; & 5-10% IS USED OCCASIONALLY AS A PREMISE DISINFECTANT.
[Rossoff, I.S. Handbook of Veterinary Drugs. New York: Springer Publishing Company, 1974. 443]**QC REVIEWED**

IN MOUTHWASHES, HEMORRHOIDAL PREPN & BURN REMEDIES
[Osol, A. (ed.). Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences. 16th ed. Easton, Pennsylvania: Mack Publishing Co., 1980. 1263]**PEER REVIEWED**

MEDICATION (VET): 0.125 TO 1.0% CONCN ARE USED IN VACCINES, SERUMS & PARENTERALS AS PRESERVATIVE
[Rossoff, I.S. Handbook of Veterinary Drugs. New York: Springer Publishing Company, 1974. 443]**QC REVIEWED**

2-3% CONCN ALSO SERVE AS FLY REPELLANT & ARE FREQUENTLY FOUND IN LARGE ANIMAL WOUND TREATMENT PREPN
[Rossoff, I.S. Handbook of Veterinary Drugs. New York: Springer Publishing Company, 1974. 443]**PEER REVIEWED**

Phenol ... is a component (0.1-4.5 %) of various liquids, gels, ointments, & lotions (including phenolated calomine lotion), throat sprays, gargles, & lozenges. In most ... phenol is included as a local anesthetic for pruritis, stings, bites, burns, or sore throat, but some ... are labeled for antiseptic use.
[Gilman, A.G., L.S.Goodman, and A. Gilman. (eds.). Goodman and Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. 7th ed. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc., 1985. 970]**PEER REVIEWED**

/Phenol is a/ pharmaceutical necessity as a preservative for injections, etc.
[Osol, A. (ed.). Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences. 16th ed. Easton, Pennsylvania: Mack Publishing Co., 1980. 1263]**PEER REVIEWED**

Phenol 30-125 mg is admin intrathecally as a 5% w/w soln in glycerol ... for the alleviation of spasticity and severe intractable pain in malignant neoplasms ...
[Reynolds, J.E.F., Prasad, A.B. (eds.) Martindale-The Extra Pharmacopoeia. 28th ed. London: The Pharmaceutical Press, 1982. 571]**PEER REVIEWED**

AS PHARMACEUTIC AID (ANTIMICROBIAL AGENT)
[The Merck Index. 10th ed. Rahway, New Jersey: Merck Co., Inc., 1983. 1043]**PEER REVIEWED**

/Phenol is used in/ chemexfoliation (chemical peeling) ... to obtain both therapeutic (eg, actinic keratoses) and cosmetic (eg, removal of fine facial rhytides) benefits.
[Lober CW; J Am Acad Dermatol 17 (1): 109-12 (1987)]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Drug Warnings:

DIL PHENOL SOLN (1 TO 2%) ARE USED MEDICINALLY AS ANTIPRURITIC PREPN FOR THE SKIN. THEIR REPEATED USE OVER LARGE SKIN AREAS OR ON PARTICULARLY MOIST AREAS (AXILLARY REGION, GROIN, FEET) SHOULD BE AVOIDED.
[Gosselin, R.E., R.P. Smith, H.C. Hodge. Clinical Toxicology of Commercial Products. 5th ed. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1984.,p. III-344]**PEER REVIEWED**

Soln of phenol (6%) in glycerine are sometimes employed in medical practice to produce nerve blocks. The spread of phenol beyond the intended site (stellate ganglion) resulted in infarction on the cervical cord with extensive paralysis in one patient and neurolosis of the cervical posterior roots with respiratory arrest in another.
[Gosselin, R.E., R.P. Smith, H.C. Hodge. Clinical Toxicology of Commercial Products. 5th ed. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1984.,p. III-344]**PEER REVIEWED**

... Phenol ... should be applied only on small areas of skin and occlusive dressings, bandages, or diapers should not be used.
[American Medical Association, Department of Drugs. Drug Evaluations. 6th ed. Chicago, Ill: American Medical Association, 1986. 1527]**PEER REVIEWED**

Phenol should never be used in pregnant women, in infants under 6 mo, or for diaper rash.
[American Medical Association, Department of Drugs. Drug Evaluations. 6th ed. Chicago, Ill: American Medical Association, 1986. 1527]**PEER REVIEWED**

The development of widespread Herpes simplex on the face after phenolic face peels is not considered rare. Precaution in choosing patients is recommended. Four cases of acute exacerbation of Herpes simplex are presented in patients who had recently undergone phenolic face peels.
[Rapaport MJ, Kamer F; J Dermatol Surg Oncol 10 (1): 57-8 (1984)]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Interactions:

CAMPHOR AND OTHER SUBSTANCES WITH SIMILAR PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROPERTIES INTERACT WITH PHENOL BOTH TO REDUCE ITS CORROSIVE PROPERTIES AND TO IMPEDE PERCUTANEOUS ABSORPTION. HOWEVER, SEVERE LOCAL NECROTIC DAMAGE & FATAL SYSTEMIC POISONING HAVE FOLLOWED USE OF THIS COMBINATION, WHICH WAS ONCE ENDORSED FOR "ATHLETE'S FOOT".
[Gosselin, R.E., R.P. Smith, H.C. Hodge. Clinical Toxicology of Commercial Products. 5th ed. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1984.,p. III-344]**PEER REVIEWED**

IN 27 CASES OF PHENOL POISONING BY MOUTH, 10% ETHANOL SOLN WAS JUDGED TO OFFER NO ADVANTAGE OVER WATER AS LAVAGE FLUID. INDEED, SYMPTOMS APPEARED TO BE MORE SEVERE WHEN PHENOL & ALCOHOL WERE INGESTED CONCOMITANTLY.
[Gosselin, R.E., R.P. Smith, H.C. Hodge. Clinical Toxicology of Commercial Products. 5th ed. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1984.,p. III-345]**PEER REVIEWED**

... LOCAL EFFECTS CAN BE STRONGLY MITIGATED BY PRESENCE OF ANY VEHICLE WITH AFFINITY FOR PHENOL. ...
[Gosselin, R.E., R.P. Smith, H.C. Hodge. Clinical Toxicology of Commercial Products. 5th ed. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1984.,p. III-344]**PEER REVIEWED**

Benzene induced myelotoxicity can be reproduced by the coadministration of two principal metabolites, phenol and hydroquinone. Coadministration of phenol (75 mg/kg) and hydroquinone (25-75 mg/kg) twice daily to B6C3F1 mice for 12 days resulted in a significant loss in bone marrow cellularity in a manner exhibiting a dose response. One explanation for this potentiation is that phenol stimulates the peroxidase dependent metabolism of hydroquinone. Addition of phenol to incubations containing horseradish peroxidase, hydrogen peroxide, and hydroquinone resulted in a stimulation of both hydroquinone removal and benzoquinone formation. Stimulation occurred with phenol as low as 100 uM and with very low concentrations of horseradish peroxidase. When boiled rat liver protein was added to identical incubations containing (14)C hydroquinone, the level of radioactivity recovered as protein bound increased by 37% when phenol was added. Similar results were observed when (14)C hydroquinone was incubated in the presence of activated human leukocytes. Hydroquinone binding was increased by approximately 70% in the presence of phenol. Phenol induced stimulation of hydroquinone metabolism and benzoquinone formation represents a likely explanation for the bone marrow suppression associated with benzene toxicity.
[Eastmond DA et al; Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 91 (1): 85-95 (1987)]**PEER REVIEWED**

It was found that phenol was not carcinogenic when applied repeatedly together with benzo(a)pyrene (BAP) since the carcinogenesis of BAP was slightly inhibited by coapplication.
[Van Duuren BL et al; J Natl Cancer Inst 46: 1039 (1973) as cited in USEPA; Ambient Water Quality Criteria Doc: Phenol p.32 (1980) EPA 440/5-80-066]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Minimum Fatal Dose Level:

Ingestion of as little as 4.8 g of pure phenol caused death in 10 min.
[NIOSH; Criteria Document: Phenol p.65 (1976) DHEW Pub NIOSH 76-196]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Environmental Fate & Exposure:

 

 

Environmental Fate/Exposure Summary:

Phenol is an important industrial chemical and enters the environment in air emissions, wastewater and spills connected with its use as a chemical intermediate, disinfectant and antiseptic. It is frequently found in industrial wastewater. It is also released by wood stoves, in vehicle exhaust and other anthropogenic processes. Phenol is naturally produced in decaying organic matter. If released to the environment, phenol's primary removal mechanism is biodegradation which is generally rapid (days). Since phenol is a benchmark chemical for biodegradability studies, there is a large body of information on its degradation which concludes that phenol rapidly degrades in sewage, soil, fresh water and seawater. Acclimation of resident populations of microorganisms is rapid. Under anaerobic conditions degradation is slower and microbial adaptation periods longer. If phenol is released to soil, it will readily leach and biodegrade. The biodegradation in soil is generally rapid with half-lives of under 5 days even in subsurface soils. Biodegradation is sufficiently rapid that most groundwater is generally free of this pollutant. The exception would be in the cases of spills where high concentrations of phenol destroy degrading microbial populations. Biodegradation is also the primary removal process for phenol released into water (half-lives are of the order of hours to days) although sensitized photolysis may also be important. In one study using estuarine water, the combination of biodegradation and photolysis resulted in a half-life in summer and winter of 39 and 94 hr, respectively. Since the pKa of phenol is 9.994, it will be partially dissociated at higher pHs in water and moist soils and its transport and reactivity may be pH-dependent. Phenol does not bioconcentrate in aquatic organisms. In the atmosphere, phenol occurs as a vapor and reacts with photochemically-produced hydroxyl radicals resulting in a half-life of approximately 15 hours. During the nighttime, it reacts with nitrate radicals with a resulting half-life of 12 minutes. Phenol has also been shown to be readily removed from the atmosphere by rain. Occupational exposure to phenol is primarily by dermal contact as well as by inhalation. Gloves are often permeable to this chemical and do not protect the worker. The general population is exposed via inhalation of ambient air, ingestion of food and lozenges and dermal contact with disinfects and other consumer products containing phenol. (SRC)
**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Probable Routes of Human Exposure:

WITH RARE EXCEPTIONS, HUMAN EXPOSURE IN INDUST HAS BEEN LIMITED TO ACCIDENTAL CONTACT OF PHENOL WITH SKIN OR INHALATION OF PHENOL VAPORS.
[Clayton, G. D. and F. E. Clayton (eds.). Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology: Volume 2A, 2B, 2C: Toxicology. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley Sons, 1981-1982. 2567]**PEER REVIEWED**

NIOSH (NOES Survey 1981-1983) has statistically estimated that 320,914 workers are exposed to phenol in the USA(1). Eighty percent of these exposures are to trade name products containing phenol. Phenol was detected in the general work atmosphere of a brake pad assembly plant in New Holstein, WI - 0.025 and 0.042 ppm(3). The concn of phenol in bakerlite factories was reported to be 12.5 mg/cu m(2). Phenol was measured in the atmosphere of a dental school laboratory in Philadelphia, PA during dissection of cadavers at 1.3-5.0 parts per trillion(4). A study of exposure levels during 25 embalmings found that exposure to phenol was <0.5 ppm(5). The area air concn of phenol during paint stripping operations on a Boeing 747 aircraft (120-330 min sampling periods, n=9) was 3.4-9.5 mg/cu m with a mean of 5.7 mg/cu m(6). For an 8-hr shift, the exposure levels were 1.1-5.3 mg/cu m with a mean of 2.7 mg/cu m(6).
[(1) NIOSH; National Occupational Exposure Survey (1989) (2) USEPA; Ambient Water Quality Criteria Phenol page C-11 USEPA 440/5-80-066 (PB 81-17772) (1980) (3) Almaguer D; Health Hazard Evaluation Report No. HETA-85-048-049-1658 p. 13 (1986) (4) Boiano JM; Health Hazard Evaluation Report No, HETA-84-098-1497 p 16 (1984) (5) Stewart PA et al; Occup Environ Hyg 7:532-40 (1992) (6) Vincent R et al; Int Arch Occup Environ Health 65: 377-80 (1994)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Protective gloves may be permeable to phenol. The breakthrough times and permeation rates of 5 mil thicknesses of five common glove materials to solid phenol were (material, breakthrough time (min), steady state permeation rates (ug/min/sq cm): latex, 10.4, 0.0151; PVC, 10.6, membrane solubilized; polyurethane, 28.0, 0.233; neoprene, 21.0, 0.201; polynitrile, 185.0, 0.0114(1).
[(1) Fricker C, Hardy JK; Am, Ind Hyg Assoc J 53: 745-50 (1992)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Workplace exposure to phenol will occur via inhalation and dermal absorption of phenol-containing wastewater, emissions and disinfectants or solvents. The general population may be exposed to phenol by ingesting food or medicinal products such as throat lozenges. They will also be exposed by inhalation of ambient air and cigarette smoke and dermal absorption of phenol contained in decomposing organic matter and disinfectants and other consumer products(SRC).
[(1) Graedel TE; Chemical Compounds in the Atmosphere p. 256 (1978)]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Body Burden:

Identified, but not quantified, in 9 of 12 samples of breath in Bayonne and Elizabeth, NJ as part of the Total Exposure Assessment Methodology (TEAM) study(1).
[(1) Wallace LA; Toxicol Environ Chem 12: 215-36 (1986)]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Average Daily Intake:

WATER INTAKE: Insufficient data; AIR INTAKE: (assume typical concn in indoor air of 0.70 ug/cu m) 14 ug; FOOD INTAKE: Insufficient data.
[(1) Kostianen R; Atmos Environ 29: 693-702 (1995)]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Natural Pollution Sources:

Phenol is present in animal, leaf litter and other organic wastes as a result of decomposition(1-3). The level of phenol present in poultry manure has been shown to increase in time as degradation proceeds(2).
[(1) USEPA; Treatability Manual page I.8.1-1 to 1-5. USEPA-600/2-82-001A (l981) (2) Yashuhara A; J Chromatogr 387: 371-8 (1987) (3) Peters GT, Cowell FS; Hydrobiologia 174: 79-87 (1989)]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Artificial Pollution Sources:

Phenol is produced in large quantities for use as a chemical intermediate in the production of bisphenol-A, phenolic resins, caprolactam, aniline, alkylphenols and other chemicals, as well as a disinfectant and antiseptic(1,2) and may be released to the environment as emissions and in wastewater as a result of its production and use(SRC). Wood smoke from fireplaces and wood stoves contain high concns of phenol and would be expected to be a major source of phenol in winter air in northern cities(6). Phenol is found in gasoline and diesel engine exhaust and it was estimated that 3600 kg of phenol were emitted each day in Los Angeles from these sources during the summer of 1987(3). It is found in cigarette smoke, and emissions from refuse combustion, brewing, foundries, wood pulping, plastics mfg, lacquer mfg, and glass fibre mfg(4). Laboratory tests indicate that phenol would be found in leachate from tires(5). It is also released from some plastics when heated (e.g., micarta emissions 34% phenol when heated to 280 deg C)(7). Phenol is a photooxidation product of benzene(4) and would be produced in the atmosphere from benzene emissions(SRC).
[(1) Budavari D; The Merck Index 11th ed Rahway, NJ: Merck & Co Inc p 1150 (1989) (2) Jordan W et al; pp 309 in Ullmann's Encycl Indust Chem A19 NY: VCH Publishers (1991) (3) Harley RA, Cass GR; Environ Sci Technol 28: 88-98 (1994) (4) Graedel TE et al (eds); Atmospheric Chemical Compounds NY: Academic Press (1986) (5) Nelson SM et al; Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 52: 574-81 (1994) (6) Hawthorne SB et al; Environ Sci Technol 26: 2251-62 (1992) (7) Kalman DA; Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 47: 270-5 (1986)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Phenol is obtained from coal tar.
[Cleland JG, Kingsbury, GL; Multimedia Environmental Goals For Environmental Assessment. I, E-182, 1977]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Environmental Fate:

TERRESTRIAL FATE: Based on a recommended classification scheme(4), experimentally determined Koc values for phenol(1-3) indicate that it would be highly mobile in soil and may leach. Phenol's vapor pressure, 0.350 mm Hg at 25 deg C(5) and low adsorptivity to soil indicate that volatilization from dry soil and other surfaces may occur(6,SRC). Phenol will be primarily removed from soil as a result of biodegradation. Despite its high mobility in soil, biodegradation is sufficiently rapid that most groundwater is generally free of phenol(7). The half-lives of phenol in soil is usually <5 days, even in subsurface soil and aquifer material(7-11), although for acid soils and some surface soils the half-life may be of the order of 20-25 days(9,11) and in the case of a till subsoil, 116 days(11). Radiolabeled phenol was rapidly released from soil in a environmental standard system; after 1 day, half of the label was found in the air phase as a result of mineralization(13). Degradation will be slower under anaerobic conditions than under aerobic conditions and acclimation times will also be longer(12). Phenol may also be removed from soil as a result of surface-catalyzed reaction or oxidative processes that are not well understood(14). Phenol is sensitive to indirect photolysis(15,16) and these reactions may be expected to occur on the soil surface(SRC).
[(1) Artiola-Fortuny J, Fuller WH; Soil Sci 133: 18-26 (1982) (2) Scott HD et al; J Environ Qual 12: 91-5 (1983) (3) Briggs GG; J Agric Food Chem 29: 1050-9 (1981) (4) Swann RL et al; Res Rev 85: 23 (1983) (5) Jones AH; J Chem Eng Data 5: 196-200 (1960) (6) Lyman WJ et al; Handbook of Chemical Property Estimation Methods. NY: McGraw-Hill Chapt 16 (1982) (7) Ehrlich GG et al; Groundwater 20: 703-10 (1982) (8) Scott HD et al; J Environ Qual 12: 91-5 (1983) (9) Shiu WY et al; Chemosphere 29: 1155-24 (1994) (10) Baker MD, Mayfield CI; Water Air Soil Pollut 13: 411 (1980) (11) Konopka A, Turco R; Appl Environ Microbiol 57: 2260-68 (1991) (12) Healy JB Jr, Young LY; Food Microbiol Toxicol 35: 216-8 (1978) (13) Shiu WY et al; Chemosphere 29: 1155-24 (1994) (14) Baker MD, Mayfield CI; Water Air Soil Pollut 13: 411 (1980) (15) Tratnyek PG, Holgne J; Environ Sci Technol 25: 1596-1604 (1991) (16) Mill T, Mabey W; p. 208-11 in Environmental Exposure from Chemicals Vol I, Neely WR, Blau GE eds Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press (1985)]**PEER REVIEWED**

AQUATIC FATE: Because the pKa of phenol is 9.994(7), it will be partially dissociated at higher pHs and therefore, its transport and reactivity may be pH dependent(SRC). Based on a recommended classification scheme(4), experimentally determined Koc values for phenol(1,2,3) indicate that it would not adsorb to sediment and particulate matter in the water column(SRC). Phenol would not volatilize from water based on its Henry's Law constant of 3.33X10-7 atm-cu m/mole(5). Its estimated volatilization half-life in a model river is 107 days(6). Removal will be primarily a result of biodegradation with complete degradation occurring in a few days(13,14). Degradation is slower in salt water; the degradation half-life in an estuarine river was 9 days)(12). Phenol may undergo indirect photolysis in natural waters due to reaction with transients generated by the absorption of sunlight by, for example, dissolved natural organic matter and flavins(15-18). Photolysis rates range widely and depend on the intensity of sunlight, concentration and nature of humic materials and photosensitzers present in the water and pH(SRC); phenolate ions are more readily oxidized than undissociated phenol and therefore rates will increase with pH(15). According to a recommended classification scheme(11), the low reported BCF values for phenol(8,9) and its rapid elimination(10) suggest that bioaccumulation of phenol is not an important fate process(SRC).
[(1) Artiola-Fortuny J, Fuller WH; Soil Sci 133: 18-26 (1982) (2) Scott HD et al; J Environ Qual 12: 91-5 (1983) (3) Briggs GG; J Agric Food Chem 29: 1050-9 (1981) (4) Swann RL et al; Res Rev 85: 23 (1983) (5) Gaffney JS et al; Environ Sci Technol 21: 519-24 (1987) (6) Lyman WJ et al; Handbook of Chemical Property Estimation Methods. NY: McGraw-Hill Chapt 15 (1982) (7) Serjeant EP, Dempsey B; Ionization Constants of Organic Acids in Aqueous Solution. IUPAC Chemical Data Series, NY,NY: Pergamon Press p. 160 (1979) (8) Kobayashi K et al; Bull Jap Soc Sci Fish 45: 173-5 (1979) (9) Freitag D et al; p 119 in: QSAR Environ Toxicol Proc Workshop Quant Struct-Act Relat. Kaiser KLE ed Reidel: Netherlands (1984) (10) Nagel R, Urich K Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 24: 374-8 (1980) (11) Franke C et al; Chemosphere 29: 1501-14 (1994) (12) Lee RF, Ryan C; Microbial Degradation of Pollutants in Marine Environments p 443-50 EPA-600/9-79-012 (1979) (13) Rubin HE, Alexander M; Environ Sci Tech 17: 104-7 (1983) (14) Ludzack FJ, Ettinger MB; J Water Pollut Control Fed 32: 1173-200 (1960) (15) Tratnyek PG, Holgne J; Environ Sci Technol 25: 1596-1604 (1991) (16) Mill T, Mabey W; p. 208-11 in Environmental Exposure from Chemicals Vol I, Neely WR, Blau GE eds Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press (1985) (17) Larson RA et al; Environ Technol Chem 8: 1165-70 (1989) (18) Tatsumi K et al; J Contaminant Hydrology 9: 207-19 (1992)]**PEER REVIEWED**

AQUATIC FATE: The rates of photolysis and microbial degradation in summer (24 deg C, midday surface irradiance 4.9 E/sq m-hr) and winter (10 deg C, midday surface irradiance 2.9 E/sq m-hr) were determined in estuarine water using ring-UL-14C-labeled phenol in a flask suspended 3 cm below the surface of water in an outdoor tank of circulating estuarine water(1). The transformation rate constants and half-lives of phenol in estuarine water, exposed to light and in the dark, were (sample description, transformation rate in 1/hr, half-life in hrs: summer/light, 0.018, 39; winter/light, 0.0074, 94; summer/dark, 0.03, 28; winter/dark, 0.011, 62(1). The respective mineralization (CO2 appearance) rate constants and half-lives of phenol in estuarine water, exposed to light and in the dark, were (sample description, mineralization rate in 1/day. half-life in days: summer/light, 0.095, 7; winter/light, 0.010, 73; summer/dark, 0.4, 2; winter/dark, 0.0051, 136(1). Therefore microbial degradation is the primary transformation process in estuarine waters. The biodegradation half-lives of phenol in river water and harbor water have been reported to be 264 and 72 hours, respectively(2). An overall degradative half-life of 55 hours has been suggested for phenol in water(2).
[(1) Hwang HM et al; Environ Sci Technol 20: 1002-7 (1986) (2) Shiu WY et al; Chemosphere 29: 1155-24 (1994)]**PEER REVIEWED**

ATMOSPHERIC FATE: According to a model of gas/particle partitioning of semivolatile organic compounds in the atmosphere(1), phenol, which has a vapor pressure of 0.350 mm Hg at 25 deg C(2) will exist in the vapor phase in the ambient atmosphere(SRC). Vapor-phase phenol is degraded in the atmosphere by reaction with photochemically-produced hydroxyl radicals during the day and nitrate radicals at night(SRC); the half-lives for these reactions in air is estimated as 14.6 hours and 12 minutes, respectively(3,SRC). Phenol has a low Henry's Law constant which explains why it is so effectively scavenged from the air by rain(6). Its presence in rainwater has been confirmed by several investigators(4-6). Its concn in rain has been shown to decrease markedly as the rain event progresses(6).
[(1) Bidleman TF; Environ Sci Technol 22: 361-367 (1988) (2) Jones AH; J Chem Eng Data 5: 196-200 (1960) (3) Atkinson R; J Chem Phys Ref Data Monograph 2, p 56 (1994) (4) Hart KM et al; Water Air Soil Pollut 68: 91-112 (1993) (6) Leuenberger C et al; Environ Sci Technol 19: 1053-8 (1985) (7) Levson K et al; Chemosphere 21: 1037-61 (1990)]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Environmental Biodegradation:

SCREENING TESTS: Phenol is a benchmark chemical in screening tests and there is abundant data to indicate that phenol biodegrades fast in aerobic screening tests using a variety of techniques and inocula, including acclimated and unacclimated activated sludge, sewage, and soil(SRC). Only selected results are included here. In a 2-week biodegradation screening test (MITI test) using phenol (100 ppm) and an activated sludge inoculum, 85% of BOD was removed(1). Phenol was completely removed in 1 day or less using a soil suspension(2) or activated sludge inocula(3,6). Complete degradation was observed in 4 days using sediment from an oil refinery settling pond as an inoculum(4). It was shown that the presence of aromatic compounds like benzene and naphthalene had a mild inhibitory effect on degradation(4). In five days, the BOD consumed was 90% and 50% of theoretical using a sewage inoculum and freshwater and seawater, respectively(5). Another investigator who obtained 80% of theoretical BOD consumed after 5 days demonstrated that adaptation of the inoculum has a marked effect on the biodegradation rate(8). Decreasing the concn of phenol significantly reduces the lag time required to initiate degradation and increases the removal rate(9). The maximum mineralization rates of phenol in sewage and landfill leachate were 6.5X10-4 and 2.7X10-4 1/hr, respectively(7). A lag period was observed in landfill leachate.
[(1) Chemicals Inspection and Testing Institute; Biodegradation and bioaccumulation data of existing chemicals based on the CSCL Japan. Japan Chemical Industry Ecology-Toxicology and Information Center p. 3-46, ISBN 4-89074-101-1 (1992) (2) Alexander M, Lustigman BK; J Agric Food Chem 14: 410-3 (1966) (3) Baird RB et al; Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 2: 165-78 (1974) (4) Meyer JS et al; Environ Toxicol Chem 3: 583-7 (1984) (5) Price KS et al; J Water Pollut Contr Fed 46: 63-77 (1974) (6) Yonezawa Y et al; Kogai Shigen Kenkyusho Iho 15: 75-86 (1985) (7) Deeley GM et al; Appl Environ Microbiol 49: 867-9 (1985) (8) Heukelekian H, Rand MC; J Water Pollut Contr Assoc 29: 1040-53 (1955) (9) Callahan MA et al; Water-Related Fate of 129 Priority Pollutants Vol II Chap 83 USEPA-440/4-79-029B (1979)]**PEER REVIEWED**

BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT SIMULATIONS: Phenol readily biodegrades in biological treatment plants; removals in an aerobic activated sludge reactor (retention time of 8 hr)(3) and a continuous reactor(6) was close to 100%. Partial inhibition has been noted at concentrations as low as 50 ppm in aerobic reactors using industrial wastewater seed and activated sludge seed(4). In a semi-continuous activated sludge (SCAS) test with phenol, 39% of theoretical BOD was consumed in 12 hr(1). The COD reduction ranged from 60-99% in a test using a biofilm reactor with a 0.9 hr retention time(2). Phenol was also completely removed in an artificial recharge pilot plant(5). In a monitoring study of 37 water pollution control plants in Ontario, Canada, the concn of phenol was markedly reduced both in number of detections and concn after more progressive stages of treatment (i.e, primary, secondary, tertiary)(7).
[(1) McKinney RE et al; Sew Ind Wastes 28: 547-57 (1956) (2) Stratton RG et al; J Am Water Works Assoc 75:463-9 (1983) (3) Stover EL, Kincannon DF; J Water Pollut Control Fed 55: 97-109 (1983) (4) Davis EM et al; Water Res 15: 1125-7 (1981) (5) Rizet M et al; Prog Water Technol 9:203-15 (1977) (6) Mills RE; Can J Chem Eng 37: 117-83 (1959) (7) Canviro Consultants; Thirty seven municipal water pollution control plants, pilot monitoring study, Vol 1. Interim report, Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Water Resources Branch, ISBN 0-7729-4900-X (1988)]**PEER REVIEWED**

ANAEROBIC BIODEGRADATION: Phenol completely biodegraded in a test to determine its anaerobic biodegradation potential under methanogenic conditions(1). Gas production increased rapidly after a 6 day lag period. The laboratory test was performed at 35 deg C in serum bottles using an anaerobic digester sludge inoculum in which total gas production was measured over at least a 60 day period. Sterile controls were used to correct for abiotic gas production. Another investigator obtained 100% degradation in 28 days with an 18 day lag; on redose, complete degradation was obtained in 10 days with no lag(2). In 14 days, 100, 91, and 99% mineralization of phenol was obtained on incubation with 3 digester sludges(3,4).
[(1) Battersby NS, Wilson V; Appl Environ Microbiol 55: 433-9 (1989) (2) Healy JB Jr, Young LY; Food Microbiol Toxicol 35: 216-8 (1978) (3) Boyd SA et al; Appl Environ Microbiol 46: 50-4 (1983) (4) Horowitz A et al; Dev Ind Microbiol 23: 435-44 (1982)]**PEER REVIEWED**

WATER/SEDIMENT: Phenol completely mineralized in <1 day in water from 3 lakes; rates increase with increasing concns of phenol and the organic content of the water (e.g., degraded faster in an eutrophic lake than an oligotropic one(3). It was completely removed in river water after 2 days at 20 deg C and after 4 days at 4 deg C(4). Degradation is slower in salt water; the degradation rate in the estuarine Skidway River, GA was 0.079/hr (half-life 9 days)(1). Laboratory tests were conducted to ascertain the seasonal mineralization of trace levels of 14C-phenol by heterotrophic microorganisms in seston and surface sediment at four sites in southwestern Virginia(2). The mean turnover rates for the four sites between April and May 1986 at 10 deg C were 0.015, 0.023, 0.023, and 0.064 1/hr-mg sediment ash-free dry wt (AFDW). Mineralization reached a maximum of 1.21X10-4 to 1.16X10-3 mg phenol mineralized/mg AFDW-hr in October, an increase of 92-625% for seston samples and 46-128% for sediment samples over baseline August levels, despite decreasing stream temperatures. This autumnal peak in phenol degradation is attributed to the pulsed input of allochthonous detritus, especially leaf litter which contains substantial quantities of phenol and related compounds(2).
[(1) Lee RF, Ryan C; Microbial Degradation of Pollutants in Marine Environments p 443-50 USEPA-600/9-79-012 (1979) (2) Peters GT, Cowell FS; Hydrobiologia 174: 79-87 (1989) (3) Rubin HE, Alexander M; Environ Sci Tech 17: 104-7 (1983) (4) Ludzack FJ, Ettinger MB; J Water Pollut Control Fed 32: 1173-200 (1960)]**PEER REVIEWED**

SOIL: Phenol degradation in soil is completed in 2-5 days, even in subsurface soils(5). The percent mineralization in an alkaline, para-brown soil under aerobic conditions was 45.5%, 48%, and 65% after 3, 7, and 70 days, respectively(1). Half-lives for degr of low concn of phenol in Captina (pH 5.7, 1.1% organic matter) and Palouse silt loam (pH 5.7, 3.6% organic matter) soils were 2.70 and 3.51 hrs(2). Its disappearance from a Chernozem soil increased from 10 to 110 days as the concn of phenol increased from 1000 to 9000 ppm(4). The biodegradation half-life in acidic and basic soil has been reported to be 552 and 98.4 hr, respectively(3). The biodegradation of phenol in subsurface under a typical Midwest agricultural soil was studied by determining rates in strata of a 26-m bore(6). Phenol biodegraded rapidly (within 0-1 day) in samples from the aquifer capillary fringe, saturated zone, and surface soil; lag periods and lower rates were found in till samples. The half-lives and lag times were (sample, half-life, lag): surface layers (<2 m) 2.8-4.6 days, 0-1 day lag; aquifer (>23 m), 1.0-3.5 days, 0 days lag; till (12 m), 116 days, 16 day lag; subsoil (8 m), 21 days, 2 day lag(6).
[(1) Haider K et al; Arch Microbiol 96:183-200 (1974) (2) Scott HD et al; J Environ Qual 12: 91-5 (1983) (3) Shiu WY et al; Chemosphere 29: 1155-24 (1994) (4) Medvedev V et al; Pochvovedenie 6: 128-31 (1975) (5) Baker MD, Mayfield CI; Water Air Soil Pollut 13: 411 (1980) (6) Konopka A, Turco R; Appl Environ Microbiol 57: 2260-68 (1991)]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Environmental Abiotic Degradation:

The rate constant for the vapor-phase reaction of phenol with photochemically produced hydroxyl radicals is 2.63X10-11 cu cm/molecule-sec at 25 deg C(2). This corresponds to an atmospheric half-life of 14.6 hours at an atmospheric concentration of 5X10+5 hydroxyl radicals per cu cm(SRC). The rate constant for the vapor-phase reaction of phenol with nitrate radicals is 3.92X10-12 cu cm/molecule-sec at 23 deg C(1,2). This corresponds to a half-life of 12 minutes at a nitrate radical concn of 2.4X10+8 per cu cm (over continental areas). The reaction with nitrate radicals is only important during the nighttime. In the presence of nitrogen oxides, 2-nitrophenol is formed in these reactions at a yield of 0.067 and 0.251 for the reaction with hydroxyl radicals and nitrate radicals, respectively(1).
[(1) Atkinson R et al; Environ Sci Technol 26: 1397-1403 (1992) (2) Atkinson R; J Chem Phys Ref Data Monograph 2, p 56 (1994)]**PEER REVIEWED**

The pKa of phenol is 9.994(1). Therefore, phenol will be partially dissociated at the upper end of environmental pH range (e.g., 1% of phenol will be dissociated at pH 8 and 10% at pH 9) and its reactivity may be pH dependent(SRC). Phenol does not absorb UV radiation >290 nm(6) and therefore in the absence of photosensitizers, phenol is not susceptible to direct photolysis by sunlight(SRC). The phenolate ion absorbs light more strongly and at longer wavelengths than phenol(7) and therefore may be susceptible to direct photolysis(SRC). Phenol may undergo indirect photolysis in natural waters due to reaction with transients generated by the absorption of sunlight by, for example, dissolved natural organic matter; some of the oxidants that have been identified include hydroxyl radicals, peroxy radicals(4), singlet oxygen(2) and reactive excited triplet states(5). Typical half-lives for hydroxyl and peroxy radical reactions are on the order of 100 and 19.2 hrs of sunlight, respectively(4). Phenolate ions are more readily oxidized than undissociated phenol and therefore rates will increase with pH(2). The rate constant of phenolate ion and phenol with singlet oxygen are 1.55X10+8 L/mol-sec and 2.6X10+6, respectively(2). Assuming a near surface concn of singlet oxygen of 2X10-13 mol/L(3), the half-lives of the phenolate ion and undissociated phenol would respectively be 6.2 hr and 370 hr(SRC). Another investigator estimated the half-life for reaction of phenol with photochemically-produced singlet oxygen in surface waters contaminated by humic substances as 83 days (assuming Switzerland summer sunlight and singlet oxygen concn 4x10-14 mol/L)(8).
[(1) Serjeant EP, Dempsey B; Ionization Constants of Organic Acids in Aqueous Solution. IUPAC Chemical Data Series, NY,NY: Pergamon Press p. 160 (1979) (2) Tratnyek PG, Holgne J; Environ Sci Technol 25: 1596-1604 (1991) (3) Tratnyek PG et al; Sci Tot Environ 109/110: 327-41 (1991) (4) Mill T, Mabey W; p. 208-11 in Environmental Exposure from Chemicals Vol I, Neely WR, Blau GE eds Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press (1985) (5) Canonica S et al; Environ Sci Technol 29: 1822-31 (1995) (6) Sadtler Index 258 UV (7) Drahonovsky J, Vacek Z; Collect Czech Chem Commun 36: 3431-40 (1971) (8) Scull FE Jr, Hoigne J; Chemosphere 16: 681-94 (1987)]**PEER REVIEWED**

The rates of photolysis in summer (24 deg C, midday surface irradiance 4.9 E/sq m-hr) and winter (10 deg C, midday surface irradiance 2.9 E/sq m-hr) were determined in distilled water and poisoned estuarine water, both at pH 7.7, using ring-UL-14C-labeled phenol in a flask suspended 3 cm below the surface of water in an outdoor tank of circulating estuarine water(3). The transformation rate constants and half-lives in distilled and estuarine water were (sample description, transformation rate in 1/hr, half-life in hr: distilled water (summer), 0.015, 46; distilled water (winter), 0.0040, 173; estuarine water (summer), 0.016, 43; estuarine water (winter), 0.006, 118(3). The corresponding mineralization (CO2 appearance) rate constants and half-lives in distilled and estuarine water were (sample description, mineralization rate in 1/day, half-life in day: distilled water (summer), 0.04, 16; distilled water (winter), 0.0041, 169; estuarine water (summer), 0.04, 16; estuarine water (winter), 0.0063, 110(3). Riboflavin and other flavins and their more stable photodegradation products (i.e., lumichrome) are photosensitizers which may be present in sea water and lake water(2). The disappearance of phenol in a photoreactor (light >290 nm) in the presence of riboflavin at pH 5, 7, 9, and 11 was rapid with approximately 53, 38, 23, and 18% degradation occurring respectively in 1 minute. Generally midday summer sunlight photolysis rate constants at Urbana, IL are approximately one-half of those determined in the photoreactor(1). In another experiment using light from a solar simulator, the pseudo first-order rate constants of lumichrome- sensitized photolysis of phenol was 2.2, 3.5, and 17.0/min at pH 7.0, 8.0 and 9.0, respectively(2).
[(1) Larson RA et al; Environ Technol Chem 8: 1165-70 (1989) (2) Tatsumi K et al; J Contaminant Hydrology 9: 207-19 (1992) (3) Hwang HM et al; Environ Sci Technol 20: 1002-7 (1986)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Phenol has been reported to degrade in water-washed sterile silica sand at a rate which increases with increasing temperature and decreases with time(1). After 8 days, approximately 10, 15, and 85% of phenol was removed at 4, 26 and 60 deg C, respectively. The loss could not be a result of volatilization or photolysis since the flasks were sealed and incubated in the dark. It was postulated that the loss was a result of a surface-catalyzed reaction or an oxidative process(1).
[(1) Baker MD, Mayfield CI; Water Air Soil Pollut 13: 411 (1980)]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Environmental Bioconcentration:

The BCFs reported in aquatic organisms include: goldfish, (Carassius auratus), 1.9(1); fish (unspecified), 17(7); fish (unspecified), 1.7(10); water flea (Daphnia magna), 277(2); golden orfe, 20, algae (Clorella fusca), 200(3); freshwater phytoplankter (Scenedesmus quadricauda), 3.5(4). Phenol was rapidly eliminated from goldfish(8) and therefore would be unlikely to bioaccumulate(SRC). When U-14C-phenol was interperitonially administered to goldfish, the concn decreased to one tenth the initial concn in 2 hr(8). A BCF of 7.6 was estimated for phenol(SRC), using the log Kow of 1.46(5) and a recommended regression-derived equation(6). According to a recommended classification scheme(9), the estimated and reported BCF values and the rapid elimination of phenol suggests that bioaccumulation of phenol is unlikely(SRC).
[(1) Kobayashi K et al; Bull Jap Soc Sci Fish 45: 173-5 (1979) (2) Dauble DD et al; Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 37: 125-32 (1986) (3) Freitag D et al; p 119 in: QSAR Environ Toxicol Proc Workshop Quant Struct-Act Relat. Kaiser KLE ed Reidel: Netherlands (1984) (4) Hardy JT et al; Environ Toxicol Chem 4: 29-35 (1985) (5) Hansch C, Leo AJ; Medchem Project Issue No 26. Claremont CA: Pomona College (1985) (6) Lyman WJ et al; Handbook of Chem Property Estimation Methods. McGraw-Hill NY p 5-5 (1982) (7) Nendzia M; pp 43-66 in Bioaccumulation Aquat Sys Proc Int Workshop, 1990, Nagel R & Loskill R eds, VCH: Weinheim, Germany (1990) (8) Nagel R, Urich K Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 24: 374-8 (1980) (9) Franke C et al; Chemosphere 29: 1501-14 (1994) (10) Loehr RC, Krishnamoorthy R; Haz Waste Haz Mat 5: 109-19 (1988)]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Soil Adsorption/Mobility:

The pKa of phenol is 9.994(1), indicating that it will be partially dissociated at the upper end of environmental pH range and that its mobility may be pH dependent(SRC). Phenol is reported to have low adsorptivity to clay soils and silt loam(1) and no adsorption to aquifer material(3) and montmorillonite and kaolinite clays(11). The Koc for phenol to a Batcombe silt loam soil (pH 6.7, organic carbon 2.51%) was 30(8). It was 16 for a Brookstone clay loam (pH 5.7, organic matter 5.1%) and varied with pH and iron content of the soil(9). The Freundlich K (1/N) for phenol in Captina (pH 5.7, 1.1 % organic matter) and Palouse silt loam (pH 5.7, 3.6% organic matter) soils were 0.58 (1.15) and 0.81 (1.00)(2); the Koc values for these soils are 91 and 39(SRC). Using its water solubility of 82,800 mg/l(4), an estimated Koc of 8.6 was calculated(SRC) using a recommended regression equation(5). Based on the reported and estimated Koc, phenol will be expected to generally exhibit very high mobility in soil(6), and therefore may leach to the groundwater. In a study of the adsorption of phenol onto siltstone associated with a Wyoming coal deposit suitable for in situ gasification, the pH of the solution was the major controlling factor with adsorption occurring at pH's below the pKa of phenol and no adsorption occurring at pH's above the pKa(7). The log of the Freundlich K value was approximately -4(7). Therefore, phenol may be transported by groundwater near in situ coal gasification sites due to the elevated pH's at these sites after gasification(7).
[(1) Artiola-Fortuny J, Fuller WH; Soil Sci 133: 18-26 (1982) (2) Scott HD et al; J Environ Qual 12: 91-5 (1983) (3) Ehrlich GG et al; Groundwater 20: 703-10 (1982) (4) Southworth GR, Keller JL; Water Air Soil Poll 28: 239-48 (1986) (5) Lyman WJ et al; Handbook of Chem Property Estimation Methods. McGraw-Hill NY Chapt 4 (Eqn 4-5) (1982) (6) Swann RL et al; Res Rev 85: 17-28 (1983) (7) Laquer FC, Manahan SE; Chemosphere 16: 1431-45 (1987) (8) Briggs GG; J Agric Food Chem 29: 1050-9 (1981) (9) Boyd SA et al; Appl Environ Microbiol 46: 50-4 (1983) (10) Serjeant EP, Dempsey B; Ionization Constants of Organic Acids in Aqueous Solution. IUPAC Chemical Data Series, NY,NY: Pergamon Press p. 160 (1979) (11) Luh MD, Baker RA; pp. 534-42 in Proc 25th Ind Waste Conf Purdue Univ (1970)]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Volatilization from Water/Soil:

The Henry's Law constant of phenol is 3.33X10-7 atm-cu m/mole(1). Based on this Henry's Law constant, the volatilization half-life from a model river (1 m deep, flowing 1 m/sec, wind velocity of 3 m/sec) is estimated to be 107 days(2,SRC). The liquid phase transfer coefficient for phenol relative to oxygen was measured to be 0.01 in a laboratory reactor(4). Using the oxygen reaeration rate for a river, 0.04 1/hr(5), the volatilization half-life would be 72 days(SRC). Phenol's vapor pressure, 0.350 mm Hg at 25 deg C(3) and low adsorptivity to soil indicate that volatilization from dry soil and other surfaces may occur(SRC).
[(1) Gaffney JS et al; Environ Sci Technol 21: 519-24 (1987) (2) Lyman WJ et al; Handbook of Chemical Property Estimation Methods. NY: McGraw-Hill Chapt 14, 15 (1982) (3) Jones AH; J Chem Eng Data 5: 196-200 (1960) (4) Ince N, Inel Y; Water Air Soil Pollut 47: 71-9 (1989) (5) Lyman WJ et al; Handbook of Chem Property Estimation Methods. McGraw-Hill NY Chap 15 (1982)]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Environmental Water Concentrations:

DRINKING WATER: Not detected in finished drinking water in USA(1). Detected in US drinking water, 1 ppb, mean(2). Identified in the one sample of tap water analyzed in New Jersey as part of the Total Exposure Assessment Methodology (TEAM) study(4). Great Britain, March-Dec 1976, drinking water derived from groundwater sources, 4 sites, 50% pos; from surface water, 30% pos(3).
[(1) USEPA; Ambient Water Quality Criteria Phenol, page C-3 USEPA 440/5-80-066 (PB 81-17772) (1980) (2) Nicola RM; J Environ Health 49: 342-7 (1987) (3) Fielding M et al; Organic Micropollutants in Drinking Water. TR-159. Eng Water Res Center: Mendmenham (1981) (4) Wallace LA; Toxicol Environ Chem 12: 215-36 (1986)]**PEER REVIEWED**

GROUNDWATER: Maximum of 1130 ppm in 9 wells in Wisconsin after a spill(1). Concn of phenol in 2 aquifers 15 months after completion of coal gasification project 6.5-10,000 ppb(2). Max concn of phenol in Biscayne Aquifer Study Area, site of an industrial landfill in Dade County, FL was 38 ug/L(3). However. no phenol was detected in field wells and finished water treatment plants that utilized water from the aquifer. Phenol was detected in wells in an alluvial aquifer near Zagreb, Yugoslavia at 10-100 ng/L; the wells were near a wastewater canal that received untreated wastes from the pharmaceutical industry that contained phenol levels exceeding 1000 ng/L(3). It was not detected in wells near the Sava River which contained phenol in the 1-10 ng/L range(3).
[(1) Delfino JJ, Dube DJ; J Environ Sci Health A11: 345-55 (1976) (2) Stuermer DH et al; Environ Sci Tech 16: 582-7 (1982) (3) Ahel M; pp 423-7 in Org Micropollut Aquat Environ, Proc Eur Symp, 6th (1991)]**PEER REVIEWED**

SURFACE WATER: Industrial rivers in USA: 0-5 ppb(1,2). Lake Huron 3-24 ppb(3). Detected, not quantified in 2 of 110 raw water supplies in 1977 analyzed in EPA National Organics Monitoring Survey(4). USEPA STORET database, 1,754 data points, 13.0% pos, 5.0 ppb median concn(5). Northern Alberta in region of a pulp mill, fall and summer of 1990 (12 samples), not detected (detection limit 0.02 ug/L)(6). Phenol was present in the Sava River, Yugoslavia near Zagreb at a level of about 1-10 ng/L(8). The level of phenol in the Rio Santiago, Argentina was 40 mg/L(7). This river receives effluents from a large petrochemical and oil refinery complex, a steel rolling mill and shipyards.
[(1) Sheldon LS, Hites RA; Environ Sci Tech 12: 1188-94 (1978) (2) Sheldon LS, Hites RA; Environ Sci Tech 13: 574-9 (1979) (3) Konasewich D et al; Status Report on Organic and Heavy Metal Contaminants in Lakes Erie, Michigan, Huron and Superior Basin. Great Lakes Water Quality Board (1978) (4) USEPA; Ambient Water Quality Criteria Phenol, page C-3 EPA 440/5-80-066 (PB 81-17772) (1980) (5) Staples CA et al; Environ Toxicol Chem 4: 131-42 (1985) (6) Morales A et al; Water Environ Res 64: 669-81 (1992) (7) Ronco AE et al; Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 51: 657-64 (1993) (8) Ahel M; pp 423-7 in Org Micropollut Aquat Environ, Proc Eur Symp, 6th (1991)]**PEER REVIEWED**

RAIN/CLOUD WATER: 7 rain events in Portland, OR, Feb-Apr 1984 >280 parts/trillion, mean in rain. Rain samples collected at two sites in Switzerland were initially 5 and 8 ug/L and rapidly decreased as a function of time as a result of in- and below-cloud scavenging(3). Phenol in 25 rain samples in Hannover, Germany between July, 1989 and Feb 1990 ranged from 1.3-15.4 ug/L with a mean of 5.6 ug/L(2). In cloud and rain water samples collected in the Vosges Mountains, France in 1991, the mean phenol concn was 3.45 ug/L in cloud water (5 samples) and 1.58 ug/L in rain(4).
[(1) Leuenberger C et al; Environ Sci Technol 19: 1053-8 (1985) (2) Levson K et al; Chemosphere 21: 1037-61 (1990) (3) Hart KM et al; Water Air Soil Pollut 68: 91-112 (1993) (4) Levson K et al; Int J Environ Anal Chem 52: 87-97 (1993)]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Effluent Concentrations:

In a comprehensive survey of wastewater from 4000 industrial and publicly owned treatment works (POTWs) sponsored by the Effluent Guidelines Division of the U.S. EPA, phenol was identified in discharges of the following industrial category (positive occurrences, median concn in ppb): timber products (31; 119.8), leather tanning (14; 158.3), iron and steel mfg (14; 179.8), petroleum refining (13; 242.8), nonferrous metals (37; 73.0), paint and ink (14; 95.9), printing and publishing (12; 28.5), coal mining (1; 482.4), organics and plastics (86; 227.5), inorganic chemicals (8; 49.3), textile mills (7; 31.9), plastics and synthetics (26; 85.3), pulp and paper (31; 68.4), rubber processing (12; 156.0), soaps and detergents (4; 179.4), auto and other laundries (4; 33.3), pesticides manufacture (4; 3077.7), photographic industries (5; 403.1), gum and wood industries (9; 9.7), pharmaceuticals (17; 73.6), explosives (14; 27.0), plastics mfg (4; 517.5), foundries (54; 282.6), porcelain/enameling (1; 7.5), aluminum (21; 88.2), electronics (29; 163.4), oil and gas extraction (15; 120.3), organic chemicals (54; 63.2), mechanical products (21; 55.3), transportation equipment (5; 174.4), synfuels (15; 82.6), publicly owned treatment works (151; 77.6), rum industry (5; 72.2)(1). Industries with highest effluent concns >10 ppm were: organics and plastics, 530.4 ppm; photographic industries, 32.8; and pesticides manufacture, 18.8 ppm(1). In a monitoring study of 37 water pollution control plants in Ontario, Canada (275 samples), phenol was detected in 42.9% of samples of raw sewage from 29 plants with a geometric mean and max concn of 14.5 and 276 ppm, respectively(2). The concn on phenol in emissions of a municipal waste incinerator in Germany was 1.40 ug/cu m(3).
[(1) Shackelford WM et al; Analyt Chim Acta 146: 15-27 (supplemental data) (1983) (2) Canviro Consultants; Thirt seven municipal water pollution control plants, pilot monitoring study, Vol 1. Interim report, Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Water Resources Branch, ISBN 0-7729-4900-X (1988) (3) Jay K, Stieglitz L; Chemosphere 30:1249-60 (1995)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Industries with mean phenol concns >0.1 ppm in treated wastewater (max/avg concn, ppm): iron and steel mfg, 53 ppm max/5.7 ppm avg, leather tanning and finishing, 1.4/0.63, aluminum forming, 9.7/1.3, electrical/electronic components, 3.5/<0.74, foundries, 34/2.2, pharmaceuticals, 4.6/0.75, organics/plastics mfg, not reported/0.110, paint and ink formulation, 1.2/0.14, rubber processing, 12/3.0(3). Effluent from a chemical specialties manufacturing plant contained 0.01-0.30 ppm phenol(1) and a 24-hr composite effluent sample from a plant on the Delaware River contained 7 ppm phenol(2). Effluent in the EPA STORET database (2,068 data points), 42.1% pos for phenol, median concn 10.0 ppb(4). US Nationwide Urban Runoff Program (15 cities, 86 samples), frequency of detection, 4% pos (Washington, DC and Bellevue, WA, 3-10 ppb)(5). Groundwater at 178 CERCLA hazardous waste sites, 13.6% pos(6).
[(1) Jungclaus GA et al; Environ Sci Tech 12: 88-96 (1978) (2) Shelton LS, Hites RA; Environ Sci Tech 13: 574-9 (1979) (3) USEPA; Treatability Manual page I.8.1-3 USEPA-600/2-82-001A (1981) (4) Staples CA et al; Environ Toxicol Chem 4: 131-42 (1985) (5) Cole RH et al; J Water Poll Control Fed 56: 898-908 (1984) (6) Plumb RH Jr; Ground Water Monit Rev 7: 94-100 (1987)]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Sediment/Soil Concentrations:

SEDIMENT: EPA STORET database, 318 data points, 9% pos, <1000 ppb median concn (dry weight)(3). Lake Huron, 13 ppm(1). Not detected in unspecified industrial river in USA(2). Sediment collected 6 km northwest of the Los Angeles county wastewater treatment plant discharge zone at Palos Verdes, CA, 10 ppb dry weight(4). Northern Alberta in region of a pulp mill, fall and summer of 1990 (20 samples) not detected-0.5 ppm (detection limit 0.08 ppm)(5). SOIL: No data.
[(1) Konasewich D et al; Status Report on Organic and Heavy Metal Contaminants in Lakes Erie, Michigan, Huron and Superior Basins. Great Lake Water Quality Board (1978) (2) Jungclaus GA et al; Environ Sci Technol 12: 88-96 (1978) (3) Staples CA et al; Environ Toxicol Chem 4: 131-42 (1985) (4) Gossett RW et al; Marine Pollut Bull 14: 387-92 (1983) (5) Morales A et al; Water Environ Res 64: 669-81 (1992)]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Atmospheric Concentrations:

URBAN/SUBURBAN: USA (7 samples), 0.030 ppb, median(1); USA (2 samples), 0.015 ppb(5); USA (2 sites), 0.05-0.35 ug/cu m, <20-289 ug/cu m (with 50% of all observations <30 ug/cu m(3). The concn of phenol was measured with ground level 12-hr high volume samplers in Minneapolis and Salt Lake City between Nov 1988 and Feb 1989 when wood burning would be expected to contribute to atmospheric phenol(7). Hardwood is burned in Minneapolis and softwood in Salt Lake City. The phenol concns at various types of sites were (site description, number of sites, concn in ng/cu m): suburban residential (Minneapolis), 5, 353-1420 (second highest level 577); city res (M), 3, 181-367; non-res downtown (M), 3, 257-395; res suburban (Salt Lake City) 3, 384-520; city res (SLC), 6, 230-765; non-res downtown (SLC), 2, 251-9(97). The gas phase concn of phenol during 7 rain events in Portland, OR, Feb-Apr 1984, 220-410 ng/cu m, avg 320 ng/cu m(6). The mean concn and standard deviation of phenol in 155 cities in the USSR in 1989 was 4 ug/cu m and 3 ug/cu m, respectively(4). In one city, Chelyabinsk, the mean concn was about 8.5 ug/cu m(4). SOURCE DOMINATED AREAS: USA (83 samples) 5 ppb, median, range 0.44-420 ppb(1); USA (44 samples) 6.88 ppb, median(5). Identified, not quantified, in air along the Niagara River, Sept 1982(2).
[(1) Brodzinsky R, Singh HB; Volatile Organic Compounds in the Atmosphere: An Assessment of Available Data. SRI International. EPA Contract 68-02-3452 198 pp (1982) (2) Hoff RM, Chan KW; Environ Sci Technol 21: 556-61 (1987) (3) Scow K et al; Exposure and Risk Assessment for Phenol (Revised) p 76 USEPA/440/4-85/013 (1981) (4) Bezuglava EY et al; Atmos Environ 27A: 773-9 (1993) (5) Shah JJ, Heyerdahl EK; National Ambient VOC Database Update USEPA 600/3-88/010 (1988) (6) Leuenberger C et al; Environ Sci Technol 19: 1053-8 (1985) (7) Hawthorne SB et al; Environ Sci Technol 26: 2251-62 (1992)]**PEER REVIEWED**

INDOOR AIR: In a Finnish study of chemicals present in air of normal and "sick" homes, phenol was qualitatively detected in 56% of the 26 homes screened. A subsequent quantitative study of 50 normal and 38 sick homes, the median phenol concn in the normal homes was 0.70 ug/cu m with 2% of the homes exceeding the median concn by a factor of 5-10(1). The phenol concn in the sick homes did not exceed this median by as much as a factor of 5. In 7 of the sick homes chosen as case studies the phenol concn ranged from 0.34 to 2.66 ug/cu m. PERSONAL AIR: Not identified in 8 samples in New Jersey as part of the Total Exposure Assessment Methodology (TEAM) study(2).
[(1) Kostianen R; Atmos Environ 29: 693-702 (1995) (2) Wallace LA et al; Environ Res 35: 293-319 (1984)]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Food Survey Values:

The concn of phenol in summer smoked sausage and smoked pork belly was 7 ppm and 28.6 ppm, respectively(1). It was identified, not quantified, as a volatile in: Mountain cheese(2), fried bacon(3), fried chicken(4), clams(6), short-necked clams(6) and coffee(5). Phenol may be a component of medicinal preparations such as throat lozenges(1).
[(1) USEPA; Ambient Water Quality Criteria Phenol page C-5 USEPA-440/5-80-066 (PB 81-17772) (1980) (2) Dumont JP, Adda J; J Agric Food Chem 26: 364-7 (1978) (3) Ho CT et al; J Agric Food Chem 31: 336-42 (1983) (4) Tang JT et al; J Agric Food Chem 31: 1287-92 (1983) (5) Aeschbacher HU et al; Food Chem Toxic 27: 227-32 (1989) (6) Kubota K et al; J Agric Food Chem 39: 1127-30 (1991)]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Fish/Seafood Concentrations:

Bottomfish, Commencement Bay, Tacoma, WA, June-Dec 1981, 5 sites, highest avg concn, 0.14 ppm, max concn, 0.22 ppm(1). In a 1983 survey of composite, nearshore whole fish samples collected from 13 Lake Michigan tributaries and Grand Traverse Bay (2 species from each site), phenol was only detected in common carp (0.16 ppm) and channel catfish (0.06 ppm) from Grand River, common carp (0.02 ppm) from Muskegon River, and common carp (0.09 ppm) from Pere Marquette River(2). Northern Alberta in region of a pulp mill, fall and summer of 1990 (22 fish, muscle)- not detected (detection limit 0.03 ppm)(3).
[(1) Nicola RM; J Environ Health 49: 342-7 (1987) (2) Camanzo J et al; J Great Lakes Res 13: 296-309 (1987) (3) Morales A et al; Water Environ Res 64: 669-81 (1992)]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Animal Concentrations:

Natural component of animal matter; rabbit (muscle) 0-1.6 ppm (1).
[(1) USEPA; Ambient Water Quality Criteria Phenol page C-5 to C-6 USEPA 440/6-80-066 (PB 81-17772) (1980)]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Other Environmental Concentrations:

Phenol was tentatively identified during the thermal decomposition of 2 samples of polyvinylidene chloride at 22.6 and 27.8 ug/g of polymer heated(1). Phenol was emitted at 200 deg C. Phenol was present in a sample of fresh poultry manure at 1.86 ppm(2). After the manure sat for 9 and 28 days at 27-28 deg C, the concn of phenol rose to 28.0 and 68.1 ppm, respectively. It is thought that phenol is excreted as glucuronides and the phenol liberated by the action of microbes or enzymes afterwards(2).
[(1) Yashuhara A; Morita M; Environ Sci Technol 22: 646-50 (1988) (2) Yashuhara A; J Chromatogr 387: 371-8 (1987)]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Environmental Standards & Regulations:

 

 

FIFRA Requirements:

Phenol is exempted from the requirement of a tolerance when used as a solvent or cosolvent in accordance with good agricultural practice as inert (or occasionally active) ingredients in pesticide formulations applied to growing crops only.
[40 CFR 180.1001(d) (7/1/94)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Phenol is exempted from the requirement of a tolerance when used as a solvent or cosolvent in accordance with good agricultural practice as inert (or occasionally active) ingredients in pesticide formulations applied to animals.
[40 CFR 180.1001(e) (7/1/94)]**PEER REVIEWED**

As the federal pesticide law FIFRA directs, EPA is conducting a comprehensive review of older pesticides to consider their health and environmental effects and make decisions about their future use. Under this pesticide reregistration program, EPA examines health and safety data for pesticide active ingredients initially registered before November 1, 1984, and determines whether they are eligible for reregistration. In addition, all pesticides must meet the new safety standard of the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996. Pesticides for which EPA had not issued Registration Standards prior to the effective date of FIFRA, as amended in 1988, were divided into three lists based upon their potential for human exposure and other factors, with List B containing pesticides of greater concern and List D pesticides of less concern. Phenol is found on List D. Case No: 4074; Pesticide type: antimicrobial; Case Status: OPP is reviewing data from the pesticide's producers regarding its human health and/or environmental effects, or OPP is determining the pesticide's eligibility for reregistration and developing the Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED) document.; Active ingredient (AI): Phenol; Data Call-in (DCI) Date(s): 09/30/93; AI Status: The producers of the pesticide has made commitments to conduct the studies and pay the fees required for reregistration, and are meeting those commitments in a timely manner.
[USEPA/OPP; Status of Pesticides in Registration, Reregistration and Special Review p.331 (Spring, 1998) EPA 738-R-98-002]**QC REVIEWED**

 

Acceptable Daily Intakes:

Calculated acceptable daily intake= 0.1 mg/kg.
[USEPA; Ambient Water Quality Criteria Document: Phenol p.C-38 (1980) EPA 440-80-066]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

TSCA Requirements:

Pursuant to section 8(d) of TSCA, EPA promulagated a model Health and Safety Data Reporting Rule. The section 8(d) model rule requires manufacturers, importers, and processors of listed chemical substances and mixtures to submit to EPA copies and lists of unpublished health and safety studies. Phenol is included on this list.
[40 CFR 716.120 (7/1/94)]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

CERCLA Reportable Quantities:

Persons in charge of vessels or facilities are required to notify the National Response Center (NRC) immediately, when there is a release of this designated hazardous substance, in an amount equal to or greater than its reportable quantity of 1000 lb or 454 kg. The toll free number of the NRC is (800) 424-8802; In the Washington D.C. metropolitan area (202) 426-2675. The rule for determining when notification is required is stated in 40 CFR 302.4 (section IV. D.3.b).
[40 CFR 302.4 (7/1/94)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Releases of CERCLA hazardous substances are subject to the release reporting requirement of CERCLA section 103, codified at 40 CFR part 302, in addition to the requirements of 40 CFR part 355. Phenol is an extremely hazardous substance (EHS) subject to reporting requirements when stored in amounts in excess of its threshold planning quantity (TPQ) of 500/10,000 lbs.
[40 CFR 355 (7/1/97)]**QC REVIEWED**

 

RCRA Requirements:

U188; As stipulated in 40 CFR 261.33, when phenol, as a commercial chemical product or manufacturing chemical intermediate or an off-specification commercial chemical product or a manufacturing chemical intermediate, becomes a waste, it must be managed according to Federal and/or State hazardous waste regulations. Also defined as a hazardous waste is any residue, contaminated soil, water, or other debris resulting from the cleanup of a spill, into water or on dry land, of this waste. Generators of small quantities of this waste may qualify for partial exclusion from hazardous waste regulations (40 CFR 261.5).
[40 CFR 261.33 (7/1/94)]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Atmospheric Standards:

This action promulgates standards of performance for equipment leaks of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) in the Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry (SOCMI). The intended effect of these standards is to require all newly constructed, modified, and reconstructed SOCMI process units to use the best demonstrated system of continuous emission reduction for equipment leaks of VOC, considering costs, non air quality health and environmental impact and energy requirements. Phenol is produced, as an intermediate or final product, by process units covered under this subpart.
[40 CFR 60.489 (7/1/94)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Listed as a hazardous air pollutant (HAP) generally known or suspected to cause serious health problems. The Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990, directs EPA to set standards requiring major sources to sharply reduce routine emissions of toxic pollutants. EPA is required to establish and phase in specific performance based standards for all air emission sources that emit one or more of the listed pollutants. Phenol is included on this list.
[Clean Air Act as amended in 1990, Sect. 112 (b) (1) Public Law 101-549 Nov. 15, 1990]**QC REVIEWED**

 

Clean Water Act Requirements:

Criterion (permissible level) for ambient water= 0.3 mg phenol/l.
[USEPA; Ambient Water Quality Criteria Document: Phenol p.C-38 (1980) EPA 440-80-066] **QC REVIEWED**

The criterion (permissible level) for protection of freshwater aquatic life is 600 ug/l (24 hr avg) and a ceiling of 3,400 ug/l.
[USEPA; Ambient Water Quality Criteria Doc: Phenol p.C-38 (1980) EPA 440-80-066] **QC REVIEWED**

Toxic pollutant designated pursuant to section 307(a)(1) of the Clean Water Act and is subject to effluent limitations.
[40 CFR 401.15 (7/1/87)] **QC REVIEWED**

Designated as a hazardous substance under section 311(b)(2)(A) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act and further regulated by the Clean Water Act Amendments of 1977 and 1978. These regulations apply to discharges of this substance.
[40 CFR 116.4 (7/1/87)] **QC REVIEWED**

 

Federal Drinking Water Guidelines:

EPA 4000 ug/l
[USEPA/Office of Water; Federal-State Toxicology and Risk Analysis Committee (FSTRAC). Summary of State and Federal Drinking Water Standards and Guidelines (11/93)] **QC REVIEWED**

 

State Drinking Water Guidelines:

(CA) CALIFORNIA 5 ug/l
[USEPA/Office of Water; Federal-State Toxicology and Risk Analysis Committee (FSTRAC). Summary of State and Federal Drinking Water Standards and Guidelines (11/93)] **QC REVIEWED**

(FL) FLORIDA 10 ug/l
[USEPA/Office of Water; Federal-State Toxicology and Risk Analysis Committee (FSTRAC). Summary of State and Federal Drinking Water Standards and Guidelines (11/93)] **QC REVIEWED**

(MN) MINNESOTA 4000 ug/l
[USEPA/Office of Water; Federal-State Toxicology and Risk Analysis Committee (FSTRAC). Summary of State and Federal Drinking Water Standards and Guidelines (11/93)] **QC REVIEWED**

(NH) NEW HAMPSHIRE 4200 ug/l
[USEPA/Office of Water; Federal-State Toxicology and Risk Analysis Committee (FSTRAC). Summary of State and Federal Drinking Water Standards and Guidelines (11/93)] **QC REVIEWED**

(WI) WISCONSIN 6000 ug/l
[USEPA/Office of Water; Federal-State Toxicology and Risk Analysis Committee (FSTRAC). Summary of State and Federal Drinking Water Standards and Guidelines (11/93)] **QC REVIEWED**

 

FDA Requirements:

Phenol is an indirect food additive for use as a preservative onlyas a component of adhesives.
[21 CFR 175.105 (4/1/93)]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Allowable Tolerances:

Phenol is exempted from the requirement of a tolerance when used as a solvent or cosolvent in accordance with good agricultural practice as inert (or occasionally active) ingredients in pesticide formulations applied to growing crops only.
[40 CFR 180.1001(d) (7/1/94)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Phenol is exempted from the requirement of a tolerance when used as a solvent or cosolvent in accordance with good agricultural practice as inert (or occasionally active) ingredients in pesticide formulations applied to animals.
[40 CFR 180.1001(e) (7/1/94)]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Chemical/Physical Properties:

 

 

Molecular Formula:

C6-H6-O
**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Molecular Weight:

94.11
[Lide, D.R. (ed.). CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 75th ed. Boca Raton, Fl: CRC Press Inc., 1994-1995.,p. 3-252]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Color/Form:

COLORLESS, ACICULAR CRYSTALS OR WHITE, CRYSTALLINE MASS
[Budavari, S. (ed.). The Merck Index - Encyclopedia of Chemicals, Drugs and Biologicals. Rahway, NJ: Merck and Co., Inc., 1989. 1150]**PEER REVIEWED**

Colorless to light pink, interlaced, or separate, needleshaped crystals, or a ... light pink, crystalline mass
[Osol, A. (ed.). Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences. 16th ed. Easton, Pennsylvania: Mack Publishing Co., 1980. 1262]**PEER REVIEWED**

Colorless to light pink crystalline solid. [Note: Phenol liquefies by mixing with about 8% water.]
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 94-116. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, June 1994. 248]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Odor:

HAS DISTINCT, AROMATIC, SOMEWHAT SICKENING SWEET & ACRID ODOR
[Clayton, G. D. and F. E. Clayton (eds.). Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology: Volume 2A, 2B, 2C: Toxicology. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley Sons, 1981-1982. 2576]**PEER REVIEWED**

WHEN PERFECTLY PURE, PHENOL IS DEVOID OF ODOR OF CRESOL, BUT IT HAS PECULIAR AROMATIC ODOR WHICH IS NOT DISAGREEABLE
[Osol, A. and J.E. Hoover, et al. (eds.). Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences. 15th ed. Easton, Pennsylvania: Mack Publishing Co., 1975. 1264]**PEER REVIEWED**

Sweet, tarry odor
[U.S. Coast Guard, Department of Transportation. CHRIS - Hazardous Chemical Data. Volume II. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1984-5.]**PEER REVIEWED**

Sweet acrid odor.
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 94-116. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, June 1994. 248]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Taste:

HAS SHARP BURNING TASTE; WHEN IN VERY WEAK SOLN IT HAS A SWEETISH TASTE
[Sax, N.I. and R.J. Lewis, Sr. (eds.). Hawley's Condensed Chemical Dictionary. 11th ed. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1987. 896]**PEER REVIEWED**

Taste threshold: lower-0.0001 ppm, median-0.15 ppm.
[Environment Canada; Tech Info for Problem Spills: Phenol (Draft) p.71 (1981)]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Boiling Point:

181.8 deg C @ 760 mm Hg
[Lide, D.R. (ed.). CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 75th ed. Boca Raton, Fl: CRC Press Inc., 1994-1995.,p. 3-252]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Melting Point:

40.9 deg C
[Lide, D.R. (ed.). CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 75th ed. Boca Raton, Fl: CRC Press Inc., 1994-1995.,p. 3-252]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Critical Temperature & Pressure:

Critical Temp = 694.2 K; Critical Pressure = 6.13 MPa
[Lide, D.R. (ed.). CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 75th ed. Boca Raton, Fl: CRC Press Inc., 1994-1995.,p. 6-60]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Density/Specific Gravity:

1.0545 @ 45 deg C/4 deg C
[Lide, D.R. (ed.). CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 75th ed. Boca Raton, Fl: CRC Press Inc., 1994-1995.,p. 3-252]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Dissociation Constants:

pKa = 9.994 @ 25 deg C
[Serjeant EP, Dempsey B; Ionisation Constants of Organic Acids in Aqueous Solution. IUPAC Chem Ser, NY,NY: Pergamon Press p. 160 (179)]**PEER REVIEWED**

pKa = 9.89 @ 20 deg C
[Lide, D.R. (ed.). CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 75th ed. Boca Raton, Fl: CRC Press Inc., 1994-1995.,p. 8-49]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Heat of Combustion:

-3053.5 kJ/mol @ 25 deg C (crystal); -3122.2 kJ/mol @ 25 deg C (gas)
[Lide, D.R. (ed.). CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 75th ed. Boca Raton, Fl: CRC Press Inc., 1994-1995.,p. 5-80]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Heat of Vaporization:

57.82 kJ/mol @ 25 deg C
[Lide, D.R. (ed.). CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 75th ed. Boca Raton, Fl: CRC Press Inc., 1994-1995.,p. 6-118]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Octanol/Water Partition Coefficient:

Log Kow = 1.46
[Hansch, C., Leo, A., D. Hoekman. Exploring QSAR - Hydrophobic, Electronic, and Steric Constants. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society., 1995. 20]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

pH:

about 6.0 (aq soln)
[Budavari, S. (ed.). The Merck Index - Encyclopedia of Chemicals, Drugs and Biologicals. Rahway, NJ: Merck and Co., Inc., 1989. 1150]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Solubilities:

1 G/15 ML WATER
[Budavari, S. (ed.). The Merck Index - Encyclopedia of Chemicals, Drugs and Biologicals. Rahway, NJ: Merck and Co., Inc., 1989. 1150]**PEER REVIEWED**

1 g/12 ml benzene
[Budavari, S. (ed.). The Merck Index - Encyclopedia of Chemicals, Drugs and Biologicals. Rahway, NJ: Merck and Co., Inc., 1989. 1150]**PEER REVIEWED**

Very sol in alcohol, chloroform, ether, glycerol, petrolatum, carbon disulfide, volatile and fixed oils, aq alkali hydroxides. Almost insoluble in petr ether.
[Budavari, S. (ed.). The Merck Index - Encyclopedia of Chemicals, Drugs and Biologicals. Rahway, NJ: Merck and Co., Inc., 1989. 1150]**PEER REVIEWED**

MISCIBLE IN ACETONE
[Lide, D.R. (ed.). CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 75th ed. Boca Raton, Fl: CRC Press Inc., 1994-1995.,p. 3-252]**PEER REVIEWED**

93,000 MG IN 1 L WATER AT DEG 25 C.
[MORRISON RT, BOYD RN; ORG CHEM, 3RD ED, 1258, 1973]**PEER REVIEWED**

Sparingly sol in mineral oil
[Osol, A. (ed.). Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences. 16th ed. Easton, Pennsylvania: Mack Publishing Co., 1980. 1263]**PEER REVIEWED**

Very sol in carbon tetrachloride, methyl alcohol, acetic acid, liquid sulfur dioxide
[Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology. 3rd ed., Volumes 1-26. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, 1978-1984.,p. V17 373 (1979)]**PEER REVIEWED**

82,800 mg/L @ 25 deg C in water
[Southworth GR, Keller JL; Water Air Soil Poll 28: 239-48 (1986)]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Spectral Properties:

INDEX OF REFRACTION: 1.5408 @ 41 DEG C/D
[Lide, D.R. (ed.). CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 75th ed. Boca Raton, Fl: CRC Press Inc., 1994-1995.,p. 3-252]**PEER REVIEWED**

MAX ABSORPTION (ALC): 276 NM SHOULDER (LOG E= 3.16), 218.5 NM (LOG E= 3.78), 266 NM SHOULDER (LOG E= 3.18), 271 NM (LOG E= 3.28)
[Weast, R.C. (ed.). Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 60th ed. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press Inc., 1979.,p. C-427]**PEER REVIEWED**

IR: 4815 (Coblentz Society Spectral Collection)
[Weast, R.C. and M.J. Astle. CRC Handbook of Data on Organic Compounds. Volumes I and II. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press Inc. 1985.,p. V2 51]**PEER REVIEWED**

UV: 258 (Sadtler Research Laboratories Spectral Collection)
[Weast, R.C. and M.J. Astle. CRC Handbook of Data on Organic Compounds. Volumes I and II. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press Inc. 1985.,p. V2 51]**PEER REVIEWED**

NMR: 3152 (Sadtler Research Laboratories Spectral Collection)
[Weast, R.C. and M.J. Astle. CRC Handbook of Data on Organic Compounds. Volumes I and II. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press Inc. 1985.,p. V2 51]**PEER REVIEWED**

MASS: 199 (Atlas of Mass Spectral Data, John Wiley & Sons, New York)
[Weast, R.C. and M.J. Astle. CRC Handbook of Data on Organic Compounds. Volumes I and II. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press Inc. 1985.,p. V2 51]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Surface Tension:

38.20 mN/m @ 50 deg C; 35.53 mN/m @ 75 deg C; 32.86 mN/m @ 100 deg C
[Lide, D.R. (ed.). CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 75th ed. Boca Raton, Fl: CRC Press Inc., 1994-1995.,p. 6-153]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Vapor Density:

3.24 (AIR= 1)
[Clayton, G. D. and F. E. Clayton (eds.). Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology: Volume 2A, 2B, 2C: Toxicology. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley Sons, 1981-1982. 2568]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Vapor Pressure:

0.3513 mm Hg @ 25 deg C
[Sunshine, I. (ed.). CRC Handbook of Analytical Toxicology. Cleveland: The Chemical Rubber Co., 1969. 650]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Viscosity:

3.437 centapoise @ 50 deg C; 1.784 centapoise @ 75 deg C; 1.099 centapoise @ 100 deg C
[Lide, D.R. (ed.). CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 75th ed. Boca Raton, Fl: CRC Press Inc., 1994-1995.,p. 6-243]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Other Chemical/Physical Properties:

IT IS LIQUEFIED BY MIXING WITH ABOUT 8% WATER
[Budavari, S. (ed.). The Merck Index - Encyclopedia of Chemicals, Drugs and Biologicals. Rahway, NJ: Merck and Co., Inc., 1989. 1150]**PEER REVIEWED**

ABSORBS WATER FROM AIR & LIQUEFIES
[Lewis, R.J., Sr (Ed.). Hawley's Condensed Chemical Dictionary. 12th ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Rheinhold Co., 1993 894]**PEER REVIEWED**

Heat of fusion: 11.29 kJ/mol @ 40.9 deg C
[Lide, D.R. (ed.). CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 75th ed. Boca Raton, Fl: CRC Press Inc., 1994-1995.,p. 6-130]**PEER REVIEWED**

Latent heat of sublimation: 68.7 kJ/mole (25 deg C).
[Dean JA; Lange's Handbook of Chem (1979) as cited in Environment Canada; Tech Info for Problem Spills: Phenol (Draft) p.4 (1981)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Heat of formation: -165.0 kJ/mole (25 deg C).
[Pedley JB, Rylance J; Sussex-NPL Comptuter Anal Thermochem Data (1977) as cited in Environment Canada; Tech Info for Problem Spills: Phenol (Draft) p.4 (1981)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Ionization potential: 8.47 eV.
[Maier JP, Turner DW; J Chem Soc For Trans II 69: 521 (1973) as cited in Environment Canada; Tech Info for Problem Spills: Phenol (Draft) p.4 (1981)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Heat of solution: -10.9 kJ/mole (20 C).
[Perry RH, Chilton CH; Chem Engineer's Handbook (1973) as cited in Environment Canada; Tech Info for Problem Spills: Phenol (Draft) p.4 (1981)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Heat capacity at constant pressure: 127 J/mole K @ 25 deg C
[Lide, D.R. (ed.). CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 75th ed. Boca Raton, Fl: CRC Press Inc., 1994-1995.,p. 5-36]**PEER REVIEWED**

Coefficient of thermal expansion: 1.090 x 10-3/deg C (20 deg C).
[Deane JA; Lange's Handbook of Chem (1979) as cited in Environment Canada; Tech Info for Problem Spills: Phenol (Draft) p.5 (1981)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Saturation concentration: 0.77 g/cu m @ 20 deg C, 2.0 g/cu m @ 30 deg C /in air/.
[Verschueren, K. Handbook of Environmental Data of Organic Chemicals. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1983. 973]**PEER REVIEWED**

% IN SATURATED AIR: 0.046% BY VOL @ 25 DEG C; DENSITY OF SATURATED AIR: 1.00104 (AIR= 1); 1 MG/L= APPROX 260 PPM, 1 PPM= APPROX 0.00384 MG/L @ 25 DEG C & 760 MM HG
[Clayton, G. D. and F. E. Clayton (eds.). Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology: Volume 2A, 2B, 2C: Toxicology. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley Sons, 1981-1982. 2568]**PEER REVIEWED**

When free from water & cresols it congeals at 41 deg C & melts at 43 deg C
[Budavari, S. (ed.). The Merck Index - Encyclopedia of Chemicals, Drugs and Biologicals. Rahway, NJ: Merck and Co., Inc., 1989. 1150]**PEER REVIEWED**

Phenol coagulates collodion; liquefies or becomes semiliquid when triturated with acetanilide, butylchloral hydrate, camphor, monobromated camphor, chloral hydrate, diuretin, lead acetate, menthol, naphthalene, naphthol, acetophentidin, pyrogallol, resorcinol, salol, sodium phosphate, thymol, urethane, chloralamide, terpin hydrate.
[Budavari, S. (ed.). The Merck Index - Encyclopedia of Chemicals, Drugs and Biologicals. Rahway, NJ: Merck and Co., Inc., 1989. 1150]**PEER REVIEWED**

Prone to redden on exposure to air and light, hastened on presence of alkalinity.
[Budavari, S. (ed.). The Merck Index - Encyclopedia of Chemicals, Drugs and Biologicals. Rahway, NJ: Merck and Co., Inc., 1989. 1150]**PEER REVIEWED**

Dielectric constant = 12.40 @ 30 deg C
[Lide, D.R. (ed.). CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 75th ed. Boca Raton, Fl: CRC Press Inc., 1994-1995.,p. 6-166]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Chemical Safety & Handling:

 

 

Hazards Summary:

Phenol is an acutely hazardous substance due primarily to its toxicity. Because phenol is highly corrosive to skin and systemically toxic by all routes of exposure, including dermal absorption, it should not be allowed to contact skin in its normally crystalline or concentrated liquid form. When heated, phenol can give off vapors which are not only toxic, but flammable as well, if exposed to an ignition source. Compliance with the OSHA TLV of 5 ppm should protect against the build-up of both toxic and explosive concentrations of phenol in air. Under all circumstances where skin contact with phenol is possible, protective clothing, including gloves and a face shield, should be worn. This clothing should be made of material which is impervious to phenol eg neoprene, polyethylene, or rubber. Under conditions where airborne concentrations of phenol exceed 20 mg/cu meter, a full-face respiratory device is also required. Warning of potential phenol exposure can come from its sickeningly sweet, acrid odor, detectable at 0.047 ppm. Containers of phenol may be leaking if a check of the contents reveals phenol is turning reddish in color. Toxicity is the prime consideration in the safe storage and shipment of phenol. Designated as "Poison B" by the DOT, phenol containers are labeled "Poison". However, no special containers are required due to phenol's modest fire hazard and low reactivity. Should a phenol fire occur, it may be combatted with water spray, CO2, dry chemical or foam extinguishants. Aside from assuring that all containers and shipment vessels are securely closed, the toxicity and fire hazards of phenol can be greatly reduced by the prevention of overheating in storage areas. This is accomplished with proper ventilation. Spills of phenol should be flushed with water, and caustic soda solution added for neutralization. Phenol should not be allowed to come into contact with strong oxidizing agents, eg peroxodisulfuric acid.
**PEER REVIEWED**

 

DOT Emergency Guidelines:

Health: TOXIC; inhalation, ingestion, or skin contact with material may cause severe injury or death. Contact with molten substance may cause severe burns to skin and eyes. Avoid any skin contact. Effects of contact or inhalation may be delayed. Fire may produce irritating, corrosive and/or toxic gases. Runoff from fire control or dilution water may be corrosive and/or toxic and cause pollution. /Phenol, liquid; Phenol, molten; Phenol, solid; Phenol solution/
[U.S. Department of Transportation. 1996 North American Emergency Response Guidebook. A Guidebook for First Responders During the Initial Phase of aHazardous Materials/Dangerous Goods Incident. U.S. Department of Transportation (U.S. DOT) Research and Special Programs Administration, Office of HazardousMaterials Initiatives and Training (DHM-50), Washington, D.C. (1996).,p. G-153]**QC REVIEWED**

Fire or explosion: Combustible material: may burn but does not ignite readily. When heated, vapors may form explosive mixtures with air: indoors, outdoors, and sewers explosion hazards. Some may polymerize (P) explosively when heated or involved in a fire. Contact with metals may evolve flammable hydrogen gas. Containers may explode when heated. Runoff may pollute waterways. Substance may be transported in a molten form. /Phenol, liquid; Phenol, molten; Phenol, solid; Phenol solution/
[U.S. Department of Transportation. 1996 North American Emergency Response Guidebook. A Guidebook for First Responders During the Initial Phase of aHazardous Materials/Dangerous Goods Incident. U.S. Department of Transportation (U.S. DOT) Research and Special Programs Administration, Office of HazardousMaterials Initiatives and Training (DHM-50), Washington, D.C. (1996).,p. G-153]**QC REVIEWED**

Public safety: CALL Emergency Response Telephone Number on Shipping Paper first. If Shipping Paper not available or no answer, refer to appropriate telephone number listed on the inside back cover. Isolate spill or leak area immediately for at least 25 to 50 meters (80 to 160 feet) in all directions. Keep unauthorized personnel away. Stay upwind. Keep out of low areas. Ventilate enclosed areas. /Phenol, liquid; Phenol, molten; Phenol, solid; Phenol solution/
[U.S. Department of Transportation. 1996 North American Emergency Response Guidebook. A Guidebook for First Responders During the Initial Phase of aHazardous Materials/Dangerous Goods Incident. U.S. Department of Transportation (U.S. DOT) Research and Special Programs Administration, Office of HazardousMaterials Initiatives and Training (DHM-50), Washington, D.C. (1996).,p. G-153]**QC REVIEWED**

Protective clothing: Wear positive pressure self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA). Wear chemical protective clothing which is specifically recommended by the manufacturer. Structural firefighters' protective clothing is recommended for fire situations ONLY; it is not effective in spill situations. /Phenol, liquid; Phenol, molten; Phenol, solid; Phenol solution/
[U.S. Department of Transportation. 1996 North American Emergency Response Guidebook. A Guidebook for First Responders During the Initial Phase of aHazardous Materials/Dangerous Goods Incident. U.S. Department of Transportation (U.S. DOT) Research and Special Programs Administration, Office of HazardousMaterials Initiatives and Training (DHM-50), Washington, D.C. (1996).,p. G-153]**QC REVIEWED**

Evacuation: Spill: See the Table of Initial Isolation and Protective Action Distances for highlighted substances. For non-highlighted substances, increase, in the downwind direction, as necessary, the isolation distance shown under "PUBLIC SAFETY". Fire: If tank, rail car or tank truck is involved in a fire, ISOLATE for 800 meters (1/2 mile) in all directions; also, consider initial evacuation for 800 meters (1/2 mile) in all directions. /Phenol, liquid; Phenol, molten; Phenol, solid; Phenol solution/
[U.S. Department of Transportation. 1996 North American Emergency Response Guidebook. A Guidebook for First Responders During the Initial Phase of aHazardous Materials/Dangerous Goods Incident. U.S. Department of Transportation (U.S. DOT) Research and Special Programs Administration, Office of HazardousMaterials Initiatives and Training (DHM-50), Washington, D.C. (1996).,p. G-153]**QC REVIEWED**

Fire: Small fires: Dry chemical, CO2 or water spray. Large fires: Dry chemical, CO2, alcohol-resistant foam or water spray. Move containers from fire area if you can do it without risk. Dike fire control water for later disposal; do not scatter the material. Fire involving tanks or car/trailer loads: Fight fire from maximum distance or use unmanned hose holders or monitor nozzles. Do not get water inside containers. Cool containers with flooding quantities of water until well after fire is out. Withdraw immediately in case of rising sound from venting safety devices or discoloration of tank. ALWAYS stay away from the ends of tanks. /Phenol, liquid; Phenol, molten; Phenol, solid; Phenol solution/
[U.S. Department of Transportation. 1996 North American Emergency Response Guidebook. A Guidebook for First Responders During the Initial Phase of aHazardous Materials/Dangerous Goods Incident. U.S. Department of Transportation (U.S. DOT) Research and Special Programs Administration, Office of HazardousMaterials Initiatives and Training (DHM-50), Washington, D.C. (1996).,p. G-153]**QC REVIEWED**

Spill or leak: Eliminate all ignition sources (no smoking, flares, sparks or flames in immediate area). Do not touch damaged containers or spilled material unless wearing appropriate protective clothing. Stop leak if you can do it without risk. Prevent entry into waterways, sewers, basements or confined areas. Absorb or cover with dry earth, sand or other non-combustible material and transfer to containers. DO NOT GET WATER INSIDE CONTAINER. /Phenol, liquid; Phenol, molten; Phenol, solid; Phenol solution/
[U.S. Department of Transportation. 1996 North American Emergency Response Guidebook. A Guidebook for First Responders During the Initial Phase of aHazardous Materials/Dangerous Goods Incident. U.S. Department of Transportation (U.S. DOT) Research and Special Programs Administration, Office of HazardousMaterials Initiatives and Training (DHM-50), Washington, D.C. (1996).,p. G-153]**QC REVIEWED**

First aid: Move victim to fresh air. Call emergency medical care. Apply artificial respiration if victim is not breathing. Do not use mouth-to-mouth method if victim ingested or inhaled the substance; induce artificial respiration with the aid of a pocket mask equipped with a one-way valve or other proper respiratory medical device. Administer oxygen if breathing is difficult. Remove and isolate contaminated clothing and shoes. In case of contact with substance, immediately flush skin or eyes with running water for at least 20 minutes. For minor skin contact, avoid spreading material on unaffected skin. Keep victim warm and quiet. Effects of exposure (inhalation, ingestion or skin contact) to substance may be delayed. Ensure that medical personnel are aware of the material(s) involved, and take precautions to protect themselves. /Phenol, liquid; Phenol, molten; Phenol, solid; Phenol solution/
[U.S. Department of Transportation. 1996 North American Emergency Response Guidebook. A Guidebook for First Responders During the Initial Phase of aHazardous Materials/Dangerous Goods Incident. U.S. Department of Transportation (U.S. DOT) Research and Special Programs Administration, Office of HazardousMaterials Initiatives and Training (DHM-50), Washington, D.C. (1996).,p. G-153]**QC REVIEWED**

 

Odor Threshold:

The phenol odor threshold of 19 people was measured and the lowest range of concentrations detected was 0.022-0.094 mg/cu m (0.006-0.024 ppm).
[NIOSH; Criteria Document: Phenol p.138 (1976) DHEW Pub NIOSH 76-196]**PEER REVIEWED**

Threshold odor concentration: 0.047-0.5 ppm; Absolute odor threshold: 0.048 ppm; Recognition threshold: median 0.65 ppm, upper-16.4 ppm; Population identification threshold: 0.01-0.47 ppm.
[Environment Canada; Tech Info for Problem Spills: Phenol (Draft) p.71 (1981)]**PEER REVIEWED**

In water odor detection threshold: 5.90 ppm /chemically pure/; In air odor recognition threshold: 4.70x10-2 ppm; /chemically pure/; In air odor detection threshold: 1.00 ppm /purity not specified/; In air odor recognition threshold 4.70x10-2 ppm /pure/; In air odor threshold (type not specified): 7.70x10+10 molecules/cu cm /purity not specified/; In air odor threshold (type not specified): 2.60x10+11 molecules/cu cm /purity not specified/; In water taste threshold (type not specified): 6.00x10+1 ppm /purity not specified/; Odor threshold (medium & type of threshold not specified): 1.05x10+2 ppm /purity not specified/; Taste detection threshold in synthetic deodorized butter: 1.00x10-2 ppm /chemically pure/; Taste detection threshold (medium not specified): 1.00x10-2 ppm /purity not specified/; In beer taste recognition threshold: 2.71x10+1 moles/l /chemically pure/; In beer taste detection threshold: 1.25x10+1 ppb /chemically pure/; In water taste detection threshold: 2.50x10+1 ppm /purity not specified/; Taste recognition threshold (medium not specified): 1.00x10-2 ppm /purity not specified/
[Fazzalari, F.A. (ed.). Compilation of Odor and Taste Threshold Values Data. ASTM Data Series DS 48A (Committee E-18). Philadelphia, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials, 1978. 133]**PEER REVIEWED**

Odor Low= 0.1786 mg/m; Odor High= 22.42 mg/m
[Ruth JH; Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 47: A-142-51 (1986)]**PEER REVIEWED**

7.9 ppm in water; 0.05 ppm in air
[Sullivan, J.B. Jr., G.R. Krieger (eds.). Hazardous Materials Toxicology-Clinical Principles of Environmental Health. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins, 1992. 1094]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Skin, Eye and Respiratory Irritations:

Strong irritant to tissue.
[Sax, N.I. and R.J. Lewis, Sr. (eds.). Hawley's Condensed Chemical Dictionary. 11th ed. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1987. 897]**PEER REVIEWED**

Vapor irritates respiratory system and eyes.
[Armour, M.A. Hazardous Laboratory Chemicals Disposal Guide. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press Inc., 1991. 288]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Fire Potential:

May be ignited by electrostatic discharge.
[Environment Canada; Tech Info for Problem Spills: Phenol (Draft) p.4 (1981)]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

NFPA Hazard Classification:

Health: 4. 4= Materials that, on very short exposure, could cause death or major residual injury, including those that are too dangerous to be approached without specialized protective equipment. A few whiffs of the vapor or gas can cause death, or contact with the vapor or liquid may be fatal, if it penetrates the fire fighter's normal protective gear. The normal full protective clothing and breathing apparatus available to the typical fire fighter will not provide adequate protection against inhalation or skin contact with these materials.
[Fire Protection Guide to Hazardous Materials. 12 ed. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association, 1997.,p. 325-78]**QC REVIEWED**

Flammability: 2. 2= This degree includes materials that must be moderately heated before ignition will occur and includes Class II and IIIA combustible liquids and solids and semi-solids that readily give off ignitible vapors. Water spray may be used to extinguish fires in these materials because the materials can be cooled below their flash points.
[Fire Protection Guide to Hazardous Materials. 12 ed. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association, 1997.,p. 325-78]**QC REVIEWED**

Reactivity: 0. 0= This degree includes materials that are normally stable, even under fire exposure conditions, and that do not react with water. Normal fire fighting procedures may be used.
[Fire Protection Guide to Hazardous Materials. 12 ed. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association, 1997.,p. 325-78]**QC REVIEWED**

 

Flammable Limits:

1.7%-8.6% IN AIR
[U.S. Coast Guard, Department of Transportation. CHRIS - Hazardous Chemical Data. Volume II. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1984-5.]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Flash Point:

175 deg F; 79 deg C, (Closed cup)
[Fire Protection Guide to Hazardous Materials. 12 ed. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association, 1997.,p. 325-78]**QC REVIEWED**

85 deg C, (Open cup)
[ITII. Toxic and Hazardous Industrial Chemicals Safety Manual. Tokyo, Japan: The International Technical Information Institute, 1988. 405]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Autoignition Temperature:

1319 deg F (715 deg C)
[Fire Protection Guide to Hazardous Materials. 12 ed. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association, 1997.,p. 325-78]**QC REVIEWED**

 

Fire Fighting Procedures:

Fire extinguishing agents: small fires-dry chemical, CO2, water spray or foam (alcohol); large fires- water spray, fog, or foam; use water spray to cool containers in fire area.
[Environment Canada; Tech Info for Problem Spills: Phenol (Draft) p.86 (1981)]**PEER REVIEWED**

If material on fire or involved in fire: Use water in flooding quantities as fog. Solid streams of water may be ineffective. Cool all affected containers with flooding quantities of water. Apply water from as far a distance as possible. Use foam, dry chemical, or carbon dioxide. Keep run off-water out of sewers and water sources. /Phenol, solid/
[Association of American Railroads. Emergency Handling of Hazardous Materials in Surface Transportation. Washington, DC: Association of American Railroads, Bureau of Explosives, 1994. 853]**PEER REVIEWED**

If material on fire or involved in fire: Do not extinguish fire unless flow can be stopped. Extinguish fire using agent suitable for type of surrounding fire. (Material itself does not burn or burns with difficulty.) Use water as flooding quantities as fog. Cool all affected containers with flooding quantities of water. Apply water from as far a distance as possible. Use foam, dry chemical, or carbon dioxide. Keep run-off water out of sewers and water sources. /Phenol, molten/
[Association of American Railroads. Emergency Handling of Hazardous Materials in Surface Transportation. Washington, DC: Association of American Railroads, Bureau of Explosives, 1994. 852]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Toxic Combustion Products:

Toxic and irritating vapors are generated when heated.
[U.S. Coast Guard, Department of Transportation. CHRIS - Hazardous Chemical Data. Volume II. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1984-5.]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Explosive Limits & Potential:

MIXTURES OF AIR CONTAINING 3-10% PHENOL ARE EXPLOSIVE.
[Clayton, G. D. and F. E. Clayton (eds.). Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology: Volume 2A, 2B, 2C: Toxicology. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley Sons, 1981-1982. 2576]**PEER REVIEWED**

When heated, phenol evolves flammable vapors which will form explosive mixtures with air.
[ITII. Toxic and Hazardous Industrial Chemicals Safety Manual. Tokyo, Japan: The International Technical Information Institute, 1988. 405]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Hazardous Reactivities & Incompatibilities:

Addition of aluminum chloride to a large volume of recovered nitrobenzene containing 5% phenol caused a violent explosion. Experiment showed that mixtures containing all three components reacted violently at 120 deg C.
[Bretherick, L. Handbook of Reactive Chemical Hazards. 4th ed. Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd., 1990 38]**PEER REVIEWED**

Uncontrolled contact of phenol with peroxodisulfuric acid may cause explosion.
[Bretherick, L. Handbook of Reactive Chemical Hazards. 4th ed. Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd., 1990 1223]**PEER REVIEWED**

/A combination of phenol with calcium hypochlorite/ ... is an exothermic reaction producing toxic fumes which may ignite.
[Fire Protection Guide to Hazardous Materials. 12 ed. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association, 1997.,p. 491-42]**QC REVIEWED**

Mixtures of peroxymonosulfuric acid with phenol explode.
[Bretherick, L. Handbook of Reactive Chemical Hazards. 4th ed. Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd., 1990 1222]**PEER REVIEWED**

A mixture /of phenol with sodium nitrite/ exploded violently on heating in a test tube.
[Bretherick, L. Handbook of Reactive Chemical Hazards. 4th ed. Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd., 1990 1336]**PEER REVIEWED**

The combination of phenol with acetaldehyde results in violent condensation. /From table/
[ITII. Toxic and Hazardous Industrial Chemicals Safety Manual. Tokyo, Japan: The International Technical Information Institute, 1988. 681]**PEER REVIEWED**

The combination of phenol with 1,3-butadiene and boron trifluoride diethyl ether complex results in an intense exothermic reaction. /From table/
[ITII. Toxic and Hazardous Industrial Chemicals Safety Manual. Tokyo, Japan: The International Technical Information Institute, 1988. 681]**PEER REVIEWED**

The combination of phenol with mineral oxidizing acids results in fire. /From table/
[Ecology and Environment Inc. Toxic Substance Storage Tank Containment. Park Ridge, NJ: Noyes Publications, 1985. 233]**PEER REVIEWED**

The combination of phenol with isocyanates results in heat generation and violent polymerization. /From table/
[Ecology and Environment Inc. Toxic Substance Storage Tank Containment. Park Ridge, NJ: Noyes Publications, 1985. 233]**PEER REVIEWED**

The combination of phenol with nitrides results in heat and flammable gas generation. /From table/
[Ecology and Environment Inc. Toxic Substance Storage Tank Containment. Park Ridge, NJ: Noyes Publications, 1985. 233]**PEER REVIEWED**

Strong oxidizers, calcium hypochlorite, aluminum chloride, acids.
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997. 248]**QC REVIEWED**

 

Prior History of Accidents:

ACCIDENTAL SPILLAGE OF 37,900 L OF 100% PHENOL IN JULY 1974 CAUSED CHEMICAL CONTAMINATION OF WELLS IN A RURAL AREA OF SOUTHERN WISCONSIN. HUMAN ILLNESS CHARACTERIZED BY DIARRHEA, MOUTH SORES, DARK URINE & BURNING OF THE MOUTH WAS SUBSEQUENTLY REPORTED BY 17 INDIVIDUALS WHO CONSUMED THE CONTAMINATED WATER; THEIR ESTIMATED INTAKE OF PHENOL WAS 10-240 MG/PERSON/DAY.
[BAKER EL ET AL; ARCH ENVIRON HEALTH 33 (2): 89-94 (1978)]**PEER REVIEWED**

A Chessie System freight train derailed in a wooded, rural area near Woodland Park, Michigan in February 1978. Four tank cars were damaged, spilling approx 300,000 lb of vinylidene chloride, 330,000 lb of phenol, and 125,000 lb of ethylene oxide. Most of the phenol, which had solidified on the surface, was removed by a cleanup contractor although residual phenol remained in the soil. The ethylene oxide vaporized, posing no groundwater contamination problems. The vinylidene chloride percolated through the sandy soils into the groundwater about 50 ft below the ground surface. Vinylidene chloride concentrations as high as 300 mg/l were found in monitoring wells near the derailment site. The groundwater cleanup program was completed over a three yr period. ...
[Posthuma AR et al; 1983 Nat Conf Environ Engin p.775-82 (1983)]**PEER REVIEWED**

A description of a fire and explosion in a phenol production plant in 1982 is presented.
[Schwab RF; Loss Prevent Bulletin 83: 28-32 (1988)]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Immediately Dangerous to Life or Health:

250 ppm
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997. 248]**QC REVIEWED**

 

Protective Equipment & Clothing:

SAFETY ... MEASURES ... SHOULD INCLUDE: ... EFFECTIVE VENTILATION. ... SPECIAL PRECAUTION IN TANK CLEANING WHICH SHOULD NOT BE ATTEMPTED WITHOUT PROPER GEAR; FORCED-AIR SUPPLY, RESCUE HARNESS & LIFELINE, HOSE MASK, BOOTS, RUBBER APRON & GLOVES, & A "WATCHER" STATIONED AT ENTRANCE OF TANK.
[International Labour Office. Encyclopedia of Occupational Health and Safety. Vols. I&II. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Office, 1983. 1671]**PEER REVIEWED**

Cloropel, PVC (excellent resistance) or butyl rubber (good resistance) are recommended chemical suit materials for protection against phenol.
[Environment Canada; Tech Info for Problem Spills: Phenol (Draft) p.93 (1981)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Wear appropriate personal protective clothing to prevent skin contact.
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997. 249]**QC REVIEWED**

Wear appropriate eye protection to prevent eye contact.
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997. 249]**QC REVIEWED**

Eyewash fountains should be provided in areas where there is any possbility that workers could be exposed to the substance; this is irrespective of the recommendation involving the wearing of eye protection.
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997. 249]**QC REVIEWED**

Facilities for quickly drenching the body should be provided within the immediate work area for emergency use where there is a possibility of exposure. [Note: It is intended that these facilities provide a sufficient quantity or flow of water to quickly remove the substance from any body areas likely to be exposed. The actual determination of what constitutes an adequate quick drench facility depends on the specific circumstances. In certain instances, a deluge shower should be readily available, whereas in others, the availability of water from a sink or hose could be considered adequate.]
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997. 249]**QC REVIEWED**

Recommendations for respirator selection. Max concn for use: 50 ppm. Respirator Class(es): Any chemical cartridge respirator with organic vapor cartridge(s) in combination with a dust and mist filter. Any supplied-air respirator.
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997. 249]**QC REVIEWED**

Recommendations for respirator selection. Max concn for use: 125 ppm. Respirator Class(es): Any supplied-air respirator operated in a continuous flow mode. Any powered, air-purifying respirator with organic vapor cartridge(s) in combination with a dust and mist filter.
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997. 249]**QC REVIEWED**

Recommendations for respirator selection. Max concn for use: 250 ppm. Respirator Class(es): Any chemical cartridge respirator with a full facepiece and organic vapor cartridge(s) in combination with a high-efficiency particulate filter. Any air-purifying, full-facepiece respirator (gas mask) with a chin-style, front- or back-mounted organic vapor canister having a high-efficiency particulate filter. Any powered, air-purifying respirator with a tight-fitting facepiece and organic vapor cartridge(s) in combination with a high-efficiency particulate filter. Any self-contained breathing apparatus with a full facepiece. Any supplied-air respirator with a full facepiece.
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997. 249]**QC REVIEWED**

Recommendations for respirator selection. Condition: Emergency or planned entry into unknown concn or IDLH conditions: Respirator Class(es): Any self-contained breathing apparatus that has a full facepiece and is operated in a pressure-demand or other positive pressure mode. Any supplied-air respirator that has a full facepiece and is operated in pressure-demand or other positive pressure mode in combination with an auxiliary self-contained breathing apparatus operated in pressure-demand or other positive pressure mode.
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997. 249]**QC REVIEWED**

Recommendations for respirator selection. Condition: Escape from suddenly occurring respiratory hazards: Respirator Class(es): Any air-purifying, full-facepiece respirator (gas mask) with a chin-style, front- or back-mounted organic vapor canister having a high-efficiency particulate filter. Any appropriate escape-type, self-contained breathing apparatus.
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997. 249]**QC REVIEWED**

 

Preventive Measures:

Workmen should not be permitted to enter empty tank which has been filled with phenol until it has been thoroughly cleaned and ... air concn ... is below 5 ppm.
[Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology. 3rd ed., Volumes 1-26. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, 1978-1984.,p. V17 381 (1982)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Areas in which people handle phenol should be equipped with /SRP: isopropyl/ alcohol solution cans and safety showers.
[Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology. 3rd ed., Volumes 1-26. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, 1978-1984.,p. V17 381 (1982)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Contact lenses should not be worn while working with this chemical.
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997. 249]**QC REVIEWED**

SRP: The scientific literature for the use of contact lenses in industry is conflicting. The benefit or detrimental effects of wearing contact lenses depend not only upon the substance, but also on factors including the form of the substance, characteristics and duration of the exposure, the uses of other eye protection equipment, and the hygiene of the lenses. However, there may be individual substances whose irritating or corrosive properties are such that the wearing of contact lenses would be harmful to the eye. In those specific cases, contact lenses should not be worn. In any event, the usual eye protection equipment should be worn even when contact lenses are in place.
**PEER REVIEWED**

If material not on fire and not involved in fire: Keep sparks, flames, and other sources of ignition away. Keep material out of water sources and sewers. Build dikes to contain flow as necessary. Neutralize spilled material with crushed limestone, soda ash, or lime. /Phenol, solid/
[Association of American Railroads. Emergency Handling of Hazardous Materials in Surface Transportation. Washington, DC: Association of American Railroads, Bureau of Explosives, 1994. 853]**PEER REVIEWED**

If material not on fire and not involved in fire: Keep sparks, flames, and other sources of ignition away. Keep material out of water sources and sewers. Build dikes to contain flow as necessary. Do not use water. /Phenol, molten/
[Association of American Railroads. Emergency Handling of Hazardous Materials in Surface Transportation. Washington, DC: Association of American Railroads, Bureau of Explosives, 1994. 852]**PEER REVIEWED**

Personal Protection: Avoid breathing vapors. Keep upwind. Avoid bodily contact with the material. ... Do not handle broken packages unless wearing appropriate personal protective equipment. Wear self-contained breathing apparatus when fighting fires involving this material. /Phenol, solid/
[Association of American Railroads. Emergency Handling of Hazardous Materials in Surface Transportation. Washington, DC: Association of American Railroads, Bureau of Explosives, 1994. 853]**PEER REVIEWED**

Environmental considerations: Land spill: Dig a pit, pond, lagoon, or holding area to contain liquid or solid material. /SRP: If time permits, pits, ponds, lagoons, soak holes, or holding areas should be contained with a flexible impermeable membrane liner./ Cover solids with a plastic sheet to prevent dissolving in rain or fire fighting water. Neutralize with agricultural lime (CaO), crushed limestone (CaCO3) or sodium bicarbonate (NaHCo)3. /Phenol, solid/
[Association of American Railroads. Emergency Handling of Hazardous Materials in Surface Transportation. Washington, DC: Association of American Railroads, Bureau of Explosives, 1994. 853]**PEER REVIEWED**

Environmental considerations: Water spill: If dissolved, in region of 10 ppm or greater concentration, apply activated carbon at ten times the spilled amount. Use mechanical dredges or lifts to remove immobilized masses of pollutants and precipitates. /Phenol, solid/
[Association of American Railroads. Emergency Handling of Hazardous Materials in Surface Transportation. Washington, DC: Association of American Railroads, Bureau of Explosives, 1994. 853]**PEER REVIEWED**

Personnel protection: Avoid breathing vapors. Keep upwind. ... Avoid bodily contact with the material. ... Do not handle broken packages unless wearing appropriate personal protective equipment. /Phenol, molten/
[Association of American Railroads. Emergency Handling of Hazardous Materials in Surface Transportation. Washington, DC: Association of American Railroads, Bureau of Explosives, 1994. 852]**PEER REVIEWED**

Environmental considerations: Air spill: Apply water spray or mist to knock down vapors. Vapor knockdown water is corrosive or toxic and should be diked for containment. /Phenol, solid/
[Association of American Railroads. Emergency Handling of Hazardous Materials in Surface Transportation. Washington, DC: Association of American Railroads, Bureau of Explosives, 1994. 853]**PEER REVIEWED**

SRP: Contaminated protective clothing should be segregated in such a manner so that there is no direct personal contact by personnel who handle, dispose, or clean the clothing. Quality assurance to ascertain the completeness of the cleaning procedures should be implemented before the decontaminated protective clothing is returned for reuse by the workers.
**PEER REVIEWED**

The worker should immediately wash the skin when it becomes contaminated.
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997. 249]**QC REVIEWED**

Work clothing that becomes wet or significantly contaminated should be removed and replaced.
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997. 249]**QC REVIEWED**

Workers whose clothing may have become contaminated should change into uncontaminated clothing before leaving the work premises.
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997. 249]**QC REVIEWED**

 

Stability/Shelf Life:

PRONE TO REDDEN ON EXPOSURE TO AIR AND LIGHT, HASTENED BY PRESENCE OF ALKALI
[The Merck Index. 10th ed. Rahway, New Jersey: Merck Co., Inc., 1983. 1043]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Shipment Methods and Regulations:

No person may /transport,/ offer or accept a hazardous material for transportation in commerce unless that person is registered in conformance ... and the hazardous material is properly classed, described, packaged, marked, labeled, and in condition for shipment as required or authorized by ... /the hazardous materials regulations (49 CFR 171-177)./
[49 CFR 171.2 (7/1/96)]**QC REVIEWED**

The International Air Transport Association (IATA) Dangerous Goods Regulations are published by the IATA Dangerous Goods Board pursuant to IATA Resolutions 618 and 619 and constitute a manual of industry carrier regulations to be followed by all IATA Member airlines when transporting hazardous materials.
[IATA. Dangerous Goods Regulations. 38th ed. Montreal, Canada and Geneva, Switzerland: International Air Transport Association, Dangerous Goods Board, January, 1997. 196]**QC REVIEWED**

The International Maritime Dangerous Goods Code lays down basic principles for transporting hazardous chemicals. Detailed recommendations for individual substances and a number of recommendations for good practice are included in the classes dealing with such substances. A general index of technical names has also been compiled. This index should always be consulted when attempting to locate the appropriate procedures to be used when shipping any substance or article.
[IMDG; International Maritime Dangerous Goods Code; International Maritime Organization p.6198-9 (1988)]**QC REVIEWED**

 

Storage Conditions:

Phenol should be stored in closed containers in an area which is adequate to ensure that airborne phenol concentrations do not exceed 20 mg/cu m. Conditions shall be controlled to prevent overheating and the buildup of pressure in phenol containers. Storage tanks must be electrically grounded and bonded to transfer lines. Transfer and storage systems shall be designed and operated to prevent blockage by condensed phenol. Open flames are prohibited when drums of phenol are heated to melt the contents. The internal pressure will be vented by placing the drums with the bung up and the bung loosened. The bungs shall be tightened prior to moving or handling drums. Drums, carboys, or other containers of phenol shall be closed while being handled or moved. Transfer from such containers shall be done carefully to avoid splashes, spills, or other possible circumstances by which an employee may come in contact with phenol. Bulk storage facilities shall be designed and constructed to contain any leaks or spills.
[NIOSH; Criteria Document: Phenol p.13 (1976) DHEW Pub. NIOSH 76-196]**PEER REVIEWED**

KEEP WELL CLOSED & PROTECTED FROM LIGHT.
[The Merck Index. 10th ed. Rahway, New Jersey: Merck Co., Inc., 1983. 1043]**PEER REVIEWED**

STORE IN COOL, DRY, WELL-VENTILATED LOCATION. SEPARATE FROM OXIDIZERS AND ACUTE FIRE HAZARDS.
[Fire Protection Guide to Hazardous Materials. 12 ed. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association, 1997.,p. 49-103]**QC REVIEWED**

Storage tanks should be equipped with heating coils which pass upward through the entire vessel ... . Tanks may be constructed by either welding or riveting. ... Underground tanks are not recommended.
[Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology. 3rd ed., Volumes 1-26. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, 1978-1984.,p. V17 381 (1982)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Phenolic resins, PVC, neoprene, saran, and polyethylene are generally unsuitable storage container materials for phenol. /From table/
[Ecology and Environment Inc. Toxic Substance Storage Tank Containment. Park Ridge, NJ: Noyes Publications, 1985. 244]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Cleanup Methods:

Eliminate all ignition sources. Control runoff and isolate discharged material for proper disposal. Approach release from upwind.
[Fire Protection Guide to Hazardous Materials. 12 ed. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association, 1997.,p. 49-103]**QC REVIEWED**

Phenolic cmpd in wastewater are oxidized with hydrogen peroxide catalyzed by Fe+3-Fe+2. When the wt ratio of PhOH:H2O2 is 1:3 and iron 5-100 ppm, more than 95% of the phenols are removed in 30 min from a 500 ppm phenol soln at pH 5-6 and 25-50 deg C.
[Greenberg ES; Pap Synth Conf (Proc) 293-303 (1979)]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Disposal Methods:

Generators of waste (equal to or greater than 100 kg/mo) containing this contaminant, EPA hazardous waste number U188, must conform with USEPA regulations in storage, transportation, treatment and disposal of waste.
[40 CFR 240-280, 300-306, 702-799 (7/1/92)]**PEER REVIEWED**

WASTE LIQUOR CONTAINING 50,000 PPM WAS ADJUSTED TO GIVE EFFLUENT CONTAINING 1 PPM THEN TREATED WITH ACTIVATED SLUDGE TO GIVE FINAL EFFLUENT CONTAINING 0.07 PPM, 10% OF WHICH WAS RECYCLED TO CONDITIONING TANK.
[SUMI E; TREATING WASTEWATER CONTAINING FREE PHENOLS; US PATENT 4179365 12/18/79 (SUMITOMO DUREZ CO, LTD)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Chemical Treatability of Phenol; Concentration Process: Reverse Osmosis; Chemical Classification: Phenol; Scale of Study: Batch Flow; Type of Wastewater Used: Pure; Results of Study: -5.7% reduction w/CA membrane; 76.5% reduction w/C-PE1 membrane.
[USEPA; Management of Hazardous Waste Leachate, EPA Contract No. 68-03-2766 p.E-91 (1982)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Chemical Treatability of Phenol; Concentration Process: Reverse Osmosis; Chemical Classification: Phenol; Scale of Study: Pilot scale; Type of Wastewater Used: Synthetic; Results of Study: In excess of 90% separation at pH 8-10 with optimum at pH 9 at flux rate of about 70 gpd/sq ft. Results indicate that hyperfiltration (reverse osmosis) produced higher reduction and flux rates than ultrafiltration. Increasing pressure improves rejection with little effect on flux rate. Concentration had little effect on either rejection or flux rate.
[USEPA; Management of Hazardous Waste Leachate, EPA Contract No. 68-03-2766 p.E-91 (1982)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Chemical Treatability of Phenol; Concentration Process: Biological Treatment; Chemical Classification: Phenol; Scale of Study: Pilot scale; Type of Wastewater Used: Ultrafiltration; Results of Study: Its maximum rejection was 75% at pH 10; rejection increased as pH increased. Ionic state of solute rather than membrane material controlled rejection rate. Increased temp resulted in increased flux rate but rejection rate was only slightly affected. Solute rejection was not affected by length of operation.
[USEPA; Management of Hazardous Waste Leachate, EPA Contract No. 68-03-2766 p.E-94 (1982)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Chemical Treatability of Phenol; Concentration Process: Activated carbon; Chemical Classification: Phenol; Scale of Study: Batch Flow, Laboratory Scale; Type of Wastewater Used: Pure; Results of Study: 100% reduction; 6% desorbed from carbon by elutriation with solvent.
[USEPA; Management of Hazardous Waste Leachate, EPA Contract No. 68-03-2766 p.E-176 (1982)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Chemical Treatability of Phenol; Concentration Process: Activated Carbon; Chemical Classification: Phenol; Scale of Study: Isotherm test; Type of Wastewater Used: Pure; Results of Study: For pH= 3.0 Carbon capacity= 85 mg/g K= 12, 1/n= 0.38, r= 0.92; pt for pH= 7.0 Carbon capacity= 80 mg/g, K= 13, 1/n= 0.77, r= 0.91, For pH= 9.0 carbon capacity= 70 mg/g, K= 22, 1/n= 0.49, r= 0.94.
[USEPA; Management of Hazardous Waste Leachate, EPA Contract No. 68-03-2766 p.E-176 (1982)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Chemical Treatability of Phenol; Concentration Process: Activated Carbon; Chemical Classification: Phenol; Scale of Study: Continuous flow, Pilot Scale; Type of Wastewater Used: Hazardous material; Results of Study: 100% reduction with 8.5 min contact time.
[USEPA; Management of Hazardous Waste Leachate, EPA Contract No. 68-03-2766 p.E-177 (1982)]**PEER REVIEWED**

A good candidate for rotary kiln incineration at a temperature range of 820 to 1,600 deg C and residence times of seconds for liquids and gases, and hours for solids. A good candidate for fluidized bed incineration at a temperature range of 450 to 980 deg C and residence times of seconds for liquids and gases, and longer for solids.
[USEPA; Engineering Handbook for Hazardous Waste Incineration (1981) EPA 68-03-3025]**PEER REVIEWED**

The use of a microdispersion of air in water for in situ treatment of hazardous organic wastes was described. An air microdispersion consisting of 60 to 65% air bubbles, 25 to 50 microns in diameter, in water, referred to as colloidal gas aphrons, was tested for stability and its ability to biodegrade phenol. Seventy to 82% of the air incorporated into a colloidal gas aphrons using a nonionic detergent immediately adhered to a saturated coarse sand after sparging with a fork like probe. Thirty days later, 70 to 80% of initially retained colloidal gas aphrons were still retained in the saturated sand matrix as an air dispersion or as coalesced aphrons. In a biodegradation test, a combination of colloidal gas aphrons and Pseudomonas putida plus microbial nutrients injected into a saturated anaerobic sand matrix containing 300 mg/l phenol solution caused degradation of 60% of the phenol within 24 hr. A 33% colloidal gas aphrons blended with 0.3 g sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate when pumped into 310 g of sand saturated with 300 mg/l phenol caused 100% degradation of phenol after about 24 hr. In a phenol degradation/trough test, a 61% colloidal gas aphrons was injected into a soil bed containing 300 mg/l phenol at a flow rate of 250 ml/min with a slow plow of 75 sec per plow pass. Twenty passes were made at a 10 cm depth. The colloidal gas aphrons effectively treated 6.7 l of water causing a reduction in phenol concentration of 292 to 230 mg/l. Colloidal gas aphrons offers a unique way to introduce oxygen or ozone for treating dissolved, and possibly suspended, organic wastes in saturated impoundment sediments.
[Michelsen DA et al; Fifth Nat Conf Mgmt Uncont Haz Waste Sites pp.398-403 (1987)]**PEER REVIEWED**

The most important method, equally applied by refineries and petrochemical plants, is the biodegradation of phenol (activated sludge basins, aeration ponds, trickling filters). With this a 65-99% degradation of phenol is attained. A further decrease (80-90%) of the phenol content is obtained by treatment with ozone or activated charcoal.
[United Nations. Treatment and Disposal Methods for Waste Chemicals (IRPTC File). Data Profile Series No. 5. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations Environmental Programme, Dec. 1985. 222]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Occupational Exposure Standards:

 

 

OSHA Standards:

Permissible Exposure Limit: Table Z-1 8-hr Time-Weighted Avg: 5 ppm (19 mg/cu m). Skin Designation.
[29 CFR 1910.1000 (7/1/98)]**QC REVIEWED**

 

Threshold Limit Values:

8 hr Time Weighted Avg (TWA) 5 ppm, skin
[American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. TLVs and BEIs. Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices. Cincinnati, OH. 2000. 55]**QC REVIEWED**

Excursion Limit Recommendation: Excursions in worker exposure levels may exceed three times the TLV-TWA for no more than a total of 30 min during a work day, and under no circumstances should they exceed five times the TLV-TWA, provided that the TLV-TWA is not exceeded.
[American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. TLVs and BEIs. Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices. Cincinnati, OH. 2000. 6]**QC REVIEWED**

BEI (Biological Exposure Index): Total phenol in urine at end of shift is 250 mg/g creatinine. The determinant is usually present in a significant amt in biological specimens collected from subjects who have not been occupationally exposed. Such background levels are incl in the BEI value. The determinant is nonspecific, since it is observed after exposure to some other chemicals. These nonspecific tests are preferred because they are easy to use and usually offer a better correlation with exposure than specific tests. In such instances, a BEI for a specific, less quantitative biological determinant is recommended as a confirmatory test. (1987 adoption)
[American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. TLVs and BEIs. Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices. Cincinnati, OH. 2000. 101]**QC REVIEWED**

A4. A4= Not classifiable as a human carcinogen.
[American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. TLVs and BEIs. Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices. Cincinnati, OH. 2000. 55]**QC REVIEWED**

 

NIOSH Recommendations:

Recommended Exposure Limit: 15 Min Ceiling Value: 15.6 ppm (60 mg/cu m), skin.
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997. 248]**QC REVIEWED**

Recommended Exposure Limit: 10 Hr Time-Weighted Avg: 5 ppm (19 mg/cu m).
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997. 248]**QC REVIEWED**

 

Immediately Dangerous to Life or Health:

250 ppm
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997. 248]**QC REVIEWED**

 

Other Occupational Permissible Levels:

Emergency Response Planning Guidelines (ERPG): ERPG(1) 10 ppm (no more than mild, transient effects) for up to 1 hr exposure; ERPG(2) 50 ppm (without serious, adverse effects) for up to 1 hr exposure; ERPG(3) 20 ppm (not life threatening) up to 1 hr exposure.
[American Industrial Hygiene Association. The AIHA 1999 Emergency Response Planning Guidelines and Workplace Environmental Exposure Level Guides Handbook.American Industrial Hygiene Association. Fairfax, VA 1999. 26]**QC REVIEWED**

 

Manufacturing/Use Information:

 

 

Major Uses:

GENERAL DISINFECTANT IN SOLN OR MIXED WITH SLAKED LIME, ETC, FOR TOILETS, STABLES, CESSPOOLS, FLOORS, DRAINS, ETC; MFR OF COLORLESS OR LIGHT-COLORED ARTIFICIAL RESINS, MANY MEDICAL & INDUST ORG CMPD & DYES; REAGENT IN CHEM ANALYSIS
[Budavari, S. (ed.). The Merck Index - Encyclopedia of Chemicals, Drugs and Biologicals. Rahway, NJ: Merck and Co., Inc., 1989. 1150]**PEER REVIEWED**

PHENOL IS BACTERIOSTATIC IN CONCN OF APPROX 0.2%, BACTERICIDAL ABOVE 1%, & FUNGICIDAL ABOVE 1.3%
[Gilman, A.G., L.S.Goodman, and A. Gilman. (eds.). Goodman and Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. 7th ed. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc., 1985. 969]**PEER REVIEWED**

CHEM INT FOR PHENOLIC RESINS & BISPHENOL A
[Gerhartz, W. (exec ed.). Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. 5th ed.Vol A1: Deerfield Beach, FL: VCH Publishers, 1985 to Present.,p. VA19 309]**PEER REVIEWED**

CHEM INT FOR CAPROLACTAM VIA CYCLOHEXANONE
[Gerhartz, W. (exec ed.). Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. 5th ed.Vol A1: Deerfield Beach, FL: VCH Publishers, 1985 to Present.,p. VA19 309]**PEER REVIEWED**

CHEM INT FOR ADIPIC ACID
[Gerhartz, W. (exec ed.). Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. 5th ed.Vol A1: Deerfield Beach, FL: VCH Publishers, 1985 to Present.,p. VA19 309]**PEER REVIEWED**

CHEM INT FOR O-HYDROXYBENZOIC ACID
[SRI]**PEER REVIEWED**

CHEM INT FOR PLASTICIZERS-EG, CRESYL DIPHENYL PHOSPHATE
[SRI]**PEER REVIEWED**

MEDICATION
**QC REVIEWED**

MEDICATION (VET)
**QC REVIEWED**

... Used in germicidal paints and slimicides.
[American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Inc. Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices. 6th ed. Volumes I,II, III. Cincinnati, OH: ACGIH, 1991. 1204]**PEER REVIEWED**

Phenol is a disinfectant effective against vegetative Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria ... and certain viruses.
[Reynolds, J.E.F., Prasad, A.B. (eds.) Martindale-The Extra Pharmacopoeia. 28th ed. London: The Pharmaceutical Press, 1982. 571]**PEER REVIEWED**

Chem int for alkylphenols, such as cresols, xylenols, 4-tert-butylphenol, octylphenols, and nonylphenols; chlorophenols; salycylic acid; aniline.
[Gerhartz, W. (exec ed.). Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. 5th ed.Vol A1: Deerfield Beach, FL: VCH Publishers, 1985 to Present.,p. VA19 309]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Manufacturers:

Allied Signal Inc, Hq, 101 Columbia Rd, PO Box 1057, Morristown, NJ 07962, (201) 455-2000; Allied Signal Engineered Materials Sector; Production site: Margaret and Bermuda St, Philadelphia, PA 19137
[SRI. 1995 Directory of Chemical Producers-United States of America. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International, 1995 808]**PEER REVIEWED**

Aristech Chemical Corp, Hq, 600 Grant St, Pittsburgh, PA 15219-2704, (412) 433-2747; Production site: Ironton, OH 45638
[SRI. 1995 Directory of Chemical Producers-United States of America. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International, 1995 808]**PEER REVIEWED**

BTL Specialty Resins Corp, Hq, 2112 Sylvan Avenue, Toledo, OH 43606, (419) 244-5856; Production site: Blue Island, IL 60406
[SRI. 1995 Directory of Chemical Producers-United States of America. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International, 1995 808]**PEER REVIEWED**

Dakota Gasification Company, Hq, 1600 East Interstate Avenue, Bismark, ND, (701) 221-4400; Production site: Beulah, ND 58523
[SRI. 1995 Directory of Chemical Producers-United States of America. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International, 1995 808]**PEER REVIEWED**

Georgia Gulf Corporation, Hq, PO Box 105197, Atlanta, GA 30348, (404) 395-4500; Production sites: Pasadena, TX 77501, Plaquemine. LA 70764
[SRI. 1995 Directory of Chemical Producers-United States of America. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International, 1995 808]**PEER REVIEWED**

Dow Chemical USA, Hq, 2020 Dow Center, Midland, MI 48674, (517) 636-1000; Production site: Oyster Creek, TX 77541
[SRI. 1995 Directory of Chemical Producers-United States of America. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International, 1995 808]**PEER REVIEWED**

General Electric Co, Hq, 3135 Easton Turnpike, Fairfield, CT 06431 (203) 373-2211, GE Plastics, One Plastics Ave, Pittsfield, MA 01201; Production site: Mount Vernon, IN 47620
[SRI. 1995 Directory of Chemical Producers-United States of America. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International, 1995 808]**PEER REVIEWED**

Kalama Chemical Inc, Hq, The Bank of California Center, Suite 1110, Seattle, WA 98164, (206) 682-7890; Production site: Kalama, WA 98625
[SRI. 1995 Directory of Chemical Producers-United States of America. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International, 1995 808]**PEER REVIEWED**

Merichem Co, 4800 Texas Commerce Tower, Houston, TX 77002-3068, (713) 224-3030; Production site: 1914 Haden Rd, Houston, TX 77015
[SRI. 1995 Directory of Chemical Producers-United States of America. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International, 1995 808]**PEER REVIEWED**

Shell Chemical Co, Hq, One Shell Plaza, PO Box 2463, Houston, TX 77252-2463, (713) 241-6161; Production site: Deer Park, TX 77536 (Houston plant)
[SRI. 1995 Directory of Chemical Producers-United States of America. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International, 1995 808]**PEER REVIEWED**

Texaco Refining and Marketing Inc, Hq, 10 Universal City Plaza, Universal City, CA 91608-1097, (818) 505-2000; Production site: El Dorado, KS 67042
[SRI. 1995 Directory of Chemical Producers-United States of America. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International, 1995 808]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Methods of Manufacturing:

Oxidation of cumene to the corresponding tert-hydroperoxide, and cleavage to phenol and acetone (Hock process).
[Gerhartz, W. (exec ed.). Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. 5th ed.Vol A1: Deerfield Beach, FL: VCH Publishers, 1985 to Present.,p. VA19 301]**PEER REVIEWED**

Toluene oxidation to benzoic acid and subsequent oxidizing decarboxylation to phenol (Dow process).
[Gerhartz, W. (exec ed.). Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. 5th ed.Vol A1: Deerfield Beach, FL: VCH Publishers, 1985 to Present.,p. VA19 301]**PEER REVIEWED**

Sulfonation of benzene to benzene sulfonate and heating in molten alkali hydroxide.
[Gerhartz, W. (exec ed.). Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. 5th ed.Vol A1: Deerfield Beach, FL: VCH Publishers, 1985 to Present.,p. VA19 301]**PEER REVIEWED**

Dehydrogenation of cyclohexanol-cyclohexanone mixtures (Scientific Design).
[Gerhartz, W. (exec ed.). Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. 5th ed.Vol A1: Deerfield Beach, FL: VCH Publishers, 1985 to Present.,p. VA19 301]**PEER REVIEWED**

Chlorination of benzene and steam hydrolysis of the chlorobenzene (Raschig process, Raschig-Hooker, Gulf oxychlorination).
[Gerhartz, W. (exec ed.). Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. 5th ed.Vol A1: Deerfield Beach, FL: VCH Publishers, 1985 to Present.,p. VA19 301]**PEER REVIEWED**

Chlorination of benzene and alkaline hydrolysis of the chlorobenzene.
[Gerhartz, W. (exec ed.). Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. 5th ed.Vol A1: Deerfield Beach, FL: VCH Publishers, 1985 to Present.,p. VA19 301]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

General Manufacturing Information:

Method of purification: Rectification.
[Lewis, R.J., Sr (Ed.). Hawley's Condensed Chemical Dictionary. 12th ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Rheinhold Co., 1993 894]**PEER REVIEWED**

... CONCN OF ABOUT 4 PPM WILL IMPART A DECIDED PHENOL TASTE TO VEGETABLES & FRUIT GROWN WITHIN RADIUS OF MORE THAN A MILE FROM A PLANT WHERE SUCH VAPORS ESCAPE.
[Clayton, G. D. and F. E. Clayton (eds.). Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology: Volume 2A, 2B, 2C: Toxicology. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley Sons, 1981-1982. 2576]**PEER REVIEWED**

Only the Hock process (cumene oxidation) and toluene oxidation are important industrially .... other processes were given up for economic reasons. New plants are now run predominantly on the cumene process.
[Gerhartz, W. (exec ed.). Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. 5th ed.Vol A1: Deerfield Beach, FL: VCH Publishers, 1985 to Present.,p. VA19 301]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Formulations/Preparations:

PHENOL, USP ... LIQUEFIED PHENOL, USP IS PHENOL MAINTAINED IN LIQ STATE BY PRESENCE OF 10% DISTILLED WATER. A NUMBER OF PREPN OF PHENOL IN WATER, OLIVE OIL, & GLYCERIN, AS WELL AS MIXT OF PHENOL & IODINE, & PHENOL & CAMPHOR, FORMERLY HAD OFFICIAL STATUS. PHENOLATED CALAMINE LOTION, USP CONTAINS 1% PHENOL.
[Goodman, L.S., and A. Gilman. (eds.) The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. 5th ed. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc., 1975. 990]**PEER REVIEWED**

MOST DERMATOLOGICAL & ANORECTAL PREPN INCORPORATE PHENOL IN A WAX OR PETROLATUM BASE, WHICH PREVENTS ACCESS TO BACTERIA; OTHERS HAVE TOO LOW A CONCN.
[Goodman, L.S., and A. Gilman. (eds.) The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. 5th ed. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc., 1975. 991]**PEER REVIEWED**

Grades: Fused, crystals or liquid, all as technical (82%, 90%, 95%, other components mostly cresols); CP & USP.
[Lewis, R.J., Sr (Ed.). Hawley's Condensed Chemical Dictionary. 12th ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Rheinhold Co., 1993 894]**PEER REVIEWED**

Phenol is supplied as pure phenol and as 90:10 phenol:water mixt.
[CHEMICAL PRODUCTS SYNOPSIS: Phenol, 1984]**PEER REVIEWED**

ACS loose crystals, ACS double-distilled fused solid, 90% vacuum distilled grades. Ultrapure, crystalline, nucleic acid grades. USP crystal grade, 99.7%, liquified with 10% water.
[Kuney, J.H., J.M. Mullican (eds.). Chemcyclopedia. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society, 1994. 233]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Impurities:

Grades: Fused, crystals or liquid, all as technical (82%, 90%, 95%, other components mostly cresols); CP & USP.
[Lewis, R.J., Sr (Ed.). Hawley's Condensed Chemical Dictionary. 12th ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Rheinhold Co., 1993 894]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Consumption Patterns:

CHEM INT FOR PHENOLIC RESINS, 43.0%; CHEM INT FOR BISPHENOL A, 20.9%; CHEM INT FOR CAPROLACTAM, 17.0%; CHEM INT FOR XYLENOLS, 6.8%; CHEM INT FOR NONYLPHENOL, 2.7%; CHEM INT FOR ADIPIC ACID, 1.8%; CHEM INT FOR O-HYDROXYBENZOIC ACID, 1.3%; CHEM INT FOR DODECYLPHENOL, 1.1%; OTHER, 5.4% (1980)
[SRI]**PEER REVIEWED**

Phenolic resins, 45%; bisphenol-A, 20%; caprolactam, 13%; alkylphenols, 5%; xylenols and cresols, 5%; aniline, 3%; exports, 4%; misc, 5% (1985)
[CHEMICAL PROFILE: Phenol, 1985]**PEER REVIEWED**

Adhesives, 60%; plastics, 20% (1985)
[Chem Eng News 63 (44): 12 (1985)]**PEER REVIEWED**

About half of USA phenol consumption is directly related to the housing and construction industries, while an additional 12-15% is related to automotive applications. ... /The manufacture of/ phenolic resins remains by far the largest single use of phenol, at 1.182 billion lb in 1987, with growth of 0.5% to 1.188 billion, in 1988.
[Savage P; Chemical Week 141 (1): 7 (1987)]**PEER REVIEWED**

CHEMICAL PROFILE: Phenol. Phenolic resins, 38%; bisphenol-A, 23%; caprolactam, 17%; alkylphenols, 4%; xylenols, 4%; aniline, 3%; miscellaneous, 5%; exports, 6%.
[Kavaler AR; Chemical Marketing Reporter 232 (11): 58 (1987)]**PEER REVIEWED**

CHEMICAL PROFILE: Phenol. Demand: 1986: 2,290 million lb; 1987: 3,100 million lb; 1991 /projected/: 3,300 million lb (Includes exports, imports are negligible).
[Kavaler AR; Chemical Marketing Reporter 232 (11): 58 (1987)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Bisphenol-A, 35%; phenolic resins, 34%; caprolactam, 15%; aniline, 5%; alkylphenols, 5%; xylenols, 5%; miscellaneous, 1%.
[Kavaler AR; Chemical Marketing Reporter, September 13, 1993, p 49 (1993)]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

U. S. Production:

2,577,631X10+3 lb of phenol were produced in 1981.
[USITC; Synthetic Organic Chemicals p.95 (1981) USITC Pub 1292]**PEER REVIEWED**

(1978) 1.22X10+12 G
[SRI]**PEER REVIEWED**

(1983) 1.18X10+12 G
[SRI]**PEER REVIEWED**

1.21X10+12 g /From cumene/
[USITC. SYN ORG CHEM-U.S. PROD/SALES (1985) p.29]**PEER REVIEWED**

7.60X10+10 g /From all other sources/
[USITC. SYN ORG CHEM-U.S. PROD/SALES (1985) p.29]**PEER REVIEWED**

(1987) 3.24X10+9 lb (phenol, synthetic)
[USITC. SYN ORG CHEM-U.S. PROD/SALES 1987 PRELIMINARY (2-26-88)]**PEER REVIEWED**

(1990) 3.54 billion lb
[Chem & Engineering News 70 (15): 17 (4/13/92)]**PEER REVIEWED**

(1992) 3.61 billion lb
[Chem & Engineering News 72 (15): 13 (4/11/94)]**PEER REVIEWED**

(1991) 3.60 billion lb
[Chem & Engineering News 71 (15): 11 (4/12/93)]**PEER REVIEWED**

(1993) 3.72 billion lb
[Chem & Engineering News 72 (15): 13 (4/11/94)]**PEER REVIEWED**

1992: 3.74 billion pounds (includes exports, but not imports)
[Kavaler AR; Chemical Marketing Reporter, September 13, 1993, p 49 (1993)]**PEER REVIEWED**

1993: 1,544,222,000 kilograms, of which 1,447,000,000 kilograms was produced synthetically from cumene by oxidation. /Phenol and its salts/
[United States International Trade Commission. Synthetic Organic Chemicals - United States Production and Sales, 1993. USITC Publication 2810, Nov. 1994. Washington, D.C.,p. 3-37]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

U. S. Imports:

(1977) 2.56X10+9 G
[SRI]**PEER REVIEWED**

(1982) 2.60X10+7 G
[SRI]**PEER REVIEWED**

2.69X10+10 g
[BUREAU OF THE CENSUS. U.S. IMPORTS FOR CONSUMPTION AND GENERAL IMPORTS (1985) p.1-547]**PEER REVIEWED**

(1986) 1.95X10+7 lb (phenol and phenol-alcohols nspf)
[BUREAU OF THE CENSUS. US IMPORTS FOR CONSUMPTION AND GENERAL IMPORTS 1986 p.1-494]**PEER REVIEWED**

1992: Less than 10 million pounds/yr.
[Kavaler AR; Chemical Marketing Reporter, September 13, 1993, p 49 (1993)]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

U. S. Exports:

(1978) 1.04X10+11 G
[SRI]**PEER REVIEWED**

(1983) 4.78X10+10 G
[SRI]**PEER REVIEWED**

(1984) 6.40X10+10 g
[BUREAU OF THE CENSUS. U.S. EXPORTS, SCHEDULE E, (1985) p.2-71]**PEER REVIEWED**

(1987) 1.56X10+8 lb (carbolic acid)
[BUREAU OF THE CENSUS. U. S. EXPORTS, SCHEDULE E, OCTOBER 1987, P.2-73]**PEER REVIEWED**

1992: 230-350 million pounds/yr.
[Kavaler AR; Chemical Marketing Reporter, September 13, 1993, p 49 (1993)]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Laboratory Methods:

 

 

Clinical Laboratory Methods:

PHENOL WAS EXTRACTED FROM BLOOD AND ANALYZED BY GAS SOLID CHROMATOGRAPHY USING THE POROUS POLYMER CHROMOSORB 101 AS THE SOLID ADSORBENT. THE DETECTABILITY WAS 0.1 MG/L IN 2 ML OF BLOOD.
[HANDSON PD, HANRAHAN PD; J AGRIC FOOD CHEM 31 (2): 447-8 (1983)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Analyte: Phenol; Matrix: urine; Procedure: Gas chromatography, flame ionization detector; Treatment: acid hydrolysis, extraction; Range: 2-300 ug phenol/ml urine, 2-500 ug p-cresol/ml urine; Controls: pooled urine from unexposed workers; Est Limit of Detection: 0.5 ug/ml urine; Recovery: 94% @ 15 ug phenol/ml urine, 95% @ 50 ug p-cresol/ml urine; Precision: 0.128, 0.091; Interferences: o-phenylphenol has GC retention times similar to phenol
[U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service. Centers for Disease Control, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. NIOSHManual of Analytical Methods, 3rd ed. Volumes 1 and 2 with 1985 supplement, and revisions. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, February 1984.,p. V1 8305-1]**PEER REVIEWED**

Urinary concentration of phenyl sulfate and phenyl glucuronide (0.91) was slightly higher than those between phenol in the air and phenyl sulfate (0.89) or phenyl glucuronide (0.87).
[Ogata M et al; Int Arch Occupat Environ Health 58 (3): 197-202 (1986)]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Analytic Laboratory Methods:

TITRATION ANALYSIS FOR PREPN CONTAINING PHENOL APPLICABLE TO COMMERCIAL CRESOLS, SAPONIFIED CRESOL SOLN, COAL TAR DIPS, & DISINFECTANTS, & TO KEROSENE SOLN OF PHENOLS IN ABSENCE OF SALICYLATES OR BETA-NAPHTHOL. TITRATION ANAL APPLICABLE TO DETECTION OF PHENOL IN PRESENCE OF SALICYLATES.
[Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official Methods of Analysis. 10th ed. and supplements. Washington, DC: Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 1965. New editions through13th ed. plus supplements, 1982.,p. 13/71 5.014]**PEER REVIEWED**

IN ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES EIGHT PHENOLS WERE CONVERTED INTO CORRESPONDING BROMOPHENOLS BY REACTION WITH BROMINE. MIN DETECTABLE AMT OF BROMOPHENOLS WITH AN ELECTRON CAPTURE DETECTOR WAS APPROX 0.01 NG.
[HOSHIKA Y, MUTO G; J CHROMATOGR 179 (1): 105-11 (1979)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Matrix: Air; Procedure: Bubbler collection in dilute sodium hydroxide; GC analysis. Range: 9.46-37.8 mg/cu m
[U.S. Department of Health, Education Welfare, Public Health Service. Center for Disease Control, National Institute for Occupational Safety Health. NIOSH Manual ofAnalytical Methods. 2nd ed. Volumes 1-7. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1977-present.,p. V2 S300-1]**PEER REVIEWED**

Analyte: Phenol; Matrix: air; Procedure: gas chromatography, flame ionization detector; Range: 0.5-6 mg; Est LOD: 10 ug/samp; Precision: 0.044; Interferences: none identified
[U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service. Centers for Disease Control, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. NIOSHManual of Analytical Methods, 3rd ed. Volumes 1 and 2 with 1985 supplement, and revisions. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, February 1984.,p. V2 3502-1]**PEER REVIEWED**

NIOSH Method 8305, Phenol and p-Cresol in urine, issued 8/15/94, GC/FID, acid hydrolysis and extraction, range 2-300 ug/ml urine, estimated limit of detection 0.5 ug/ml.
[U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods. 4th ed.Methods A-Z & Supplements. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, Aug 1994.]**PEER REVIEWED**

NIOSH Method 3502, Phenol, GC/FID, issued 8/15/94, air, solid sorbent tube, working range 5-60 mg/cu m with 100 L air sample, estimated limit of detection 10 ug/sample.
[U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods. 4th ed.Methods A-Z & Supplements. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, Aug 1994.]**PEER REVIEWED**

NIOSH Method 2546, Cresol (all isomers) and Phenol, issued 8/15/94, GC/FID, air, solid sorbent tube, working range 1-60 mg/cu m with 20 L air sample, estimated limit of detection 1-3 ug/sample.
[U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods. 4th ed.Methods A-Z & Supplements. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, Aug 1994.]**PEER REVIEWED**

HPLC with UV detection, reliable quantitation limit 0.041 mg/cu m (0.01 ppm), recommended sampling volume is 24 L.
[OSHA Method No 32, Phenol and Cresol, issued Nov 1981]**PEER REVIEWED**

EPA Method 8410, Determination of Semi-Volatile Organics by Capillary Column GC/FT-IR, identification limit 35 ug/L
[USEPA/Office of Solid Waste (OSW); Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods SW846 Methods (1994)]**PEER REVIEWED**

EPA Method 8270B, Determination of Semi-Volatile Organics by Capillary Column GC/MS, estimated quantitation limit 10 ug/L in water and 660 ug/kg in soil and solid waste.
[USEPA/Office of Solid Waste (OSW); Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods SW846 Methods (1995)]**PEER REVIEWED**

EPA Method 8250A, Determination of Semi-Volatile Organics (After Appropriate Extraction Techniques) by Capillary Column GC/MS, method detection limit 1.5 ug/L.
[USEPA/Office of Solid Waste (OSW); Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods SW846 Methods (1994)]**PEER REVIEWED**

EPA Method 8040A, Determination of Phenols (After Appropriate Extraction Techniques) by Direct Injection Gas Chromatography, method detection limit 2.2 ug/L with ECD detection, 0.14 ug/L with FID detection.
[USEPA/Office of Solid Waste (OSW); Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods SW846 Methods (1992)]**PEER REVIEWED**

EPA Method 604, Determination of phenol and certain substituted phenols in municipal and industrial discharges using gas chromatography. Method detection limit 2.2 ug/L with ECD detection and 0.14 ug/L with FID detection.
[USEPA; EMMI. Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.02. EPA-821-B-92-001 (NTIS PB-92-503093). August 1992]**PEER REVIEWED**

EPA Method 604, Determination of semivolatile toxic organic pollutants and additional compounds amenable to extraction and capillary column GC/MS. Method detection limit 10 ug/L high solids wastewater and 760 ug/kg soil.
[USEPA; EMMI. Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.02. EPA-821-B-92-001 (NTIS PB-92-503093). August 1992]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Sampling Procedures:

Analyte: Phenol; Matrix: air; Sampler: bubbler (0.1 N sodium hydroxide); Flow rate: 0.2-1 l/min; Vol: min: 26 l, max: 240 l; Stability: at least 5 days at 25 deg C
[U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service. Centers for Disease Control, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. NIOSHManual of Analytical Methods, 3rd ed. Volumes 1 and 2 with 1985 supplement, and revisions. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, February 1984.,p. V2 3502-1]**PEER REVIEWED**

Analyte: Phenol and p-cresol; Matrix: urine; Specimen: 2 spot urine samples, before and after exposure; Vol: 50-100 ml in polyethylene screw-cap bottle with preservative; Preservative: few crystals thymol; Controls: pooled urine from unexposed workers; Stability: stable for 4 days at 25 deg C, 3 mo at -4 deg C
[U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service. Centers for Disease Control, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. NIOSHManual of Analytical Methods, 3rd ed. Volumes 1 and 2 with 1985 supplement, and revisions. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, February 1984.,p. V1 8305-1]**PEER REVIEWED**

EPA Method 8040: Phenols. For the detection of phenolic compounds, a representative sample (solid or liquid) is collected in a glass container equipped with a Teflon-lined cap. Care is taken to avoid sample contact with any plastic.
[USEPA; Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste SW-846 (1986)]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Special References:

 

 

Special Reports:

LIAO JT F, OEHME FW; LITERATURE REVIEWS OF PHENOLIC CMPD. I. PHENOL: VET HUM TOXICOL 22 (3): 160-4 (1980). A REVIEW WITH 31 REF ON PHYSICAL & CHEM PROPERTIES; SOURCES, USES, & EXPOSURES; METABOLISM; TOXICITY & MODE OF ACTION; & PATHOLOGY OF PHENOL.

USEPA; Ambient Water Quality Criteria Doc: Phenol (1980) EPA 440/5-80-066.

NIOSH; Criteria Document: Phenol (1976) DHEW Pub. NIOSH 76-196.

USEPA; Summary Review of the Health Effects Assoc with Phenol: Health Issue Assessment. 44p. (1986) EPA/600/8-86/003F. Review of the toxicity, environmental fate and exposure, and occupational exposure to phenol.

Irons RD, Sawahata T; Bioact Foreign Cmpd 259-81 (1985). A review with 93 references on the bioactivation (mainly oxidation) of phenols, catechols, and quinones and the toxicity of their oxidation products.

Kristiansen E; Nordic Expert Group for Documentation of Occupat Exposure 48 pp (1984). A critical survey and evaluation of the relevant literature pertaining to phenol exposure.

Devi CR, Sastry CA; Indian J Environ Prot 7 (4): 271-83 (1987). A review with many references on the toxicity of phenols, especially from wastewater of various industries to fish.

O'Donoghue JL; Neurotox Ind Commer Chem 2: 139-53 (1985). A review with 157 references on the neurotoxicity of phenol, pentachlorophenol, hexachlorophene and 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid.

USEPA; Chem Profile: Phenol (1985). Aspects covered in this data sheet; exposure limits; physicochemical properties; fire and explosion hazards; reactivity; health hazards; uses; handling of spills or releases.

Industrial Accident Assoc; Chemical Safety Information Sheet: Phenol 2p (1986). A chemical safety data sheet regarding toxicity, protective equipment, waste disposal, first aid, fire fighting and hazards.

Safety Practitioner 2 (11): 6-7 (1984). Contents of this data sheet on phenol: physical properties; fire hazard; uses; hazardous reactions; toxicity (acute and chronic exposure) ad biological hazards; safety precautions; medical examination leakage and spillage; handling and storage; first aid measures.

Environment Canada; Tech Info for Problem Spills: Phenol (Draft) (1981).

DHHS/ATSDR; Toxicological Profile for Phenol (1989) ATSDR/TP-89/20

DHEW/NCI; Bioassay of Phenol for Possible Carcinogenicity (1980) Technical Rpt Series No. 203 DHEW Pub No. (NIH) 80-1759

 

Synonyms and Identifiers:

 

 

Synonyms:

A13-01814
**PEER REVIEWED**

ACIDE CARBOLIQUE (FRENCH)
**PEER REVIEWED**

BENZENOL
**PEER REVIEWED**

CARBOLIC ACID
**PEER REVIEWED**

CARBOLSAURE (GERMAN)
**PEER REVIEWED**

Caswell No. 649
**PEER REVIEWED**

FENOL (DUTCH, POLISH)
**PEER REVIEWED**

FENOLO (ITALIAN)
**PEER REVIEWED**

HYDROXYBENZENE
**PEER REVIEWED**

IZAL
**PEER REVIEWED**

MONOHYDROXYBENZENE
**PEER REVIEWED**

MONOPHENOL
**PEER REVIEWED**

NCI-C50124
**PEER REVIEWED**

OXYBENZENE
**PEER REVIEWED**

PHENIC ACID
**PEER REVIEWED**

PHENOLE (GERMAN)
**PEER REVIEWED**

PHENYL ALCOHOL
**PEER REVIEWED**

PHENYL HYDRATE
**PEER REVIEWED**

PHENYL HYDROXIDE
**PEER REVIEWED**

PHENYLIC ACID
**PEER REVIEWED**

PHENYLIC ALCOHOL
**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Formulations/Preparations:

PHENOL, USP ... LIQUEFIED PHENOL, USP IS PHENOL MAINTAINED IN LIQ STATE BY PRESENCE OF 10% DISTILLED WATER. A NUMBER OF PREPN OF PHENOL IN WATER, OLIVE OIL, & GLYCERIN, AS WELL AS MIXT OF PHENOL & IODINE, & PHENOL & CAMPHOR, FORMERLY HAD OFFICIAL STATUS. PHENOLATED CALAMINE LOTION, USP CONTAINS 1% PHENOL.
[Goodman, L.S., and A. Gilman. (eds.) The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. 5th ed. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc., 1975. 990]**PEER REVIEWED**

MOST DERMATOLOGICAL & ANORECTAL PREPN INCORPORATE PHENOL IN A WAX OR PETROLATUM BASE, WHICH PREVENTS ACCESS TO BACTERIA; OTHERS HAVE TOO LOW A CONCN.
[Goodman, L.S., and A. Gilman. (eds.) The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. 5th ed. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc., 1975. 991]**PEER REVIEWED**

Grades: Fused, crystals or liquid, all as technical (82%, 90%, 95%, other components mostly cresols); CP & USP.
[Lewis, R.J., Sr (Ed.). Hawley's Condensed Chemical Dictionary. 12th ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Rheinhold Co., 1993 894]**PEER REVIEWED**

Phenol is supplied as pure phenol and as 90:10 phenol:water mixt.
[CHEMICAL PRODUCTS SYNOPSIS: Phenol, 1984]**PEER REVIEWED**

ACS loose crystals, ACS double-distilled fused solid, 90% vacuum distilled grades. Ultrapure, crystalline, nucleic acid grades. USP crystal grade, 99.7%, liquified with 10% water.
[Kuney, J.H., J.M. Mullican (eds.). Chemcyclopedia. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society, 1994. 233]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Shipping Name/ Number DOT/UN/NA/IMO:

UN 1671; Phenol, solid

UN 2312; Phenol, molten

UN 2821; Phenol solutions

IMO 6.1; Phenol, solid, molten, solutions

 

Standard Transportation Number:

49 212 20; Phenol, carbolic acid

49 212 10; Phenol, liquid, solution, carbolic acid, liquid (liquid tar acid containing over 50% phenol)

 

EPA Hazardous Waste Number:

U188; A toxic waste when a discarded commercial chemical product or manufacturing chemical intermediate or an off-specification commercial chemical product.

 

RTECS Number:

NIOSH/SJ3325000

 

Administrative Information:

 

 

Hazardous Substances Databank Number: 113

Last Revision Date: 20020118

Last Review Date: Reviewed by SRP on 5/16/1996

 

http://www.nycwasteless.com/gov-bus/citysense/ede..
Acute Health Effects:
Inhalation can irritate the mouth, nose, throat, and lungs, causing coughing and/or shortness of breath. Contact can cause severe irritation and burns with possible permanent damage to eyes and skin. High exposure can cause headache, dizziness, fatigue, fainting, weakness, nausea, vomiting, and lack of appetite; may cause collapse and death.

Chronic Health Effects:
May be a carcinogen and mutagen. High or repeated exposure may damage liver, kidneys, and heart. Effects may include reduced memory or concentration, personality changes, fatigue, sleep disturbances, and reduced coordination.

http://www.webcom.com/~bi/tables/health-effects-...
Poison: colic, seizures, cardiac arrhythmias, shock, respiratory arrest. 14 Toxic 11, tremors, lower fetal body weight, possible skin carcinogen, EPA Inhalation data insufficient.16.

ATSDR - Toxicological Profile: Phenol
... Toxicological Profile for. Phenol. CAS# 108-95-2. December 1998 ... toxicological profile
succintly characterizes the toxicologic and adverse health effects ...
http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp115.html
More Results From: www.atsdr.cdc.gov

BEAM
... Phenol causes health effects from both short term (acute less than 14
days) and also long term (chronic greater than 365 days) exposure. ...
http://www.state.me.us/dep/air/beam/factsheets/phenol_fs.htm
More Results From: www.state.me.us

Phenol [factsheet]
... Office of Drinking Water, Washington, DC. 1990. 9. US Environmental Protection Agency.
Health and Environmental Effects Profile for Phenol. EPA/600/x-87/121. ...
http://www.lakes-environmental.com/toxic/PHENOL.HTML
More Results From: www.lakes-environmental.com

IAQ Fact Sheet: Formaldehyde
... Products made of urea formaldehyde can release formaldehyde gas; products made of
phenol formaldehyde generally emit lower ... What Are the Health Effects? ...
http://www.nsc.org/ehc/indoor/formald.htm
More Results From: www.nsc.org

Second Hand Smoke
... and health effects. A source list of studies on which this summary is based can be
obtained by contacting or you can download the PDF version by clicking here. ...
http://www.smoke-free.ca/Health/Healtheffectssmoke.htm
More Results From: www.smoke-free.ca

44 Phenol (PDF)
... Synonyms for phenol include carbolic acid, benzophenol, and hydroxybenzene. Health
Hazards Acute effects: Phenol is irritating and corrosive to the skin. ...
http://www.ehs.berkeley.edu/pubs/factsheets/44phenol.pdf
More Results From: www.ehs.berkeley.edu

CRC Press: ATSDR Online
... at about 40 parts of phenol per billion parts of air (ppb), and begin to smell phenol
in water at about 1–8 parts of phenol ... Because the health effects ...
http://www.atsdr.net/default.asp?cc=80
More Results From: www.atsdr.net

Testing Consent Order For Phenol
... 14 specified companies. In the ECA, the companies agreed to perform
certain health effects tests on phenol (CAS No. 108- 95-2). In ...
http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-TOX/1997/May/Day-23/t13646.htm
More Results From: www.epa.gov

RMHI | Environmental health hazards checklist
... are harmful and how to avoid or minimize the hazardous health effects ... or other protozoa;
* other contaminants: hydrocarbon pollutants (benzene, phenol ...
http://www.rmhiherbal.org/a/e.envirhaz.html

News brief: TERA Focuses on Phenol and Acetaldehyde Assessments
... In the case of phenol, Health Canada had proposed an oral Tolerable
Daily Intake (TDI) for non-cancer health effects. Several issues ...
http://www.riskworld.com/NEWS/97q4/nw7aa052.htm
More Results From: www.riskworld.com

Eco-USA: Phenol
... should be limited to 0.3 milligrams phenol per liter of water (0.3 mg/L) to protect
human health from the possible harmful effects of exposure to phenol by ...
http://www.eco-usa.net/toxics/phenol.shtml
More Results From: www.eco-usa.net

Water Quality Association Chloramine - Are there negative health ...
... What is CHLORAMINE and are there any negative health effects ... Particularly where the
water supply contains phenol, free chlorine readily reacts to form ...
http://www.wqa.org/sitelogic.cfm?ID=348

Car Exhaust, Air Pollution; Heath Effects
... Amounts of benzene (in blood) and phenol (in urine) cannot be used as
yet to predict what degree of harmful health effects may occur. ...
http://www.nutramed.com/environment/carschemicals.htm
More Results From: www.nutramed.com

ATSDR - Public Health Statement: Phenol (1989)
... the test. The test results cannot be used to tell what health effects
might result from exposure to phenol. Measurement of phenol ...
http://www.cla.sc.edu/geog/hrl/sctrap/toxfaqs/phenol.htm
More Results From: www.cla.sc.edu

Society of Occupational Medicine - Consultative Documents - ...
... and phenol and at present are allocated OELs. The change implies that HSC believes
that these three substances could cause the most serious health effects such ...
http://www.som.org.uk/consdocs/nl85/nl85sp_ecd00eafl.html
More Results From: www.som.org.uk

Effects of Dinitrophenol on life forms
... Office: 1990 "Toxicological Profile for Phenol" by Agency for Toxic Substances and
Disease Registry 1986 "Summary Review of the Health Effects of Phenol" by US ...
http://newton.dep.anl.gov/newton/askasci/1995/environ/ENV167.HTM

Chemical Network -- Chemical Industry Directory
... Phenol United States Technical Info Symptoms and treatment of phenol ... Perspective on
the Dangers of Plutonium Publication concerning some health effects ...
http://www.chemnet.com/dir/Chemical_resources/Chemical_data/Safety_and_toxicity_data/index4.html

phenol2
... Health Effects: Phenol can cause serious health effects that increase
as both concentration level and length of exposure increase. ...
http://www.lehigh.edu/kaf3/public/www-data/cchemdata/phenol2.html
More Results From: www.lehigh.edu

Great Lakes Chemical Corporation and the Pathfinders Camp