INFORMATION REGARDING TRICHLOROETHYLENE

http://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/cgi-bin/sis/search/f?./temp/~WTAIw6:1
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
CASRN: 79-01-6

Human Health Effects:

Evidence for Carcinogenicity:

There is limited evidence in humans for the carcinogenicity of trichloroethylene. There is sufficient evidence in experimental animals for the carcinogenicity of trichloroethylene. OVERALL EVALUATION: Trichloroethylene is probably carcinogenic to humans Group 2A. In making the overall evaluation, the working group considered the following evidence: (1) Although the hypothesis linking the formation of mouse liver tumors with peroxisome proliferation is plausible, trichloroethylene also induced tumors at other sites in mice and rats.
[IARC. Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Man. Geneva: World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1972-PRESENT. (Multivolume work).63 136 (1995)]**PEER REVIEWED**

A5. A5= Not suspected as a human carcinogen. (1993) ... The substance has been demonstrated by well-controlled epidemiological studies not to be associated with any increased risk of cancer in exposed humans.
[American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. Threshold Limit Values (TLVs) for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices (BEIs) for 1995-1996. Cincinnati, OH: ACGIH, 1995.34]**PEER REVIEWED**

Human Toxicity Excerpts:

IN ACUTE INHALATION EXPOSURES RAPID COMA MAY ENSUE WITH EVENTUAL DEATH FROM HEPATIC OR RENAL FAILURE. AN OCCASIONAL SUDDEN DEATH SUGGESTS VENTRICULAR FIBRILLATION. SEQUELAE, WHICH MAY BE MORE COMMON AFTER INHALATION THAN AFTER INGESTION, INCLUDE LIVER AND KIDNEY LESIONS, REVERSIBLE TRIGEMINAL (OR OTHER NERVE) DEGENERATION AND PSYCHIC DISTURBANCES.
[Gosselin, R.E., H.C. Hodge, R.P. Smith, and M.N. Gleason. Clinical Toxicology of Commercial Products. 4th ed. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1976.II-112]**PEER REVIEWED**

... Workers exposed @ concn avg about 10 ppm ... complained of headache, dizziness and sleepiness. ... An epidemiology study on the hepatic tumor incidence in subjects working with trichloroethylene ... failed to show a correlation between liver /cancer/ and occupational exposure. ... Another ... study looked at the mortality of 2117 workers exposed to trichloroethylene ... found no correlation between cancer and occupational exposure.
[American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices. 5th ed. Cincinnati, OH: American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 1986.596]**PEER REVIEWED**

Trichloroethylene is only mildly irritating to the skin if allowed to evaporate. From continued use of the material in contact with the skin, defatting can take place.
[Clayton, G.D., F.E. Clayton (eds.) Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology. Volumes 2A, 2B, 2C, 2D, 2E, 2F: Toxicology. 4th ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1993-1994.4196]**PEER REVIEWED**

Fatal hepatic failure has been observed following the use of trichloroethylene as an anesthetic. This effect has occurred in patients with complicating conditions such as malnutrition, toxemias, burns, or those who have received transfusions.
[Dafalque RJ; Clin Pharm Ther 2: 665 (1961) as cited in USEPA; Ambient Water Quality Criteria Document: Trichloroethylene p.C-17 (1980) EPA-440/5/80-007]**PEER REVIEWED**

Prolonged occupational exposure to trichloroethylene has been associated with impairment of peripheral nervous system function, persistent neuritis and temporary loss of tactile sense and paralysis of the fingers after direct contact with the solvent.
[Bardodej Z, Vyskocil J; AMA Arch Ind Health 13: 581 (1956) as cited in USEPA; Ambient Water Quality Criteria Document: Trichloroethylene p.C-17 (1980) EPA 440/5/80-007]**PEER REVIEWED**

A case of severe liver necrosis following a prolonged (4-1/2 hour) use of trichloroethylene as an anesthetic has been reported.
[Herdman KN; Br Med J (3): 689-90 (1945) as cited in Health and Safety Executive Monograph: Trichloroethylene #6 p.14 (1982)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Following chronic and acute overexposure to trichloroethylene during operation of a dry cleaning unit, symptoms included symmetrical bilateral VIIIth cranial nerve deafness as well as cerebral cortical dysrhythmia and alterations in the electroencephalogram. The patient recovered after the exposure stopped.
[Tomasini M, Sartorelli E; Med Lav 62: 277-80 (1971) as cited in USEPA; Health Assessment Document: Trichloroethylene (Draft) p.5-2 (1983) EPA-600/8-82-006B]**PEER REVIEWED**

Acute overexposure to trichloroethylene resulted in chronic involvement of the bulbar cranial nerves and esophageal and pharyngeal motility impairment.
[Lawrence WH, Partyka EK; Ann Int Med 95 (6): 710 (1981) as cited in USEPA; Health Assessment Document: Trichloroethylene (Draft) p.5-2 (1983) EPA-600/8-82-006B]**PEER REVIEWED**

Autopsy findings in a 16 yr old boy who died while sniffing plastic cement containing TCE indicated severe heart failure. ... Liver failure is not the usual cause of death among solvent sniffers, but liver biopsies often reveal toxic centrilobular necrosis.
[Gosselin, R.E., R.P. Smith, H.C. Hodge. Clinical Toxicology of Commercial Products. 5th ed. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1984.II-165]**PEER REVIEWED**

The behavioral effects of exposure to trichloroethylene /indicate that/ laboratory /and work-place/ exposure to 540 or 1080 mg/cu m for 70 min, has no effect on reaction time or short-term memory.
[Gamberale F et al; Scand J Work Environ Health 4: 220-4 (1976) as cited in WHO; Environ Health Criteria 50: Trichloroethylene p.83 (1985)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Chromosome analyses of cultured lymphocytes from 28 workers aged 23-67 who had been employed on degreasing unit using trichloroethylene for 1-21 years showed high rates of hypodiploid cells (9 of 28).
[Konietzko H et al; Arch Toxicol 40 (3): 201-6 (1978)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Evoked trigeminal potentials were studied in 104 subjects occupationally exposed to trichloroethylene. Subjects had an average exposure time of 8.23 yr and an average daily exposure of 7 hr (exposure levels were not given). Controls were 52 healthy nonexposed subjects. Symptoms suffered by 49 of the exposed subjects included dizziness, headache, asthenia, insommnia, mood perturbation, and sexual problems. Eighteen subjects had trigeminal nerve symptoms. These subjects were significantly older (p< 0.001) than asymptomatic subjects. Forty subjects had a pathological trigeminal somatosensory evoked potential. Of these, 28 had a normal trigeminal examination and 12 an abnormal one. For those with trigeminal symptoms, an abnormal trigeminal somatosensory evoked potential was observed in subjects who had the longest and most intense exposure periods.
[Barret L et al; Arch Environ Health 42 (5): 297-302 (1987)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Estimated human lifetime carcinogenic risk: 3.77X10-7 for male and 6.84X10-8 for female /From table, assuming a daily consumption of 1 liter of water containing trichloroethylene in a concn of 1 ug/l/
[National Research Council. Drinking Water & Health. Volume 5. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1983.84]**PEER REVIEWED**

... Eye irritation: 160 ppm; supportable during 30 min: 379-372 ppm; full /SRP: CNS depression/: 2,500-6,000 ppm; severe toxic effects: 2,000 ppm= 10,940 mg/cu m, 60 min; symptoms of illness: 800 ppm= 4,376 mg/cu m; unsatisfactory /exposure level/: > 400 ppm= 2,188 mg/cu m
[Verschueren, K. Handbook of Environmental Data of Organic Chemicals. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1983.1135]**PEER REVIEWED**

... The estimated fatal oral dose in humans is 3-5 ml/kg. The lowest concn produce unconsciousness in adult humans is 16 mg/l (3,000 ppm); the equivalent oral dose is 40-150 ml.
[Gosselin, R.E., R.P. Smith, H.C. Hodge. Clinical Toxicology of Commercial Products. 5th ed. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1984.II-165]**PEER REVIEWED**

77 of 104 trichloroethylene workers showed abnormal electrocardiographic tracings, which may precede permanent heart damage.
[Zenz, C., O.B. Dickerson, E.P. Horvath. Occupational Medicine. 3rd ed. St. Louis, MO., 1994721]**PEER REVIEWED**

Adverse psychological and behavioral abnormalities have been reported in industrial overexposures and include symptoms of headache, fatigue, lightheadedness, depression, insomnia, irritability, and confusion. Cranial and peripheral neuropathies have been associated with industrial and medical use. Selective trigeminal neuralgia has been diagnosed in one study in 20% of trichloroethylene workers by demonstrating electrophysiological abnormalities.
[Ellenhorn, M.J. and D.G. Barceloux. Medical Toxicology - Diagnosis and Treatment of Human Poisoning. New York, NY: Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Inc. 1988.992]**PEER REVIEWED**

Skin: defatting action /of trichloroethylene/ can cause dermatitis.
[U.S. Coast Guard, Department of Transportation. CHRIS - Hazardous Chemical Data. Volume II. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1984-5.]**PEER REVIEWED**

In anesthetic concn, trichloroethylene causes little or no irritation to the respiratory tract. Trichloroethylene causes increased respiratory rate (tachypnea) but decreased alveolar ventilatory amplitude, which is associated with decreased blood oxygen tension and increased carbon dioxide tension.
[Dobkin A, Byles P; Clin Anesth 1: 44-65 (1963) as cited in USEPA; Health Assessment Document: Trichloroethylene (Draft) p.5-11 (1983) EPA-600/8-82-006B]**PEER REVIEWED**

... In almost all cases where a xenobiotic /incl trichloroethylene/ has a terminal carbon with two halides attached, side-chain oxidation mediated by cytochrome p450 will produce a toxic, reactive intermediate.
[Amdur, M.O., J. Doull, C.D. Klaasen (eds). Casarett and Doull's Toxicology. 4th ed. New York, NY: Pergamon Press, 1991.121]**PEER REVIEWED**

Eight men inhaled trichloroethylene at concentrations of 0, 100, 300, and 1000 ppm for 2 hr. Each man received the different concentrations in random order. Five tests of visualmotor performance were administered to each volunteer three times during each 2 hr session, and one additional test was administered immediately before and immediately after exposure. At a concentration of 1000 ppm, the compound adversely affected performance in tests of depth perception, steadiness, and manual skill but had no statistically significant effect on performance in three other standard tests. The small increase in errors associated with 100 and 300 ppm were not statistically significant.
[Hayes, W.J., Jr., E.R. Laws, Jr., (eds.). Handbook of Pesticide Toxicology. Volume 2. Classes of Pesticides. New York, NY: Academic Press, Inc., 1991.694]**PEER REVIEWED**

Six naive volunteers were exposed to trichloroethylene aerosol and vapor for 8 hr in one day (two 4 hr exposures separated by a 1.5 hr interval); the concentration varied from 90 to 130 ppm. A slight sense of dizziness and transient eye irritation occurred during maximal fractuations in concentration. Although there was no objective disturbance of motor function, coordination, equilibrium, or behavior, there was a statistically significant decrement in performance of standard tests of perception, memory, complex reaction time, and manual dexterity. Similar results were obtained when the study was repeated with six workers who were accustomed to the odor of the compound.
[Hayes, W.J., Jr., E.R. Laws, Jr., (eds.). Handbook of Pesticide Toxicology. Volume 2. Classes of Pesticides. New York, NY: Academic Press, Inc., 1991.694]**PEER REVIEWED**

Three volunteers each placed one thumb in trichloroethylene for 30 min. They experienced a burning sensation on the dorsum of their thumbs within 3-18 min, and this burning became moderately severe within 5 min after onset in two persons but remained mild in one. The pain became more intense for several minutes just after the thumbs were removed from the solvent, and tingling persisted for 30 min. Erythema subsided within 2 hr. The compound was measurable in the breath of some volunteers within 10 min after exposure started and in all within 20 min. The mean peak breath concentration was 0.5 ppm.
[Hayes, W.J., Jr., E.R. Laws, Jr., (eds.). Handbook of Pesticide Toxicology. Volume 2. Classes of Pesticides. New York, NY: Academic Press, Inc., 1991.694]**PEER REVIEWED**

Vapors of trichloroethylene are only slightly irritating to the respiratory tract. Premedication with atropine or scopolamine hydrobromide is recommended to eliminate possible mucus secretions. The anesthetic typically accelerates respiratory rate. As the tachypnea progresses, respiratory activity becomes more rapid and shallower. Sudden bursts of tachypnea are sometimes associated directly with surgical stimulation.
[Booth, N.H., L.E. McDonald (eds.). Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 5th ed. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press, 1982.195]**PEER REVIEWED**

A retrospective cohort study of 14,457 workers at an aircraft maintenance facility was undertaken to evaluate mortality associated with exposures in their workplace. The purpose was to determine whether working with solvents, particularly trichloroethylene, posed any excess risk of mortality. The study group consisted of all civilian employees who worked for at least one year at Hill Air Force Base, Utah, between 1 January 1952 and 31 December 1956. Work histories were obtained from /official records/ ... and the cohort was followed up for ascertainment of vital state until 31 December 1982. Observed deaths among white people were compared with the expected numbers of deaths, based on the Utah white population, and adjusted for age, sex and calendar period. Significant deficits occurred for mortality from all causes (SMR 92, 95% CI 90-95), all malignant neoplasms (SMR 90, CI 83-97), ischemic heart disease (SMR 93, 95% CI 88-98), nonmalignant respiratory disease (SMR 87, 95% CI 76-98) and accidents (SMR 61, 95% CI 52-70). Mortality was raised for multiple myeloma in white women (SMR 236, 95% CI 87-514), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in white women (SMR 212, 95% CI 102-390), and cancer of the biliary passages and liver of white men dying after 1980 (SMR 358, 95% CI 116-836). Detailed analysis of 6929 employees occupationally exposed to trichloroethylene, the most widely used solvent at the base during the 1950s and 1960s, did not show any significant or persuasive association between several measures of exposure to trichloroethylene and any excess of cancer. Women employed in departments in which fabric cleaning and parachute repair operations were performed had more deaths than expected from multiple myeloma and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. The inconsistent mortality patterns by sex, multiple and overlapping exposures, and small numbers made it difficult to ascribe these excesses to any particular substance. ...
[Spirtas R et al; Br J Ind Med 48 (8): 515-30 (1991)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Human subjects with high repeated, but non-occupational, exposure may exhibit toxic effects on the liver (e.g., elevated aspartate & alanine aminotransferase), renal insufficiency, & abnormal EEG patterns.
[WHO; Environ Health Criteria 50: Trichloroethylene p.82 (1985)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Acute effects on the CNS are characterized by two sequential phases (i.e., excitation & depression), & are usually reversible. ... In the early phase of excitation, euphoria & inebriation are present. The subsequent phase of CNS depression is characterized by various degrees of narcosis culminating in coma. Muscular hypotomy, muscular spasms, reduced tendon reflexes, & loss of coordination may occur.
[WHO; Environ Health Criteria 50: Trichloroethylene p.82 (1985)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Childhood leukemia in a community in Massachusetts, USA, where water from two wells was contaminated with trichloroethylene /was studied/. Measurements made in 1979 showed a concentration of 267 ppb (ug/l) trichloroethylene in the well water. Twenty cases of childhood leukemia were diagnosed in the community in 1964-83, and these were associated with a significantly higher estimated cumulative exposure to water from the two contaminated wells than a random sample of children from the community (observed cumulative exposure, 21.1; expected cumulative exposure, 10.6; p= 0.03).
[IARC. Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Man. Geneva: World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1972-PRESENT. (Multivolume work).V63 103 (1995)]**PEER REVIEWED**

A study conducted in New Jersey, USA, during 1979-87 included 75 towns, of which 27 were included in a /previous/ study. Trichloroethylene concentrations were measured during 1984-85, and an average level was assigned to each town. The highest level assigned was 67 ug/l. The water supply of six towns contained > 5 ug/l trichloroethylene (average, 23.4 ug/l). Women in these towns had a significantly higher total incidence of leukemia than the inhabitants of towns were the concentration of trichloroethylene in drinking water was < 0.1 ug/l (relative risk, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1-1.9); no such effect was seen for men (1.1, 0.84-1.4). The risk among women was particularly elevated for acute lymphocytic leukemia, chronic lymphocytic leukemia in childhood was also significantly increased, in girls but not in boys. Increased risks for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma were apparent in towns in the highest category of trichloroethylene contamination (0.2; 0.94-1.5 for men and 1.4; 1.1-1.7 for women) and was particularly elevated for high-grade lymphomas.
[IARC. Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Man. Geneva: World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1972-PRESENT. (Multivolume work).V63 104 1995]**PEER REVIEWED**

Trichloroethylene (Tri) caused modest cytotoxicity in freshly isolated human proximal tubular (hPT) cells, as assessed by significant decreases in lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity after 1 hr of exposure to 500 muM Tri. Oxidative metabolism of Tri by cytochrome p450 to form chloral hydrate (CH) was only detectable in kidney microsomes from one patient out of four tested & was not detected in hPT cells. In contrast, GSH conjugation of Tri was detected in cells from every patient tested. The kinetics of Tri metab to its GSH conjugate S-(1,2-dichlorovinyl)glutathione (DCVG) followed biphasic kinetics, with apparent Km & Vmax values of 0.51 & 24.9 mM & 0.10 & 1.0 nmol/min/mg protein, respectively. S-(1,2-dichlorovinyl)-L-cysteine (DCVC), the cysteine conjugate metabolite of Tri that is considered the penultimate nephrotoxic species, caused both time- & concn-dependent increases in LDH release in freshly isolated hPT cells. Preincubation of hPT cells with 0.1 mM aminooxyacetic acid did not protect hPT cells from DCVC-induced cellular injury, suggesting that another enzyme besides the cysteine conjugate beta-lyase may be important in DCVC bioactivation. ... These data indicate that the pathway involved in the cytotoxicity & metab of Tri in hPT cells is the GSH conjugation pathway & that the cytochrome p450-dependent pathway has little direct role in renal Tri metabolism in humans.
[Cummings; Lash LH; Toxicological Sciences 53 (2): 458-466 (2000)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Trichloroethylene (TCE) is both acutely toxic & carcinogenic to the mouse lung following exposure by inhalation. In contrast, it is not carcinogenic in the rat lung & is markedly less toxic following acute exposure. Toxicity to the mouse lung is confined almost exclusively to the nonciliated Clara cell & is characterized by vacuolation & incr in cell replication. Chloral, a metabolite of TCE that accumulates in Clara cells and has been shown to be the cause of the toxicity, also causes aneuploidy in some test systems. Cytotoxicity, increased cell division, & aneuploidy are known risk factors in the development of cancer & provide a plausible mode of action for TCE as a mouse lung carcinogen. All acute & chronic effects of TCE on the mouse lung are believed to be a direct consequence of high cytochrome P450 activity & impaired metab of chloral in Clara cells. Comparisons between species suggest that the ability of the human lung to metabolize TCE is approx 600-fold < that in the mouse. In addtn, the human lung differs markedly from the mouse lung in the number & morphology of its Clara cells. Thus, the large quantitative differences between the metabolic capacity of the mouse lung & the human lung, together with the species differences in the number & morphology of lung Clara cells, suggest that the risks to humans are minimal & that other tumor sites should take precedent over the lung when assessing the potential risks to humans exposed to TCE.
[Green T; Environ Health Perspect 108 (2): 261-264 (2000)]**PEER REVIEWED**

An ecological epidemiological study was conducted with data obtained from an environmental dose-reconstruction study & the Arizona Birth Information Tapes. Before 1981, a portion of the city of Tucson water-distribution system was contaminated with trichloroethylene (i.e., <5 ug/l of water to 107 ug/l of water). Target & comparison populations were selected with a Geographic Information System. Logistical-regression analysis revealed an association between maternal exposure to trichloroethylene via drinking water & very-low-birth-weight babies (i.e., < 1,501 grams) (odds ratio = 3.3; 95% confidence interval = 0.5, 20.6; & Wald chi-square p value = 0.2). No association was found between maternal exposure to trichloroethylene via drinking water & low birth weight or full-term low-birth-weight infants (gestational period > 35 wk & <46 wk).
[Rodenbeck SE et al; Arch Environ Health 55 (3): 188-194 (2000)]**PEER REVIEWED**

... Changes in EKG waves have been observed among persons with exposure to trichloroethylene.
[International Labour Office. Encyclopaedia of Occupational Health and Safety. 4th edition, Volumes 1-4 1998. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Office, 1998.7.22]**PEER REVIEWED**

Human Toxicity Values:

Estimated fatal oral dose 3 to 5 mg/kg
[Ellenhorn, M.J. and D.G. Barceloux. Medical Toxicology - Diagnosis and Treatment of Human Poisoning. New York, NY: Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Inc. 1988.990]**PEER REVIEWED**

Skin, Eye and Respiratory Irritations:

Exposure to trichloroethylene vapor may cause irritation of the eyes, nose, and throat.
[Sittig, M. Handbook of Toxic and Hazardous Chemicals and Carcinogens, 1985. 2nd ed. Park Ridge, NJ: Noyes Data Corporation, 1985.884]**PEER REVIEWED**

Liquid: irritating to skin and eyes.
[U.S. Coast Guard, Department of Transportation. CHRIS - Hazardous Chemical Data. Volume II. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1984-5.]**PEER REVIEWED**

Drug Warnings:

TRICHLOROETHYLENE HAS BEEN REPORTED TO CAUSE CONVULSIONS IN CHILDREN; THEREFORE, IT SHOULD NOT BE USED IN PATIENTS WITH CONVULSIVE DISORDERS.
[Osol, A. (ed.). Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences. 16th ed. Easton, Pennsylvania: Mack Publishing Co., 1980.986]**PEER REVIEWED**

Patients exposed to trichloroethylene should be warned of the potential adverse effects of ethanol ingestion.
[Hansten, P.D. Drug Interactions. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger, 1979.219]**PEER REVIEWED**

Isopropanol and acetone ... cause enhanced hepatotoxicity with ... trichloroethylene.
[Amdur, M.O., J. Doull, C.D. Klaasen (eds). Casarett and Doull's Toxicology. 4th ed. New York, NY: Pergamon Press, 1991.348]**PEER REVIEWED**

...Its anesthetic action is weak. Its low volatility appears in part to be responsible for this effect. ... Apparatus that employs bubbling oxygen assists in accelarating the volatility of the anesthetic to increase its potency. Because of its inherent weakness as an anesthetic, induction of anesthesia is slow. Cardiac arrhythmias produced by the anesthetic are unfavorable. Trichloroethylene cannot be used in a closed circuit with soda lime because of formation of a toxic product.
[Booth, N.H., L.E. McDonald (eds.). Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 5th ed. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press, 1982.195]**PEER REVIEWED**

Relaxation of abdominal musculature is poor during trichloroethylene anesthesia.This effect is similar to other agents (eg, ketamine, alpha-chloralose) that do not induce Stage III anesthesia. Trichloroethylene is considered unsatisfactory for this type of surgery unless it is used in conjunction with a skeletal muscle relaxant. It has very little if any effect upon uterine function. It readly crosses the placenta to reach the fetal circulation of sheep, goats, and probably other species.
[Booth, N.H., L.E. McDonald (eds.). Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 5th ed. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press, 1982.195]**PEER REVIEWED**

Medical Surveillance:

Preplacement and periodic exam should incl the skin, resp, cardiac, central, and peripheral nervous systems, as well as liver and kidney function. Alcohol intake should be evaluated.
[Sittig, M. Handbook of Toxic and Hazardous Chemicals and Carcinogens, 1985. 2nd ed. Park Ridge, NJ: Noyes Data Corporation, 1985.884]**PEER REVIEWED**

Effective medical supervision requires an adequate assessment of the level of exposure. This should be achieved by environmental monitoring ... as well as by biological monitoring.
[International Labour Office. Encyclopedia of Occupational Health and Safety. Vols. I&II. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Office, 1983.2216]**PEER REVIEWED**

/Protect/ from exposure those individuals with diseases of central nervous system, lung, liver, and kidneys.
[ITII. Toxic and Hazardous Industrial Chemicals Safety Manual. Tokyo, Japan: The International Technical Information Institute, 1988.537]**PEER REVIEWED**

PRECAUTIONS FOR "CARCINOGENS": Whenever medical surveillance is indicated, in particular when exposure to a carcinogen has occurred, ad hoc decisions should be taken concerning ... /cytogenetic and/or other/ tests that might become useful or mandatory. /Chemical Carcinogens/
[Montesano, R., H. Bartsch, E.Boyland, G. Della Porta, L. Fishbein, R. A. Griesemer, A.B. Swan, L. Tomatis, and W. Davis (eds.). Handling Chemical Carcinogens in the Laboratory: Problems of Safety. IARC Scientific Publications No. 33. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1979.23]**PEER REVIEWED**

... Changes in EKG waves have been observed among persons with exposure to trichloroethylene.
[International Labour Office. Encyclopaedia of Occupational Health and Safety. 4th edition, Volumes 1-4 1998. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Office, 1998.7.22]**PEER REVIEWED**

The assessment of trichloroethylene exposure can be accomplished through measurement of either trichloroethylene or the metabolite, trichloroethanol. The most reliable biological monitoring test appears to be measurement of trichloroethanol, which has been found to correlate with exposure levels. ... Whole Blood Reference Ranges: Normal - none detected (trichloroethylene, trichloroethanol); Exposed - BEI (sampling time is end of shift at end of workweek, measured as free trichloroethanol) 4.0 mg/l, BAT (sampling time is end of exposure or end of shift, or for long-term exposure sampling time is after several shifts: both measured as the metabolite, trichloroethanol) 5 mg/l; Toxic - levels greater than 1500 ug/l have been associated with onset of coma.
[Ryan, R.P., C.E. Terry (eds.). Toxicology Desk Reference 4th ed. Volumes 1-3. Taylor & Francis, washington, D.C. 1997.2209]**PEER REVIEWED**

The assessment of trichloroethylene exposure can be accomplished through measurement of either trichloroacetic acid or trichloroethanol. These levels have been found to correlate well with exposure levels. ... Urine Reference Ranges: Normal - none detected (trichloroacetic acid or trichloroethanol); Exposed - BEI (sampling time is end of workweek, measured as the metabolite, trichloroacetic acid) 100 mg/g creatinine, BEI (sampling time is end of workweek, measured as the metabolites trichloroacetic acid and trichloroethanol) 300 mg/g creatinine, BAT (sampling time is end of exposure or end of shift, or for long-term exposures sampling time is after several shifts: both measured as the metabolite, trichloroacetic acid) 100 mg/l; Toxic - not established.
[Ryan, R.P., C.E. Terry (eds.). Toxicology Desk Reference 4th ed. Volumes 1-3. Taylor & Francis, washington, D.C. 1997.2209]**PEER REVIEWED**

Liver Function Tests: ... Biochemical tests - Enzymes that reflect cholestasis: alkaline phosphatase (AP), 5'-nucleotidase (5'-NT) /and/ leucine aminopeptidase (LAP); ... Enzymes that detect direct hepatic damage: aspartate aminotransferase (AST) /and/ alanine aminotransferase (ALT). ... Clearance tests - indocyanine green ... antipyrine test ... /and/ serum bile acids.
[Ryan, R.P., C.E. Terry (eds.). Toxicology Desk Reference 4th ed. Volumes 1-3. Taylor & Francis, washington, D.C. 1997.2211]**PEER REVIEWED**

Probable Routes of Human Exposure:

TRICHLOROETHYLENE WHEN PRESENT IN AIR NEAR OPEN ARC WELDING MAY BE DECOMP TO LEVELS OF PHOSGENE DANGEROUS TO HEALTH, WHEREAS THE HCL AND CL2 FORMED SIMULTANEOUSLY MAY NOT ALWAYS PROVIDE AN ADEQUATE WARNING AGAINST THE PRESENCE OF PHOSGENE.
[RINZEMA LC; INT ARCH ARBEITSMED 28 (2): 151 (1971)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Many industrial workers, operating room personnel and dentists are regularly exposed to TCE, some to large doses. The general public encounters trichloroethylene in cleaning fluids, some decaffeinated coffees and spice extracts.
[Gosselin, R.E., R.P. Smith, H.C. Hodge. Clinical Toxicology of Commercial Products. 5th ed. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1984.II-165]**PEER REVIEWED**

NIOSH (NOES Survey 1981-1983) has statistically estimated that 392,805 workers (169,851 of these are female) are potentially exposed to trichloroethylene in the US(1). Occupational exposure to trichloroethylene may occur through inhalation and dermal contact with this compound at workplaces where trichloroethylene is produced or used(SRC). Extensive monitoring data indicate that the general population may be exposed to trichloroethylene via inhalation of ambient air, ingestion of food and drinking water, and dermal contact with this compound and other products containing trichloroethylene(SRC).
[(1) NIOSH; National Occupational Exposure Survey (NOES) (1983)]**PEER REVIEWED**

An open-top and an enclosed conveyor-loaded production trichloroethylene vapor degreasers had average emission factors of 2.6 g TCE/min and 0.67 g TCE/min, respectively(1). Waste gases from aluminum plasma-etching processes (using chlorine containing etchants) during semiconductor production contained trichloroethylene at an average concn of 315.70 ng /l(2). The number of US workers exposed to TCE is estimated to be 283,000(3). Operating room levels range from 0.3-103 ppm, with an estimated 5000 medical, dental and hospital personnel being routinely exposed(1). Air levels at a dial assembly workshop in Japan measured 25-100 ppm; degreasing room levels, 150-250 ppm(3). Trichloroethylene was detected in 6% of 7705 solvent air samples reported from different industries in Norway and stored in the EXPO occupational exposure database(4).
[(1) Wadden RA et al; Am Ind Hyg Asssoc J 50: 496-500 (1989) (2) Bauer S and Wolff I; in Mat Res Soc Symp Proc 447: 35-41 (1997) (3) IARC; Cadmium, Nickel, Some Epoxides, Miscellaneous Industrial Chemicals and General Consideration on Volatile Anaesthetics 11: 263 (1976) (4) Fjeldstad PE, Woldbaek T; A National Exposure Database Special Publ. - Royal Soc Chem (Natl Inst Occup Hlth, Oslo, Norway) 108(Clean Air Work): 303-10 (1992)]**PEER REVIEWED**

23-41% of trichloroethylene in feed water to showers was lost with a water temperature of 23 to 40 deg C(1). Trichloroethylene was detected in chlorinated swimming pool water from a pool in Gdansk, Poland at concns of not detected (detection limit, on average, 0.01 ug/cu dm) to 13.3 ug/cu dm for 4 different dates in 1991(2).
[(1) Tancrede M et al; Atmos Environ 26A: 1103-11 (1992) (2) Biziuk M et al; Intern J Environ Anal Chem 50: 109-15 (1993)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Body Burden:

Therapeutic or normal blood level 0.1-9 mg%
[Winek, C.L. Drug and Chemical Blood-Level Data 1985. Pittsburgh, PA: Allied Fischer Scientific, 1985.]**PEER REVIEWED**

PERSONAL AIR: The exhaled breath of 73% of 26 smokers and 81% of 43 nonsmokers contained trichloroethylene at unreported concns(1). Breath of 12.5% of 50 individuals living in the Los Angeles area contained trichloroethylene(2). 51.2% of personal air samples collected from these 50 individuals contained trichloroethylene(2). Increased personal air exposures were reported following solvent use, household cleaning, furniture stripping, visiting a dry cleaning shop, photo developing and using paint remover of up to 220 ug/cu m from a baseline of <2 ug/cu m(3). Personal air samples of Los Angeles and Contra Costa residents contained trichloroethylene at concns of 7.8 (n=110, Los Angeles residents, February 1984), 6.4(n=50, Los Angeles residents, May 1984) and 3.8 (n=67, Contra Costa residents, June 1984)(4).
[(1) Gordon SM; J Chrom 511: 291-302 (1990) (2) Hartwell TD et al; Atmos Environ 26A: 1519-27 (1992) (3) Wallace LA et al; pp. 2-181 to 2-185 in 4th Int Conf on Indoor Air Quality and Climate. Germany (1987) (4) Wallace LA et al; Atmos Environ 22: 2141-63 (1988)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Blood samples from 179 of 277 people from the general population contained trichloroethylene at a mean concn of 458 ng/l; a mean blood concn of 763 ng/l was reported from 63 of 113 urban workers as compared to 180 ng/l from 82 of 127 workers(1). Blood samples collected from workers exposed to trichloroethylene in 4 dry-cleaning shops (air concns ranged from 25-40 ppm) contained this compound (median=3.39 umol /l after work (range=0.46-12.71), 0.38 umol /l before work (range=0.15-3.58)(2). Urine samples from the same workers contained the trichloroethylene metabolite, trichloroethanol (median=54.89 umol/mol creatinine, range=5.30-177.67 after work; median=9.70 umol/mol creatinine, range=0.38-35.65 before work)(2). Kidney (n=9), lung (n=13), and muscle (n=16) tissues collected from humans in Turku, Finland in 1987 contained trichloroethylene at 0.7, 0.02, and 0.2 ug/kg, respectively(3). 20% of composite adipose tissue samples collected in FY82 (n=46 composite samples) contained trichloroethylene(4). Breathing air samples from 30 residents of Tokyo, Japan had a mean concn of 2.0 ug/cu m trichloroethylene with a calculated daily intake due to breathing ambient air of 40 ug/person (men 24.9 ug/person; women 51.5 ug/person)(5). Breath samples of Los Angeles and Contra Costa residents contained trichloroethylene at concns of 1.6 (n=110, Los Angeles residents, February 1984), 1.0 (n=50, Los Angeles residents, May 1984) and 0.6 (n=67, Contra Costa residents, June 1984)(6).
[(1) Brugnone F et al; Med Lav 85: 370-89 (1994) (2) Kender LJ et al; Arch Environ Hlth 46: 174-78 (1991) (3) Kroneld R; Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 42: 873-77 (1989) (4) Onstot JD, Stanley JS; Identification of SARA Compounds in Adipose Tissue. Washington DC: US EPS, Office of Toxic Substances, USEPA-560/5-89-003 (1989) (5) Nakahama T et al; Jpn J Toxicol Environ Hlth; 43: 280-84 (1997) (6) Wallace LA et al; Atmos Environ 22: 2141-63 (1988)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Trichloroethylene was detected in mother's milk samples from 4 US urban areas, with 8 of 8 samples testing pos(1). Concns in post-mortem wet tissue samples were 1-32 ppb(2). Breath samples Love Canal residents, Niagara Falls, NY contained a trace of trichloroethylene with 4 of 9 samples pos; blood - 0.09.50 ppb, 6 of 9 samples pos; and urine - 40-550 parts/trillion, 9 of 9 samples pos(3). Concns in whole blood specimens from 250 subjects ranged from not detected to 1.5 ppb, with a 0.4 ppb avg(4).
[(1) Pellizzari ED et al; Bull Contam Toxicol 28: 322-8 (1982) (2) IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Man 11: 263-76 (1976) (3) Barkley J et al; Biomed Mass Spectrom 7: 139-47 (1980) (4) Antoine SR et al; Bull Environ Toxicol 36: 364-71 (1986)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Trichloroethylene was detected in the blood of 13 of 677 samples taken from non-occupationally exposed Americans (detection limit= 0.010 ppb(1). Trichloroethylene was measured in blood samples collected from 79 humans at concns ranging from <0.015 to 0.090 ug/l(2). Exhaled breath from humans following both inhalation and dermal exposures during showering or dermal exposure following bathing using normal tap water contained trichloroethylene at concns up to 0.32 ug/cu m/ug/l(3).
[(1) Ashley DL et al; Clin Chem 40: 1401-4 (1994) (2) Skender L et al; Arch Environ Hlth 49: 445-51 (1994) (3) Weisel CP, Jo W-K; Environ Hlth Perspect 104: 48-51 (1996)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Animal Toxicity Studies:

Evidence for Carcinogenicity:

There is limited evidence in humans for the carcinogenicity of trichloroethylene. There is sufficient evidence in experimental animals for the carcinogenicity of trichloroethylene. OVERALL EVALUATION: Trichloroethylene is probably carcinogenic to humans Group 2A. In making the overall evaluation, the working group considered the following evidence: (1) Although the hypothesis linking the formation of mouse liver tumors with peroxisome proliferation is plausible, trichloroethylene also induced tumors at other sites in mice and rats.
[IARC. Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Man. Geneva: World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1972-PRESENT. (Multivolume work).63 136 (1995)]**PEER REVIEWED**

A5. A5= Not suspected as a human carcinogen. (1993) ... The substance has been demonstrated by well-controlled epidemiological studies not to be associated with any increased risk of cancer in exposed humans.
[American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. Threshold Limit Values (TLVs) for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices (BEIs) for 1995-1996. Cincinnati, OH: ACGIH, 1995.34]**PEER REVIEWED**

Non-Human Toxicity Excerpts:

MUTAGENICITY: MUTATION RESEARCH 86: 355 (1981). MOUSE IN VIVO SOMATIC MUTATION ASSAY (SPOT TEST) - COAT COLOR MUTANTS: POSITIVE.
[GENE-TOX Program: Current Status of Bioassay in Genetic Toxicology. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Toxic Substances and Pesticides. (For program information, contact Environmental Mutagen Information Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Post Office Box Y, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830. Telephone (615) 574-7871)]**PEER REVIEWED**

... REPORTED SYMPTOMS OF CHRONIC INTOXICATION IN DOGS IN 3-8 WEEKS AFTER INHALATION OF 500 TO 750 PPM FOR 4-8 HOURS DAILY, 5-6 DAYS PER WEEK. THE SYMPTOMS CONSISTED OF LETHARGY, ANOREXIA, NAUSEA, VOMITING AND LOSS OF WEIGHT. LIVER DYSFUNCTION WAS ALSO SHOWN IN THESE DOGS.
[American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values for Substances in Workroom Air. Third Edition, 1971. Cincinnati, Ohio: American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 1971. (Plus supplements to 1979)263]**PEER REVIEWED**

... REPEATED EXPOSURE TO 3000 PPM (27 EXPOSURES DURING 36 DAYS) ... CAUSED DISTURBANCES OF EQUILIBRIUM AND COORDINATION ... AFTER ... 1ST WEEK SALIVATION, RESTLESSNESS AND HYPEREXCITABILITY, THEY RECOVERED ... ONLY HISTOLOGICAL ABNORMALITY ... FAT VACUOLES IN ... LIVER OF FEMALE RATS.
[Browning, E. Toxicity and Metabolism of Industrial Solvents. New York: American Elsevier, 1965.197]**PEER REVIEWED**

WHEN SOYA-BEAN MEAL IS EXTRACTED WITH TRICHLOROETHYLENE IT WAS TOXIC TO CATTLE ... THE SYNDROME IN CATTLE IS KNOWN VARIOUSLY AS STOCKMAN DISEASE, DUREN DISEASE AND BARBANT DISEASE.
[Clarke, E.G., and M. L. Clarke. Veterinary Toxicology. Baltimore, Maryland: The Williams and Wilkins Company, 1975.262]**PEER REVIEWED**

CATS AND GUINEA PIGS EXPOSED TO 1000 PPM DAILY FOR 1 1/2 HR ... FROM 10 DAYS TO 10 MONTHS ... IN THOSE WHICH SURVIVED SEVERAL MONTHS, CIRRHOSIS AND BILIARY HYPERPLASIA ... LATTER PROGRESSING IN SOME ANIMALS TO PROLIFERATIVE 'BILIARY ADENOMATOSIS'.
[Browning, E. Toxicity and Metabolism of Industrial Solvents. New York: American Elsevier, 1965.198]**PEER REVIEWED**

GASTRIC INTUBATION OF 2.4 OR 1.2 G/KG BODY WT TRICHLOROETHYLENE 5 TIMES WEEKLY IN MALE B6C3F1 MICE (AGE NOT SPECIFIED) & OF 1.8 OR 0.9 G/KG BODY WT IN FEMALES INDUCED HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMAS IN 30/98 MICE GIVEN LOW DOSE & IN 41/95 (43.2%) MICE GIVEN HIGHER DOSE. HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMAS ... IN 1/40 (2.5%) CONTROL MICE.
[IARC. Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Man. Geneva: World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1972-PRESENT. (Multivolume work).V11 268 (1976)]**PEER REVIEWED**

FEMALE RATS EXPOSED TO VAPORS OF 200 TO 1800 PPM FOR 2 WK SHOWED NO EFFECTS INDICATIVE OF TREATMENT-RELATED MATERNAL TOXICITY, EMBRYOTOXICITY, ... TERATOGENICITY OR BEHAVIORAL DEFECTS. ... /SRP: EVIDENCE OF DEVELOPMENTAL DELAY WAS SEEN/.
[DORFMUELLER MA ET AL; TOXICOLOGY 14 (2): 153-66 (1979)]**PEER REVIEWED**

PURE TRICHLOROETHYLENE STABILIZED BY AMINE BASE, ADMIN BY INHALATION @ 0, 100 & 500 PPM FOR 6 HR/DAY, 5 DAY/WK FOR 18 MO TO /NMRI/ MICE, RATS & SYRIAN HAMSTERS. ONLY FEMALE MICE SHOWED INCR IN MALIGNANT LYMPHOMAS.
[HENSCHLER D ET AL; ARCH TOXICOL 43 (4): 237-48 (1980)]**PEER REVIEWED**

EXPOSURE OF MALE MICE TO TRICHLOROETHYLENE VAPORS DURING 24 HR @ LEVELS OF 50, 202 & 450 PPM DID NOT REVEAL MUTAGENIC EFFECTS IN DOMINANT LETHAL ASSAY.
[SLACIK-ERBEN R ET AL; ARCH TOXICOL 45 (1): 37-44 (1980)]**PEER REVIEWED**

TRICHLOROETHYLENE WAS AMONG HALOGENATED HYDROCARBONS TESTED FOR CARCINOGENICITY BY CHRONIC ADMIN BY 1 OR MORE ROUTES IN HA:ICR SWISS MICE. TCE INACTIVE BY CRITERIA USED.
[VAN DUUREN BL ET AL; J NATL CANCER INST 63 (6): 1433-40 (1979)]**PEER REVIEWED**

... 50 MALE & 50 FEMALE B6C3F1 HYBRID MICE, 5 WK OLD, WERE ADMIN 99% PURE TRICHLOROETHYLENE, CONTAINING 0.19% 1,2-EPOXYBUTANE & 0.09% EPICHLOROHYDRIN IN CORN OIL BY GAVAGE ON 5 DAYS A WK FOR 78 WK. HIGH DOSE MALES RECEIVED 2000-2400 MG/KG BODY WT/DAY, & FEMALE 1400-1800 MG/KG BODY WT/DAY; LOW DOSE MALE & FEMALES RECEIVED 1000-1200 MG/KG BODY WT/DAY & 700-900 MG/KG BODY WT. ALL SURVIVING ANIMALS WERE OBSERVED UNTIL ... 95 WK OF AGE. ... HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA OCCURRED IN 1/20 CONTROL MALES AND 0/20 CONTROL FEMALES, IN 26/50 LOW DOSE MALES & 4/50 LOW DOSE FEMALES, & IN 31/48 HIGH DOSE MALES, 11/47 HIGH DOSE FEMALES. METASTASES OF THE LIVER CELL TUMORS TO THE LUNG WAS FOUND IN 7/98 TREATED MALES & IN 1 CONTROL MALE. LUNG TUMORS OCCURRED IN TREATED ANIMALS OF BOTH SEXES ... ONLY ONE LUNG ADENOMA IN FEMALE.
[IARC. Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Man. Geneva: World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1972-PRESENT. (Multivolume work).V20 555 (1979)]**PEER REVIEWED**

A single 1000 mg/kg body wt dose ... in corn oil was admin by gavage to 50 mice of each sex, and doses of 1000 and 500 mg/kg body wt were given in the same manner to 50 rats of each sex 5 days/wk for 2 yr. For each group of test animals there were corresponding groups of controls composed of 50 animals of each sex. The trichloroethylene was stabilized with an amine antioxidant (diisopropylamine) and contained no detectable traces of 1,2-epoxybutane or epichlorohydrin. ... The results observed in the mice support the previous NCI (1976) findings that trichloroethylene significantly incr the incidence of hepatocellular carcinomas in B6C3F1 mice of both sexes.
[National Research Council. Drinking Water & Health. Volume 5. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1983.82]**PEER REVIEWED**

IN VIVO AND IN VITRO METHODOLOGIES THAT HAVE EMPLOYED THE YEAST SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES POMBE AS GENETIC INDICATOR HAVE BEEN UTILIZED TO INVESTIGATE THE MUTAGENICITY OF TWO TRICHLOROETHYLENE (TCE) SAMPLES OF PURE AND TECHNICAL GRADE. BOTH TCE SAMPLES GAVE NEGATIVE RESULTS FOR IN VIVO AND IN VITRO ASSAYS, WHEREAS THE 2 CONTAMINANTS WERE FOUND MUTAGENIC ONLY IN VITRO.
[ROSSI AM ET AL; TERATOGENESIS CARCINOG MUTAGEN 3 (1): 75 (1983)]**PEER REVIEWED**

No liver lesions or hepatomas were found in NLC mice which had received oral doses of 0.1 ml of a 40% solution of trichloroethylene in oil twice weekly for an unspecified period.
[Fishbein L; Potential Indust Carcins & Mutagens p.147 (1977) USEPA 560/ 5-77-005]**PEER REVIEWED**

Trichloroethylene (3.3 mM) in the presence of a metabolic activating microsomal system induced reverse mutations in Escherichia coli strain K12. It has also been shown to induce frame-shift as well as base substitution mutations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain XV185-14C in the presence of mouse liver homogenate.
[Fishbein L; Potential Indust Carcins & Mutagens p.147 (1977) USEPA 560/ 5-77-005]**PEER REVIEWED**

In rabbits, blood levels of greater than 30 mg/l (following continuous iv infusion of 1-5 mg/kg/min, trichloroethylene) induced positional nystagmus /SRP: rapid movement of the eyeball when the head is held in various positions/.
[Tham R et al; Acta Pharmacol Toxicol 44: 336-42 (1979) as cited in USEPA; Health Assessment Document: Trichloroethylene (Draft) p.5-6 (1983) EPA-600/8-82-006B]**PEER REVIEWED**

ACS purity trichloroethylene induced both point mutation and gene conversion at the ilv and trp loci of the D7 strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in the presence of a mouse liver 10,000 g supernatant metabolizing system. A dose response was observed in both instances over the range of 10-40 mM.
[Bronzetti G et al; J Envir Pathol Toxicol 1: 411-18 (1978) as cited in Health and Safety Executive Monograph: Trichloroethylene #6 p.8 (1982)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Application of 0.1 ml of trichloroethylene directly applied to the eye of a rabbit produced a mild-moderate conjunctivitis with some epithelial abrasions being noted on examination with fluorescein. Microscopic examination on day 7 indicated epithelial keratosis in the process of healing. The eye returned to normal in two weeks.
[Duprat P et al; Eur J Toxicol 3: 171-77 (1976) as cited in Health and Safety Executive Monograph: Trichloroethylene #6 p.6 (1982)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Concentration of 1 mM trichloroethylene induced transformation of rat embryo cells (Fischer rat embryo cell system F1706) in vitro which appeared as a progressively growing foci of cells lacking contact inhibition and by the growth of macroscopic foci when inoculated in semi-solid agar. The transformed cells grew as undifferentiated fibrosarcomas at the site of inoculation in 100% of newborn Fischer rats between 27 and 68 days post-inoculation.
[Price PJ et al; In Vitro 14: 290 (1978) as cited in USEPA; Ambient Water Quality Criteria Document: Trichloroethylene p.C-23 (1980) EPA-440/5/80-007]**PEER REVIEWED**

Chronic administration /by gavage/ of 2400 mg/kg per day of trichloroethylene to male B6C3F1 mice, induced localized cell necrosis, enhanced DNA synthesis, and centrilobular hepatocellular swelling. Prolonged exposure (3 weeks), the primary response was dose-related centrilobular hepatocellular swelling and the occurrence of mineralized (calcified) cells.
[Stott WT et al; Toxicol Appl Pharm 62: 137-51 (1982) as cited in USEPA; Health Assessment Document: Trichloroethylene (Draft) p.4-35 (1983) EPA-600/8-82-006B]**PEER REVIEWED**

Trichloroethylene was non-mutagenic in the Ames Salmonella assay when tested with TA100 in a 10 liter desicator. Exposure levels were as high as 20% in air (v/v) for up to 16 hr. The assay was performed in the presence and absence of a phenobarbital-induced liver S9 fraction from male mice. Chloral hydrate, a metabolite of trichloroethylene, was found to be mutagenic in strain TA100 in the Salmonella standard plate incorporation assay in doses ranging from 0.5 to 10.0 mg/plate. The mutagenic activity was enhanced in the presence of rat liver S9 mix.
[National Research Council. Drinking Water & Health. Volume 5. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1983.81]**PEER REVIEWED**

Sperm exam from mice exposed to 0.3% for 4 hr daily for 5 days revealed incr abnormalities after 28 days.
[Shepard, T.H. Catalog of Teratogenic Agents. 5th ed. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986.572]**PEER REVIEWED**

Rats exposed to 37,000, 42,000, and 56,000 mg/cu m of trichloroethylene vapor for two hours exhibited elevated activities of serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase, glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase, and isocitrate dehydrogenase. Hepatotoxicity (indicated by the increased levels of these hepatic enzymes in the serum) was greatly enhanced by pretreatment with 3-methylcholanthrene.
[Carlson GP; Res Comm Chem Pathol Pharmacol 7: 637 (1974) as cited in USEPA; Ambient Water Quality Document: Trichloroethylene p.C-19 (1980) EPA-440/5/80-007]**PEER REVIEWED**

Trichloroethylene was neither embryotoxic nor teratogenic in Sprague-Dawley rats and Swiss Webster mice inhaling trichloroethylene. These results have been confirmed in two other studies in female rats exposed in one case to 500 ppm and in other to 1800 ppm. Trichloroethylene was found to be weakly mutagenic in Escherichia coli in the presence of a metabolizing system ... or in extensive studies in Drosophila. Positive effects in some studies may be due to epoxy stabilizers sometimes present in trichloroethylene.
[American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices. 5th ed. Cincinnati, OH: American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 1986.596]**PEER REVIEWED**

Female Sprague-Dawley rats were given trichloroethylene (TCE) in distilled drinking water at concentrations of 312, 625, and 1250 mg/l. Dams received TCE from 14 days prior to breeding, throughout gestation, and until the pups were weaned at 21 days of age. Control dams received untreated distilled water. Male offspring of experimental and control dams were used to study exploratory behavior either 28, 60, or 90 days of age. Wheel-running, feeding, and drinking behavior tests in rat pups were conducted for 24 hr/day from 55-60 days of age. At 28 days of age, no difference in exploratory activity was seen among treatment groups. At 60 and 90 days of age, rat pups exposed to /SRP: even the lowest concentrations/ of TCE exibited increased levels of exploration. Rats exposed to 1250 mg/l TCE were more active on the wheel than controls or those exposed to 625 mg/l TCE. No significant differences were detected among treatment groups for the levels or timing of feeding or drinking activities.
[Taylor DH et al; Sci Total Environ 47: 415-20 (1985)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Trichloroethylene was evaluated for mutagenicity in the Salmonella/microsome preincubation assay using the standard protocol approved by the National Toxicology Program. Trichloroethylene was tested doses at doses of 0.01, 0.033, 0.10, 0.333, and 1.0 mg/plate in as many as 5 Salmonella typhimurium strains (TA1535, TA1537, TA97, TA98, and TA100) in the presence and absence of rat or hamster liver S-9. Trichloroethylene was negative in these tests and the highest ineffective dose tested in any S typhimurium strain was 1.0 mg/plate. Slight clearing of the background bacterial lawn occurred in all cultures at the high dose.
[Mortelmans K et al; Environ Mutagen 8: 1-119 (1986)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Affected fathead minnows, 31 days old, in toxicant concentrations ranging from 8.43-77.3 mg/l, lost schooling behavior, swam in a corkscrew/spiral pattern near the surface, were hyperactive & hemorrhaging. Equilibrium loss was not observed prior to death. No effect data were recorded. Individual lengths & weights were not recorded; however, the measured mean weight was 0.109 g. Spike recovery data were not available, but the mean recovery was likely >90%.
[Geiger D.L., Poirier S.H., Brooke L.T., Call D.J., (eds). Acute Toxicities of Organic Chemicals to Fathead Minnows (Pimephales Promelas). Vol. II. Superior, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin-Superior, 1985.33]**PEER REVIEWED**

Trichloroethylene /0.5 ml/ (purity 99.5%) applied to the shaved non-abraded skin of rabbits for 24 hours under an occlusive dressing, produced severe skin irritation.
[Duprat P et al; Eur J Toxicol 9(3): 171-7 (1976) as cited in WHO; Environ Health Criteria 50: Trichloroethylene p.50 (1985)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Trichloroethylene (1.0 ml) /purity not specified/ was applied, occluded in a skin depot, to the clipped skin of a guinea pig. Histological examinations performed at 15 minutes, 1, 4, and 16 hour /indicated/ degenerative changes (pyknotic nuclei) were observed in the epidermis after 15 minutes, and were progressive (pyknosis, karyolysis, junctional separation of the epidermis) up to the end of the study.
[Kronevi T et al; Int J Tiss React 111(1): 21-30 (1981) as cited in WHO; Environ Health Criteria 50: Trichloroethylene p.50 (1985)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Groups of 49-50 female ICR mice 4 weeks of age ... exposed by inhalation to trichloroethylene (purity = 99.8%, with 0.128% carbon tetrachloride, 0.019% benzene, 0.019% epichlorohydrin, and 0.01% 1,1,2-trichlorethane) at 0.270, 810, or 2430 mg/cu m 7 hr/day for 5 days/wk, for 104 weeks. The surviving animals were /sacrificed/ 107 weeks after the start of the study. Mortality was similar in control and treated groups. Lung adenomas were found in 5, 2, 5, and 4 mice in the control, low-dose, mid-dose and high-dose groups, respectively. Adenocarcinomas occurred in 1/49, 3/50, 8/50, and 7/46 mice in the control, low-dose, mid-dose and high-dose groups, respectively; increased incidences in the mid- and high-dose groups were statistically significant compared with controls.
[Fukuda K et al; Ind Health 21: 243-5 (1983) as cited in WHO; Environ Health Criteria 50: Trichloroethylene p.65 (1985)]**PEER REVIEWED**

A pure sample of trichloroethylene, stabilized with thymol /concentration not specified/ did not induce forward mutations at the HGPRT locus of a Chinese hamster V-79 cell line treated in vitro, with or without S9 mix metabolic activation.
[Loprieno N, Abbondandolo A; Comparative Mutagenic Evaluation of Some Industrial Compounds. Proc Symp Short-Term Test Syst Defect Carcinogenesis pp. 333-56 (1980) as cited in WHO; Environ Health Criteria 50: Trichloroethylene p.71 (1985)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Gelatinsorbitol microcapsules containing 44.1% trichloroethylene (TCE) were prepared and mixed in NIH-07 rodent meal diet and provided at microcapsule concentrations of 0 (untreated control group), 1.25, 2.5, 5.0, or 10% (equivalent to 0, 0.55, 1.10, 2.21, or 4.41% TCE in the diet, respectively) to groups of 10 male F344 rats for 14 days. An additional control group received diets containing 5% empty capsules. For comparisions, TCE dissolved in corn oil was administered by gavage to different groups of 10 male rats for 14 consecutive days at dose levels adjusted to correspond to those in the feed study. Treatment-related deaths occurred only in the highest dose group of the gavage study. Body weight gain and feed consumption were reduced in high-dose groups of both the feed and gavage studies. ... Dose-related increases in organ (liver and kidney) weight/body weight ratios, individual cell necrosis in the liver, and hepatic microsomal NADPH cytochrome-c reductase and peroxisomal palmitoyl-CoA oxidase and catalase activities were found in both the dosed-feed and gavage groups. Induction of cytochrome p450 occurred only in the dosed-feed study.
[Melnick RL et al; Fundam Appl Toxicol 8 (4): 432-42 (1987)]**PEER REVIEWED**

... MAJOR CONSIDERATION MUST BE GIVEN TO CUMULATIVE EFFECTS OF THIS COMPOUND. ... IN LONG-TERM FEEDING STUDIES CARRIED OUT BY THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE (1976b), ... MICE (BOTH SEXES, AT BOTH LOW AND HIGH DOSE LEVELS) EXPERIENCED A HIGHLY SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMAS. ... MIKISKOVA AND MIKISKA (1966) DEMONSTRATED THAT TRICHLOROETHANOL HAD A PRONOUNCED DEPRESSANT EFFECT ON THE CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM.
[Doull, J., C.D. Klaassen, and M. D. Amdur (eds.). Casarett and Doull's Toxicology. 2nd ed. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., 1980.475]**PEER REVIEWED**

When fed in drinking water to mice for 4 to 6 months at concentrations of 0, 0.1, 1.0, and 2.5, and 5.0 mg/ml of water, "There was a decreased body weight gain at the highest dose, which could be attributed to a decrease in fluid consumption. The most significant effects attributable to TCE were an increase in liver weight in both sexes accompanied by increased nonprotein sulfhydryl levels in the males, and an increase in kidney weight in both sexes accompanied by increases in protein and ketones in the urine. ... The 6 months average daily doses were 0, 144, 217, 393, and 660 mg/kg body weight for the male mice. Female mice averaged 0, 18, 193, 437, and 793 mg/kg/day.
[Clayton, G.D., F.E. Clayton (eds.) Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology. Volumes 2A, 2B, 2C, 2D, 2E, 2F: Toxicology. 4th ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1993-1994.4197]**PEER REVIEWED**

... Several species of animals /were exposed/ 7 hr/day, 5 days/week for approximately 6 months. At 3000 ppm by volume in air, rats and rabbits both showed an increase in liver and kidney weight. At 400 ppm rats showed an increase in liver and kidney weights and the male rats also showed significantly less growth. Guinea pigs had increased liver weights and the growth of the exposed males was less than the controls. Rabbits showed a slight increase in liver weight. An exposed monkey showed no response at 400 ppm. At 200 ppm, the only effect was depressed growth in guinea pigs. Rats, rabbits, and monkeys showed no response. At a concentration of 100 ppm, none of the species showed any significant response. The maximum concentrations tolerated without adverse effect for the 6 month period were as follows: monkeys, 400 ppm; rats and rabbits, 200 ppm; and guinea pigs, 100 ppm.
[Clayton, G.D., F.E. Clayton (eds.) Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology. Volumes 2A, 2B, 2C, 2D, 2E, 2F: Toxicology. 4th ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1993-1994.4197]**PEER REVIEWED**

... Rats, guinea pigs, dogs, rabbits, and monkeys /were exposed/ 24 hr/day for 90 days to 35 ppm with no effect except slight growth depression. Repeated 8 hr daily exposures to 700 ppm for 90 days were also without effect.
[Clayton, G.D., F.E. Clayton (eds.) Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology. Volumes 2A, 2B, 2C, 2D, 2E, 2F: Toxicology. 4th ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1993-1994.4197]**PEER REVIEWED**

Pregnant /rats and mice and their offsprings/ were exposed for 7 hr to 300 ppm on days 6 to 15 of pregnancy with no evidence of adverse effect on the dams, on reproduction, or on the offspring by any of the usual criteria of a teratogenic study.
[Clayton, G.D., F.E. Clayton (eds.) Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology. Volumes 2A, 2B, 2C, 2D, 2E, 2F: Toxicology. 4th ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1993-1994.4198]**PEER REVIEWED**

In a teratology reproduction study, the NTP fed microencapsulated trichloroethylene to rats and mice at doses as high as 300 mg/kg/day to rats and 750 mg/kg/day to mice with little effect. Sperm motility was reduced 45% in F0, males and 18% in F1, male mice. There is no ready explanation for less response in the F1-generation male mice.
[Clayton, G.D., F.E. Clayton (eds.) Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology. Volumes 2A, 2B, 2C, 2D, 2E, 2F: Toxicology. 4th ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1993-1994.4198]**PEER REVIEWED**

When fed to B6D2F1 mice by gavage on days 1 to 5, 6 to 10, or 10 to 15 (day 1, vaginal plug) trichloroethylene in corn oil cause no reproductive, maternal, or foal effects. Daily dosages were 0, 1/10, or 1/100 of the oral LD50 (2402 mg/kg used as LD50 value). Weanlings were kept for 21 days or 42 days. Trichloroethylene also had no effect on in vitro fertilization.
[Clayton, G.D., F.E. Clayton (eds.) Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology. Volumes 2A, 2B, 2C, 2D, 2E, 2F: Toxicology. 4th ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1993-1994.4198]**PEER REVIEWED**

Apart from two reports in which trichloroethylene weakly induced mutation in Salmonella typhimurium TA1535, purified trichloroethylene did not induce gene mutation in various strains of Salmonella in the absence of metabolic activation; however, trichloroethylene containing directly mutagenic epoxide stabilizers did.
[IARC. Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Man. Geneva: World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1972-PRESENT. (Multivolume work).V63 131 (1995)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Previous epidemiological studies with humans & laboratory studies with chickens & rats linked trichloroethylene (TCE) exposure to cardiac defects. Although the cardiac defects in humans & laboratory animals produced by TCE are diverse, a majority of them involves valvular & septal structures. Progenitors of the valves & septa are formed by an epithelial-mesenchymal cell transformation of endothelial cells in the atrioventricular (AV) canal & outflow tract areas of the heart. Based on these studies, we hypothesized that TCE might cause cardiac valve & septa defects by specifically perturbing epithelial-mesenchymal cell transformation. We tested this hypothesis using an in vitro chick-AV canal culture model. This study shows that TCE affected several elements of epithelial-mesenchymal cell transformation. In particular, TCE blocked the endothelial cell-cell separation process that is associated with endothelial activation. Moreover, TCE inhibited mesenchymal cell formation throughout the concn range tested (50-250 ppm). In contrast, TCE had no effect on the cell migration rate of the fully formed mesenchymal cells. Finally, the expression of 3 proteins (selected as molecular markers of epithelial-mesenchymal cell transformation) was analyzed in untreated & TCE-treated cultures. TCE inhibited the expression of the transcription factor Mox-1 & extracellular matrix (ECM) protein fibrillin 2. In contrast, TCE had no effect on the expression of alpha-smooth muscle actin. These data suggest that TCE may cause cardiac valvular & septal malformations by inhibiting endothelial separation & early events of mesenchymal cell formation in the heart.
[Boyer AS et al; Toxicological Sciences 53 (1): 109-117 (2000)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Strategies are needed for assessing the risks of exposures to airborne toxicants that vary over concns & durations. The goal of this project was to describe the relationship between the concn & duration of exposure to inhaled trichloroethylene (TCE), a representative volatile organic chemical, tissue dose as predicted by a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model, & neurotoxicity. Three measures of neurotoxicity were studied: hearing loss, signal detection behavior, & visual function. The null hypothesis was that exposure scenarios having an equivalent product of concn & duration would produce equal toxic effects, according to the classic linear form of Haber's Rule ... . All experiments used adult male, Long-Evans rats. Acute & repeated exposure to TCE increased hearing thresholds, & acute exposure to TCE impaired signal detection behavior & visual function. Examination of all three measures of neurotoxicity showed that if Haber's Rule were used to predict outcomes across exposure durations, the risk would be overestimated when extrapolating from shorter to longer duration exposures, & underestimated when extrapolating from longer to shorter duration exposures. For the acute effects of TCE on behavior & visual function, the estimated concn of TCE in blood at the time of testing correlated well with outcomes, whereas cumulative exposure, measured as the area under the blood TCE concn curve, did not. ... Models incorporating dosimetry can account for differing exposure scenarios & will therefore improve risk assessments over models considering only parameters of external exposure.
[Boyes WK et al; Environ Health Perspect 108 (2): 317-322 (2000)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Trichloroethylene (TCE) induces liver cancer in mice but not in rats. Three metabolites of TCE may contribute chloral hydrate (CH), dichloroacetate (DCA), & trichloroacetate (TCA). CH & TCA appear capable of only inducing liver tumors in mice, but DCA is active in rats as well. The concns of TCA in blood required to induce liver cancer approach the mM range. Concns of DCA in blood associated with carcinogenesis are in the sub-muM range. The carcinogenic activity of CH is largely dependent on its conversion to TCA &/or DCA. TCA is a peroxisome proliferator in the same dose range that induces liver cancer. Mice with targeted disruptions of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARalpha) are insensitive to the liver cancer-inducing properties of other peroxisome proliferators. Human cells do not display the responses associated with PPARalpha that are observed in rodents. This may be attributed to lower levels of expressed PPARalpha in human liver. DCA treatment produces liver tumors with a different phenotype than TCA. Its tumorigenic effects are closely associated with differential effects on cell replication rates in tumors, normal hepatocytes, & suppression of apoptosis. Growth of DCA-induced tumors has been shown to arrest after cessation of treatment. The DCA & TCA adequately account for the hepatocarcinogenic responses to TCE. Low-level exposure to TCE is not likely to induce liver cancer in humans. Higher exposures to TCE could affect sensitive populations. Sensitivity could be based on different metabolic capacities for TCE or its metabolites or result from certain chronic diseases that have a genetic basis.
[Bull RJ; Environmental Health Perspectives 108 (2): 241-259 (2000)]**PEER REVIEWED**

The possibility that the acute neurotoxic effects of organic solvents change with repeated exposure will affect risk assessment of these pollutants. ... Rats inhaling trichloroethylene (TCE) showed a progressive attenuation of impairment of signal detection behavior across several wk of intermittent exposure, suggesting the development of tolerance. Here, we explored the development of tolerance to TCE during 2 wk of daily exposures, & the degree to which learned behavioral modifications ("behavioral tolerance") could account for the effect. Adult Long-Evans rats were trained to perform a visual signal detection task (SDT) in which a press on one lever yielded food if a visual stimulus (a "signal") had occurred on that trial, & a press on a second lever produced food if no signal had been presented. In two experiments, with 2000 & 2400 ppm of TCE res pectively, trained rats were divided into two groups (n = 8/group) with equivalent accuracy & then exposed to TCE in two-phase studies. In Phase 1, one group of rats received daily SDT tests paired with 70-min TCE exposures, followed by 70-min exposures to clean air after testing. The other group received daily SDT tests in clean air, followed by 70-min exposures to TCE (unpaired exposure & testing). All rats thus received the same number & daily sequence of exposures to TCE that differed only in the pairing with SDT testing. Both concns of TCE disrupted performance of the paired groups & this disruption abated over the 9 days of exposure. In Phase 2, the pairing of exposure & test conditions were reversed for the two groups. The groups that were shifted from unpaired to paired exposures (Unpaired-Paired groups) showed qualitatively similar patterns of deficit & recovery as did the rats whose tests were initially paired with TCE (Paired-Unpaired groups), indicating that task-specific learning was involved in the development of tolerance. Quantitative differences in the magnitude & duration of the effects of TCE in the two groups indicated that other factors, not specific to the SDT, also contributed to the development tolerance to TCE.
[Bushnell PJ et al; Neurotoxicology and Teratology 22 (2): 221-229 (2000)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Exposure of rats to trichloroethylene induces a sustained excretion of large amounts of formic acid in urine. Both of the major metabolites, trichloroethanol & trichloroacetic acid, were found to induce this response, but not the minor metabolite S-(1, 2-dichlorovinyl) cysteine. Other polychlorinated solvents, including carbon tetrachloride & chloroform, also increased urinary formate excretion. Addition of folic acid either to diet or drinking water modulated the response indicating that these rats were folate deficient. Two markers of vitamin B(12) deficiency, methylmalonic acid & 5-methyltetrahydrofolate, were also markedly incr in urine & plasma respectively. The incr in 5-methyltetrahydrofolate is consistent with a folate deficiency caused by an inhibition of the vitamin B(12) dependent methionine salvage pathway. Since both vitamin B(12) & chemicals containing polychlorinated carbon atoms readily form free radicals, it is suggested that trichloroacetic acid & trichloroethanol interact with vitamin B(12) through a free radical mechanism inducing a B(12) deficiency &, as a consequence, a folate deficiency. As a result of the folate deficiency, excess formic acid, which is normally utilised through this pathway, is excreted in urine.
[Dow JL; Green T; Toxicology 146 (2-3): 123-136 (2000)]**PEER REVIEWED**

... There is increasing evidence relating exposure to trichloroethylene /(1,1,2-trichloroethene)/ with autoimmunity. To investigate potential mechanisms, we treated the autoimmune-prone MRL + / + mice with trichloroethylene in the drinking water at 0, 2.5 or 5.0 mg/ml ... . As early as 4 wk of treatment. Western blot analysis showed a dose-dependent incr in the level of trichloroethylene-modified proteins, indicating that a reactive metabolite of trichloroethylene was formed. Significant increases in antinuclear antibodies (ANA) & total serum immunoglobulins were found following 4-8 wk of trichloroethylene treatment, indicating that trichloroethylene was accelerating an autoimmune response. Investigation into possible mechanisms of this autoimmune response revealed that trichloroethylene tre atment dramatically increased the expression of the activation marker CD44 on splenic CD4+ T cells at 4 wk. In addtn, splenic T cells from mice treated for 4 wk with trichloroethylene secreted more IFN-gamma & less IL-4 than control T cells, consistent of a T-helper type 1 (Th1) type immune or inflammatory response. A specific immune response directed against dichloroacetylated proteins was found at 22 wk of trichloroethylene treatment. ... The results suggest that trichloroethylene treatment accelerated an autoimmune response characteristic of MRL + / + mice in association with nonspecific activation of Th1 cells. In addtn, long-term treatment with trichloroethylene led to the initiation of a trichloroethylene-specific immune response.
[Griffin JM et al; Iimmunopharmacology 46 (2): 123-137 (2000)]**PEER REVIEWED**

The mechanism of trichloroethylene-induced liver peroxisome proliferation & the sex difference in response was investigated using wild-type Sv/129 & peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARalpha)-null mice. Trichloroethylene treatment (0.75 g/kg for 2 wk by gavage) resulted in liver peroxisome proliferation in wild-type mice, but not in PPARalpha-null mice, suggesting that trichloroethylene-induced peroxisome proliferation is primarily mediated by PPARalpha. No remarkable sex difference was observed in induction of peroxisome proliferation, as measured morphologically, but a markedly higher induction of several enzymes & PPARalpha protein & mRNA was found in males. On the other hand, trichloroethylene induced liver cytochrome P450 2E1, the principal enzyme responsible for metabolizing trichloroethylene to chloral hydrate, only in males, which resulted in similar expression levels in both sexes after the treatment. Trichloroethylene influenced neither the level of catalase, an enzyme involved in the reduction of oxidative stress, nor aldehyde dehydrogenase, the main enzyme catalyzing the conversion to trichloroacetic acid. These results suggest that trichloroethylene treatment causes a male-specific PPARalpha-dependent increase in cellular oxidative stress.
[Nakajima T et al; CCarcinogenesis 21 (4): 677-682 (2000)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Trichloroethylene (TCE), dichloroacetic acid (DCA), & trichloroacetic acid (TCA) are environmental contaminants that are carcinogenic in mouse liver. 5-Methylcytosine (5-MeC) in DNA is a mechanism that controls the transcription of mRNA, including the protooncogenes, c-jun & c-myc. ... TCE decreased methylation of the c-jun & c-myc genes & increased the level of their mRNAs. Decreased methylation of the protooncogenes could be a result of a deficiency in S-adenosylmethionine (SAM), so that methionine, by increasing the level of SAM, would prevent hypomethylation of the genes. For 5 days, female B6C3F1 mice were admin, daily by oral gavage, either 1000 mg/kg bw of TCE or 500 mg/kg DCA or TCA. At 30 min after each dose of carcinogen, the mice received, by ip injection, 0, 30, 100, or 450 mg/kg methionine. Mice were euthanized at 100 min after the last dose of DCA, TCA, or TCE. Decreased methylation in the promoter regions of the c-jun & c-myc genes & increased levels of their mRNA & proteins were found in livers of mice exposed to TCE, DCA, & TCA. Methionine prevented both the decreased methylation & the increased levels of the mRNA & proteins of the two protooncogenes. The prevention by methionine of DCA- TCA-, & TCE-induced DNA hypomethylation supports the hypothesis that these carcinogenes act by depleting the availability of SAM. Hence, methionine would prevent DNA hypomethylation by maintaining the level of SAM. Furthermore, the results suggest that the dose of DCA, TCA, or TCE must be sufficient to decrease the level of SAM in order for these carcinogens to be active.
[Tao L et al; Toxicological Sciences 54 (2): 399-407 (2000)]**PEER REVIEWED**

National Toxicology Program Studies:

Toxicology and carcinogenesis studies of trichloroethylene (more than 99% pure, stabilized with 8 ppm diisopropylamine) were conducted by administering the chemical in corn oil by gavage at doses of 0, 500, or 1000 mg/kg/day 5 days/wk for 103 wk to groups of 50 male and 50 female ACI, August, Marshall, and Osborne-Mendel rats. ... Under the conditions of these two yr gavage studies of trichloroethylene in male and female ACI, August, Marshall, and Osborne-Mendel rats, trichloroethylene administration caused renal tubular cytomegaly and toxic nephropathy in both sexes of the four strains. However, these are considered to be inadequate studies of carcinogenic activity because of chemically induced toxicity, reduced survival, and deficiencies in the conduct of these studies. Despite these limitations, tubular cell neoplasms of the kidney were observed in rats exposed to trichloroethylene and interstitial cell neoplasms of the testis were observed in Marshall rats exposed to trichloroethylene. /Trichloroethylene stabilized with 8 ppm diisopropylamine/
[DHHS/NTP; Toxicology and Carcinogenesis Studies of Trichloroethylene in Four Strains of Rats (Gavage Studies) p.5 (1988) Technical Rpt Series No. 273 NIH Pub No. 88-2529]**PEER REVIEWED**

Carcinogenesis studies of epichlorohydrin-free trichloroethylene (TCE) was conducted by administering the test chemical in corn oil by gavage to groups of 50 male and 50 female F344/N rats and B6C3F1 mice. Dosage levels were 500 and 1,000 mg/kg for rats and 1,000 mg/kg for mice. Trichloroethylene was administered five times per week for 103 weeks, and surviving animals were killed between weeks 103 and 107. Groups of 50 rats and 50 mice of each sex received corn oil by gavage on the same schedule and served as vehicle controls. Groups of 50 male and 50 female rats were used as untreated controls. Epichlorohydrin-free trichloroethylene caused renal tubular-cell neoplasms in male F344/N rats, produced toxic nephrosis in both sexes, and shortened the survival time of males. This experiment in male F344/N rats was considered to be inadequate to evaluate the presence or absence of a carcinogenic response to trichloroethylene. For female F344/N rats receiving trichloroethylene, containing no epichlorohydrin, there was no evidence of carcinogenicity. Trichloroethylene (without epichlorohydrin) was carcinogenic for B6C3F1 mice, causing increased incidences of hepatocellular carcinomas in males and females and of hepatocellular adenomas in females.
[DHHS/NTP; Toxicology and Carcinogenesis Studies of trichloroethylene (without epichlorohydrin) (CAS #79-01-6) in F344/N Rats and B6C3F1 Mice (Gavage Studies) p.7 (1990) Technical Rpt Series No. 243 NIH Pub No. 90-1779]**PEER REVIEWED**

Trichloroethylene (TCE), a common industrial solvent & dry cleaning agent, was tested for its effects on reproduction & fertility in Fisher 344 rats using the RACB protocol. TCE was microencapsulated in a gelatin/sorbitol shell, & added to the diet. Data from a 2 wk dose-range-finding study (Task 1) were used to set exposure concns for the Task 2 continuous cohabitation study at 0.15, 0.30, & 0.60% w/w. Based on the results of the analysis of feed formulations & measures of feed consumption, the daily TCE dosages were nearly equal to 76, 156, & 289 mg/kg/day. In the F0 animals, there were no clinical signs of toxicity, & no animals died during the Task 2 phase. Dam postpartum body weights were reduced at all dose levels during Task 2: from 4-6% at the low dose to nearly equal to 8% at the high dose. There was a monotonic trend to fewer litters/pair (from 3.5 in controls to 2.9 in the high dose group), & the middle & high dose groups had 9% & 16% fewer pups/litter than the controls. Pup weight & viability were unchanged at any dose level. The last litter was reared by the dam. During this 21 day nursing period, viability was not affected by TCE exposure, but body weights were depressed for pups from all treated groups. The decr was not dose-related, & ranged from 9%-20% compared to controls. At 21 & 45 days post-partum, the F1 rats from all groups were tested for behavioral alterations in an open-field test. At 21 days there were no differences across groups, while at 45 days, mice at the high dose crossed the field fewer times, each trip was quicker than controls, & there were fewer rearing episodes, & more time spent grooming. The changes in fertility & pup number seen in Task 2 prompted the conduct of a Task 3 crossover to determine the affected sex using the control & top dose groups. While 100% of the control x control pairs mated, only 75% of the groups containing a treated animal did. There were no differences across groups in terms of the number of pups/litter, or the viability or weight of those pups. An affected sex could not be determined for this compound. After the delivery & assessment of the Task 3 litters, the control & high dose F0 adults were killed & necropsied. The body weight of high-dose treated males was reduced by nearly equal to 4%, while relative liver weight & kidney weight was increased by nearly equal to 24% & 12%, respectively, compared to controls. There were no changes in sperm indices. For females, body weight was reduced by nearly equal to 10%, while relative liver weight was increased by nearly equal to 19% & kidney weight was increased by nearly equal to 7%. The fertility of the second generation was evaluated for all dose groups. There was no treatment-related effect on the proportion of pairs mating or delivering litters, nor were there any differences between the groups in terms of number of pups/litter, or pup viability or weight. After delivery & evaluation of the F2 pups, the F1 adults were killed & necropsied. Male body weights were reduced by 5%, 7%, & 9% (low to high dose groups, respectively). Absolute testis weight was also reduced, by 6-8% in all dosed groups. Adjusted liver weights were increased by 6%, 9%, & 16%, respectively. Seminal vesicle weight was increased by nearly equal to 18% at the middle dose only. Treated female body weights were reduced by 4%, 3%, & 11%, respectively, from low to high dose groups, while adjusted liver weight was increased by 10% at both the middle & high dose levels. Abnormal sperm forms were more numerous at the low dose, approx doubled from 0.54% to 1.13%. No other sperm changes were noted. No vaginal cyclicity data were collected. In sum, these data indicate that TCE produced some general toxicity (reduced body weight gain, increased relative liver & kidney weights) at all doses, while reducing reproductive indices only in the F1 rats at the middle & high dose levels. Thus, TCE was not found to be a selective reproductive toxicant in rats.
[Department of Health & Human Services/National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Toxicology Program; Trichloroethylene (CAS # 79-01-6): Reproduction and Fertility Assessment in F344 Rats When Administered in Feed, NTP Study No. RACB84112 (January 1986) available at http://ntp-server.niehs.nih.gov/htdocs/pub-RT0.html as of August 14, 2002]**QC REVIEWED**

Trichloroethylene (TCE), a common industrial solvent & dry cleaning agent, was tested for its effects on reproduction & fertility in Swiss CD-1 mice using the RACB protocol. TCE was microencapsulated in a gelatin/sorbitol shell, & added to the diet. Data from a 2 wk dose-range-finding study (Task 1) were used to set exposure concns for the Task 2 continuous cohabitation study at 0.15, 0.30, & 0.60% w/w. Based on the results of the analysis of feed formulations & an avg daily feed consumption of nearly equal to 5.0g, the daily TCE dosages were nearly equal to 100, 300, & 700 mg/kg/day. TCE exposure was associated with no adverse clinical signs, & post-partum dam weights during the Task 2 cohabitation phase were not reduced by TCE. The only adverse reproductive change noted during Task 2 was a 4% reduction in pup weight adjusted for litter size at the high dose. The last litter from the control & high dose groups was reared to weaning, for subsequent evaluation of second generation fertility. Maternal TCE exposure during lactation was associated with a significant incr in perinatal mortality: the 28% mortality rate in control litters is significantly less than the 61% mortality rats in the high dose TCE group. After weaning, mortality rates were comparable between the two groups. After the F1 pups were weaned, the F0 control & high dose mice were killed & necropsied. Male body weight was not changed, while absolute testis weight was reduced by 4%, adjusted liver weight was increased by nearly equal to 34%, & adjusted prostate weight was reduced by nearly equal to 16%. Sperm motility was reduced by nearly equal to 45% in the high dose TCE treated animals; no other sperm or reproductive changes were noted. In females, body weight was unchanged while adjusted liver weight was increased by nearly equal to 30%. No histologically-visible changes in vaginal epithelium were noted. Treated mice had a greater incidence of centrilobular hypertrophy, & renal tubular degeneration & corticomedullary epithelial karyomegaly. Males were generally more affected than females. The second generation mice from the control & high dose groups were cohabited at nearly equal to /postnatal day/ 74. No reproductive endpoint was altered by TCE exposure. After evaluation of the F2 pups, the F1 adults were killed & necropsied. Male body weight was unchanged, but adjusted liver weight was increased by nearly equal to 60%, adjusted kidney weight was increased by nearly equal to 9%, & adjusted epididymis weight increased by nearly equal to 9%. The % motile sperm was reduced by nearly equal to 20%, while the proportion of abnormal sperm was increased from a control value of 8%, to 10% in the treated mice. TCE-treated female body weights were not different from controls, while adjusted liver weight & kidney weight were increased by nearly equal to 30% & 16%, respectively. Hepatic & renal microscopic lesions were similar to those noted for the F0 mice. Histologic evaluation of the vaginal epithelium indicated cycling in both groups, but cycles were not assessed in vivo. In summary, TCE exposure to mice via the diet produced significant hepatic & renal toxicity (increased weights & microscopic lesions), reduced sperm motility in both generations, & produced greater lactational mortality in the high dose group. These data suggest that the hepatic/renal/lactational toxicities were more severe than the relatively moderate reductions in sperm motility.
[Department of Health & Human Services/National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Toxicology Program; Trichloroethylene (CAS # 79-01-6): Reproduction and Fertility Assessment in CD-1 Mice When Administered in Feed, NTP Study No. RACB84113 (November 1985) available at http://ntp-server.niehs.nih.gov/htdocs/pub-RT0.html as of August 14, 2002]**QC REVIEWED**

... The purpose of this time course study was to determine the potential effects of trichloroethylene to induce autoimmunity in the Brown Norway Rat model and to determine the time of maximum effect. The studies were conducted in female Brown Norway Rat. The animals were administered trichloroethylene (500 mg/kg) five days a week for an 8-week period by oral gavage. Trichloroethylene was prepared weekly in a 10% Alkamus-deionized water solution. Additional groups of vehicle- and trichloroethylene-exposed animals also received mercuric chloride (1 mg/kg) three times per week by subcutaneous injection for 2 additional weeks. Various parameters of autoimmunity were evaluated weekly, at the time of sacrifice following trichloroethylene treatment, and at time of sacrifice following challenge with mercuric chloride. ... The results of the time course study demonstrate that female Brown Norway rats have a strong aversion to being exposed to trichloroethylene by oral gavage. Furthermore, during the study 3 deaths directly related to chemical exposure were observed in the trichloroethylene exposure group which consisted of 15 animals. Animals exposed to trichloroethylene had decreased body weights compared to the vehicle control animals during the first two weeks of the study and a decrease in body weight gain over the course of the study period. While no effect was observed on spleen, lungs, thymus or adrenal weights, increases were observed in relative kidney (8%) and liver (14%) weights compared to the vehicle controls. When parameters indicative of autoimmune responses were evaluated, no effect was observed on serum IgE levels evaluated weekly, at the time of sacrifice or following challenge with mercuric chloride. No effect was observed on total serum IgG levels at the time of sacrifice; however, a decreased total IgG response was observed in the trichloroethylene-exposed animals following challenge with mercuric chloride. No effect was observed on serum IgG antibody titers to dinitrophenol-human serum albumin (DNP-HSA) evaluated weekly or at the time of sacrifice. Decreased serum IgG antibody titers to DNP-HSA response were observed in the trichloroethylene-exposed animals following challenge with mercuric chloride. While no effect was observed on serum IgG antibody titers to sheep erythrocytes at the time of sacrifice, a decrease in serum IgG antibody titers to sheep erythrocytes was observed in the trichloroethylene-exposed animals following challenge with mercuric chloride. When parameters related to autoimmune disease were evaluated, no effects were observed in blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels at the time of sacrifice or following challenge with mercuric chloride. No effect was observed on urinalysis parameters which included glucose, protein, pH, and blood in the urine as measured using Hema-Combistix. No effect was observed on serum IgG antibody titers to laminin evaluated weekly or at the time of sacrifice. A decrease in serum IgG antibody titers to laminin was observed in the trichloroethylene-exposed animals following challenge with mercuric chloride; however, the decrease did not reach the level of statistical significance. No effects were observed in serum IgG antibody titers to double stranded DNA (dsDNA) at the time of sacrifice or following challenge with mercuric chloride. In conclusion, this time course study demonstrates that exposure to trichloroethylene at a dose level of 500 mg/kg for eight weeks results in significant changes in parameters of autoimmunity and that the time of maximum effect on IgG responses occurred 6 weeks after initiation of trichloroethylene exposure. Although no effects were observed on IgE responses, significant changes were observed in IgG antibody-mediated parameters following mercuric chloride challenge. Trichloroethylene, at a dose level of 500 mg/kg, produced no significant effect on any of the indicators of autoimmune disease. Due to the exposure-related loss of animals at the 500 mg/kg dose level, future studies using the Brown Norway rat should be conducted at lower doses.
[Department of Health & Human Services/National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Toxicology Program; Time Course Autoimmunity Study of Trichloroethylene (CAS No. 79-01-6) in Female Brown Norway Rats, NTP Study No. IMM96007 (January 1997) available at http://ntp-server.niehs.nih.gov/htdocs/pub-IT0.html as of August 21, 2002]**QC REVIEWED**

... Trichloroethylene ... had previously been shown to suppress immune function. Trichloroethylene was selected for study with the intent of performing an interaction study with ethanol with the immune system being the target system. Previous studies were performed by the investigators showing that trichloroethylene, administered in the drinking water to CD-mice for 120 days, suppressed selected parameters of the immune system. The purpose of this range-finding study was to select doses for use in the interaction study. In order for the study to be performed within the confines of an interaction study, the period of exposure was set at 14 days and higher doses than were previously reported were used. The route of administration was by gavage. Corn oil was selected as the vehicle ... . Toxicological parameters assessed were body weight, selected organ weights and selected hematological indicators. The two immunological assays used to assess immune status were the IgM spleen antibody-forming cell (AFC) response to sheep erythrocytes (sRBC) and the cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) response. Tricloroethylene, in doses between and including 50 and 800 mg/kg administered for 14 days, did not alter body weight or body weight gain or change the hematological parameters examined. Trichlorethylene, in doses including and between 100 and 800 mg/kg, caused a dose-related increase in liver weight but no changes in kidney, spleen or thymus weight. Tricloroethylene, in doses between and including 50 and 800 mg/kg administered for 14 days, did not affect the spleen IgM antibody-forming cell response to sheep erythrocytes. Trichlorethylene, in doses including and between 100 and 800 mg/kg, did not affect the cytotoxic T lymphocyte response. ...
[Department of Health & Human Services/National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Toxicology Program; The Immunotoxicity of Trichloroethylene (corn oil) (CAS No. 79-01-6) Dose Range-Finding Study in Female B6C3F1 Mice, NTP Study No. IMM98010 available at http://ntp-server.niehs.nih.gov/htdocs/pub-IT0.html as of August 21, 2002]**QC REVIEWED**

Non-Human Toxicity Values:

LC50 Rat inhalation 26,000 ppm/1 hr.
[Vernot EH; Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 42 (2): 417-24 (1977)]**PEER REVIEWED**

LC50 Rat inhalation 12,000 ppm/4 hr.
[Siegel J; Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 18 (1): 168-74 (1971)]**PEER REVIEWED**

LC50 Mouse inhalation 8450 ppm/4 hr.
[Friberg L; Acta Pharmacol Toxicol 9 (4): 303-12 (1953)]**PEER REVIEWED**

LD50 Rabbit percutaneous 29 g/kg.
[Smyth HF; Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 23 (2): 95-107 (1962)]**PEER REVIEWED**

LD10 Female CD-1 Mouse gavage 1161 mg/kg; male CD-1 mouse gavage 1347 mg/kg.
[Tucker AN et al; Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 62 (3): 351-7 (1982)]**PEER REVIEWED**

LD50 Female CD-1 Mouse gavage 2443 mg/kg; male CD-1 mouse gavage 2402 mg/kg
[Tucker AN et al; Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 62 (3): 351-7 (1982)]**PEER REVIEWED**

LD90 Female CD-1 Mouse gavage 2443 mg/kg; male CD-1 mouse gavage 4253 mg/kg.
[Tucker AN et al; Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 62 (3): 351-7 (1982)]**PEER REVIEWED**

LD100 Female CD-1 Mouse gavage 5500 mg/kg; male CD-1 mouse gavage 6000 mg/kg.
[Tucker AN et al; Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 62(3): 351-357 (1982)]**PEER REVIEWED**

LD50 Mouse inhalation 49,000 ppm/30 min
[Verschueren, K. Handbook of Environmental Data of Organic Chemicals. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1983.1135]**PEER REVIEWED**

Rat inhalation 100 ppm/8 hr, no effect.
[Verschueren, K. Handbook of Environmental Data of Organic Chemicals. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1983.1135]**PEER REVIEWED**

Rabbit inhalation 1,200 ppm/473 hr, no effect.
[Verschueren, K. Handbook of Environmental Data of Organic Chemicals. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1983.1135]**PEER REVIEWED**

Rabbit, ape, rat, guinea pig inhalation 730 ppm/8 hr/day, 6 weeks, no effects.
[Verschueren, K. Handbook of Environmental Data of Organic Chemicals. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1983.1135]**PEER REVIEWED**

LD50 Mouse inhalation 5,500 ppm/10 hr
[Verschueren, K. Handbook of Environmental Data of Organic Chemicals. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1983.1135]**PEER REVIEWED**

LD50 Dog oral 5680 mg/kg
[WHO; Environmental Health Criteria 50; Trichloroethylene p.55 (1985)]**PEER REVIEWED**

LD50 Dog ip 2,800 mg/kg
[WHO; Environmental Health Criteria 50; Trichloroethylene p.55 (1985)]**PEER REVIEWED**

LD50 Rabbit dermal 20 ml/kg
[WHO; Environmental Health Criteria 50; Trichloroethylene p.55 (1985)]**PEER REVIEWED**

LD50 Rat oral 4920 mg/kg
[Hayes, W.J., Jr., E.R. Laws, Jr., (eds.). Handbook of Pesticide Toxicology. Volume 2. Classes of Pesticides. New York, NY: Academic Press, Inc., 1991.690]**PEER REVIEWED**

LD50 Mouse (female) oral 2443 mg/kg
[Hayes, W.J., Jr., E.R. Laws, Jr., (eds.). Handbook of Pesticide Toxicology. Volume 2. Classes of Pesticides. New York, NY: Academic Press, Inc., 1991.690]**PEER REVIEWED**

LD50 Mice (male) oral 2402 mg/kg
[Hayes, W.J., Jr., E.R. Laws, Jr., (eds.). Handbook of Pesticide Toxicology. Volume 2. Classes of Pesticides. New York, NY: Academic Press, Inc., 1991.690]**PEER REVIEWED**

LD50 Mouse ip 3222 mg/kg
[Hayes, W.J., Jr., E.R. Laws, Jr., (eds.). Handbook of Pesticide Toxicology. Volume 2. Classes of Pesticides. New York, NY: Academic Press, Inc., 1991.690]**PEER REVIEWED**

LD50 Dog ip 2783 mg/kg
[Hayes, W.J., Jr., E.R. Laws, Jr., (eds.). Handbook of Pesticide Toxicology. Volume 2. Classes of Pesticides. New York, NY: Academic Press, Inc., 1991.690]**PEER REVIEWED**

Ecotoxicity Values:

LC50 Sheepshead minnow 20 mg/l/96 hr. /Conditions of bioassay not specified/
[Borthwick PW; Results of Toxicity Tests with Fish and Macroinvertebrates. USEPA Environmental Research Laboratory (1977)]**PEER REVIEWED**

LC50 Bluegill sunfish 44,700 ug/l/96 hr. /Static bioassay/
[USEPA; In-Depth Studies on Health and Envir Impacts of Selected Water Poll. Contract No. 68-01-4646 (1978) as cited in Ambient Water Quality Document: Trichloroethylene p.B-2 (1980) EPA-440/5/80-007]**PEER REVIEWED**

LC50 Grass shrimp 2 mg/l/96 hr. /Conditions of bioassay not specified/
[Borthwick PW; Results of Toxicity Tests with Fishes and Macroinvertebrates. USEPA, Envir Research Lab (1977)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Toxicity Threshold (Cell Multiplication Inhibition Test) Entosiphon sulcatum (protozoa) 1200 mg/l /Time not specified, conditions of bioassay not specified/
[Verschueren, K. Handbook of Environmental Data of Organic Chemicals. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1983.1135]**PEER REVIEWED**

Toxicity Threshold (Cell Multiplication Inhibition Test) Uronema parduczi Chatton-Lwoff (protozoa) >960 mg/l /Time not specified, conditions of bioassay not specified/
[Verschueren, K. Handbook of Environmental Data of Organic Chemicals. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1983.1135]**PEER REVIEWED**

Toxicity Threshold (Cell Multiplication Inhibition Test) Scenedesmus quadricauda(green algae) >1000 mg/l /Time not specified, conditions of bioassay not specified/
[Verschueren, K. Handbook of Environmental Data of Organic Chemicals. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1983.1135]**PEER REVIEWED**

Toxicity Threshold (Cell Multiplication Inhibition Test) Microcystis aeruginosa (algae) 63 mg/l /Time not specified, conditions of bioassay not specified/
[Verschueren, K. Handbook of Environmental Data of Organic Chemicals. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1983.1134]**PEER REVIEWED**

LC50 Mexican axolotl (3-4 wk after hatching) 48 mg/l/48 hr /Conditions of bioassay not specified/
[Verschueren, K. Handbook of Environmental Data of Organic Chemicals. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1983.1135]**PEER REVIEWED**

LC50 Clawed toad (3-4 wk after hatching) 45 mg/l/48 hr /Conditions of bioassay not specified/
[Verschueren, K. Handbook of Environmental Data of Organic Chemicals. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1983.1135]**PEER REVIEWED**

LC50 Pimephales promelas (fathead minnow) 40.7 mg/l/96 hr (95% confidence limits 31.4-71.8 mg/l) /Flow-through test/
[Verschueren, K. Handbook of Environmental Data of Organic Chemicals. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1983.1135]**PEER REVIEWED**

LC50 Pimephales promelas (fathead minnow) 66.8 mg/l/96 hr (95% confidence limits 59.6-74.7 mg/l) /Static test/
[Verschueren, K. Handbook of Environmental Data of Organic Chemicals. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1983.1135]**PEER REVIEWED**

EC10 Pimephales promelas (fathead minnow) 15.2 mg/l/24 hr; 16.9 mg/l/48 hr; 15.5 mg/l/72 hr; 13.7 mg/l/96 hr; Toxic effect for all concentrations specified: loss of equilibrium. /Flow-through bioassay/
[Verschueren, K. Handbook of Environmental Data of Organic Chemicals. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1983.1135]**PEER REVIEWED**

EC50 Pimephales promelas (fathead minnow) 23.0 mg/l/24 hr; 22.7 mg/l/48 hr; 22.2 mg/l/72 hr; 21.9 mg/l/96 hr; Toxic effect for all concentrations specified: loss of equilibrium. /Flow-through bioassay/
[Verschueren, K. Handbook of Environmental Data of Organic Chemicals. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1983.1135]**PEER REVIEWED**

EC90 Pimephales promelas (fathead minnow) 36.2 mg/l/24 hr; 30.6 mg/l/48 hr; 31.8 mg/l/72 hr; 34.9 mg/l/96 hr; Toxic effect for all concentrations specified: loss of equilibrium. /Flow-through bioassay/
[Verschueren, K. Handbook of Environmental Data of Organic Chemicals. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1983.1135]**PEER REVIEWED**

Toxicity Threshold (Cell Multiplication Inhibition Test) Pseudomonas putida (bacteria) 65 mg/l
[Verschueren, K. Handbook of Environmental Data of Organic Chemicals. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1983.1134]**PEER REVIEWED**

TSCA Test Submissions:

The ability of trichloroethylene to induce morphological transformation in the BALB/3T3 mouse cell line (Cell Transformation Assay) was evaluated. Based on preliminary toxicity determinations (exposure time=1 day), trichloroethylene was tested at 0, 4, 20, 100 and 250 ug/ml, with cell survival ranging from 125% to 96% relative to untreated controls. The test compound did not produce significantly greater transformation frequencies than untreated controls.
[Arthur D. Little, Inc.; Cell Transformation Assays of 11 Chlorinated Hydrocarbon Analogs. (1983), EPA Document No. 40-8324457, Fiche No. OTS0509392 ]**QC REVIEWED**

The effects of trichloroethylene were examined in the mouse hepatocyte primary culture DNA repair assay. Based on preliminary toxicity tests, trichloroethylene was tested at concentrations of 1, 0.1, 0.01, 0.001, 1x10(-4), 1x10(-5) and 1x10(-6)% in DMSO solvent vehicle. The highest two concentrations were too cytotoxic to evaluate in the assay. The lower levels were not cytotoxic but the 0.01 and 0.001% levels caused a significant increase in the unscheduled DNA synthesis over the solvent control (DMSO).
[Naylor Dana Institute; DNA Repair Tests of 11 Chlorinated Hydrocarbon Analogs. (1983), EPA Document No. 40-8324292, Fiche No. OTS0509403 ]**QC REVIEWED**

The effects of trichloroethylene were examined in the rat hepatocyte primary culture DNA repair assay. Based on preliminary toxicity tests, trichloroethylene was tested at concentrations of 1, 0.1, 0.01, 0.001, 1x10(-4) and 1x10(-5)% in DMSO solvent vehicle. The higher two levels were too cytotoxic to be evaluated in the assay. The concentrations at 0.01% or lower were not cytotoxic and did not cause a significant increase in the unscheduled DNA synthesis over the solvent control.
[Naylor Dana Institute; DNA Repair Tests of 11 Chlorinated Hydrocarbon Analogs. (1983), EPA Document No. 40-8324292, Fiche No. OTS0509403 ]**QC REVIEWED**

The mutagenicity of trichloroethane was evaluated in Salmonella tester strains TA98, TA100, TA1535 and TA1537 (Ames Test), both in the presence and absence of added metabolic activation by Aroclor-induced rat liver S9 fraction. Trichloroethylene caused a positive response in strains TA100 and TA1535, both with and without added metabolic activation. Trichloroethylene did not cause a positive response in strains TA98 or TA1537 in any of the test. Trichloroethylene was evaluated using a protocol in which the test article was usually tested over a minimum of 6 dose levels, the highest nontoxic dose level being 10 mg/plate unless solubility, mutagenicity or toxicity dictated a lower limit.
[SRI International; Investigation of the Species Sensitivity and Mechanism of Carcinogenicity of Halogenated Hydrocarbons. (1984), EPA Document No. 40-8424225, Fiche No. OTS0509408 ]**QC REVIEWED**

The pharmacokinetics of 1,1,2-trichloroethylene (TRI) was evaluated in male B6C3F1 mice (4/exposure) and male Osborne-Mendel rats (4/exposure) receiving nominal concentrations of 14C-TRI at 10ppm or 600ppm for 6 hours in a dynamic airflow chamber. Mice and rats were placed in Roth-type metabolism cages for collection of feces, urine and expired air for 50 hours post exposure. Within 50 hours, 98-99% of the total radioactivity observed in all exposed male mice was metabolized. The primary route of elimination (approximately, 75% of total body burden) for all mice was via the urine. Approximately 9% of 14C-TRI body burden in mice was biotransformed to the 14C-carbon dioxide. No indication of saturation of 14C-TRI metabolites in the high dose mice was observed. In contrast, rats metabolism of 14C-TRI appeared to show characteristics of saturation at the high dose level. Total metabolism of 14C-TRI in rats at the high dose level (79% of absorbed dose) was decreased relative to the low dose rats (98% of the absorbed dose). Also, exhalation of 14C-TRI increased 10-fold with increased exposure in rats. The primary route of elimination of 14C-TRI in the rat was via the urine which accounted for approximately 62% and 55% of the 14C-TRI body burden in low and high doses, respectively. Mice metabolized 2.2 fold and 3.6 fold more TRI on a per kg body weight basis than rats at 10ppm and 600ppm, respectively.
[Dow Toxicology Research Laboratory; The Pharmacokinetics and Macromolecular Interactions of Trichloroethylene in Mice and Rats, Final Report, (1981), EPA Document No. FYI-AX-0781-0120, Fiche No. OTS0000120-0 ]**QC REVIEWED**

The ability of 1,1,2-trichloroethylene to alkylate hepatic DNA was evaluated in four male B6C3F1 mice receiving a carcinogenic dose (1200mg/kg) of 14C-TRI orally by gavage. Mice were sacrificed 5 hours post exposure, and liver were excised. 1,1,2-Trichloroethylene alkylated hepatic DNA in mice to a very small degree, with the maximum estimate average DNA alkylation of 0.62 (+/-0.42) alkylations/10(6) nucleotides for three mice and no 14C-associated bases were detected in the fourth mouse.
[Dow Toxicology Research Laboratory; The Pharmacokinetics and Macromolecular interactions of Trichloroethylene in Mice and Rats as Related to Oncogenicity, Final Report, (1981), EPA Document No. FYI-AX-0781-0120, Fiche No. OTS0000120-0 ]**QC REVIEWED**

The ability of trichloroethylene (TCE) to cause unscheduled DNA synthesis was evaluated in 3 sets of male B6C3F1 mice (10-12/group) exposed by gavage using 3 regimes: Set 1, 0 or 2400 mg/kg/day for 3 days; Set 2, 0 or 2400 mg/kg/day for 5 days/week for 3 weeks; and Set 3, 0 , 250, 500, 1200 or 2400 mg/kg/day for 5 days/week for 3 weeks. Mice were injected subcutaneously with radiolabelled thymidine, Set 1 daily, and Sets 2 and 3 on the last 5 and 4 days of TCE treatment, respectively. The animals were sacrificed upon termination of treatment and the kidneys (Set 1 only) and livers examined. There were statistically significant differences noted between treated and control mice in the following: Sets 1 and 2 (p < 0.01, Dunnett's or Student's t-test), increased liver/body weight ratio and hepatic DNA synthesis, and decreased ug DNA/g tissue; Set 3, dose-related increase in liver/body weight ratio (500 mg/kg/day and above, p < 0.01), and a dose-related decrease in hepatic DNA synthesis (500 mg/kg/day and above, p < 0.01). No significant differences were observed between the kidneys of treated and control mice of Set 2. Histopathological changes in hepatic tissue were observed in all treated animals (dose-related in Set 3 animals). Five mice treated with 1200 mg radiolabelled TCE/kg by gavage and sacrificed 3 hrs later indicated that TCE alkylated hepatic DNA only to a small degree.
[Dow Chemical USA; The Pharmacokinetics and Macromolecular Interactions of Trichloroethylene in Mice and Rats as Related to Oncogenicity. (1981), EPA Document No. FYI-AX-0781-0120, Fiche No. OTS0000120-0 ]**QC REVIEWED**

The ability of trichloroethylene (TCE) to cause unscheduled DNA synthesis was evaluated in 2 sets of male Osborne-Mendel rats (4/group) exposed by gavage using 2 regimes: Set 1, 0 or 1100 mg/kg/day for 3 days, and Set 2, 0 or 1100 mg/kg/day for 5 days/week for 3 weeks. The rats were injected subcutaneously with radiolabelled thymidine, Set 1 daily, and Set 2 on the last 5 days of TCE treatment. The animals were sacrificed upon termination of treatment and the kidneys (Set 1 only) and livers examined. There were statistically significant differences noted between treated and control rats in the following: Set 2 (p < 0.01, Dunnett's or Student's t-test), increased liver/body weight ratio and hepatic DNA synthesis. No significant differences were observed between the kidneys of treated and control rats of Set 2 or the livers of treated and control rats of Set 1. No significant histopathological changes in hepatic tissue were observed in any of the groups of animals.
[Dow Chemical USA; The Pharmacokinetics and Macromolecular Interactions of Trichloroethylene in Mice and Rats as Related to Oncogenicity. (1981), EPA Document No. FYI-AX-0781-0120, Fiche No. OTS0000120-0 ]**QC REVIEWED**

The macromolecular binding of 1,1,2-trichloroethylene (TRI) was evaluated in male B6C3F1 mice (12/exposure) and male Osborne-Mendel rats (12/exposure) receiving nominal concentrations of 14C-TRI at 10ppm or 600ppm for 6 hours in a dynamic air flow chamber. Four rats and four mice were sacrificed at 0, 6 and 24 hours post exposure, and liver and kidneys were excised. Additional mice and rats were sacrificed at 50 hour post exposure from a previous study under the same conditions. The mice had greater binding of radiolabel from TRI than the rat after exposure to 10 or 600ppm of 14C-TRI. Macromolecular binding as measured by pmole Eq C14-TRI per ug protein was three to four times greater in both hepatic and renal tissue in mice following 600ppm exposure than rats. Only a modest increase was observed in hepatic tissue of the mouse following 10ppm exposure relative to the rat. Maximum binding in the liver for both species was observed immediately following exposure (3 hours for the kidneys) and decreased steadily over the next 48 hours.
[Dow Toxicology Research Laboratory; The Pharmacokinetics and Macromolecular Interactions of Trichloroethylene in Mice and Rats, Final Report, (1981), EPA Document No. FYI-AX-0781-0120, Fiche No. OTS0000120-0 ]**QC REVIEWED**

Metabolism/Pharmacokinetics:

Metabolism/Metabolites:

RATS EXCRETE 5-7 TIMES MORE TRICHLOROETHANOL THAN TRICHLOROACETIC ACID AFTER EXPOSURE TO TRICHLOROETHYLENE.
[National Research Council. Drinking Water & Health Volume 1. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1977.777]**PEER REVIEWED**

EXCRETION OF METABOLITES HAS BEEN STATED TO AMT TO 56% OF TRICHLOROETHYLENE INHALED-7-27% TRICHLOROACETIC ACID, 22.2-22.5% TRICHLOROETHANOL, FREE OR CONJUGATED, 22.5-45.5% UROCHLORALIC ACID AND SMALL AMT ... OF MONOCHLOROACETIC ACID AND CHLOROFORM. ...
[Browning, E. Toxicity and Metabolism of Industrial Solvents. New York: American Elsevier, 1965.194]**PEER REVIEWED**

METAB OF TCE PROCEEDED THROUGH FORMATION OF A COMPLEX WITH OXYGENATED CYTOCHROME P450 WHICH, BY REARRANGEMENT, CAN LEAD TO: (A) SUICIDAL HEME DESTRUCTION; (B) FORMATION OF CHLORAL, WHICH COULD BE REDUCED TO TRICHLOROETHANOL AND CONJUGATED TO FORM A GLUCURONIDE OR OXIDIZED TO TRICHLOROACETIC ACID; (C) FORMATION OF TCE OXIDE, WHICH DECOMP TO CO AND GLYOXYLIC ACID; AND (D) METABOLITES WHICH BIND IRREVERSIBLY TO PROTEIN, DNA, AND RNA.
[MILLER RE, GUENGERICH FP; CANCER RES 43 (3): 1145-52 (1983)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Hepatic microsomes from rats fed for 3 weeks on an isocaloric diet deficient in carbohydrate (sucrose) had an increased capacity (2-1/2-fold) to metabolize trichloroethylene.
[Nakajima T et al; Biochem Pharmacol 31: 1005-11 (1982) as cited in USPEA; Health Assessment Document: Trichloroethylene (Draft) p.4-39 (1983) EPA-600/8-82-006B]**PEER REVIEWED**

IN VITRO ADDITION OF TCE TO INCUBATION MIXTURE DECR METAB OF ETHYLMORPHINE & HEXOBARBITAL BY HEPATIC MICROSOMES IN RATS. INHIBITION OF HEXOBARBITAL METAB WAS COMPETITIVE. REPEATED ADMIN TO RATS DECR MICROSOMAL CYTOCHROME P450; INCR LIVER/BODY WT RATIO, MICROSOMAL PROTEINS, NADPH-CYTOCHROME C REDUCTASE ACTIVITY, ANILINE HYDROXYLASE ACTIVITY.
[PESSAYRE D ET AL; TOXICOL APPL PHARMACOL 49 (2): 355-64 (1979)]**PEER REVIEWED**

The metabolism of TCE in rats involves oxidation by the liver /SRP: post-mitochondrial supernatant/ mixed function oxidase system to an epoxide intermediate, which binds covalantly to proteins and causes centrilobular damage in the liver. ...
[Gosselin, R.E., R.P. Smith, H.C. Hodge. Clinical Toxicology of Commercial Products. 5th ed. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1984.II-165]**PEER REVIEWED**

Rats and mice metabolize trichloroethylene in a qualitatively similar fashion; however, the greater rate of metabolism in mice resulted in (a) a 4-fold greater burden of metabolized trichloroethylene per kilogram of body weight (600 ppm/hr and 2000 mg/kg oral dose) and (b) 4- and 7-fold higher blood concentrations of trichloroethanol and trichloroacetic acid in mice versus rats (1000 mg/kg oral dose), respectively. Humans metabolize trichloroethylene to trichloroethanol and trichloroacetic acid, but more slowly than either mice or rats, which is thought to have important implications with respect to the greater sensitivity of the mouse to toxic effects of trichloroethylene. Trichloroethylene is metabolized by the cytochrome p450 mixed-function oxidase system to chloral (trichloroacetaldehyde), which is subsequently oxidized to trichloroacetic acid or reduced to trichloroethanol (free and conjugated).
[Hayes, W.J., Jr., E.R. Laws, Jr., (eds.). Handbook of Pesticide Toxicology. Volume 2. Classes of Pesticides. New York, NY: Academic Press, Inc., 1991.691]**PEER REVIEWED**

Trichloroethylene is converted to trichloroethanol, free and conjugated with glucuronic acid. The initial conversion of the solvent is to chloral hydrate. Trichloroacetic and the monochloroacetic acid and trichloroethanol are found in the urine. Urinary metabolites can be used for assessment of exposure.
[Zenz, C., O.B. Dickerson, E.P. Horvath. Occupational Medicine. 3rd ed. St. Louis, MO., 1994721]**PEER REVIEWED**

The toxicity & metab of trichloroethylene (TRI) were studied in renal proximal tubular (PT) & distal tubular (DT) cells from male Fischer 344 rats. TRI was slightly toxic to both PT and DT cells, & inhibition of cytochrome P450 (P450; substrate, reduced-flavoprotein:oxygen oxidoreductase (RH-hydroxylating or -epoxidizing); EC 1.14.14.1) increased TRI toxicity only in DT cells. In untreated cells, glutathione (GSH) conjugation of TRI to form S-(1,2-dichlorovinyl)glutathione (DCVG) was detected only in PT cells. Inhibition of P450 transiently increased DCVG formation in PT cells & resulted in detection of DCVG formation in DT cells. Formation of DCVG in PT cells was described by a two-component model (apparent Vmax values of 0.65 & 0.47 nmol/min per mg protein & Km values of 2.91 & 0.46 mM). Cytosol isolated from rat renal cortical, PT, & DT cells expressed high levels of GSH S-transferase (GST; RX:glutathione R-transferase; EC 2.5.1.18) alpha (GSTalpha) but not GSTpi. Low levels of GSTmu were detected in cortical & DT cells. Purified rat GSTalpha2-2 exhibited markedly higher affinity for TRI than did GSTalpha1-1 or GSTalpha1-2, but each isoform exhibited similar Vmax values. Triethyltinbromide (TETB) (9 muM) inhibited DCVG formation by purified GSTalpha1-1 & GSTalpha2-2, but not GSTalpha1-2. Bromosulfophthalein (BSP) (4 muM) only inhibited DCVG formation by GSTalpha2-2. TETB & BSP inhibited approximately 90% of DCVG formation in PT cytosol but had no effect in DT cytosol. This suggests that GSTalpha1-1 is the primary isoform in rat renal PT cells responsible for GSH conjugation of TRI. These data ... describe the metab of TRI by individual GST isoforms & suggest that DCVG feedback inhibits TRI metab by GSTs.
[Cummings BS et al; Biochemical Pharmacology 59 (5): 531-543 (2000)]**PEER REVIEWED**

A major focus in the study of metab & disposition of trichloroethylene (TCE) is to identify metabolites that can be used reliably to assess flux through the various pathways of TCE metab & to identify those metabolites that are causally associated with toxic responses. ... Sex- & species-dependent differences in biotransformation pathways ... can play an important role in the utility of laboratory animal data for understanding the pharmacokinetics & pharmacodynamics of TCE in humans. Sex-, species-, & strain-dependent differences in absorption & distribution of TCE may play some role in explaining differences in metab & susceptibility to toxicity from TCE exposure. The majority of differences in susceptibility, however, are likely due to sex-, species-, & strain-dependent differences in activities of the various enzymes that can metabolize TCE & its subsequent metabolites. An addtl factor that plays a role in human health risk assessment for TCE is the high degree of variability in the activity of certain enzymes. TCE undergoes metab by two major pathways, cytochrome P450 (P450)-dependent oxidation & conjugation with glutathione (GSH). Key P450-derived metabolites of TCE that have been associated with specific target organs, such as the liver & lungs, include chloral hydrate, trichloroacetate, & dichloroacetate. Metabolites derived from the GSH conjugate of TCE, in contrast, have been associated with the kidney as a target organ. Specifically, metab of the cysteine conjugate of TCE by the cysteine conjugate beta-lyase generates a reactive metabolite that is nephrotoxic & may be nephrocarcinogenic. Although the P450 pathway is a higher activity & higher affinity pathway than the GSH conjugation pathway, one should not automatically conclude that the latter pathway is only important at very high doses.
[Lash LH et al; Environmental Health Perspectives 108 (2): 177-200 (2000)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Metabolites of toluene (hippuric acid) & trichloroethylene (total trichloro cmpds) have been estimated in labotratory rats after microsomal induction by phenobarbital. Phenobarbital pretreatment accelerated the removal of total trichloro cmpds, however, excretion of hippuric acid was moderately diminished. Results on cytochrome P450 suggest that microsomal induction by phenobarbital was higher in trichloroethylene treated rats than toluene treated rats. It is concluded that in addition to distinct substrate specificity of CYP450 isozymes several other factors like Vmax/Km & QH determine the metab of organic solvents.
[RANA S VS; GUPTA S; JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL BIOLOGY 21 (2): 105-109 (2000)]**PEER REVIEWED**

A ... study investigated the possible differences in metabolism and pharmacokinetics between mice and rats exposed to trichloroethylene. A comparison of metabolized trichloroethylene on a wt basis indicates that the mouse metabolizes 2.2 times more than the rat at 10 ppm and 3.6 times at 600 ppm. Hepatic macromolecular binding was greater in the mouse than in the rat. The binding data suggest that tumor formation in the mouse exposed to trichloroethylene occurred via a nongenetic mechanism and tumors are not expected if liver injury does not occur.
[American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices. 5th ed. Cincinnati, OH: American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 1986.596]**PEER REVIEWED**

Absorption, Distribution & Excretion:

... It can penetrate intact human skin.
[Gosselin, R.E., R.P. Smith, H.C. Hodge. Clinical Toxicology of Commercial Products. 5th ed. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1984.II-165]**PEER REVIEWED**

PLACENTAL TRANSMISSION DATA: TIME TO APPEAR IN FETUS--2 MIN; TIME TO FETAL/MATERNAL CONCN EQUILIBRIUM--6 MIN; FETAL/MATERNAL CONCENTRATION RATIO--1.0 /FROM TABLE/
[LaDu, B.N., H.G. Mandel, and E.L. Way. Fundamentals of Drug Metabolism and Disposition. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1971.100]**PEER REVIEWED**

... A DAILY EXPOSURE LEVEL OF APPROXIMATELY 100 PPM, ONLY ONE-THIRD OF THE RETAINED TRICHLOROETHYLENE (CALCULATED) IS EXCRETED AS METABOLITES IN THE URINE DURING THE WORK DAY.
[Doull, J., C.D. Klaassen, and M. D. Amdur (eds.). Casarett and Doull's Toxicology. 2nd ed. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., 1980.475]**PEER REVIEWED**

BINDING OF TCE TO LIVER MICROSOMAL PROTEINS OF MALE B6C3 HYBRID MICE WAS 46% HIGHER THAN /BINDING OF/ (14)C-TCE TO MICROSOMAL PROTEINS FROM MALE OSBORNE-MENDEL RATS.
[BANERJEE S ET AL; CANCER RES 38 (3): 776-80 (1978)]**PEER REVIEWED**

10 VOLUNTEER STUDENTS WERE EXPOSED TO 250-380 PPM OF TRICHLOROETHYLENE FOR 160 MIN. RETENTION AMOUNTED TO 36%. 16% OF THE RETAINED AMT WAS ELIMINATED THROUGH RESPIRATION AFTER EXPOSURE. TRICHLOROACETIC ACID EXCRETION IN FEMALES WAS 2-3 TIMES MORE THAN THAT IN MALES FOR THE 1ST 24 HR AFTER EXPOSURE. TWICE AS MUCH TRICHLOROETHANOL WAS EXCRETED IN MALES THAN IN FEMALES FOR THE 1ST 12 HR. THESE FINDINGS SUGGEST A SEX DIFFERENCE IN HUMAN METABOLISM OF TRICHLOROETHYLENE.
[NOMIYAMA K, NOMIYAMA H; INT ARCH ARBEITSMED 28 (1): 37-48 (1971)]**PEER REVIEWED**

The blood concn of trichloroethylene during inhalation and elimination /in humans/ closely parallels alveolar gas concn. Trichloroethylene most rapidly attains equilibrium by passive diffusion into the vessel rich group of tissues (VRG) (brain, heart, kidneys, liver, endocrine and digestive systems), more slowly with lean mass (MG) (muscle and skin) and lastly with adipose tissue (FG). As determined from elimination kinetics following exposure, trichloroethylene distributes from blood into these 3 major compartments at approx rate constants of VRG: 17 hr(-1) (half-life, 2.4 min), MG: 1.7 hr(-1) (t/2, 25 min) and FG: 0.2 hr(-1) (half-life, 3.5 hr). While MG is 50% of the body vol versus 20% for FG, saturation and desaturation proceeds more rapidly from the MG compartment than the FG compartment because of the considerably greater solubility of trichloroethylene in lipids. Thus, variations in trichloroethylene uptake between individuals is influenced first by lean body mass and second by adipose tissue mass.
[USEPA; Health Assessment Document: Trichloroethylene (Draft) p.4-5 (1983) EPA-600/8-82-006B]**PEER REVIEWED**

Careful balance studies using GC methodology show, that after single or repeated daily exposures to trichloroethylene concentrations between 50 and 380 ppm, an average of 11% of /absorbed/ trichloroethylene is eliminated unchanged by the lung (half-life= 5 hr), 2% of the dose is eliminated as trichloroethanol by the lung (half-life 10 to 12 hr) and 58% is eliminated as urinary metabolites. The remaining 30% of the dose has been postulated to be metabolized by additional pathways or routes of elimination of one or more unknown metabolites.
[USEPA; Health Assessment Document: Trichloroethylene (Draft) p.4-22 (1983) EPA-600/8-82-006B]**PEER REVIEWED**

The ratio between trichloroethylene exposure and urinary trichloroacetic acid excretion appears to decrease with age.
[Grandjean E et al; Br J Ind Med 12: 131 (1955) as cited in USEPA; Ambient Water Quality Criteria Document: Trichloroethylene p.C-10 (1980) EPA 440/5/80-007]**PEER REVIEWED**

Pure trichloroethylene is absorbed through mouse abdominal skin at a rate of 55 nmol/sq cm/min.
[Tsuruta H; Ind Health 16: 145-8 (1978) as cited in Health and Safety Executive Monograph: Trichloroethylene #6 p.3 (1982)]**PEER REVIEWED**

When (14)C-trichloroethylene was administered by im injection at a dose of 50 mg/kg, the radioactivity excreted in the urine and feces ranged from 40-60% of the dose in chimpanzees, 11-28% in baboons, and 7-40% in rhesus monkeys.
[Muller WF et al; Chemosphere 11: 215-8 (1982) as cited in USEPA; Health Assessment Document: Trichloroethylene (Draft) p.4-23 (1983) EPA-600/8-82-006B]**PEER REVIEWED**

When 18 mg/kg of trichloroethylene in 5 ml of water or corn oil was intragastrically administered to fasting rats (400 g), the peak blood concn (5.6 minutes for aqueous solution) averaged 15 times higher for water than for corn oil solution (14.7 vs <1.0 ug/ml). The peak blood concn was reached faster for water than for oil solution, which exhibited a second delayed peak 80 minutes post-absorption.
[Withey JR et al; J Appl Toxicol 3 (5): 249-53 (1983) as cited in USEPA; Health Assessment Document: Trichloroethylene (Draft) p.4-2 (1983) EPA-600/8-82-006B]**PEER REVIEWED**

In humans, the blood/air partition coefficient ranges from 9 to 15. Daily body uptake has been estimated to be approximately 6 mg/kg body weight, for an exposure of 4 hr at 378 mg/cu m and /is not influenced/ by the quantity of adipose tissue.
[Monster AC et al; Int Arch Occup Environ Health 42: 283-92 (1979) as cited in WHO; Environ Health Criteria: Trichloroethylene p.42 (1985)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Trichloroethylene retention varies according to physical activity. Under laboratory conditions, human volunteers at rest exposed to concentrations of 540 or 1080 mg/cu m for 30 minutes, 50% of the quantity inhaled was retained. The percentage retained decreased from 50% to 25% when activity rose from rest to a 150 watt workload, but, because of increased ventilation, the absolute amount absorbed still increased.
[Astrand I, Ovrum P; Scand J Work Environ Health 2: 199-211 (1976) as cited in WHO; Environ Health Criteria: Trichloroethylene p.42 (1985)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Trichlororethylene is expired from the lungs for 2 days after exposure, & traces may be present on the 3rd day. About 8% of the retained material is excreted as metabolites in the feces, but most is excreted in the urine. /It was/ found that an average of 73% of the trichloroethylene retained by men & women after inhalation could be recovered in the urine as follows: monochloroacetic acid, 4%; trichloroacetic acid, 19%; & trichloroethanol, 50%. In humans, excretion of the metabolites of trichloroethylene is fastest for monochloroacetic acid, intermediate for trichloroethanol, & slowest for trichloroacetic acid. Following the use of trichloroethylene as an anesthetic, trichloroacetic acid may be detected in the urine for 5-12 days. Following accidental ingestion of trichloroethylene, trichloroacetic acid was found in the serum & urine for 27 days.
[Hayes, W.J., Jr., E.R. Laws Jr., (eds.). Handbook of Pesticide Toxicology Volume 1. General Principles. New York, NY: Academic Press, Inc., 1991.155]**PEER REVIEWED**

Trichloroethylene & its metabolites appear to cross the placenta readily in many species. In mice, inhalation of trichloroethylene resulted in accumulation of its metabolite, trichloroacetic acid, in amniotic fluid.
[IARC. Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Man. Geneva: World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1972-PRESENT. (Multivolume work).V63 121 (1995)]**PEER REVIEWED**

A physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was developed that provides a comprehensive description of the kinetics of trichloroethylene (TCE) & its metabolites, trichloroethanol (TCOH), trichloroacetic acid (TCA), & dichloroacetic acid (DCA), in the mouse, rat, & human for both oral & inhalation exposure. The model includes descriptions of the three principal target tissues for cancer identified in animal bioassays: liver, lung, & kidney. Cancer dose metrics provided in the model include the area under the concn curve (AUC) for TCA & DCA in the plasma, the peak concn & AUC for chloral in the tracheobronchial region of the lung, & the production of a thioacetylating intermediate from dichlorovinylcysteine in the kidney. Addtl dose metrics provided for noncancer risk assessment include the peak concns & AUCs for TCE & TCOH in the blood, as well as the total metab of TCE divided by the body weight. Sensitivity & uncertainty analyses were performed on the model to evaluate its suitability for use in a pharmacokinetic risk assessment for TCE. Model predictions of TCE, TCA, DCA, & TCOH concns in rodents & humans are in good agreement with a variety of experimental data, suggesting that the model should provide a useful basis for evaluating cross-species differences in pharmacokinetics for these chemicals. In the case of the lung & kidney target tissues, however, only limited data are available for establishing cross-species pharmacokinetics. As a result, PBPK model calculations of target tissue dose for lung & kidney should be used with caution.
[Clewell HJ 3rd et al; Environ Health Perspect 108 (2): 283-305 (2000)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Trichloroethylene (TCE) pharmacokinetics have been studied in experimental animals & humans for over 30 yr. Compartmental & physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models have been developed for the uptake, distribution, & metab of TCE & the production, distribution, metab, & elimination of P450-mediated metabolites of TCE. TCE is readily taken up into systemic circulation by oral & inhalation routes of exposure & is rapidly metabolized by the hepatic P450 system and to a much lesser degree, by direct conjugation with glutathione. Recent PBPK models for TCE & its metabolites have focused on the major metabolic pathway for metab of TCE (P450-mediated metabolic pathway). This article briefly reviews selected published compartmental & PBPK models for TCE. Trichloroacetic acid (TCA) is considered a principal metabolite responsible for TCE-induced live r cancer in mice. Liver cancer in mice was considered a critical effect by the U.S. EPA for deriving the current maximum contaminant level for TCE in water. In the literature both whole blood & plasma measurements of TCA are reported in mice & humans. To reduce confusion about disparately measured & model-predicted levels of TCA in plasma & whole blood, model-predicted outcomes are compared for first-generation (plasma) & second-generation (whole blood) PBPK models published by Fisher & colleagues. Qualitatively, animals & humans metabolize TCE in a similar fashion, producing the same metabolites. Quantitatively, PBPK models for TCE & its metabolites are important tools for providing dosimetry comparisons between experimental animals & humans. TCE PBPK models can be used today to aid in crafting scientifically sound public health decisions for TCE.
[Fisher JW; Environmental Health Perspectives 108 (2): 265-273 (2000)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Trichloroethylene (TCE) ... is oxidized by high-affinity, low-capacity cytochrome P450 isozymes & subsequently converted to metabolites, some of which are carcinogenic in mice & rats. Although the initial oxidation step is known to be rate-limiting & saturable, the oral dosage-range over which saturation materializes is unclear. One objective of this study was to characterize the dose-dependency of GI absorption of TCE & its kinetics over a wide range of oral bolus doses. A related objective was to investigate cause(s) of the apparent saturation kinetics observed. ... /TCE was/ given in doses of 2 to 1200 mg/kg bw via the stomach tube. ... The rate of GI absorption of TCE diminished as the dosage increased. Pharmacokinetic analysis indicated that TCE was eliminated by capacity-limited hepatic metab, with incursion into nonlinear kinetics with bolus doses :8 to 16 mg/kg. Effects of p-nitrophenol, a competitive metabolic inhibitor, were manifest at a high, but not at a low TCE dose. Gavage bolus doses as high as 1200 mg/kg did not cause rapid elevation of serum enzyme levels, typical of the solvation of hepatocellular membranes observed after portal vein admin of TCE ... . No evidence of cytochrome P4502E1 (CYP2E1) destruction was seen with oral doses up to 1000 mg/kg. Instead, CYP2E1 activity was induced as early as 1 h postdosing. Induction was maximal at 12 hr, then returned toward controls during the next 12 h. Pretreatment with cycloheximide did not reduce CYP2E1 activity in rats given 432 or 1000 mg TCE/kg, suggesting that binding of TCE to CYP2E1 may stabilize the isozyme. Metabolic saturation, in concert with relatively slow GI absorption, are responsible for the prolonged elevation of blood TCE levels in rats given high TCE doses, while suicidal inactivation of CYP2E1 & hepatocellular injury apparently play little role.
[Lee KM et al; Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 164 (1): 55-64 (2000)]**PEER REVIEWED**

... To assess the dermal bioavailability of trichloroethylene (TCE), exhaled breath was monitored ... using an ion trap mass spectrometer (MS/MS) to track the uptake & elimination of TCE from dermal exposures in rats & humans. A physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was used to estimate total bioavailability. Male F344 rats were exposed to TCE in water or soil under occluded or nonoccluded conditions by applying a patch to a clipper-shaved area of the back. Rats were placed in off-gassing chambers & chamber air TCE concn was quantified for 3-5 h post-dosing using the MS/MS. Human volunteers were exposed either by whole-hand immersion or by attaching patches containing TCE in soil or water on each forearm. Volunteers were provided breathing air via a face mask to eliminate inhalation exposure, & exhaled breath was analyzed using the MS/MS. The total TCE absorbed & the dermal permeability coefficient (KP) were estimated for each individual by optimization of the PBPK model to the exhaled breath data & the changing media &/or dermal patch concns. Rat skin was significantly more permeable than human skin. Estimates for KP in a water matrix were 0.31 : 0.01 cm/h & 0.015 : 0.003 cm/hr in rats & humans, respectively. KP estimates were more than three times higher from water than soil matrices in both species. KP values calculated using the standard Fick's Law equation were strongly affected by exposure length & volatilization of TCE. In comparison, KP values estimated using noninvasive real-time breath analysis coupled with the PBPK model were consistent, regardless of volatilization, exposure concentration, or duration.
[Poet TS et al; Toxicological Sciences 56 (1): 61-72 (2000)]**PEER REVIEWED**

In lifetime bioassays, trichloroethylene (TCE, CAS No. 79-01-6) causes liver tumors in mice following gavage, liver & lung tumors in mice following inhalation, & kidney tumors in rats following gavage or inhalation. Recently developed pharmacokinetic models provide estimates of internal, target-organ doses of the TCE metabolites thought responsible for these tumor responses. Dose-response analyses following recently proposed methods for carcinogen risk assessment from the U.S. EPA are conducted on the animal tumor data using the pharmacokinetic dosimeters to derive a series of alternative projections of the potential carcinogenic potency of TCE in humans exposed to low environmental concns. Although mechanistic considerations suggest action of possibly nonlinear processes, dose-response shapes in the observable range of tumor incidence evince little sign of such patterns. Results depend on which of several alternative pharmacokinetic analyses are used to define target-organ doses. Human potency projections under the U.S. EPA linear method based on mouse liver tumors & internal dosimetry equal or somewhat exceed calculations based on admin dose, & projections based on mouse liver tumors exceed those from mouse lung or rat kidney tumors. Estimates of the carcinogenic potency of the two primary oxidative metabolites of TCE--trichloroacetic acid & dichloroacetic acid, which are mouse liver carcinogens in their own right--are also made, but it is not clear whether the carcinogenic potency of TCE can be quantitatively ascribed to metabolic generation of these metabolites.
[Rhomberg LR; Environ Health Perspect 108 (2): 343-358 (2000)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Regulatory agencies are challenged to conduct risk assessments on chemical mixtures without full information on toxicological interactions that may occur at real-world, low-dose exposure levels. The present study was undertaken to investigate the pharmacokinetic impact of low-dose coexposures to toluene & trichloroethylene in vivo in male F344 rats using a real-time breath analysis system coupled with physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling. Rats were exposed to compounds alone or as a binary mixture, at low (5 to 25 mg/kg) or high (240 to 800 mg/kg) dose levels. Exhaled breath from the exposed animals was monitored for the parent cmpds & a PBPK model was used to analyze the data. At low doses, exhaled breath kinetics from the binary mixture exposure compared with those obtained during single exposures, thus indicating that no metabolic interaction occurred with the se low doses. In contract, at higher doses the binary PBPK model simulating independent metab was found to under predict the exhaled breath concn, suggesting an inhibition of metab. Therefore the binary mixture PBPK model was used to compare the measured exhaled breath levels from high- & low-dose exposures with the predicted levels under various metabolic interaction simulations (competitive, noncompetitive, or uncompetitive inhibition). Of these simulations, the optimized competitive metabolic interaction description yielded a Ki value closest to the Km of the inhibitor solvent, indicating that competitive inhibition is the most plausible type of metabolic interaction between these two solvents.
[Thrall KD; Poet TS; J of Toxicology and Environmental Health Part A 59 (8): 653-670 (2000)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Biological Half-Life:

THE BIOL HALF-LIVES OF THE URINARY METABOLITES OF HUMANS OCCUPATIONALLY EXPOSED TO TRICHLOROETHYLENE WAS APPROX 41 HR.
[IKEDA M, IMAMURA T; INT ARCH ARBEITSMED 31 (3): 209-24 (1973)]**PEER REVIEWED**

The half-life of trichloroethylene in exhaled air & in the blood depends on the length of exposure & on the time of sampling after exposure. ... Maximum concn /of trichloroethanol/ in blood & urine /is reached/ almost directly after exposure. ... concn decr with a half-life of about 10-15 hr. ... Concn of trichloroacetic acid in both the blood & urine incr for up to 20-40 hr after /a single/ exposure. ... concn decr with a half-life of about 70-100 hr.
[WHO; Environ Health Criteria 50: Trichloroethylene p.48 (1985)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Mechanism of Action:

TCE WAS INCUBATED WITH RAT LIVER MICROSOME, NADPH AND RNA (FROM YEAST). THE METABOLITES WERE IRREVERSIBLY BOUND TO MICROSOMAL PROTEINS. HYDROLYSIS OF RNA & SEPARATION OF NUCLEOSIDES SHOWED DIFFERENT ALKYLATION PRODUCTS ARISING FROM TCE & VINYL CHLORIDE. ... NEWBORN RATS WERE EXPOSED FOR 10 WEEKS TO 2000 PPM VINYL CHLORIDE OR TRICHLOROETHYLENE (8H/DAY; 5 DAYS/WEEK). AFTER THIS PERIOD LIVERS OF THE ANIMALS WERE STAINED FOR NUCLEOSIDE-5-TRIPHOSPHATASE. WHEREAS THE VINYL CHLORIDE EXPOSED RATS SHOWED FOCAL HEPATOCELLULAR DEFICIENCIES IN THIS ENZYME, WHICH ARE SUPPOSED TO REPRESENT AN EARLY SIGN OF MALIGNANCY, NO SUCH CHANGES WERE INDUCED BY TRICHLOROETHYLENE EXPOSURE.
[LAIB RJ ET AL; J CANCER RES CLIN ONCOL 94 (2): 139-47 (1979)]**PEER REVIEWED**

BINDING CONSTANTS (KS) FOR INTERACTION WITH RAT LIVER MICROSOMAL P450 FOR ITS METAB TO CHLORAL HYDRATE WERE NOT ALTERED BY INDUCTION WITH PHENOBARBITAL, 3-METHYLCHOLANTHRENE OR SPIRONOLACTONE. TCE APPEARED TO BE ACTIVATED BY CYTOCHROME TO ACTIVELY ALTER HEME MOIETY OF THE CYTOCHROME P450.
[COSTA AK ET AL; BIOCHEM PHARMACOL 29 (3): 433-9 (1980)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Interactions:

DISULFIRAM IS SAID TO INHIBIT THE OXIDATION /OF TRICHLOROETHYLENE/ IN MAN TO THE MORE TOXIC TRICHLOROETHANOL (AND THENCE TO TRICHLOROACETIC ACID) ...
[Gosselin, R.E., H.C. Hodge, R.P. Smith, and M.N. Gleason. Clinical Toxicology of Commercial Products. 4th ed. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1976.II-112]**PEER REVIEWED**

IN VITRO, ADDITION OF TCE DECR METAB OF ETHYLMORPHINE & HEXOBARBITAL BY RAT HEPATIC MICROSOMES. IN VIVO, TCE INHIBITED HEXOBARBITAL METABOLISM IN RATS.
[PESSAYRE D ET AL; TOXICOL APPL PHARMACOL 49 (2): 355-64 (1979)]**PEER REVIEWED**

BIOCHEM & TOXICOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF COMBINED EXPOSURE TO 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE (500 PPM) & TCE (200 PPM) FOR 4 DAYS 6 HR DAILY CAUSED ACCUM OF 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE IN PERIRENAL FAT. FURTHER EXPOSURE ON DAY 5 CAUSED RAPID INCR IN VARIOUS ORGAN CONTENTS OF BOTH SOLVENTS WITH DEPRESSION OF BRAIN RNA.
[VAINIO H ET AL; XENOBIOTICA 8 (3): 191-6 (1978)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Rabbits were given 10 mg/kg doses of caffeine 30 minutes prior to exposure to 6000 ppm (32,280 mg/cu m) of trichloroethylene under dynamic airflow conditions. Epinephrine was infused until arrhythmias occurred after 7.5, 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes of exposure and 15 and 30 minutes post-exposure. An increase in epinephrine-induced arrhythmias in trichloroethylene-exposed rabbits was observed when the animals were treated with caffeine and challenged with doses of epinephrine as low as 0.5 ug/kg.
[White JF, Carlson GP; Fund Appl Toxicol 2: 125-9 (1982) as cited in USEPA; Health Assessment Document: Trichloroethylene (Draft) p.5-6 (1983) EPA-600/ 8-82-006B]**PEER REVIEWED**

Phenobarbital administration to rats or hamsters in vivo increases the oxidation of trichloroethylene. This results in an incr in the conversion of trichloroethylene to trichloroacetaldehyde.
[Ikeda M, Imamura T; Int Arch Arbeitsmed 31: 209 (1973) as cited in Ambient Water Quality Criteria Document: Trichloroethylene p.C-10 (1980) EPA 440-5/ 80-007]**PEER REVIEWED**

Compared to chloral hydrate alone, ingestion of ethanol 30 minutes after chloral hydrate resulted in higher and more prolonged concentrations of plasma trichloroethanol and in lower plasma trichloroacetic acid levels and in urinary trichloroethanol glucuronide. ...
[Sellers EM et al; Metab Clin Pharmacol Ther 13: 37-49 (1972) as cited in USEPA; Health Assessment Document: Trichloroethylene (Draft) p.4-37 (1983) EPA-600/8-82-006B]**PEER REVIEWED**

Disulfiram (1.35 mmol/kg) was administered perorally to rabbits 24 and 6 hr prior to a 1 hr exposure (6000 ppm 32,280 mg/cu m) of trichloroethylene. When challenged with 0.5-3.0 ug/kg epinephrine, disulfiram prevented epinephrine-induced arrhythmias.
[Fossa AA et al; Toxicol Appl Pharm 66: 109-17 (1982) as cited in USEPA; Health Assessment Document: Trichloroethylene (Draft) p.5-11 (1983) EPA-600/8-82-006B]**PEER REVIEWED**

Isopropanol and acetone ... cause enhanced hepatotoxicity with ... trichloroethylene.
[Amdur, M.O., J. Doull, C.D. Klaasen (eds). Casarett and Doull's Toxicology. 4th ed. New York, NY: Pergamon Press, 1991.348]**PEER REVIEWED**

Studies /conducted/ with rats /indicate/ that the effects of trichloroethylene were more pronounced in the animals that were fed a high carbohydrate diet than those on a high protein diet. /Concentration of trichloroethylene not specified/
[Kalashinikova VP et al; Vopr Pitan 6: 43-7 (1974) as cited in WHO; Environ Health Criteria 50: Trichloroethylene p.61 (1985)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Rats exposed to 37,000, 42,000, and 56,000 mg/cu m of trichloroethylene vapor for two hours exhibited elevated activities of serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase, glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase, and isocitrate dehydrogenase. Hepatotoxicity (indicated by the increased levels of these hepatic enzymes in the serum) was greatly enhanced by pretreatment with 3-methylcholanthrene.
[Carlson GP; Res Comm Chem Pathol Pharmacol 7: 637 (1974) as cited in USEPA; Ambient Water Quality Document: Trichloroethylene p.C-19 (1980) EPA-440/5/80-007]**PEER REVIEWED**

To elicit the "degreaser's flush," ethanol was administered to seven male volunteers who were repeatedly exposed to trichloroethylene (TCE) vapor. In six exposed subjects, transient vasodilatation of superficial skin vessels occured after the ingestion of small amounts of ethanol (<0.5 ml/kg body weight). The dermal response reached maximum intensity 30 minutes after its onset and then faded completely within 60 minutes. Two factors appear necessary before the dermal response can be elicited: (1) repeated exposures to TCE and (2) ingestion of alcohol.
[Stewart RD et al; Arch Environ Health 29: 1 (1974)]**PEER REVIEWED**

... The induction of the hepatic microsomal mixed-function oxidase system by drugs, taken for therapeutic reasons, or by exposure to certain environmental chemicals (e.g., phenobarbital, toluene, PCBs) can bring about an incr rate of trichloroethylene metabolism.
[WHO; Environ Health Criteria 50: Trichloroethylene p.46 (1985)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Elimination of trichloroacetic acid & trichloroethanol was studied in rats exposed to trichloroethylene alone, or in combination with xylene, at 4.5 mmol/cu m air for five consecutive days. Prior to each inhalation, the rats were pretreated per os with ethyl alcohol at 1366 mg/kg bw or 2732 mg/kg bw. Both xylene & ethanol given separately, dependent on the dose, decreased urine elimination of trichloroacetic acid & trichloroethanol by about 34% (1366 mg/kg) & 45% (2732 mg/kg), respectively. Under conditions of the combined ethanol/xylene exposure, the xenobiotics reduced the elimination of trichloroethylene & trichloroethanol by about 80% & 20% respectively.
[Orlowski J et al; Bromatologia I Chemia ToksykologicznaOKSYKOLOGICZNA 33 (1): 15-21 (2000)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Neonatal male B6C3F1 (CRL, MI) mice were injected ip at 15 days of age with either 2.5 or 10 ug/g body weight ethylnitrosourea (ENU) (26-33/group) or 2 ul/g body weight of 0.1M sodium acetate (32/group) as the solvent control. At 28 days of age, the mice were placed on drinking water containing 3 or 40 mg/l trichloroethylene and they were killed after 61 weeks exposure to trichloroethylene. Controls (22-23/group) were given 0, 2.5, or 10 ug/g body weight ethylnitrosourea + sodium chloride (2 g/l). Trichloroethylene resulted in a significant increase in liver weight (p< 0.001) when given at 40 mg/l to mice pretreated with 2.5 ug/g body weight of ethylnitrosourea. Trichloroethylene alone, however, did not increase the incidence of adenomas or hepatocellular carcinomas above control levels.
[Herren F et al; Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 90: 183-9 (1987)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Pharmacology:

Therapeutic Uses:

Anesthetics, Inhalation; Solvents
[National Library of Medicine's Medical Subject Headings online file (MeSH, 1999)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Trichloroethylene ... is no longer used /as anesthetic agent/.
[Gilman, A.G., L.S.Goodman, and A. Gilman. (eds.). Goodman and Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. 7th ed. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc., 1985.292]**PEER REVIEWED**

MEDICATION (VET): INHALATION ANESTHETIC
[Budavari, S. (ed.). The Merck Index - Encyclopedia of Chemicals, Drugs and Biologicals. Rahway, NJ: Merck and Co., Inc., 1989.1516]**PEER REVIEWED**

Dental anesthetic. /Former use in USA/
[WHO; Environ Health Criteria 50: Trichloroethylene p.31 (1985)]**PEER REVIEWED**

INHALATION ANALGESIC. /Former use in USA/
[Budavari, S. (ed.). The Merck Index - Encyclopedia of Chemicals, Drugs and Biologicals. Rahway, NJ: Merck and Co., Inc., 1989.1516]**PEER REVIEWED**

Drug Warnings:

TRICHLOROETHYLENE HAS BEEN REPORTED TO CAUSE CONVULSIONS IN CHILDREN; THEREFORE, IT SHOULD NOT BE USED IN PATIENTS WITH CONVULSIVE DISORDERS.
[Osol, A. (ed.). Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences. 16th ed. Easton, Pennsylvania: Mack Publishing Co., 1980.986]**PEER REVIEWED**

Patients exposed to trichloroethylene should be warned of the potential adverse effects of ethanol ingestion.
[Hansten, P.D. Drug Interactions. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger, 1979.219]**PEER REVIEWED**

Isopropanol and acetone ... cause enhanced hepatotoxicity with ... trichloroethylene.
[Amdur, M.O., J. Doull, C.D. Klaasen (eds). Casarett and Doull's Toxicology. 4th ed. New York, NY: Pergamon Press, 1991.348]**PEER REVIEWED**

...Its anesthetic action is weak. Its low volatility appears in part to be responsible for this effect. ... Apparatus that employs bubbling oxygen assists in accelarating the volatility of the anesthetic to increase its potency. Because of its inherent weakness as an anesthetic, induction of anesthesia is slow. Cardiac arrhythmias produced by the anesthetic are unfavorable. Trichloroethylene cannot be used in a closed circuit with soda lime because of formation of a toxic product.
[Booth, N.H., L.E. McDonald (eds.). Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 5th ed. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press, 1982.195]**PEER REVIEWED**

Relaxation of abdominal musculature is poor during trichloroethylene anesthesia.This effect is similar to other agents (eg, ketamine, alpha-chloralose) that do not induce Stage III anesthesia. Trichloroethylene is considered unsatisfactory for this type of surgery unless it is used in conjunction with a skeletal muscle relaxant. It has very little if any effect upon uterine function. It readly crosses the placenta to reach the fetal circulation of sheep, goats, and probably other species.
[Booth, N.H., L.E. McDonald (eds.). Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 5th ed. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press, 1982.195]**PEER REVIEWED**

Interactions:

DISULFIRAM IS SAID TO INHIBIT THE OXIDATION /OF TRICHLOROETHYLENE/ IN MAN TO THE MORE TOXIC TRICHLOROETHANOL (AND THENCE TO TRICHLOROACETIC ACID) ...
[Gosselin, R.E., H.C. Hodge, R.P. Smith, and M.N. Gleason. Clinical Toxicology of Commercial Products. 4th ed. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1976.II-112]**PEER REVIEWED**

IN VITRO, ADDITION OF TCE DECR METAB OF ETHYLMORPHINE & HEXOBARBITAL BY RAT HEPATIC MICROSOMES. IN VIVO, TCE INHIBITED HEXOBARBITAL METABOLISM IN RATS.
[PESSAYRE D ET AL; TOXICOL APPL PHARMACOL 49 (2): 355-64 (1979)]**PEER REVIEWED**

BIOCHEM & TOXICOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF COMBINED EXPOSURE TO 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE (500 PPM) & TCE (200 PPM) FOR 4 DAYS 6 HR DAILY CAUSED ACCUM OF 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE IN PERIRENAL FAT. FURTHER EXPOSURE ON DAY 5 CAUSED RAPID INCR IN VARIOUS ORGAN CONTENTS OF BOTH SOLVENTS WITH DEPRESSION OF BRAIN RNA.
[VAINIO H ET AL; XENOBIOTICA 8 (3): 191-6 (1978)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Rabbits were given 10 mg/kg doses of caffeine 30 minutes prior to exposure to 6000 ppm (32,280 mg/cu m) of trichloroethylene under dynamic airflow conditions. Epinephrine was infused until arrhythmias occurred after 7.5, 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes of exposure and 15 and 30 minutes post-exposure. An increase in epinephrine-induced arrhythmias in trichloroethylene-exposed rabbits was observed when the animals were treated with caffeine and challenged with doses of epinephrine as low as 0.5 ug/kg.
[White JF, Carlson GP; Fund Appl Toxicol 2: 125-9 (1982) as cited in USEPA; Health Assessment Document: Trichloroethylene (Draft) p.5-6 (1983) EPA-600/ 8-82-006B]**PEER REVIEWED**

Phenobarbital administration to rats or hamsters in vivo increases the oxidation of trichloroethylene. This results in an incr in the conversion of trichloroethylene to trichloroacetaldehyde.
[Ikeda M, Imamura T; Int Arch Arbeitsmed 31: 209 (1973) as cited in Ambient Water Quality Criteria Document: Trichloroethylene p.C-10 (1980) EPA 440-5/ 80-007]**PEER REVIEWED**

Compared to chloral hydrate alone, ingestion of ethanol 30 minutes after chloral hydrate resulted in higher and more prolonged concentrations of plasma trichloroethanol and in lower plasma trichloroacetic acid levels and in urinary trichloroethanol glucuronide. ...
[Sellers EM et al; Metab Clin Pharmacol Ther 13: 37-49 (1972) as cited in USEPA; Health Assessment Document: Trichloroethylene (Draft) p.4-37 (1983) EPA-600/8-82-006B]**PEER REVIEWED**

Disulfiram (1.35 mmol/kg) was administered perorally to rabbits 24 and 6 hr prior to a 1 hr exposure (6000 ppm 32,280 mg/cu m) of trichloroethylene. When challenged with 0.5-3.0 ug/kg epinephrine, disulfiram prevented epinephrine-induced arrhythmias.
[Fossa AA et al; Toxicol Appl Pharm 66: 109-17 (1982) as cited in USEPA; Health Assessment Document: Trichloroethylene (Draft) p.5-11 (1983) EPA-600/8-82-006B]**PEER REVIEWED**

Isopropanol and acetone ... cause enhanced hepatotoxicity with ... trichloroethylene.
[Amdur, M.O., J. Doull, C.D. Klaasen (eds). Casarett and Doull's Toxicology. 4th ed. New York, NY: Pergamon Press, 1991.348]**PEER REVIEWED**

Studies /conducted/ with rats /indicate/ that the effects of trichloroethylene were more pronounced in the animals that were fed a high carbohydrate diet than those on a high protein diet. /Concentration of trichloroethylene not specified/
[Kalashinikova VP et al; Vopr Pitan 6: 43-7 (1974) as cited in WHO; Environ Health Criteria 50: Trichloroethylene p.61 (1985)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Rats exposed to 37,000, 42,000, and 56,000 mg/cu m of trichloroethylene vapor for two hours exhibited elevated activities of serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase, glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase, and isocitrate dehydrogenase. Hepatotoxicity (indicated by the increased levels of these hepatic enzymes in the serum) was greatly enhanced by pretreatment with 3-methylcholanthrene.
[Carlson GP; Res Comm Chem Pathol Pharmacol 7: 637 (1974) as cited in USEPA; Ambient Water Quality Document: Trichloroethylene p.C-19 (1980) EPA-440/5/80-007]**PEER REVIEWED**

To elicit the "degreaser's flush," ethanol was administered to seven male volunteers who were repeatedly exposed to trichloroethylene (TCE) vapor. In six exposed subjects, transient vasodilatation of superficial skin vessels occured after the ingestion of small amounts of ethanol (<0.5 ml/kg body weight). The dermal response reached maximum intensity 30 minutes after its onset and then faded completely within 60 minutes. Two factors appear necessary before the dermal response can be elicited: (1) repeated exposures to TCE and (2) ingestion of alcohol.
[Stewart RD et al; Arch Environ Health 29: 1 (1974)]**PEER REVIEWED**

... The induction of the hepatic microsomal mixed-function oxidase system by drugs, taken for therapeutic reasons, or by exposure to certain environmental chemicals (e.g., phenobarbital, toluene, PCBs) can bring about an incr rate of trichloroethylene metabolism.
[WHO; Environ Health Criteria 50: Trichloroethylene p.46 (1985)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Elimination of trichloroacetic acid & trichloroethanol was studied in rats exposed to trichloroethylene alone, or in combination with xylene, at 4.5 mmol/cu m air for five consecutive days. Prior to each inhalation, the rats were pretreated per os with ethyl alcohol at 1366 mg/kg bw or 2732 mg/kg bw. Both xylene & ethanol given separately, dependent on the dose, decreased urine elimination of trichloroacetic acid & trichloroethanol by about 34% (1366 mg/kg) & 45% (2732 mg/kg), respectively. Under conditions of the combined ethanol/xylene exposure, the xenobiotics reduced the elimination of trichloroethylene & trichloroethanol by about 80% & 20% respectively.
[Orlowski J et al; Bromatologia I Chemia ToksykologicznaOKSYKOLOGICZNA 33 (1): 15-21 (2000)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Neonatal male B6C3F1 (CRL, MI) mice were injected ip at 15 days of age with either 2.5 or 10 ug/g body weight ethylnitrosourea (ENU) (26-33/group) or 2 ul/g body weight of 0.1M sodium acetate (32/group) as the solvent control. At 28 days of age, the mice were placed on drinking water containing 3 or 40 mg/l trichloroethylene and they were killed after 61 weeks exposure to trichloroethylene. Controls (22-23/group) were given 0, 2.5, or 10 ug/g body weight ethylnitrosourea + sodium chloride (2 g/l). Trichloroethylene resulted in a significant increase in liver weight (p< 0.001) when given at 40 mg/l to mice pretreated with 2.5 ug/g body weight of ethylnitrosourea. Trichloroethylene alone, however, did not increase the incidence of adenomas or hepatocellular carcinomas above control levels.
[Herren F et al; Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 90: 183-9 (1987)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Environmental Fate & Exposure:

Environmental Fate/Exposure Summary:

Trichloroethylene's production and use in degreasing operations as well as in plastics, appliances, jewellery, automobile, plumbing fixtures, textiles, paper, glass and printing industries may result in its release to the environment through various waste streams. If released to air, a vapor pressure of 69 mm Hg at 25 deg C indicates trichloroethylene will exist solely as a vapor in the ambient atmosphere. Vapor-phase trichloroethylene will be degraded in the atmosphere by reaction with photochemically-produced hydroxyl radicals; the half-life for this reaction in air is estimated to be 7 hours. If released to soil, trichloroethylene is expected to have high mobility based upon an average Koc of 101, measured in 32 soils. Volatilization from moist soil surfaces is expected to be an important fate process based upon a Henry's Law constant of 9.85X10-3 atm-cu m/mole. Trichloroethylene is expected to volatilize from dry soil surfaces based upon its vapor pressure. Cometabolic biodegradation of trichloroethylene has been reported under aerobic conditions where additional nutrients have been added. Under anaerobic conditions, as might be seen in flooded soils, sediments or aquifer environments, trichloroethylene is slowly biodegraded via reductive dechlorination; the extent and rate of degradation is dependent upon the strength of the reducing environment. Trichloroethylene half-lives in the field for aquifer studies range from 35 days to over 6 years. If released into water, trichloroethylene is not expected to adsorb to suspended solids and sediment based on an average Koc value of 101. Volatilization from water surfaces will be an important fate process based upon this compound's Henry's Law constant. Estimated volatilization half-lives for a model river and model lake are 3.5 hours and 5 days, respectively. Volatilization half-lives in an experimental field mesocosm ranged from 10.7 to 28 days. BCF values in fish ranging from 4 to 39 suggest bioconcentration in aquatic organisms is moderate to low. Occupational exposure to trichloroethylene has been shown to occur through inhalation and dermal contact with this compound at workplaces where trichloroethylene is produced or used. Extensive monitoring data indicate that the general population may be exposed to trichloroethylene via inhalation of ambient air, ingestion of food and drinking water, and dermal contact with this compound and other consumer products containing trichloroethylene. Trichloroethylene is widely detected in groundwater. (SRC)
**PEER REVIEWED**

Probable Routes of Human Exposure:

TRICHLOROETHYLENE WHEN PRESENT IN AIR NEAR OPEN ARC WELDING MAY BE DECOMP TO LEVELS OF PHOSGENE DANGEROUS TO HEALTH, WHEREAS THE HCL AND CL2 FORMED SIMULTANEOUSLY MAY NOT ALWAYS PROVIDE AN ADEQUATE WARNING AGAINST THE PRESENCE OF PHOSGENE.
[RINZEMA LC; INT ARCH ARBEITSMED 28 (2): 151 (1971)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Many industrial workers, operating room personnel and dentists are regularly exposed to TCE, some to large doses. The general public encounters trichloroethylene in cleaning fluids, some decaffeinated coffees and spice extracts.
[Gosselin, R.E., R.P. Smith, H.C. Hodge. Clinical Toxicology of Commercial Products. 5th ed. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1984.II-165]**PEER REVIEWED**

NIOSH (NOES Survey 1981-1983) has statistically estimated that 392,805 workers (169,851 of these are female) are potentially exposed to trichloroethylene in the US(1). Occupational exposure to trichloroethylene may occur through inhalation and dermal contact with this compound at workplaces where trichloroethylene is produced or used(SRC). Extensive monitoring data indicate that the general population may be exposed to trichloroethylene via inhalation of ambient air, ingestion of food and drinking water, and dermal contact with this compound and other products containing trichloroethylene(SRC).
[(1) NIOSH; National Occupational Exposure Survey (NOES) (1983)]**PEER REVIEWED**

An open-top and an enclosed conveyor-loaded production trichloroethylene vapor degreasers had average emission factors of 2.6 g TCE/min and 0.67 g TCE/min, respectively(1). Waste gases from aluminum plasma-etching processes (using chlorine containing etchants) during semiconductor production contained trichloroethylene at an average concn of 315.70 ng /l(2). The number of US workers exposed to TCE is estimated to be 283,000(3). Operating room levels range from 0.3-103 ppm, with an estimated 5000 medical, dental and hospital personnel being routinely exposed(1). Air levels at a dial assembly workshop in Japan measured 25-100 ppm; degreasing room levels, 150-250 ppm(3). Trichloroethylene was detected in 6% of 7705 solvent air samples reported from different industries in Norway and stored in the EXPO occupational exposure database(4).
[(1) Wadden RA et al; Am Ind Hyg Asssoc J 50: 496-500 (1989) (2) Bauer S and Wolff I; in Mat Res Soc Symp Proc 447: 35-41 (1997) (3) IARC; Cadmium, Nickel, Some Epoxides, Miscellaneous Industrial Chemicals and General Consideration on Volatile Anaesthetics 11: 263 (1976) (4) Fjeldstad PE, Woldbaek T; A National Exposure Database Special Publ. - Royal Soc Chem (Natl Inst Occup Hlth, Oslo, Norway) 108(Clean Air Work): 303-10 (1992)]**PEER REVIEWED**

23-41% of trichloroethylene in feed water to showers was lost with a water temperature of 23 to 40 deg C(1). Trichloroethylene was detected in chlorinated swimming pool water from a pool in Gdansk, Poland at concns of not detected (detection limit, on average, 0.01 ug/cu dm) to 13.3 ug/cu dm for 4 different dates in 1991(2).
[(1) Tancrede M et al; Atmos Environ 26A: 1103-11 (1992) (2) Biziuk M et al; Intern J Environ Anal Chem 50: 109-15 (1993)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Body Burden:

Therapeutic or normal blood level 0.1-9 mg%
[Winek, C.L. Drug and Chemical Blood-Level Data 1985. Pittsburgh, PA: Allied Fischer Scientific, 1985.]**PEER REVIEWED**

PERSONAL AIR: The exhaled breath of 73% of 26 smokers and 81% of 43 nonsmokers contained trichloroethylene at unreported concns(1). Breath of 12.5% of 50 individuals living in the Los Angeles area contained trichloroethylene(2). 51.2% of personal air samples collected from these 50 individuals contained trichloroethylene(2). Increased personal air exposures were reported following solvent use, household cleaning, furniture stripping, visiting a dry cleaning shop, photo developing and using paint remover of up to 220 ug/cu m from a baseline of <2 ug/cu m(3). Personal air samples of Los Angeles and Contra Costa residents contained trichloroethylene at concns of 7.8 (n=110, Los Angeles residents, February 1984), 6.4(n=50, Los Angeles residents, May 1984) and 3.8 (n=67, Contra Costa residents, June 1984)(4).
[(1) Gordon SM; J Chrom 511: 291-302 (1990) (2) Hartwell TD et al; Atmos Environ 26A: 1519-27 (1992) (3) Wallace LA et al; pp. 2-181 to 2-185 in 4th Int Conf on Indoor Air Quality and Climate. Germany (1987) (4) Wallace LA et al; Atmos Environ 22: 2141-63 (1988)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Blood samples from 179 of 277 people from the general population contained trichloroethylene at a mean concn of 458 ng/l; a mean blood concn of 763 ng/l was reported from 63 of 113 urban workers as compared to 180 ng/l from 82 of 127 workers(1). Blood samples collected from workers exposed to trichloroethylene in 4 dry-cleaning shops (air concns ranged from 25-40 ppm) contained this compound (median=3.39 umol /l after work (range=0.46-12.71), 0.38 umol /l before work (range=0.15-3.58)(2). Urine samples from the same workers contained the trichloroethylene metabolite, trichloroethanol (median=54.89 umol/mol creatinine, range=5.30-177.67 after work; median=9.70 umol/mol creatinine, range=0.38-35.65 before work)(2). Kidney (n=9), lung (n=13), and muscle (n=16) tissues collected from humans in Turku, Finland in 1987 contained trichloroethylene at 0.7, 0.02, and 0.2 ug/kg, respectively(3). 20% of composite adipose tissue samples collected in FY82 (n=46 composite samples) contained trichloroethylene(4). Breathing air samples from 30 residents of Tokyo, Japan had a mean concn of 2.0 ug/cu m trichloroethylene with a calculated daily intake due to breathing ambient air of 40 ug/person (men 24.9 ug/person; women 51.5 ug/person)(5). Breath samples of Los Angeles and Contra Costa residents contained trichloroethylene at concns of 1.6 (n=110, Los Angeles residents, February 1984), 1.0 (n=50, Los Angeles residents, May 1984) and 0.6 (n=67, Contra Costa residents, June 1984)(6).
[(1) Brugnone F et al; Med Lav 85: 370-89 (1994) (2) Kender LJ et al; Arch Environ Hlth 46: 174-78 (1991) (3) Kroneld R; Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 42: 873-77 (1989) (4) Onstot JD, Stanley JS; Identification of SARA Compounds in Adipose Tissue. Washington DC: US EPS, Office of Toxic Substances, USEPA-560/5-89-003 (1989) (5) Nakahama T et al; Jpn J Toxicol Environ Hlth; 43: 280-84 (1997) (6) Wallace LA et al; Atmos Environ 22: 2141-63 (1988)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Trichloroethylene was detected in mother's milk samples from 4 US urban areas, with 8 of 8 samples testing pos(1). Concns in post-mortem wet tissue samples were 1-32 ppb(2). Breath samples Love Canal residents, Niagara Falls, NY contained a trace of trichloroethylene with 4 of 9 samples pos; blood - 0.09.50 ppb, 6 of 9 samples pos; and urine - 40-550 parts/trillion, 9 of 9 samples pos(3). Concns in whole blood specimens from 250 subjects ranged from not detected to 1.5 ppb, with a 0.4 ppb avg(4).
[(1) Pellizzari ED et al; Bull Contam Toxicol 28: 322-8 (1982) (2) IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Man 11: 263-76 (1976) (3) Barkley J et al; Biomed Mass Spectrom 7: 139-47 (1980) (4) Antoine SR et al; Bull Environ Toxicol 36: 364-71 (1986)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Trichloroethylene was detected in the blood of 13 of 677 samples taken from non-occupationally exposed Americans (detection limit= 0.010 ppb(1). Trichloroethylene was measured in blood samples collected from 79 humans at concns ranging from <0.015 to 0.090 ug/l(2). Exhaled breath from humans following both inhalation and dermal exposures during showering or dermal exposure following bathing using normal tap water contained trichloroethylene at concns up to 0.32 ug/cu m/ug/l(3).
[(1) Ashley DL et al; Clin Chem 40: 1401-4 (1994) (2) Skender L et al; Arch Environ Hlth 49: 445-51 (1994) (3) Weisel CP, Jo W-K; Environ Hlth Perspect 104: 48-51 (1996)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Natural Pollution Sources:

Trichloroethylene is not known to occur as a natural product.
[IARC. Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Man. Geneva: World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1972-PRESENT. (Multivolume work).V20 550 (1979)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Artificial Pollution Sources:

Trichloroethylene's production and use in degreasing operations in five main industrial groups (furniture and fixtures, fabricated metal products, electric and electronic equipment, transport equipment and miscellaneous manufacturing industries)(1) may result in its release to the environment through various waste streams(SRC). It is also used in plastics, appliances, jewellery, automobile, plumbing fixtures, textiles, paper, glass and printing industries(1). Air emissions from metal degreasing plants contain trichloroethylene(2); it has also been reported in wastewater from metal finishing, paint and ink formulation, electrical/electronic components, and rubber processing industries(3).
[(1) IARC Monographs; Dry Cleaning, Some Chlorinated Solvents and Other Industrial Chemicals, IARC/World Health Organization, Lyon, France, Vol 63, p. 80 (1995) (2) Ewing BB et al; Monitoring to Detect Previously Unrecognized Pollutants in Surface Waters. USEPA-560/6-77-015 p. 74 (1977) (3) USEPA; Treatability Manual pp.I.12.23-1 to I.12-23-5 USEPA-600/2-82-001A (1981)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Environmental Fate:

TERRESTRIAL FATE: Based on a classification scheme(1), an average Koc value of 101, based on measurements in 32 soils(2), indicates that trichloroethylene is expected to have high mobility in soil(SRC). Volatilization of trichloroethylene from moist soil surfaces is expected to be an important fate process(SRC) given a Henry's Law constant of 9.85X10-3 atm-cu m/mole(3). The potential for volatilization of trichloroethylene from dry soil surfaces may exist(SRC) based upon a vapor pressure of 69 mm Hg(4). The initial percentage of trichloroethylene in the gas (24, 52, 57%), liquid (5, 3, 4%) and adsorbed (71, 45, 39%) phases was determined in three soils, respectively (Rindge, 11.2% organic matter, 35.4% moisture; Yolo, 2.2% organic matter, 11.7% moisture; Reiff, 1.4% organic matter, 13.9% moisture)(5). Trichloroethylene is resistant to aerobic biodegradation although biodegradation may proceed cometabolically(5,6). Under anaerobic conditions, as might be seen in soil microsites, flooded soils or aquifer sites, trichloroethylene is slowly biodegraded via reductive dechlorination; the extent and rate of degradation is dependent upon the strength of the reducing environment(7).
[(1) Swann RL et al; Res Rev 85: 17-28 (1983) (2) Rathbun RE; Transport, Behavior, and Fate of Volatile Organic Compounds in Streams. USGS Professional Paper 1589, PB98-163397(1998) (3) Leighton DT Jr, Calo JM; J Chem Eng Data 26: 382-85 (1981) (4) Boublik T et al; The Vapour Pressures of Pure Substances, Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publ p. 87 (1984) (5) Fan S, Scow KM; Appl Environ Microbiol 59: 1911-18 (1993) (6) El-Farham YH et al; Wat Res Research 34: 437-45 (1998) (7) McCarty PL; Symp Nat Atten Chlor Org Ground Water USEPA/540/R-96/509 pp. 5-9 (1996)]**PEER REVIEWED**

AQUATIC FATE: Based on a classification scheme(1), an average Koc value of 101, based on measurements in 32 soils(2), indicates that trichloroethylene is not expected to adsorb to suspended solids and sediment(SRC). Volatilization from water surfaces is expected to be a major fate process for this compound in water(3) based upon a Henry's Law constant of 9.85X10-3 atm-cu m/mole(4). Using this Henry's Law constant and an estimation method(3), volatilization half-lives for a model river and model lake are 3.5 hours and 5 days, respectively(SRC). Trichloroethylene volatilization half-lives from a mesocosm field experiment in Narragansett Bay ranged from 10.7 to 28 days(5). Trichloroethylene is not degraded under aerobic conditions although cometabolic biodegradation has been reported under conditions where additional nutrients have been added(6-8). Under anaerobic conditions, as might be seen in sediments or groundwater, trichloroethylene is slowly biodegraded via reductive dechlorination; the extent and rate of degradation is dependent upon the strength of the reducing environment(9). According to a classification scheme(10), BCF values ranging from 4.0 in carp(11) to 39 in rainbow trout(12), suggests the potential for bioconcentration in aquatic organisms is low to moderate.
[(1) Swann RL et al; Res Rev 85: 17-28 (1983) (2) Meylan WM et al; Environ Sci Technol 26: 1560-67 (1992) (3) Lyman WJ et al; Handbook of Chemical Property Estimation Methods. Washington, DC: Amer Chem Soc pp. 4-9, 15-1 to 15-29 (1990) (4) Leighton DT Jr, Calo JM; J Chem Eng Data 26: 382-85 (1981) (5) Wakeham SG et al; Environ Sci Technol 17: 611-17 (1983) (6) Hopkins GD, McCarty PL; Environ Sci Technol 29: 1628-37 (1995) (7) Semprini L et al; Ground Water 28: 715-27 (1990) (8) Semprini L et al; Ground Water 29: 239-50 (1991) (9) McCarty PL; Symp Nat Atten Chlor Org Ground Water USEPA/540/R-96/509 pp. 5-9 (1996) (10) Franke C et al; Chemosphere 29: 1501-14 (1994) (11) Chemicals Inspection and Testing Institute; Biodeg Bioaccum Data Existing Chem Based on the CSCL Japan, ISBN 4-89074-101-1, Ministry of Internatl Trade & Industry, Japan p. 2-24 (1992) (12) Lyman WJ; Handbook of Chemical Property Estimation Methods Ann Arbor Sci, MI p. 5-9 (1981)]**PEER REVIEWED**

ATMOSPHERIC FATE: According to a model of gas/particle partitioning of semivolatile organic compounds in the atmosphere(1), trichloroethylene, which has a vapor pressure of 69 mm Hg at 25 deg C(2), is expected to exist solely as a vapor in the ambient atmosphere. Vapor-phase trichloroethylene is degraded in the atmosphere by reaction with photochemically-produced hydroxyl radicals(SRC); the half-life for this reaction in air is estimated to be 7 days(SRC), calculated from its rate constant of 2.36X10-12 cu cm/molecule-sec at 25 deg C(3). Phosgene, dichloroacetyl chloride, chloroform and formyl chloride are formed from the reaction of trichloroethylene with hydroxyl radicals(4-6).
[(1) Bidleman TF; Environ Sci Technol 22: 361-367 (1988) (2) Boublik T et al; The Vapour Pressures of Pure Substances, Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publ p. 87 (1984) (3) Atkinson R; J Phys Chem Ref Data Monograph No. 2 p. 116 (1994) (1989) (4) Kao AS; J Air Waste Manage Assoc 44: 683-96 (1994) (5) Gay BW et al; Environ Sci Tech 10: 58-67 (1976) (6) Cupitt LT; Fate of Toxic and Hazardous Materials in the Air Environment USEPA-600/3-80-084 (1980)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Environmental Biodegradation:

AEROBIC: Under aerobic conditions, trichloroethylene is biodegraded only in the presence of another compound that can support microbial growth in a process called cometabolism; biodegradation is generally complete and vinyl chloride is not produced(2). Indigenous sources of carbon associated with soil organic matter did not support cometabolic degradation of trichloroethylene in a soil study(3). Trichloroethylene was aerobically degraded in a column composed of aquifer sediments by 9 and 87% during the first 6.5 months and the following 3.5 months, respectively; the initial loss of 9% may have been due to abiotic losses such as adsorption or volatilization(1). cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene was reported as the major product of trichloroethylene degradation in this experiment(1). Trichloroethylene was mineralized by up to 30% in microcosms containing soil and vegetation from a former trichloroethylene-contaminated site (4). Microcosms which were either non-vegetated or sterile showed mineralization of trichloroethylene, measured as CO2 production, of 10 to 15% and 5 to 10%, respectively(4).
[(1) Enzien MV et al; Appl Environ Microbiol 60: 2200-4 (1994) (2) El-Farham YH et al; Wat Res Research 34: 437-45 (1998) (3) Fan S, Scow KM; Appl Environ Microbiol 59: 1911-18 (1993)(4) Anderson TA, Walton BT; Environ Toxicol Chem 14: 2041-2047 (1995)]**PEER REVIEWED**

AEROBIC: In a municipal activated sludge plant, 47.3, 47.8, and 0.0% of the influent trichloroethylene concn (at 40.7 ug/l) was biodegraded, stripped and found in the waste sludge, respectively (effluent concn of 2.0 ug/l)(1). Two laboratory scale activated sludge reactors (AS-L, AS-H) and 2 biological aerated filter reactors (BAF-L, BAF-H) under high- and low-loaded conditions were used to study the removal of trichloroethylene during wastewater treatment(2). The average influent concn was 32.1 ug /l; effluent concns for AS-L, AS-H, BAF-L, and BAF-H were 5.3, 6.1, 2.3, and 9.7 ug/l, respectively(2). Loss due to biodegradation was 0, 0, 58, and 3% influent loadings, respectively, while loss due to stripping was 66, 85, 34, and 67% influent loadings, respectively(2).
[(1) Parker WJ et al; Wat Environ Res 65: 58-65 (1993) (2) Clapp LW et al; Water Environ Res 66: 153-60 (1994)]**PEER REVIEWED**

ANAEROBIC: 90% of trichloroethylene initially added to contaminated bed sediments from a freshwater lake and incubated under methanogenic conditions for 60 days was degraded; ethene (46%), methane(9%) and carbon dioxide (12%) were produced during its degradation(1). Biodegradation rates for trichloroethylene in anaerobic groundwater field studies were reported as follows: Dover Air Force Base, DE (half-life of 2.8 years; methanogenic, redox>50 mV)(2); Vejen Landfill, Denmark (4 in situ microcosms, methanogenic, no biodegradation over 180 days(5), Grindsted Landfill, Denmark (methanogenic/iron- and sulfate-reducing conditions, 924 day monitoring period, half-lives=533-2310 days)(6), Plattsburgh Air Force Base, NY (3 transects, half-lives of 0.56 years, 1.82 years, and no degradation)(7), Tibbetts Road Superfund site, NH (3 transects, half-lives=1.17 to 1.69 years)(8), St. Joseph, MI (half-lives of 1.82, 0.53, 0.745, 0.495 years)(9,10), St. Joseph, MI (half-lives of 113, 124, and 433 days for 3 different transects)(3), Picatinny Arsenal, NJ (half- life of 0.578 years(10); half-life of 2.2 years(11)), Sacramento, CA (half-life of 0.63 years)(10), Necco Park, NY (half-life of 1 year)(10), Plattsburgh Air Force Base, NY (half-lives of 0.53 years, 3.01 years and no biodegradation)(10), San Francisco, CA (half-life of 0.16 years)(10), Cecil Field, FL (half-lives of 0.095 to 0.21 years)(10), Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska (half-life of 3.8 years), and Cape Canaveral Air Station, Florida (half-life of 2.4 years)(12). Trichloroethylene was degraded under methanogenic and sulfate-reducing conditions in a fractured bedrock aquifer to ethene(4).
[(1) Bradley PM, Chapelle FH; Environ Sci Technol 33: 653-56 (1999) (2) Ellis DE et al; in Symp Nat Atten Chlorin Org Ground Water USEPA/540/R-96/509 (1996) (3) Weaver JW et al; Field-Derived Transform Rates Model Nat Bioatten Trichloroethene and its Degrad Prod. Ada, OK: Nat Risk Manag Res Lab, USEPA/600/A-95/142 NTIS PB96-139092 (1995) (4) Major D et al; pp. 197-203 in Int Biorem, Pap Int In-Situ On-Site Bioreclam Symp, 3rd. Hinchee RE et al, eds. Columbus, OH: Battelle Press (1995) (5) Nielsen PH et al; J Contam Hydrol 20: 51-66 (1995) (6) Rugge K et al; Wat Res Research 35: 1231-46 (1999) (7) Wiedemeier TH et al; pp 74-82 in Symp Nat Atten Chlor Org Groundwater, USEPA/540/R-96/509 (1996) (8) Wilson BH et al; in Symp Nat Atten Chlor Organ Ground Water, USEPA/540/R-96/509 (1996) (9) Wilson JT et al; Intrinsic Biorem of JP-4 Jet Fuel. USEPA/540/R-94/515 (1994) (10) Wilson JT et al; in Symp Nat Atten Chlorin Org Ground Water. USEPA/540/R-96/509 (1996) (11) Imbrigiotta TE et al; pp. 83-89 in Symp Nat Atten Chlor Org Ground Water USEPA/540/R-96/509 (1996) (12) Swanson M et al; in Symp Nat Atten Chlor Org Ground Water, USEPA USEPA/540/R-96/509 p. 166 (1996)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Biodegradation rates for trichloroethylene in anaerobic aquifer microcosm studies were reported as follows: Wilder's Grove, NC landfill (methanogenic, lag phase of <41 to >300 days; degradation complete within 40 to 110 days once started)(1), Dover Air Force Base, DE(methanogenic, half-lives of 57 and 267 days for 2 locations at site)(2), Picatinny Arsenal, NJ (first-order rate constant of 0.001 to 0.02 per week)(3), Picatinny Arsenal, NJ (half-lives of 1.1, 1.65, and 3.3 years)(6), Picatinny Arsenal, NJ (first-order rate constant of 0.004 to 0.035 per week)(7), Vejen Landfill, Denmark(4 microcosms, methanogenic, no degradation over 140-180 days)(4), Tibbetts Road Superfund site, NH (half-lives of 0.188 years(5), 0.144 years(6)), St. Joseph, MI (half-lives of 0.385 and 0.58 years), and Traverse City, MI (half-life of 0.385 years)(6). In situ microcosm studies were conducted in both polluted aerobic and anaerobic and in unpolluted aerobic aquifer conditions in the Vejen City landfill; trichloroethylene was not degraded under either oxygen condition over a 90-day period(9). Trichloroethylene is reductively dechlorinated forming cis-1,2-dichloroethylene initially, then vinyl chloride and possibly ethene and ethane depending on the strength of the reducing environment(8). Under iron or sulfate-reducing conditions, cis-1,2-dichloroethylene is the major metabolite of trichloroethylene biodegradation while ethene is the major metabolite under methanogenic conditions(10).
[(1) Johnston JJ et al; J Contam Hydrol 23: 263-83 (1996) (2) Lige JE et al; pp. 313-320 in Biorem Chlor Solvents, Pap Int In Situ On-Site Bioreclam Symp. 3rd. Hinchee RE et al, eds. Columbus, OH: Battelle Press (1995) (3) Martin M, Imbrigiotta TE; pp. 109-15 in USEPA Symp Natural Atten Ground Water, Denver, CO EPA/600/R-94/162 (1994) (4) Nielsen PH et al; J Contam Hydrol 20: 51-66 (1995) (5) Wilson BH et al; pp. 21-28 in Symp Nat Atten Chlor Org Ground Water, USEPA/540/R-96/509 (1996) (6) Wilson JT et al; in Symp Nat Atten Chlorin Org Ground Water, USEPA/540/R-96/509 (1996) (7) Ehlke TA, Imbrigiotta TE; in Symp Nat Atten Chlor Org Ground Water. Hyatt Regency Dallas. Dallas, TX. USEPA EPA/540/R-96/509 (1996) (8) McCarty PL; pp. 5-9 in Symp Nat Atten Chlor Org Ground Water USEPA/540/R-96/509 (1996) (9) Nielson PH et al; Chemosphere 25: 449-62 (1992) (10) Lendvay JM et al; Environ Sci Technol 32: 3472-78 (1998)]**PEER REVIEWED**

ANAEROBIC: Mass balance analysis of the loss of trichloroethylene from an aquifer beneath Picatinny Arsenal showed that 78, 11, and 11% of the trichloroethylene annually removed was due to biodegradation, advective transport to a local water body, and advection-driven volatilization, respectively(1).
[(1) Imbrigiotta TE et al; pp. 83-89 in Symp Nat Atten Chlor Org Ground Water, USEPA/540/R-96/509 (1996)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Environmental Abiotic Degradation:

The rate constant for the vapor-phase reaction of trichloroethylene with photochemically-produced hydroxyl radicals has been measured as 2.36X10-12 cu cm/molecule-sec at 25 deg C(1). This corresponds to an atmospheric half-life of about 7 days at an atmospheric concn of 5X10+5 hydroxyl radicals per cu cm(1). Atmospheric residence time based upon reaction with hydroxyl radical is 5 to 6 days(2-4) with the production of phosgene, dichloroacetyl chloride, chloroform and formyl chloride(3,6,7). The rate constant for the vapor-phase reaction of trichloroethylene with nitrate radicals has been measured as 2.93X10-16 cu cm/molecule-sec at 25 deg C(13). This corresponds to an atmospheric half-life of about 114 days at an atmospheric concn of 2.4X10+8 nitrate radicals per cu cm(14). Ozone depletion potential values for trichloroethylene range from 0.083 to 0.13 relative to CFC-11(8). The mean value for the gas scavenging ratio for trichloroethylene is 3.7 at 8 deg C(9). Trichloroethylene is relatively reactive under smog conditions(12) with 60% degradation in 140 min(6) and 50% degradation in 1 to 3.5 hours(11) reported. Trichloroethylene is not hydrolyzed by water under normal conditions(10). Trichloroethylene absorbs light greater than 290 nm weakly; therefore, direct photolysis is not expected to be an important fate prcoess(10). However, slow photooxidation in water has been noted (half-life of l0.7 months)(11).
[(1) Atkinson R; J Phys Chem Ref Data. Monograph 2. P. 116 (1994) (2) Chang JS, Kaufman F; J Chem Phys 66: 4989-94 (1977) (3) Cupitt LT; Fate of Toxic and Hazardous Materials in the Air Environment USEPA-600/3-80-084 (1980) (4) Singh HB et al; Atmos Environ 15: 601-12 (1981) (5) Kao AS; J Air Waste Manage Assoc 44: 683-96 (1994) (6) Gay BW et al; Environ Sci Tech 10: 58-67 (1976) (7) Itoh N et al; Chemosphere 28: 2029-40 (1994) (8) Kindler TP et al; J Geophys Res 100: 1235-51 (1995) (9) Rathbun RE; Transport, Behavior, and Fate of Volatile Organic Compounds in Streams, US Geological Survey Prof Paper 1589, USGS, NTIS PB98-163-397 (1998) (10) Callahan MA et al; Water-Related Environmental Fate of 129 Priority Pollutants - Vol II USEPA-440/4-79-029B (1979) (11) Dilling WL; Environ Sci Tech 9: 833-8 (1975) (12) Yanagihara S et al; pp. 472-7 in Photochemical Reactivities of Hydrocarbons Proc Int Clean Air Congress, 4th (1977) (13) Sabljic A, Gusten H; Atmos Environ 24A: 73-78 (1990) (14) Atkinson R et al; Atmos Env 24: 2647-81 (1990)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Two pilot-scale activated sludge systems (flow rate 35 gpm; hydraulic retention time 7.5 hours; SRT of 4 days) fed municipal wastewater were spiked with 0.25 mg/l trichloroethylene in combination with 46 other compounds; 103% removal of trichloroethylene was obtained through stripping(1).
[(1) Bhattacharya SK et al; Removal and Fate of RCRA and CERCLA Toxic Organic Pollutants in Wastewater Treatment. Cincinnati, OH: US EPA USEPA/600/S2-89/026 (1990)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Environmental Bioconcentration:

BCF values of 17 and 39(1) were measured in bluegill sunfish and rainbow trout, respectively. In carp, BCF values of 4.3 to 17 and 4.0 to 16.0 were reported for trichloroethylene at 70 and 7 ug/l, respectively(2). A BCF of 302 was measured in a green alga(4). According to a classification scheme(3), these BCF values suggest the potential for bioconcentration in aquatic organisms is moderate to low. Marine monitoring data suggest only moderate bioconcentration (2-25 times) of trichloroethylene(5,6).
[(1) Lyman WJ; Handbook of Chemical Property Estimation Methods Ann Arbor Sci, MI p. 5-9(1981) (2) Chemicals Inspection and Testing Institute; Biodegradation and bioaccumulation data of existing chemicals based on the CSCL Japan. Japan Chemical Industry Ecology - Toxicology and Information Center. ISBN 4-89074-101-1 p. 2-24 (1992) (3) Franke C et al; Chemosphere 29: 1501-14 (1994) (4) Rathbun RE; Transport, Behavior, and Fate of Volatile Organic Compounds in Streams, US Geological Survey Prof Paper 1589, USGS, NTIS PB98-163-397 (1998) (5) Dickson AG, Riley JP; Marine Pollut Bull 7: 167-9 (1976) (6) Pearson CR, McConnell G; Proc Roy Soc London Ser B 189: 305-32 (1975)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Soil Adsorption/Mobility:

Measured Koc values of 100(1), 110(2), 72 to 180 (organic matter of <1.0 to 5%(3), 66(8), 49 (peat soil)(10), 72, 96, 142(5) and 58 (peat soil)(5). The average Kd value for trichloroethylene, applied with a mixture of organic compounds to low organic, subsurface soils (average foc=0.00017), was 0.093(4). Kp values of 1.06 (coarse sand), 0.67 (silty-clay loam), 0.17 (fine sand), 6.0 (podzolic sand, % organic content=0.90), 4.2 (sandy soil, % organic content=6.07), 32 (peat soil, % organic content=59.3) and 1.24 (Bandelier tuff, % organic content=0.11) have been reported for trichloroethylene(11). A study of 32 soils(foc range of 0.0012 to 0.31) reported an average Koc of 101(5). Koc values for trichloroethylene in a loess sand, weathered shale, and unweathered shale were 123, 363, and 2691, respectively(6). In nine different soils (foc ranging from 0.13 to 1.2%), Koc values ranged from 69 to 209(7). Trichloroethylene from soil samples which had been contaminated for 18 years was found to be resistant to desorption, requiring extended periods of time for equilibration(9). According to a classification scheme(12), these Koc values generally suggest that trichloroethylene is expected to have moderate to high mobility in soil. Trichloroethylene partitioned from an aqueous solution of Bandelier tuff under equilibrium conditions to 64-81% in water, 16-23% in vapor phase, and 2-20% in the tuff(13).
[(1) Bahnick DA, Doucette WJ; Chemosphere 17: 1703-15 (1988) (2) Borisover MD, Graber ER; Chemosphere 34: 1761-76 (1997) (3) Brigmon RL et al; J Soil Contam 7: 433-53 (1998) (4) Carmichael LM et al; J Environ Qual 28: 888-97 (1999) (5) Rathbun RE; Transport, Behavior, and Fate of Volatile Organic Compounds in Streams. USGS Professional Paper 1589, NTIS PB98 163397 (1998) (6) Grathwohl P; Environ Sci Technol 24: 1687-93 (1990) (7) Mouvet C et al; J Hydrol 149: 163-82 (1993) (8) Sahoo D, Smith JA; Environ Sci Technol 31: 1910-15 (1997) (9) Pavlostathis SG, Jaglal K; Environ Sci Technol 25: 274-79 (1991) (10) Chiou CT, Kile DE; Environ Sci Technol 32: 338-43 (1998) (11) Fuentes HR et al; Haz Waste Haz Mater 7: 347-59 (1990) (12) Swann RL et al; Res Rev 85: 17-28 (1983) (13) Fuentes HR et al; Haz Waste Haz Mater 7: 347-59 (1990)]**PEER REVIEWED**

In a field groundwater test, no sorption of trichloroethylene onto organic carbon or mineral surfaces present in the sand aquifer was observed(1). Two field studies, both of shallow confined aquifers, reported retardation factors from 5 to 9 (foc=0.11%) and 11.4 (foc=0.11%)(2). In undisturbed rock cores from the Coventry sandstone aquifer system (foc=0.7 to 0.8%), trichloroethylene had a retardation factor of less than 3 indicating that it should migrate readily with water(2). Other column studies using sand aquifer material reported retardation factors from 1.1 to 4.7(2). A retardation factor of 1.1 was reported for trichloroethylene in the aquifer underlying the Canadian Forces Base in Borden, Ontario(3). The initial percentage of trichloroethylene in the gas (24, 52, 57%), liquid (5, 3, 4%) and adsorbed (71, 45, 39%) phases was determined in three soils, respectively (Rindge, 11.2% organic matter, 35.4% moisture; Yolo, 2.2% organic matter, 11.7% moisture; Reiff, 1.4% organic matter, 13.9% moisture)(9). Sorption in these soils followed reversible, linear sorption isotherms(9). Sorption of trichloroethylene vapor to soil is possible; linear sorption coefficients of trichloroethylene from the vapor phase were about one to four orders of magnitude greater than those from the aqueous phase based on studies using six different US EPA soils and sediments under varying moisture contents(10).
[(1) Benker E et al; in Proc Prague Conf IAHS Publ No 225(Groundwater Quality: Remediation and Protection): 61-9 (1995) (2) Bourg ACM et al; J Hydrol 149: 187-207 (1993) (3) Broholm K et al; Environ Sci Technol 33: 681-90 (1999) (4) Wilson JT et al; J Environ Qual 10: 501-6 (1981) (5) Sontheimer H; J Amer Water Works Assoc 72: 386-90 (1980) (6) Schwarzenbach RP et al; Environ Sci Technol 17: 472-9 (1983) (7) Zoeteman BCJ et al; Chemosphere 9: 231-49 (1980) (8) Rogers RD, McFarlane JC; Environ Monit Assess 1: 155-62 (1981) (9) Fan S, Scow KM; Appl Environ Microbiol 59: 1911-18 (1993) (10) Shimizu Y et al; Wat Sci Tech 26: 79-87 (1992)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Volatilization from Water/Soil:

The Henry's Law constant for trichloroethylene is 9.85X10-3 atm-cu m/mole(1). This Henry's Law constant indicates that trichloroethylene is expected to volatilize rapidly from water surfaces(2). Based on this Henry's Law constant, the volatilization half-life from a model river (1 m deep, flowing 1 m/sec, wind velocity of 3 m/sec)(2) is estimated as 3.5 hours(SRC). The volatilization half-life from a model lake (1 m deep, flowing 0.05 m/sec, wind velocity of 0.5 m/sec)(2) is estimated as 5 days(SRC). Half-lives of evaporation from laboratory water surfaces (distilled water) have been reported to be on the order of several minutes to hours, depending upon the turbulence(4,5). Half-lives of trichloroethylene from an experimental marine ecosystem (MERL) under field conditions and during periods when volatilization appeared to dominate ranged from 10.7 to 28 days; turbulence is expected to be greater in open water resulting in even faster half-lives(6). The potential for volatilization of trichloroethylene from dry soil surfaces exists(SRC) based upon a vapor pressure of 69 mm Hg(3).
[(1) Leighton DT Jr, Calo JM; J Chem Eng Data 26: 382-85 (1981) (2) Lyman WJ et al; Handbook of Chemical Property Estimation Methods. Washington, DC: Amer Chem Soc pp. 15-1 to 15-29 (1990) (3) Boublik T et al; The Vapour Pressures of Pure Substances, Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publ p. 87 (1984) (4) Dilling WL; Environ Sci Technol 9: 833-8 (1975) (5) Lyman WJ et al; Handbook of Chemical Property Estimation Methods NY: McGraw-Hill pp. 15-25 (1981) (6) Wakeham SG et al; Environ Sci Technol 17: 611-7 (1983)]**PEER REVIEWED**

The transport behavior of trichloroethylene vapor in a section of unsaturated sands and silts at a field site in Borden, Ontario was studied(1). Movement of trichloroethylene vapor through unsaturated layers was shown to be lateral based on the density-induced advective flow of the contaminated soil gas(1). Gas-phase diffusion coefficients for trichloroethylene in tuff soils with varying moisture content were measured(2). Under wet conditions (12-15% moisture), diffusion coefficients of 0.0022-0.0067 and 0.0067-0.0070 sq cm/sec were determined for trichloroethylene; under dry conditions (1-3% moisture, diffusion coefficients of 0.0211-0.0230 and 0.0237-0.0292 sq cm/sec were determined(2). Soil diffusion coefficients were measured for trichloroethylene at 3 different soil porosities (0.29 to 0.43); values ranged from 0.254X10-3 to 1.986X10-3 sq cm/sec, with the larger values associated with higher soil porosity levels(4). The total amount of trichloroethylene that volatilizes in 100 days may be reduced from 84.6% volatilized without vapor sorption to 73.2% in a soil with increasing water content with depth, based on a flexible finite element transport model(3). Using the same model, vapor sorption enhanced the rate of volatilization in 100 days for a soil with low water content at depth from 72.4% without vapor sorption to 90.3% with vapor sorption(3). Very dry soil conditions combined with a soil type having strong vapor sorption characteristics may significantly retard the transport of trichloroethylene (in the vapor phase)(3).
[(1) Hughes BM et al; pp. 81-88 in Subsurface Contamination by Immiscible Fluids. Weyer, ed. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Balkema, ISBN 90-6191-1753 (1992) (2) Fuentes HR et al; J Environ Qual 20: 215-21 (1991) (3) Culver TB et al; Wat Res Research 27: 2259-70 (1991) (4) Hutter GM et al; Wat Environ Res 64: 69-77 (1992)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Environmental Water Concentrations:

GROUNDWATER: Trichloroethylene was the most frequently detected organic chemical and in highest concentration; 28% of wells from 8 states sampled positive with a max conc reported at 35,000 ppb(2); 38.5% of 13 US cities tested positive with a mean concn 29.72 ppb, range 0.2-125 ppb(1). A study in New Jersey of 670 wells showed that 1.8% and 4.0% of wells had concn >100 ppb and >10 ppb, respectively(3). Groundwater samples in the Netherlands collected from 1976-78, at 232 pumping stations, showed that 67% were positive (>0.01 ppb) for trichloroethylene(4).
[(1) Council on Environmental Quality Contamination of Groundwater by Toxic Organic Chemicals pp. 26-34 (1980) (2) Dyksen JE, Hess AF III; J Amer Water Work Assoc 394-403 (1982) (3) Wilson JT, Wilson BH; ApplEnviron Microbial 49: 243-3 (1985) (4) Zoeteman BCJ et al; Sci Total Environ 21: 187-202 (1981)]**PEER REVIEWED**

GROUNDWATER: Trichloroethylene concns measured at 6 landfill sites in southern Ontario ranged from below the method detection limit (not given)(3 of 6 sites) to 21 ug/l(1). 10 of 27 groundwater sites in Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan (samples collected 1995-1998), contained trichloroethylene at concns from <0.1 to 220 ug/l(2). In a study of groundwater beneath 27 Swedish landfills, median and maximum concns of <0.1 and 5.0 ug/l trichloroethylene were reported(3). 13% of groundwater alluvial wells monitored in Denver metropolitan in 1993 contained trichloroethylene (max concn 2 ug/l)(4). Trichloroethylene was detected in 10.1% (n=208 wells) of groundwater samples collected in urban areas by the National Water-Quality Assessment Program at a maximum concn of 230 ug/l (reporting limit=0.2 ug/l; 3 wells exceeded MCL or health advisory level)(5). An assessment of untreated ambient groundwater in the US from 1985 to 1995 was conducted as part of the National Water-Quality Assessment Program; trichloroethylene was detected in 11.6% of urban wells (n=406) and 1.6% of rural wells (n=2542)(6). 26 of 1,083 shallow wells and 14 of 277 deep wells sampled in 15 cities in Japan in 1983 contained measurable concns of trichloroethylene(7). Of 210 urban wells and springs sampled during the USGS National water-Quality Assessment Program, 10% contained trichloroethylene(8).
[(1) Barker JF; Water Poll Res J Canada 22: 33-48 (1987) (2) Abe A; Sci Total Environ 227: 41-7 (1999) (3) Assmuth TW, Strandberg T; Water Air Soil Pollut 69: 179-99 (1993) (4) Bruce BW, McMahon PB; J Hydrol 186: 129-51 (1996) (5) Kolpin DW et al; pp. 469-74 in Groundwater in the Urban Environment: Problems, Processes and Management, Chilton et al, eds. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Balkema ISBN 90-5410-837-1 (1997) (6) Squillace PJ et al; Environ Sci Technol 33: 4176-87 (1999) (7) Tase N; Environ Geol Water Sci 20: 15-20 (1992) (8) Squillace PT et al; Div Environ Chem Preprints Extend Abst 37: 372-3 (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

DRINKING WATER: 28 of 113 US public water supplies tested positive for trichloroethylene, mean 2.1 ppb(1). Trichloroethylene was found in finished groundwater in 36% of 25 US cities at a mean concn of 6.76 ppb, range 0.11-53.0 ppb(2). Samples from the Love Canal, Niagara Falls, NY showed that 7 of 9 samples tested positive, with a concn range of 10-250 parts/trillion(3). 466 random samples of finished groundwater showed that 6.4% pos, 1 ppb median concn, 78 ppb max concn(4). State data, 2894 samples, showed that 28.0% tested positive for trichloroethylene from a trace to 35,000 ppb; in the US National Screening Program, of 142 samples, 25.4% tested positive with a trace to 53 ppb and in a Community Water Supply Survey, 3.3% of 452 samples were positive, with a concn range of 0.5-210 ppb(5).
[(1) Brass HJ et al; Drinking Water Qual Enhancement Source Prot pp. 393-416 (1977) (2) Council on Environmental Quality Contamination of Groundwater by Toxic Organic Chemicals pp. 26-34 (1980) (3) Barkley J et al; Biomed Mass Spectrom 7: 139-47 (1980) (4) Cotruvo JA; Sci Total Environ 47: 7-26 (1985) (5) Cotruvo JA et al; pp. 511-30 In: Organic Carcinogens in Drinking Water (1986)]**PEER REVIEWED**

DRINKING WATER: Trichloroethylene was detected in drinking water from Zagreb, Croatia at concns ranging from <0.05 to 22.93 ug/l(1). Trichloroethylene tap water concns ranged from 0.03 to 2.1 ug/l according to the EPA's National Organics Monitoring Survey, published in 1977(2). Concns of trichloroethylene in groundwater before and after treatment from June 1995 to May 1996 at a water-pumping station in Zagreb, Croatia, ranged from 5.05-12.90 ug/l (mean=8.55 ug/l) and 2.16 to 15.29 ug/l (mean=8.53 ug/l), respectively(3). The Eau Clair Municipal Well field, WI, supplies drinking water to 57,600 residents; concns of trichloroethylene in water samples at this site ranged from 0.02 to 13 ug/l(4). This is currently listed as a Superfund site(4). Trichloroethylene was measurable in 8, 12, and 66% of collected drinking water samples in Los Angeles (Jan/Feb 1984), Los Angeles (May 1984), and Contra Costa (June 1984), respectively(5).
[(1) Skender L et al; Arch Environ Hlth 49: 445-51 (1994) (2) Tancrede MV, Yanagisawa Y; J Air Waste Manage Assoc 40: 1658-63 (1990) (3) Vedrina-Dragojevic I, Dragojevic D; Sci Total Environ 203: 253-59 (1997) (4) Canter LW, Sabatini DA; Intern J Environ Studies 46: 35-57 (1994) (5) Wallace LA et al; Atmos Environ 22: 2141-63 (1988)]**PEER REVIEWED**

SURFACE WATER: Trichloroethylene concns of 1-24 ppb were measured in industrial rivers in US, with Lake Erie - 188 ppb, 88 of 204 samples pos(1). It is the third most frequently detected compound in Ohio River - 2427 of 4972 samples pos, 86% 0.1-1.0 ppb(2). Samples from Zurich, Switzerland lake surface contained 38 ppb, and at a 30 m depth - 65 ppb(3). Results reported in the USEPA STORET database of 9,295 data points, showed that 28.0% were positive for trichloroethylene, 0.10 ppb median(4).
[(1) Ewing BB et al; Monitoring to Detect Previously Unrecognized Pollutants in Surface Waters USEPA-560/6-77-015 p. 74 (1977) (2) Ohio River Valley Water Sanit Comm 190-81 Assessment of Water Quality Conditions (1982) (3) Grob K, Grob G; J Chromatogr 90: 303-13 (1974) (4) Staples CA et al; Environ Toxicol Chem 4: 131-42 (1985)]**PEER REVIEWED**

SURFACE WATER: Trichloroethylene was present in water samples from Jackfish Bay, Lake Superior, at concns from 4.1 to 120 ng/l; Jackfish Bay receives 94,000 cu m/d of bleached-kraft mill effluent(1). Estuarine waters containing trichloroethylene were collected from sites in the UK (Humber, <10-40.6 ng/l; Tees, <10-269; Tyne, <10-43.7; Wear, <10-132; Tweed, <10; Mersey, 250-4200), The Netherlands/Belgium (Scheldt in 1987-1989, <10-1570; Scheldt in 1993, 54.7), Germany (Elbe, <700), and the US (Back River, <132-30,000 and 260-13800; Brazos river, 6-280)(2). Seawaters (beach, bay, fjord, coastal and shelf seawaters) containing trichloroethylene were collected from the following sites: Liverpool Bay, UK (<3600 ng/l), Swansea Bay, UK (<10), Byfjorden, Sweden(0.28 ng/l), Skagerrak (<2.6 to <5.8), Firth of Forth, UK (<10), Moray Forth, UK(<10), North Minch, UK (<10), Bristol Channel, UK (<10), Belgian continental shelf (4.9- 7.3)(2). Open seawaters containing trichloroethylene were collected from the following sites: the NE Atlantic Ocean (5-11 ng/l), Antarctica in 1990 (3.8 ng/l), Sea of Japan in 1991 (<10 ng/l), and the East Pacific Ocean in 1981 (0.1 to 0.7 ng/l)(2). Trichloroethylene was measured in two sites in the River Elbe near Hamburg in 1992/1993; at Zollenspieker, upstream of Hamburg, concns ranged from 20-132 ng/l (median=57 ng/l) and at Seemannshoft, downstream of Hamburg, concns ranged from 13-117 ng/l (median=39 ng/l)(3). Trichloroethylene was found in water samples collected from 30 sites within the urban rivers and estuaries of Osaka, Japan; a median concn of 0.39 ug/l (78 of 136 samples positive, range=0.31-45 ug/l) was reported(4). The average concn of trichloroethylene in marine water samples was 0.3 ppb, max 3.6 ppb(6). A mean concn of 14.93 ng/l was reported for trichloroethylene based on data collected in the southern North Sea from Sept 1994 to December 1995(5).
[(1) Comba ME et al; Environ Toxicol Chem 13: 1065-74 (1994) (2) Dewulf J, Van Langenhove H; Wat Res 31: 1825-38 (1997) (3) Gotz R et al; Chemosphere 36: 2085-2101 (1998) (4) Yamamoto K et al; Environ Pollut 95: 135-43 (1997) (5) Dewulf JP et al; Environ Sci Technol 32: 903-911 (1998) (6) Dyksen JE, Hess AF III; J Amer Water Work Assoc 394-403 (1982)]**PEER REVIEWED**

RAIN/SNOW/FOG: Concns of trichloroethylene in rainwater from La Jolla, California cnotained 5 parts/trillion, and from an industrial area in England 150 parts/trillion(4). Samples from 7 rain events in Portland, OR, Feb-Apr 1984 showed were 100% pos, concns ranging from 0.78-16 parts/trillion, 5.6 avg(5). 117 rain samples collected over 1991 in Kobe, Japan contained unmeasurable concns of trichloroethylene (<0.001 mg/l)(1). Cloud water samples were collected during 1987 and 1988 at Mt. Mitchell State Park, NC; concns of trichloroethylene ranged from 0-6.7 ng/ml with an average concn of 1.38 ng/ml(2). Surface snow, snow collected from 0.5 m depth and surface ice sampled in the Terranova Bay area in Antarctica, 1991-1992, contained trichloroethylene at 14, 8.5, and 11 ng/l, respectively(3). Snow collected from a snow pit at 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0 m contained trichloroethylene at concns of 5.7, 2.9, 8.3, 8.9, 3.9, 8.0, and 9.0 ng /l, respectively (Terranova Bay area, Antarctica, 1992-1993)(3). Snow samples from Southern California contained 30 parts/trillion, central California 1.5 parts/trillion, and Alaska 39 parts/trillion(4).
[(1) Adachi A, Kobayashi T; Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 52: 9-12 (1994) (2) Aneja VP; J Air Waste Manage Assoc 43: 1239-44 (1993) (3) Zoccolillo L et al; Intern J Environ Anal Chem 63: 91-98 (1996) (4) SU C, Goldberg ED; Mar Pollut Transfer 1976: 353-74 (1976) (5) Ligocki MP et al; Atmos Environ 19: 1609-17 (1985)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Effluent Concentrations:

Landfill gas at seven U.K. waste disposal sites contained trichloroethylene at <0.1 (4 sites) to 152 mg/cu m(1). Gas samples from 3 old and 1 active municipal landfills in Southern Finland contained trichloroethylene at average concns of 0.1 to 5.25 mg/cu m and a maximum concn of 13 mg/cu m(2). Average trichloroethylene concns of 710 and 2079 ppbV were measured in samples of landfill gas(3). 6% of urban runoff samples (n=86) from 4 of 19 different cities contained trichloroethylene at concns from 0.3 to 10 ug/l(4). Emissions of trichloroethylene from hazardous waste incinerators in the US were estimated as 81.8 ng/l or 0.7 tons/yr(5). Primary sludge from seven US publicly owned treatment works contained trichloroethylene at 35-284 ug/l(6). Stationary source emissions of 2640 tons/yr trichloroethylene were reported for The Netherlands in 1980(7). Landfill gas from 6 abandoned hazardous waste sites and 1 sanitary landfill contained trichloroethylene at mean concns of 0.08 to 2.43 ppbV and an overall maximum value of 12.3 ppbV(8). Emissions from a municipal waste incineration plant contained trichloroethylene at 4.0 ug/cu m(9). Bleaching effluent from 3 different kraft pulp mills in Finland contained trichloroethylene at concns of 0.1 to 0.7 ug/l(10). Trichloroethylene has been identified in spent chlorination and alkali extraction liquors from pulp bleaching(11). Effluent from 4 wastewater treatment plants in the Great Lakes basin contained trichloroethylene at concns of <1 to 1 ppb(12). Trichloroethylene was reported in the flue gas from the combustion of pulverized coal at minimum and maximum concns of 4.747X10-7 and 5.685X10-7 lb/10+6 Btu, respectively(13). The combustion of waste plastics containing vinyl chloride polymer in an incinerator resulted in concns of trichloroethylene in the exhaust gas of 47-82 ug/cu m, depending on the combustion and exit chamber temperatures(14). Concn of trichloroethylene in sewage sludge generally ranges from 1 to 10 mg/kg dry weight(15). Pyrolysis of military HC smokepots resulted in the production of trichloroethylene(16). Leachate samples from 5 hazardous waste landfills and 4 sanitary landfills contained trichloroethylene at concns of 30 to 9500 ug/l and 2.3 to 7.9 ug/l, respectively(17). Emissions from coal-fired power stations contained trichloroethylene at concns of 5.7 ug/N-cu m; the concn in coal is 0.02 ug/g(18). Diesel engines are reported to emit 4.5 ug/N-cu m(18).
[(1) Allen MR et al; Environ Sci Technol 31: 1054-61 (1997) (2) Assmuth T, Kalevi K; Chemosphere 24: 1207-16 (1992) (3) Brosseau J, Heitz M; Atmos Environ 28: 285-93 (1994) (4) Cole RH et al; J WPCF 56: 898-908 (1984) (5) Dempsey CR; J Air Waste Manage Assoc 43: 1374-79 (1993) (6) Feiler HD et al; pp. 53-7 in Natl Conf Munic Ind Sludge Util Disposal. Silver Springs, MD: Inf Transfer (1980) (7) Guicherit R, Schulting FL; Sci Total Environ 43: 193- 219 (1985) (8) Harkov R et al; J Environ Sci Health A20: 491-501 (1985) (9) Jay K, Steiglitz L; Chemosphere 30: 1249-60 (1995) (10) Juuit S et al; Chemosphere 33: 2431-40 (1996) (11) Kringstad KP, Lindstrom K; Environ Sci Technol 18: 236A-48A (1984) (12) Michael LC et al; Environ Sci Technol 25: 150-55 (1991) (13) Miller CA et al; Environ Sci Technol 28: 1150-58 (1994) (14) Nishikawa H et al; Chemosphere 25: 1953-60 (1992) (15) O'Connor GA; Sci Total Environ 185: 71-81 (1996) (16) Schaeffer DJ et al; J Hazard Mater 17: 315-28 (1988) (17) Foerst C et al; Intern J Environ Anal Chem 37: 287-93 (1989) (18) Garcia JP et al; Atmos Environ 26A: 1589-97 (1992)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Trichloroethylene was detected not quantified in wastewater in vicinity of a specialty chemicals plant(1). Industries with mean trichloroethylene concns greater than 75 ppb: paint and ink formulation, electrical/electronic components, and rubber processing mean range, 7-530 ppb, max range 3-1600 ppb(2). Concn results of trichloroethylene reported in the USEPA STORET database are as follows: 1,480 data points, 19.6% pos, 5.0 ppb median(3). Groundwater samples at 178 CERCLA hazardous waste disposal sites were 51.3% pos(4). Trichloroethylene was detected in MN municipal solid waste landfills: leachates from 6 sites, 83.3% pos, 0.7-125 ppb; contaminated groundwater (by inorganic indices), 13 sites, 69.2% pos, 0.2-144 ppb; other groundwater (apparently not contaminated as indicated by inorganic indices), 7 sites, 28.6% pos, 0.2-6.8 ppb(5).
[(1) Hites RA et al; ACS Symp Ser 94: 63-90 (1979) (2) USEPA; Treatability Manual pp. I.12.23-3 USEPA-600/2-82-001A (1981) (3) Staples CA et al; Environ Toxicol Chem 4: 131-42 (1985) (4) Plumb RH Jr; Groundwater Monit Rev 7: 94-100 (1987) (5) Sabel GV, Clark TP; Waste Manag Res 2: 119-30 (1984)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Off-gas from a conventional activated sludge treatment facility contained trichloroethylene at average concns of 175, 86, and 242 mg/cu m for three different weeks of operation in 1995/1996 (1). Trichloroethylene represented 1.1% of the total mass distribution of different species emitted in 1990 from the United Kingdom(2). Influent and effluent samples collected from the 14 water pollution control plants (11 with full secondary treatment)in New York city between 1989 and 1993 contained trichloroethylene at concn ranges of 1 to 46 ug /l (27% positive, n=84) and 2 to 3 ug /l (7% positive, n=84), respectively(3). Groundwater samples collected from beneath an active landfill in Orange County, Florida, in 1989/1990 and 1992/1993 contained trichloroethylene at concns ranging from below detection to 9.21 ug/l and 0.09 to 0.54 ug/l, respectively(4). 30 of 49 Superfund sites citing municipal well contamination, distributed in 21 US states, contained trichloroethylene in groundwater samples(5). Emissions of trichloroethylene from wastewater treatment plants in Los Angeles, CA were 366, 12, 3, and 5 kg/yr for Hyperion, Terminal Island, Tillman, and LA-Glendale plants, respectively(6). Trichloroethylene was emitted during coal combustion at concns ranging from 4.747X10-7 to 5.685X10-7 lb/10+6 Btu(7). Concns of trichloroethylene in municipal landfill leachate ranged from 1 to 15 mg /l; concns in landfill gases ranged from 1.2 to 175 mg/cu m (median 0.66 mg/cu m)(8). Trichloroethylene was emitted from 8 municipal solid waste composting facilities at a maximum concn of 1300 ug/cu m; fresh, mid-aged, old, and curing compost contained trichloroethylene at average concns of 98, 3, 3, and 2 ug/cu m, respectively(9). Global atmospheric emission fluxes of trichloroethylene were reported in 1988 to 1992; values ranged from 197 to 241 kt/year(10).
[(1) Zhu H et al; J Air Waste Manage Assoc 49: 434-43 (1999) (2) Derwent RG; in Volatile Org Compds in the Atmos. Hester RE, Harrison RM, eds. Cambridge, UK: Royal Soc Chem. Issues Environ Sci Technol 4: 1-15 (1995) (3) Stubin AI et al; Water Environ Res 68: 1037-44 (1996) (4) Chen SC, Zoltek J; Chemosphere 31: 3455-64 (1995) (5) Canter LW, Sabatini DA; Intern J Environ Studies 46: 35-57 (1994) (6) Mayer GJ et al; Wat Environ Res 66: 140-44 (1994) (7) Miller CA et al; Environ Sci Technol 28: 1150-58 (1994) (8) Roy WR; pp. 411-46 in Contam Groundwaters. Adriano DC et al, eds. Northwood, UK: Sci Rev (1994) (9) Eitzer BD; Environ Sci Technol 29: 896-902 (1995) (10) Sidebottom H, Franklin J; Pure Appl Chem 68: 1757-69 (1996)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Sediment/Soil Concentrations:

SEDIMENT: Trichloroethylene was not detected in sediment in the vicinity of a specialty chemicals plant(1). The compound was detected in marine sediments from Liverpool Bay, England at a max of 9.9 ppb(2). It has been reported in the USEPA STORET database, based on 338 data points where 6.0% were reported positive, at <5.0 ppb median concn(3). Trichloroethylene was detected in sediment from Lake Pontchartrain at Passes; from 3 sites, 66.7% were positive at a concn of 0.1-0.2 ppb, wet weight(4).
[(1) Hites RA et al; ACS Symp Ser 94: 63-90 (1979) (2) Pearson CR, McConnell G; Proc Roy Soc Lond B 189: 305-32 (1975) (3) Staples CA et al; Environ Total Chem 4: 131-42 (1985) (4) Ferrario JB et al; Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 34: 246-55 (1985)]**PEER REVIEWED**

SOIL: Average concns of trichloroethylene in a pine and agricultural soil ranged from 0.08 to 0.8 and <0.01 to 0.06 ug/kg dry weight, respectively(1).
[(1) Hoekstra EJ et al; Chemosphere 38: 2875-83 (1999)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Atmospheric Concentrations:

Global concn of trichloroethylene has been reported as follows: avg 8 parts/trillion, Northern hemisphere 15-16 parts/trillion, Southern hemisphere <3 parts/trillion(1,2). Concns in major USA cities have been reported at a mean concn of 96-483 parts/trillion, with a max of 236-3097 parts/trillion, and a min of 5-36 parts/trillion(3,4). Sampling studies conducted in Portland, OR, from Feb-Apr 1984, showed a concn in air (ng/cu m) during 7 rain envents as follows: 100% pos, 240-3900, 1537 avg(11). Industrial area concns have been reported at a 1.2 ppb mean; urban/suburban- 0.25 ppb mean, and rural- trace-0.10 ppb(5-7). Results from a study based in England are as follows: industrial 40-60 ppb, suburban 1-20 ppb, rural 5 ppb(8). Air samples taken from the Love Canal region, Niagara Falls, NY resulted in 2 of 3 samples being pos (1.6 and 3.4 ppb), and home basement levels estimated at 0.83 ppb(9). Waste disposal site in Edison, NJ showed trichloroethylene concns ranging from a trace-61 ppb(10).
[(1) Singh HB et al; Atmospheric Distributions, Sources and Sinks of Selected Hydrocarbons, Halocarbons, SF6 and NO2 USEPA-600/3-79-107 p. 4 (1979) (2) Cox RA et al; Atmos Environ 10: 305-8 (1976) (3) Singh HB et al; Atmos Environ 15: 601-12 (1981) (4) Singh HB et al; Environ Sci Technol 16: 872-80 (1982) (5) Bozzelli JW, Kebbekus BB; J Environ Sci Health 17: 693-13 (1982) (6) Grimsrud EP, Rasmussen RA; Atmos Environ 9: 1014-7 (1975) (7) Lillian D et al; Environ Sci Technol 9: 1042-8 (1975) (8) Pearson CR, McConnell G; Proc R Soc Lond B 189: 305-32 (1975) (9) Barkley J et al; Biomed Mass Spectrom 7: 139-47 (1980) (10) Pellizzari ED; Environ Sci Technol 16: 781-5 (1982) (11) Ligocki MP et al; Atmos Environ 19: 1609-17 (1985)]**PEER REVIEWED**

URBAN/SUBURBAN: Air samples collected in Bilbao, Spain in March 1996 contained trichloroethylene at a mean concn of 0.7 ppbV(1). 14.6% of air samples collected outside 50 homes in the Los Angeles area contained trichloroethylene(2). Mean concns of 1.0 (n=103) and 2.1 (n=83) ug/cu m were reported in air samples collected from 1986 to 1990 in Southeast Chicago and East St. Louis, respectively(3). Air samples collected as part of the Urban Baseline VOC Measurement Program in the District of Columbia from March 1990 to March 1991 contained trichloroethylene in 66.07% of the samples at a mean concn of 0.33 ppbv (range=0.17-2.83 ppbv)(4). A maximum outdoor air concn of <2 ug/cu m was reported in a study of 300 Dutch homes(5). Trichloroethylene was measured in air samples collected from urban and suburban locations in Chicago at average concns of 0.82-1.16 and 0.52 ug/cu m, respectively(6). The national VOC database, representing 300 cities from 42 states, reports outdoor air samples (n=3021) contained trichloroethylene at average and median concns of 0.495 and 0.158 ppbv, respectively (data reported up to 1985)(7).
[(1) Alonso L et al; J Air Waste Manage Assoc 49: 916-24 (1999) (2) Hartwell TD et al; Atmos Environ 26A: 1519-27 (1992) (3) Sweet CW, Vermette, SJ; Environ Sci Technol 26: 165-73 (1992) (4) Hendler AH, Crow WL; Proc Ann Meet Air Waste Manage Assoc, 85thMeeting, Kansas City, MS, 92-75.05, 94-08743-2-9 (1992) (5) Otson R, Fellin P; pp. 335-421 in Gaseous Pollutants: Characterization and Cycling, Nriagu JO, ed. NY, NY: John Wiley Sons, Inc, Chp 9 (1992) (6) Scheff PA, Wadden RA; Environ Sci Technol 27: 617-25 (1993) (7) Shah JJ, Singh HB; Environ Sci Technol 22: 1381-88 (1988)]**PEER REVIEWED**

URBAN/SUBURBAN: Trichloroethylene was detected in air samples set up by the North Rhine-Westphalia State Centre for Air Quality Control and Noise Abatement (76 stationary stations and 8 mobile monitoring stations); annual average concns in 1990 ranged from 0.17 to 0.62 ug/cu m(1). Air samples collected in Porto Alegre, Brazil from March 1996 to April 1997 contained trichloroethylene at an average concn of 0.367 ppb (range=0.1-1.2 ppb, n=23, 6 samples at detection limit of 0.1 ppb)(2). 32% of air samples collected at 10 different locations in Boston, Chicago, Houston and the Seattle/Tacoma area in 1988/1989 as part of the Toxic Air Monitoring System network contained trichloroethylene at concns greater than 0.10 ppbv(3). Yearly mean concns of trichloroethylene across several Canadian cities in 1990 and in the US were 0.28 (maximum=20 ug/cu m) and 6.0 ug/cu m, respectively(4). Air samples collected between 1994 and 1996 at a site in Phoenix, AZ and at Tucson, AZ contained trichloroethylene at average concns of 0.05 (range 0.00 to 0.26 ppbv) and 0.04 ppbv (range 0.00 to 0.25 ppbv), respectively(5).
[(1) Pfeffer H-U; Sci Total Environ 146/147: 263-73 (1994) (2) Grosjean E et al; Environ Sci Technol 33: 1970-78 (1999) (3) Evans GF et al; J Air Waste Manage Assoc 42: 1319-23 (1992) (4) Bunce NJ, Schneider UA; J Photochem Photobiol A: Chem 81: 93-101 (1994) (5) Zielinska B et al; J Air Waste Manage Assoc 48: 1038-50 (1998)]**PEER REVIEWED**

INDOOR: Indoor air samples, collected from 12 Canadian homes in November/December 1986 contained trichloroethylene at concns from below detection (detection limit not stated) to 2 ug/cu m (average concn of 0.5 ug/cu m, average concn in Feb/March of 1.6 ug/cu m); ambient air collected outside each home contained trichloroethylene at below detection to 2 ug/cu m with an average of 0.2 ug/cu m in November/December and 0.8 in Feb/March(1). A WHO summary of indoor air studies from homes in Italy, The Netherlands, USA, and Germany reported that the average home in these studies contained 5 ug/cu m trichloroethylene(2). 50% of air samples collected from the kitchens of 50 homes in the Los Angeles area contained trichloroethylene(3). Indoor air samples from nonsmoking and smoking homes contained trichloroethylene at mean concns of 1.84 (range of 0.00 to 9.08 ug/cu m) and 0.66 (range of 0.00 to 3.41 ug/cu m) ug/cu m, respectively(4). Air samples collected from a newly constructed office facility in 1987/1988 contained trichloroethylene at concns of 16.4, 7.2, 58.2, and 14.8 ug/cu m at four different sampling events; air samples collected from the roof contained this compound at 0.9 ug/cu m(5). 27% of indoor air samples from 26 "sick" houses contained trichloroethylene at concns ranging from not detected to 4.30 ug/cu m; 50 "normal" houses contained trichloroethylene at mean and median concns of 0.97 and 0.25 ug/cu m (max= 20.38 ug/cu m)(6).
[(1) Chan CC et al; J Air Waste Manage Assoc 40: 62-67 (1990) (2) Crump DR; Issues Environ Sci Technol 4: 109-24 (1995) (3) Hartwell TD et al; Atmos Environ 26A: 1519-27 (1992) (4) Heavner DL et al; Environ Internat 21: 3-21 (1995) (5) Hodgson AT et al; J Air Waste Manage Assoc 41: 1461-68 (1991) (6) Kostiainen R; Atmos Environ 29: 693-700 (1995)]**PEER REVIEWED**

INDOOR AIR: An emission rate of 3.6 ug/sq m/hr was measured for the release of trichloroethylene from linoleum tile(1). A summary of US studies monitoring VOCs in indoor air reports that trichloroethylene has been measured at an average concn of 1.347 ppb in 2134 measurements(1). A maximum indoor air concn of 106 ug/cu m was reported in a study of 300 Dutch homes(1). Trichloroethylene was reported in air samples during a study of West German homes with a concn range of <1.0 to 1200 ug/cu m (mean concn of 13 ug/cu m)(1). Air samples collected from 757 randomly selected Canadian homes in 1992 contained trichloroethylene at unreported concns(2).
[(1) Otson R, Fellin P; pp. 335-421 in Gaseous Pollutants: Characterization and Cycling, Nriagu JO, ed, NY, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, Chp 9 (1992) (2) Otson R; pp. 66-76 in Volatile Organic Compounds in the Environment. Wang W et al, eds. ASTM STP 1261 (1996)]**PEER REVIEWED**

RURAL/REMOTE: Mean concns of trichloroethylene in air samples collected from Talladega National Forest were 0.2 ppb(1). Air samples collected from 4 forests in southwest Germany between 1986 and 1988 contained trichloroethylene at mean concns of 0.45, 0.55, 0.5, and 0.45 ug/cu m(2). A mean concn of 0.6 ug/cu m (n=23) was reported in air samples collected from 1987 to 1990 from a rural site near Champaign, IL(3). Concns of trichloroethylene were measured in air samples collected above the Pacific Ocean (1977, mean=0.07 ug/cu m), Panama Canal Zone (1977, 0.08 ug/cu m), and in the northern hemisphere (1985, 0.06-0.09 ug/cu m) and southern hemisphere (1981, <0.02 ug/cu m). Air samples from rural locations contained trichloroethylene: Badger Pass, CA (1977, mean=0.06 ug/cu m, range=0.005-0.09 ug/cu m), Whiteface Mountains, NY (1974, mean=0.5 ug/cu, range=<0.3-1.9 ug/cu m), Reese River, NV (1977, mean=0.06 ug/cu m, range=0.005-0.09 ug/cu m), Jetmar, KS (1978, mean=0.07 ug/cu m, range=0.04-0.11 ug/cu m)(4). Trichloroethylene was measured in marine air masses surveyed over an area in the western Pacific between 43 deg N, 150 deg E and 4 deg N, 113 deg E in September 1994 at mean and median concns of 3.52 and 0.32 parts/trillion volume, respectively (range=0.03-141.2 parts/trillion volume)(5). Ambient concns of trichloroethylene in air samples from the western Pacific, 1991 to 1994, ranged from 0.36 to 70 parts/trillion volume with mean concns from 3 different cruises of 1.90 to 9.5 parts/trillion volume(6). The national VOC database reports remote and rural median concns of 0.013 (n=14) and 0.010 (n=84) ppbv for trichloroethylene(7).
[(1) Duce RA et al; Rev Geophys Space Physics 21: 921-52 (1983) (2) Frank W, Frank H; Atmos Environ 24A: 1735-39 (1990) (3) Sweet CW, Vermette, SJ; Environ Sci Technol 26: 165-73 (1992) (4) IARC; Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Dry Cleaning, Some Chlorinated Solvents and Other Industrial Chemicals, 63: 86 (1995) (5) Quack B, Suess E; J Geophys Res 104: 1663-78 (1999) (6) Yokouchi Y et al; J Geophys Res. 102: 8805-9 (1997) (7) Shah JJ, Singh HB; Environ Sci Technol 22: 1381-88 (1988)]**PEER REVIEWED**

RURAL/REMOTE: Air samples from the Antarctic from April 1985 to February 1986 contained trichloroethylene at 3.1X10-11 mol/cu m(1). Trichloroethylene concns in Arctic air samples peaked in December and January and declined to almost zero in June/July(2). A mean concn of 141.1 parts/trillion volume was measured for trichloroethylene in the air above the southern North Sea during cruises from Sept 1994 to Dec 1995(3). Air samples collected between 1994 and 1996 at a site in Payson, AZ and at Casa Grande, AZ contained trichloroethylene at avg concns of 0.10 (range 0.00 to 1.13 ppbv) and 0.09 ppbv (range 0.00 to 1.46 ppbv), respectively(4).
[(1) Tulupov PE et al; Meteorol Gidrol 68-72 (1989) (2) Yokouchi Y, Barrie LA; Kankyo Kagaku 5: 506-7 (1995) (3) Dewulf JP et al; Environ Sci Technol 32: 903-911 (1998) (4) Zielinska B et al; J Air Waste Manage Assoc 48: 1038-50 (1998)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Food Survey Values:

Trichloroethylene was detected in the following food samples: intermediates grain-based food (1984): 9 varieties, 44.4% pos, 0.77-2.7 ppb, 1.9 ppb (max concn in yellow corn meal; wheat, corn, oats (1984)), 10, 2, and 1 samples, respectively: not detected(1). Sampling table-ready foods showed trichloroethylene concns as follows: 19 varieties, 47% pos, 1.7-8.0 ppb, 1.5 ppb avg, max concn in plain granola; butter, 7 samples, 100% pos; 1.6-20 ppb, 9.7 ppb avg; margarine, 7 samples, 100% pos, 3.7-980 ppb, 4.3 ppb avg of pos, max concn in Mozzarella cheese(2). Trace amounts of trichloroethylene were detected in extracted edible oils(1). It was also detected in meat, beverages, dairy products, fruits and vegetables, oil and fats, range 0.02-60 ug/kg(1). Concns of trichloroethylene in food samples were as follows: Cheshire cheese: 3 mg/kg; English butter: 10 mg/kg; eggs: 0.6 mg/kg; shin of beef: 16 mg/kg; beef fat: 12 mg/kg; pig liver: 22 mg/kg; margarine: 6 mg/kg; olive oil (Spanish): 9 mg/kg; cod liver oil: 19 mg/kg; vegetable oil for frying: 7 mg/kg; fruit juices: 5 mg/kg; light beer: 0.7 mg/kg; freeze-dried coffee: 4 mg/kg; tea in bags: 60 mg/kg; Yugoslavian wine: 0.02; potatoes: 3 mg/kg; apples: 5 mg/kg; pears: 5 mg/kg; fresh bread: 7 mg/kg(3).
[(1) Heikes DL, Hopper ML; J Assoc Off Anal Chem 69: 990-8 (1986) (2) Heikes DL; J Assoc Off Anal Chem 70: 215-26 (1987) (3) McConnell G et al; Endeavour 34: 13-8 (1975)]**PEER REVIEWED**

5 of 372 samples of food, obtained from the Food and Drug Administration's "market basket" collections, contained trichloroethylene at concns ranging from 2 to 94 ng/g (mean=49 ng/g)(1). Trichloroethylene was present in samples of butter from not detected to 0.3 ug/kg, in margarine at concns from not detected to 0.4 ug/kg, in peanut butter at concns from not detected to 0.7 ug/kg, and in pastry mix at a concn of 0.2 ug/kg(2). Floured chickpeas contained trichloroethylene at unreported concns(3). Trichloroethylene has been reported as a component of chicken meat volatiles(4).
[(1) Daft JL; J Agric Food Chem 37: 560-64 (1989) (2) Page BD, LaCroix GM; J AOAC Internat 78: 1416-28 (1995) (3) Rembold H et al; J Agric Food Chem 37: 659-62 (1989) (4) Shahidi F et al; CRC Crit Rev Food Sci Nature 24: 141-243 (1986)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Plant Concentrations:

Tree cores obtained from bald cypress, tupelo, sweet gum, oak, sycamore, and loblolly pine growing over shallow groundwater contaminated with trichloroethylene contained this compound at concns from <50 to 35,040 nmol /l (n=138, sampled January-February 1998, Savannah River Site, SC)(1).
[(1) Vroblesky DA et al; Environ Sci Technol 33: 510-15 (1999)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Fish/Seafood Concentrations:

Conger conger (eel): gill, gut: 29 ng/g; brain, muscle: 62-70 ng/g; Gaddus morhua (cod): stomach, muscle: 7-8 ng/g; brain, liver: 56-66 ng/g; Pollachius birens (coal fish): muscle: 8 ng/g; alimentary canal: 306 ng/g; Scylliorhinus canicula (dog fish): muscle, gut, brain: 40-41 ng/g; liver: 479 ng/g; Trisopterus luscus (bib): gill: 40 ng/g; muscle, skeletal tissue: 185-187 ng/g.
[Verschueren, K. Handbook of Environmental Data on Organic Chemicals. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1996.1788]**PEER REVIEWED**

Trichloroethylene has been reported in marine fish at the following concns: flesh - 0.04-1.1 ppm, liver - 0.66-20.0 ppb, mussels - 50 day exposure 1.37 ppm(1). Shelfish from Lake Pontachartrain at Passes contained the following concns: oysters, 5 samples, 2.2 ppb avg; clams, composite samples from 2 sites, 5.7 and 0.8 ppb(2).
[(1) Pearson CR, McConnell G; Proc R Soc Lond B 189: 305-32 (1975) (2) Ferrario JB et al; Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 34: 246-55 (1985)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Animal Concentrations:

Clams collected in 1995/1996 from the Ariho, Koe and Okita Rivers, Japan, did not contain measurable quantities of trichloroethylene (detection limit <0.5 ug/kg)(1). Earthworms collected from a forest site adjacent to a former landfill site and chemical plant in West Germany during 1989 contained trichloroethylene at concns below detection (detection limit not reported) to 170 ng/g wet weight(2). In a sampling study conducted near Liverpool Bay, UK, trichloroethylene concns in Alca torda (Razorbill Auk), Uria aalge (Guillemot), and Rissa tridactyla (Kittiwake) sea bird eggs were 23-33 mg/kg. Levels of 2.4 mg/kg for Phalacrocrax aristotelis (Shag) were also noted(3).
[(1) Gotoh M et al; Bull Environ Contam Toxicol, 60: 74-80 (1998) (2) Back H, Susser P; Sol Biol Biochem 24: 1745-48 (1992) (3) Pearson CR, McConnell G; Proc R Soc London Ser B 189: 305-22 (1975)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Milk Concentrations:

Trichloroethylene has been detected in dairy products(1). In mother's milk samples from 4 U.S. urban areas, 8 of 8 samples tested positive for the compound(2). The concn of trichloroethylene in fresh milk was 0.3 mg/kg(3).
[(1) IARC; Monographs of the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Man 11: 283-76 (1976) (2) Pellizzari ED et al; Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 28: 322-8 (1982) (3) McConnell G et al; Endeavour 34: 13-8 (1975)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Other Environmental Concentrations:

Trichloroethylene was found in 2.2% of 1159 household products; automotive products (0.1% weight/weight, 1.2% positive hits in category), household cleaner/polishes (0.0%, 0.9%), paint-related products (3.0%, 1.1%), fabric and leather treatments (0.0%, 2.2%), cleaners for electronic equipment (0.3%, 1.4%), oils, greases and lubricants (0.3%, 1.8%), adhesive-related products (34.7%, 2.6%) and miscellaneous products (33.9%, 14.1%)(1). Household cleaning agents and pesticides contained trichloroethylene at an average concn of 7 ug/cu m (2). Trichloroethylene was identified in 3 of 26 samples of hobby glue at 0.007 to 0.15 weight percent(3). In the European Community, trichloroethylene is used by some producers during the decaffeinating of coffee(4).
[(1) Sack TM et al; Atmos Environ 26A: 1063-70 (1992) (2) Wallace LA et al; Atmos Environ 21: 385-93 (1987) (3) Rastogi SC; Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 51: 501-7 (1993) (4) Passant NR et al; Atmos Environ 27A: 2555-66 (1993)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Environmental Standards & Regulations:

CERCLA Reportable Quantities:

Persons in charge of vessels or facilities are required to notify the National Response Center (NRC) immediately, when there is a release of this designated hazardous substance, in an amount equal to or greater than its reportable quantity of 100 lb or 45.4 kg. The toll free number of the NRC is (800) 424-8802; In the Washington D.C. metropolitan area (202) 426-2675. The rule for determining when notification is required is stated in 40 CFR 302.4 (section IV. D.3.b).
[40 CFR 302.4 (7/1/2000)]**PEER REVIEWED**

RCRA Requirements:

U228; As stipulated in 40 CFR 261.33, when trichloroethylene, as a commercial chemical product or manufacturing chemical intermediate or an off-specification commercial chemical product or a manufacturing chemical intermediate, becomes a waste, it must be managed according to Federal and/or State hazardous waste regulations. Also defined as a hazardous waste is any residue, contaminated soil, water, or other debris resulting from the cleanup of a spill, into water or on dry land, of this waste. Generators of small quantities of this waste may qualify for partial exclusion from hazardous waste regulations (40 CFR 261.5).
[40 CFR 261.33 (7/1/2000)]**PEER REVIEWED**

D040; A solid waste containing trichloroethylene may or may not become characterized as a hazardous waste when subjected to the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure listed in 40 CFR 261.24, and if so characterized, must be managed as a hazardous waste.
[40 CFR 261.24 (7/1/2000)]**PEER REVIEWED**

F002; When trichloroethylene is a spent solvent, it is classified as a hazardous waste from a nonspecific source (F002), as stated in 40 CFR 261.31, and must be managed according to state and/or federal hazardous waste regulations.
[40 CFR 261.31 (7/1/2000)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Atmospheric Standards:

This action promulgates standards of performance for equipment leaks of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) in the Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry (SOCMI). The intended effect of these standards is to require all newly constructed, modified, and reconstructed SOCMI process units to use the best demonstrated system of continuous emission reduction for equipment leaks of VOC, considering costs, non air quality health and environmental impact and energy requirements. Trichloroethylene is produced, as an intermediate or a final product, by process units covered under this subpart.
[40 CFR 60.489 (7/1/2000)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Listed as a hazardous air pollutant (HAP) generally known or suspected to cause serious health problems. The Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990, directs EPA to set standards requiring major sources to sharply reduce routine emissions of toxic pollutants. EPA is required to establish and phase in specific performance based standards for all air emission sources that emit one or more of the listed pollutants. Trichloroethylene is included on this list.
[Clean Air Act as amended in 1990, Sect. 112 (b) (1) Public Law 101-549 Nov. 15, 1990]**PEER REVIEWED**

Clean Water Act Requirements:

Toxic pollutant designated pursuant to section 307(a)(1) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act and is subject to effluent limitations.
[40 CFR 401.15 (7/1/2000)]**QC REVIEWED**

Trichloroethylene is designated as a hazardous substance under section 311(b)(2)(A) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act and further regulated by the Clean Water Act Amendments of 1977 and 1978. These regulations apply to discharges of this substance. This designation includes any isomers and hydrates, as well as any solutions and mixtures containing this substance.
[40 CFR 116.4 (7/1/2000)]**QC REVIEWED**

Federal Drinking Water Standards:

EPA 5 ug/l
[USEPA/Office of Water; Federal-State Toxicology and Risk Analysis Committee (FSTRAC). Summary of State and Federal Drinking Water Standards and Guidelines (11/93)]**QC REVIEWED**

State Drinking Water Standards:

(FL) FLORIDA 3 ug/l
[USEPA/Office of Water; Federal-State Toxicology and Risk Analysis Committee (FSTRAC). Summary of State and Federal Drinking Water Standards and Guidelines (11/93)]**QC REVIEWED**

(NJ) NEW JERSEY 1 ug/l
[USEPA/Office of Water; Federal-State Toxicology and Risk Analysis Committee (FSTRAC). Summary of State and Federal Drinking Water Standards and Guidelines (11/93)]**QC REVIEWED**

State Drinking Water Guidelines:

(AZ) ARIZONA 3.2 ug/l
[USEPA/Office of Water; Federal-State Toxicology and Risk Analysis Committee (FSTRAC). Summary of State and Federal Drinking Water Standards and Guidelines (11/93)]**QC REVIEWED**

(CT) CONNECTICUT 5 ug/l
[USEPA/Office of Water; Federal-State Toxicology and Risk Analysis Committee (FSTRAC). Summary of State and Federal Drinking Water Standards and Guidelines (11/93)]**QC REVIEWED**

(ME) MAINE 5 ug/l
[USEPA/Office of Water; Federal-State Toxicology and Risk Analysis Committee (FSTRAC). Summary of State and Federal Drinking Water Standards and Guidelines (11/93)]**QC REVIEWED**

(MN) MINNESOTA 30 ug/l
[USEPA/Office of Water; Federal-State Toxicology and Risk Analysis Committee (FSTRAC). Summary of State and Federal Drinking Water Standards and Guidelines (11/93)]**QC REVIEWED**

FDA Requirements:

Trichloroethylene is an indirect food additive for use as a component of adhesives.
[21 CFR 175.105 (4/1/2000)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Tolerances are established for residues of trichloroethylene resulting from its use as a solvent in the manufacture of foods as follows: decaffeinated ground coffee 25 ppm; decaffeinated soluble (instant) coffee extract 10 ppm; and spice oleoresins 30 ppm (provided that if residues of other chlorinated solvents are also present, the total of all residues of such solvents in spice oleoresins shall not exceed 30 ppm).
[21 CFR 173.290 (4/1/2000)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Allowable Tolerances:

Tolerances are established for residues of trichloroethylene resulting from its use as a solvent in the manufacture of foods as follows: decaffeinated ground coffee 25 ppm; decaffeinated soluble (instant) coffee extract 10 ppm; and spice oleoresins 30 ppm (provided that if residues of other chlorinated solvents are also present, the total of all residues of such solvents in spice oleoresins shall not exceed 30 ppm).
[21 CFR 173.290 (4/1/2000)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Chemical/Physical Properties:

Molecular Formula:

C2-H-Cl3
**PEER REVIEWED**

Molecular Weight:

131.39
[Lide, D.R. (ed.). CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 79th ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press Inc., 1998-1999. 3-164]**PEER REVIEWED**

Color/Form:

CLEAR, COLORLESS, OR BLUE MOBILE LIQUID
[Osol, A. (ed.). Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences. 16th ed. Easton, Pennsylvania: Mack Publishing Co., 1980.986]**PEER REVIEWED**

Colorless liquid (unless dyed blue).
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997.316]**PEER REVIEWED**

Odor:

Ethereal odor
[Verschueren, K. Handbook of Environmental Data on Organic Chemicals. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1996.1784]**PEER REVIEWED**

Sweet smelling
[Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology. 4th ed. Volumes 1: New York, NY. John Wiley and Sons, 1991-Present.V4 (93) 40]**PEER REVIEWED**

Characteristic odor resembling that of chloroform
[Budavari, S. (ed.). The Merck Index - An Encyclopedia of Chemicals, Drugs, and Biologicals. Whitehouse Station, NJ: Merck and Co., Inc., 1996.1643]**PEER REVIEWED**

Boiling Point:

87.2 deg C
[Lide, D.R. (ed.). CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 79th ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press Inc., 1998-1999. 3-164]**PEER REVIEWED**

Melting Point:

-84.7 deg C
[Lide, D.R. (ed.). CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 79th ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press Inc., 1998-1999. 3-164]**PEER REVIEWED**

Corrosivity:

Non-corrosive
[Sittig, M. Handbook of Toxic and Hazardous Chemicals and Carcinogens, 1985. 2nd ed. Park Ridge, NJ: Noyes Data Corporation, 1985.883]**PEER REVIEWED**

Critical Temperature & Pressure:

Critical temperature: 300.2 deg C; Critical pressure: 4.986 MPa
[Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology. 4th ed. Volumes 1: New York, NY. John Wiley and Sons, 1991-Present.V6 (93) 42]**PEER REVIEWED**

Density/Specific Gravity:

1.4642 @ 20 deg C/4 deg C
[Budavari, S. (ed.). The Merck Index - An Encyclopedia of Chemicals, Drugs, and Biologicals. Whitehouse Station, NJ: Merck and Co., Inc., 1996.1643]**PEER REVIEWED**

Heat of Combustion:

-6.56 kJ/g
[Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology. 4th ed. Volumes 1: New York, NY. John Wiley and Sons, 1991-Present.V6 (93) 42]**PEER REVIEWED**

Heat of Vaporization:

8,314.7 gcal/gmole
[Weast, R.C. (ed.) Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 67th ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Inc., 1986-87.C-671]**PEER REVIEWED**

Octanol/Water Partition Coefficient:

log Kow= 2.61
[Hansch, C., Leo, A., D. Hoekman. Exploring QSAR - Hydrophobic, Electronic, and Steric Constants. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society., 1995.4]**PEER REVIEWED**

Solubilities:

Soluble in ethanol, diethyl ether, acetone, and chloroform
[IARC. Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Man. Geneva: World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1972-PRESENT. (Multivolume work).V63 (95) 75]**PEER REVIEWED**

Miscible in oil.
[Health and Safety Executive Monograph: Trichloroethylene #6 p.2 (1982)]**PEER REVIEWED**

In water, 1,280 mg/l @ 25 deg C
[Horvath AL et al; J Phys Chem Ref Data 28: 449 (1999)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Spectral Properties:

SADTLER REF NUMBER: 185 (IR, PRISM); MAX ABSORPTION: LESS THAN 200 NM (VAPOR)
[Weast, R.C. (ed.). Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 60th ed. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press Inc., 1979.C-298]**PEER REVIEWED**

Index of refraction: 1.4773 @ 20 deg C/D
[Lide, D.R. (ed.). CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 79th ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press Inc., 1998-1999. 3-164]**PEER REVIEWED**

IR: 62 (Sadtler Research Laboratories IR Grating Collection)
[Weast, R.C. and M.J. Astle. CRC Handbook of Data on Organic Compounds. Volumes I and II. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press Inc. 1985.V1 627]**PEER REVIEWED**

NMR: 9266 (Sadtler Research Laboratories Spectral Collection)
[Weast, R.C. and M.J. Astle. CRC Handbook of Data on Organic Compounds. Volumes I and II. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press Inc. 1985.V1 627]**PEER REVIEWED**

MASS: 583 (Atlas of Mass Spectral Data, John Wiley & Sons, New York)
[Weast, R.C. and M.J. Astle. CRC Handbook of Data on Organic Compounds. Volumes I and II. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press Inc. 1985.V1 627]**PEER REVIEWED**

Intense mass spectral peaks: 60 m/z, 95 m/z, 130 m/z
[Pfleger, K., H. Maurer and A. Weber. Mass Spectral and GC Data of Drugs, Poisons and their Metabolites. Parts I and II. Mass Spectra Indexes. Weinheim, Federal Republic of Germany. 1985.167]**PEER REVIEWED**

Surface Tension:

29.3 dynes/cm = 0.0293 N/m at 20 deg C
[U.S. Coast Guard, Department of Transportation. CHRIS - Hazardous Chemical Data. Volume II. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1984-5.]**PEER REVIEWED**

Vapor Density:

4.53 /Air=1/
[Budavari, S. (ed.). The Merck Index - An Encyclopedia of Chemicals, Drugs, and Biologicals. Whitehouse Station, NJ: Merck and Co., Inc., 1996.1643]**PEER REVIEWED**

Vapor Pressure:

69 mm Hg @ 25 deg C
[Boublik, T., Fried, V., and Hala, E., The Vapour Pressures of Pure Substances. Second Revised Edition. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1984.87]**PEER REVIEWED**

Viscosity:

0.00550 poise at 25 deg C
[Flick, E.W. Industrial Solvents Handbook. 3rd ed. Park Ridge, NJ: Noyes Publications, 1985.143]**PEER REVIEWED**

Other Chemical/Physical Properties:

Percent in saturated air: 10.2 (25 DEG C); Equivalencies: 1 mg/l= 185.8 ppm and 1 ppm= 5.38 mg/cu m @ 25 deg C, 760 mm Hg)
[Clayton, G.D., F.E. Clayton (eds.) Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology. Volumes 2A, 2B, 2C, 2D, 2E, 2F: Toxicology. 4th ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1993-1994.4194]**PEER REVIEWED**

Ratio of Specific Heats of Vapor (gas) : 1.116
[U.S. Coast Guard, Department of Transportation. CHRIS - Hazardous Chemical Data. Volume II. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1984-5.]**PEER REVIEWED**

Olive oil/water partition coefficient 522:1 at 37 deg C.
[Sato A, Nakajima T; Arch Envir Health 43: 69-75 (1979) as cited in USEPA; Health Assessment Document: Trichloroethylene (Draft) p. 3-3 (1983) EPA-600/8-82-006B]**PEER REVIEWED**

Liquid heat capacity: 0.231 Btu/lb-F; saturated vapor pressure: 1.166 lb/sq in; saturated vapor density: 0.02695 lb/cu ft (all at 70 deg F)
[U.S. Coast Guard, Department of Transportation. CHRIS - Hazardous Chemical Data. Volume II. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1984-5.]**PEER REVIEWED**

Saturated liquid density: 90.770 lb/cu ft; ideal gas heat capacity: 0.146 Btu/lb-F (All at 75 deg F)
[U.S. Coast Guard, Department of Transportation. CHRIS - Hazardous Chemical Data. Volume II. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1984-5.]**PEER REVIEWED**

Weight per gallon @ 20 deg C: 12.20 lb.
[Flick, E.W. Industrial Solvents Handbook. 3rd ed. Park Ridge, NJ: Noyes Publications, 1985.143]**PEER REVIEWED**

Partition coefficients at 37 deg C for trichloroethylene into blood = 9.5; into oil = 718.
[Sato A, Nakajima T; Scand J Work Environ Health 13: 81-93 (1987)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Dielectric constant: @ 16 deg C 3.42; coefficient of cubic expansion: 0.00119 (at 0-40 deg C); heat of formation: -42.3 kJ/mol (liquid), -7.78 kJ/mol (vapor); latent heat of vaporization: 238 kJ/kg (at boiling point)
[Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology. 4th ed. Volumes 1: New York, NY. John Wiley and Sons, 1991-Present.V6 (93) 42]**PEER REVIEWED**

Henry's Law Constant=9.85X10-3 atm-cu m/mol @ 25 deg C
[Leighton DT Jr, Calo JM; J Chem Eng Data 26: 382-85 (1981)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Hydroxyl radical rate constant = 2.36X10-12 cu cm/molecule-sec at 25 deg C
[Atkinson R; J Phys Chem Ref Data Monograph No. 2 (1994)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Slowly dec (with formation of HCl) by light in the presence of moisture
[Budavari, S. (ed.). The Merck Index - An Encyclopedia of Chemicals, Drugs, and Biologicals. Whitehouse Station, NJ: Merck and Co., Inc., 1996.1643]**PEER REVIEWED**

Will not attack the common metals even in the presence of moisture
[Lewis, R.J., Sr (Ed.). Hawley's Condensed Chemical Dictionary. 13th ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1997. 1125]**PEER REVIEWED**

Photo-oxidized in air by sunlight (half-time, five days) giving phosgene and dichloroacetyl chloride
[IARC. Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Man. Geneva: World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1972-PRESENT. (Multivolume work).V63 (95) 76]**PEER REVIEWED**

Chemical Safety & Handling:

 

Hazards Summary:

Trichloroethylene (TCE) is a hazardous substance due primarily to its toxicity. Effects result from both high-level, acute and lower-level, chronic exposures. Protection must be afforded against both dermal contact and inhalation. Dermal protection is accomplished by routinely wearing neoprene constructed gloves, worksuit, apron, and shoes. Safety goggles or a face shield is necessary to protect against splash potential. The TLV for TCE is 50 ppm with a short term exposure limit (STEL) of 200 ppm. These levels should be attained through local exhaust (pressure/vacuum) ventilation. If the STEL is exceeded, an organic vapor-acid canister respirator or air-supplied, self-contained breathing apparatus (in emergencies) is recommended. The ethereal, chloroform-like odor of TCE is detectable at 50 ppm, with levels above 200 ppm becoming disagreeable. Its clear, colorless appearance and liquid form do not serve similarly as warnings against dermal contact. The potential fire hazard from TCE alone is low. However, TCE, when exposed to flames or an electric arc in the presence of iron, copper, zinc, or aluminum, can form phosgene, a highly toxic gas. Also, TCE in the presence of heat and strong oxidizers (eg, tetraoxide) reacts violently. Even without a heat source, TCE can react with strong alkali (eg, sodium hydroxide) to form the dangerously toxic, flammable and explosive dichloroacetylene. Perchloric acid also reacts violently with TCE. Further TCE forms impact-explosive mixtures with finely divided aluminum, beryllium, lithium, magnesium or titanium. TCE should be packaged in steel drums. These drums should be stored in a cool, dry, well-ventilated area because TCE will slowly decompose to corrosive HCL when exposed to light & moisture. Should a TCE fire occur, it may be combated with water, fog, dry chemical, carbon dioxide or foam extinguisher. Spills of TCE should be isolated by flushing with water to an impoundment. Density stratification will cause the formation of a bottom TCE layer which can be pumped and containerized.
**PEER REVIEWED**

DOT Emergency Guidelines:

Health: Vapors may cause dizziness or suffocation. Exposure in an enclosed area may be very harmful. Contact may irritate or burn skin and eyes. Fire may produce irritating and/or toxic gases. Runoff from fire control or dilution water may cause pollution.
[U.S. Department of Transportation. 2000 Emergency Response Guidebook. RSPA P 5800.8 Edition. Washington, D.C: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2000,p. G-160]**QC REVIEWED**

Fire or explosion: Some of these materials may burn, but none ignite readily. Most vapors are heavier than air. Air/vapor mixtures may explode when ignited. Container may explode in heat of fire.
[U.S. Department of Transportation. 2000 Emergency Response Guidebook. RSPA P 5800.8 Edition. Washington, D.C: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2000,p. G-160]**QC REVIEWED**

Public safety: CALL Emergency Response Telephone Number ... . Isolate spill or leak area immediately for at least 25 to 50 meters (80 to 160 feet) in all directions. Keep unauthorized personnel away. Stay upwind. Many gases are heavier than air and will spread along ground and collect in low or confined areas (sewers, basements, tanks). Keep out of low areas. Ventilate closed spaces before entering.
[U.S. Department of Transportation. 2000 Emergency Response Guidebook. RSPA P 5800.8 Edition. Washington, D.C: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2000,p. G-160]**QC REVIEWED**

Protective clothing: Wear positive pressure self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA). Structural firefighters' protective clothing will only provide limited protection.
[U.S. Department of Transportation. 2000 Emergency Response Guidebook. RSPA P 5800.8 Edition. Washington, D.C: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2000,p. G-160]**QC REVIEWED**

Evacuation: ... Fire: If tank, rail car or tank truck is involved in a fire, ISOLATE for 800 meters (1/2 mile) in all directions; also, consider initial evacuation for 800 meters (1/2 mile) in all directions.
[U.S. Department of Transportation. 2000 Emergency Response Guidebook. RSPA P 5800.8 Edition. Washington, D.C: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2000,p. G-160]**QC REVIEWED**

Fire: Small fires: Dry chemical, CO2 or water spray. Large fires: Dry chemical, CO2, alcohol-resistant foam or water spray. Move containers from fire area if you can do it without risk. Dike fire control water for later disposal; do not scatter the material. Fire involving tanks or car/trailer loads: Fight fire from maximum distance or use unmanned hose holders or monitor nozzles. Cool containers with flooding quantities of water until well after fire is out. Withdraw immediately in case of rising sound from venting safety devices or discoloration of tank. ALWAYS stay away from tanks engulfed in fire.
[U.S. Department of Transportation. 2000 Emergency Response Guidebook. RSPA P 5800.8 Edition. Washington, D.C: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2000,p. G-160]**QC REVIEWED**

Spill or leak: Eliminate all ignition sources (no smoking, flares, sparks or flames in immediate area). Stop leak if you can do it without risk. Small liquid spills: Take up with sand, earth or other noncombustible absorbent material. Large spills: Dike far ahead of liquid spill for later disposal. Prevent entry into waterways, sewers, basements or confined areas.
[U.S. Department of Transportation. 2000 Emergency Response Guidebook. RSPA P 5800.8 Edition. Washington, D.C: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2000,p. G-160]**QC REVIEWED**

First aid: Move victim to fresh air. Call 911 or emergency medical service. Apply artificial respiration if victim is not breathing. Administer oxygen if breathing is difficult. Remove and isolate contaminated clothing and shoes. In case of contact with substance, immediately flush skin or eyes with running water for at least 20 minutes. For minor skin contact, avoid spreading material on unaffected skin. Wash skin with soap and water. Keep victim warm and quiet. Ensure that medical personnel are aware of the material(s) involved, and take precautions to protect themselves.
[U.S. Department of Transportation. 2000 Emergency Response Guidebook. RSPA P 5800.8 Edition. Washington, D.C: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2000,p. G-160]**QC REVIEWED**

Odor Threshold:

10 mg/l (in water) /Purity not specified/
[Verschueren, K. Handbook of Environmental Data of Organic Chemicals. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1983.1133]**PEER REVIEWED**

5.00X10-1 mg/l (liquid) (detection in water)
[Fazzalari, F.A. (ed.). Compilation of Odor and Taste Threshold Values Data. ASTM Data Series DS 48A (Committee E-18). Philadelphia, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials, 1978.159]**PEER REVIEWED**

2.14X10+1 ppm (recognition in air) (chemically pure)
[Fazzalari, F.A. (ed.). Compilation of Odor and Taste Threshold Values Data. ASTM Data Series DS 48A (Committee E-18). Philadelphia, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials, 1978.159]**PEER REVIEWED**

Skin, Eye and Respiratory Irritations:

Exposure to trichloroethylene vapor may cause irritation of the eyes, nose, and throat.
[Sittig, M. Handbook of Toxic and Hazardous Chemicals and Carcinogens, 1985. 2nd ed. Park Ridge, NJ: Noyes Data Corporation, 1985.884]**PEER REVIEWED**

Liquid: irritating to skin and eyes.
[U.S. Coast Guard, Department of Transportation. CHRIS - Hazardous Chemical Data. Volume II. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1984-5.]**PEER REVIEWED**

Fire Potential:

FIRE HAZARD: LOW, WHEN EXPOSED TO HEAT. HIGH CONCN OF TRICHLOROETHYLENE VAPOR IN HIGH TEMP AIR CAN BE MADE TO BURN MILDLY IF APPLIED WITH STRONG FLAME. THOUGH SUCH CONDITION IS DIFFICULT TO PRODUCE, FLAMES OR ARCS SHOULD NOT BE USED IN CLOSED EQUIPMENT WHICH CONTAINS ANY SOLVENT RESIDUE OR VAPOR.
[Sax, N.I. Dangerous Properties of Industrial Materials. 6th ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1984.2622]**PEER REVIEWED**

At normal handling temperatures, trichloroethylene behaves as a non-flammable, non-burnable substance.
[WHO; Environ Health Criteria 50: Trichloroethylene p.31 (1985)]**PEER REVIEWED**

NFPA Hazard Classification:

Health: 2. 2= Materials that, on intense or continued (but not chronic) exposure, could cause temporary incapacitation or possible residual injury, including those requiring the use of respiratory protective equipment that has an independent air supply. These materials are hazardous to health, but areas may be entered freely if personnel are provided with full-face mask self-contained breathing apparatus that provides complete eye protection.
[Fire Protection Guide to Hazardous Materials. 12 ed. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association, 1997. 325-88]**PEER REVIEWED**

Flammability: 1. 1= This degree includes materials that must be preheated before ignition will occur, such as Class IIIB combustible liquids and solids and semi-solids whose flash point exceeds 200 deg F (93.4 deg C), as well as most ordinary combustible materials. Water may cause frothing if it sinks below the surface of the burning liquid and turns to steam. However, a water fog that is gently applied to the surface of the liquid will cause frothing that will extinguish the fire.
[Fire Protection Guide to Hazardous Materials. 12 ed. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association, 1997. 325-88]**PEER REVIEWED**

Reactivity: 0. 0= This degree includes materials that are normally stable, even under fire exposure conditions, and that do not react with water. Normal fire fighting procedures may be used.
[Fire Protection Guide to Hazardous Materials. 12 ed. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association, 1997. 325-88]**PEER REVIEWED**

Flammable Limits:

Lower flammable limit: 8% by volume at 25 deg C; Upper flammable limit: 10.5% by volume at 25 deg C
[Fire Protection Guide to Hazardous Materials. 12 ed. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association, 1997. 325-88]**PEER REVIEWED**

Lower flammable limit: 7.8% by volume at 100 deg C; Upper flammable limit: 52% by volume at 100 deg C
[Fire Protection Guide to Hazardous Materials. 12 ed. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association, 1997. 325-88]**PEER REVIEWED**

Autoignition Temperature:

420 DEG C (788 DEG F)
[Fire Protection Guide to Hazardous Materials. 12 ed. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association, 1997. 325-88]**PEER REVIEWED**

Fire Fighting Procedures:

Approach fire from upwind to avoid hazardous vapors and toxic decomposition products. Use water spray to keep fire-exposed containers cool. Use water spray, dry chemical, foam, or carbon dioxide. Extinguish fire using agent suitable for surrounding fire.
[Fire Protection Guide to Hazardous Materials. 12 ed. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association, 1997. 49-130]**PEER REVIEWED**

If material involved in fire: Extinguish fire using agent suitable for type of surrounding fire. (Material itself does not burn or burns with difficulty.)
[Association of American Railroads. Emergency Handling of Hazardous Materials in Surface Transportation. Washington, DC: Association of American Railroads, Bureau of Explosives, 1994.1073]**PEER REVIEWED**

Toxic Combustion Products:

Combustion may produce irritants and toxic gas including hydrogen chloride.
[Fire Protection Guide to Hazardous Materials. 12 ed. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association, 1997. 49-130]**PEER REVIEWED**

Explosive Limits & Potential:

UPPER (77 DEG F) 10.5% VOL; LOWER (77 DEG F) 8% VOL
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997.316]**PEER REVIEWED**

UPPER 90% VOL; LOWER 12.5% VOL
[Sax, N.I. Dangerous Properties of Industrial Materials. 6th ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1984.2622]**PEER REVIEWED**

... Under ordinary conditions of use, trichloroethylene is non-flammable and non-explosive... .
[International Labour Office. Encyclopaedia of Occupational Health and Safety. 4th edition, Volumes 1-4 1998. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Office, 1998.104.244]**PEER REVIEWED**

Hazardous Reactivities & Incompatibilities:

Strong caustics and alkalis; chemically-active metals (such as barium, lithium, sodium, magnesium, titanium, and berylium).
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997.316]**PEER REVIEWED**

1-Chloro-2,3-epoxypropane, the mono- and di-2,3-epoxypropyl ethers of 1,4-butanediol, and 2,2-bis-4(2',3'-epoxypropoxy)-phenyl-propane can, in presence of catalytic quantities of halide ions, cause dehydrochlorination of trichloroethylene to dichloroacetylene, which causes minor explosions when the mixture is boiled under reflux.
[Bretherick, L. Handbook of Reactive Chemical Hazards. 4th ed. Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd., 1990223]**PEER REVIEWED**

Granular barium in contact with trichloroethylene is susceptible to detonation.
[Bretherick, L. Handbook of Reactive Chemical Hazards. 4th ed. Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd., 199078]**PEER REVIEWED**

Mixtures of powdered beryllium with trichloroethylene will flash on heavy impact.
[Bretherick, L. Handbook of Reactive Chemical Hazards. 4th ed. Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd., 199085]**PEER REVIEWED**

Mixtures of lithium shavings and trichloroethylene are impact-sensitive and willexplode, sometimes violently.
[Bretherick, L. Handbook of Reactive Chemical Hazards. 4th ed. Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd., 19901315]**PEER REVIEWED**

Mixtures of powdered magnesium with trichloroethylene will flash on heavy impact.
[Bretherick, L. Handbook of Reactive Chemical Hazards. 4th ed. Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd., 19901322]**PEER REVIEWED**

Mixtures of powdered titanium and trichloroethylene flash or spark under heavy impact.
[Bretherick, L. Handbook of Reactive Chemical Hazards. 4th ed. Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd., 19901464]**PEER REVIEWED**

Trichloroethylene reacts violently with the anhydrous perchloric acid.
[Bretherick, L. Handbook of Reactive Chemical Hazards. 4th ed. Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd., 1990963]**PEER REVIEWED**

Mixtures of dinitrogen tetraoxide with trichloroethylene react violently on heating to 150 deg C.
[Bretherick, L. Handbook of Reactive Chemical Hazards. 4th ed. Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd., 19901352]**PEER REVIEWED**

Mixture of liquid oxygen with dichloromethane, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, trichloroethylene, and chlorinated dye penetrants 1 and 2 exploded violently when initiated with a blasting cap.
[Bretherick, L. Handbook of Reactive Chemical Hazards. 4th ed. Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd., 19901408]**PEER REVIEWED**

In the presence of strong alkali (eg, sodium hydroxide), trichloroethylene can decompose into dichloroacetylene, an explosive, flammable, and highly toxic compound.
[Humphrey JH, McClelland M; Brit Med J 1: 315-8 (1944) as cited in USEPA; Health Assessment Document: Trichloroethylene (Draft) p.3-2 (1984) EPA-600/8-82-006B]**PEER REVIEWED**

Formation of phosgene, a highly toxic gas, was observed when trichloroethylene came into contact with iron, copper, zinc, or aluminum over the temperature range 250 deg C to 600 deg C.
[Sjoberg B; Svensk Kem Tid 64: 63-79 (1952) as cited in USEPA; Health Assessment Document: Trichloroethylene (Draft) p.3-2 (1982) EPA-600/8-82-006B]**PEER REVIEWED**

Mixtures of trichloroethylene and oxygen will ignite at temperatures above 25.5 deg C when the trichloroethylene concentration is between 10.3 and 64.5%.
[Jones G, Scott G; Report of Investigation 3666. US Bureau of Mines Washington, DC (1942) as cited in USPEA; Health Assessment Document: Trichloroethylene (Draft) p.3-1 (1983) EPA-600/8-82-006B]**PEER REVIEWED**

PHOTOREACTIVE LIQUID; WILL NOT ATTACK COMMON METALS EVEN IN PRESENCE OF MOISTURE
[Sax, N.I. and R.J. Lewis, Sr. (eds.). Hawley's Condensed Chemical Dictionary. 11th ed. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1987.1176]**PEER REVIEWED**

An emulsion, formed during extraction of a strongly alkaline liquor with trichloroethylene, decomposed with the evolution of the spontaneously flammable gas, dichloroacetylene. This reaction could also occur if alkaline metal-stripping preparations were used in conjunction with trichloroethylene degreasing preparations, some of which also contain amine inhibitors which could cause the same reaction.
[Bretherick, L. Handbook of Reactive Chemical Hazards. 4th ed. Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd., 1990223]**PEER REVIEWED**

Mixtures of dinitrogen tetraoxide with trichloroethylene are explosive when subjected to shock of 25 g TNT equivalent or less.
[Bretherick, L. Handbook of Reactive Chemical Hazards. 4th ed. Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd., 19901352]**PEER REVIEWED**

Aluminum powder reaction when /exposed/ to trichloroethylene.
[Bretherick, L. Handbook of Reactive Chemical Hazards. 4th ed. Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd., 199025]**PEER REVIEWED**

Incompatibilities: Strong caustics; when acidic reacts with aluminum; chemical active metals-barium, lithium, sodium, magnesium, titanium.
[Sittig, M. Handbook of Toxic and Hazardous Chemicals and Carcinogens, 1985. 2nd ed. Park Ridge, NJ: Noyes Data Corporation, 1985.883]**PEER REVIEWED**

Hazardous Decomposition:

SLOWLY DECOMPOSED WITH FORMATION OF HYDROCHLORIC ACID BY LIGHT IN PRESENCE OF MOISTURE
[Budavari, S. (ed.). The Merck Index - Encyclopedia of Chemicals, Drugs and Biologicals. Rahway, NJ: Merck and Co., Inc., 1989.1516]**PEER REVIEWED**

Autoxidation products, such as phosgene and dichloroacetylene, added stabilizers, such as epichlorohydrin, and decomp products, such as chlorine and hydrochloric acid, may be responsible for some of the toxic and carcinogenic effects reported for trichloroethylene.
[Gosselin, R.E., R.P. Smith, H.C. Hodge. Clinical Toxicology of Commercial Products. 5th ed. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1984.II-165]**PEER REVIEWED**

Immediately Dangerous to Life or Health:

NIOSH considers trichloroethylene to be a potential occupational carcinogen.
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997.316]**PEER REVIEWED**

Protective Equipment & Clothing:

Wear appropriate personal protective clothing to prevent skin contact.
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997.317]**PEER REVIEWED**

Facilities for quickly drenching the body should be provided within the immediate work area for emergency use where there is a possibility of exposure. [Note: It is intended that these facilities provide a sufficient quantity or flow of water to quickly remove the substance from any body areas likely to be exposed. The actual determination of what constitutes an adequate quick drench facility depends on the specific circumstances. In certain instances, a deluge shower should be readily available, whereas in others, the availability of water from a sink or hose could be considered adequate.]
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997.317]**PEER REVIEWED**

Eyewash fountains should be provided in areas where there is any possbility that workers could be exposed to the substance; this is irrespective of the recommendation involving the wearing of eye protection.
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997.317]**PEER REVIEWED**

Wear appropriate eye protection to prevent eye contact.
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997.317]**PEER REVIEWED**

Recommendations for respirator selection. Condition: At concentrations above the NIOSH REL, or where there is no REL, at any detectable concentration: Respirator Class(es): Any self-contained breathing apparatus that has a full facepiece and is operated in a pressure-demand or other positive-pressure mode. Any supplied-air respirator that has a full facepiece and is operated in a pressure-demand or other positive-pressure mode in combination with an auxiliary self-contained breathing apparatus operated in pressure-demand or other positive-pressure mode.
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997.317]**PEER REVIEWED**

Recommendations for respirator selection. Condition: Escape from suddenly occurring respiratory hazards: Respirator Class(es): Any air-purifying, full-facepiece respirator (gas mask) with a chin-style, front- or back-mounted organic vapor canister. Any appropriate escape-type, self-contained breathing apparatus.
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997.317]**PEER REVIEWED**

ORGANIC VAPOR-ACID CANISTER; SELF-CONTAINED BREATHING APPARATUS FOR EMERGENCIES; NEOPRENE OR VINYL GLOVES; CHEMICAL SAFETY GOGGLES; FACE-SHIELD; NEOPRENE SAFETY SHOES; NEOPRENE SUIT OR APRON FOR SPLASH PROTECTION.
[U.S. Coast Guard, Department of Transportation. CHRIS - Hazardous Chemical Data. Volume II. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1984-5.]**PEER REVIEWED**

/Wear/ positive-pressure hose masks, airline masks or an industrial canister-type gas mask fitted with an appropriate canister for absorbing trichloroethylene vapor are acceptable.
[International Labour Office. Encyclopedia of Occupational Health and Safety. Vols. I&II. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Office, 1983.2215]**PEER REVIEWED**

PRECAUTIONS FOR "CARCINOGENS": ... Dispensers of liq detergent /should be available./ ... Safety pipettes should be used for all pipetting. ... In animal laboratory, personnel should ... wear protective suits (preferably disposable, one-piece & close-fitting at ankles & wrists), gloves, hair covering & overshoes. ... In chemical laboratory, gloves & gowns should always be worn ... however, gloves should not be assumed to provide full protection. Carefully fitted masks or respirators may be necessary when working with particulates or gases, & disposable plastic aprons might provide addnl protection. ... Gowns ... /should be/ of distinctive color, this is a reminder that they are not to be worn outside the laboratory. /Chemical Carcinogens/
[Montesano, R., H. Bartsch, E.Boyland, G. Della Porta, L. Fishbein, R. A. Griesemer, A.B. Swan, L. Tomatis, and W. Davis (eds.). Handling Chemical Carcinogens in the Laboratory: Problems of Safety. IARC Scientific Publications No. 33. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1979.8]**PEER REVIEWED**

Cleaning of confined spaces presents serious hazards: the gas should be dispelled by mobile ventilators before workers are permitted to enter, safety belts & lifelines & respiratory protective equipment of the self-contained or supplied-air type should be avail, & another worker should be posted outside for supervision & rescue, if necessary.
[International Labour Office. Encyclopaedia of Occupational Health and Safety. 4th edition, Volumes 1-4 1998. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Office, 1998.65.13]**PEER REVIEWED**

Preventive Measures:

Recommended ventilation design concentrations: 100 ppm; dilution rate: 30,000 cu ft air/lb solvent flow.
[Verschueren, K. Handbook of Environmental Data of Organic Chemicals. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1983.608]**PEER REVIEWED**

PVC and natural rubber should not be used when cleaning up a TCE spill. Equipment should not be iron or metal, or be susceptible to hydrogen chloride.
[Kayser, R., D. Sterling, D. Viviani (eds.). Intermedia Priority Pollutant Guidance Documents. Washington, DC: U.S.Environmental Protection Agency, July 1982.]**PEER REVIEWED**

Processes employing trichloroethylene should be designed so that the operator is not exposed to direct contact with the solvent or its vapor. Open electric heaters, high-temp processes, arc welding or open flames should not be used in environments with trichloroethylene vapor. ... Workers should be given instruction in the safe handling ... and be well acquainted with the hazards that may result from improper use. ... Adequate sanitary facilities should be provided and workers encouraged to wash before eating and at the end of the shift.
[International Labour Office. Encyclopedia of Occupational Health and Safety. Vols. I&II. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Office, 1983.2215]**PEER REVIEWED**

Trichloroethylene should not be stored near foodstuffs, strong acids, alkalis, or oxidizing agents.
[WHO; Environ Health Criteria 50: Trichloroethylene p.32 (1985)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Stop discharge if possible. Keep people away. Avoid contact with liquid and vapor. Call fire department. Isolate and remove discharged material. Notify local health and pollution control agencies.
[U.S. Coast Guard, Department of Transportation. CHRIS - Hazardous Chemical Data. Volume II. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1984-5.]**PEER REVIEWED**

Avoid long contact with skin.
[Int'l Tech Info Inst; Tox & Haz Indus Chem Safety Manual, 510, 1982]**PEER REVIEWED**

Contact lenses should not be worn when working with this chemical.
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997.317]**PEER REVIEWED**

SRP: The scientific literature for the use of contact lenses in industry is conflicting. The benefit or detrimental effects of wearing contact lenses depend not only upon the substance, but also on factors including the form of the substance, characteristics and duration of the exposure, the uses of other eye protection equipment, and the hygiene of the lenses. However, there may be individual substances whose irritating or corrosive properties are such that the wearing of contact lenses would be harmful to the eye. In those specific cases, contact lenses should not be worn. In any event, the usual eye protection equipment should be worn even when contact lenses are in place.
**PEER REVIEWED**

The worker should immediately wash the skin when it becomes contaminated.
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997.317]**PEER REVIEWED**

Work clothing that becomes wet or significantly contaminated should be removed and replaced.
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997.317]**PEER REVIEWED**

If material not involved in fire: Keep material out of water sources and sewers. Build dikes to contain flow as necessary.
[Association of American Railroads. Emergency Handling of Hazardous Materials in Surface Transportation. Washington, DC: Association of American Railroads, Bureau of Explosives, 1994.1074]**PEER REVIEWED**

Personnel protection: Keep upwind. ... Avoid breathing vapors or dusts. Wash away any material which may have contacted the body with copious amounts of water or soap and water.
[Association of American Railroads. Emergency Handling of Hazardous Materials in Surface Transportation. Washington, DC: Association of American Railroads, Bureau of Explosives, 1994.1074]**PEER REVIEWED**

PRECAUTIONS FOR "CARCINOGENS": Smoking, drinking, eating, storage of food or of food & beverage containers or utensils, & the application of cosmetics should be prohibited in any laboratory. All personnel should remove gloves, if worn, after completion of procedures in which carcinogens have been used. They should ... wash ... hands, preferably using dispensers of liq detergent, & rinse ... thoroughly. Consideration should be given to appropriate methods for cleaning the skin, depending on nature of the contaminant. No standard procedure can be recommended, but the use of organic solvents should be avoided. Safety pipettes should be used for all pipetting. /Chemical Carcinogens/
[Montesano, R., H. Bartsch, E.Boyland, G. Della Porta, L. Fishbein, R. A. Griesemer, A.B. Swan, L. Tomatis, and W. Davis (eds.). Handling Chemical Carcinogens in the Laboratory: Problems of Safety. IARC Scientific Publications No. 33. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1979.8]**PEER REVIEWED**

PRECAUTIONS FOR "CARCINOGENS": In animal laboratory, personnel should remove their outdoor clothes & wear protective suits (preferably disposable, one-piece & close-fitting at ankles & wrists), gloves, hair covering & overshoes. ... Clothing should be changed daily but ... discarded immediately if obvious contamination occurs ... /also,/ workers should shower immediately. In chemical laboratory, gloves & gowns should always be worn ... however, gloves should not be assumed to provide full protection. Carefully fitted masks or respirators may be necessary when working with particulates or gases, & disposable plastic aprons might provide addnl protection. If gowns are of distinctive color, this is a reminder that they should not be worn outside of lab. /Chemical Carcinogens/
[Montesano, R., H. Bartsch, E.Boyland, G. Della Porta, L. Fishbein, R. A. Griesemer, A.B. Swan, L. Tomatis, and W. Davis (eds.). Handling Chemical Carcinogens in the Laboratory: Problems of Safety. IARC Scientific Publications No. 33. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1979.8]**PEER REVIEWED**

PRECAUTIONS FOR "CARCINOGENS": ... Operations connected with synth & purification ... should be carried out under well-ventilated hood. Analytical procedures ... should be carried out with care & vapors evolved during ... procedures should be removed. ... Expert advice should be obtained before existing fume cupboards are used ... & when new fume cupboards are installed. It is desirable that there be means for decreasing the rate of air extraction, so that carcinogenic powders can be handled without ... powder being blown around the hood. Glove boxes should be kept under negative air pressure. Air changes should be adequate, so that concn of vapors of volatile carcinogens will not occur. /Chemical Carcinogens/
[Montesano, R., H. Bartsch, E.Boyland, G. Della Porta, L. Fishbein, R. A. Griesemer, A.B. Swan, L. Tomatis, and W. Davis (eds.). Handling Chemical Carcinogens in the Laboratory: Problems of Safety. IARC Scientific Publications No. 33. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1979.8]**PEER REVIEWED**

PRECAUTIONS FOR "CARCINOGENS": Vertical laminar-flow biological safety cabinets may be used for containment of in vitro procedures ... provided that the exhaust air flow is sufficient to provide an inward air flow at the face opening of the cabinet, & contaminated air plenums that are under positive pressure are leak-tight. Horizontal laminar-flow hoods or safety cabinets, where filtered air is blown across the working area towards the operator, should never be used ... Each cabinet or fume cupboard to be used ... should be tested before work is begun (eg, with fume bomb) & label fixed to it, giving date of test & avg air-flow measured. This test should be repeated periodically & after any structural changes. /Chemical Carcinogens/
[Montesano, R., H. Bartsch, E.Boyland, G. Della Porta, L. Fishbein, R. A. Griesemer, A.B. Swan, L. Tomatis, and W. Davis (eds.). Handling Chemical Carcinogens in the Laboratory: Problems of Safety. IARC Scientific Publications No. 33. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1979.9]**PEER REVIEWED**

PRECAUTIONS FOR "CARCINOGENS": Principles that apply to chem or biochem lab also apply to microbiological & cell-culture labs ... Special consideration should be given to route of admin. ... Safest method of administering volatile carcinogen is by injection of a soln. Admin by topical application, gavage, or intratracheal instillation should be performed under hood. If chem will be exhaled, animals should be kept under hood during this period. Inhalation exposure requires special equipment. ... Unless specifically required, routes of admin other than in the diet should be used. Mixing of carcinogen in diet should be carried out in sealed mixers under fume hood, from which the exhaust is fitted with an efficient particulate filter. Techniques for cleaning mixer & hood should be devised before expt begun. When mixing diets, special protective clothing &, possibly, respirators may be required. /Chemical Carcinogens/
[Montesano, R., H. Bartsch, E.Boyland, G. Della Porta, L. Fishbein, R. A. Griesemer, A.B. Swan, L. Tomatis, and W. Davis (eds.). Handling Chemical Carcinogens in the Laboratory: Problems of Safety. IARC Scientific Publications No. 33. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1979.9]**PEER REVIEWED**

PRECAUTIONS FOR "CARCINOGENS": When ... admin in diet or applied to skin, animals should be kept in cages with solid bottoms & sides & fitted with a filter top. When volatile carcinogens are given, filter tops should not be used. Cages which have been used to house animals that received carcinogens should be decontaminated. Cage-cleaning facilities should be installed in area in which carcinogens are being used, to avoid moving of ... contaminated /cages/. It is difficult to ensure that cages are decontaminated, & monitoring methods are necessary. Situations may exist in which the use of disposable cages should be recommended, depending on type & amt of carcinogen & efficiency with which it can be removed. /Chemical Carcinogens/
[Montesano, R., H. Bartsch, E.Boyland, G. Della Porta, L. Fishbein, R. A. Griesemer, A.B. Swan, L. Tomatis, and W. Davis (eds.). Handling Chemical Carcinogens in the Laboratory: Problems of Safety. IARC Scientific Publications No. 33. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1979.10]**PEER REVIEWED**

PRECAUTIONS FOR "CARCINOGENS": To eliminate risk that ... contamination in lab could build up during conduct of expt, periodic checks should be carried out on lab atmospheres, surfaces, such as walls, floors & benches, & ... interior of fume hoods & airducts. As well as regular monitoring, check must be carried out after cleaning-up of spillage. Sensitive methods are required when testing lab atmospheres. ... Methods ... should ... where possible, be simple & sensitive. /Chemical Carcinogens/
[Montesano, R., H. Bartsch, E.Boyland, G. Della Porta, L. Fishbein, R. A. Griesemer, A.B. Swan, L. Tomatis, and W. Davis (eds.). Handling Chemical Carcinogens in the Laboratory: Problems of Safety. IARC Scientific Publications No. 33. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1979.10]**PEER REVIEWED**

PRECAUTIONS FOR "CARCINOGENS": Rooms in which obvious contamination has occurred, such as spillage, should be decontaminated by lab personnel engaged in expt. Design of expt should ... avoid contamination of permanent equipment. ... Procedures should ensure that maintenance workers are not exposed to carcinogens. ... Particular care should be taken to avoid contamination of drains or ventilation ducts. In cleaning labs, procedures should be used which do not produce aerosols or dispersal of dust, ie, wet mop or vacuum cleaner equipped with high-efficiency particulate filter on exhaust, which are avail commercially, should be used. Sweeping, brushing & use of dry dusters or mops should be prohibited. Grossly contaminated cleaning materials should not be re-used ... If gowns or towels are contaminated, they should not be sent to laundry, but ... decontaminated or burnt, to avoid any hazard to laundry personnel. /Chemical Carcinogens/
[Montesano, R., H. Bartsch, E.Boyland, G. Della Porta, L. Fishbein, R. A. Griesemer, A.B. Swan, L. Tomatis, and W. Davis (eds.). Handling Chemical Carcinogens in the Laboratory: Problems of Safety. IARC Scientific Publications No. 33. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1979.10]**PEER REVIEWED**

PRECAUTIONS FOR "CARCINOGENS": Doors leading into areas where carcinogens are used ... should be marked distinctively with appropriate labels. Access ... limited to persons involved in expt. ... A prominently displayed notice should give the name of the Scientific Investigator or other person who can advise in an emergency & who can inform others (such as firemen) on the handling of carcinogenic substances. /Chemical Carcinogens/
[Montesano, R., H. Bartsch, E.Boyland, G. Della Porta, L. Fishbein, R. A. Griesemer, A.B. Swan, L. Tomatis, and W. Davis (eds.). Handling Chemical Carcinogens in the Laboratory: Problems of Safety. IARC Scientific Publications No. 33. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1979.11]**PEER REVIEWED**

Stability/Shelf Life:

RELATIVELY STABLE IN AIR
[Browning, E. Toxicity and Metabolism of Industrial Solvents. New York: American Elsevier, 1965.189]**PEER REVIEWED**

UNSTABLE IN LIGHT AND MOISTURE
[Osol, A. (ed.). Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences. 16th ed. Easton, Pennsylvania: Mack Publishing Co., 1980.985]**PEER REVIEWED**

Shipment Methods and Regulations:

PRECAUTIONS FOR "CARCINOGENS": Procurement ... of unduly large amt ... should be avoided. To avoid spilling, carcinogens should be transported in securely sealed glass bottles or ampoules, which should themselves be placed inside strong screw-cap or snap-top container that will not open when dropped & will resist attack from the carcinogen. Both bottle & the outside container should be appropriately labelled. ... National post offices, railway companies, road haulage companies & airlines have regulations governing transport of hazardous materials. These authorities should be consulted before ... material is shipped. /Chemical Carcinogens/
[Montesano, R., H. Bartsch, E.Boyland, G. Della Porta, L. Fishbein, R. A. Griesemer, A.B. Swan, L. Tomatis, and W. Davis (eds.). Handling Chemical Carcinogens in the Laboratory: Problems of Safety. IARC Scientific Publications No. 33. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1979.13]**PEER REVIEWED**

PRECAUTIONS FOR "CARCINOGENS": When no regulations exist, the following procedure must be adopted. The carcinogen should be enclosed in a securely sealed, watertight container (primary container), which should be enclosed in a second, unbreakable, leakproof container that will withstand chem attack from the carcinogen (secondary container). The space between primary & secondary container should be filled with absorbent material, which would withstand chem attack from the carcinogen & is sufficient to absorb the entire contents of the primary container in the event of breakage or leakage. Each secondary container should then be enclosed in a strong outer box. The space between the secondary container & the outer box should be filled with an appropriate quantity of shock-absorbent material. Sender should use fastest & most secure form of transport & notify recipient of its departure. If parcel is not received when expected, carrier should be informed so that immediate effort can be made to find it. Traffic schedules should be consulted to avoid ... arrival on weekend or holiday ... /Chemical Carcinogens/
[Montesano, R., H. Bartsch, E.Boyland, G. Della Porta, L. Fishbein, R. A. Griesemer, A.B. Swan, L. Tomatis, and W. Davis (eds.). Handling Chemical Carcinogens in the Laboratory: Problems of Safety. IARC Scientific Publications No. 33. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1979.13]**PEER REVIEWED**

No person may /transport,/ offer or accept a hazardous material for transportation in commerce unless that person is registered in conformance ... and the hazardous material is properly classed, described, packaged, marked, labeled, and in condition for shipment as required or authorized by ... /the hazardous materials regulations (49 CFR 171-177)./
[49 CFR 171.2 (7/1/2000)]**PEER REVIEWED**

The International Air Transport Association (IATA) Dangerous Goods Regulations are published by the IATA Dangerous Goods Board pursuant to IATA Resolutions 618 and 619 and constitute a manual of industry carrier regulations to be followed by all IATA Member airlines when transporting hazardous materials.
[IATA. Dangerous Goods Regulations. 41st Ed.Montreal, Canada and Geneva, Switzerland: International Air Transport Association, Dangerous Goods Regulations, 2000. 229]**PEER REVIEWED**

The International Maritime Dangerous Goods Code lays down basic principles for transporting hazardous chemicals. Detailed recommendations for individual substances and a number of recommendations for good practice are included in the classes dealing with such substances. A general index of technical names has also been compiled. This index should always be consulted when attempting to locate the appropriate procedures to be used when shipping any substance or article.
[IMDG; International Maritime Dangerous Goods Code; International Maritime Organization p.6273 (1998)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Storage Conditions:

STORE IN COOL, DRY, WELL-VENTILATED LOCATION. SEPARATE FROM ACTIVE METALS. ISOLATE FROM OPEN FLAMES AND COMBUSTIBLES.
[Fire Protection Guide to Hazardous Materials. 12 ed. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association, 1997. 49-130]**PEER REVIEWED**

Store trichloroethylene in cans or in dark glass bottles to minimize decomposition.
[Noweir M et al; Am Ind Hyg Assoc 33: 454-60 (1973) as cited in USEPA; Health Assessment Document: Trichloroethylene (Draft) p.3-2 (1983) EPA-600/ 8-82-006B]**PEER REVIEWED**

All containers for trichloroethylene should bear a label giving the following or similar information: TRICHLOROETHYLENE-WARNING Vapor harmful. Use only with adequate ventilation. /safe handling & storage of chemicals/
[International Labour Office. Encyclopaedia of Occupational Health and Safety. 4th edition, Volumes 1-4 1998. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Office, 1998.61.10]**PEER REVIEWED**

... May be stored satisfactorily in galvanized iron, black iron, or steel containers.
[International Labour Office. Encyclopedia of Occupational Health and Safety. Vols. I&II. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Office, 1983.2155]**PEER REVIEWED**

Preserve trichloroethylene in sealed, light-resistant ampules or in frangible, light-resistant glass tubes.
[Budavari, S. (ed.). The Merck Index - Encyclopedia of Chemicals, Drugs and Biologicals. Rahway, NJ: Merck and Co., Inc., 1989.1516]**PEER REVIEWED**

Storage temp: ambient
[U.S. Coast Guard, Department of Transportation. CHRIS - Hazardous Chemical Data. Volume II. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1984-5.]**PEER REVIEWED**

Storage areas should be cool, well-ventilated, flame-proof, and shielded from direct sunlight, high-temperature surfaces, or sparks.
[WHO; Environ Health Criteria 50: Trichloroethylene p.32 (1985)]**PEER REVIEWED**

PRECAUTIONS FOR "CARCINOGENS": Storage site should be as close as practical to lab in which carcinogens are to be used, so that only small quantities required for ... expt need to be carried. Carcinogens should be kept in only one section of cupboard, an explosion-proof refrigerator or freezer (depending on chemicophysical properties ...) that bears appropriate label. An inventory ... should be kept, showing quantity of carcinogen & date it was acquired ... Facilities for dispensing ... should be contiguous to storage area. /Chemical Carcinogens/
[Montesano, R., H. Bartsch, E.Boyland, G. Della Porta, L. Fishbein, R. A. Griesemer, A.B. Swan, L. Tomatis, and W. Davis (eds.). Handling Chemical Carcinogens in the Laboratory: Problems of Safety. IARC Scientific Publications No. 33. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1979.13]**PEER REVIEWED**

Cleanup Methods:

Contain and isolate spill by using clay/bentonite dams, interceptor trenches, or impoundments. /SRP: If time permits, pits, ponds, lagoons, soak holes, or holding areas should be sealed with an impermeable flexible membrane liner./ Construct swale to divert uncontaminated portion of watershed around contaminated portion. ... Density stratification and impoundment -- remove product from bottom layer by pumping through manifold or polyethylene rope mop collection or remove clarified upper portion by skimmers or siphon. Treatment is required for both clarified and concentrated fractions. Treatment alternatives include powdered activated carbon, granular activated carbon, and biodegradation. /Other/ treatment alternatives for contaminated soils include well point collection and treatment of leachates as for contaminated waters, bentonite/cement injection to immobilize spill.
[Kayser, R., D. Sterling, D. Viviani (eds.). Intermedia Priority Pollutant Guidance Documents. Washington, DC: U.S.Environmental Protection Agency, July 1982.8-1]**PEER REVIEWED**

Waste water treatment: evaporation from water at 25 deg C of 1 ppm solution: 50% after 19-24 min, 90% after 63-80 min
[Verschueren, K. Handbook of Environmental Data of Organic Chemicals. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1983.1134]**PEER REVIEWED**

Environmental considerations: Land spill: Dig a pit, pond, lagoon, holding area to contain liquid or solid material. /SRP: If time permits, pits, ponds, lagoons, soak holes, or holding areas should be sealed with an impermeable flexible membrane liner./ Dike surface flow using soil, sand bags, foamed polyurethane, or foamed concrete. Absorb bulk liquid with fly ash or cement powder.
[Association of American Railroads. Emergency Handling of Hazardous Materials in Surface Transportation. Washington, DC: Association of American Railroads, Bureau of Explosives, 1994.1074]**PEER REVIEWED**

Environmental consideration: Water spill: If dissolved, in region of 10 ppm or greater concentations, apply activated carbon at ten times the spilled amount. Remove trapped material with suction hoses. Use mechanical dredges or lifts to remove immobilized masses of pollutants and precipitates.
[Association of American Railroads. Emergency Handling of Hazardous Materials in Surface Transportation. Washington, DC: Association of American Railroads, Bureau of Explosives, 1994.1074]**PEER REVIEWED**

Environmental considerations: Air spill: Apply water spray or mist to knock down vapors. Combustion products include corrosive or toxic vapors.
[Association of American Railroads. Emergency Handling of Hazardous Materials in Surface Transportation. Washington, DC: Association of American Railroads, Bureau of Explosives, 1994.1074]**PEER REVIEWED**

PRECAUTIONS FOR "CARCINOGENS": A high-efficiency particulate arrestor (HEPA) or charcoal filters can be used to minimize amt of carcinogen in exhausted air ventilated safety cabinets, lab hoods, glove boxes or animal rooms ... Filter housing that is designed so that used filters can be transferred into plastic bag without contaminating maintenance staff is avail commercially. Filters should be placed in plastic bags immediately after removal ... The plastic bag should be sealed immediately ... The sealed bag should be labelled properly ... Waste liquids ... should be placed or collected in proper containers for disposal. The lid should be secured & the bottles properly labelled. Once filled, bottles should be placed in plastic bag, so that outer surface ... is not contaminated ... The plastic bag should also be sealed & labelled. ... Broken glassware ... should be decontaminated by solvent extraction, by chemical destruction, or in specially designed incinerators. /Chemical Carcinogens/
[Montesano, R., H. Bartsch, E.Boyland, G. Della Porta, L. Fishbein, R. A. Griesemer, A.B. Swan, L. Tomatis, and W. Davis (eds.). Handling Chemical Carcinogens in the Laboratory: Problems of Safety. IARC Scientific Publications No. 33. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1979.15]**PEER REVIEWED**

Disposal Methods:

Generators of waste (equal to or greater than 100 kg/mo) containing this contaminant, EPA hazardous waste numbers U228, D040, and F002 must conform with USEPA regulations in storage, transportation, treatment and disposal of waste.
[40 CFR 240-280, 300-306, 702-799 (7/1/2000)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Incineration, preferably after mixing with another combustible fuel. Care must be exercised to assure complete combustion to prevent the formation of phosgene. An acid scrubber is necessary to remove the halo acids produced. An alternative to disposal for trichloroethylene is recovery and recycling.
[Sittig, M. Handbook of Toxic and Hazardous Chemicals and Carcinogens, 1985. 2nd ed. Park Ridge, NJ: Noyes Data Corporation, 1985.885]**PEER REVIEWED**

Group I Containers: Combustible containers from organic or metallo-organic pesticides (except organic mercury, lead, cadmium, or arsenic compounds) should be disposed of in pesticide incinerators or in specified landfill sites. /Organic or metallo-organic pesticides/
[40 CFR 165 (7/1/87)]**PEER REVIEWED**

This compound should be susceptible to removal from wastewater by air stripping.
[USEPA/ORD; Innovative and Alternative Technology Assessment Manual pp. 3-5, 3-11-3-12 (1980)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Chemical Treatability of Trichloroethylene; Concentration Process: Activated Carbon; Chemical Classification: Halogens; Scale of Study: Pilot Scale/Continuous Flow; Type of Wastewater Used: Hazardous Material Spill; Influent Concentration: 21 ppb; Results of Study: 98.6% removal with 0.3 ppb detected in effluent after 8.5 min contact time (250,000 gal spilled materials treated with EPA mobile treatment trailer).
[Becker DL, Wilson SC; Carbon Adsorption Handbook (1978) p.167-213 as cited in USEPA; Management of Hazardous Waste Leachate, EPA Contract No. 68-03-2766 p.E-161 (1982)]**PEER REVIEWED**

The following wastewater treatment technology has been investigated for trichloroethylene: Concentration process: Biological treatment.
[USEPA; Management of Hazardous Waste Leachate, EPA Contract No.68-03-2766 p.E-51 (1982)]**PEER REVIEWED**

The following wastewater treatment technology has been investigated for trichloroethylene: Concentration process: Chemical precipitation.
[USEPA; Management of Hazardous Waste Leachate, EPA Contract No.68-03-2766 p.E-67 (1982)]**PEER REVIEWED**

The following wastewater treatment technology has been investigated for trichloroethylene: Concentration process: Stripping.
[USEPA; Management of Hazardous Waste Leachate, EPA Contract No.68-03-2766 p.E-106 (1982)]**PEER REVIEWED**

The following wastewater treatment technology has been investigated for trichloroethylene: Concentration process: Solvent extraction.
[USEPA; Management of Hazardous Waste Leachate, EPA Contract No.68-03-2766 p.E-118 (1982)]**PEER REVIEWED**

The following wastewater treatment technology has been investigated for trichloroethylene: Concentration process: Activated carbon.
[USEPA; Management of Hazardous Waste Leachate, EPA Contract No.68-03-2766 p.E-161 (1982)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Trichloroethylene is a waste chemical stream constituent which may be subjected to ultimate disposal by controlled incineration. Incineration, preferably after mixing with another combustible fuel; care must be exercised to assure complete combustion to prevent the formation of phosgene. An acid scrubber is necessary to remove the halo acids produced.
[USEPA; Engineering Handbook for Hazardous Waste Incineration p.2-10 (1981) EPA 68-03-3025]**PEER REVIEWED**

A potential candidate for rotary kiln incineration at a temperature range of 820 to 1,600 deg C and residence times of seconds for liquids and gases, and hours for solids. A potential candidate for fluidized bed incineration at a temperature range of 450 to 980 deg C and residence times of seconds for liquids and gases, and longer for solids. A potential candidate for liquid injection incineration at a temperature range of 650 to 1,600 deg C and a residence time of 0.1 to 2 seconds.
[USEPA; Engineering Handbook for Hazardous Waste Incineration p.3-16 (1981) EPA 68-03-3025]**PEER REVIEWED**

Recovering: Incineration, preferably after mixing with another combustible fuel. Care must be exercised to assure complete combustion to prevent the formation of phosgene. An acid scrubber is necessary to remove the halo acids produced. An alternative to disposal for TCE /trichloroethylene/ is recovery and recycling. Recommendable method: Incineration. Not recommendable method: Discharge to sewer.
[United Nations. Treatment and Disposal Methods for Waste Chemicals (IRPTC File). Data Profile Series No. 5. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations Environmental Programme, Dec. 1985.181]**PEER REVIEWED**

Incineration & evaporation: Small quantities may be poured onto a 10% soda ash and sand mixture, then placed in a paper container and incinerated. Wastes from cleaning operations should be stored in a well ventilated area until they can be incinerated or chemically treated to reduce the toxicity. Residues may be poured on sand, soil or ashes, at a safe distance from occupied areas and allowed to evaporate in the atmosphere.
[United Nations. Treatment and Disposal Methods for Waste Chemicals (IRPTC File). Data Profile Series No. 5. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations Environmental Programme, Dec. 1985.181]**PEER REVIEWED**

PRECAUTIONS FOR "CARCINOGENS": There is no universal method of disposal that has been proved satisfactory for all carcinogenic compounds & specific methods of chem destruction ... published have not been tested on all kinds of carcinogen-containing waste. ... summary of avail methods & recommendations ... /given/ must be treated as guide only. /Chemical Carcinogens/
[Montesano, R., H. Bartsch, E.Boyland, G. Della Porta, L. Fishbein, R. A. Griesemer, A.B. Swan, L. Tomatis, and W. Davis (eds.). Handling Chemical Carcinogens in the Laboratory: Problems of Safety. IARC Scientific Publications No. 33. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1979.14]**PEER REVIEWED**

PRECAUTIONS FOR "CARCINOGENS": ... Incineration may be only feasible method for disposal of contaminated laboratory waste from biological expt. However, not all incinerators are suitable for this purpose. The most efficient type ... is probably the gas-fired type, in which a first-stage combustion with a less than stoichiometric air:fuel ratio is followed by a second stage with excess air. Some ... are designed to accept ... aqueous & organic-solvent solutions, otherwise it is necessary ... to absorb soln onto suitable combustible material, such as sawdust. Alternatively, chem destruction may be used, esp when small quantities ... are to be destroyed in laboratory. /Chemical Carcinogens/
[Montesano, R., H. Bartsch, E.Boyland, G. Della Porta, L. Fishbein, R. A. Griesemer, A.B. Swan, L. Tomatis, and W. Davis (eds.). Handling Chemical Carcinogens in the Laboratory: Problems of Safety. IARC Scientific Publications No. 33. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1979.15]**PEER REVIEWED**

PRECAUTIONS FOR "CARCINOGENS": HEPA (high-efficiency particulate arrestor) filters ... can be disposed of by incineration. For spent charcoal filters, the adsorbed material can be stripped off at high temp & carcinogenic wastes generated by this treatment conducted to & burned in an incinerator. ... LIQUID WASTE: ... Disposal should be carried out by incineration at temp that ... ensure complete combustion. SOLID WASTE: Carcasses of lab animals, cage litter & misc solid wastes ... should be disposed of by incineration at temp high enough to ensure destruction of chem carcinogens or their metabolites. /Chemical Carcinogens/
[Montesano, R., H. Bartsch, E.Boyland, G. Della Porta, L. Fishbein, R. A. Griesemer, A.B. Swan, L. Tomatis, and W. Davis (eds.). Handling Chemical Carcinogens in the Laboratory: Problems of Safety. IARC Scientific Publications No. 33. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1979.15]**PEER REVIEWED**

PRECAUTIONS FOR "CARCINOGENS": ... Small quantities of ... some carcinogens can be destroyed using chem reactions ... but no general rules can be given. ... As a general technique ... treatment with sodium dichromate in strong sulfuric acid can be used. The time necessary for destruction ... is seldom known ... but 1-2 days is generally considered sufficient when freshly prepd reagent is used. ... Carcinogens that are easily oxidizable can be destroyed with milder oxidative agents, such as saturated soln of potassium permanganate in acetone, which appears to be a suitable agent for destruction of hydrazines or of compounds containing isolated carbon-carbon double bonds. Concn or 50% aqueous sodium hypochlorite can also be used as an oxidizing agent. /Chemical Carcinogens/
[Montesano, R., H. Bartsch, E.Boyland, G. Della Porta, L. Fishbein, R. A. Griesemer, A.B. Swan, L. Tomatis, and W. Davis (eds.). Handling Chemical Carcinogens in the Laboratory: Problems of Safety. IARC Scientific Publications No. 33. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1979.16]**PEER REVIEWED**

PRECAUTIONS FOR "CARCINOGENS": Carcinogens that are alkylating, arylating or acylating agents per se can be destroyed by reaction with appropriate nucleophiles, such as water, hydroxyl ions, ammonia, thiols & thiosulfate. The reactivity of various alkylating agents varies greatly ... & is also influenced by sol of agent in the reaction medium. To facilitate the complete reaction, it is suggested that the agents be dissolved in ethanol or similar solvents. ... No method should be applied ... until it has been thoroughly tested for its effectiveness & safety on material to be inactivated. For example, in case of destruction of alkylating agents, it is possible to detect residual compounds by reaction with 4(4-nitrobenzyl)-pyridine. /Chemical Carcinogens/
[Montesano, R., H. Bartsch, E.Boyland, G. Della Porta, L. Fishbein, R. A. Griesemer, A.B. Swan, L. Tomatis, and W. Davis (eds.). Handling Chemical Carcinogens in the Laboratory: Problems of Safety. IARC Scientific Publications No. 33. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1979.17]**PEER REVIEWED**

Occupational Exposure Standards:

OSHA Standards:

Permissible Exposure Limit: Table Z-2 8-hr Time Weighted Avg: 100 ppm.
[29 CFR 1910.1000 (7/1/2000)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Permissible Exposure Limit: Table Z-2 Acceptable Ceiling Concentration: 200 ppm.
[29 CFR 1910.1000 (7/1/2000)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Permissible Exposure Limit: Table Z-2 Acceptable maximum peak above the acceptable ceiling concentration for an 8-hour shift. Concentration: 300 ppm. Maximum Duration: 5 minutes in any 2 hours.
[29 CFR 1910.1000 (7/1/2000)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Vacated 1989 OSHA PEL TWA 50 ppm (270 mg/cu m); STEL 200 ppm (1080 mg/cu m) is still enforced in some states.
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997.372]**PEER REVIEWED**

Threshold Limit Values:

8 hr Time Weighted Avg (TWA) 50 ppm; Short Term Exposure Limit (STEL) 100 ppm
[American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. TLVs and BEIs. Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices. Cincinnati, OH. 2000.68]**PEER REVIEWED**

BEI (Biological Exposure Index) for Trichloroethylene: Trichloroacetic acid in urine at end of workweek is 100 mg/g creatinine. The determinant is nonspecific, since it is observed after exposure to other chemicals. (1986 Adoption)
[American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. TLVs and BEIs. Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices. Cincinnati, OH. 2000.102]**PEER REVIEWED**

BEI (Biological Exposure Index) for Trichloroethylene: Trichloroacetic acid and trichloroethanol in urine at end of shift at end of workweek is 300 mg/g creatinine. The determinant is nonspecific, since it is observed after exposure to other chemicals. (1986 adoption)
[American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. TLVs and BEIs. Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices. Cincinnati, OH. 2000.102]**PEER REVIEWED**

BEI (Biological Exposure Index) for Trichloroethylene: Trichloroethylene in end-exhaled air. The biological determinant is an indicator of exposure to the chemical, but the quantitative interpretation of the measurement is ambiguous. These determinants should be used as a screening test if a quantitative test is not practical or as a confirmatory test if the quantitative test is not specific and the origin of the determinant is in question.
[American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. TLVs and BEIs. Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices. Cincinnati, OH. 2000.102]**PEER REVIEWED**

A5: Not suspected as a human carcinogen.
[American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. TLVs and BEIs. Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices. Cincinnati, OH. 2000.68]**PEER REVIEWED**

BEI (Biological Exposure Index) for Trichloroethylene: Free trichloroethanol in blood at end of shift at end of workweek is 4 mg/l. The determinant is nonspecific, since it is observed after exposure to other chemicals. (1986 adoption)
[American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. TLVs and BEIs. Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices. Cincinnati, OH. 2000.102]**PEER REVIEWED**

BEI (Biological Exposure Index) for Trichloroethylene: Trichloroethylene in blood. The biological determinant is an indicator of exposure to the chemical, but the quantitative interpretation of the measurement is ambiguous. These determinants should be used as a screening test if a quantitative test is not practical or as a confirmatory test if the quantitative test is not specific and the origin of the determinant is in question. (1993 adoption) /No value specified in text/
[American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. TLVs and BEIs. Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices. Cincinnati, OH. 2000.102]**PEER REVIEWED**

NIOSH Recommendations:

NIOSH considers trichloroethylene to be a potential occupational carcinogen.
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997.316]**PEER REVIEWED**

NIOSH usually recommends that occupational exposures to carcinogens be limited to the lowest feasible concentration.
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997.316]**PEER REVIEWED**

Recommended Exposure Limit: 60 Min Ceiling Value: 2 ppm. /During the usage of trichloroethylene as an anesthetic agent/
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997.316]**PEER REVIEWED**

Recommended Exposure Limit: 10 Hr Time-Weighted Avg: 25 ppm. /During exposures to trichloroethylene other than as an anesthetic agent/
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997.316]**PEER REVIEWED**

Immediately Dangerous to Life or Health:

NIOSH considers trichloroethylene to be a potential occupational carcinogen.
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997.316]**PEER REVIEWED**

Other Occupational Permissible Levels:

Occupational exposure limits used in various countries are as follows: (time-weighted values) Australia: 535 mg/cu m; Austria: 260 mg/cu m; Belgium: 535 mg/cu m; Bulgaria: 10 mg/cu m; Czechoslovakia: 250 mg/cu m, ceiling value 1250 mg/cu m; Egypt: 267; Finland: 260 mg/cu m; France: 405 mg/cu m, ceiling value 1080 mg/cu m; German Democratic Republic: 250 mg/cu m, ceiling limit: 750 mg/cu m; Germany, Federal Republic: 260 mg/cu m; Hungary: 50 mg/cu m; Italy: 400 mg/cu m, skin irritation 1000 mg/cu m; Japan: 268 mg/cu m; Netherlands: 190 mg/cu m; Poland: 50 mg/cu m (ceiling value); Romania: 200 mg/cu m, 300 mg/cu m (ceiling value); Spain: 535 mg/cu m; Sweden: 110 mg/cu m, short-term exposure limit 250 mg/cu m; Switzerland: 260 mg/cu m; United Kingdom: 535 mg/cu m; USSR: 10 mg/cu m (ceiling value); Yugoslavia: 200 mg/cu m.
[WHO; Environ Health Criteria 50: Trichloroethylene p.34 (1985)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Emergency Response Planning Guidelines (ERPG): ERPG(1) 100 ppm (no more than mild, transient effects) for up to 1 hr exposure; ERPG(2) 500 ppm (without serious, adverse effects) for up to 1 hr exposure; ERPG(3) 5000 ppm (not life threatening) up to 1 hr exposure.
[American Industrial Hygiene Association. The AIHA 2000 Emergency Response Planning Guidelines and Workplace Environmental Exposure Level Guides Handbook. AIHA Press, Fairfax, VA. 2000. 26]**PEER REVIEWED**

Manufacturing/Use Information:

Major Uses:

For Trichloroethylene (USEPA/OPP Pesticide Code: 081202) there are 0 labels match. /SRP: Not registered for current use in the U.S., but approved pesticide uses may change periodically and so federal, state and local authorities must be consulted for currently approved uses./
[U.S. Environmental Protection Agency/Office of Pesticide Program's Chemical Ingredients Database on Trichloroethylene (79-01-6). Available from the Database Query page at http://www.cdpr.ca.gov/docs/epa/epamenu.htm as of october 24, 2002.]**QC REVIEWED**

Therap cat: anesthetic (inhalation)/former use/; Therap cat (vet): anesthetic (inhalation)
[Budavari, S. (ed.). The Merck Index - An Encyclopedia of Chemicals, Drugs, and Biologicals. Whitehouse Station, NJ: Merck and Co., Inc., 1996.1643]**PEER REVIEWED**

IN GAS PURIFICATION, AS A SOLVENT OF SULFUR & PHOSPHORUS
[Browning, E. Toxicity and Metabolism of Industrial Solvents. New York: American Elsevier, 1965.190]**PEER REVIEWED**

Aerospace operations (flushing liquid oxygen)
[Lewis, R.J., Sr (Ed.). Hawley's Condensed Chemical Dictionary. 13th ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1997. 1125]**PEER REVIEWED**

AGENT IN REMOVAL OF BASTING THREADS IN TEXTILE PROCESSING
[SRI]**PEER REVIEWED**

CHEM INT FOR 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHYL SULFENYL CHLORIDE
[SRI]**PEER REVIEWED**

SOLVENT BASE FOR METAL PHOSPHATIZING SYSTEMS
[SRI]**PEER REVIEWED**

SOLVENT IN CHARACTERIZATION TEST FOR ASPHALT
[SRI]**PEER REVIEWED**

ENTRAINER FOR RECOVERY OF FORMIC ACID
[SRI]**PEER REVIEWED**

Used as household cleaner; with trichloroethane it is used in most typewriter correction fluid. /SRP: Former use/
[Arena, J.M. and Drew, R.H. (eds.) Poisoning-Toxicology, Symptoms, Treatments. 5th ed. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas Publisher, 1986.257]**PEER REVIEWED**

Used in wool-fabric scouring
[CONSIDINE. CHEMICAL AND PROCESS TECHNOL ENCYC 1974 p.1109]**PEER REVIEWED**

Intermediate in the production of pentachloroethane.
[WHO; Environ Health Criteria 50: Trichloroethylene p.30 (1985)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Carrier solvent for the active ingredients of insecticides, and fungicides.
[WHO; Environ Health Criteria 50: Trichloroethylene p.30 (1985)]**PEER REVIEWED**

MEDICATION
**PEER REVIEWED**

MEDICATION (VET)
**PEER REVIEWED**

Used in the preparation of insecticidal fumigants.
[Hayes, W.J., Jr., E.R. Laws, Jr., (eds.). Handbook of Pesticide Toxicology. Volume 2. Classes of Pesticides. New York, NY: Academic Press, Inc., 1991.690]**PEER REVIEWED**

Trichloroethylene was used earlier as an extraction solvent for natural fats and oils, such as palm, coconut and soya bean oils. It was also an extraction solvent for spices, hops and the decaffeination of coffee. The United States Food and Drug Administration banned these uses of trichloroethylene...its use in cosmetic and drug products was also discontinued...It was used as both an anesthetic and an analgesic in obstetrics. /Former uses/
[IARC. Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Man. Geneva: World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1972-PRESENT. (Multivolume work).V63 (95) 80]**PEER REVIEWED**

Trichloroethylene has been used, in limited quantities, to control relative molecular mass in the manufacture of polyvinyl chloride. It has also been used as a solvent in the rubber industry, some adhesive formulations and in research laboratories. In the textile industry, it is used as a carrier solvent for spotting fluids and as a solvent in dyeing and finishing. It is also used as a solvent in printing inks, paint, lacquers, varnishes, adhesives and paint strippers.
[IARC. Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Man. Geneva: World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1972-PRESENT. (Multivolume work).V63 (95) 80]**PEER REVIEWED**

The major use of trichloroethylene is in metal cleaning or degreasing. Trichloroethylene is used in degreasing operations in five main industrial groups: furniture and fixtures, fabricated metal products, electric and electronic equipment, transport equipment and miscellaneous manufacturing industries. It is also used in plastics, appliances, jewellery, automobile, plumbing fixtures, textiles, paper, glass and printing industries.
[IARC. Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Man. Geneva: World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1972-PRESENT. (Multivolume work).V63 (95) 80]**PEER REVIEWED**

Used as a chemical intermediate in the synthesis of captafol; chloroacetic acid; 1-chloro-2,2,2-trifluoroethane
[Ashford, R.D. Ashford's Dictionary of Industrial Chemicals. London, England: Wavelength Publications Ltd., 1994.905]**PEER REVIEWED**

Stabilized grades are produced for vapor cleaning applications
[Ashford, R.D. Ashford's Dictionary of Industrial Chemicals. London, England: Wavelength Publications Ltd., 1994.905]**PEER REVIEWED**

Use of trichloroethylene in fluorocarbon production and as a metal cleaning and degreasing solvent are both increasing. In vapor degreasing, trichloroethylene has regained some market share as a result of the phaseout of 1,1,1-trichloroethane for emissive uses. Growth prospects for trichloroethylene as a fluorocarbon feedstock hold more potential, however, particularly its use as a precursor for the workhorse hydrofluorocarbon product, HFC-134a.
[Chemical Marketing Reporter; Chemical Profile Trichloroethylene. Dec 8, 1997. NY, NY: Schnell Pub Co (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Manufacturers:

Dow Chemical USA, Hq, 2030 Dow Center, Midland, MI 48674, (517) 636-1000; Production site: Freeport, TX 77541
[SRI International. 2000 Directory of Chemical Producers -- United States. SRI Consulting, Menlo Park: CA 2000946]**PEER REVIEWED**

PPG Industries, Inc., Hq, One PPG Place, 36 East, Pittsburgh, PA 15272, (412) 434-3131; Chemicals Group; Production site: Lake Charles, LA 70602
[SRI International. 2000 Directory of Chemical Producers -- United States. SRI Consulting, Menlo Park: CA 2000946]**PEER REVIEWED**

Methods of Manufacturing:

Until 1968, about 85% of United States production capacity of trichloroethylene was based on acetylene. The acetylene-based process consists of two steps: acetylene is first chlorinated to 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane, with a ferric chloride, phosphorus chloride or antimony chloride catalyst, and the product is then dehydrohalogenated to trichloroethylene. The current method of manufacture is from ethylene or 1,2-dichloroethane. In a process used by one plant in the United States, trichloroethylene is produced by noncatalytic chlorination of ethylene dichloride and other C2 hydrocarbons with a mixture of oxygen and chlorine or hydrogen chloride.
[IARC. Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Man. Geneva: World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1972-PRESENT. (Multivolume work).V63 (95) 79]**PEER REVIEWED**

Ethylene dichloride + chlorine (chlorination; coproduced with perchloroethylene)
[Ashford, R.D. Ashford's Dictionary of Industrial Chemicals. London, England: Wavelength Publications Ltd., 1994.905]**PEER REVIEWED**

Ethylene dichloride + chlorine + oxygen (oxychlorination/dehydrochlorination; coproduced with perchloroethylene)
[Ashford, R.D. Ashford's Dictionary of Industrial Chemicals. London, England: Wavelength Publications Ltd., 1994.905]**PEER REVIEWED**

General Manufacturing Information:

Since there are now only two producers (Dow & PPG), the USITC stopped publicly reporting production and other statistics at the end of 1982
[CHEMICAL PRODUCTS SYNOPSIS: Trichloroethylene, 1985]**PEER REVIEWED**

Depending on the condition, dissociation of HCl at elevated temperatures in the presence of carbon in a chemical plasma will produce 1,1,2-trichloroethane, 1,2-dichloroethane, trichloroethylene, and perchloroethylene.
[Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology. 3rd ed., Volumes 1-26. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, 1978-1984.V12 1008 (1980)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Cancelled for use in fumigant mixture or as a solvent with other ingredient on grains.
[Farm Chemicals Handbook 2000. Willoughby, OH: Meister Publishing Co. p. C 394 (2000)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Formulations/Preparations:

Trichloroethylene for medicinal purposes may contain thymol as a preservative. Industrial grades ... may contain stabilizers, such as triethanolamine.
[Budavari, S. (ed.). The Merck Index - An Encyclopedia of Chemicals, Drugs, and Biologicals. Whitehouse Station, NJ: Merck and Co., Inc., 1996.1643]**PEER REVIEWED**

Grades: USP; technical; high purity; electronic; metal degreasing; extraction.
[Lewis, R.J., Sr (Ed.). Hawley's Condensed Chemical Dictionary. 13th ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1997. 1125]**PEER REVIEWED**

Trichloroethylene is available in the USA in high-purity, electronic USP, technical, metal degreasing and extraction grades
[IARC. Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Man. Geneva: World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1972-PRESENT. (Multivolume work).V20 545 (1979)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Commercial grades of trichloroethylene, formulated to meet use requirements, differ in the amount and type of added inhibitor. Typical grades contain >99% trichloroethylene; they include a neutrally inhibited vapor-degreasing grade and a technical grade for use in formulations.
[IARC. Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Man. Geneva: World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1972-PRESENT. (Multivolume work).V63 (95) 76]**PEER REVIEWED**

Stabilizers that have been used in formulations of trichloroethylene include neutral inhibitors and free-radical scavengers, amyl alcohol, n-propanol, isobutanol, 2-pentanol, diethylamine, triethylamine, dipropylamine, diisopropylamine, diethanolamine, triethanolamine, morpholine, N-methylmorpholine, aniline, acetone, ethyl acetate, borate esters, ethylene oxide, propylene oxide, 1,2-epoxybutane, cyclohexene oxide, butadiene dioxide, styrene oxide, pentene oxide, 2,3-epoxy-1-propenol, 3-methoxy-1,2-epoxypropane, stearates, 2,2,4-trimethyl-1-pentene, 2-methyl-1,2-epoxypropanol, epoxycyclopentanol, epichlorohydrin, tetrahydrofuran, tetrahydropyran, 1,4-dioxane, dioxalane, trioxane, alkoxyaldehyde hydrazones, methyl ethyl ketone, nitromethanes, nitropropanes, phenol, ortho-cresol, thymol, para-tert-butylphenol, para-tert-amylphenol, isoeugenol, pyrrole, N-methylpyrrole, N-ethylpyrrole, (2-pyrryl)trimethylsilane, glycidyl acetate, isocyanates and thiazoles.
[IARC. Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Man. Geneva: World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1972-PRESENT. (Multivolume work).V63 (95) 76]**PEER REVIEWED**

Impurities:

Acidity (as hydrochloric acid), 0.0005% max; alkalinity (as sodium hydroxide), 0.001% max; residue on evaporation, 0.005% max; antioxidants, such as amine (0.001-0.01% or more) or combinations of epoxides such as epichlorohydrin & esters (0.2-2% total)
[IARC. Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Man. Geneva: World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1972-PRESENT. (Multivolume work).V20 547 (1979)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Apart from added stabilizers, commercial grades of trichloroethylene should not contain more than the following amounts of impurities: water, 100 ppm; acidity (as HCl), 5 ppm; insoluble residue, 10 ppm. Free chlorine should not be detectable.
[IARC. Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Man. Geneva: World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1972-PRESENT. (Multivolume work).V63 (95) 76]**PEER REVIEWED**

Impurities that have been found in commercial trichloroethylene products include: carbon tetrachloride, chloroform, 1,2-dichloroethane, trans-1,2-dichloroethylene, cis-1,2-dichloroethylene, pentachloroethane, 1,1,1,2-tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, 1,1,2-trichloroethane, 1,1-dichloroethylene, tetrachloroethylene, bromodichloromethane, bromodichloroethylene, and benzene.
[IARC. Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Man. Geneva: World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1972-PRESENT. (Multivolume work).V63 (95) 76]**PEER REVIEWED**

Consumption Patterns:

Demand: (1982): 240 million pounds; (1983): Est 235 million pounds; 1987: Est 215 million pounds.
[Kavaler. Chem Market Reporter (1983)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Vapor degreasing of fabricated metal parts, 80%; chemical intermediate, 5%; miscellaneous used, 5%; exports, 10% (1985)
[CHEMICAL PROFILE: Trichloroethylene, 1986]**PEER REVIEWED**

Vapor degreasing of fabricated metal parts, 66%; chemical intermediates, miscellaneous domestic uses, 5%; exports, 22%.
[Kavaler. Chem Market Reporter (1983)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Vapor degreasing of fabricated metal parts, 65%; chemical intermediates and miscellaneous uses, 35%.
[Chemical Marketing Reporter; Chemical Profile Trichloroethylene. Dec 8, 1997. NY, NY: Schnell Pub Co (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Demand: 1996: 180 million pounds; 1997: 190 million pounds; 2001: 230 million pounds (includes exports)
[Chemical Marketing Reporter; Chemical Profile Trichloroethylene. Dec 8, 1997. NY, NY: Schnell Pub Co (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

U. S. Production:

USA production: (1981): 258,182 pounds.
[United States International Trade Commission. Synthetic Organic Chemicals-- United States Production and Sales, 1981. USITC Publications 1291 Washington, DC: United States International Trade Commission, 1981.1132]**PEER REVIEWED**

Production quantities (1976): 610X10+6 pounds.
[Fishbein L; Potential Indust Carcins and Mutagens p.35 (1977) USEPA 560/ 5-77-005]**PEER REVIEWED**

(1985) 7.72X10+10 g /Estimated/
[CHEMICAL PRODUCTS SYNOPSIS: Trichloroethylene, 1985]**PEER REVIEWED**

(1991) 320 million lb
[SRI. 1992 Directory of Chemical Producers-United States of America. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International, 1992.1032]**PEER REVIEWED**

U. S. Imports:

(1985) 1.98X10+10 g
[BUREAU OF THE CENSUS. U.S. IMPORTS FOR CONSUMPTION AND GENERAL IMPORTS 1985 p.1-584]**PEER REVIEWED**

Imports last year totaled approximately 10 million pounds, averaging 12 million pounds during the period.
[Chemical Marketing Reporter; Chemical Profile Trichloroethylene. Dec 8, 1997. NY, NY: Schnell Pub Co (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

U. S. Exports:

(1985) 1.06X10+10 g
[BUREAU OF THE CENSUS. U.S. EXPORTS, SCHEDULE E, 1985 p.2-69]**PEER REVIEWED**

Exports were 65 million pounds during 1996, but averaged 83 million pounds per year in the 1992-1996 period.
[Chemical Marketing Reporter; Chemical Profile Trichloroethylene. Dec 8, 1997. NY, NY: Schnell Pub Co (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Laboratory Methods:

Clinical Laboratory Methods:

GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY USED TO DETERMINE HUMAN SERUM AND ADIPOSE TISSUE LEVELS OF VOLATILE PURGEABLE HALOGENATED HYDROCARBONS.
[PEOPLES AJ ET AL; PREPR PAP NATL MEET--AM CHEM SOC DIV ENVIRON CHEM 18 (2): 485-6 (1978)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Practical recommendation for the biologic monitoring of exposure to trichloroethylene is as following: Biological parameter: trichloroethanol. Biological material: Urine. /SRP: Permissable/ value: 150 mg/g creatinine /From table/
[Klaassen, C.D., M.O. Amdur, Doull J. (eds.). Casarett and Doull's Toxicology. The Basic Science of Poisons. 5th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1995.1000]**PEER REVIEWED**

Practical recommendation for the biologic monitoring of exposure to trichloroethylene is as following: Biological parameter: trichloroacetic acid. Biological material: plasma. Permissable value: 5 mg/100 ml /After 5-day exposure, from table/
[Klaassen, C.D., M.O. Amdur, Doull J. (eds.). Casarett and Doull's Toxicology. The Basic Science of Poisons. 5th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1995.1000]**PEER REVIEWED**

Practical recommendation for the biologic monitoring of exposure to trichloroethylene is as following: Biological parameter: trichloroethanol. Biological material: plasma. Permissable value: 0.25 mg/100 ml /After 5-day exposure, from table/
[Klaassen, C.D., M.O. Amdur, Doull J. (eds.). Casarett and Doull's Toxicology. The Basic Science of Poisons. 5th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1995.1000]**PEER REVIEWED**

Matrix: breath; conventional reference range: < 1 ppm; international recommended reference range: <8 umolar
[Tietz, N.W. (ed.). Clinical Guide to Laboratory Tests. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders Co., 1983.112]**PEER REVIEWED**

A method is presented which is suitable for the analysis of certain halocarbons in blood and tissue samples. Among these halocarbons is ... trichloroethylene. ... Blood samples are warmed and an inert gas is passed through the sample to extract the volatile halocarbons. Treated samples are macerated in water, then treated the same as for blood samples. A Tenax gas chromatography cartridge is used to trap the vapors which are then recovered by thermal desorption and analyzed on gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. The limits of detection of this method are approximately 3 ng/ml for a 10 ml blood sample and 6 ng/g for 5 g tissue samples.
[Pellizzari ED et al; Environmental Carcinogens Selected Methods of Analysis 7: 435-44 (1985)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Analytic Laboratory Methods:

RECOVERIES WERE FROM FORTIFIED WHEAT SAMPLES, USING GAS LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHIC COLUMN & ELECTRON CAPTURE DETECTOR.
[CLOWER M JR; J ASSOC OFF ANAL CHEM 63 (3): 539 (1980)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Trichloroethylene in grain is analyzed by gas chromatography with source-heated electron capture detector and glass-lined injection block. Construct calibration curve daily of peak heights against ng fumigant/125 ml acetone for suitable range.
[Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official Methods of Analysis. 15th ed. and Supplements. Washington, DC: Association of Analytical Chemists, 1990VI 290-1]**PEER REVIEWED**

Trichloroethylene in spice oleoresins is analyzed by gas chromatographic method.
[Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official Methods of Analysis. 15th ed. and Supplements. Washington, DC: Association of Analytical Chemists, 1990VII 1175]**PEER REVIEWED**

Fujiwara Test: Trichloroethylene is treated with pyridine in an alkaline environment. Solution absorbance is then determined at 535 or 470 nm (absorptivity: 18-32 l/g/cm with a sensitivity of about 1 mg/kg.
[WHO; Environ Health Criteria 50: Trichloroethylene p.22 (1985)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Infra-red spectroscopy: In the gaseous phase, quantities are determined by measuring the optical density at the selected wavelength of 11.8 um. ... This corresponds to a detection sensitivity of not less than 0.5 ug/l.
[Fishbein L; Chromatography of Environmental Hazards Vol 2, pp.471-90 (1973) as cited in WHO; Environ Health Criteria 50: Trichloroethylene p.22 (1985)]**PEER REVIEWED**

High-resolution gas chromatography with electron capture detector/mass spectrophotometry...for determination of trichloroethylene in soil /has been utilized/ as a confirmatory technique with a detection threshold of approximately 10 mg/kg (10 ppm).
[DeLeon IR et al; J Chromatogr Sci 18: 85-8 (1980) as cited in WHO; Environ Health Criteria 50: Trichloroethylene p.26 (1985)]**PEER REVIEWED**

EPA Method 8010. Direct Injection or Purge and Trap Gas Chromatography with halogen-specific detector for the analysis of halogenated volatile organics including trichloroethylene in solid waste. Under the prescribed conditions for trichloroethylene, the method has a detection limit of 0.12 ug/l. Precision and method accuracy were found to be directly related to the concentration of the parameter and essentially independent of the sample matrix.
[USEPA; Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste SW-846 (1986)]**PEER REVIEWED**

EPA Method 502.1. Volatile Halogenated Organic Compounds in Water by Purge and Trap Gas Chromatography. Revision 2.0. Analysis by GC with electrolytic conductivity detection. Detection limit= 0.001 ug/l in drinking water.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC# 4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

EPA Method 502.2. Volatile Organic Compounds in Water by Purge and Trap Capillary Column Gas Chromatography with Photoionization and Electrolytic Conductivity Detectors in Series. Revision 2.0. Detection limit= 0.01 ug/l in drinking water.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC# 4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

EPA Method 503.1. Volatile Aromatic and Unsaturated Organic Compounds in Water by Purge and Trap Gas Chromatography" Revision 2.0 Analysis by gas chromatography with photoionization detection. Detection limit= 0.01 ug/l in drinking water.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC# 4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

EPA Method 524.1. Measurement of Purgeable Organic Compounds in Water by Packed Column Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry. Revision 3.0. Detection limit= 0.4 ug/l in drinking water.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC# 4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

EPA Method 524.2. Measurement of Purgeable Organic Compounds in Water by Capillary Column Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry. Revision 4.0. Detection limit= 0.19 ug/l in drinking water.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC# 4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

EPA Method 551. Determination of Chlorination Disinfection Byproducts and Chlorinated Solvents in Drinking Water by Liquid-Liquid Extraction and Gas Chromatography with Electron-Capture Detection. Detection limit= 0.002 ug/l in drinking water.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC# 4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

EPA Method 601. Purgeable Halocarbons in Wastewater by Gas Chromatography with Electrolytic Conductivity Detection. Detection limit= 0.120 ug/l in drinking water.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC# 4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

EPA Method 624. Protocol for the Analysis of Purgeable Organic Priority Pollutants in Industrial and Municipal Wastewater. Detection limit= 1.9 ug/l in wastewater.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC# 4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

EPA Method 8240. Determination of Volatile Organics Compounds by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS). Estimated quantitation limit= 5 ug/l.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC# 4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

EPA Method 8021. Analysis of Halogenated and Aromatic Volatiles By Gas Chromatography using Electrolytic Conductivity and Photoionization Detectors in Series: Capillary Column Technique. Detection limit= 0.01-0.02 ug/l.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC# 4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

EPA Method 8260B. Volatile Organic Compounds by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS): Capillary Column Technique.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC# 4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

EPA Method 1624. Volatile Organic Compounds by Isotope Dilution GCMS. Detection limit= 2 ug/kg in soil.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC# 4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

NIOSH Method: 3701. Analtye: Trichloroethylene. Matrix: Air. Procedure: Gas chromatography (portable), photoionization detector. For trichloroethylene this method has an estimated detection limit of 0.25 ng/injection/sample. The precision/RSD is 0.078 and the recovery is not given. Applicability: The working range is 10 to 1000 ppm (54 to 5100 mg/cu m) in relatively non-complex atmospheres where trichloroethylene is known to be present. Interferences: None found.
[U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods. 4th ed. Methods A-Z & Supplements. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, Aug 1994.]**PEER REVIEWED**

NIOSH Method: 1022. Analyte: Trichloroethylene. Matrix: Air. Procedure: Gas chromatography, flame ionization detector. For trichloroethylene this method has an estimated detection limit of 0.01 mg/sample. The precision/RSD is 0.038 @ 1.6 to 6.4 mg/sample and the recovery is not given. Applicability: The working range is 27 to 875 ppm (150 to 4700 mg/cu m for a 3.4 liter air sample. Interferences: None studied.
[U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods. 4th ed. Methods A-Z & Supplements. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, Aug 1994.]**PEER REVIEWED**

Gas chromatograph/mass spectrometric analysis of volatiles including trichloroethylene. The Contract Required Quantitation Limits are 5.0 ug/kg in solids at low level, 500 ug/kg in solids at medium level, and 5 ug/l in water as used in EPA Contract Laboratory Program.
[USEPA/OST; List of Lists: A Catalog of Analytes and Methods p.510 (1991) OST Pub 21W-4005]**PEER REVIEWED**

EPA Method 0-3115. Purge and trap gas chromatography/mass spectrometric method for the determination of organic substances including trichloroethylene in water and fluvial sediments. The estimated detection limit is 3 ug/l as used in US Geological Survey Techniques of Water Resources.
[USEPA/OST; List of Lists: A Catalog of Analytes and Methods p.510 (1991) OST Pub 21W-4005]**PEER REVIEWED**

Sampling Procedures:

Water samples were collected in 125 ml serum vial that had been cleaned by detergent wash, distilled water rinse, dichromic acid wash, and oven-drying at 150 deg C. Vials were completely filled and stored at 4 deg C. Minimum loss occurred during storage at 4 deg C up to 28 days.
[Dietz EA, Singley KF; Anal Chem 51: 1809-14 (1979) as cited in USEPA; Health Assessment Document: Trichloroethylene p.3-13 (1984) EPA-600/8-82-006B]**PEER REVIEWED**

Sampling ... /is conducted by utilizing/ activated carbon felt badges.
[Hirayama T, Ikeda M; Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 40: 1091-6 (1979) as cited in WHO; Environ Health Criteria 50: Trichloroethylene p.26 (1985)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Sampling ... /is conducted by utilizing/ activated carbon tubes.
[Shipman AJ, Whim BP; Ann Occupat Hyg 23: 197-204 (1980) as cited in WHO; Environ Health Criteria 50: Trichloroethylene p.26 (1985)]**PEER REVIEWED**

EPA Method 8010. For the analysis of solid waste, a representative sample (solid or liquid) is collected in a standard 40-ml glass screw-cap VOA vial equipped with a Teflon-faced silicone septum. Sample agitation, as well as contamination of the sample with air, must be avoided. Two vials are filled per sample location, then placed in separate plastic bags for shipment and storage.
[USEPA; Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste SW-846 (1986)]**PEER REVIEWED**

NIOSH Method: 3701. Analyte: Trichloroethylene. Matrix: Air. Sampler: Air bag (Tedlar). Flow Rate: 0.02 to 0.05 l/min or higher; fill bag to equal to or greater than 80% of capacity; spot samples possible. Sample Stability: Bags should be analyzed as soon after collection as possible (equal to or greater than 4 hrs).
[U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods. 4th ed. Methods A-Z & Supplements. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, Aug 1994.]**PEER REVIEWED**

NIOSH Method: 1022. Analyte: Trichloroethylene. Matrix: Air. Sampler: Solid sorbent tube (coconut shell charcoal 100 mg/50 mg). Flow Rate: 0.01 to 0.2 l/min. Sample Size: 3.4 liters. Shipment: Routine. Sample Stability: Not determined.
[U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods. 4th ed. Methods A-Z & Supplements. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, Aug 1994.]**PEER REVIEWED**

Special References:

Special Reports:

Health and Safety Executive Monograph: Trichloroethylene #6 (1982).

USEPA; Ambient Water Quality Criteria Document: Trichloroethylene (1980) EPA-440/5/80-007.

NTP; Division of Toxicology Research and Testing; Management Status Report; 07/22/92; p.27. NTP TR No 002; Route: oral, gavage; Species: rats and mice. NTIS No PB264122/AS.

WHO; Environ Health Criteria 50: Trichloroethylene (1985).

Municipal Environmental Research Laboratory; USEPA, Survey of Two Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants for Toxic Substances, March (1977)

DHHS/ATSDR; Toxicological Profile for Trichloroethylene (Update) TP-92/19 (1993)

NTP TR No 243; Route: gavage; Species: rats and mice. NTIS No PB91111815/AS.
[NTP; Division of Toxicology Research and Testing; Management Status Report; 07/07/93; p.272]

Bruening T; Bolt HM; Critical Reviews in Toxicology 30 (3): 253-285 (2000). Renal toxicity and carcinogenicity of trichloroethylene: Key results, mechanisms, and controversies.

Lash LH; Parker JC; Scott CS; Environ Health Perspect 108 (2): 225-240 (2000). Modes of action of trichloroethylene for kidney tumorigenesis.

Moore MM; Harrington-Brock K; Environmental Health Perspectives 108 (2): 215-223 (2000). Mutagenicity of trichloroethylene and its metabolites: implications for the risk assessment of trichloroethylene.

Wartenberg D; Reyner D; Scott C; Environmental Health Perspectives 108 (2): 161-176 (2000). Trichloroethylene is an organic chemical that has been used in dry cleaning, for metal degreasing, and as a solvent for oils and resins. It has been shown to cause liver and kidney cancer in experimental animals. This article reviews over 80 published papers and letters on the cancer epidemiology of people exposed to trichloroethylene.

U.S. Department of Health & Human Services/National Toxicology Program; Tenth Report on Carcinogens. National Institutes of Environmental Health Sciences. The Report on Carcinogens is an informational scientific and public health document that identifies and discusses substances (including agents, mixtures, or exposure circumstances) that may pose a carcinogenic hazard to human health. Trichloroethylene (79-01-6) was first listed in the Ninth Report on Carcinogens (2000) as reasonably anticipated to be a human carcinogen.

Synonyms and Identifiers:

Synonyms:

ACETYLENE TRICHLORIDE
**PEER REVIEWED**

AI3-00052
**PEER REVIEWED**

ALGYLEN
**PEER REVIEWED**

ANAMENTH
**PEER REVIEWED**

BENZINOL
**PEER REVIEWED**

Caswell No 876
**PEER REVIEWED**

CECOLENE
**PEER REVIEWED**

CHLORILEN
**PEER REVIEWED**

1-CHLORO-2,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE
**PEER REVIEWED**

Chlorylea, Chorylen, CirCosolv, Crawhaspol, Dow-Tri, Dukeron, Per-A-Clor, Triad, Trial, TRI-Plus M, Vitran
**PEER REVIEWED**

DENSINFLUAT
**PEER REVIEWED**

1,1-Dichloro-2-chloroethylene
**PEER REVIEWED**

Pesticide Code: 081202
**QC REVIEWED**

EPA Pesticide Chemical Code 081202
**PEER REVIEWED**

ETHENE, TRICHLORO-
**PEER REVIEWED**

ETHINYL TRICHLORIDE
**PEER REVIEWED**

ETHYLENE TRICHLORIDE
**PEER REVIEWED**

ETHYLENE, TRICHLORO-
**PEER REVIEWED**

FLECK-FLIP
**PEER REVIEWED**

FLOCK FLIP
**PEER REVIEWED**

FLUATE
**PEER REVIEWED**

GERMALGENE
**PEER REVIEWED**

LANADIN
**PEER REVIEWED**

LETHURIN
**PEER REVIEWED**

NARCOGEN
**PEER REVIEWED**

NARKOSOID
**PEER REVIEWED**

NCI-C04546
**PEER REVIEWED**

NIALK
**PEER REVIEWED**

NSC 389
**PEER REVIEWED**

PERM-A-CHLOR
**PEER REVIEWED**

PETZINOL
**PEER REVIEWED**

PHILEX
**PEER REVIEWED**

THRETHYLEN
**PEER REVIEWED**

THRETHYLENE
**PEER REVIEWED**

TRETHYLENE
**PEER REVIEWED**

TRI
**PEER REVIEWED**

TRIASOL
**PEER REVIEWED**

Trichloraethen (German)
**PEER REVIEWED**

Trichloraethylen, tri (German)
**PEER REVIEWED**

TRICHLORAN
**PEER REVIEWED**

TRICHLOREN
**PEER REVIEWED**

Trichlorethene (French)
**PEER REVIEWED**

TRICHLORETHYLENE
**PEER REVIEWED**

Trichlorethylene, tri (French)
**PEER REVIEWED**

TRICHLOROETHENE
**PEER REVIEWED**

1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHYLENE
**PEER REVIEWED**

TRICLENE
**PEER REVIEWED**

Tricloretene (Italian)
**PEER REVIEWED**

Tricloroetilene (Italian)
**PEER REVIEWED**

Trielin
**PEER REVIEWED**

Trielina (Italian)
**PEER REVIEWED**

TRIKLONE
**PEER REVIEWED**

TRILENE
**PEER REVIEWED**

TRIMAR
**PEER REVIEWED**

TRI-PLUS
**PEER REVIEWED**

VESTROL
**PEER REVIEWED**

Formulations/Preparations:

Trichloroethylene for medicinal purposes may contain thymol as a preservative. Industrial grades ... may contain stabilizers, such as triethanolamine.
[Budavari, S. (ed.). The Merck Index - An Encyclopedia of Chemicals, Drugs, and Biologicals. Whitehouse Station, NJ: Merck and Co., Inc., 1996.1643]**PEER REVIEWED**

Grades: USP; technical; high purity; electronic; metal degreasing; extraction.
[Lewis, R.J., Sr (Ed.). Hawley's Condensed Chemical Dictionary. 13th ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1997. 1125]**PEER REVIEWED**

Trichloroethylene is available in the USA in high-purity, electronic USP, technical, metal degreasing and extraction grades
[IARC. Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Man. Geneva: World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1972-PRESENT. (Multivolume work).V20 545 (1979)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Commercial grades of trichloroethylene, formulated to meet use requirements, differ in the amount and type of added inhibitor. Typical grades contain >99% trichloroethylene; they include a neutrally inhibited vapor-degreasing grade and a technical grade for use in formulations.
[IARC. Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Man. Geneva: World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1972-PRESENT. (Multivolume work).V63 (95) 76]**PEER REVIEWED**

Stabilizers that have been used in formulations of trichloroethylene include neutral inhibitors and free-radical scavengers, amyl alcohol, n-propanol, isobutanol, 2-pentanol, diethylamine, triethylamine, dipropylamine, diisopropylamine, diethanolamine, triethanolamine, morpholine, N-methylmorpholine, aniline, acetone, ethyl acetate, borate esters, ethylene oxide, propylene oxide, 1,2-epoxybutane, cyclohexene oxide, butadiene dioxide, styrene oxide, pentene oxide, 2,3-epoxy-1-propenol, 3-methoxy-1,2-epoxypropane, stearates, 2,2,4-trimethyl-1-pentene, 2-methyl-1,2-epoxypropanol, epoxycyclopentanol, epichlorohydrin, tetrahydrofuran, tetrahydropyran, 1,4-dioxane, dioxalane, trioxane, alkoxyaldehyde hydrazones, methyl ethyl ketone, nitromethanes, nitropropanes, phenol, ortho-cresol, thymol, para-tert-butylphenol, para-tert-amylphenol, isoeugenol, pyrrole, N-methylpyrrole, N-ethylpyrrole, (2-pyrryl)trimethylsilane, glycidyl acetate, isocyanates and thiazoles.
[IARC. Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Man. Geneva: World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1972-PRESENT. (Multivolume work).V63 (95) 76]**PEER REVIEWED**

Shipping Name/ Number DOT/UN/NA/IMO:

UN 1710; Trichloroethylene

IMO 6.1; Trichloroethylene

Standard Transportation Number:

49 411 71; Trichloroethylene

EPA Hazardous Waste Number:

U228; A toxic waste when a discarded commercial chemical product or manufacturing chemical intermediate or an off-specification commercial chemical product or manufacturing chemical intermediate.

F002; A hazardous waste from nonspecific sources when a spent solvent.

D040; A waste containing trichloroethylene may or may not be characterized as a hazardous waste following testing by the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure as prescribed by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) regulations.

 

Administrative Information:

Hazardous Substances Databank Number: 133
Last Revision Date: 20030829
Last Review Date: Reviewed by SRP on 1/20/2001

Update History:

Complete Update on 2003-08-29, 1 fields added/edited/deleted
Complete Update on 03/05/2003, 3 fields added/edited/deleted.
Field Update on 02/14/2003, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Field Update on 11/08/2002, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 10/16/2002, 2 fields added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 08/06/2002, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 05/13/2002, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 01/14/2002, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 08/09/2001, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 05/23/2001, 92 fields added/edited/deleted.
Field Update on 05/15/2001, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Field Update on 09/12/2000, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 02/08/2000, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 02/02/2000, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 01/11/2000, 8 fields added/edited/deleted.
Field Update on 11/18/1999, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Field Update on 09/21/1999, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 06/03/1999, 3 fields added/edited/deleted.
Field Update on 05/17/1999, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Field Update on 05/04/1999, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 03/29/1999, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 02/01/1999, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 01/20/1999, 2 fields added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 11/16/1998, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 11/12/1998, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 06/02/1998, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 10/17/1997, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 05/08/1997, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 03/27/1997, 2 fields added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 03/11/1997, 3 fields added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 02/26/1997, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 01/09/1997, 2 fields added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 10/12/1996, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 06/27/1996, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 06/11/1996, 2 fields added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 05/17/1996, 2 fields added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 04/16/1996, 29 fields added/edited/deleted.
Field Update on 01/18/1996, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Field Update on 09/26/1995, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Field Update on 09/26/1995, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Field Update on 08/31/1995, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Field Update on 08/21/1995, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Field Update on 04/20/1995, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Field Update on 04/20/1995, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Field Update on 01/24/1995, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Field Update on 12/19/1994, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Field Update on 08/04/1994, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 05/05/1994, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 03/25/1994, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 02/02/1994, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 01/12/1994, 92 fields added/edited/deleted.
Field Update on 11/05/1993, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Field Update on 09/16/1993, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Field Update on 08/03/1993, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Field update on 12/11/1992, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 08/17/1992, 87 fields added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 04/27/1992, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 01/23/1992, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 09/26/1991, 2 fields added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 10/22/1990, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 06/28/1990, 12 fields added/edited/deleted.
Field Update on 05/14/1990, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Field Update on 01/15/1990, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 01/11/1990, 9 fields added/edited/deleted.
Field Update on 05/05/1989, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Field Update on 03/01/1989, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 09/23/1988, 2 fields added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 08/18/1988, 114 fields added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 07/24/1985
Created 19830401 by GCF

GLCC RELATED TOXIC SUBSTANCES FOUND IN THE CAMP POND AND CAMP WATER WELL 2003 AND 2004

GREAT LAKES CHEMICAL CORPORATION AND THE PATHFINDERS CAMP