INFORMATION REGARDING TETRACHLOROETHYLENE

http://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/cgi-bin/sis/search/f?./temp/~AnpzYV:1
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CASRN: 127-18-4

Human Health Effects:

Evidence for Carcinogenicity:

Evaluation: There is limited evidence in humans for the carcinogenicity of tetrachloroethylene. There is sufficient evidence in experimental animals for the carcinogenicity of tetrachloroethylene. Overall evaluation: Tetrachloroethylene is probably carcinogenic to humans (Group 2A). In making the overall evaluation, the working group considered the following evidence: (1) Although tetrachloroethylene is known to induce peroxisome proliferation in mouse liver, a poor quantitative correlation was seen between peroxisome proliferation and tumor formation in the liver after administration of tetrachloroethylene by inhalation. The spectrum of mutations in proto-oncogenes in liver tumors from mice treated with tetrachloroethylene is different from that in liver tumors from mice treated with trichloroethylene. (2) The cmpd induced leukemia in rats. (3) Several epidemiological studies showed elevated risks for esophageal cancer, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and cervical cancer.
[IARC. Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Man. Geneva: World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1972-PRESENT. (Multivolume work).63 204 (1995)]**PEER REVIEWED**

A3. A3= Animal carcinogen.
[American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. Threshold Limit Values (TLVs) for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices (BEIs) for 1995-1996. Cincinnati, OH: ACGIH, 1995.28]**PEER REVIEWED**

Human Toxicity Excerpts:

... acute hepatic necrosis and oliguric uremia have followed human exposure.
[Gosselin, R.E., R.P. Smith, H.C. Hodge. Clinical Toxicology of Commercial Products. 5th ed. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1984.II-165]**PEER REVIEWED**

/CNS depressant/ ... in high concentrations. Defatting action on skin can lead to dermatitis.
[The Merck Index. 10th ed. Rahway, New Jersey: Merck Co., Inc., 1983.1315]**PEER REVIEWED**

Excessive exposure ... has resulted in effects on the central nervous system, mucous membranes, eyes, & skin, & to a lesser extent the lungs, liver, kidneys. The effects most frequently noted have been on the nervous system. Unconsciousness, dizziness, headache, vertigo or light ... /CNS depression/ have occurred in many instances after occupational exposures.
[American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices. 5th ed. Cincinnati, OH: American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 1986.464]**PEER REVIEWED**

Perchloroethylene has been reported to produce effects on the liver in humans. The concn ... generally appeared to be in excess of 100 ppm.
[American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Inc. Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values, 4th ed., 1980. Cincinnati, Ohio: American Conference of Governmmental Industrial Hygienists, Inc., 1980.325]**PEER REVIEWED**

Several studies of the effects of prolonged exposure to perchloroethylene vapors on human volunteers are avail. ... Prolonged exposure to 200 ppm results in early signs of CNS depression, while there was no response in men or women repeatedly exposed to 100 ppm for 7 hr/day. Clinical chemical studies indicate no liver or kidney effects at these levels but massive exposure to concentrations causing unconsciousness have resulted in proteinuria & hematuria.
[American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices. 5th ed. Cincinnati, OH: American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 1986.464]**PEER REVIEWED**

A CASE OF CNS DEPRESSION & 2 CASES OF ACUTE OLIGURIC UREMIA AFTER INHALATION OF PERCHLORETHYLENE VAPORS FROM NEWLY CLEANED CLOTHES IN A SELF-SERVICE DRY-CLEANING MACHINE ARE REPORTED.
[LARSEN NA ET AL; UGESKR LAEG 139 (5): 270-5 (1977)]**PEER REVIEWED**

A PT IS REPORTED WHO HAD A CONNECTIVE TISSUE TYPE OF DISEASE CLINICALLY SIMILAR TO VINYL CHLORIDE DISEASE, POSSIBLY CAUSED BY ABNORMAL SENSITIVITY TO PERCHLORETHYLENE TO WHICH HE WAS EXPOSED IN HIS OCCUPATION.
[SPARROW GP; CLIN EXP DERMATOL 2 (1): 17-22 (1977)]**PEER REVIEWED**

CHANGES IN NEUROLOGICAL NATURE OF WORKERS EXPOSED TO TETRACHLOROETHYLENE AT GREATER THAN MAC (MAXIMUM PERMISSIBLE CONCENTRATION) WERE RELATED TO DEFECTIVE ACTION OF LIVER & SUPRARENAL GLAND CORTEX. INCR IN AMINOTRANSFERASE IN BLOOD SERUM & SLIGHT SHIFTS IN PROTEINOGRAMS OBSERVED.
[CHMIELEWSKI J ET AL; BULL INST MARIT TROP MED GDYNIA 27 (2): 197-205 (1976)]**PEER REVIEWED**

SIX WK OLD BREAST-FED INFANT HAD OBSTRUCTIVE JAUNDICE & HEPATOMEGALY. TETRACHLOROETHYLENE WAS DETECTED IN MILK & BLOOD. AFTER DISCONTINUANCE OF BREAST-FEEDING RAPID CLINICAL & BIOCHEM IMPROVEMENT WERE NOTED.
[BAGNELL PC, ELLENBERGER HA; CAN MED ASSOC J 117 (9): 1047-8 (1977)]**PEER REVIEWED**

LYMPHOCYTES FROM 10 FACTORY WORKERS EXPOSED TO TETRACHLOROETHYLENE FOR 3 MO TO 18 YR SHOWED NO SIGNIFICANT DOSE-RELATED CHANGES IN CHROMOSOME ABERRATIONS, SISTER CHROMATID EXCHANGE RATE, PROPORTION OF M2+M3 METAPHASES OR MITOTIC INDEX, COMPARED WITH CONTROLS.
[IKEDA M ET AL; TOXICOLOGY LETTERS 5: 251 (1980)]**PEER REVIEWED**

A new form of substance abuse in adolescents is the inhalation of fumes from typewriter correction fluids (Liquid Paper, Wite-Out, Snopake, etc), which are composed of various chlorinated solvents, /including tetrachloroethylene/, to induce euphoria. Medical complications of such abuse and medical management of acute toxic episodes are discussed herein, along with suggestions for controlling this substance abuse.
[Greer JE; South Med J 77 (3): 297-8 (1984)]**PEER REVIEWED**

After ingestion of 12-16 g tetrachloroethylene, a 6 year old boy was admitted to the clinic in coma. In view of the high initial tetrachloroethylene blood level, hyperventilation therapy was performed. Under this therapeutic regimen, the clinical condition of the patient improved considerably. The tetrachloroethylene blood level profile which was determined under hyperventilation therapy could be computer fitted to a two compartment model. Elimination of tetrachloroethylene from the blood compartment occurred via a rapid and a slow process with half-lives of 30 min and 35 hours, respectively. These values compared favorably with the half-lives of 160 min and 33 hours under normal respiratory conditions. During hyperventilation therapy, the relative contribution to the fast elimination process increased from 70% for physiological minute volume to 99.9%. A minor fraction of the ingested dose was excreted with the urine (integral of 1% during the first 3 days). In contrast to previous results, trace amounts of unchanged tetrachloroethylene were detected in the urine besides trichloroacetic acid and trichloroethanol.
[K'oppel C et al; J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 23 (2-3): 103-15 (1985)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Pulmonary edema occurred in a laundry worker who was found unconscious after exposure to tetrachloroethylene vapor. ... Multiple premature ventricular contractions in otherwise healthy workers have been reported in occupational tetrachloroethylene exposures, but no direct link with sudden death has been made. Chronic exposure has not produced cardiovascular toxicity.
[Ellenhorn, M.J. and D.G. Barceloux. Medical Toxicology - Diagnosis and Treatment of Human Poisoning. New York, NY: Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Inc. 1988.986-7]**PEER REVIEWED**

A 68 year old launderette worker was anesthetised & suffered erythema & 30% superficial burns after spilling a container of tetrachloroethylene over his clothes. The defatting property of tetrachloroethylene would lead to cracking of damaged skin.
[Reynolds, J.E.F., Prasad, A.B. (eds.) Martindale-The Extra Pharmacopoeia. 28th ed. London: The Pharmaceutical Press, 1982.107]**PEER REVIEWED**

A 21 year old man who had been exposed to fumes of tetrachloroethylene developed acute pulmonary edema & became comatose. He received isoprenaline 800 ug in 1 l of dextrose injection iv, furosemide 40 mg, aminophylline 250 mg, & dexamethasone 10 mg iv. Oxygen was admin. After 6 hr, improvement was noted. No evidence of liver or kidney damage was seen.
[Reynolds, J.E.F., Prasad, A.B. (eds.) Martindale-The Extra Pharmacopoeia. 28th ed. London: The Pharmaceutical Press, 1982.107]**PEER REVIEWED**

... Residual organ damage is not commonly observed in humans who have been exposed to large quantities of the compound. Tetrachloroethylene was formerly used widely as an intestinal anthelminthic. ... Oral doses of 2.8 to 4.0 ml given for this purpose were quite effective & safe. Inebriation was the only troublesome side effect that was noted in 46,000 treated patients. Inhalation of tetrachloroethylene sufficient to produce inebriation & unconsciousness has failed to elicit hepatic, renal, or hematological abnormalities in some individuals. However, in other cases, mild to severe hepatotoxicity has been diagnosed. In most such instances, liver injury was not manifest until several days after exposure. Recovery was uneventful, but sometimes prolonged, particularly in the more severe cases. Tetrachloroethylene was quite slowly eliminated, in that approx 1 ppm tetrachloroethylene was measured in the breath of victims as long as 11 to 12 days after exposure. Little evidence of kidney injury or damage of any other organ was noted in any of the aforementioned cases. ...
[National Research Council. Drinking Water and Health. Volume 3. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1980.136]**PEER REVIEWED**

Acute exposure to tetrachloroethylene by inhalation results in central nervous system depression. Liver & kidney toxicity have been reported as effects of acute exposures to very high doses. In dry cleaners chronically exposed to tetrachloroethylene, incr levels of markers of early renal damage &/or dysfunction were attributed to the exposure.
[IARC. Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Man. Geneva: World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1972-PRESENT. (Multivolume work).V63 191 (1995)]**PEER REVIEWED**

To evaluate the risk of cancer & other diseases among workers engaged in aircraft manufacturing & potentially exposed to cmpds containing chromate, trichloroethylene (TCE), perchloroethylene (PCE), & mixed solvents. A retrospective cohort mortality study was conducted of workers employed for at least 1 year at a large aircraft manufacturing facility in California on or after 1 January 1960. The mortality experience of these workers was determined by exam of national, state, & company records to the end of 1996. Standardised mortality ratios (SMRs) were evaluated comparing the observed numbers of deaths among workers with those expected in the general population adjusting for age, sex, race, & calendar year. The SMRs for 40 cause of death categories were computed for the total cohort & for subgroups defined by sex, race, position in the factory, work duration, yr of first employment, latency, and broad occupational groups. Factory job titles were classified as to likely use of chemicals, & internal Poisson regression analyses were used to compute mortality risk ratios for categories of yr of exposure to chromate, TCE, PCE, & mixed solvents, with unexposed factory workers serving as referents. RESULTS: The study cohort comprised 77,965 workers who accrued nearly 1.9 million person-years of follow up (mean 24.2 yr). Mortality follow up, estimated as 99% complete, showed that 20,236 workers had died by 31 December 1996, with cause of death obtained for 98%. Workers experienced low overall mortality (all causes of death SMR 0.83) & low cancer mortality (SMR 0.90). No significant increases in risk were found for any of the 40 specific cause of death categories, whereas for several causes the numbers of deaths were significantly below expectation. Analyses by occupational group & specific job titles showed no remarkable mortality patterns. Factory workers estimated to have been routinely exposed to chromate were not at increased risk of total cancer (SMR 0.93) or of lung cancer (SMR 1.02). Workers routinely exposed to TCE, PCE, or a mixture of solvents also were not at increased risk of total cancer (SMRs 0.86, 1.07, & 0.89, respectively), & the numbers of deaths for specific cancer sites were close to expected values. Slight to moderately increased rates of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma were found among workers exposed to TCE or PCE, but none was significant. A significant incr in testicular cancer was found among those with exposure to mixed solvents, but the excess was based on only six deaths & could not be linked to any particular solvent or job activity. Internal cohort analyses showed no significant trends of increased risk for any cancer with increasing years of exposure to chromate or solvents. The results from this large scale cohort study of workers followed up for over 3 decades provide no clear evidence that occupational exposures at the aircraft manufacturing factory resulted in increases in the risk of death from cancer or other diseases. Our findings support previous studies of aircraft workers in which cancer risks were generally at or below expected levels.
[Boice JD Jr et al; Occup Environ Med 56 (9): 581-597 (1999)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Skin, Eye and Respiratory Irritations:

Eye exposure can lead to conjunctivitis; Skin exposure can lead to inflamation; Inhalation can lead to respiratory tract irritation.
[ITII. Toxic and Hazarous Industrial Chemicals Safety Manual. Tokyo, Japan: The International Technical Information Institute, 1982.507]**PEER REVIEWED**

Tetrachloroethylene vapor is a mucous membrane & upper resp irritant at levels above 75 to 100 ppm.
[Ellenhorn, M.J. and D.G. Barceloux. Medical Toxicology - Diagnosis and Treatment of Human Poisoning. New York, NY: Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Inc. 1988.986]**PEER REVIEWED**

Drug Warnings:

VET: AT ONE TIME IT WAS USED FAIRLY EXTENSIVELY AGAINST GI PARASITES OF RUMINANTS. ITS DISADVANTAGE IN RUMINANTS IS NECESSITY OF STIMULATING CLOSURE OF ESOPHAGEAL GROOVE SO THAT MEDICATION IS DELIVERED DIRECTLY TO ABOMASUM RATHER THAN PASSING INTO RUMEN WHICH ... REDUCES EFFECTIVENESS OF DRUG. ... NO FOOD OR WATER SHOULD BE ALLOWED FOR 12-18 HR BEFORE & FOR 4 HR AFTER DOSING. ... /IT/ IS CONTRAINDICATED IN TAPEWORM-INFECTED ANIMALS SINCE IRRITATION OF THESE WORMS MAY RESULT IN THEIR BALLING UP & OCCLUDING DIGESTIVE PASSAGE. IT IS ... CONTRAINDICATED IN ANIMALS WITH DISTEMPER ... & SHOULD NOT BE ADMIN TO NURSING ANIMALS OR THOSE WEIGHING LESS THAN 2 LB (APPROX 1 KG).
[Booth, N.H., L.E. McDonald (eds.). Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 5th ed. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press, 1982.839]**PEER REVIEWED**

VET: RESTRICT DIETARY FAT WITHIN 2 DAYS BEFORE AND AFTER USE TO AVOID ENHANCED ABSORPTION OF THIS FAT SOL LIVER TOXICANT. CONTRAINDICATED IN FEBRILE DISEASES OR IN DEBILITATED ANIMALS. STRONG MUCOSAL IRRITANT. BREAKING CAPSULES IN MOUTH HAS PRODUCED ATAXIA, CONVULSIONS, AND ANESTHESIA.
[Rossoff, I.S. Handbook of Veterinary Drugs. New York: Springer Publishing Company, 1974.587]**PEER REVIEWED**

Food and Environmental Agents: Effect on Breast-Feeding: Tetrachloroethylene-cleaning fluid (perchloroethylene): Obstructive jaundice, dark urine. /from Table 7/
[Report of the American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs in Pediatrics 93 (1): 142 (1994)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Medical Surveillance:

Periodical exam of the liver and kidneys.
[ITII. Toxic and Hazarous Industrial Chemicals Safety Manual. Tokyo, Japan: The International Technical Information Institute, 1982.508]**PEER REVIEWED**

Exhaled air was analyzed for tetrachloroethene in teachers and 4-5 year old pupils of a kindergarten situated near a factory, and in residents of an old folks home situated near a former chemical waste dump. The tetrachloroethene concentrations were higher in the exhaled air of children living near the factory (mean 24 ug/cu m, n= 6) than in control children (mean 2.8 ug/cu m, n= 11). In the old folks home, the tetrachloroethene concentrations in the exhaled air of people living on the first floor were higher (mean 7.8 ug/cu m, n= 10) than in the exhaled air of the people living on the second floor and higher (mean 1.8 ug/cu m, n= 19). From the results of this study, it is clear that in environmental exposure to tetrachloroethene, biological monitoring of exhaled air is a simple, efficient, effective, and convenient method of assessing total ambient exposure of both young and aged subjects.
[Monster AC, Smolders JF; Int Arch Occup Environ Health 53 (4): 331-6 (1984)]**PEER REVIEWED**

PRECAUTIONS FOR "CARCINOGENS": ... in relation specifically to cancer hazards, there are at present no health monitoring methods that may ensure the early detection of preneoplastic lesions or lesions which may precede them. Whenever medical surveillance is indicated, in particular when exposure to a carcinogen has occurred, ad hoc decisions should be taken concerning additional tests that might become useful or mandatory. /Chemical Carcinogens/
[Montesano, R., H. Bartsch, E.Boyland, G. Della Porta, L. Fishbein, R. A. Griesemer, A.B. Swan, L. Tomatis, and W. Davis (eds.). Handling Chemical Carcinogens in the Laboratory: Problems of Safety. IARC Scientific Publications No. 33. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1979.23]**PEER REVIEWED**

Populations at Special Risk:

... individuals with diseases of the heart, liver, kidneys, and lung.
[ITII. Toxic and Hazarous Industrial Chemicals Safety Manual. Tokyo, Japan: The International Technical Information Institute, 1982.508]**PEER REVIEWED**

Probable Routes of Human Exposure:

Currently at risk of exposure are more than 500,000 workers, primarily in the dry cleaning & textile industries, which use more than 2/3 of the domestically produced tetrachloroethylene.
[Ellenhorn, M.J. and D.G. Barceloux. Medical Toxicology - Diagnosis and Treatment of Human Poisoning. New York, NY: Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Inc. 1988.986]**PEER REVIEWED**

NIOSH (NOES Survey 1981-1983) has statistically estimated that 536,688 workers (139,308 of these are female) are potentially exposed to tetrachloroethylene in the US(1). Occupational exposure to tetrachloroethylene may occur through inhalation and dermal contact with this compound at workplaces where tetrachloroethylene is produced or used(SRC). The mean concn of tetrachloroethylene in alveolar air in 18 workers at 12 dry cleaning stores was 73 mg/cu m(2). The general population may be exposed to tetrachloroethylene via inhalation of ambient air, ingestion of food and drinking water(SRC).
[(1) NIOSH; National Occupational Exposure Survey (NOES) (1983) (2) Verberk MM, Scheffers TML; Environ Res 21: 432-7 (1980)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Body Burden:

Tetrachloroethylene was detected in 7 of 8 samples in mother's milk from 4 urban areas in the US(1). One hour after a visit to a dry cleaning plant, one sample of mother's milk contained 10 ppm tetrachloroethylene. This decreased to 3 ppm after 24 hr(2). Tetrachloroethylene was detected in expired breath and blood from 9 individuals living in Love Canal, NY at 600-4,500 ng/cu m and 0.35-260 ng/ml, respectively(3). Tetrachloroethylene was detected in human body fat (8 subjects) 0.4-29.2 ppb and various human organs less than 6 ng/g(4). The mean concn of tetrachloroethylene in alveolar air in 136 residents living near 12 dry-cleaning stores were: living equal to or <5 floors above the stores 5 mg/cu m, adjacent houses 1 mg/cu m, one house away 0.2 mg/cu m, across street <.1 mg/cu m, whereas the mean concn in 18 workers from these stores was 73 mg/cu m(5).
[(1) Pellizzari ED et al; Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 28: 322-8 (1982) (2) Jensen AA; Res Rev 89: 1-128 (1983) (3) Barkley J et al; Biomed Mass Spectrom 7: 139-47 (1980) (4) McConnell G et al; Endeavour 34: 13-8 (1975) (5) Verberk MM, Scheffers TML; Environ Res 21: 432-7 (1980)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Whole blood, USA survey of 250 (121 males, 129 females), 0.7-23 ppb, 2.4 ppb avg(1). Breath samples (ug/cu m, weighted statistics), Elizabeth and Bayonne, NJ, 1981, 295-339 samples, 93% pos, 280 max, 13.0 avg, 6.8 median(2). Alveolar air in children and teachers in school situated near factory were 24 ug/cu m avg for children and 11 and 47 ug/cu m for the teachers(3). The mean concentration of tetrachloroethylene in the classroom was 13 ug/cu m(3). Alveolar air of residents of a nursing home situated near a former chemical waste dump averaged 7.8 ug/cu m first floor and 1.8 ug/cu m on the second floor, where ambient concentrations averaged 8.2 and 1.6 ug/cu m, respectively(3). USA FY82 National Human Adipose Tissue Survey specimens, 46 composites, 61% pos (>3 ppb, wet tissue concn), 94 ppb max(4).
[(1) Antoine SR et al; Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 36: 364-71 (1986) (2) Wallace L et al; J Occup Med 28: 603-7 (1986) (3) Monster AC, Smolders JFJ; Int Arch Environ Health 53: 331-6 (1984) (4) Stanley JS; Broad Scan Analysis of the FY82 National Human Adipose Tissue Survey Specimens Vol. I Executive Summary p. 5 USEPA-560/5-86-035 (1986)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Average Daily Intake:

The AVDI of tetrachloroethylene measured in 8 urban areas of Japan was reported as 21 ug (inhalation) and 0.84 ug (ingestion)(1).
[(1) Yoshida K; Chemosphere 27: 621-30 (1993)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Animal Toxicity Studies:

Evidence for Carcinogenicity:

Evaluation: There is limited evidence in humans for the carcinogenicity of tetrachloroethylene. There is sufficient evidence in experimental animals for the carcinogenicity of tetrachloroethylene. Overall evaluation: Tetrachloroethylene is probably carcinogenic to humans (Group 2A). In making the overall evaluation, the working group considered the following evidence: (1) Although tetrachloroethylene is known to induce peroxisome proliferation in mouse liver, a poor quantitative correlation was seen between peroxisome proliferation and tumor formation in the liver after administration of tetrachloroethylene by inhalation. The spectrum of mutations in proto-oncogenes in liver tumors from mice treated with tetrachloroethylene is different from that in liver tumors from mice treated with trichloroethylene. (2) The cmpd induced leukemia in rats. (3) Several epidemiological studies showed elevated risks for esophageal cancer, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and cervical cancer.
[IARC. Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Man. Geneva: World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1972-PRESENT. (Multivolume work).63 204 (1995)]**PEER REVIEWED**

A3. A3= Animal carcinogen.
[American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. Threshold Limit Values (TLVs) for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices (BEIs) for 1995-1996. Cincinnati, OH: ACGIH, 1995.28]**PEER REVIEWED**

Non-Human Toxicity Excerpts:

UNCONSCIOUSNESS WAS OBSERVED IN RATS WITHIN FEW MIN @ CONCN OF 6000 PPM OR MORE & AFTER SERVERAL HOURS AT 3000 PPM, BUT UNCONSCIOUSNESS WAS NOT OBSERVED AT 2000 PPM. AT THESE HIGH-LEVEL SINGLE EXPOSURES, THE PREDOMINANT RESPONSE WAS ... DEPRESSION OF NERVOUS SYSTEM. THERE WERE SLIGHT CHANGES IN LIVER, CHARACTERIZED BY SLIGHT INCR IN WT, SLIGHT INCR IN TOTAL LIPID, AND SLIGHT CLOUDY SWELLING.
[Clayton, G. D. and F. E. Clayton (eds.). Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology: Volume 2A, 2B, 2C: Toxicology. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley Sons, 1981-1982.3562]**PEER REVIEWED**

EXCESSIVE ABSORPTION OF DRUG WILL RESULT IN DIZZINESS AND INCOORDINATION ... AND EVEN DEATH.
[Jones, L.M., et al. Veterinary Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 4th ed. Ames: Iowa State University Press, 1977.1034]**PEER REVIEWED**

IN HOST MEDIATED ASSAY IN MICE, USING SALMONELLA TYPHIMURIUM TA1950, TA1951 AND TA1952, THERE WAS A SIGNIFICANT INCR IN NUMBER OF REVERTANTS WITH DOSES EQUIV TO LD50 & HALF THE LD50, BUT THIS WAS NOT DOSE RELATED. ... THERE WAS NO INDUCTION OF CHROMOSOMAL ABERRATIONS IN BONE MARROW CELLS OF MICE THAT HAD RECEIVED EITHER SINGLE (HALF LD50) OR 5 DAILY IP INJECTIONS (1/6 LD50) OF ... /TETRACHLOROETHYLENE/.
[IARC. Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Man. Geneva: World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1972-PRESENT. (Multivolume work).V20 503 (1979)]**PEER REVIEWED**

... pregnant mice and rats /were exposed/ to concn of 300 ppm. Both species were exposed for /periods of/ 7 hours daily, on days 6 through 15 of gestation. No fetal toxicity or teratogenicity was detected.
[Shepard, T.H. Catalog of Teratogenic Agents. 5th ed. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986.547]**PEER REVIEWED**

... behavioral tests /were performed/ on the offspring of rats exposed to 100 ppm for 7 hr daily on days 14-20 of gestation ... no changes ... /were observed in/ the control pups. At exposure levels of 900 ppm the maternal animals gained less weight and the offspring performed less well on neuromotor tests and had lower levels of brain acetylcholine and dopamine. Pair fed controls were not used.
[Shepard, T.H. Catalog of Teratogenic Agents. 5th ed. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986.547]**PEER REVIEWED**

GROUPS OF 50 MALE & 50 FEMALE B6C3F1 MICE, APPROX 5 WK OLD ... WERE ADMIN TETRACHLOROETHYLENE IN CORN OIL BY GAVAGE ON 5 CONSECUTIVE DAYS/WK FOR 78 WK. ... TIME-WEIGHTED AVG DOSES WERE 536 AND 1072 MG/KG BODY WT/DAY IN MALES & 386 AND 772 MG/KG BODY WT/DAY IN FEMALES. GROUPS OF 20 MALE AND 20 FEMALE MICE WERE EITHER UNTREATED OR RECEIVED CORN OIL ALONE. ... THE SHORTER LIFESPAN IN TREATED ANIMALS WAS DUE TO EARLY TOXICITY & HIGH INCIDENCES OF HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMAS IN ANIMALS OF BOTH SEXES ...
[IARC. Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Man. Geneva: World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1972-PRESENT. (Multivolume work).V20 497 (1979)]**PEER REVIEWED**

... ONLY A NEARLY LETHAL /ORAL/ DOSE (4 G/KG BODY WT) CAUSED SWELLING OF THE CONVOLUTED /KIDNEY/ TUBULES AND HYDROPIC DEGENERATION IN MALE MICE ... IP DOSES OF 1.6-2.3 G/KG BODY WT ... CAUSED SLIGHT CALCIFICATION OF THE TUBULES OF THE KIDNEY IN DOGS ...
[IARC. Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Man. Geneva: World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1972-PRESENT. (Multivolume work).V20 502 (1979)]**PEER REVIEWED**

MALE RATS WERE EXPOSED FOR 4 HR TO VARIOUS CONCN OF TETRACHLOROETHYLENE. THE ENZYMES SGOT, SGPT, AND OCT WERE MARKEDLY ELEVATED AS A RESULT OF EXPOSURE.
[DREW RT ET AL; TOXICOL APPL PHARMACOL 45 (3): 809-20 (1978)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Rats inhalation: No pathological effects @ 70 ppm, 8 hr/day, 5 days/wk, 7 mo; Some pathological changes in liver and kidneys @ 230 ppm, 8 hr/day, 5 days/wk, 7 mo.
[Verschueren, K. Handbook of Environmental Data of Organic Chemicals. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1983.1080]**PEER REVIEWED**

/Tetrachloroethylene was not/ mutagenic ... in 2 strains of Salmonella typhimurium in the presence of a postmitochondrial mouse liver supernatant, following exposure to vapors ...
[Bartsch H et al; Arch Toxicol 41 (4): 249-78 (1979)]**PEER REVIEWED**

The cardiac effects of tetrachloroethylene ... were studied in several species. To standardize the dosimetry, tetrachloroethylene was prepared for iv injection in soln of Tween 80, which had no demonstratable cardiotoxicity. In rabbits under urethane anesthesia and in cats and dogs under pentobarbital anesthesia, tetrachloroethylene increased the vulnerability of the ventricles to epinephrine induced extrasystoles, bigeminal rhythms, and tachycardia. The mean threshold doses of tetrachloroethylene were 10 mg/kg in rabbits, 24 mg/kg in cats, and 13 mg/kg in dogs. In rabbits this threshold dose for cardiac arrhythmias corresponded to blood levels between 2.2 and 3.6 ug/ml. Animals demonstrating a reflex bradycardia to vasopressor doses of epinephrine were relatively resistant to the arrhythmogenic action of tetrachloroethylene. Ventricular arrhythmias occurred in less than 30% of the animals after tetrachloroethylene alone. In cats higher doses of tetrachloroethylene (40 mg/kg) produced acute pulmonary edema. Tetrachloroethylene (30-40 mg/kg) decreased left intraventricular dP/dt (max) in dogs, without significantly increasing left intraventricular end diastolic pressure, although there was a transient decrease in arterial blood pressure that accompanied the early phase of myocardial depression.
[Kobayashi S et al; J Toxicol Environ Health 10: 23-30 (1982)]**PEER REVIEWED**

A study was designed to determine the effects of tetrachloroethylene on the phyto- and zooplankton community at initial concentrations of 1.2 and 0.44 mg/l in separated compartments of an experimental pond. Measurements in the surrounding water were made simultaneously to detect possible effects of compartmentalization. Residues as low as 0.1 mg/l could be analyzed 5 days (low dose) and 38 days (high dose) post-application. In all applied biotopes, a lethal effect on the Daphnia population was detected. The phytoplankton community showed an increase of relative abundance and a decrease in species diversity. Studies of the frequency distribution of 6 selected phytoplankton species. (Spirogyra species, Microcystis flos-aquae, Stichococcus bacillaris, Nitzschia acicularis, Chilomonas parameium, Actinophrys species) demonstrated the total elimination of at least 4 species from the treated compartments. In spite of different dosing, only weak differences were found in toxic effects between the low and high dosed compartments. No significant chemically induced effect was observed on the physicochemical properties of the treated water.
[Lay JP et al; Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 13 (2): 135-42 (1984)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Exptl momentary spraying of rabbits eyes with tetrachloroethylene from a pressurized fire extinguisher from a distance of 1 foot caused immediate pain & blepharospasm. The corneal epithelium became granular & optically irregular, & patches of epithelium were lost, but the eyes recovered completely within 2 days.
[Grant, W.M. Toxicology of the Eye. 3rd ed. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas Publisher, 1986.888]**PEER REVIEWED**

Results of the mutagenicity test using L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells were positive for tetrachlorethylene.
[NTP; Fiscal Year 1987 Annual Plan p.82 (1987) NTP-87-001]**PEER REVIEWED**

Oxidative DNA damage is emerging as an biomarker of effect in studies assessing the health risks of occupational chemicals. Trichloroethylene (TCE) & perchloroethylene (PERC) are used in the dry cleaning industry & their metab can produce reactive oxygen cmpds. The present study examined the potential for TCE & PERC to induce oxidative DNA damage in rats that was detectable as increased urinary excretion of 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine (8OHdG). Thiobarbaturic acid reactive substances (TBARS) & 8-epiprostaglandin F2alpha (8epiPGF) were also measured as biomarkers of increased oxidative stress. Male Fischer rats were admin a single i.p. injection of 0, 100, 500, or 1000 mg/kg of PERC or TCE. Control rats received only vehicle (1:4 v/v of Alkamuls/water). A positive control group received 100 mg/kg 2-nitropropane (2NP). Rats were sacrificed 24 hr after dosing. In rats receiving 2NP or TCE but not PERC, TBARS & the 8OHdG/dG ratios were significantly elevated in liver. Lymphocyte 8OHdG/dG was not affected significantly by 2NP, TCE or PERC. In rats receiving 2NP, urinary excretion of 8OHdG & 8epiPGF2 were significantly increased. In rats receiving TCE or PERC, significant increases in 8epiPGF2 or 8OHdG were not evident. Results indicate that a single high dose of TCE, but not PERC, can induce an increase in oxidative DNA damage in rat liver. However, the usefulness of 8OHdG as a biomarker of TCE-induced oxidative DNA damage is questionable.
[Toraason M et al; Toxicology 138 (1): 43-53 (1999)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Rats, rabbits, and monkeys withstood 7 hr exposures to 400 ppm tetrachloroethylene vapor 5 days/week for 6 months without apparent adverse effects on mortality, growth, body and organ weights, and periodic clinical chemistry determinations. However, guinea pigs could tolerate repeated 7 hr exposures at concentrations no higher than 100 ppm.
[Hayes, W.J., Jr., E.R. Laws, Jr., (eds.). Handbook of Pesticide Toxicology. Volume 2. Classes of Pesticides. New York, NY: Academic Press, Inc., 1991.697]**PEER REVIEWED**

Rats died within a few minutes of inhaling a vapor concentration of 30,000 ppm tetrachloroethylene and in about 30 min at 19,000 ppm. Death was narcotic in nature. A series of essentially straight lines was obtained when log concentration was plotted against log time for exposures to tetrachloroethylene that were just sufficient to cause lethality in rats, just small enough to be survived by all rats, and just small enough to cause no organic injury. A concentration of 2000 ppm was tolerated for up to 14 hr, and 3000 ppm was tolerated for 4 hr with no deaths. Unconsciousness was produced in rats within a few minutes at concentrations of 6000 ppm or greater and after several hr at 3000 ppm was tolerated for 4 hr with no deaths. Unconsciousness was produced in rats within a few minutes at concentrations of 6000 ppm or greater and after several hours at 3000 ppm, but unconsciousness was not observed at 2000 ppm.
[Hayes, W.J., Jr., E.R. Laws, Jr., (eds.). Handbook of Pesticide Toxicology. Volume 2. Classes of Pesticides. New York, NY: Academic Press, Inc., 1991.697]**PEER REVIEWED**

National Toxicology Program Studies:

The bioassay of USP grade tetrachloroethylene for possible carcinogenicity was conducted using Osborne-Mendel rats and B6C3F1 mice. Tetrachloroethylene in corn oil was admin by gavage at either of two dosages to groups of 50 male and 50 female animals of each species, 5 days/wk, over a period of 78 wk followed by an observation period of 32 wk for rats and 12 wk for mice. Initial dosage levels for the chronic bioassay were selected on the basis of a preliminary subchronic toxicity test. Subsequent dosage adjustments were made during the course of the chronic bioassay. The high and low time weighted avg dosages of tetrachloroethylene in the chronic study were 941 and 471 mg/kg/day for the male rats, 949 and 474 mg/kg/day for the female rats, 1072 and 536 mg/kg/day for the male mice, and 772 and 386 mg/kg/day for the female mice. For each species, 20 animals of each sex were placed on test as vehicle controls. These animals were gavaged with corn oil at the same time that dosed animals were gavaged with tetrachloroethylene mixtures. Twenty animals of each sex were placed on test as untreated controls for each species. These animals received no gavage treatments. No significant incr incidence of neoplastic lesions was observed in treated rats. ... In both male and female mice, admin of tetrachloroethylene was associated with a significantly incr incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatocellular carcinomas were observed in 2/17 (12%) untreated control males, 2/20 (10%) untreated control females, 0/20 vehicle control females, 19/48 (40%) low dose females, and 19/48 (40%) high dose females. Hepatocellular carcinomas metastasized to the kidney in one untreated control male and to the lung in three low dose males, one low dose female, and one high dose female. ... The results of the bioassay of tetrachloroethylene in Osborne-Mendel rats do not allow an evaluation of the carcinogenicity of this cmpd due to the high rate of early death among the treated animals. However, under the condition of this study, tetrachloroethylene was a liver carcinogen in B6C3F1 mice of both sexes. Levels of Evidence of Carcinogenicity: Male Rats: Inadequate study; Female Rats: Inadequate study; Male Mice: Positive; Female Mice: Positive.
[DHEW/NCI; Bioassay of Tetrachloroethylene for Possible Carcinogenicity (1977) Technical Rpt Series No. 13 DHEW Pub No. (NIH) 77-813]**PEER REVIEWED**

Toxicology and carcinogenesis studies of tetrachloroethylene (99.9%) pure were conducted by inhalation exposure of groups of 50 male and 50 female F344/N rats and B6C3F1 mice 6 hr/day 5 days/wk for 103 wk. The exposure concn used (0, 200 or 400 ppm for rats and 0, 100 or 200 ppm for mice) were selected on the basis of results from a 13 wk inhalation study. ... During the 2 yr studies, exposure to tetrachloroethylene did not consistently affect body wt gains in either rats or mice. ... Both concns of tetrachloroethylene were associated with incr incidences of mononuclear cell leukemia in male rats (28/50; 37/50; 37/50). In female rats, tetrachloroethylene incr the incidence of leukemia (18/50; 30/50; 29/50) and decr the time to occurrence of the disease. Tetrachloroethylene produced renal tubular cell karyomegaly in male and female rats, renal tubular cell hyperplasia in male rats, and renal tubular cell adenomas and adenocarcinomas (combined) in male rats (1/49; 3/49; 4/50). The incidence of renal tubular cell tumors was statistically significant; these uncommon tumors have been consistently found at low incidences in male rats in other 2 yr studies of chlorinated ethanes and ethylenes. One low dose male rat had a kidney lipoma, and another had a nephroblastoma. Four high dose male and two high dose female rats had gliomas of the brain, whereas one control male and one control female had this tumor. In male and female mice, tetrachloroethylene caused dose related incr in the incidences of hepatocellular neoplasms. In males, tetrachloroethylene at 200 ppm incr the incidence of hepatocellular adenomas (11/49; 8/49; 18/50) and at both concn incr the incidence of hepatocellular carcinomas (7/49; 25/49; 26/50). In female mice, tetrachloroethylene at both concn incr the incidences of hepatocellular carcinoma (1/48; 13/50; 36/50). Tetrachloroethylene also produced renal cell karomegaly in both sexes of mice, and one low dose male mouse had a tubular cell adenocarcinoma. In these inhalation studies, there was no neoplastic changes in the respiratory tracts of either species, but there was an incr in the incidence of squamous metaplasia in the nasal cavities in dosed male rats (0/50; 5/50; 5/50). ... Under the conditions of these 2 yr inhalation bioassays, there was clear evidence of the carcinogenicity of tetrachloroethylene for male F344/N rats as shown by incr incidence of mononuclear cell leukemia and uncommon renal tubular cell neoplasms. There was some evidence of carcinogenicity of tetrachloroethylene for female F344/N rats as shown by incr incidences of mononuclear cell leukemia. There was clear evidence of carcinogenicity for B6C3F1 mice as shown by incr incidences of both hepatocellular adenomas and carcinomas in males and of hepatocellular carcinomas in females.
[DHHS/NTP; Toxicology & Carcinogenesis Studies of Tetrachloroethylene in F344/N Rats and B6C3F1 Mice (Inhalation Studies) Technical Report Series No. 311 (1986) NIH Publication No. 86-2567]**PEER REVIEWED**

Non-Human Toxicity Values:

LD50 Oral Mouse 6000-8571 mg/kg body weight LD50 Oral Rat 2400-13000 mg/kg bw
[IARC. Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Man. Geneva: World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1972-PRESENT. (Multivolume work).V63 191 (1995)]**PEER REVIEWED**

LC50 Rat inhalation 4100 ppm/6 hr LC50 Rat inhalation 5000 ppm/8 hr LC50 Mouse inhalation 5200 ppm/4 hr LC50 Mouse inhalation 2978 ppm/6 hr
[IARC. Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Man. Geneva: World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1972-PRESENT. (Multivolume work).V63 191 (1995)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Ecotoxicity Values:

LC50 Poecilia reticulata (guppy) 18 ppm/7 days /Conditions of bioassay not specified/
[Verschueren, K. Handbook of Environmental Data of Organic Chemicals. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1983.1080]**PEER REVIEWED**

LC50 Pimephales promelas (fathead minnow) 18.4 mg/l/96 hr (flow-through bioassay)
[Verschueren, K. Handbook of Environmental Data of Organic Chemicals. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1983.1080]**PEER REVIEWED**

LC50 Pimephales promelas (fathead minnow) 21.4 mg/l/96 hr (static bioassay)
[Verschueren, K. Handbook of Environmental Data of Organic Chemicals. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1983.1080]**PEER REVIEWED**

LC50 LEPOMIS MACROCHIRUS (BLUEGILL SUNFISH) 46 MG/L/24 HR AT 21-23 DEG C (95% CONFIDENCE LIMIT 11-15 MG/L) /CONDITIONS OF BIOASSAY NOT SPECIFIED/
[BUCCAFUSCO RJ ET AL; BULL ENVIRONM CONTAM TOXICOL 26: 446 (1981)]**PEER REVIEWED**

LC50 LEPOMIS MACROCHIRUS (BLUEGILL SUNFISH) 13 MG/L/96 HR AT 21-23 DEG C (95% CONFIDENCE LIMIT 11-15 MG/L) /CONDITIONS OF BIOASSAY NOT SPECIFIED/
[BUCCAFUSCO RJ ET AL; BULL ENVIRONM CONTAM TOXICOL 26: 446 (1981)]**PEER REVIEWED**

LC50 Daphnia magna (water flea) 18 mg/l/48 hr, static bioassay, at 22 deg C
[Le Blanc GA; Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 24: 684-91 (1980) as cited in WHO; Environ Health Criteria: Tetrachloroethylene p.15 (1984)]**PEER REVIEWED**

LC50 Salmo gairdneri (rainbow trout) 5 mg/l/96 hr, static bioassay at 12 deg C
[Shubat PJ et al; Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 28: 7-10 (1982) as cited in WHO; Environ Health Criteria: Tetrachloroethylene p.24 (1984)]**PEER REVIEWED**

LC50 Limanda limanda (dab) 5 mg/l/96 hr, flow-through bioassay
[Pearson CR, McConnell G; Proc R Soc Land B 189: 305-32 (1975) as cited in WHO; Environ Health Criteria: Tetrachloroethylene p.24 (1984)]**PEER REVIEWED**

LC50 Tanytarsus dissimilis (midge) 30, 840 ug/l/48 hr, static bioassay
[USEPA; Task 11, Contract No 68-01-3887 (1980) as cited in USEPA; Ambient Water Quality Criteria Doc: Tetrachloroethylene p.B-1 (1980) EPA 440/5-80-073]**PEER REVIEWED**

LC50 Lepomis macrochirus (bluegill sunfish) 12,900 ug/l/96 hr, static bioassay
[USEPA; Contract No 68-01-4646 (1978) as cited in USEPA; Ambient Water Quality Criteria Doc: Tetrachloroethylene p.B-2 (1980) EPA 440/5-80-073]**PEER REVIEWED**

TSCA Test Submissions:

The ability of tetrachloroethylene to induce morphological transformation in the BALB/3T3 mouse cell line (Cell Transformation assay) was evaluated. Based on preliminary toxicity test determinations (exposure time=3 days), tetrachloroethylene was tested at 0, 2, 10, 50 and 250 ug/ml, with cell survival ranging from 100% to 51% relative to untreated controls. None of the tested concentrations produced significantly greater transformation frequencies relative to untreated controls.
[Arthur D. Little, Inc.; Cell Transformation Assays of 11 Chlorinated Hydrocarbon Analogs. (1983), EPA Document No. 40-8324457, Fiche No. OTS0509392 ]**QC REVIEWED**

The mutagenicity of tetrachloroethylene was evaluated in Salmonella tester strains TA98, TA100, TA1535 and TA1537 (Ames Test), both in the presence and absence of added metabolic activation by Aroclor-induced rat liver S9 fraction. Tetrachloroethylene did not cause a positive response in any of the tester strains with or without added metabolic activation. Tetrachloroethylene was evaluated using a protocol in which the test article was usually tested over a minimum of 6 dose levels, the highest nontoxic dose level being 10 mg/plate unless solubility, mutagenicity or toxicity dictated a lower upper limit.
[SRI International; Investigations of the Species Sensitivity and Mechanism of Carcinogenicity of Halogenated Hydrocarbons. (1984), EPA Document No. 40-8424225, Fiche No. OTS0509408 ]**QC REVIEWED**

The ability of tetrachloroethylene to induce DNA repair in the hepatocyte primary culture (HPC) system was evaluated using hepatocytes from male B6C3F1 mice and Osborne-Mendel rats. In both the mouse and rat HPC/DNA repair assays, tetrachloroethylene was cytotoxic from 0.01% to 0.1% and was not genotoxic from 0.001% to 0.00001%.
[Naylor Dana Institute; DNA Repair Tests of 11 Chlorinated Hydrocarbon Analogs, Final Report. (1983), EPA Document No. 40-8324292, Fiche No. OTS0509403]**QC REVIEWED**

Metabolism/Pharmacokinetics:

Metabolism/Metabolites:

METABOLITES: TRICHLOROACETIC ACID; TRICHLOROETHANOL; INORG CHLORIDE; TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE IN EXPIRED AIR. /FROM TABLE/
[Sunshine, I. (ed.). CRC Handbook of Analytical Toxicology. Cleveland: The Chemical Rubber Co., 1969.381]**PEER REVIEWED**

IN TETRACHLOROETHYLENE EXPOSURE, URINARY METABOLITE LEVELS OF TRICHLOROETHANOL, TOTAL TRICHLORO COMPOUNDS, AND TRICHLOROACETIC ACID INCREASED UNTIL THE ATMOSPHERIC CONCN OF THE SOLVENT REACHED 50 TO 100 PPM; LITTLE INCR IN THESE METABOLITES OCCURRED AT HIGHER SOLVENT CONCN.
[IKEDA M ET AL; BRIT J IND MED 29 (3): 328-33 (1972)]**PEER REVIEWED**

The relationship among dose, metabolism and hepatotoxicity in mice which resulted from subchronic exposure to the chlorinated solvents trihloroethylene and perchloroethylene were examined. Male Swiss-Cox mice received either trichloroethylene (0 to 3200 mg/kg/day) or perchlorothylene (0 to 2000 mg/kg/day) in corn oil by gavage for 6 weeks. Urinary metabolites from individual mice were quantified to estimate the extent to which each compound was metabolized. Four parameters of hepatotoxicity were assessed: liver weight, triglycerides, glucose-6-phophatase activity, and serum glutamic-pyruvic transaminase (SGPT) activity. Trichloroethylene sigificantly affected liver weight and glucose-6-phosphatase activity; perchloroethylene affected all four parameters. The metabolism of trichloroethylene was linearly related to dose through 1600 mg/kg, but then became saturated. The metabolism of perchloroethylene was saturable. The dose-effect curves of the affected hepatotoxicity parameters of both compounds were nonlinear and resembled the dose-metabolism graph of the corresponding solvent. Plots of the hepatotoxicity data of each compound against total urinary metabolites were linear in all cases, suggesting that the hepatotoxicity of both perchloroethylene and trichloroethylene in mice is directly related to the extent of their metabolism. This pattern is consistent with formation of the toxic intermediate in the primary metabolic pathway of each compound.
[Buben JA, O'Flaherty EJ; Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 78 (1): 105-22 (1985)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Toxicokinetic modeling of the uptake & elimination of tetrachloroethylene showed that human metabolic parameters could be predicted by scaling rat metabolic parameters for tetrachloroethylene as a function of body weight. Trichloroacetic acid & trichloroethanol have been reported as urinary metabolites of tetrachloroethylene in both humans & experimental animals.
[IARC. Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Man. Geneva: World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1972-PRESENT. (Multivolume work).V63 190 (1995)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Absorption, Distribution & Excretion:

... READILY ABSORBED THROUGH THE LUNG AND TO A MUCH SMALLER DEGREE THROUGH SKIN OR MUCOUS MEMBRANES OR FOLLOWING INGESTION.
[Arena, J.M. and Drew, R.H. (eds.) Poisoning-Toxicology, Symptoms, Treatments. 5th ed. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas Publisher, 1986.257]**PEER REVIEWED**

METABOLISM ... IS RELATIVELY SLOW WITH ONLY FEW PERCENT OF DOSE BEING EXCRETED AS METABOLITES, MAJOR ONE BEING TRICHLOROACETIC ACID ...
[Doull, J., C.D. Klaassen, and M. D. Amdur (eds.). Casarett and Doull's Toxicology. 2nd ed. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., 1980.476]**PEER REVIEWED**

(36)CL-TETRACHLOROETHYLENE FED TO RATS IS EXCRETED LARGELY UNCHANGED IN EXPIRED AIR (98% OF DOSE IN 2 DAYS), AND IS METABOLIZED, TO ONLY SLIGHT EXTENT, INTO TRICHLOROACETIC ACID (2%) WHICH IS EXCRETED IN URINE.
[Parke, D. V. The Biochemistry of Foreign Compounds. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1968.213]**PEER REVIEWED**

Concn curves of perchloroethylene in blood and exhaled air after exposure showed that it was eliminated from the body at three different rates with corresponding half-life.
[Monster AC, Houtkooper JM; Int Arch Occup Env Health 42: 319 (1979)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Personal monitoring of exposure to tetrachloroethylene ... and analyses of urine for total trichloro-compounds were carried out in two groups of workers ... one group (20 males and 19 females) in dry-cleaning workshops and the other (16 males and 6 females) engaged in the removal of glue from silk cloth. Comparison of the urinary trichloro-compounds levels with tetrachloroethylene in the environment revealed that, while the metabolite levels increased essentially linear to tetrachloroethylene concn up to 100 ppm, leveling off was apparent in the metabolite excretion when the exposure to tetrachloroethylene was more intense (eg more than 100 ppm), indicating that the capacity of humans to metabolize tetrachloroethylene is rather limited. A tentative calculation ... indicated that, at the end of an 8 hr shift with exposure to tetrachloroethylene at 50 ppm (TWA), 38% of the tetrachloroethylene absorbed through the lung would be exhaled unchanged and less than 2% would be metabolized to be excreted into the urine, while the rest would remain in the body to be eliminated later.
[Ohtsuki T et al; Int Arch Occup Environ Health 51: 381-90 (1983)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Tetrachloroethylene was still detectable in the breath of rats 16 hr after a single exposure to levels of 339-3390 mg/cu m for 1-40 hr.
[WHO; Environ Health Criteria: Tetrachloroethylene p.21 (1984)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Male Sprague-Dawley rats exposed to (14)C-tetrachloroethylene by either gavage (1.0 mg/kg) or inhalation (10 ppm, 10.4 mg/kg) excreted 70% of the dose unchanged in expired air. Approximately 3% was excreted as carbon dioxide, and approximately 23% was excreted in the urine and feces as nonvolatile metabolites.
[NTP; Toxicology and Carcinogenesis Studies of Tetrachloroethylene p.19 Report #311 (1986) NIH Pub# 86-2567]**PEER REVIEWED**

Once in the bloodstream, tetrachloroethylene tends to distribute to body fat. In human tissue at autopsy, ratios of fat to liver concentrations are greater than 6:1
[McConnell G et al; Endeavor 34: 13-8 (1975) as cited in USEPA; Health Advisories for 25 Organics: Tetrachloroethylene p.307 (1987) PB 87-235578]**PEER REVIEWED**

An autopsy after a fatal tetrachloroethylene exposure revealed an 8 times greater concn in brain compared with blood ...
[Ellenhorn, M.J. and D.G. Barceloux. Medical Toxicology - Diagnosis and Treatment of Human Poisoning. New York, NY: Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Inc. 1988.986]**PEER REVIEWED**

Tetrachloroethylene (PCE) is eliminated primarily via the lung. The respiratory half-life for PCE elimination has been estimated at 65 to 70 hours.
[Stewart RD et al; Arch Environ Health 20: 224-9 (1970) as cited in USEPA; Health Advisories for 25 Organics: Tetrachloroethylene p.307 (1987) PB 87-235578]**PEER REVIEWED**

Tetrachloroethylene reached near steady-state levels in blood of human volunteers with two hours of continuous exposure.
[Stewart RD et al; Arch Environ Health 2: 516 (1961) as cited in USEPA; Ambient Water Quality Criteria Doc: Tetrachloroethylene p.C-3 (1980) EPA 440/5-80-073]**PEER REVIEWED**

Absorption of tetrachloroethylene (PCE) through the skin by immersing the thumbs of volunteers in PCE for 40 minutes and measuring the PCE in the exhaled air. High concentrations of PCE in exhaled breath (160 to 260 ug/cu m) were measurable five hours after exposure.
[Stewart RD and Dodd HC; Am Ind Hug Assoc Jour 25: 439 (1964) as cited in USEPA; Ambient Water Quality Criteria Doc: Tetrachloroethylene p.C-4 (1980) EPA 440/5-80-073]**PEER REVIEWED**

Tetrachloroethylene excretion in breast milk has been associated with obstructive jaundice in newborn infants.
[Ellenhorn, M.J. and D.G. Barceloux. Medical Toxicology - Diagnosis and Treatment of Human Poisoning. New York, NY: Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Inc. 1988.986]**PEER REVIEWED**

Nine unrelated groups (659 males) working in plastic boat, chemical, plastic button, paint, and shoe factories were studied. Urine samples were collected at the beginning of the workshift and at the end of the first half of the shift. A close relationship (correlation coefficient always above 0.85) between the average environmental solvent concentration (mg/cu m) measured in the breathing zone and the urinary concentration of unchanged solvent (ug/L) was observed. The authors recommended a biological equivalent exposure limit of 101 ug/L. biological exposure data for urine collected over 4 hr during random sampling for at least 1 yr could be used to evaluate long-term exposure and probability of non-compliance for individual or groups of workers.
[Ghittori S et al; Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 48 (9): 786-90 (1987)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Objective: The present study was initiated to examine a quantitative relationship between tetrachloroethene (TETRA) in blood & urine with TETRA in air, & to compare TETRA in blood or urine with trichloroacetic acid (TCA) in urine as exposure markers. Methods: In total, 44 workers (exposed to TETRA during automated, continuous cloth-degreasing operations), & ten non-exposed subjects volunteered to participate in the study. The exposure to vapor was monitored by diffusive sampling. The amounts of TETRA & TCA in end-of-shift blood & urine samples were measured by either head-space gas chromatography (HS-GC) or automated methylation followed by HS-GC. The correlation was examined by regression analysis. Results: The maximum time-weighted average (TWA) concn for TETRA-exposure was 46 ppm. Regression analysis for correlation of TETRA in blood, TETRA in urine & TCA in urine, with TETRA in air, showed that the coefficient was largest for the correlation between TETRA in air & TETRA in blood. The TETRA in blood, in urine & in air correlated mutually, whereas TCA in urine correlated more closely with TETRA in blood than with TETRA in urine. ... The biological marker levels at a hypothetical exposure of 25 ppm TETRA were substantially higher in the present study than were the levels reported in the literature. ... Conclusions: Blood TETRA is the best marker of occupational exposure to TETRA, being superior to the traditional marker, urinary TCA.
[FURUKI K et al; INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 73 (4): 221-227 (2000)]**PEER REVIEWED**

In vitro dermal absorption was measured for 3 volatile organic cmpds in dilute aqueous soln through freshly prepared & previously frozen human skin. The permeability coefficients at 26 deg C for chloroform (0.14 cm/h) & trichloroethylene (0.12 cm/h) were similar but much larger than that for tetrachloroethylene (0.018 cm/h). Storage of the skin at -20 deg C did not significantly affect the penetration of these chemicals. The dermal absorption of chloroform through freshly prepared human skin was not changed significantly by pretreatment of the skin with commonly used consumer products (moisturizer, baby oil, insect repellent, sunscreen); however, the permeability coefficient was found to incr from 0.071 cm/h at 11 deg C to 0.19 cm/h at 50 deg C. These data suggest that exposure estimates for chloroform & other contaminants in water should consider the appropriate exposure scenario to properly assess the dermal dose.
[Nakai JS et al; J Toxicol Environ Health 58 (3): 157-170 (1999)]**PEER REVIEWED**

During hyperventilation therapy, the relative contribution to the fast elimination process increased from 70% for physiological minute volume to 99.9%. A minor fraction of the ingested dose was excreted with the urine (integral of 1% during the first 3 days). In contrast to previous results, trace amounts of unchanged tetrachloroethylene were detected in the urine besides trichloroacetic acid and trichloroethanol.
[K'oppel C et al; J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 23 (2-3): 103-15 (1985)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Biological Half-Life:

The elimination of tetrachloroethylene in expired air ranged from 50 to 150 ppm (339 to 1,017 mg/cu m) for up to 8 hr. Biological half-life for fat stores was 71.5 hr.
[Gruberan E, Fernandez J; Brit J Ind Med 31: 159 (1974)]**PEER REVIEWED**

The biological half-life of tetrachloroethylene metabolites (as measured as total trichloro-compounds) is 144 hours.
[Ikeda M and Imamura T; Int Arch Arbeitsmed 31: 209 (1973) as cited in USEPA; Ambient Water Quality Criteria Doc: Tetrachloroethylene p.C-4 (1980) EPA 440/5-80-073]**PEER REVIEWED**

Elimination is slow (biological half-life of 65 hours for exhaled perchloroethylene) because of continuing release of perchloroethylene from fat stores.
[Ellenhorn, M.J. and D.G. Barceloux. Medical Toxicology - Diagnosis and Treatment of Human Poisoning. New York, NY: Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Inc. 1988.986]**PEER REVIEWED**

Mechanism of Action:

... /TETRACHLOROETHYLENE HAS BEEN/ SHOWN ... TO RELEASE LYSOSOMAL ENZYMES FROM GRANULAR FRACTIONS PREPARED FROM NEMATODES. SINCE GUT OF NEMATODES SEEMS TO BE SPECIALIZED FOR LYSOSOMAL INTRACELLULAR DIGESTION OF NUTRIENTS, INTERFERENCE WITH THIS PROCESS MAY WELL EXPLAIN ACTION OF TETRACHLOROETHYLENE ... IT HAS BEEN ASSUMED THAT AFFECTED WORMS ARE PARALYZED SUFFICIENTLY TO RELEASE THEIR ATTACHMENT TO INTESTINAL WALL ...
[Goodman, L.S., and A. Gilman. (eds.) The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. 5th ed. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc., 1975.1031]**PEER REVIEWED**

Interactions:

/When formerly used/ ... alcohol must be avoided before and for 24 hours after use of tetrachloroethylene. ... No laxative should be given, since this increases the toxic effects and decreases the effectiveness of the drug.
[American Medical Association, Department of Drugs. Drug Evaluations. 6th ed. Chicago, Ill: American Medical Association, 1986.1612]**PEER REVIEWED**

Intubation of rats with mixtures of benzene and tetrachloroethylene yielded a combined toxicity which was only slightly less than additive. Mixtures of toluene with tetrachloroethylene resulted in LD50 values of less than than predicted for simple additivity, indicating synergistic effects.
[USEPA; Ambient Water Quality Criteria Doc: Tetrachloroethylene p.C-17 (1980) EPA 440/5-80-073]**PEER REVIEWED**

Pharmacology:

Therapeutic Uses:

MEDICATION (VET): After the advent of phenothiazine ... little use has been made of the chlorinated hydrocarbons ... /as a ruminant anthelmintic/. Tetrachloroethylene has continued to be used in small animals over the years but has been largely replaced by drugs that are less toxic & easier to admin.
[Booth, N.H., L.E. McDonald (eds.). Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 5th ed. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press, 1982.839]**PEER REVIEWED**

... /IT/ IS USEFUL ONLY AGAINST HOOKWORM INFESTATIONS IN MAN. TREATMENT WITH THIS AGENT IS MORE EFFECTIVE AGAINST NECATOR AMERICANUS THAN AGAINST ANCYLOSTOMA DUODENALE ... /FORMER USE/
[Goodman, L.S., and A. Gilman. (eds.) The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. 5th ed. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc., 1975.1032]**PEER REVIEWED**

... SINGLE DOSE /ORAL/ OF 0.12 ML/KG ... MAX OF 5 ML. ... DIET BEFORE ADMIN ... SHOULD BE LOW IN FAT & PT SHOULD EAT ONLY LIGHT MEAL PREVIOUS EVENING. NEXT MORNING ... /DRUG/ INGESTED ON EMPTY STOMACH ... SINGLE TREATMENT ... GENERALLY REMOVE ... WORMS, BUT TWO OR MORE TREATMENTS @ 4-DAY INTERVALS ... TO CLEAR INFESTATION. /FORMER USE/
[Goodman, L.S., and A. Gilman. (eds.) The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. 5th ed. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc., 1975.1031]**PEER REVIEWED**

TETRACHLOROETHYLENE, USP ... AVAILABLE IN SOFT GELATIN CAPSULES CONTAINING 0.2, 1.0, OR 2.5 ML OF DRUG. IT MAY BE DIFFICULT TO OBTAIN DRUG IN CAPSULE FORM FOR HUMAN USE. /FORMER USE/
[Goodman, L.S., and A. Gilman. (eds.) The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. 5th ed. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc., 1975.1031]**PEER REVIEWED**

Drug Warnings:

VET: AT ONE TIME IT WAS USED FAIRLY EXTENSIVELY AGAINST GI PARASITES OF RUMINANTS. ITS DISADVANTAGE IN RUMINANTS IS NECESSITY OF STIMULATING CLOSURE OF ESOPHAGEAL GROOVE SO THAT MEDICATION IS DELIVERED DIRECTLY TO ABOMASUM RATHER THAN PASSING INTO RUMEN WHICH ... REDUCES EFFECTIVENESS OF DRUG. ... NO FOOD OR WATER SHOULD BE ALLOWED FOR 12-18 HR BEFORE & FOR 4 HR AFTER DOSING. ... /IT/ IS CONTRAINDICATED IN TAPEWORM-INFECTED ANIMALS SINCE IRRITATION OF THESE WORMS MAY RESULT IN THEIR BALLING UP & OCCLUDING DIGESTIVE PASSAGE. IT IS ... CONTRAINDICATED IN ANIMALS WITH DISTEMPER ... & SHOULD NOT BE ADMIN TO NURSING ANIMALS OR THOSE WEIGHING LESS THAN 2 LB (APPROX 1 KG).
[Booth, N.H., L.E. McDonald (eds.). Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 5th ed. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press, 1982.839]**PEER REVIEWED**

VET: RESTRICT DIETARY FAT WITHIN 2 DAYS BEFORE AND AFTER USE TO AVOID ENHANCED ABSORPTION OF THIS FAT SOL LIVER TOXICANT. CONTRAINDICATED IN FEBRILE DISEASES OR IN DEBILITATED ANIMALS. STRONG MUCOSAL IRRITANT. BREAKING CAPSULES IN MOUTH HAS PRODUCED ATAXIA, CONVULSIONS, AND ANESTHESIA.
[Rossoff, I.S. Handbook of Veterinary Drugs. New York: Springer Publishing Company, 1974.587]**PEER REVIEWED**

Food and Environmental Agents: Effect on Breast-Feeding: Tetrachloroethylene-cleaning fluid (perchloroethylene): Obstructive jaundice, dark urine. /from Table 7/
[Report of the American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs in Pediatrics 93 (1): 142 (1994)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Interactions:

/When formerly used/ ... alcohol must be avoided before and for 24 hours after use of tetrachloroethylene. ... No laxative should be given, since this increases the toxic effects and decreases the effectiveness of the drug.
[American Medical Association, Department of Drugs. Drug Evaluations. 6th ed. Chicago, Ill: American Medical Association, 1986.1612]**PEER REVIEWED**

Intubation of rats with mixtures of benzene and tetrachloroethylene yielded a combined toxicity which was only slightly less than additive. Mixtures of toluene with tetrachloroethylene resulted in LD50 values of less than than predicted for simple additivity, indicating synergistic effects.
[USEPA; Ambient Water Quality Criteria Doc: Tetrachloroethylene p.C-17 (1980) EPA 440/5-80-073]**PEER REVIEWED**

Environmental Fate & Exposure:

Environmental Fate/Exposure Summary:

Tetrachloroethylene's production and use as a dry cleaning agent, degreasing agent and as a chemical intermediate in the production of fluorocarbons will result in its release to the environment through various waste streams. If released to air, a vapor pressure of 18.5 mm Hg at 25 deg C indicates tetrachloroethylene will exist solely as a vapor in the ambient atmosphere. Vapor-phase tetrachloroethylene will be degraded in the atmosphere by reaction with photochemically-produced hydroxyl radicals; the half-life for this reaction in air is estimated to be 96 days. Direct photolysis is not expected to be an important environmental fate process since this compound only absorbs light weakly in the environmental UV spectrum. If released to soil, tetrachloroethylene is expected to have moderate mobility based upon Koc values in the range of 200-237 and tetrachloroethylene has often been detected in groundwater. Volatilization from moist soil surfaces is expected to be an important fate process based upon a Henry's Law constant of 0.0177 atm-cu m/mole. Tetrachloroethylene may volatilize from dry soil surfaces based upon its vapor pressure. Volatilization half-lives in the range of 1.2-5.4 hrs were measured for tetrachloroethylene from a sandy loam soil surface and volatilization half-lives of 1.9-5.2 hrs were measured from an organic topsoil. Biodegradation is expected to occur slowly in soils under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions. If released into water, tetrachloroethylene is not expected to adsorb to suspended solids and sediment in water based upon the Koc data. The biodegradation half-lives of tetrachloroethylene in aerobic and anaerobic waters were reported as 180 and 98 days, respectively. Volatilization from water surfaces is expected to be an important fate process based upon this compound's Henry's Law constant. Estimated volatilization half-lives for a model river and model lake are 1 hour and 5 days, respectively. Measured BCF values of 26-77 in fish suggest bioconcentration in aquatic organisms is low to moderate. Hydrolysis is not expected to be an important environmental fate process based on a hydrolysis half-life of 9 months. Tetrachloroethylene may undergo indirect photolysis in natural waters when photosensitizers such as humic material are present. Occupational exposure to tetrachloroethylene may occur through inhalation and dermal contact with this compound at workplaces where tetrachloroethylene is produced or used. The general population may be exposed to tetrachloroethylene via inhalation of ambient air, ingestion of food and drinking water. (SRC)
**PEER REVIEWED**

Probable Routes of Human Exposure:

Currently at risk of exposure are more than 500,000 workers, primarily in the dry cleaning & textile industries, which use more than 2/3 of the domestically produced tetrachloroethylene.
[Ellenhorn, M.J. and D.G. Barceloux. Medical Toxicology - Diagnosis and Treatment of Human Poisoning. New York, NY: Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Inc. 1988.986]**PEER REVIEWED**

NIOSH (NOES Survey 1981-1983) has statistically estimated that 536,688 workers (139,308 of these are female) are potentially exposed to tetrachloroethylene in the US(1). Occupational exposure to tetrachloroethylene may occur through inhalation and dermal contact with this compound at workplaces where tetrachloroethylene is produced or used(SRC). The mean concn of tetrachloroethylene in alveolar air in 18 workers at 12 dry cleaning stores was 73 mg/cu m(2). The general population may be exposed to tetrachloroethylene via inhalation of ambient air, ingestion of food and drinking water(SRC).
[(1) NIOSH; National Occupational Exposure Survey (NOES) (1983) (2) Verberk MM, Scheffers TML; Environ Res 21: 432-7 (1980)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Body Burden:

Tetrachloroethylene was detected in 7 of 8 samples in mother's milk from 4 urban areas in the US(1). One hour after a visit to a dry cleaning plant, one sample of mother's milk contained 10 ppm tetrachloroethylene. This decreased to 3 ppm after 24 hr(2). Tetrachloroethylene was detected in expired breath and blood from 9 individuals living in Love Canal, NY at 600-4,500 ng/cu m and 0.35-260 ng/ml, respectively(3). Tetrachloroethylene was detected in human body fat (8 subjects) 0.4-29.2 ppb and various human organs less than 6 ng/g(4). The mean concn of tetrachloroethylene in alveolar air in 136 residents living near 12 dry-cleaning stores were: living equal to or <5 floors above the stores 5 mg/cu m, adjacent houses 1 mg/cu m, one house away 0.2 mg/cu m, across street <.1 mg/cu m, whereas the mean concn in 18 workers from these stores was 73 mg/cu m(5).
[(1) Pellizzari ED et al; Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 28: 322-8 (1982) (2) Jensen AA; Res Rev 89: 1-128 (1983) (3) Barkley J et al; Biomed Mass Spectrom 7: 139-47 (1980) (4) McConnell G et al; Endeavour 34: 13-8 (1975) (5) Verberk MM, Scheffers TML; Environ Res 21: 432-7 (1980)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Whole blood, USA survey of 250 (121 males, 129 females), 0.7-23 ppb, 2.4 ppb avg(1). Breath samples (ug/cu m, weighted statistics), Elizabeth and Bayonne, NJ, 1981, 295-339 samples, 93% pos, 280 max, 13.0 avg, 6.8 median(2). Alveolar air in children and teachers in school situated near factory were 24 ug/cu m avg for children and 11 and 47 ug/cu m for the teachers(3). The mean concentration of tetrachloroethylene in the classroom was 13 ug/cu m(3). Alveolar air of residents of a nursing home situated near a former chemical waste dump averaged 7.8 ug/cu m first floor and 1.8 ug/cu m on the second floor, where ambient concentrations averaged 8.2 and 1.6 ug/cu m, respectively(3). USA FY82 National Human Adipose Tissue Survey specimens, 46 composites, 61% pos (>3 ppb, wet tissue concn), 94 ppb max(4).
[(1) Antoine SR et al; Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 36: 364-71 (1986) (2) Wallace L et al; J Occup Med 28: 603-7 (1986) (3) Monster AC, Smolders JFJ; Int Arch Environ Health 53: 331-6 (1984) (4) Stanley JS; Broad Scan Analysis of the FY82 National Human Adipose Tissue Survey Specimens Vol. I Executive Summary p. 5 USEPA-560/5-86-035 (1986)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Average Daily Intake:

The AVDI of tetrachloroethylene measured in 8 urban areas of Japan was reported as 21 ug (inhalation) and 0.84 ug (ingestion)(1).
[(1) Yoshida K; Chemosphere 27: 621-30 (1993)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Artificial Pollution Sources:

Water pollution by tetrachloroethylene leaching from vinyl liners in asbestos-cement water pipelines for water distribution.
[Yuskus LR; J Am Water Works Assoc 76 (2): 76-81 (1984)]**PEER REVIEWED**

During chlorination water treatment, it can be formed in small quantities.
[National Research Council. Drinking Water & Health Volume 1. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1977.769]**PEER REVIEWED**

Tetrachloroethylene's production and use as a dry cleaning agent, degreasing agent and as a chemical intermediate in the production of fluorocarbons(1) may result in its release to the environment through various waste streams(SRC). Tetrachloroethylene is released through vaporization losses from dry cleaning and industrial metal cleaning(2), and in wastewater, particularly from metal finishing, laundries, aluminum forming, organic chemical/plastics manufacturing and municipal treatment plants(3).
[(1) Lewis RJ Sr; Hawley's Condensed Chemical Dictionary. 13th ed. NY, NY: VanNostrand Reinhold Co., p. 850 (1997) (2) Chemical Marketing Reporter; Chemical Profile Tetrachloroethylene. December 15, 1997. NY, NY: Schnell Pub Co (1997) (3) US EPA; Treatability Manual. p. I.12.26-1 to I.12.26-5 USEPA-600/2-82-001A (1981)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Environmental Fate:

TERRESTRIAL FATE: Based on a classification scheme(1), Koc values in the range of 200-237(2-4), indicates that tetrachloroethylene is expected to have moderate mobility in soil(SRC). Volatilization of tetrachloroethylene from moist soil surfaces is expected to be an important fate process(SRC) given a Henry's Law constant of 0.0177 atm-cu m/mole(5). Tetrachloroethylene may volatilize from dry soil surfaces based on a vapor pressure of 18.5 mm Hg at 25 deg C(6). Volatilization half-lives in the range of 1.2-5.4 hrs were measured for tetrachloroethylene from a sandy loam soil surface and volatilization half-lives of 1.9-5.2 hrs were measured from an organic topsoil(7). Tetrachloroethylene, reached 11% of its theoretical BOD in 4 weeks using an activated sludge inoculum in the Japanese MITI test(8), suggesting biodegradation will be slow under aerobic conditions(SRC). Biodegradation under anaerobic conditions occurs slowly with acclimated microorganisms(9,10).
[(1) Swann RL et al; Res Rev 85: 17-28 (1983) (2) Choiu CT et al; Science 206: 831-2 (1979) (3) Wilson JT et al; Environ Qual 10: 501-506 (1981) (4) Friesel P et al; Fresenius Z Anal Chem 319: 160-64(1984) (5) Gossett JM; Environ Sci Technol 21: 202-206 (1987) (6) Riddick JA et al; Organic Solvents: Physical Properties and Methods of Purification 4th ed NY, NY: Wiley Interscience (1986) (7) Zytner RG et al; pp. 101-8 in 43rd Purdue Indust Waste Conf (1989) (8) Chemicals Inspection and Testing Institute. Japan Chemical Industry Ecology - Toxicology and Information Center.ISBN 4-89074-101-1 (1992) (9) Bouwer EJ, McCarty PL; Appl Environ Micribiol 45: 1286-94 (1983) (10) Wilson JT et al; Devel Indust Microbiol 24: 225-33 (1983)]**PEER REVIEWED**

AQUATIC FATE: Based on a classification scheme(1), Koc values in the range of 200-237(2-4) indicate that tetrachloroethylene is not expected to adsorb to suspended solids and sediment in water(SRC). Volatilization from water surfaces is expected(5) based upon a Henry's Law constant of 0.0177 atm-cu m/mole(6). Using this Henry's Law constant and an estimation method(5), volatilization half-lives for a model river and model lake are 1 hour and 5 days, respectively(SRC). According to a classification scheme(7), BCF values in the range of 26-77 measured in fish(8-10), suggests bioconcentration in aquatic organisms is low to moderate(SRC). The biodegradation half-lives of tetrachloroethylene in aerobic and anaerobic waters were reported as 180 and 98 days, respectively(11). Hydrolysis is not expected to be an important environmental fate process for tetrachloroethylene based on a hydrolysis half-life of 9 months in purified, de-ionized water(12). Tetrachloroethylene may undergo indirect photolysis in natural waters when photosensitizers such as humic acids are present(13). This process is only expected to be important in sunlit surface waters containing humic material.
[(1) Swann RL et al; Res Rev 85: 17-28 (1983) (2) Choiu CT et al; Science 206:831-2 (1979) (3) Wilson JT et al; Environ Qual 10: 501-506 (1981) (4) Friesel P et al; Fresenius Z Anal Chem 319: 160-64(1984) (5) Lyman WJ et al; Handbook of Chemical Property Estimation Methods. Washington, DC: Amer Chem Soc pp. 4-9, 15-1 to 15-29 (1990) (6) Gossett JM; Environ Sci Technol 21: 202-206 (1987) (7) Franke C et al; Chemosphere 29: 1501-14 (1994) (8) Neely WB et al; Environ Sci Technol 8: 1113-15 (1974) (9) Barrows ME et al; Dyn Exposure Hazzard Assess Toxic Chem Ann Arbor, MI: Ann Arbor Sci p. 379-92 (1980) (10) Chemicals Inspection and Testing Institute. Japan Chemical Industry Ecology - Toxicology and Information Center. ISBN 4-89074-101-1 (1992) (11) Capel PD, Larson SJ; Chemosphere 30: 1097-1106 (1995) (12) Dilling WL et al; Environ Sci Technol 9: 833-88 (1975) (13) Mill T; Chemosphere 38: 1379-90 (1999)]**PEER REVIEWED**

ATMOSPHERIC FATE: According to a model of gas/particle partitioning of semivolatile organic compounds in the atmosphere(1), tetrachloroethylene, which has a vapor pressure of 18.5 mm Hg at 25 deg C(2), is expected to exist solely as a vapor in the ambient atmosphere. Vapor-phase tetrachloroethylene is degraded in the atmosphere by reaction with photochemically-produced hydroxyl radicals(SRC); the half-life for this reaction in air is estimated to be 96 days(SRC), calculated from its rate constant of 1.67X10-13 cu cm/molecule-sec at 25 deg C(3). Tetrachloroethylene may also be degraded in the atmosphere by reaction with ozone, but the rate of this reaction is too slow to be environmentally important(4). Direct photolysis is not expected to be an important environmental fate process since this compound only absorbs light weakly in the environmental UV spectrum(5).
[(1) Bidleman TF; Environ Sci Technol 22: 361-367 (1988) (2) Riddick JA et al; Organic Solvents: Physical Properties and Methods of Purification 4th ed NY, NY: Wiley Interscience (1986) (3) Atkinson R; J Phys Chem Ref Data Monograph 1 (1989) (4) Atkinson R, Carter WPL; Chem Rev 84: 437-70 (1984) (5) Crutzen PJ et al; J Geophys Res 83: 345-63 (1978)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Environmental Biodegradation:

No degradation occurred in 21 days in 3 biodegradability tests with acclimated or unacclimated inocula or in a river die-away test(4). Microbial degradation did not contribute to the removal of tetrachloroethylene (PCE) in a mesocosm experiment which simulated Narraganset Bay, RI(5). Under aerobic conditions there was no degradation in 25 weeks in a batch experiment with a sewage inoculum(1) or when low concentrations of PCE (16 ug/l) were circulated through an acclimated aerobic biofilm column over a period of 1 year(2). While only 3.75% of the PCE treated by conventional, extended and 2-stage activated-sludge pilot plants appeared in the effluent, most of the PCE was discharged to the air from the extended aeration(3).
[(1) Bouwer EJ et al; Environ Sci Technol 15: 596-9 (1981) (2) Bouwer EJ, McCarty PL; Environ Sci Technol 16: 836-43 (1982) (3) Watanabe H; Gesuido Kyokaiski 20: 29-37 (1983) (4) Mudder TI; Amer Chem Soc Div Env Chem Conf p. 52-3 (1982) (5) Wakeham SG; Environ Sci Technol 17: 611-7 (1983)]**PEER REVIEWED**

ANAEROBIC: There is evidence that slow biodegradation of tetrachloroethylene (PCE) occurs under anaerobic conditions when the microorganisms have been acclimated, yielding trichloroethylene (TCE) as a product(1,2). An experiment in a continuous-flow laboratory methanogenic column using well acclimated mixed culture and a 2-day detention time had an average PCE removal rate of 76%(3). In a continuous-flow mixed-film methanogenic column with a liquid detention time of 4 days, mineralization of 24% of the PCE present occurred; TCE was the major intermediate formed (72%), but traces of dichloroethylene isomers and vinyl chloride were also found(4). In other column studies under a different set of methanogenic conditions, nearly quantitative conversion of PCE to VC was found in 10 days(4). Removal of 86% PCE occurred in a methanogenic biofilm column (8 weeks of activation followed by 9-12 weeks of acclimation(5)).
[(1) Bouwer EJ, McCarty PL; Appl Environ Micribiol 45: 1286-94 (1983) (2) Wilson JT et al; Devel Indust Microbiol 24: 225-33 (1983) (3) Bouwer EJ, McCarty PL; Ground Water 22: 433-40 (1984) (4) Vogel TM, McCarty PL; Appl Environ Microbiol 49: 1080-3 (1985) (5) Bouwer EJ, Wright JP; Am Chem Soc Div Environ Chem. 191st Natl Meet 26: 42-5 (1986)]**PEER REVIEWED**

A large reduction of tetrachloroethylene which had been recirculated through a soil column for 14 days was attributed to adsorption and volatilization(2). In a microcosm containing muck from an aquifer recharge basin, 72.8% loss was observed in 21 days against 12-17% in controls, and the metabolites trichloroethylene, cis- and trans-1,2-dichloroethylene, dichloromethane, and chloroethene were identified(3). However, when subsurface samples were aseptically removed from above and below the water table and incubated in the laboratory, no degradation occurred in 16 weeks(4). In one field groundwater recharge project, degradation was observed in the 50 day recharge period(1).
[(1) Bouwer EJ et al; Environ Sci Technol 15: 596-99 (1981) (2) Bouwer EJ et al; Water Res 15: 151-59 (1981) (3) Parsons F et al; J Amer Wat Works Assoc 76: 56-9 (1984) (4) Wilson JT et al; Ground Water 21: 134-42 (1983)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Tetrachloroethylene, present at 30 mg/l, reached 11% of its theoretical BOD in 4 weeks using an activated sludge inoculum at 100 mg/l and the Japanese MITI test(1), suggesting biodegradation will be slow under aerobic conditions(SRC). The biodegradation half-life of tetrachloroethylene in aerobic and anaerobic waters was reported as 180 and 98 days, respectively(2). The first-order anaerobic biodegradation rate constant of tetrachloroethylene was reported in the range of 0.00042-0.0071 day-1(3), corresponding to half-lives of 98-1,650 days(SRC). Tetrachloroethylene was degraded to trichloroethene, 1,2-dichloroethene and ultimately vinyl chloride during a 6 day incubation period using a groundwater and sediment microcosm obtained from a contaminated site in Toronto, Canada(4).
[(1) Chemicals Inspection and Testing Institute. Japan Chemical Industry Ecology - Toxicology and Information Center.ISBN 4-89074-101-1 (1992) (2) Capel PD, Larson SJ; Chemosphere 30: 1097-1106 (1995) (3) Rathbun RE; US Geol Surv Prof Pap 1589: 1-151 (1998) (4) Hunkeler D et al; Environ Sci Technol 33: 2733-38 (1999)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Environmental Abiotic Degradation:

The rate constant for the vapor-phase reaction of tetrachloroethylene with photochemically-produced hydroxyl radicals is 1.67X10-13 cu cm/molecule-sec at 25 deg C(1). This corresponds to an atmospheric half-life of about 96 days at an atmospheric concn of 5X10+5 hydroxyl radicals per cu cm(1). Tetrachloroethylene may also be degraded in the atmosphere by reaction with ozone, but the rate of this reaction is too slow to be environmentally important(2). Direct photolysis is not expected to be an important environmental fate process since this compound only absorbs light weakly in the environmental UV spectrum(3). Tetrachloroethylene may undergo indirect photolysis in natural waters when photosensitizers such as humic material are present(4). When tetrachloroethylene in aqueous solution was irradiated with light greater than 290 nm in wavelength, 75% degradation was observed over the course of one year, while 59-65% degradation was observed for dark controls(5). Hydrolysis is not expected to be an important environmental fate process for tetrachloroethylene based on a hydrolysis half-life of 9 months in purified, de-ionized water(5).
[(1) Atkinson R; J Phys Chem Ref Data Monograph 1 (1989) (2) Atkinson R, Carter WPL; Chem Rev 84: 437-70 (1984) (3) Crutzen PJ et al; J Geophys Res 83: 345-63 (1978) (4) Mill T; Chemosphere 38: 1379-90 (1999) (5) Dilling WL et al; Environ Sci Technol 9: 833-88 (1975)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Photodegradation in the stratosphere is rapid(1). When PCE adsorbed to silica gel is irradiated through a pyrex filter, 50-90% is lost in 6 days(2).
[(1) Mueller JPH Korte F; Chemosphere 3: 195-8 (1977) (2) Gaeb S et al; Nature 270: 331-3 (1977)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Environmental Bioconcentration:

The BCF value of tetrachloroethylene in fathead minnows was 39(1) and the BCF value for bluegill sunfish was 49(2). BCF values of 26-77 were observed for carp exposed to 0.1 mg/l of tetrachloroethylene and values of 28-76 were observed for carp exposed to 0.01 mg/l over an 8 week incubation period(3). According to a classification scheme(4), these BCF data suggest that bioconcentration in aquatic organisms is low to moderate(SRC).
[(1) Neely WB et al; Environ Sci Technol 8: 1113-15 (1974) (2) Barrows ME et al; Dyn Exposure Hazzard Assess Toxic Chem Ann Arbor, MI: Ann Arbor Sci pp. 379-92 (1980) (3) Chemicals Inspection and Testing Institute. Japan Chemical Industry Ecology - Toxicology and Information Center.ISBN 4-89074-101-1 (1992) (4) Franke C et al; Chemosphere 29: 1501-14 (1994)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Soil Adsorption/Mobility:

The Koc value of tetrachloroethylene in a silt loam was measured as 210(1) and the Koc in a Lincoln fine sandy soil was 200(2). An average Koc of 237 was calculated for tetrachloroethylene in 6 soils (acid peat, acid humic, calcareous humic, iron-oxide rich subsurface soil, clay subsurface soil, and sandy subsurface soil)(3). According to a classification scheme(4) these Koc data suggest that tetrachloroethylene is expected to have moderate mobility in soil(SRC).
[(1) Choiu CT et al; Science 206: 831-2 (1979) (2) Wilson JT et al; Environ Qual 10: 501-506 (1981) (3) Friesel P et al; Fresenius Z Anal Chem 319: 160-64 (1984) (4) Swann RL et al; Res Rev 85: 17-28 (1983)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Volatilization from Water/Soil:

The Henry's Law constant for tetrachloroethylene is 0.0177 atm-cu m/mole(1). This Henry's Law constant indicates that tetrachloroethylene expected to volatilize rapidly from water surfaces(2). Based on this Henry's Law constant, the volatilization half-life from a model river (1 m deep, flowing 1 m/sec, wind velocity of 3 m/sec)(2) is estimated as 1 hour(SRC). The volatilization half-life from a model lake (1 m deep, flowing 0.05 m/sec, wind velocity of 0.5 m/sec)(2) is estimated as 5 days(SRC). The volatilization half-life of tetrachloroethylene was reported as 3.2 minutes in laboratory experiments using distilled water(3). Tetrachloroethylene's Henry's Law constant(1) indicates that volatilization from moist soil surfaces may occur(SRC). Tetrachloroethylene is expected to volatilize from dry soil surfaces based on a vapor pressure of 18.5 mm Hg at 25 deg C(4). Volatilization half-lives in the range of 1.2-5.4 hrs were measured for tetrachloroethylene from a sandy loam soil surface and volatilization half-lives of 1.9-5.2 hrs were measured from an organic topsoil(5).
[(1) Gossett JM; Environ Sci Technol 21: 202-206 (1987) (2) Lyman WJ et al; Handbook of Chemical Property Estimation Methods. Washington, DC: Amer Chem Soc pp. 15-1 to 15-29 (1990) (3) Chiou CT et al; Environ Int 3: 231-4 (1980) (4) Riddick JA et al; Organic Solvents: Physical Properties and Methods of Purification 4th ed NY, NY: Wiley Interscience (1986) (5) Zytner RG et al; pp. 101-8 in 43rd Purdue Indust Waste Conf (1989)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Environmental Water Concentrations:

Samples for analysis of volatile organic compounds were collected from 315 wells in the Potomac-Raritan-Magothy aquifer system in southwestern New Jersey and a small adjacent area in Pennsylvania (USA) during 1980-1982. Volatile organic compounds were detected in all 3 aquifer units of the Potomac-Raritan-Magothy aquifer system. Most of the contamination appeared to be confined to the outcrop area. Low levels of contamination were found away from the outcrop area in the upper and middle aquifer. Trichloroethylene, tetrachloroethylene and benzene were the most frequently detected compounds. Differences in the distributions of light chlorinated hydrocarbons, /(including tetrachloroethylene)/, trichloroethylene, and aromatic hydrocarbons, ie, benzene, were noted and were probably due to differences in the uses of the compounds and the distribution patterns of potential contamination sources. The distribution patterns of volatile organic compounds differed greatly among the 3 aquifer units. The upper aquifer, which cropped out mostly in less-developed areas, had the lowest percentage of wells with volatile organic compounds detected (10% of wells sampled). The concentrations in most wells in the upper aquifer which had detectable levels were <10 ug/l. In the middle aquifer, which cropped out beneath much of the urban and industrial area adjacent to the Delaware River, detectable levels of volatile organic compounds were found in 22% of wells sampled, and several wells contained concentrations >100 ug/l. The lower aquifer, which was confined beneath much of the outcrop area of the aquifer system, had the highest percentage of wells (28%) with detectable levels. This was probably due to vertical leakage of contamination from the middle aquifer and the high percentage of wells tapping the lower aquifer in the most heavily developed areas of the outcrop.
[Fusillo TV et al; Ground Water 23 (3): 354-60 (1985)]**PEER REVIEWED**

The National Health Department (Italy) had promoted and supported a preliminary survey on the presence of some chlorinated organic compounds in the drinking water. The drinking water of some cities of northern Italy was analyzed for the presence of trichloroethylene, tetrachloroethylene, methylchloroform, carbon tetrachloride, trihalomethanes, polychlorinated biphenyls, and the most common chlorinated pesticides. From March, 1981 to June, 1982, 8 controls were done for 11 sampling points. All water underwent different treatments with carbon. In the raw water, trichloroethylene (47/48) and tetrachloroethylene (34/48) showed the highest frequency of positivity. One well had the highest concentrations of these compounds (trichloroethylene 81-158 ug/l; tetrachloroethylene 15-32 ug/l). In the finished waters, carbon trichloride the most abundant trihalomethane formed during chlorination, was detected in 80% of the 39 samples, against 31% in the 48 raw water samples. No polychlorinated biphenyls and chlorinated pesticides were found at the chosen detection limit (0.05 ug/l).
[Ziglio G et al; Ig Mod 82 (3): 419-35 (1984)]**PEER REVIEWED**

DRINKING WATER: In a survey of 180 US cities with finished surface water, the median concn of tetrachloroethylene in drinking water was reported as 0.3 ppb with a max concn of 21 ppb(1). In survey of 36 US cities with finished groundwater, the median concn of tetrachloroethylene was 3 ppb(1). Tetrachloroethylene was detected at a max conc of 1.5 ppm in contaminated drinking wells in the US(2,3). The avg concn of tetrachloroethylene from 30 Canadian potable water facilities was reported as 1 ppb(4). A survey of drinking water sources in the Netherlands showed that 64 sources had tetrachloroethylene concns greater than 10 ppb, 12 sources had concns greater than 100 ppb, 4 sources had concns greater than 1 ppm and 2 sources had concns greater than 100 ppm(5). Drinking water obtained from the Rhine River, Netherlands had a max concn of 50 parts per trillion tetrachloroethylene(6). Drinking water in Niagra Falls, NY had tetrachloroethylene concns of 0.35-2.9 ppb(7). A survey of drinking water for individual states in the US reported that 220 of 1,569 samples contained tetrachloroethylene at concns of trace to 3,000 ppb(8). Tetrachloroethylene was detected in 264 drinking water wells in California at a max concn of 166 ug/l(9).
[(1) Coniglio WA et al; Occurrence of Volatile Organics in Drinking Water. p. 7 Unpublished EPA report (1980) (2) Burmaster DE; Environ 24: 6-13, 33-6 (1982) (3) Giger W, Molnar-Kubica E; Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 19: 475-80 (1978) (4) Otson R et al; J Assoc Off Anal Chem 65: 1370-4 (1982) (5) Trouwborst T; Sci Total Environ 21: 41-6 (1981) (6) Piet GJ, Morra CF; pp. 31-42 in Artificial Groundwater recharge; Huismon L, Olsthorn TN, eds, Pitman Pub (1983) (7) Barkley J et al; Biomed Mass Spectrum 7: 139-47 (1980) (8) Cotruvo JA et al; pp. 511-30 in Organic Carcinogens in Drinking Water (1986) (9) Lam RHF et al; pp. 15-44 in Water Contamination and Health. Wang RGM, ed, NY, NY: Marcel Dekker, Inc (1994)]**PEER REVIEWED**

GROUNDWATER: The median concn of tetrachloroethylene in groundwater from 27 US cities was 0.6 ppb(1). The max concn of tetrachloroethylene in groundwater wells from San Fernando Valley, CA was 130 ppb(2). Groundwater from Britain contained less than 2 ppb of tetrachloroethylene in 8 out of 10 samples analyzed(3). Groundwater underlying 2 rapid infiltration sites in the US contained tetrachloroethylene at concns of 0.07 and 0.63 ppb(4). Shallow groundwater wells in Japan contained tetrachloroethylene at concns of 0.2-23,000 ppb and deep wells contained 0.2-150 ppb(5). Tetrachloroethylene was identified, not quantified in 27% of groundwater samples obtained from shallow wells in southern New Jersey(6).
[(1) Coniglio WA et al; Occurrence of Volatile Organics in Drinking Water. p. 7 Unpublished EPA report (1980) (2) Chemical Engineering 90: 35 (1983) (3) Fielding M et al; Environ Technol Lett 2: 545-50 (1981) (4) Hutchins SR et al; Environ Toxicol Chem 2: 195-216 (1983) (5) Magara Y, Furuichi T; pp. 231-43 in New Concepts and Development in Toxicol. Chambers PL et al, eds. Elsevier Sci Publ (1986) (6) Baehr L et al; Water Resour Res 35: 127-36 (1999)]**PEER REVIEWED**

SURFACE WATER: The median concn of tetrachloroethylene in surface water from 154 US cities was 2 ppb(1). Tetrachloroethylene was identified, not quantified, in 2,346 out of 4,972 samples of water from the Ohio River(2). The avg concn of tetrachloroethylene in Lake Ontario water was reported as 0.009 ppb(3). The concn of tetrachloroethylene in the Rhine River, Netherlands was reported as 0.12-0.62 ppb from 1976-1982(4). The concn of tetrachloroethylene in Lake Zurich, Switzerland was reported as 0.025-0.14 ppb(5,6). The STORET Database of US surface water reported that tetrachloroethylene was identified in 3,543 out of 9,323 surface water samples(7). Tetrachloroethylene was detected in the Elbe River near Hamburg Germany at concns of 16-163 ng/l from 1992-1993(8).
[(1) Coniglio WA et al; Occurrence of Volatile Organics in Drinking Water. p. 7 Unpublished EPA report (1980) (2) Ewing BB et al; Monitoring to Detect Previously Unrecognized Pollutants in Surface Water. USEPA-560/6-77-015 and USEPA-560/6-77-015A (1977) (3) Kaiser KLE et al; J Great Lakes Res 9: 212-23 (1983) (4) Malle KG; Z Wasser Abwasser Forsch 17: 75-81 (1984) (5) Grob K, Grob G; J Chrom 90: 303-13 (1974) (6) Schwarzenbach RP et al; Environ Sci Technol 13: 1367-73 (1979) (7) Staples CA et al; Environ Toxicol Chem 4: 131-42 (1985) (8) Gotz R et al; Chemosphere 36: 2085-2101 (1998)]**PEER REVIEWED**

SEAWATER: Tetrachloroethylene has been detected in seawater at concns of 0.1 to 0.8 parts per trillion(1,2). Tetrachloroethylene was detected in the Gulf of Mexico at concns of 0-40 parts per trillion(3). Surface water from the Eastern Pacific Ocean contained tetrachloroethylene at concns of 0.1-2.8 parts per trillion(4).
[(1) Murray AJ, Riley JP; Nature 242: 37-8 (1973) (2) Pearson CR, McConnell G; Proc Roy Soc London Ser B 189: 305-32 (1975) (3)Sauer TC Jr; Org Geochem 3: 91-101 (1981) (4) Singh HB et al; J Geophys Res 88: 3675-83 (1983)]**PEER REVIEWED**

RAIN/SNOW: Tetrachloroetheylene was detected in rain from an industrial city in England at 150 parts per trillion(1). West Los Angeles (3/26/82) tetrachloroethylene was detected in rain at a concn of 21 parts per trillion(2). Tetrachloroethylene was detected in rain from La Jolla, California at 5.7 parts per trillion(3) and central and southern California at 1.4 and 2.3 parts per trillion, respectively(3).
[(1) Pearson CR, McConnell G; Proc Roy Soc London Ser B 189: 305-32 (1975) (2) Kawamura K, Kaplan IR; Environ Sci Technol 17: 497-501 (1983) (3) Su C, Goldberg ED; Mar Poll Transfer 1976: 353-74 (1976)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Effluent Concentrations:

Tetrachloroethylene was detected in industrial effluent at concns of 1-20 ppb and in the effluent of municipal treatment plants at concns of 1-10 ppb(1). Tetrachloroethylene was released from the Baltimore Municipal Treatment Plant at concns of 8-129 ppb(2). Maximum concns of tetrachloroethylene were reported in wastewater from the following industries: auto and laundry facilities, 93 ppm; aluminum forming facilities, 4 ppm; metal finishing plants; 110 ppm; organic chemical/plastic manufacturing plants, 5.1 ppm (mean value); paint and ink plants, 4.9 ppm(3). Tetrachloroethylene was detected in landfill gas from 7 waste sites in the United Kingdom at concns of 0.1-255 ng/cu m(4). Tetrachloroethylene was detected in the effluent of a municipal waste incinerator in Germany at 0.16 ug/cu m(5). Tetrachloroethylene was identified, not quantified, in water samples at 279 hazardous waste sites in the US(6).
[(1) STORET Data Base (2) Helz GR, Hsu RY; Limnol Oceanogr 23: 858-69 (1978) (3) US EPA; Treatability Manual. p.I.12.26-1 to I.12.26-5 USEPA-600/2-82-001A (1981) (4) Allen MR Environ Sci Technol 31: 1054-61 (1997) (5) Jay K, Stieglitz L; Chemosphere 30: 1249-60 (1995) (6) Johnson BL; Chemosphere 31: 2415-28 (1995)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Sediment/Soil Concentrations:

SOIL: Tetrachloroethylene was detected in soil samples from rural areas of the Netherlands at concns of 0.2-1.0 ug/kg(1). Tetrachloroethylene was identified, not quantified, in soil samples from a photocopier refurbishing plant in NY(2). Tetrachloroethylene was detected in soil from an industrial waste disposal site in Denmark at a concn of 19 mg/kg(3).
[(1) Hoekstra EJ et al; Chemosphere 38: 2875-83 (1999) (2) Pavlostathis SG, Zhuang P; Chemosphere 27: 586-96 (1993) (3) Broholm K et al; Environ Technol 12: 279-89 (1991)]**PEER REVIEWED**

SEDIMENT: Tetrachloroethylene was detected in sediment from 172 stations in Liverpool Bay, England at an avg concn of 4.8 parts per trillion(1). Tetrachloroethylene was detected in 25 of 359 sediment samples from the US at a median concn of less than 0.050 ppb(2). Tetrachloroethylene was detected in sediment from Ijmeer, Netherlands at concns of 0.02 and 0.07 mg/kg(3).
[(1) Pearson CR, McConnell G; Proc Roy Soc London Ser B 189: 305-32 (1975) (2) Staples CA et al; Environ Toxicol Chem 4: 131-42 (1985) (3) Heida H; Contam Soil Int Conf 909-912 (1986)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Atmospheric Concentrations:

URBAN/SUBURBAN: The concentration of tetrachloroethylene at various US cities ranged from less than 0.2 to 9.75 ppb(1). Tetrachloroethylene mean concentrations from seven U.S. cities (1980-1981) ranged from 0.290-0.590 ppb with a max concn of 7.60 ppb(2).
[(1) Lillian D et al; Amer Chem Soc Symp Ser 17: 152-8 (1975) (2) Andelman JB; Environ Health Persp 62: 313-8 (1985)]**PEER REVIEWED**

INDOOR: The median concn of tetrachloroethylene inside 9 homes near Old Love Canal, Niagara, NY was reported as 71 parts per trillion(1). Tetrachloroethylene was detected in a classroom near a dry cleaning facility in the Netherlands at 1.9 ppb,(2) and a nursing home situated near a former chemical waste dump at 1.2 and 0.2 ppb on first and second floors, respectively(3).
[(1) Barkley J et al; Biomed Mass Spectron 7: 139-47 (1980) (2) Monster AC, Smolders JFJ; Int Arch Occup Environ Health 53: 331-6 (1984) (3) Herbert P et al; Chem Ind 24: 861-9 (1986)]**PEER REVIEWED**

RURAL/REMOTE: Tetrachloroethylene was detected in White Face Mountains, NY at concns of less than 0.02 to 0.19 ppb from September 16-19 1974(1). Tetrachloroethylene was detected in Barrows, Alaska at concns of 56-128 parts per trillion(2). The average concn of tetrachloroethylene in the northern hemisphere was reported as 40 parts per trillion(3).
[(1) Lillian D et al; Amer Chem Soc Symp Ser 17: 152-8 (1975) (2) Khalil MAK, Rasmussen RA; Environ Sci Technol 17: 157-64 (1983) (3) Singh HB et al; Atmospheric Distrbutions, Sources and Sinks of Selected Halocarbons, Hydrocarbons, SF6 and N20. USEPA-600/3-79-107 p. 88,117-8 (1979)]**PEER REVIEWED**

SOURCE DOMINATED: Typical concns of tetrachloroethylene in source dominated and industrial areas have been reported in the range of 0.3-1.5 ppb, with max concns of 10 ppb(1-5). Tetrachloroethylene was detected in Old Love Canal, Niagara, NY at a median concn of 109 parts per trillion(6). Tetrachloroethylene was detected around a playground near a dry cleaning facility in the Netherlands at 0.15 ppb(7). Tetrachloroethylene was detected in industrialized regions of Tsubame, Japan (0.019-0.23 ppb), Tokamachi, Japan (0.20-2.8 ppb) and Kubiki, Japan (0.024-0.63 ppb)(8).
[(1) Lillian D et al; Amer Chem Soc Symp Ser 17: 152-8 (1975) (2) Pellizzari ED; Quantation of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons in Previously Collected Air Samples. USEPA-450/3-78-112 (1978) (3) Singh HB et al; Environ Sci Technol 16: 872-80 (1982) (4) Su C, Goldberg ED; Mar Pollut Transfer pp. 353-74 (1976) (5) Leoy PJ et al; Atmos Environ 17: 2321-30 (1983) (6) Barkley J et al; Biomed Mass Spectron 7: 139-47 (1980) (7) Monster AC, Smolders JFJ; Int Arch Occup Environ Health 53: 331-6 (1984) (8) Kawata K et al; Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 57: 1-7 (1996)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Food Survey Values:

Tetrachloroethylene concentrations in foods ranged from non-detectable amounts (<0.01 ug/kg) in orange juice to 13 ug/kg in English butter.
[McConnell G et al; Endeavour 34: 13 as cited in USEPA; Ambient Water Quality Criteria Doc: Tetrachloroethylene p.C-1 (1980) EPA 440/5-80-073]**PEER REVIEWED**

Tetrachloroethylene was detected in Chinese style sauce (2 ppb), quince jelly (2.2 ppb), crab apple jelly (2.5 ppb), grape jelly (1.6 ppb) and chocolate sauce (3.6 ppb)(1). Tetrachloroethylene was detected in various food from England at concns of 0.01-0.13 ppb(2). Tetrachloroethylene was detected in 2 of 10 wheat samples at 1.8 and 2.1 ppb and 2 corn samples at 0.45 and 0.54 ppb(3). Tetrachloroethylene was detected in butter and margarine at concns of 0.7-18 ug/kg and peanut butter at concns of 0.6-9.7 ug/kg(4).
[(1) Entz RC, Hollifield HC; J Agric Food Chem 30: 84-88 (1982) (2) McConnell G et al; Endeavour 34: 13-18 (1975) (3) Heikes DL, Hopper ML; J Assoc Anal Chem 69: 990-98 (1986) (4) Page BD, Lacroix GM; J AOAC Int 78: 1416-28 (1995)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Plant Concentrations:

Tetrachloroethylene was detected in marine algae at concns of 13-23 ppb(1).
[(1) Pearson CR, McConnell G; Proc Roy Soc London Ser B 189: 305-22 (1975)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Fish/Seafood Concentrations:

Tetrachloroethylene was detected at concns of 0.3-43 ppb in marine fish, 0.5-176 ppb in marine invertebrates in England(1), 250 ppb in American eel (Delaware River), 1,050 ppb in American eel (Newark Bay), 77 ppb in carp (Delaware River), 108 ppb in striped bass (Raritan River), 88 ppb in spot fish (Houston Ship Channel)(2). Tetrachloroethylene was detected in fish from the Rhine River and Lake Constance Germany at concns of 25-100 ppb(3). Tetrachloroethylene was detected in clams from the Ariho River, Japan at 0.6 ug/kg(4).
[(1) Pearson CR, McConnell G; Proc Roy Soc London Ser B 189: 305-32 (1975) (2) Dickson AG, Riley JP; Mar Pollut Bull 7: 167-9 (1976) (3) Binnemann PH et al; A Lebensm - Unters Forsch 176: 253-61 (1983) (4) Gotoh M et al; Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 60: 74-80 (1998)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Animal Concentrations:

Tetrachloroethylene was detected at concns of 0.6-19 ppb in grey seal blubber (NE Coast of England) and at concns of 1.4-39 ppb in marine and freshwater birds (coast of England)(1).
[(1) Pearson CR, McConnell G; Proc Roy Soc London Ser B 189: 305-32 (1975)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Milk Concentrations:

Tetrachloroethylene was detected in 7 of 8 samples in mother's milk from 4 urban areas in the US(1). One hour after a visit to a dry cleaning plant, one sample of mother's milk contained 10 ppm tetrachloroethylene. This decreased to 3 ppm after 24 hr(2).
[(1) Pellizzari ED et al; Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 28: 322-8 (1982) (2) Jensen AA; Res Rev 89: 1-128 (1983)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Environmental Standards & Regulations:

Acceptable Daily Intakes:

Suggested No-Adverse-Response Level (SNARL): In light of the lack of definitive information regarding the quantitiy of tetrachloroethylene that must be ingested to depress psychophysiological function, it seems appropriate that calculations for a SNARL be based upon quantities of the chemical that are required to produce tissue injury. ... the 0.3 ml/kg (0.49 g/kg) dose appears to be a reasonable "minimum toxic dose" from which to calculate a 24-hr SNARL for contamination of drinking water, assuming that the sole source of tetrachloroethylene during this period will be from 2 l/day of drinking water consumed by a 70 kg human. A safety factor of 100 is applied: 490 mg/kg times 70 kg/100 times 2 l= 172 mg/l. The above considerations ignore the possibility that tetrachloroethylene may be carcinogenic. ... a 7-day standard for drinking water contamination, which was obtained by dividing the 24-hr standard by 7 (172 mg/l/7 days= 24.5 mg/l), should protect against adverse effects by the chemical.
[National Research Council. Drinking Water and Health. Volume 3. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1980.140]**PEER REVIEWED**

TSCA Requirements:

Pursuant to section 8(d) of TSCA, EPA promulgated a model Health and Safety Data Reporting Rule. The section 8(d) model rule requires manufacturers, importers, and processors of listed chemical substances and mixtures to submit to EPA copies and lists of unpublished health and safety studies. Tetrachloroethylene is included on this list.
[40 CFR 716.120 (7/1/2000)]**PEER REVIEWED**

RCRA Requirements:

D039; A solid waste containing tetrachloroethylene may or may not become characterized as a hazardous waste when subjected to the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure listed in 40 CFR 261.24, and if so characterized, must be managed as a hazardous waste.
[40 CFR 261.24 (7/1/2000)]**PEER REVIEWED**

F002; When tetrachloroethylene is a spent halogenated solvent, it is classified as a hazardous waste from a nonspecific source (F002), as stated in 40 CFR 261.31, and must be managed according to state and/or federal hazardous waste regulations.
[40 CFR 261.31 (7/1/2000)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Atmospheric Standards:

Listed as a hazardous air pollutant (HAP) generally known or suspected to cause serious health problems. The Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990, directs EPA to set standards requiring major sources to sharply reduce routine emissions of toxic pollutants. EPA is required to establish and phase in specific performance based standards for all air emission sources that emit one or more of the listed pollutants. Tetrachloroethylene is included on this list.
[Clean Air Act as amended in 1990, Sect. 112 (b) (1) Public Law 101-549 Nov. 15, 1990]**PEER REVIEWED**

Clean Water Act Requirements:

Toxic pollutant designated pursuant to section 307(a)(1) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act and is subject to effluent limitations.
[40 CFR 401.15 (7/1/2000)]**QC REVIEWED**

Federal Drinking Water Standards:

EPA 5 ug/l
[USEPA/Office of Water; Federal-State Toxicology and Risk Analysis Committee (FSTRAC). Summary of State and Federal Drinking Water Standards and Guidelines (11/93)]**QC REVIEWED**

State Drinking Water Standards:

(FL) FLORIDA 3 ug/l
[USEPA/Office of Water; Federal-State Toxicology and Risk Analysis Committee (FSTRAC). Summary of State and Federal Drinking Water Standards and Guidelines (11/93)]**QC REVIEWED**

(NJ) NEW JERSEY 1 ug/l
[USEPA/Office of Water; Federal-State Toxicology and Risk Analysis Committee (FSTRAC). Summary of State and Federal Drinking Water Standards and Guidelines (11/93)]**QC REVIEWED**

State Drinking Water Guidelines:

(AZ) ARIZONA 0.67 ug/l
[USEPA/Office of Water; Federal-State Toxicology and Risk Analysis Committee (FSTRAC). Summary of State and Federal Drinking Water Standards and Guidelines (11/93)]**QC REVIEWED**

(CT) CONNECTICUT 5 ug/l
[USEPA/Office of Water; Federal-State Toxicology and Risk Analysis Committee (FSTRAC). Summary of State and Federal Drinking Water Standards and Guidelines (11/93)]**QC REVIEWED**

(ME) MAINE 3 ug/l
[USEPA/Office of Water; Federal-State Toxicology and Risk Analysis Committee (FSTRAC). Summary of State and Federal Drinking Water Standards and Guidelines (11/93)]**QC REVIEWED**

(MN) MINNESOTA 7 ug/l
[USEPA/Office of Water; Federal-State Toxicology and Risk Analysis Committee (FSTRAC). Summary of State and Federal Drinking Water Standards and Guidelines (11/93)]**QC REVIEWED**

(WA) WASHINGTON 4 ug/l
[USEPA/Office of Water; Federal-State Toxicology and Risk Analysis Committee (FSTRAC). Summary of State and Federal Drinking Water Standards and Guidelines (11/93)]**QC REVIEWED**

Chemical/Physical Properties:

Molecular Formula:

C2-Cl4
**PEER REVIEWED**

Molecular Weight:

165.83
[Lide, D.R. (ed.). CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 79th ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press Inc., 1998-1999. 3-164]**PEER REVIEWED**

Color/Form:

Colorless liquid.
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997.300]**PEER REVIEWED**

Odor:

Ether-like odor
[Lewis, R.J., Sr (Ed.). Hawley's Condensed Chemical Dictionary. 13th ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1997. 850]**PEER REVIEWED**

Mildly sweet, chloroform-like odor
[U.S. Coast Guard, Department of Transportation. CHRIS - Hazardous Chemical Data. Volume II. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1984-5.]**PEER REVIEWED**

Chlorinated solvent odor
[Ruth JH; Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 47: A-142-51 (1986)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Boiling Point:

121.3 deg C
[Lide, D.R. (ed.). CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 79th ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press Inc., 1998-1999. 3-164]**PEER REVIEWED**

Melting Point:

-22.3 deg C
[Lide, D.R. (ed.). CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 79th ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press Inc., 1998-1999. 3-164]**PEER REVIEWED**

Corrosivity:

Corrosion of aluminum, iron, and zinc, which is negligible unless water is present, can be inhibited by the addition of stabilizers
[Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology. 4th ed. Volumes 1: New York, NY. John Wiley and Sons, 1991-Present.V6 (93) 52]**PEER REVIEWED**

Critical Temperature & Pressure:

347.1 deg C; 9.74 MPa (to convert MPa to atm, divide by 0.101)
[Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology. 4th ed. Volumes 1: New York, NY. John Wiley and Sons, 1991-Present.V6 (93) 52]**PEER REVIEWED**

Density/Specific Gravity:

1.6227 @ 20 deg C/4 deg C
[Lide, D.R. (ed.). CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 79th ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press Inc., 1998-1999. 3-164]**PEER REVIEWED**

Heat of Combustion:

679.9 kJ/mol (constant pressure with formation of aq hydrochloric acid; 831.8 kJ/mol (constant volume at 18.7 deg C) (to convert J to cal, divide by 4.184)
[Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology. 4th ed. Volumes 1: New York, NY. John Wiley and Sons, 1991-Present.V6 (93) 51]**PEER REVIEWED**

Heat of Vaporization:

90.2 BTU/lb= 50.1 cal/g= 2.10X10+5 J/kg
[U.S. Coast Guard, Department of Transportation. CHRIS - Hazardous Chemical Data. Volume II. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1984-5.]**PEER REVIEWED**

Octanol/Water Partition Coefficient:

log Kow= 3.40
[Hansch, C., Leo, A., D. Hoekman. Exploring QSAR - Hydrophobic, Electronic, and Steric Constants. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society., 1995.3]**PEER REVIEWED**

Solubilities:

Miscible with alcohol, ether, chloroform, benzene
[Budavari, S. (ed.). The Merck Index - An Encyclopedia of Chemicals, Drugs, and Biologicals. Whitehouse Station, NJ: Merck and Co., Inc., 1996.1571]**PEER REVIEWED**

Miscible with solvent hexane; dissolves in most of the fixed and volatile oils
[Osol, A. (ed.). Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences. 16th ed. Easton, Pennsylvania: Mack Publishing Co., 1980.1184]**PEER REVIEWED**

0.015 G/100 ML WATER AT 25 DEG C
[IARC. Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Man. Geneva: World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1972-PRESENT. (Multivolume work).V20 492 (1979)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Spectral Properties:

SADTLER REF NUMBER: 237 (IR, PRISM); 79 (IR, GRATING)
[Weast, R.C. (ed.). Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 60th ed. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press Inc., 1979.C-298]**PEER REVIEWED**

Index of Refraction: 1.5053 at 20 deg C/D
[Lide, D.R. (ed.). CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 79th ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press Inc., 1998-1999. 3-164]**PEER REVIEWED**

IR: 4786 (Coblentz Society Spectral Collection)
[Weast, R.C. and M.J. Astle. CRC Handbook of Data on Organic Compounds. Volumes I and II. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press Inc. 1985.V1 627]**PEER REVIEWED**

MASS: 1053 (Atlas of Mass Spectral Data, John Wiley & Sons, New York)
[Weast, R.C. and M.J. Astle. CRC Handbook of Data on Organic Compounds. Volumes I and II. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press Inc. 1985.V1 627]**PEER REVIEWED**

Surface Tension:

31.74 dynes/cm at 20 deg C in contact with vapor
[Weast, R.C. (ed.) Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 68th ed. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press Inc., 1987-1988.F-37]**PEER REVIEWED**

Vapor Density:

5.7 (AIR= 1)
[Browning, E. Toxicity and Metabolism of Industrial Solvents. New York: American Elsevier, 1965.213]**PEER REVIEWED**

Vapor Pressure:

18.5 mm Hg @ 25 deg C
[Riddick, J.A., W.B. Bunger, Sakano T.K. Techniques of Chemistry 4th ed., Volume II. Organic Solvents. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons., 1985.]**PEER REVIEWED**

Relative Evaporation Rate:

EVAPORATION RATE SLOWER THAN THAT FOR TRICHLOROETHYLENE, ABOUT 3-1.
[Browning, E. Toxicity and Metabolism of Industrial Solvents. New York: American Elsevier, 1965.213]**PEER REVIEWED**

Viscosity:

Liquid: 0.932, 0.839, 0.657 & 0.534 CP at 15, 25, 50 & 75 deg C, respectively; Vapor: 9900 CP at 60 deg C
[Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology. 4th ed. Volumes 1: New York, NY. John Wiley and Sons, 1991-Present.V6 (93) 51]**PEER REVIEWED**

Other Chemical/Physical Properties:

Liquid-water interfacial tension: 44.4 dynes/cm= 0.0444 N/m at 25 deg C
[U.S. Coast Guard, Department of Transportation. CHRIS - Hazardous Chemical Data. Volume II. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1984-5.]**PEER REVIEWED**

Conversion factors: 1 mg/l equals 147.4 ppm and 1 ppm equals 6.78 mg/cu m at 25 deg C, 760 mm Hg
[Clayton, G.D., F.E. Clayton (eds.) Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology. Volumes 2A, 2B, 2C, 2D, 2E, 2F: Toxicology. 4th ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1993-1994.4208]**PEER REVIEWED**

Partition coefficients at 37 deg C for tetrachloroethylene into blood= 13.1; into oil= 1,920
[Sato A, Nakajima T; Scand J Work Environ Health 13: 81-93 (1987)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Sat concn in air: 126 g/cu m at 20 deg C, 210 g/cu m at 30 deg C
[Verschueren, K. Handbook of Environmental Data on Organic Chemicals. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1996.1674]**PEER REVIEWED**

DECOMP SLOWLY IN WATER TO YIELD TRICHLOROACETIC AND HYDROCHLORIC ACIDS; OXIDIZED BY STRONG OXIDIZING AGENTS
[IARC. Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Man. Geneva: World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1972-PRESENT. (Multivolume work).V20 492 (1979)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Henry's law constant = 0.0177 atm-cu m/mole @ 25 deg C
[Gossett JM; Environ Sci Technol 21: 202-6 (1987)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Hydroxyl radical rate constant = 1.67X10-13 cu cm/molecule-sec @ 25 deg C
[Atkinson R; J Phys Chem Ref Data Monograph No. 2 (1994)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Chemical Safety & Handling:

Hazards Summary:

The major hazards encountered in the use and handling of tetrachloroethylene stem from its toxicologic properties. Exposure to this colorless liquid may occur from its use as a solvent and as an intermediate in chemical syntheses. In addition to eye and skin inflammation from contacting liquid tetrachloroethylene, inhalation of its vapor can cause central nervous system depression, liver necrosis, and effects on the lung, heart, and kidney. The ACGIH recommends a workplace limit (TLV) of 50 ppm as an 8 hr time-weighted average (TWA) with a note to prevent skin contact. Tetrachloroethylene's sweet chloroform-like odor may warn of its presence at a sub-TLV level of 4.68 ppm; however, to assure against exposure, it is recommended that self-contained breathing apparatus and full protective clothing be worn, especially in fire or spill situations. Although considered nonflammable, containers of tetrachloroethylene may explode in the heat of a fire and its vapor will decompose in contact with open flames or red-heated materials to yield the poisonous gas, phosgene. For small fires involving tetrachloroethylene, extinguish with dry chemical or CO2, and for large fires, use water spray, fog, or foam. Cool containers with water. If the fire involves a tank car or truck, isolate the area for 1/2 mile in all directions. Tetrachloroethylene should be stored in a cool, dry, well-ventilated location, away from strong oxidizers, potential fire hazards, caustic soda, potash, and chemically active metals such as barium, lithium, and beryllium. For small spills of tetrachloroethylene, ventilate the area then take up with vermiculite, dry sand, or earth. Large spills should be diked for later disposal. Prior to implementing land disposal of waste residues (including waste sludge), consult environmental regulatory agencies for guidance.
**PEER REVIEWED**

DOT Emergency Guidelines:

Health: Vapors may cause dizziness or suffocation. Exposure in an enclosed area may be very harmful. Contact may irritate or burn skin and eyes. Fire may produce irritating and/or toxic gases. Runoff from fire control or dilution water may cause pollution.
[U.S. Department of Transportation. 2000 Emergency Response Guidebook. RSPA P 5800.8 Edition. Washington, D.C: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2000,p. G-160]**QC REVIEWED**

Fire or explosion: Some of these materials may burn, but none ignite readily. Most vapors are heavier than air. Air/vapor mixtures may explode when ignited. Container may explode in heat of fire.
[U.S. Department of Transportation. 2000 Emergency Response Guidebook. RSPA P 5800.8 Edition. Washington, D.C: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2000,p. G-160]**QC REVIEWED**

Public safety: CALL Emergency Response Telephone Number ... . Isolate spill or leak area immediately for at least 25 to 50 meters (80 to 160 feet) in all directions. Keep unauthorized personnel away. Stay upwind. Many gases are heavier than air and will spread along ground and collect in low or confined areas (sewers, basements, tanks). Keep out of low areas. Ventilate closed spaces before entering.
[U.S. Department of Transportation. 2000 Emergency Response Guidebook. RSPA P 5800.8 Edition. Washington, D.C: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2000,p. G-160]**QC REVIEWED**

Protective clothing: Wear positive pressure self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA). Structural firefighters' protective clothing will only provide limited protection.
[U.S. Department of Transportation. 2000 Emergency Response Guidebook. RSPA P 5800.8 Edition. Washington, D.C: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2000,p. G-160]**QC REVIEWED**

Evacuation: ... Fire: If tank, rail car or tank truck is involved in a fire, ISOLATE for 800 meters (1/2 mile) in all directions; also, consider initial evacuation for 800 meters (1/2 mile) in all directions.
[U.S. Department of Transportation. 2000 Emergency Response Guidebook. RSPA P 5800.8 Edition. Washington, D.C: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2000,p. G-160]**QC REVIEWED**

Fire: Small fires: Dry chemical, CO2 or water spray. Large fires: Dry chemical, CO2, alcohol-resistant foam or water spray. Move containers from fire area if you can do it without risk. Dike fire control water for later disposal; do not scatter the material. Fire involving tanks or car/trailer loads: Fight fire from maximum distance or use unmanned hose holders or monitor nozzles. Cool containers with flooding quantities of water until well after fire is out. Withdraw immediately in case of rising sound from venting safety devices or discoloration of tank. ALWAYS stay away from tanks engulfed in fire.
[U.S. Department of Transportation. 2000 Emergency Response Guidebook. RSPA P 5800.8 Edition. Washington, D.C: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2000,p. G-160]**QC REVIEWED**

Spill or leak: Eliminate all ignition sources (no smoking, flares, sparks or flames in immediate area). Stop leak if you can do it without risk. Small liquid spills: Take up with sand, earth or other noncombustible absorbent material. Large spills: Dike far ahead of liquid spill for later disposal. Prevent entry into waterways, sewers, basements or confined areas.
[U.S. Department of Transportation. 2000 Emergency Response Guidebook. RSPA P 5800.8 Edition. Washington, D.C: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2000,p. G-160]**QC REVIEWED**

First aid: Move victim to fresh air. Call 911 or emergency medical service. Apply artificial respiration if victim is not breathing. Administer oxygen if breathing is difficult. Remove and isolate contaminated clothing and shoes. In case of contact with substance, immediately flush skin or eyes with running water for at least 20 minutes. For minor skin contact, avoid spreading material on unaffected skin. Wash skin with soap and water. Keep victim warm and quiet. Ensure that medical personnel are aware of the material(s) involved, and take precautions to protect themselves.
[U.S. Department of Transportation. 2000 Emergency Response Guidebook. RSPA P 5800.8 Edition. Washington, D.C: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2000,p. G-160]**QC REVIEWED**

Odor Threshold:

The distinctive odor of tetrachloroethylene does not necessarily provide adequate warning. Because tetrachloroethylene quickly desensitizes olfactory responses, persons can suffer exposure to vapor concentrations in excess of TLV limits without smelling it.
[Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology. 3rd ed., Volumes 1-26. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, 1978-1984.5(79) 761]**PEER REVIEWED**

Recognition in air: 4.68 ppm (chemically pure)
[Fazzalari, F.A. (ed.). Compilation of Odor and Taste Threshold Values Data. ASTM Data Series DS 48A (Committee E-18). Philadelphia, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials, 1978.155]**PEER REVIEWED**

Perchloroethylene has a not unpleasant etheral or aromatic odor. ... 50 ppm, odor threshold (very faint) to unacclimated; no physiological effects (8 hr). 100 ppm, odor (faint) definitely apparent to unacclimated; very faint to not perceptible during exposure; no physiological effects (8 hr). 200 ppm, odor (definite) moderate to faint upon exposure; faint to moderate eye irritation; minimal light-headedness; (eye irritation threshold 100-200 ppm). 400 ppm, odor (strong) unpleasant; definite eye irritation, slight nasal irritation; definite incoordination (2 hr). 600 ppm, odor (strong) very unpleasant but tolerable; definite eye & nasal irritation; dizziness, loss of inhibitions (10 min). 1000 ppm, odor (very strong) intense, irritating; markedly irritating to eyes & resp tract; considerable dizziness (2 min). 1500 ppm, odor (almost intolerable) "gagging"; irritation almost intolerable to eyes & nose; complete incoordination within minutes to unconsciousness within 30 min.
[Clayton, G.D., F.E. Clayton (eds.) Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology. Volumes 2A, 2B, 2C, 2D, 2E, 2F: Toxicology. 4th ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1993-1994.4240]**PEER REVIEWED**

Skin, Eye and Respiratory Irritations:

Eye exposure can lead to conjunctivitis; Skin exposure can lead to inflamation; Inhalation can lead to respiratory tract irritation.
[ITII. Toxic and Hazarous Industrial Chemicals Safety Manual. Tokyo, Japan: The International Technical Information Institute, 1982.507]**PEER REVIEWED**

Tetrachloroethylene vapor is a mucous membrane & upper resp irritant at levels above 75 to 100 ppm.
[Ellenhorn, M.J. and D.G. Barceloux. Medical Toxicology - Diagnosis and Treatment of Human Poisoning. New York, NY: Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Inc. 1988.986]**PEER REVIEWED**

Flash Point:

No flash point in conventional closed tester.
[Fire Protection Guide to Hazardous Materials. 12 ed. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association, 1997. 49-125]**PEER REVIEWED**

Fire Fighting Procedures:

Approach from upwind to avoid hazardous vapors and toxic decomposition products. Use water spray to keep fire-exposed containers cool. Use flooding quantities of water as fog or spray. Extinguish fire using agent suitable for surrounding fire.
[Fire Protection Guide to Hazardous Materials. 12 ed. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association, 1997. 49-125]**PEER REVIEWED**

Toxic Combustion Products:

Combustion by-products may include hydrogen chloride and phosgene.
[Fire Protection Guide to Hazardous Materials. 12 ed. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association, 1997. 49-125]**PEER REVIEWED**

Explosive Limits & Potential:

Mixtures with lithium shavings ... are impact-sensitive and will explode, sometimes violently.
[Bretherick, L. Handbook of Reactive Chemical Hazards. 4th ed. Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd., 19901315]**PEER REVIEWED**

The presence of 0.5% of trichloroethylene as impurity in tetrachloroethylene during unheated drying over solid sodium hydroxide caused the generation of dichloroacetylene. After subsequent fractional distillation, the volatile fore-run exploded.
[Bretherick, L. Handbook of Reactive Chemical Hazards. 4th ed. Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd., 1990211]**PEER REVIEWED**

Mixtures of /dinitrogen/ tetraoxide with ... tetrachloroethylene are explosive when subjected to shock of 25 g TNT equivalent or less.
[Bretherick, L. Handbook of Reactive Chemical Hazards. 4th ed. Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd., 19901352]**PEER REVIEWED**

Hazardous Reactivities & Incompatibilities:

Granular barium in contact with ... tetrachloroethylene ... is susceptible to detonation.
[Bretherick, L. Handbook of Reactive Chemical Hazards. 4th ed. Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd., 199078]**PEER REVIEWED**

Reacts with metals to form explosive mixtures; Sodium hydroxide, possible explosion.
[ITII. Toxic and Hazarous Industrial Chemicals Safety Manual. Tokyo, Japan: The International Technical Information Institute, 1982.696]**PEER REVIEWED**

Several cases of violent reaction between aluminum and ... tetrachloroethylene in vapor degreasers have been noted.
[Bretherick, L. Handbook of Reactive Chemical Hazards. 4th ed. Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd., 199026]**PEER REVIEWED**

Strong oxidizers; chemically-active metals such as lithium, beryllium, and barium; caustic soda; sodium hydroxide; potash.
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997.300]**PEER REVIEWED**

Strong oxidizers; chemically active metals such as lithium, beryllium & barium; caustic soda; sodium hydroxide; potash.
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997.300]**PEER REVIEWED**

Hazardous Decomposition:

When in contact with activated charcoal decomposes to form hexachloroethane and hexachlorobenzene at 700 deg C.
[Gonikberg MG et al; Bul Acad Sci USSR Dir Chem Sci p.739 (1956)]**PEER REVIEWED**

... decomposes slowly in contact with moisture to yield trichloroacetic acid and hydrochloric acid
[WHO; Environ Health Criteria: Tetrachloroethylene p.9 (1984)]**PEER REVIEWED**

It affords various decomp products depending on conditions, but mostly hydrogen chloride & phosgene.
[Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology. 3rd ed., Volumes 1-26. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, 1978-1984.5(79) 754]**PEER REVIEWED**

... If involved in a fire decomposes to produce hydrogen chloride and phosgene.
[Fire Protection Guide to Hazardous Materials. 12 ed. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association, 1997. 49-125]**PEER REVIEWED**

Prior History of Accidents:

On September 28, 1982, an Illinois Gulf Railroad freight train derailed 43 cars in Livingston, Louisiana. Thirty-six cars were tank cars, of which 27 contained various regulated hazardous or toxic chemical commodities, 2 contained nonregulated hazardous materials, and 5 contained flammable petroleum products. Fires resulted and toxic gases were released into the atmosphere. Residents within a 5 mile radius of the derailment were evacuated for up to two weeks. More than 200,000 gal of toxic chemical products were spilled and absorbed into the ground. Extensive excavation of the contaminated soil and its transportation to a distant dump site were required. Property damage was estimated to be greater than 14 million dollars and long-term closure of the railroad line and adjacent highway resulted. ... Evacuation of the residents was accomplished successfully although no contingency plan had been developed. The effort to contain and remove chemical pollution resulting from the derailment was directed effectively by the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources. The principal problem was tetrachloroethylene... .
[Nat Transp Safety Board; Railroad Accident Report: Derailment of Illinois Central Gulf Railroad Freight Train Extra 9629 East and Release of Hazardous Materials at Livingston, LA on September 28, 1982 80 pp. (1983) NTSB/RAR-83105]**PEER REVIEWED**

Immediately Dangerous to Life or Health:

NIOSH has recommended that tetrachloroethylene be treated as a potential human carcinogen.
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997.300]**PEER REVIEWED**

Protective Equipment & Clothing:

FOR HIGH VAPOR CONCN USE APPROVED CANISTER OR AIR-SUPPLIED MASK; CHEMICAL GOGGLES OR FACE SHIELD; PLASTIC GLOVES.
[U.S. Coast Guard, Department of Transportation. CHRIS - Hazardous Chemical Data. Volume II. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1984-5.]**PEER REVIEWED**

PRECAUTIONS FOR "CARCINOGENS": ... dispensers of liq detergent /should be available./ ... Safety pipettes should be used for all pipetting. ... In animal laboratory, personnel should ... wear protective suits (preferably disposable, one-piece & close-fitting at ankles & wrists), gloves, hair covering & overshoes. ... In chemical laboratory, gloves & gowns should always be worn ... however, gloves should not be assumed to provide full protection. Carefully fitted masks or respirators may be necessary when working with particulates or gases, & disposable plastic aprons might provide addnl protection. ... gowns ... /should be/ of distinctive color, this is a reminder that they are not to be worn outside the laboratory. /Chemical Carcinogens/
[Montesano, R., H. Bartsch, E.Boyland, G. Della Porta, L. Fishbein, R. A. Griesemer, A.B. Swan, L. Tomatis, and W. Davis (eds.). Handling Chemical Carcinogens in the Laboratory: Problems of Safety. IARC Scientific Publications No. 33. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1979.8]**PEER REVIEWED**

Wear appropriate personal protective clothing to prevent skin contact.
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997.300]**PEER REVIEWED**

Wear appropriate eye protection to prevent eye contact.
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997.300]**PEER REVIEWED**

Eyewash fountains should be provided in areas where there is any possbility that workers could be exposed to the substance; this is irrespective of the recommendation involving the wearing of eye protection.
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997.300]**PEER REVIEWED**

Facilities for quickly drenching the body should be provided within the immediate work area for emergency use where there is a possibility of exposure. [Note: It is intended that these facilities provide a sufficient quantity or flow of water to quickly remove the substance from any body areas likely to be exposed. The actual determination of what constitutes an adequate quick drench facility depends on the specific circumstances. In certain instances, a deluge shower should be readily available, whereas in others, the availability of water from a sink or hose could be considered adequate.]
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997.300]**PEER REVIEWED**

Recommendations for respirator selection. Condition: At concentrations above the NIOSH REL, or where there is no REL, at any detectable concentration. Respirator Class(es): Any self-contained breathing apparatus that has a full facepiece and is operated in a pressure-demand or other positive pressure mode. Any supplied-air respirator that has a full face piece and is operated in pressure-demand or other positive pressure mode in combination with an auxiliary self-contained breathing apparatus operated in pressure-demand or other positive pressure mode.
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997.300]**PEER REVIEWED**

Recommendations for respirator selection. Condition: Escape from suddenly occurring respiratory hazards: Respirator Class(es): Any air-purifying, full-facepiece respirator (gas mask) with a chin-style, front- or back-mounted organic vapor canister. Any appropriate escape-type, self-contained breathing apparatus.
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997.300]**PEER REVIEWED**

Preventive Measures:

Contact lenses should not be worn when working with this chemical.
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997.300]**PEER REVIEWED**

SRP: The scientific literature for the use of contact lenses in industry is conflicting. The benefit or detrimental effects of wearing contact lenses depend not only upon the substance, but also on factors including the form of the substance, characteristics and duration of the exposure, the uses of other eye protection equipment, and the hygiene of the lenses. However, there may be individual substances whose irritating or corrosive properties are such that the wearing of contact lenses would be harmful to the eye. In those specific cases, contact lenses should not be worn. In any event, the usual eye protection equipment should be worn even when contact lenses are in place.
**PEER REVIEWED**

The worker should immediately wash the skin when it becomes contaminated.
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997.301]**PEER REVIEWED**

PRECAUTIONS FOR "CARCINOGENS": Smoking, drinking, eating, storage of food or of food & beverage containers or utensils, & the application of cosmetics should be prohibited in any laboratory. All personnel should remove gloves, if worn, after completion of procedures in which carcinogens have been used. They should ... wash ... hands, preferably using dispensers of liq detergent, & rinse ... thoroughly. Consideration should be given to appropriate methods for cleaning the skin, depending on nature of the contaminant. No standard procedure can be recommended, but the use of organic solvents should be avoided. Safety pipettes should be used for all pipetting. /Chemical Carcinogens/
[Montesano, R., H. Bartsch, E.Boyland, G. Della Porta, L. Fishbein, R. A. Griesemer, A.B. Swan, L. Tomatis, and W. Davis (eds.). Handling Chemical Carcinogens in the Laboratory: Problems of Safety. IARC Scientific Publications No. 33. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1979.8]**PEER REVIEWED**

PRECAUTIONS FOR "CARCINOGENS": In animal laboratory, personnel should remove their outdoor clothes & wear protective suits (preferably disposable, one-piece & close-fitting at ankles & wrists), gloves, hair covering & overshoes. ... clothing should be changed daily but ... discarded immediately if obvious contamination occurs ... /also,/ workers should shower immediately. In chemical laboratory, gloves & gowns should always be worn ... however, gloves should not be assumed to provide full protection. Carefully fitted masks or respirators may be necessary when working with particulates or gases, & disposable plastic aprons might provide addnl protection. If gowns are of distinctive color, this is a reminder that they should not be worn outside of lab. /Chemical Carcinogens/
[Montesano, R., H. Bartsch, E.Boyland, G. Della Porta, L. Fishbein, R. A. Griesemer, A.B. Swan, L. Tomatis, and W. Davis (eds.). Handling Chemical Carcinogens in the Laboratory: Problems of Safety. IARC Scientific Publications No. 33. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1979.8]**PEER REVIEWED**

PRECAUTIONS FOR "CARCINOGENS": ... operations connected with synth & purification ... should be carried out under well-ventilated hood. Analytical procedures ... should be carried out with care & vapors evolved during ... procedures should be removed. ... Expert advice should be obtained before existing fume cupboards are used ... & when new fume cupboards are installed. It is desirable that there be means for decreasing the rate of air extraction, so that carcinogenic powders can be handled without ... powder being blown around the hood. Glove boxes should be kept under negative air pressure. Air changes should be adequate, so that concn of vapors of volatile carcinogens will not occur. /Chemical Carcinogens/
[Montesano, R., H. Bartsch, E.Boyland, G. Della Porta, L. Fishbein, R. A. Griesemer, A.B. Swan, L. Tomatis, and W. Davis (eds.). Handling Chemical Carcinogens in the Laboratory: Problems of Safety. IARC Scientific Publications No. 33. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1979.8]**PEER REVIEWED**

PRECAUTIONS FOR "CARCINOGENS": Vertical laminar-flow biological safety cabinets may be used for containment of in vitro procedures ... provided that the exhaust air flow is sufficient to provide an inward air flow at the face opening of the cabinet, & contaminated air plenums that are under positive pressure are leak-tight. Horizontal laminar-flow hoods or safety cabinets, where filtered air is blown across the working area towards the operator, should never be used ... Each cabinet or fume cupboard to be used ... should be tested before work is begun (eg, with fume bomb) & label fixed to it, giving date of test & avg air-flow measured. This test should be repeated periodically & after any structural changes. /Chemical Carcinogens/
[Montesano, R., H. Bartsch, E.Boyland, G. Della Porta, L. Fishbein, R. A. Griesemer, A.B. Swan, L. Tomatis, and W. Davis (eds.). Handling Chemical Carcinogens in the Laboratory: Problems of Safety. IARC Scientific Publications No. 33. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1979.9]**PEER REVIEWED**

PRECAUTIONS FOR "CARCINOGENS": Principles that apply to chem or biochem lab also apply to microbiological & cell-culture labs ... Special consideration should be given to route of admin. ... Safest method of administering volatile carcinogen is by injection of a soln. Admin by topical application, gavage, or intratracheal instillation should be performed under hood. If chem will be exhaled, animals should be kept under hood during this period. Inhalation exposure requires special equipment. ... unless specifically required, routes of admin other than in the diet should be used. Mixing of carcinogen in diet should be carried out in sealed mixers under fume hood, from which the exhaust is fitted with an efficient particulate filter. Techniques for cleaning mixer & hood should be devised before expt begun. When mixing diets, special protective clothing &, possibly, respirators may be required. /Chemical Carcinogens/
[Montesano, R., H. Bartsch, E.Boyland, G. Della Porta, L. Fishbein, R. A. Griesemer, A.B. Swan, L. Tomatis, and W. Davis (eds.). Handling Chemical Carcinogens in the Laboratory: Problems of Safety. IARC Scientific Publications No. 33. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1979.9]**PEER REVIEWED**

PRECAUTIONS FOR "CARCINOGENS": When ... admin in diet or applied to skin, animals should be kept in cages with solid bottoms & sides & fitted with a filter top. When volatile carcinogens are given, filter tops should not be used. Cages which have been used to house animals that received carcinogens should be decontaminated. Cage-cleaning facilities should be installed in area in which carcinogens are being used, to avoid moving of ... contaminated /cages/. It is difficult to ensure that cages are decontaminated, & monitoring methods are necessary. Situations may exist in which the use of disposable cages should be recommended, depending on type & amt of carcinogen & efficiency with which it can be removed. /Chemical Carcinogens/
[Montesano, R., H. Bartsch, E.Boyland, G. Della Porta, L. Fishbein, R. A. Griesemer, A.B. Swan, L. Tomatis, and W. Davis (eds.). Handling Chemical Carcinogens in the Laboratory: Problems of Safety. IARC Scientific Publications No. 33. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1979.10]**PEER REVIEWED**

PRECAUTIONS FOR "CARCINOGENS": To eliminate risk that ... contamination in lab could build up during conduct of expt, periodic checks should be carried out on lab atmospheres, surfaces, such as walls, floors & benches, & ... interior of fume hoods & airducts. As well as regular monitoring, check must be carried out after cleaning-up of spillage. Sensitive methods are required when testing lab atmospheres for chem such as nitrosamines. Methods ... should ... where possible, be simple & sensitive. ... /Chemical Carcinogens/
[Montesano, R., H. Bartsch, E.Boyland, G. Della Porta, L. Fishbein, R. A. Griesemer, A.B. Swan, L. Tomatis, and W. Davis (eds.). Handling Chemical Carcinogens in the Laboratory: Problems of Safety. IARC Scientific Publications No. 33. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1979.10]**PEER REVIEWED**

PRECAUTIONS FOR "CARCINOGENS": Rooms in which obvious contamination has occurred, such as spillage, should be decontaminated by lab personnel engaged in expt. Design of expt should ... avoid contamination of permanent equipment. ... Procedures should ensure that maintenance workers are not exposed to carcinogens. ... Particular care should be taken to avoid contamination of drains or ventilation ducts. In cleaning labs, procedures should be used which do not produce aerosols or dispersal of dust, ie, wet mop or vacuum cleaner equipped with high-efficiency particulate filter on exhaust, which are avail commercially, should be used. Sweeping, brushing & use of dry dusters or mops should be prohibited. Grossly contaminated cleaning materials should not be re-used ... If gowns or towels are contaminated, they should not be sent to laundry, but ... decontaminated or burnt, to avoid any hazard to laundry personnel. /Chemical Carcinogens/
[Montesano, R., H. Bartsch, E.Boyland, G. Della Porta, L. Fishbein, R. A. Griesemer, A.B. Swan, L. Tomatis, and W. Davis (eds.). Handling Chemical Carcinogens in the Laboratory: Problems of Safety. IARC Scientific Publications No. 33. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1979.10]**PEER REVIEWED**

PRECAUTIONS FOR "CARCINOGENS": Doors leading into areas where carcinogens are used ... should be marked distinctively with appropriate labels. Access ... limited to persons involved in expt. ... A prominently displayed notice should give the name of the Scientific Investigator or other person who can advise in an emergency & who can inform others (such as firemen) on the handling of carcinogenic substances. /Chemical Carcinogens/
[Montesano, R., H. Bartsch, E.Boyland, G. Della Porta, L. Fishbein, R. A. Griesemer, A.B. Swan, L. Tomatis, and W. Davis (eds.). Handling Chemical Carcinogens in the Laboratory: Problems of Safety. IARC Scientific Publications No. 33. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1979.11]**PEER REVIEWED**

The worker should immediately wash the skin when it becomes contaminated.
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997.300]**PEER REVIEWED**

Work clothing that becomes wet or significantly contaminated should be removed or replaced.
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997.300]**PEER REVIEWED**

Stability/Shelf Life:

RAPIDLY DETERIORATES IN WARM CLIMATES
[Goodman, L.S., and A. Gilman. (eds.) The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. 5th ed. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc., 1975.1031]**PEER REVIEWED**

Tetrachloroethylene is stable up to 500 deg C in the absence of catalysts, moisture, and oxygen.
[WHO; Environ Health Criteria: Tetrachloroethylene p.9 (1984)]**PEER REVIEWED**

THE MATERIAL IS EXTREMELY STABLE & RESISTS HYDROLYSIS
[Sax, N.I. Dangerous Properties of Industrial Materials. 6th ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1984.2518]**PEER REVIEWED**

PURE CMPD IS SLOWLY DECOMP BY VARIOUS METALS IN PRESENCE OF MOISTURE
[Osol, A. (ed.). Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences. 16th ed. Easton, Pennsylvania: Mack Publishing Co., 1980.1177]**PEER REVIEWED**

The physical stability of emulsions of tetrachloroethylene can be enhanced by diluting the tetrachloroethylene with arachis oil before emulsification. This practice may be harmful because the oil increases the absorption, & thus the toxicity, of the drug.
[Reynolds, J.E.F., Prasad, A.B. (eds.) Martindale-The Extra Pharmacopoeia. 28th ed. London: The Pharmaceutical Press, 1982.107]**PEER REVIEWED**

Shipment Methods and Regulations:

PRECAUTIONS FOR "CARCINOGENS": Procurement ... of unduly large amt ... should be avoided. To avoid spilling, carcinogens should be transported in securely sealed glass bottles or ampoules, which should themselves be placed inside strong screw-cap or snap-top container that will not open when dropped & will resist attack from the carcinogen. Both bottle & the outside container should be appropriately labelled. ... National post offices, railway companies, road haulage companies & airlines have regulations governing transport of hazardous materials. These authorities should be consulted before ... material is shipped. /Chemical Carcinogens/
[Montesano, R., H. Bartsch, E.Boyland, G. Della Porta, L. Fishbein, R. A. Griesemer, A.B. Swan, L. Tomatis, and W. Davis (eds.). Handling Chemical Carcinogens in the Laboratory: Problems of Safety. IARC Scientific Publications No. 33. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1979.13]**PEER REVIEWED**

PRECAUTIONS FOR "CARCINOGENS": When no regulations exist, the following procedure must be adopted. The carcinogen should be enclosed in a securely sealed, watertight container (primary container), which should be enclosed in a second, unbreakable, leakproof container that will withstand chem attack from the carcinogen (secondary container). The space between primary & secondary container should be filled with absorbent material, which would withstand chem attack from the carcinogen & is sufficient to absorb the entire contents of the primary container in the event of breakage or leakage. Each secondary container should then be enclosed in a strong outer box. The space between the secondary container & the outer box should be filled with an appropriate quantity of shock-absorbent material. Sender should use fastest & most secure form of transport & notify recipient of its departure. If parcel is not received when expected, carrier should be informed so that immediate effort can be made to find it. Traffic schedules should be consulted to avoid ... arrival on weekend or holiday ... /Chemical Carcinogens/
[Montesano, R., H. Bartsch, E.Boyland, G. Della Porta, L. Fishbein, R. A. Griesemer, A.B. Swan, L. Tomatis, and W. Davis (eds.). Handling Chemical Carcinogens in the Laboratory: Problems of Safety. IARC Scientific Publications No. 33. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1979.13]**PEER REVIEWED**

No person may /transport,/ offer or accept a hazardous material for transportation in commerce unless that person is registered in conformance ... and the hazardous material is properly classed, described, packaged, marked, labeled, and in condition for shipment as required or authorized by ... /the hazardous materials regulations (49 CFR 171-177)./
[49 CFR 171.2 (7/1/2000)]**PEER REVIEWED**

The International Air Transport Association (IATA) Dangerous Goods Regulations are published by the IATA Dangerous Goods Board pursuant to IATA Resolutions 618 and 619 and constitute a manual of industry carrier regulations to be followed by all IATA Member airlines when transporting hazardous materials.
[IATA. Dangerous Goods Regulations. 41st Ed.Montreal, Canada and Geneva, Switzerland: International Air Transport Association, Dangerous Goods Regulations, 2000. 224]**PEER REVIEWED**

The International Maritime Dangerous Goods Code lays down basic principles for transporting hazardous chemicals. Detailed recommendations for individual substances and a number of recommendations for good practice are included in the classes dealing with such substances. A general index of technical names has also been compiled. This index should always be consulted when attempting to locate the appropriate procedures to be used when shipping any substance or article.
[IMDG; International Maritime Dangerous Goods Code; International Maritime Organization p.6264 (1998)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Storage Conditions:

STORE IN COOL, DRY, WELL-VENTILATED LOCATION. SEPARATE FROM ACTIVE METALS. ISOLATE FROM OPEN FLAMES, AND COMBUSTIBLES.
[Fire Protection Guide to Hazardous Materials. 12 ed. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association, 1997. 49-125]**PEER REVIEWED**

It is stored in mild steel tanks equipped with breathing vents & chemical driers. It can be transferred through seamless black iron pipes, with gasketing materials of compressed asbestos, asbestos reinforced with metal, or asbestos impregnated with Teflon or Viton, employing centrifugal or positive displacement pumps of cast iron or steel construction. Small quantities ... may be stored safely in green or amber glass containers.
[Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology. 3rd ed., Volumes 1-26. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, 1978-1984.5(79) 759]**PEER REVIEWED**

TEMPERATURE: AMBIENT. VENTING: PRESSURE-VACUUM.
[U.S. Coast Guard, Department of Transportation. CHRIS - Hazardous Chemical Data. Volume II. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1984-5.]**PEER REVIEWED**

PRECAUTIONS FOR "CARCINOGENS": Storage site should be as close as practicable to lab in which carcinogens are to be used, so that only small quantities required for ... expt need to be carried. Carcinogens should be kept in only one section of cupboard, an explosion-proof refrigerator or freezer (depending on chemicophysical properties ...) that bears appropriate label. An inventory ... should be kept, showing quantity of carcinogen & date it was acquired ... Facilities for dispensing ... should be contiguous to storage area. /Chemical Carcinogens/
[Montesano, R., H. Bartsch, E.Boyland, G. Della Porta, L. Fishbein, R. A. Griesemer, A.B. Swan, L. Tomatis, and W. Davis (eds.). Handling Chemical Carcinogens in the Laboratory: Problems of Safety. IARC Scientific Publications No. 33. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1979.13]**PEER REVIEWED**

Cleanup Methods:

1. VENTILATE AREA OF SPILL OR LEAK. 2. COLLECT FOR RECLAMATION OR ABSORB IN VERMICULITE, DRY SAND, EARTH, OR A SIMILAR MATERIAL.
[Mackison, F. W., R. S. Stricoff, and L. J. Partridge, Jr. (eds.). NIOSH/OSHA - Occupational Health Guidelines for Chemical Hazards. DHHS(NIOSH) Publication No. 81-123 (3 VOLS). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, Jan. 1981.4]**PEER REVIEWED**

PRECAUTIONS FOR "CARCINOGENS": A high-efficiency particulate arrestor (HEPA) or charcoal filters can be used to minimize amt of carcinogen in exhausted air ventilated safety cabinets, lab hoods, glove boxes or animal rooms ... Filter housing that is designed so that used filters can be transferred into plastic bag without contaminating maintenance staff is avail commercially. Filters should be placed in plastic bags immediately after removal ... The plastic bag should be sealed immediately ... The sealed bag should be labelled properly ... Waste liquids ... should be placed or collected in proper containers for disposal. The lid should be secured & the bottles properly labelled. Once filled, bottles should be placed in plastic bag, so that outer surface ... is not contaminated ... The plastic bag should also be sealed & labelled. ... Broken glassware ... should be decontaminated by solvent extraction, by chemical destruction, or in specially designed incinerators. /Chemical Carcinogens/
[Montesano, R., H. Bartsch, E.Boyland, G. Della Porta, L. Fishbein, R. A. Griesemer, A.B. Swan, L. Tomatis, and W. Davis (eds.). Handling Chemical Carcinogens in the Laboratory: Problems of Safety. IARC Scientific Publications No. 33. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1979.15]**PEER REVIEWED**

Approach release from upwind. Stop or control the leak, if this can be done without undue risk. Control runoff and isolate discharged material for proper disposal.
[Fire Protection Guide to Hazardous Materials. 12 ed. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association, 1997. 49-125]**PEER REVIEWED**

Disposal Methods:

Generators of waste (equal to or greater than 100 kg/mo) containing this contaminant, EPA hazardous waste number F002; U210, must conform with USEPA regulations in storage, transportation, treatment and disposal of waste.
[40 CFR 240-280, 300-306, 702-799 (7/1/2000)]**PEER REVIEWED**

TETRACHLOROETHYLENE MAY BE DISPOSED OF BY ABSORBING IT IN VERMICULITE, DRY SAND, EARTH OR SIMILAR MATERIAL & DISPOSING IN A SECURED SANITARY LANDFILL /SRP: MORE DESIRABLE METHODS OF DISPOSAL ARE AVAILABLE/
[Mackison, F. W., R. S. Stricoff, and L. J. Partridge, Jr. (eds.). NIOSH/OSHA - Occupational Health Guidelines for Chemical Hazards. DHHS(NIOSH) Publication No. 81-123 (3 VOLS). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, Jan. 1981.5]**PEER REVIEWED**

... Tower aeration is the most cost-effective technique for removing volatile organic chlorine chemicals from drinking water. /Volatile organic chlorine chemicals/
[Clark RM et al; J Environ Eng 110 (6): 1146-62 (1984)]**PEER REVIEWED**

PRECAUTIONS FOR "CARCINOGENS": There is no universal method of disposal that has been proved satisfactory for all carcinogenic compounds & specific methods of chem destruction ... published have not been tested on all kinds of carcinogen-containing waste. ... summary of avail methods & recommendations ... /given/ must be treated as guide only. /Chemical Carcinogens/
[Montesano, R., H. Bartsch, E.Boyland, G. Della Porta, L. Fishbein, R. A. Griesemer, A.B. Swan, L. Tomatis, and W. Davis (eds.). Handling Chemical Carcinogens in the Laboratory: Problems of Safety. IARC Scientific Publications No. 33. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1979.14]**PEER REVIEWED**

PRECAUTIONS FOR "CARCINOGENS": Total destruction ... by incineration may be only feasible method for disposal of contaminated laboratory waste from biological expt. However, not all incinerators are suitable for this purpose.The most efficient type ... is probably the gas-fired type, in which a first-stage combustion with a less than stoichiometric air:fuel ratio is followed by a second stage with excess air. Some ... are designed to accept ... aqueous & organic-solvent solutions, otherwise it is necessary ... to absorb soln onto suitable combustible material, such as sawdust. Alternatively, chem destruction may be used, esp when small quantities ... are to be destroyed in laboratory. /Chemical Carcinogens/
[Montesano, R., H. Bartsch, E.Boyland, G. Della Porta, L. Fishbein, R. A. Griesemer, A.B. Swan, L. Tomatis, and W. Davis (eds.). Handling Chemical Carcinogens in the Laboratory: Problems of Safety. IARC Scientific Publications No. 33. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1979.15]**PEER REVIEWED**

PRECAUTIONS FOR "CARCINOGENS": HEPA (high-efficiency particulate arrestor) filters ... can be disposed of by incineration. For spent charcoal filters, the adsorbed material can be stripped off at high temp & carcinogenic wastes generated by this treatment conducted to & burned in an incinerator. ... LIQUID WASTE: ... Disposal should be carried out by incineration at temp that ... ensure complete combustion. SOLID WASTE: Carcasses of lab animals, cage litter & misc solid wastes ... should be disposed of by incineration at temp high enough to ensure destruction of chem carcinogens or their metabolites. /Chemical Carcinogens/
[Montesano, R., H. Bartsch, E.Boyland, G. Della Porta, L. Fishbein, R. A. Griesemer, A.B. Swan, L. Tomatis, and W. Davis (eds.). Handling Chemical Carcinogens in the Laboratory: Problems of Safety. IARC Scientific Publications No. 33. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1979.15]**PEER REVIEWED**

PRECAUTIONS FOR "CARCINOGENS": ... small quantities of ... some carcinogens can be destroyed using chem reactions ... but no general rules can be given. ... As a general technique ... treatment with sodium dichromate in strong sulfuric acid can be used. The time necessary for destruction ... is seldom known ... but 1-2 days is generally considered sufficient when freshly prepd reagent is used. ... Carcinogens that are easily oxidizable can be destroyed with milder oxidative agents, such as sat soln of potassium permanganate in acetone, which appears to be a suitable agent for destruction of hydrazines or of compounds containing isolated carbon-carbon double bonds. Concn or 50% aqueous sodium hypochlorite can also be used as an oxidizing agent. /Chemical Carcinogens/
[Montesano, R., H. Bartsch, E.Boyland, G. Della Porta, L. Fishbein, R. A. Griesemer, A.B. Swan, L. Tomatis, and W. Davis (eds.). Handling Chemical Carcinogens in the Laboratory: Problems of Safety. IARC Scientific Publications No. 33. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1979.16]**PEER REVIEWED**

PRECAUTIONS FOR "CARCINOGENS": Carcinogens that are alkylating, arylating, or acylating agents per se can be destroyed by reaction with appropriate nucleophiles, such as water, hydroxyl ions, ammonia, thiols, & thiosulfate. The reactivity of various alkylating agents varies greatly ... & is also influenced by sol of agent in the reaction medium. To facilitate the complete reaction, it is suggested that the agents be dissolved in ethanol or similar solvents. ... No method should be applied ... until it has been thoroughly tested for its effectiveness & safety on material to be inactivated. For example, in case of destruction of alkylating agents, it is possible to detect residual compounds by reaction with 4(4-nitrobenzyl)-pyridine. /Chemical Carcinogens/
[Montesano, R., H. Bartsch, E.Boyland, G. Della Porta, L. Fishbein, R. A. Griesemer, A.B. Swan, L. Tomatis, and W. Davis (eds.). Handling Chemical Carcinogens in the Laboratory: Problems of Safety. IARC Scientific Publications No. 33. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1979.17]**PEER REVIEWED**

Chemical Treatability of Tetrachloroethylene; Concentration Process: Activated carbon; Chemical Classification: Halocarbon; Scale of Study: Laboratory scale; Type of Wastewater Used: Well water; Results of Study: Performance for treatment of water containing several halogens. Virgin: 5100 BV to 33 ppb compound leakage; 13.3 days; gal treated/cu ft sorbent, 38,250. Regenerated: 4000 BV to 33 ppb compound leakage; 10.4 days; gal treated/cu ft sorbent, 30.0; (column studies 14 mm diameter glass tubes, height 4 in (15 cu cm absorbent) Flow-2 gpm/cu ft (16 BV/hr) regenerated at 37 lb steam/cu ft @ 5 psig).
[USEPA; Management of Hazardous Waste Leachate, EPA Contract No. 68-03-2766 p.E-159 (1982)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Chemical Treatability of Tetrachloroethylene; Concentration Process: Resin Adsorption; Chemical Classification: Halocarbon; Scale of Study: Laboratory Scale; Type of Wastewater Used: Well Water; Comments: Column studies: 14 mm diameter glass tubes, height 4 in (15 cu cm adsorbent) Flow-2 gpm/cu ft (16 BV/hr) regenerated at 37 lb steam/cu ft @ 5 psig.
[USEPA; Management of Hazardous Waste Leachate, EPA Contract No. 68-03-2766 p.E-192 (1982)]**PEER REVIEWED**

A potential candidate for liquid injection incineration at a temperature range of 650 to 1,600 deg C and a residence time of 0.1 to 2 seconds. A potential candidate for rotary kiln incineration at a temperature range of 820 to 1,600 deg C and residence times of seconds for liquids and gases, and hours for solids. A potential candidate for fluidized bed incineration at a temperature range of 450 to 980 deg C and residence times of seconds for liquids and gases, and longer for solids.
[USEPA; Engineering Handbook for Hazardous Waste Incineration p.3-15 (1981) EPA 68-03-3025]**PEER REVIEWED**

Incineration, preferably after mixing with another combustible fuel. Care must be exercised to assure complete combustion to prevent the formation of phosgene. An acid scrubber is necessary to remove the halo acids produced. Alternatively, it may be recovered from waste gases and reused. Recommendable method: Incineration.
[United Nations. Treatment and Disposal Methods for Waste Chemicals (IRPTC File). Data Profile Series No. 5. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations Environmental Programme, Dec. 1985.180]**PEER REVIEWED**

Occupational Exposure Standards:

OSHA Standards:

Permissible Exposure Limit: Table Z-2 8-hr Time Weighted Avg: 100 ppm.
[29 CFR 1910.1000 (7/1/2000)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Permissible Exposure Limit: Table Z-2 Acceptable Ceiling Concentration: 200 ppm.
[29 CFR 1910.1000 (7/1/2000)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Permissible Exposure Limit: Table Z-2 Acceptable maximum peak above the acceptable ceiling concentration for an 8-hour shift. Concentration: 300 ppm. Maximum Duration: 5 minutes in any 3 hours.
[29 CFR 1910.1000 (7/1/2000)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Vacated 1989 OSHA PEL TWA 25 ppm (170 mg/cu m) is still enforced in some states.
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997.372]**PEER REVIEWED**

Threshold Limit Values:

8 hr Time Weighted Avg (TWA) 25 ppm; Short Term Exposure Limit (STEL) 100 ppm
[American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. TLVs and BEIs. Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices. Cincinnati, OH. 2000.55]**PEER REVIEWED**

BEI (Biological Exposure Index) for Perchloroethylene: Perchloroethylene in end-exhaled air prior to the last shift of workweek is 5 ppm. (1997 adoption)
[American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. TLVs and BEIs. Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices. Cincinnati, OH. 2000.101]**PEER REVIEWED**

BEI (Biological Exposure Index) for Perchloroethylene: Perchloroethylene in blood prior to the last shift of workweek is 0.5 mg/l. (1997 adoption)
[American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. TLVs and BEIs. Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices. Cincinnati, OH. 2000.101]**PEER REVIEWED**

BEI (Biological Exposure Index) for Perchloroethylene: Trichloroacetic acid in urine at end of shift at end of workweek is 3.5 mg/l. The determinant is nonspecific, since it is observed after exposure to other chemicals. The biological determinant is an indicator of exposure to the chemical, but the quantitative interpretation of the measurement is ambiguous. These determinants should be used as a screening test if a quantitative test is not practical or as a confirmatory test if the quantitative test is not specific and the origin of the determinant is in question. (1997 Adoption)
[American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. TLVs and BEIs. Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices. Cincinnati, OH. 2000.101]**PEER REVIEWED**

A3: Confirmed animal carcinogen with unknown relevance to humans.
[American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. TLVs and BEIs. Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices. Cincinnati, OH. 2000.55]**PEER REVIEWED**

NIOSH Recommendations:

NIOSH recommends that tetrachloroethylene be regulated as a potential human carcinogen.
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997.300]**PEER REVIEWED**

NIOSH usually recommends that occupational exposures to carcinogens be limited to the lowest feasible concn.
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997.300]**PEER REVIEWED**

Minimize workplace exposure concentrations; limit number of workers exposed.
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997.300]**PEER REVIEWED**

Immediately Dangerous to Life or Health:

NIOSH has recommended that tetrachloroethylene be treated as a potential human carcinogen.
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997.300]**PEER REVIEWED**

Other Occupational Permissible Levels:

Maximum allowable concentrations range from 10 mg/cu m (1.5 ppm, ceiling value) in the USSR, 140 mg/cu m (20 ppm, TWA) in Sweden, and 250 mg/cu m (37 ppm) in Czechoslovakia to 340 mg/cu m (50 ppm) in the Federal Republic of Germany, Japan. Short-term exposure limits range from 340 mg/cu m (50 ppm) in Sweden to 1250 mg/cu m (183 ppm) in Czechoslovakia and 1340 mg/cu m (200 ppm) in the USA. The acceptable limit in Brazil is 525 mg/cu m (78 ppm) for 48 hr per week.
[WHO; Environ Health Criteria: Tetrachloroethylene p.35 (1984)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Maximum allowable concentrations are 1.0 mg/cu m average per day or 4.0 mg/cu m average per 0.5 hr in Czechoslovakia and 0.06 mg/cu m average per day in the USSR.
[WHO; Environ Health Criteria: Tetrachloroethylene p.35 (1984)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Emergency Response Planning Guidelines (ERPG): ERPG(1) 100 ppm (no more than mild, transient effects) for up to 1 hr exposure; ERPG(2) 200 ppm (without serious, adverse effects) for up to 1 hr exposure; ERPG(3) 1000 ppm (not life threatening) up to 1 hr exposure.
[American Industrial Hygiene Association. The AIHA 2000 Emergency Response Planning Guidelines and Workplace Environmental Exposure Level Guides Handbook. AIHA Press, Fairfax, VA. 2000. 27]**PEER REVIEWED**

Manufacturing/Use Information:

Major Uses:

For Tetrachloroethylene (USEPA/OPP Pesticide Code: 078501) there are 0 labels match. /SRP: Not registered for current use in the U.S., but approved pesticide uses may change periodically and so federal, state and local authorities must be consulted for currently approved uses./
[U.S. Environmental Protection Agency/Office of Pesticide Program's Chemical Ingredients Database on Tetrachloroethylene (127-18-4). Available from the Database Query page at http://www.cdpr.ca.gov/docs/epa/epamenu.htm as of Sept 8, 2000.]**PEER REVIEWED**

Used in the textile industry for dry-cleaning & for processing & finishing; used in both cold cleaning & vapor degreasing of metals; it is used as a chem intermediate in the synthesis of fluorocarbon 113, 114, 115, & 116; it is used as a heat-exchange fluid
[IARC. Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Man. Geneva: World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1972-PRESENT. (Multivolume work).V20 494 (197)]**PEER REVIEWED**

SCOURING, SIZING & DESIZING AGENT IN TEXTILE MANUFACTURE
[SRI]**PEER REVIEWED**

COMPONENT OF AEROSOL LAUNDRY-TREATMENT PRODUCTS
[SRI]**PEER REVIEWED**

SOLVENT, EG, FOR SILICONES
[SRI]**PEER REVIEWED**

Insulating fluid and cooling gas in electric transformers
[Budavari, S. (ed.). The Merck Index - An Encyclopedia of Chemicals, Drugs, and Biologicals. Whitehouse Station, NJ: Merck and Co., Inc., 1996.1571]**PEER REVIEWED**

In typewriter correction fluids (eg, Liquid Paper, Wite-Out, Snopake, etc)
[Greer JE; South Med J 77 (3): 297-8 (1984)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Formerly used, but no longer approved, in mixtures with grain protectants and certain liquid grain fumigants
[Farm Chemicals Handbook 87. Willoughby, Ohio: Meister Publishing Co., 1987.C-248]**PEER REVIEWED**

MEDICATION (VET): After the advent of phenothiazine ... little use has been made of the chlorinated hydrocarbons ... /as a ruminant anthelmintic/. Tetrachloroethylene has continued to be used in small animals over the years but has been largely replaced by drugs that are less toxic & easier to admin.
[Booth, N.H., L.E. McDonald (eds.). Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 5th ed. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press, 1982.839]**PEER REVIEWED**

Manufacturers:

Dow Chemical USA, Hq 2030 Dow Center, Midland, MI 48674, (517) 636-1000; Production site: Plaquemine, LA 70764
[SRI. 1999 Directory of Chemical Producers -United States. Menlo Park, CA. SRI Consulting 1999.780]**PEER REVIEWED**

PPG Industries, Inc, Hq One PPG Place, Pittsburgh, PA 15272, (412) 434-3131; Production site: Chemicals Group, Lake Charles, LA 70601
[SRI. 1999 Directory of Chemical Producers -United States. Menlo Park, CA. SRI Consulting 1999.780]**PEER REVIEWED**

Vulcan Materials Company, Metal Division, Hq, PO Box 530930, Birmingham, AL 35253, (205) 877-3000; Vulcan Chemicals, division, PO Box 7689, Birmingham, AL 35253; Production site: Geismar, LA 70734
[SRI. 1999 Directory of Chemical Producers -United States. Menlo Park, CA. SRI Consulting 1999.780]**PEER REVIEWED**

Methods of Manufacturing:

Manufactured by catalytic oxidn of 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane: Ellsworth, vancamp, US patent 2,951,103 (1960 to Columbia-Southern Chem); Feathers, Rogerson, US patent 3,040,109 (1962 to Pittsburgh Plate Glass) ... by catalytic chlorination of acetylene: Thermet, Parvi, US patent 2,938,931 (1960 to Societe d'electrochimie, d'electrometallurgie et des acieries electriques d'Ugine).
[Budavari, S. (ed.). The Merck Index - An Encyclopedia of Chemicals, Drugs, and Biologicals. Whitehouse Station, NJ: Merck and Co., Inc., 1996.1571]**PEER REVIEWED**

Prepared primarily by two processes: (1) The Huels method whereby direct chlorination of ethylene yields 70% perchloroethylene, 20% carbon tetrachloride, and 10% other chlorinated products; (2) Hydrocarbons such as methane, ethane, or propane are simultaneously chlorinated and pyrolyzed to yield over 95% perchloroethylene plus carbon tetrachloride and hydrochloric acid.
[Fishbein L; Potential Indust Carcin & Mutagens p.148 (1977) USEPA 560/5-77-005]**PEER REVIEWED**

Tetrachloroethylene is produced mainly by oxyhydrochlorination, perchlorination, and/or dehydrochlorination of hydrocarbons or chlorinated hydrocarbons such as 1,2 dichloroethane, propylene, propylene dichloride, and 1,1,2-trichloroethane.
[WHO; Environ Health Criteria: Tetrachloroethylene p.15 (1984)]**PEER REVIEWED**

General Manufacturing Information:

Method of purification: distillation
[Lewis, R.J., Sr (Ed.). Hawley's Condensed Chemical Dictionary. 13th ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1997. 850]**PEER REVIEWED**

Formulations/Preparations:

Available in the United States ... in veterinary preparations (eg, Nema Worm Capsules (Parke-Davis)). These capsules contain pure tetrachloroethylene. Avail sizes are 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, 2.5 & 5 ml.
[American Medical Association, Department of Drugs. Drug Evaluations. 6th ed. Chicago, Ill: American Medical Association, 1986.1612]**PEER REVIEWED**

Tetrachloroethylene is avail in the USA in the following grades: purified, technical, USP, spectrophotometric, & dry-cleaning. The technical & dry-cleaning grades both meet specifications for technical grade & differ only in the amount of stabilizer added to prevent decomposition. Stabilizers ... incl amines or mixtures of epoxides & esters. Typical analysis of the commercial grade is ... nonvolatile residue, 0.0003%; free chlorine, none; moisture, no cloud at -5 deg C ... USP grade contains not less than 99.0% & no more than 99.5% tetrachloroethylene, the remainder consisting of ethanol. ...
[IARC. Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Man. Geneva: World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1972-PRESENT. (Multivolume work).V20 492 (1979)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Food Grade
[Kuney, J.H. and J.N. Nullican (eds.) Chemcyclopedia. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society, 1988.116]**PEER REVIEWED**

/Tetrachloroethylene (BP) may/ ... contain thymol 0.01% wt/wt as a preservative.
[Reynolds, J.E.F., Prasad, A.B. (eds.) Martindale-The Extra Pharmacopoeia. 28th ed. London: The Pharmaceutical Press, 1982.106]**PEER REVIEWED**

Tetrachloroethylene Capsules (USP, BP, 1973)
[Reynolds, J.E.F., Prasad, A.B. (eds.) Martindale-The Extra Pharmacopoeia. 28th ed. London: The Pharmaceutical Press, 1982.107]**PEER REVIEWED**

Tetrachloroethylene Draught (BNF, 1966): tetrachloroethylene 2.5 ml, acacia 2 g, peppermint emulsion 0.3 ml, chloroform water to 50 ml.
[Reynolds, J.E.F., Prasad, A.B. (eds.) Martindale-The Extra Pharmacopoeia. 28th ed. London: The Pharmaceutical Press, 1982.107]**PEER REVIEWED**

Perklone (ICI Mond, UK): a brand of tetrachloroethylene for dry-cleaning purposes.
[Reynolds, J.E.F., Prasad, A.B. (eds.) Martindale-The Extra Pharmacopoeia. 28th ed. London: The Pharmaceutical Press, 1982.107]**PEER REVIEWED**

Consumption Patterns:

The consumption pattern in the USA in 1974 is est to have been as follows: Textile and dry cleaning industries, 69%; Metal cleaning, 16%; Chemical intermediate (eg, prepn of trichloroacetic acid in some fluorocarbons), 12%; Miscellaneous uses, 3%.
[Fishbein L; Potential Indust Carcins & Mutagens p.148 (1977) EPA-560/5-77-005]**PEER REVIEWED**

Demand: (1982), 545 million lb; (1983), 679 million lb; (1987), 625 million lb
[Kavaler. Chem Market Reporter 1983]**PEER REVIEWED**

(1974) Dry cleaning & textile processing, 59%; Industrial metal cleaning, 21%; Exports, 11%; Chemical intermed (mostly fluorocarbons), 6%; Other, 3%.
[Kavaler. Chem Market Reporter 1983]**PEER REVIEWED**

SOLVENT IN DRY CLEANING, 46%; DEGREASING SOLVENT, 21%; CHEM INTERMED FOR FLUOROCARBONS, 12%; AGENT IN TEXTILE MFR, 7%; COMPONENT OF AEROSOL PRODUCTS, 2%; OTHER, 12% (1980, EST)
[SRI]**PEER REVIEWED**

CHEMICAL PROFILE: Perchloroethylene. Demand: 1988: 495 million lb; 1989: 495 million lb; 1993 /projected/: 495 million lb. (Includes exports, but not imports, which totaled 121 million lb last yr).
[Kavaler AR; Chemical Marketing Reporter 235 (6): 46 (1989)]**PEER REVIEWED**

CHEMICAL PROFILE: Perchloroethylene. Dry cleaning and textile processing, 50%; chemical intermediate (mostly fluorocarbon F-113), 28%; industrial metal cleaning, 9%; exports, 10%; other, 3%.
[Kavaler AR; Chemical Marketing Reporter 235 (6): 46 (1989)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Demand: (1996) 280 million pounds; (1997) 290 million pounds; (2001, projected) 335 million pounds
[Chemical Marketing Reporter; Chemical Profile Tetrachloroethylene. December 15, 1997. NY, NY: Schnell Pub Co (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

(1998) 312 million pounds; (1999) 318 million pounds; (2003) /projected/ 340 million pounds
[ChemExpo; Chemical Profile Database on Perchloroethylene (127-18-4). 10/30/00. Available from the Database Query page at http://www.chemexpo.com/news/newsframe.cfm?framebody=/news/profile.cfm as of Nov 6, 2000.]**PEER REVIEWED**

Chemical precursor, 50 percent; dry cleaning, 21 percent; metal cleaning and vapor degreasing, 18 percent; other, 11 percent.
[ChemExpo; Chemical Profile Database on Perchloroethylene (127-18-4). 10/30/00. Available from the Database Query page at http://www.chemexpo.com/news/newsframe.cfm?framebody=/news/profile.cfm as of Nov 6, 2000.]**PEER REVIEWED**

U. S. Production:

(1981) 3.16X10+11 GRAMS
[US INT'L TRADE COMM. SOC SERIES C/P-82-1]**PEER REVIEWED**

(1976) 121x10+6 lb
[Fishbein L; Potential Indust Carcins & Mutagens p.35 (1977) USEPA 560/ 5-77-005]**PEER REVIEWED**

(1978) 3.34X10+11 G
[SRI]**PEER REVIEWED**

(1983) 2.40X10+11 G
[SRI]**PEER REVIEWED**

(1985) 3.08X10+11 g
[USITC. SYN ORG CHEM-U.S. PROD/SALES 1985 p.268]**PEER REVIEWED**

(1986) 4.05X10+8 LB
[USITC. SYN ORG CHEM-U.S. PROD/SALES. PRELIMINARY 1988 SERIES C/P-87-5]**PEER REVIEWED**

(1987) 4.70X10+8 LB
[USITC. SYN ORG CHEM-U.S. PROD/SALES. PRELIMINARY 1988 SERIES C/P-87-5]**PEER REVIEWED**

(1982) 550 million lb
[USITC; USITC Publications 1422 (1983) as cited in USEPA; Health Advisories for 25 Organics: Tetrachloroethylene p.306 (1987) PB 87-235578]**PEER REVIEWED**

(1974) 333,100 tons; (1976) 303,400 tons; (1978) 333,400 tons; (1980) 347,100 tons; (1982) 265,300 tons; (1984) 260,000 tons; (1986) 187,800 tons; (1988) 225,800 tons; (1989) 218,300 tons; (1990) 132,300 tons.
[Chemical Marketing Reporter; Chemical Profile Tetrachloroethylene. December 15, 1997. NY, NY: Schnell Pub Co (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

U. S. Imports:

(1977) 5.98X10+10 G
[SRI]**PEER REVIEWED**

(1982) 1.70X10+10 G
[SRI]**PEER REVIEWED**

(1985) 6.36X10+10 g
[BUREAU OF THE CENSUS. U.S. IMPORTS FOR CONSUMPTION AND GENERAL IMPORTS 1985 p.1-584]**PEER REVIEWED**

(1986) 1.83X10+5 LB
[BUREAU OF THE CENSUS. US IMPORTS FOR CONSUMPTION AND GENERAL IMPORTS 1986 P.1-530]**PEER REVIEWED**

61 million pounds in 1996.
[Chemical Marketing Reporter; Chemical Profile Tetrachloroethylene. December 15, 1997. NY, NY: Schnell Pub Co (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

U. S. Exports:

(1978) 2.90X10+10 G
[SRI]**PEER REVIEWED**

(1983) 2.47X10+10 G
[SRI]**PEER REVIEWED**

(1985) 9.84X10+9 g
[BUREAU OF THE CENSUS. U.S. EXPORTS, SCHEDULE E, 1985 p.2-69]**PEER REVIEWED**

48 million pounds in 1996.
[Chemical Marketing Reporter; Chemical Profile Tetrachloroethylene. December 15, 1997. NY, NY: Schnell Pub Co (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Laboratory Methods:

Clinical Laboratory Methods:

DETERMINATION OF TETRACHLOROETHYLENE IN FISH BY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY; DETECTION LIMITS IN 0.1-1.0 PPB RANGE.
[OFSTAD EB ET AL; THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 20: 205-16 (1981)]**PEER REVIEWED**

The expired breath of subjects, exposed for periods of approx 90 min to atmospheres artificially contaminated with low levels ... tetrachloroethylene (approx 50 ppm), was monitored during and after the exposure period using an atm pressure ionization mass spectrometer (API/MS), fitted with a direct breath analysis system. The retention of solvent by the subjects estimated from steady state levels in the expired breath, averaged 87%. The elimination of unchanged solvent via respiration during the post exposure period followed first order kinetics a with mean half-life value of 79 min.
[Benoit FM et al; Int Arch Occup Health 55 (2): 113-20 (1985)]**PEER REVIEWED**

NIOSH Method 3704. Perchloroethylene in exhaled breath and air. Portable GC/PID.
[U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods. 4th ed. Methods A-Z & Supplements. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, Aug 1994.]**PEER REVIEWED**

 

Analytic Laboratory Methods:

A freeze-out concn method is used to determine trace levels of tetrachloroethylene in the presence of other cmpd. Detection limit is 0.2 ppt (1.36X10-6 mg/cu m) for 500 ml aliquots of ambient air samples. Samples are measured by gas chromatography coupled with electron capture configuration. When freeze-out is completed, tetrachloroethylene remains behind; While oxygen and nitrogen gasses are passed through as the freeze-out loop is heated. Carrier gas sweeps the contents onto the column.
[Rasmussen RA et al; J Air Poll Cont Assoc 27: 579 (1977)]**PEER REVIEWED**

DETERMINATION OF TRACE AMT OF 136 C1-C13 ORG CMPD (INCL TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) IN AIR SAMPLES COLLECTED FROM THE ATMOSPHERE OF STREETS BY GC IS DISCUSSED.
[IOFFE BV ET AL; J CHROMATOGR 142: 787-95 (1977)]**PEER REVIEWED**

TETRACHLOROETHYLENE IN DRINKING WATER IS ANALYZED DIRECTLY WITH GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY EQUIPPED WITH ELECTRON CAPTURE DETECTION. THE LIMIT OF DETECTION IS 0.5 UG/L (NICHOLSON AA ET AL; ANAL CHEM 49: 814-9 (1977)).
[IARC. Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Man. Geneva: World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1972-PRESENT. (Multivolume work).V20 498 (1979)]**PEER REVIEWED**

TETRACHLOROETHYLENE WAS DETERMINED IN WASTE-CONTAMINATED SOIL AND CHEMICAL STILL BOTTOM EXTRACTS BY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY.
[GURKA DF, BETOWSKI LD; ANAL CHEM 54: 1819 (1982)]**PEER REVIEWED**

DETERMINATION OF TETRACHLOROETHYLENE IN FISH BY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY; DETECTION LIMITS IN 0.1-1.0 PPB RANGE.
[OFSTAD EB ET AL; THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 20: 205-16 (1981)]**PEER REVIEWED**

NIOSH Method 1003. Analyte: Tetrachloroethylene; Matrix: air; Procedure: Gas chromatography, flame ionization detector; Desorption: 1 ml CS2, stand 30 min; Range: 0.4 to 12 mg/sample; Precision: 0.052; Est LOD: 0.01 mg/sample; Interferences: none
[U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods. 4th ed. Methods A-Z & Supplements. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, Aug 1994.]**PEER REVIEWED**

EPA Method 8010: Halogenated Volatile Organics. For the analysis of solid waste ... Under the prescribed conditions, tetrachloroethylene has a detection limit of 0.03 ug/l, an average recovery range of four measurements of 8.1-29.6 ug/l, and a limit for the standard deviation of 5.4 ug/l.
[USEPA/Office of Solid Waste (OSW); Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods SW846 Methods (1986)]**PEER REVIEWED**

EPA Method 8240B: Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry for Volatile Organics Method 8240 can be used to quantify most volatile organic commpounds that have boiling points below 200 deg C and that are insoluble or slightly soluble in water, including the title compound. ... Under the prescribed conditions, tetrachloroethylene has an average recovery range for four samples of 17.0-26.6 ug/l with a limit for the standard deviation of 5.0 ug/l and a retention time of 22.2 min.
[USEPA/Office of Solid Waste (OSW); Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods SW846 Methods (1986)]**PEER REVIEWED**

EPA Method 601 A purge and trap gas chromatography method for the analysis of tetrachloroethylene in municipal and industrial discharges, consists of a stainless steel column, 8 ft x 0.1 in ID, packed with Carbopack B (60/80 mesh) coated with SP-1000, with electrolytic conductivity detection, and helium as the carrier gas at a flow rate of 40 ml/min. A sample injection volume of 2 to 5 ul is suggested, the column temperature is held isothermal at 45 deg C for 3 minutes then programmed at 8 deg/min to final temperature of 220 deg C. This method has a detection limit of 0.03 ug/l and an overall precision of 0.18 times the average recovery +2.21, over a working range of 8.0 to 500 ug/l.
[40 CFR 136 (7/1/87)]**PEER REVIEWED**

EPA Method 624: A purge and trap gas chromatography/mass spectrometry method for the analysis of tetrachloroethylene in municipal and industrial discharges, consists of a glass column, 6 ft x 0.1 in, packed with Carbopack B (60/80 mesh) coated with 1% SP-1000, with the detection performed by the mass spectrometer, and helium as the carrier gas at a flow rate of 30 ml/min. A sample injection volume of 2 to 5 ul is suggested, the column temperature is held isothermal at 45 deg C for 3 minutes and then programmed at 8 deg/min to a final temperature of 220 deg C. This method has a detection limit of 4.1 ug/l and an overall precision of 0.16 times the average recovery - 0.45, over a working range of 5 to 600 ug/l.
[40 CFR 136 (7/1/87)]**PEER REVIEWED**

EPA Method 1624: An isotope dilution gas chromatography/ mass spectrometry method for the determination of volatile organic compounds in municipal and industrial discharges is described. This method is designed to meet the survey requirements of Effluent Guidelines Division (EGD) and the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). Under the prescribed conditions, unlabeled tetrachloroethylene has a minimum level of 10 ug/l and a mean retention time of 1528 sec. The labeled compound has a characteristic primary m/z of 166/172. This method has an initial precision of 6.6 ug/l, an accuracy of 15.1-28.5 ug/l, and a labeled compound recovery of 31-181%.
[40 CFR 136 (7/1/87)]**PEER REVIEWED**

AOB Method VA-005-1. Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Ambient Air by Purge and Trap Gas Chromatography. No detection limit.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC# 4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

AOB Method VA-006-1. Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Ambient Air by Direct Portable GC/PID. No detection limit.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC# 4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

AOB Method VA-008-1. Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Ambient Air by Portable GC/PID with Direct Sampling via Pump and Sample Loop. No detection limit.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC# 4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

APHA Method 6210-D. Volatile Organics in Water by Gas Chromatographic/ Mass Spectrometric Purge and Trap Capillary-Column Technique. No detection limit
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC# 4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

APHA Method 6220-C. Volatile Aromatic Organics in Water by Purge and Trap Gas Chromatography. Detection limit = 0.05 ug/l.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC# 4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

APHA Method 6230-C. Volatile Aromatic Organics in Water by Purge and Trap Gas Chromatography. Detection limit = 0.03 ug/l.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC# 4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

AOB Method VS-001-1. Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Soil by Purge and Trap GC/PID/ELCD. Detection limit = 10 ug/kg.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC# 4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

AOB Method VS-001-1. Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Soil and Sediment by Automated Headspace GC/PID/ELCD. Detection limit = 100 ug/kg.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC# 4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Sampling Procedures:

Volatile organic compounds pose a challenge to ground-water sampling protocols, since they can be lost as a water sample degasses or lost due to sorption on tubing or pump materials. Laboratory sorption experiments were conducted with 5 common flexible tubing materials to determine the impact of sorptive bias for chloroform, trichloroethylene, trichloroethane and tetrachloroethylene. Tubes made of Teflon, polyethylene, polypropylene, polyvinyl chloride and silicone rubber were all found to sorb the test compounds in short exposure periods. Virgin tubing materials introduce substantial amounts of leachable organic matter in similar exposures. Tubing made of Teflon showed the least absorption and leaching problems and should be the tubing material of choice for detailed organic sampling purposes. Absorption into the polymer matrix is the likely mechanism for the errors.
[Barcelona MJ et al; Anal Chem 27 (2): 460-4 (1985)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Analyte: Tetrachloroethylene; Matrix: Air; Sampler: Solid sorbent tube (coconut shell charcoal, 100 mg/50 mg); Flow rate: 0.01-0.2 l/min; Vol: min: 0.2 @ 100 ppm, max: 40; Stability: not determined
[U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods. 4th ed. Methods A-Z & Supplements. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, Aug 1994.V2 1003-1]**PEER REVIEWED**

Special References:

Special Reports:

IKEDA M; IGAKU NO AYUMI 102 (6-7): 453-9 (1977). REVIEW OF INDUCTION OF LIVER ANGIOSARCOMA, HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA, NEPHROBLASTOMA, PULMONARY TUMOR, KIDNEY ADENOCARCINOMA, & MAMMARY CARCINOMA BY CHLORINATED ETHYLENES IN RATS & MICE INCL CORRELATION OF EFFECTS TO DOSE, AGE & SEX.

UTZINGER R, SCHLATTER C; CHEMOSPHERE 6 (9): 517-24 (1977). A REVIEW ON THE TOXICITY OF TRACE AMT OF TETRACHLOROETHYLENE IN WATER WITH EMPHASIS ON MUTAGENICITY, CARCINOGENICITY & MIXED FUNCTION OXIDASE.

HAKE CL, STEWART RD; ENVIRON HEALTH PERSPECT 21: 231-8 (1977). REVIEW OF ACCIDENTAL & CONTROLLED EXPOSURE OF HUMANS TO TETRACHLOROETHYLENE.

WALTER P ET AL; CHLORINATED HYDROCARBON TOXICITY (1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE, TRICHLOROETHYLENE, & TETRACHLOROETHYLENE): A MONOGRAPH. US NTIS, PB REP; ISS PB-257185, 178 PP (1976). REVIEW WITH 91 REFERENCES. RESULTS OF A STUDY OF THE 1920-1975 LITERATURE ON TOXICITY OF TETRACHLOROETHYLENE.

DHHS/ATSDR; Toxicological Profile for Tetrachloroethylene (Update) TP-92/18 (1993)

NIOSH Current Intelligence Bulletin No 20 for Tetrachloroethylene (1978)

WHO; Environmental Health Criteria for Tetrachloroethylene No 31 (1984)

USEPA Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Tetrachloroethylene (1980) EPA 440/5-80-073

SRI; Assessment of Human Exposures to Atmospheric Perchloroethylene Contract No 68-02-2835 (1979)

USEPA; Health Effects Assessment for Tetrachloroethylene EPA/540/1-86/009 (1984)

USEPA; Health Advisories for 25 Organics: Tetrachloroethylene (1987) PB 87-235578

DHEW/NCI; Bioassay of Tetrachloroethylene for Possible Carcinogenicity (1977) Technical Rpt Series No. 13 DHEW Pub No. (NIH) 77-813

DHHS/NTP; Toxicology & Carcinogenesis Studies of Tetrachloroethylene in F344/N Rats and B6C3F1 Mice (Inhalation Studies) Technical Report Series No. 311 (1986) NIH Publication No. 86-2567

U.S. Department of Health & Human Services/National Toxicology Program; Tenth Report on Carcinogens. National Institutes of Environmental Health Sciences. The Report on Carcinogens is an informational scientific and public health document that identifies and discusses substances (including agents, mixtures, or exposure circumstances) that may pose a carcinogenic hazard to human health. Tetrachloroethylene (127-18-4) was first listed in the Fifth Annual Report on Carcinogens (1989) as reasonably anticipated to be a human carcinogen.
[ ]

Synonyms and Identifiers:

Synonyms:

AI3-01860
**PEER REVIEWED**

Ankilostin
**PEER REVIEWED**

Antisal 1
**PEER REVIEWED**

Antisol 1
**PEER REVIEWED**

Caswell no 827
**PEER REVIEWED**

CZTEROCHLOROETYLEN (POLISH)
**PEER REVIEWED**

Didakene
**PEER REVIEWED**

Dow-Per
**PEER REVIEWED**

ENT 1,860
**PEER REVIEWED**

EPA pesticide chemical code 078501
**PEER REVIEWED**

ETHENE, TETRACHLORO-
**PEER REVIEWED**

ETHYLENE TETRACHLORIDE
**PEER REVIEWED**

Ethylene, tetrachloro-
**PEER REVIEWED**

Fedal-Un
**PEER REVIEWED**

NCI-C04580
**PEER REVIEWED**

Nema
**PEER REVIEWED**

PCE
**PEER REVIEWED**

Per
**PEER REVIEWED**

Perawin
**PEER REVIEWED**

Perc
**PEER REVIEWED**

PERCHLOORETHYLEEN, PER (DUTCH)
**PEER REVIEWED**

Perchlor
**PEER REVIEWED**

PERCHLORAETHYLEN, PER (GERMAN)
**PEER REVIEWED**

PERCHLORETHYLENE
**PEER REVIEWED**

PERCHLORETHYLENE, PER (FRENCH)
**PEER REVIEWED**

PERCHLOROETHYLENE
**PEER REVIEWED**

Perclene
**PEER REVIEWED**

PERCLOROETILENE (ITALIAN)
**PEER REVIEWED**

Percosolv
**PEER REVIEWED**

Perk
**PEER REVIEWED**

Perklone
**PEER REVIEWED**

Persec
**PEER REVIEWED**

Tetlen
**PEER REVIEWED**

Tetracap
**PEER REVIEWED**

TETRACHLOORETHEEN (DUTCH)
**PEER REVIEWED**

TETRACHLORAETHEN (GERMAN)
**PEER REVIEWED**

TETRACHLORETHYLENE
**PEER REVIEWED**

TETRACHLOROETHENE
**PEER REVIEWED**

1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
**PEER REVIEWED**

TETRACLOROETENE (ITALIAN)
**PEER REVIEWED**

Tetraguer
**PEER REVIEWED**

Tetraleno
**PEER REVIEWED**

Tetralex
**PEER REVIEWED**

Tetravec
**PEER REVIEWED**

Tetroguer
**PEER REVIEWED**

Tetropil
**PEER REVIEWED**

Formulations/Preparations:

Available in the United States ... in veterinary preparations (eg, Nema Worm Capsules (Parke-Davis)). These capsules contain pure tetrachloroethylene. Avail sizes are 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, 2.5 & 5 ml.
[American Medical Association, Department of Drugs. Drug Evaluations. 6th ed. Chicago, Ill: American Medical Association, 1986.1612]**PEER REVIEWED**

Tetrachloroethylene is avail in the USA in the following grades: purified, technical, USP, spectrophotometric, & dry-cleaning. The technical & dry-cleaning grades both meet specifications for technical grade & differ only in the amount of stabilizer added to prevent decomposition. Stabilizers ... incl amines or mixtures of epoxides & esters. Typical analysis of the commercial grade is ... nonvolatile residue, 0.0003%; free chlorine, none; moisture, no cloud at -5 deg C ... USP grade contains not less than 99.0% & no more than 99.5% tetrachloroethylene, the remainder consisting of ethanol. ...
[IARC. Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Man. Geneva: World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1972-PRESENT. (Multivolume work).V20 492 (1979)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Food Grade
[Kuney, J.H. and J.N. Nullican (eds.) Chemcyclopedia. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society, 1988.116]**PEER REVIEWED**

/Tetrachloroethylene (BP) may/ ... contain thymol 0.01% wt/wt as a preservative.
[Reynolds, J.E.F., Prasad, A.B. (eds.) Martindale-The Extra Pharmacopoeia. 28th ed. London: The Pharmaceutical Press, 1982.106]**PEER REVIEWED**

Tetrachloroethylene Capsules (USP, BP, 1973)
[Reynolds, J.E.F., Prasad, A.B. (eds.) Martindale-The Extra Pharmacopoeia. 28th ed. London: The Pharmaceutical Press, 1982.107]**PEER REVIEWED**

Tetrachloroethylene Draught (BNF, 1966): tetrachloroethylene 2.5 ml, acacia 2 g, peppermint emulsion 0.3 ml, chloroform water to 50 ml.
[Reynolds, J.E.F., Prasad, A.B. (eds.) Martindale-The Extra Pharmacopoeia. 28th ed. London: The Pharmaceutical Press, 1982.107]**PEER REVIEWED**

Perklone (ICI Mond, UK): a brand of tetrachloroethylene for dry-cleaning purposes.
[Reynolds, J.E.F., Prasad, A.B. (eds.) Martindale-The Extra Pharmacopoeia. 28th ed. London: The Pharmaceutical Press, 1982.107]**PEER REVIEWED**

Shipping Name/ Number DOT/UN/NA/IMO:

UN 1897; Tetrachloroethylene; Perchloroethylene

IMO 6.1; Tetrachloroethylene

Standard Transportation Number:

49 403 55; Tetrachloroethylene

EPA Hazardous Waste Number:

U210; A toxic waste when a discarded commercial chemical product or manufacturing chemical intermediate or an off-specification commercial chemical product or a manufacturing chemical intermediate.

F002; A hazardous waste from nonspecific sources when a spent halogenated solvent.

Administrative Information:

Hazardous Substances Databank Number: 124
Last Revision Date: 20030829
Last Review Date: Reviewed by SRP on 1/20/2001

Update History:

Complete Update on 2003-08-29, 1 fields added/edited/deleted
Complete Update on 02/14/2003, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 11/08/2002, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 10/16/2002, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 05/31/2002, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 05/13/2002, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 02/13/2002, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 01/14/2002, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 08/09/2001, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 05/23/2001, 85 fields added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 02/22/2000, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 02/11/2000, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 02/08/2000, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 02/02/2000, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 11/18/1999, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 09/21/1999, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 08/26/1999, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 07/20/1999, 3 fields added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 05/18/1999, 7 fields added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 05/04/1999, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 03/29/1999, 2 fields added/edited/deleted.
Field Update on 03/19/1999, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 02/24/1999, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 02/01/1999, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 01/20/1999, 3 fields added/edited/deleted.
Field Update on 12/18/1998, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 11/12/1998, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 09/11/1998, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 06/02/1998, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 02/25/1998, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 10/17/1997, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 05/08/1997, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 03/27/1997, 2 fields added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 03/11/1997, 3 fields added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 02/24/1997, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 01/09/1997, 2 fields added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 09/12/1996, 2 fields added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 09/11/1996, 2 fields added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 06/06/1996, 2 fields added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 05/10/1996, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 04/09/1996, 8 fields added/edited/deleted.
Field Update on 01/18/1996, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 09/26/1995, 2 fields added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 06/09/1995, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 02/13/1995, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 01/23/1995, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 12/19/1994, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 08/02/1994, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 06/28/1994, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 05/05/1994, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 03/25/1994, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 01/17/1994, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 11/05/1993, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 09/15/1993, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 08/07/1993, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 08/04/1993, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 04/28/1993, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Field update on 12/11/1992, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 12/03/1992, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 04/27/1992, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 04/01/1992, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 03/11/1992, 4 fields added/edited/deleted.
Field Update on 01/13/1992, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Field Update on 09/27/1991, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 10/23/1990, 8 fields added/edited/deleted.
Field Update on 08/23/1990, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Field Update on 05/14/1990, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Field Update on 05/04/1990, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Field Update on 02/02/1990, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Field Update on 01/15/1990, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 01/11/1990, 5 fields added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 07/28/1989, 108 fields added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 09/03/1987
Created 19830315 by DS

GLCC RELATED TOXIC SUBSTANCES FOUND IN THE CAMP POND AND CAMP WATER WELL 2003 AND 2004

GREAT LAKES CHEMICAL CORPORATION AND THE PATHFINDERS CAMP