INFORMATION REGARDING CHLOROFORM AND SOLVENT

http://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/cgi-bin/sis/search/f?./temp/~DngQZP:1
CHLOROFORM
CASRN: 67-66-3

Major Uses :

As a solvent for fats, oils, rubber, alkaloids, waxes, gutta-percha, resins; as cleansing agent; in fire extinguishers to lower the freezing temp of carbon tetrachloride; in the rubber industry.
[Budavari, S. (ed.). The Merck Index - An Encyclopedia of Chemicals, Drugs, and Biologicals. Whitehouse Station, NJ: Merck and Co., Inc., 1996.357]**PEER REVIEWED**

Major Uses :

EXTRACTION & PURIFICATION SOLVENT - EG, FOR PENICILLIN
[SRI]**PEER REVIEWED**

Major Uses :

As a solvent for coating compositions of urea or melamine resins and for preparations of lubricant additives and plasticizers; surface-active agents; lubricant additives, rubber chemicals, flotation agents, antifoam agent; flavoring agent; reaction medium for hydrogen pyroxide production; defoamer.
[Prager, J.C. Environmental Contaminant Reference Databook Volume 2. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1996.453]**PEER REVIEWED**

Consumption Patterns :

Hydrochlorofluorocarbon 22 (HCFC-22), 98% (refrigerants 70%; fluoropolymers 30%); miscellaneous, including laboratory reagents and extraction solvents for pharmaceuticals, 2%.
[Chemical Marketing Reporter; Chemical Profile Chloroform. December 1, 1997. p. 61 NY, NY: Schnell Pub Co (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Hazardous Reactivities & Incompatibilities :

Chloroform and acetone interact vigorously & exothermally in presence of solid potassium hydroxide or calcium hydroxide to form 1,1,1-trichloro-2-hydroxy-2-methylpropane. A laboratory incident involving the bursting of a solvent residues bottle was attributed to this reaction.
[Bretherick, L. Handbook of Reactive Chemical Hazards. 4th ed. Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd., 1990132]**PEER REVIEWED**

Preventive Measures :

PRECAUTIONS FOR "CARCINOGENS": Smoking, drinking, eating, storage of food or of food & beverage containers or utensils, & the application of cosmetics should be prohibited in any laboratory. All personnel should remove gloves, if worn, after completion of procedures in which carcinogens have been used. They should ... wash ... hands, preferably using dispensers of liq detergent, & rinse ... thoroughly. Consideration should be given to appropriate methods for cleaning the skin, depending on nature of the contaminant. No standard procedure can be recommended, but the use of organic solvents should be avoided. Safety pipettes should be used for all pipetting. /Chemical Carcinogens/
[Montesano, R., H. Bartsch, E.Boyland, G. Della Porta, L. Fishbein, R. A. Griesemer, A.B. Swan, L. Tomatis, and W. Davis (eds.). Handling Chemical Carcinogens in the Laboratory: Problems of Safety. IARC Scientific Publications No. 33. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1979.8]**PEER REVIEWED**

Cleanup Methods :

PRECAUTIONS FOR "CARCINOGENS": A high-efficiency particulate arrestor (HEPA) or charcoal filters can be used to minimize amt of carcinogen in exhausted air ventilated safety cabinets, lab hoods, glove boxes or animal rooms ... Filter housing that is designed so that used filters can be transferred into plastic bag without contaminating maintenance staff is avail commercially. Filters should be placed in plastic bags immediately after removal. ... The plastic bag should be sealed immediately. ... The sealed bag should be labelled properly ... Waste liquids ... should be placed or collected in proper containers for disposal. The lid should be secured & the bottles properly labelled. Once filled, bottles should be placed in plastic bag, so that outer surface ... is not contaminated. ... The plastic bag should also be sealed & labelled. ... Broken glassware ... should be decontaminated by solvent extraction, by chemical destruction, or in specially designed incinerators. /Chemical Carcinogens/
[Montesano, R., H. Bartsch, E.Boyland, G. Della Porta, L. Fishbein, R. A. Griesemer, A.B. Swan, L. Tomatis, and W. Davis (eds.). Handling Chemical Carcinogens in the Laboratory: Problems of Safety. IARC Scientific Publications No. 33. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1979.15]**PEER REVIEWED**

Disposal Methods :

PRECAUTIONS FOR "CARCINOGENS": ... Incineration may be only feasible method for disposal of contaminated laboratory waste from biological expt. However, not all incinerators are suitable for this purpose. The most efficient type ... is probably the gas-fired type, in which a first-stage combustion with a less than stoichiometric air:fuel ratio is followed by a second stage with excess air. Some ... are designed to accept ... aqueous & organic-solvent solutions, otherwise it is necessary ... to absorb soln onto suitable combustible material, such as sawdust. Alternatively, chem destruction may be used, esp when small quantities ... are to be destroyed in laboratory. /Chemical Carcinogens/
[Montesano, R., H. Bartsch, E.Boyland, G. Della Porta, L. Fishbein, R. A. Griesemer, A.B. Swan, L. Tomatis, and W. Davis (eds.). Handling Chemical Carcinogens in the Laboratory: Problems of Safety. IARC Scientific Publications No. 33. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1979.15]**PEER REVIEWED**

Disposal Methods :

PRECAUTIONS FOR "CARCINOGENS": Carcinogens that are alkylating, arylating or acylating agents per se can be destroyed by reaction with appropriate nucleophiles, such as water, hydroxyl ions, ammonia, thiols & thiosulfate. The reactivity of various alkylating agents varies greatly ... & is also influenced by sol of agent in the reaction medium. To facilitate the complete reaction, it is suggested that the agents be dissolved in ethanol or similar solvents. ... No method should be applied ... until it has been thoroughly tested for its effectiveness & safety on material to be inactivated. For example, in case of destruction of alkylating agents, it is possible to detect residual compounds by reaction with 4(4-nitrobenzyl)-pyridine. /Chemical Carcinogens/
[Montesano, R., H. Bartsch, E.Boyland, G. Della Porta, L. Fishbein, R. A. Griesemer, A.B. Swan, L. Tomatis, and W. Davis (eds.). Handling Chemical Carcinogens in the Laboratory: Problems of Safety. IARC Scientific Publications No. 33. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1979.17]**PEER REVIEWED**

Metabolism/Metabolites :

Studies were made with male Wistar rats on the effects of 50% food restriction on the metabolism of ... chloroform. ... The activities of liver drug-metabolizing enzymes for this solvent was enhanced almost equally without exception by one-day food restriction, although the restriction produced no significant increase in the microsomal protein and cytochrome p450 contents. Thus, food restriction enhances metabolism of chloroform in the liver.
[Koyama Y, Sato A; Jpn J Ind Health 28 (2): 96-100 (1986)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Therapeutic Uses :

MEDICATION (VET): USED/ EXTERNALLY, AS LINIMENT-TYPE COUNTERIRRITANT FOR RELIEF OF DEEP SEATED PAIN, TO EXPEL SCREWWORM LARVAE FROM WOUNDS, AS SKIN CLEANSER (FAT SOLVENT), & AS SKIN COOLANT & LOCAL ANESTHETIC DUE TO ITS EVAPORATION. ... INTERNALLY, IT IS GIVEN IN VARIOUS MIXT WELL DIL TO AVOID GASTRIC IRRITATION ... . /FORMER USE/
[Rossoff, I.S. Handbook of Veterinary Drugs. New York: Springer Publishing Company, 1974.104]**PEER REVIEWED**

Artificial Pollution Sources :

Emissions from its production and indirect production (in the manufacture of ethylene dichloride); chlorination of drinking water, municipal sewage, cooling water in electric power generating plants; produced during the atmospheric photodegradation of trichloroethylenes; auto exhaust; from its use as an extractant or solvent, chemical intermediate, dry cleaning agent, fumigant ingredient, in fluorocarbon 22 production, synthetic rubber production (1-2).
[(1) USEPA; Health Assessment Document for Chloroform. External Review Draft USEPA-600/8-84-004A p. 3-4 to 3-28 (1984) (2) IARC; Some Halogenated Hydrocarbons 20: 402-5 (1979)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Food Survey Values :

A pilot study was conducted in 1980 to measure chloroform in five "Market Basket" food samples collected from grocery stores in New Jersey, North Carolina, and Washington, D.C.(1). Chloroform concns in cola soft drinks avgd 49 ug/l while in non-cola soft drinks 11 ug/l(1). A typical chloroform level in soft drinks is about 23 ug/l(1). One of the five dairy composites also contained chloroform: milk and cheese avgd 4 ng/g and one butter samples contained 12 ng/g(1). Ice cream and mayonnaise also contained chloroform at 12 and 23 ng/g, respectively(1). Another FDA study of VOCs in margarines detected chloroform in 5 of 18 samples collected at stores and in 13 of 19 finished products collected at manufacturing plants(1). The levels were much higher at the manufacturing plants than in the stores, with two samples between 100 and 150 ng/g and ten others between 15 and 50 ng/g. It was later determined that VOCs migrated from the packaging glues into the margarine(1). In a study of 18 table-ready food items, ten contained chloroform with the highest levels occuring in butter 670 ng/g, Cheddar cheese 80 ng/g, granola 57 ng/g, and peanut butter 29 ng/g(1). Mean values of 14 samples of butter was 364 ng/g; 8 samples of cheese 182 ng/g; 11 samples of cereal 60 ng/g; 7 samples of peanut butter 51.3 ng/g; and 12 samples of highly processed foods 122 ng/g(1). The sources of chloroform in food are not clearly understood however migration of chloroform from packaging solvents, glues, and inks has been documented(1).
[(1) Wallace LA; Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 27: 113-94 (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Probable Routes of Human Exposure :

Shell Chem Co, Rocky Mountain Arsenal - mean TWA were 2.6, 0.4 and 0.2 ppm for production operaters, drummers/bottle fillers and maintenance/utility personnel (pesticide plant)(1). Polish pharmaceutical plant 2 - 205 ppm(1); police forensic lab - 8 hr TWA - 15.8 ppm (range 2.6-46.4 ppm)(1); film manufacturing plant using a solvent containing 22% chloroform 1968-72 - 7-170 ppm (mean 47 ppm, 79 samples)(1).
[(1) Santodonato J et al; Monograph on Human Exposure to Chemicals in the Workplace: Chloroform. NCI contract N01-CP-26002-03, Syracuse Research Corp. July (1985)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Analytic Laboratory Methods :

EPA Method EMSLC 551. Determination of Chlorination Disinfection Byproducts and Chlorinated Solvents in Drinking Water by Liquid-Liquid Extraction and Gas Chromatography with Electron-Capture Detection.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC# 4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

TSCA Test Submissions :

Chloroform (CAS # 67-66-3) was evaluated for clastogenicity in Chinese Hamsters (5/sex/treatment group) exposed by oral gavage to doses of 0 (solvent control), 40, 120, and 400 mg/kg bw with subsequent harvest, preparation and analysis of metaphase bone marrow cells (100 cells/animal) at 6 (high dose), 24 (all doses), and 48 (high dose) hours post-treatment. Hamsters of 400 mg/kg doses exhibited signs of toxicity including hypoactivity, closed eyes, and arrested food consumption. Slight enhancement of chromosomal aberrations was statistically significant (Mann-Whitney-U-test) 6 and 24 hours after doses of 400 mg/kg, although the rate was still within the range of historical negative controls. Further, outside the range of historical controls, no dose-response relationship was demonstrated. The study authors noted an inference of chloroform mutagenicity, however, based on the nature of marked damage (multiple aberrations, chromosomal disintegration, and exchanges) associated with oral chloroform at doses of 120 and 400 mg/kg (6-, 24-, and 48-hour assessments). In repeat study, exposing groups of hamsters to doses of 0 (solvent control), 120, and 400 mg/kg bw, 24-hour cytogenetic assay again revealed a slight but statistically significant increase in chromosome aberrations in association with 400 mg/kg doses, failing again to demonstrate a dose-response relationship for rates of damage (chromosome breaks) beyond the range of historical controls. Distinctly heavy damage (multiple aberrations and exchanges) characterized the chloroform-induced aberrations at 400 mg/kg in 6/6000 metaphase bone marrow cells.
[Dow Chem Co; Chloroform - Chromosome Aberrations in Chinese Hamster Bone Marrow Cells; 03/09/88; EPA Document No. 88-920005773; Fiche No. OTS0544556]**QC REVIEWED**

TSCA Test Submissions :

The rate of chloroform (CAS # 67-66-3, CHCl3) metabolism was evaluated in 6-hour in vitro bioassay with microsomal fractions of liver and kidney from B6C3F1 mice, F344 rats, Syrian Golden hamsters, and humans. Microsomal protein preparations of each species were incubated for 30 minutes with labeled 14CHCl3 in dimethyl formamide, a NADPH regenerating system and a potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). Boiled enzyme preparations containing equivalent amounts of protein served as controls. The reaction terminated at 30 minutes, CO2 generated by the enzymatic reaction was measured and the solution's unreacted substrate (14CHCl3) and water-soluble reaction products separated by solvent extraction (unlabeled CHCl3). Liquid scintillation assay in combined species analysis (mice, rats, hamsters, and humans) documented a rate of 14CHCl3 biotransformation to water-soluble metabolite proportional to time for 10-30 min and proportional to protein concentration up to 1-2 mg protein per incubation. This reaction was wholly inhibited by boiling the enzyme prior to incubation. Reaction rates or MFO (mixed function oxidase) activities (nmoles oxidized/min/mg protein at 0.049-0.058 mM CHCl3) in liver microsomes of mouse, rat, and hamster ranged from 0.0199 (rat) to 0.133 (hamster) nmoles/min/mg protein. Human liver microsomes demonstrated a broad activity range from 0.003 - 0.017 nmoles/min/mg protein (mean +/- s.d. = 0.00816 +/- 0.00448), the slowest rates among tested mammals. Descending rates of CHCl3 metabolism in the kidney were found in mice (0.0102 nmoles/min/mg protein), hamsters (0.00562 nmoles/min/mg protein), and rats (0.000928 nmoles/min/mg protein). Human kidney samples were limited and failed to demonstrate microsomal rates of CHCl3 metabolism above the minimal detection limit (0.0003 nmoles/min/mg protein at 0.06 mM CHCl3). Species-specific metabolic indices were subsequently derived by computer optimization of kinetics study data associated with 1-20 mM 14CHCl3 for development of a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PB-PK) model of chloroform toxicity.
[Dow Chem Co; Chloroform - A Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Model Including Cytotoxicity as an Endpoint, Part A - Development of the PB-PK Model (Final Report); EPA Document No. 86-890000091; Fiche No. OTS0516654]**QC REVIEWED**

GLCC RELATED TOXIC SUBSTANCES FOUND IN THE CAMP POND AND CAMP WATER WELL 2003 AND 2004

GREAT LAKES CHEMICAL CORPORATION AND THE PATHFINDERS CAMP