ETHYLBENZENE

ETHYLBENZENE
CASRN: 100-41-4

Human Health Effects:

Toxicity Summary:

The acute toxicity of ethylbenzene to algae, aquatic invertebrates and fish is moderate. ... No information is available regarding chronic exposure of aquatic organisms to ethylbenzene. There is limited information regarding the toxicity of ethylbenzene to bacteria ... There are no data for terrestrial plants, birds, or wild mammals. Human exposure to ethylbenzene occurs mainly by inhalation; 40-60% of inhaled ethylbenzene is retained in the lung. Ethylbenzene is extensively metabolized, mainly to mandelic and phenylglyoxylic acids. These urinary metabolites can be used to monitor human exposures. Ethylbenzene has low acute and chronic toxicity for both animals and humans. It is toxic to the central nervous system and is an irritant of mucous membranes and the eyes. ... Ethylbenzene is an inducer of liver microsomal enzymes. It is not mutagenic or teratogenic ... No information is available on reproductive toxicity or carcinogenicity of ethylbenzene. A guidance value of 22 mg/ cu m (5 ppm) has been calculated from animal studies. /This value would correspond to a weekly absorbed dose (daily ventilation of 20 cu m with 60% retention) of about 2000 mg./ The estimated exposure of the general population (even in the worst case situation) is below this guidance value. Long term occupational exposure to ethylbenzene concentrations estimated to be of this order of magnitude did not cause adverse health effects in workers.
[Environmental Health Criteria 186: Ethylbenzene pp. 19-20 (1996) by the International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS) under the joint sponsorship of the United Nations Environment Programme, the International Labour Organisation and the World Health Organization.]**QC REVIEWED**

Evidence for Carcinogenicity:

CLASSIFICATION: D; not classifiable as to human carcinogenicity. BASIS FOR CLASSIFICATION: nonclassifiable due to lack of animal bioassays and human studies. HUMAN CARCINOGENICITY DATA: None. ANIMAL CARCINOGENICITY DATA: None.
[U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) on Ethylbenzene (100-41-4) Available from: http://www.epa.gov/ngispgm3/iris on the Substance File List as of March 15, 2000]**PEER REVIEWED**

A3; Confirmed animal carcinogen with unknown relevance to humans.
[American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. TLVs & BEIs: Threshold limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices for 2002. Cincinnati, OH. 2002.31]**QC REVIEWED**

Human Toxicity Excerpts:

PROLONGED EXPOSURE TO ... VAPORS MAY RESULT IN FUNCTIONAL DISORDERS, INCREASE IN DEEP REFLEXES, IRRITATION OF UPPER RESPIRATORY TRACT, HEMATOLOGICAL DISORDERS (LEUKOPENIA AND LYMPHOCYTOSIS, IN PARTICULAR) AND ... HEPATOBILIARY COMPLAINTS.
[International Labour Office. Encyclopedia of Occupational Health and Safety. Vols. I&II. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Office, 1983.2114]**PEER REVIEWED**

... ASPIRATION OF EVEN A SMALL AMT OF ETHYLBENZENE MAY CAUSE SEVERE INJURY, SINCE ITS LOW VISCOSITY AND SURFACE TENSION WILL CAUSE IT TO SPREAD OVER A LARGE SURFACE OF PULMONARY TISSUE. ...
[Browning, E. Toxicity and Metabolism of Industrial Solvents. New York: American Elsevier, 1965.92]**PEER REVIEWED**

Produces an irritant effect from chronic inhalation at 100 ppm (0.492 mg/L)/8 hr. /From table/
[Clayton, G.D., F.E. Clayton (eds.) Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology. Volumes 2A, 2B, 2C, 2D, 2E, 2F: Toxicology. 4th ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1993-1994.1344]**PEER REVIEWED**

... /IT HAS BEEN/ SHOWN THAT CONCN OF 1 MG/L & EVEN 0.1 MG/L MAY BE DANGEROUS & MAY PRODUCE FUNCTIONAL & ORGANIC DISTURBANCES (NERVOUS SYSTEM DISORDERS, TOXIC HEPATITIS & UPPER RESP TRACT COMPLAINTS). CONCN AS LOW AS 0.01 MG/L MAY LEAD TO ... INFLAMMATION OF UPPER RESP TRACT MUCOSA.
[International Labour Office. Encyclopedia of Occupational Health and Safety. Vols. I&II. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Office, 1983.2114]**PEER REVIEWED**

Ethyl benzene vapor has a transient irritant effect on human eyes at 200 ppm in air. At 1000 ppm on the first exposure it is very irritating and causes tearing, but tolerance rapidly develops. At 2000 ppm eye irritation and lacrimation are immediate and severe; 5000 ppm causes intolerable irritation of the eyes and nose.
[Grant, W.M. Toxicology of the Eye. 3rd ed. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas Publisher, 1986.413]**PEER REVIEWED**

ETHYLBENZENE IS MORE VOLATILE THAN STYRENE AND ITS MANUFACTURE IS ACCOMPANIED BY A GREATER HAZARD OF ACUTE POISONING. ...
[International Labour Office. Encyclopedia of Occupational Health and Safety. Vols. I&II. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Office, 1983.2114]**PEER REVIEWED**

Skin, Eye and Respiratory Irritations:

... CHARACTERIZED ... AS MOST SEVERE IRRITANT OF THE BENZENE SERIES.
[American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices. 5th ed. Cincinnati, OH: American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 1986.244]**PEER REVIEWED**

A concn of 200 ppm causes eye irritation. A concn of 100 ppm for 8 hr caused irritative effects in a human.
[Cleland, J.G., G.L. Kingsbury. Multimedia Environmental Goals for Environmental Assessment. Volume 1. EPA-600/7-77-136a. Research Triangle Park, NC: EPA, Nov. 1977.E-148]**PEER REVIEWED**

EXPOSURE TO CONCN OF 5000 PPM /24.6 MG/L/ ... CAUSES INTOLERABLE IRRITATION OF EYES, MUCOUS MEMBRANES & NOSE.
[Patty, F. (ed.). Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology: Volume II: Toxicology. 2nd ed. New York: Interscience Publishers, 1963.1232]**PEER REVIEWED**

HAZARD WARNING: ... exposure to 21.5 g/cu m (5000 ppm) ethylbenzene for a few seconds gives intolerable irritation of nose, eyes, and throat.
[Environmental Health Criteria 186: Ethylbenzene pp. 67 (1996) by the International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS) under the joint sponsorship of the United Nations Environment Programme, the International Labour Organisation and the World Health Organization.]**QC REVIEWED**

Medical Surveillance:

... EMPLOYMENT EXAMINATION SHOULD ENSURE THAT PERSONS WITH LIVER, KIDNEY, NERVOUS SYSTEM, BLOOD AND HEMOPOIETIC-ORGAN DISORDERS ARE /PROTECTED FROM EXPOSURE/ ... WOMEN WITH OVULATION AND MENSTRUAL CYCLE DISORDERS SHOULD ALSO BE /PROTECTED/.
[International Labour Office. Encyclopedia of Occupational Health and Safety. Vols. I&II. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Office, 1983.2114]**PEER REVIEWED**

Consider the points of attack (eyes, upper respiratory system, skin, central nervous system) in placement and periodic physical examinations.
[Sittig, M. Handbook of Toxic and Hazardous Chemicals and Carcinogens, 1985. 2nd ed. Park Ridge, NJ: Noyes Data Corporation, 1985.413]**PEER REVIEWED**

Populations at Special Risk:

IN PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED PULMONARY FUNCTION, ESP THOSE WITH OBSTRUCTIVE AIRWAY DISEASES, BREATHING ETHYL BENZENE MIGHT CAUSE EXACERBATION OF SYMPTOMS DUE TO ITS IRRITANT PROPERTIES OR PSYCHIC REFLEX BRONCHOSPASM.
[Mackison, F. W., R. S. Stricoff, and L. J. Partridge, Jr. (eds.). NIOSH/OSHA - Occupational Health Guidelines for Chemical Hazards. DHHS(NIOSH) Publication No. 81-123 (3 VOLS). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, Jan. 1981.]**PEER REVIEWED**

PERSONS WITH ... EXISTING SKIN DISORDERS MAY BE MORE SUSCEPTIBLE TO EFFECTS. ...
[Mackison, F. W., R. S. Stricoff, and L. J. Partridge, Jr. (eds.). NIOSH/OSHA - Occupational Health Guidelines for Chemical Hazards. DHHS(NIOSH) Publication No. 81-123 (3 VOLS). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, Jan. 1981.]**PEER REVIEWED**

... PERSONS WITH LIVER, KIDNEY, NERVOUS SYSTEM, BLOOD AND HEMOPOIETIC-ORGAN DISORDERS. ... WOMEN WITH OVULATION AND MENSTRUAL CYCLE DISORDERS. ...
[International Labour Office. Encyclopedia of Occupational Health and Safety. Vols. I&II. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Office, 1983.2114]**PEER REVIEWED**

Probable Routes of Human Exposure:

NIOSH (NOES Survey 1981-1983) has statistically estimated that 80,726 workers (21,785 of these are female) are potentially exposed to ethylbenzene in the US(1). Occupational exposure to ethylbenzene may occur via inhalation at municipal waste composting facilities where the air concn was found to be 78,000-178,000 ug/cu m(2),and through inhalation and dermal contact with this compound at worplaces where ethylbenzene is produced or used(SRC). The general population may be exposed to ethylbenzene via inhalation of ambient air, ingestion of foods and fish, and drinking contaminated water, and dermal contact with this compound and other products such as gasoline which contains ethylbenzene(SRC).
[(1) NIOSH; National Occupational Exposure Survey (NOES) (1983) (2) Eitzer BD; Environ Sci Technol 29: 896-902 (1995)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Body Burden:

Ethylbenzene was detected, not quantified, in 8 of 8 samples of mother's milk from 4 US urban areas(1). 16.5% of 387 expired air samples taken from 54 normal, healthy, urban volunteers were positive for ethylbenzene concn with an avg of 1.8 ng/l expired air(2). Whole blood samples from 250 subjects ranged in ethylbenzene concns from not detected to 59 ppb, with an avg of 1.0 ppb(3).
[(1) Pellizzari ED et al; Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 28: 322-8 (1982) (2) Krotoszynski BK et al; J Anal Toxicol 3: 225-34 (1979) (3) Antoine SR et al; Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 36: 364-71 (1986)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Average Daily Intake:

AIR INTAKE: (assume air concn of 0.2-2.7 ppb)(2-6); 17-235 ug; WATER INTAKE: (assume water concn of 0-4 ppb(1)) 0-8 ug; FOOD INTAKE: insufficient data(SRC).
[(1) Konasewich D et al; Status Report on Organic and Heavy Metal Contaminants in the Lake Erie, Michigan, Huron and Superior Basins. Great Lakes Quality Review Board (1978) (2) Arnts RR, Meeks SA; Biogenic Hydrocarbon Contribution to the Ambient Air of Selected Areas p. 31 USEPA-600/3-80-023 (1980) (3) Atshuller AP et al; Environ Sci Technol 5: 1009-16 (1981) (4) Lonneman WA et al; Environ Sci Technol 2: 1017-20 (1968) (5) Singh HB et al; Atmos Environ 15: 601-12 (1981) (6) Singh HB et al; Atmospheric Measurements of Selected Toxic Organic Chemicals USEPA-600/3-80-072 (1980)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Animal Toxicity Studies:

Toxicity Summary:

The acute toxicity of ethylbenzene to algae, aquatic invertebrates and fish is moderate. ... No information is available regarding chronic exposure of aquatic organisms to ethylbenzene. There is limited information regarding the toxicity of ethylbenzene to bacteria ... There are no data for terrestrial plants, birds, or wild mammals. Human exposure to ethylbenzene occurs mainly by inhalation; 40-60% of inhaled ethylbenzene is retained in the lung. Ethylbenzene is extensively metabolized, mainly to mandelic and phenylglyoxylic acids. These urinary metabolites can be used to monitor human exposures. Ethylbenzene has low acute and chronic toxicity for both animals and humans. It is toxic to the central nervous system and is an irritant of mucous membranes and the eyes. ... Ethylbenzene is an inducer of liver microsomal enzymes. It is not mutagenic or teratogenic ... No information is available on reproductive toxicity or carcinogenicity of ethylbenzene. A guidance value of 22 mg/ cu m (5 ppm) has been calculated from animal studies. /This value would correspond to a weekly absorbed dose (daily ventilation of 20 cu m with 60% retention) of about 2000 mg./ The estimated exposure of the general population (even in the worst case situation) is below this guidance value. Long term occupational exposure to ethylbenzene concentrations estimated to be of this order of magnitude did not cause adverse health effects in workers.
[Environmental Health Criteria 186: Ethylbenzene pp. 19-20 (1996) by the International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS) under the joint sponsorship of the United Nations Environment Programme, the International Labour Organisation and the World Health Organization.]**QC REVIEWED**

Evidence for Carcinogenicity:

CLASSIFICATION: D; not classifiable as to human carcinogenicity. BASIS FOR CLASSIFICATION: nonclassifiable due to lack of animal bioassays and human studies. HUMAN CARCINOGENICITY DATA: None. ANIMAL CARCINOGENICITY DATA: None.
[U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) on Ethylbenzene (100-41-4) Available from: http://www.epa.gov/ngispgm3/iris on the Substance File List as of March 15, 2000]**PEER REVIEWED**

A3; Confirmed animal carcinogen with unknown relevance to humans.
[American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. TLVs & BEIs: Threshold limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices for 2002. Cincinnati, OH. 2002.31]**QC REVIEWED**

Non-Human Toxicity Excerpts:

... From ingestion of or exposure of skin or lung to high concns causes /CNS depression/ in animals. Although similar to benzene, ethylbenzene apparently does not cause bone marrow problems.
[Friberg, L., Nordberg, G.F., Kessler, E. and Vouk, V.B. (eds). Handbook of the Toxicology of Metals. 2nd ed. Vols I, II.: Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., 1986.288]**PEER REVIEWED**

EXPOSURE OF GUINEA PIGS TO 1% CONCENTRATION HAS BEEN REPORTED AS CAUSING ATAXIA, LOSS OF CONSCIOUSNESS, TREMOR OF THE EXTREMITIES, AND FINALLY DEATH THROUGH RESPIRATORY FAILURE. THE PATHOLOGICAL FINDINGS WERE CONGESTION OF THE BRAIN AND LUNGS WITH EDEMA.
[Lewis, R.J. Sax's Dangerous Properties of Industrial Materials. 9th ed. Volumes 1-3. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1996.1522]**PEER REVIEWED**

... CONCN ... OVER 2 MG/L MAY CAUSE ACUTE POISONING /IN LABORATORY ANIMALS/ ... INITIAL SYMPTOMS ... INCL IRRRTATION OF MUCOUS MEMBRANES ... FOLLOWED BY ... /CNS DEPRESSION/, CRAMPS & DEATH ... DUE TO RESPIRATORY-CENTER PARALYSIS. MAIN PATHOLOGICAL FINDINGS ARE MARKED EDEMA OF BRAIN & LUNG, FOCI OF EPITHELIAL NECROSIS IN RENAL TUBULES & HEPATIC DYSTROPHY.
[International Labour Office. Encyclopedia of Occupational Health and Safety. Vols. I&II. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Office, 1983.2114]**PEER REVIEWED**

... /GUINEA PIGS/ THAT DIED FROM EXPOSURE /TO 10000 PPM FOR FEW MIN OR 5000 PPM FOR 30-60 MIN/ HAD INTENSE CONGESTION AND EDEMA OF LUNG AND GENERALIZED VISCERAL HYPEREMIA.
[Browning, E. Toxicity and Metabolism of Industrial Solvents. New York: American Elsevier, 1965.91]**PEER REVIEWED**

IN GUINEA PIGS, 0.3% BY VOL IS MAX AMT FOR 1 HR WITHOUT SERIOUS SYMPTOMS; 0.1% BY VOL IS MAX AMT FOR SEVERAL HR WITHOUT SERIOUS DISTURBANCES. /FROM TABLE/
[Patty, F. (ed.). Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology: Volume II: Toxicology. 2nd ed. New York: Interscience Publishers, 1963.1232]**PEER REVIEWED**

REPEATED APPLICATIONS OF UNDILUTED ETHYLBENZENE TO THE SKIN OF RABBITS CAUSED ... BLISTERING.
[Browning, E. Toxicity and Metabolism of Industrial Solvents. New York: American Elsevier, 1965.92]**PEER REVIEWED**

... RATS, RABBITS, GUINEA PIGS, AND MONKEYS /WERE EXPOSED/ TO CONCN OF ... 400-2200 PPM, 7 TO 8 HR/DAY, 5 DAYS A WK FOR AS LONG AS 6 MONTHS. THE GUINEA PIGS, RABBITS, AND MONKEYS WERE NOT AFFECTED ... SLIGHT INCREASE IN AVG WT OF KIDNEYS AND LIVERS WERE OBSERVED IN RATS EXPOSED TO 400 PPM FOR 186 DAYS.
[Patty, F. (ed.). Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology: Volume II: Toxicology. 2nd ed. New York: Interscience Publishers, 1963.1232]**PEER REVIEWED**

... RATS /WERE INJECTED/ SUBCUTANEOUSLY WITH 1 ML ... PER KG OF BODY WT DAILY FOR 2 WEEKS AND ... NO DECREASE IN THE TOTAL FEMORAL MARROW NUCLEATED CELL COUNT /WAS OBSERVED/. THESE ANIMALS DEVELOPED A LEUCOCYTOSIS INSTEAD OF SEVERE LEUCOPENIAS FOUND IN BENZENE-DOSED ANIMALS WHICH SERVED AS POSITIVE CONTROLS.
[Patty, F. (ed.). Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology: Volume II: Toxicology. 2nd ed. New York: Interscience Publishers, 1963.1232]**PEER REVIEWED**

EXPOSURE TO 2000 PPM FOR UP TO 375 MIN CAUSED IN SOME OF /GUINEA PIGS/ ... MOTOR ATAXIA AND APPARENT UNCONSCIOUSNESS; WITH 10,000 PPM THIS STAGE WAS REACHED IN 18 MIN. IT WAS PRECEDED BY VERTIGO, UNSTEADINESS AND ATAXIA.
[Browning, E. Toxicity and Metabolism of Industrial Solvents. New York: American Elsevier, 1965.92]**PEER REVIEWED**

LIVER & KIDNEY WT INCREASED IN RATS GIVEN SUBCHRONIC ORAL DOSES OF 408-680 MG/KG/DAY FOR 182 DAYS. /FROM TABLE/
[Clayton, G.D., F.E. Clayton (eds.) Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology. Volumes 2A, 2B, 2C, 2D, 2E, 2F: Toxicology. 4th ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1993-1994.1345]**PEER REVIEWED**

INHALATION @ 3050 PPM (15 MG/L) PRODUCED LOSS OF RIGHTING RESPONSE IN MICE & DEATH IN 2 HR FROM 9150 PPM (45 MG/L). IN GUINEA PIGS 1000 PPM (4.92 MG/L)/3 MIN PRODUCED SLIGHT NASAL IRRITATION, @ 8 MIN EYE IRRITATION; 2000 PPM (9.84 MG/L)/1 MIN PRODUCED MODERATE EYE & NASAL IRRITATION, UNCONSCIOUSNESS @ 345 MIN. /FROM TABLE/
[Clayton, G.D., F.E. Clayton (eds.) Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology. Volumes 2A, 2B, 2C, 2D, 2E, 2F: Toxicology. 4th ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1993-1994.1344]**PEER REVIEWED**

SUBACUTE EXPOSURE OF MALE RATS TO 2000 PPM PRODUCED INCREASES OF DOPAMINE & NORADRENALINE LEVELS & TURNOVER IN VARIOUS PARTS OF HYPOTHALAMUS & MEDIAN EMINENCE 16-18 HR FOLLOWING LAST EXPOSURE.
[ANDERSON K ET AL, TOXICOL APPL PHARMACOL 60 (3): 535 (1981)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Rats inhaling 600, 1200, or 2400 mg ethylbenzene/cu m for 24 hr/day from days 7-15 of pregnancy showed mild toxicity. The highest dose retarded skeletal development and weight gain in the fetuses and increased the incidence of extra ribs. Sacral displacement with abnormal development was observed in 2 instances. Thus, ethylbenzene, has some embryotoxic and teratogenic activity.
[Tatrai E et al; Egeszsegtudomany 26 (3): 297-303 (1982)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Ethylbenzene was investigated ... as a sensory irritant in mice. The concn necessary to depress the respiratory rate by 50% (RD 50) due to sensory irritation of the upper respiratory tract was 4060 ppm. ... A model for the sensory irritating action ... was proposed on the basis of ... physical interaction with a receptor protein.
[Nielsen GD, Alarie Y; Toxical Appl Pharmacol 65 (3): 459-77 (1982)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Drop application to rabbit eyes caused slight irritation and no corneal injury demonstrable by fluorescein staining. Standard testing on rabbit eyes gave an injury grade of 2 on a scale of 10.
[Grant, W.M. Toxicology of the Eye. 3rd ed. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas Publisher, 1986.413]**PEER REVIEWED**

Rats were exposed for 3 days by inhalation to 2000 ppm of a xylene mixture, or ... ethylbenzene. All solvents increased hepatic cytochrome p450 concn and NADPH-cytochrome C reductase activity. The ability of ethylbenzene to modify the metabolism of other potentially toxic substances in liver, kidney, and lung microsomes suggested the possibility of synergistic toxic responses.
[Toftgard R, Nilsen OG; Toxicol 23 (2-3): 197-212 (1982)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Concn of < 0.25 mg/l can cause tainting of fish flesh.
[Cleland, J.G., G.L. Kingsbury. Multimedia Environmental Goals for Environmental Assessment. Volume 1. EPA-600/7-77-136a. Research Triangle Park, NC: EPA, Nov. 1977.E-148]**PEER REVIEWED**

Neither maternal toxicity nor embryotoxicity was observed in gravid rabbits exposed to ethylbenzene /by inhalation/ at 100 or 1000 ppm.
[NIOSH; Teratologic Assessment of Ethylbenzene and 2-Ethoxyethanol p.iii (1981) NIOSH Contract No. 210-79-0037]**PEER REVIEWED**

Neither maternal toxicity nor embyrotoxicity was observed /in pregnant rats/ exposed to ethylbenzene /by inhalation/ at 100 ppm ... but /1000 ppm/ induced some indications of toxicity. ... A significant increase in the incidence of extra ribs was detected in rat fetuses exposed in utero to the high level.
[NIOSH; Teratologic Assessment of Ethylbenzene and 2-Ethoxyethanol p.iii (1981) NIOSH Contract No. 210-79-0037]**PEER REVIEWED**

Mice, B6C3F1 Fischer-344 rats, and /rabbits /New Zealand/ (five/sex/group) were exposed by inhalation to ethylbenzene vapors for 6 hr/day, 5 days/week for 4 weeks (20 exposures). Rats and mice received 0, 99, 382, or 782 ppm ethylbenzene while rabbits received 0, 382, 782, or 1610 ppm. No changes were evident in mortality patterns, clinical chemistries, urinalyses, or treatment-related gross/microscopic (including ophthalmologic) lesions. Rats exhibited sporadic lacrimation and salivation, as well as significantly increased liver weights at 382 and 782 ppm, and small increases in leukocyte counts at 782 ppm. Males at this exposure level also showed marginal elevations in platelet counts. In mice, females showed statistically increased absolute and relative liver weights at 382 and 782 ppm while males had statistically increased relative liver-to-brain weight ratios only at 782 ppm. Female rabbits at the high exposure level of 1610 ppm gained weight more slowly than controls (not statistically significant); males showed a similar transient downward trend after 1 week, but showed no differences from controls at study's end. A no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) of 382 ppm appears appropriate for rats and mice with a lowest observed adverse effect level (LOAEL) of 782 ppm. A NOAEL of 782 ppm and LOAEL of 1610 ppm are appropriate for rabbits.
[Cragg ST et al; Fundam Appl Toxicol 13 (3): 399-408 (1989)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Repeated application of undiluted ethyl benzene to the ear and shaved abdominal area of rabbits (10-20 applications over a period of 2-4 wk) resulted in erthyema, edema, and superficial necrosis. ... Two drops of ethyl benzene into the conjunctival sac produced only a slight irritation of the conjunctival membranes but no corneal injury.
[American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Inc. Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices. 6th ed. Volumes I, II, III. Cincinnati, OH: ACGIH, 1991.581]**PEER REVIEWED**

Inhalation of 2600 mg/cu m (600 ppm) ethyl benzene 7 hr/day, 5 days/wk for 186 days caused degeneration of the germinal epithelium in the testes of rabbits and monkeys but not of rats. Pregnant rats exposed at 100 or 1000 ppm 6 hr/day for 3 wk prior to mating and on days 1-19 of gestation had pups with a significant increase (p < 0.05) in extra rib formation; at the higher dose, maternal toxicity was indicated by increased liver, kidney, and spleen weights.
[American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Inc. Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices. 6th ed. Volumes I, II, III. Cincinnati, OH: ACGIH, 1991.582]**PEER REVIEWED**

... CONCLUSIONS: Under the conditions of these 2 yr inhalation studies, there was clear evidence of carcinogenic activity of ethylbenzene in male F344/N rats based on incr incidences of renal tubule neoplasms. The incidences of testicular adenoma were also incr. There was some evidence of carcinogenic activity of ethylbenzene in female F344/N rats based on incr incidences of renal tubule adenomas. There was some evidence of carcinogenic activity of ethylbenzene in male B6C3F1 mice based on incr incidences of alveolar/bronchiolar neoplasms. There was some evidence of carcinogenic activity of ethylbenzene in female B6C3F1 mice based on incr incidences of hepatocellular neoplasms.
[Toxicology & Carcinogenesis Studies of Ethylbenzene in F344/N Rats and B6C3F1 Mice p.5 Technical Report Series No. 466 (1999) NIH Publication No. 99-3956 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709]**PEER REVIEWED**

Efforts were made to clarify the molecular basis of styrene toxicity on the dopaminergic systems and to evaluate whether the same mechanism was common to other solvents. Groups of male New Zealand rabbits were exposed to 750 ppm toluene, xylene, styrene, ethylbenzene, vinyltoluene, 7-methyl-styrene, or fresh air (control group). A significant depletion in both striatal and tubero infundibular dopamine was caused by styrene, ethylbenzene, and vinyltoluene. Methylation of the aromatic ring of styrene did not change its activity, whereas methylation of the side chain drastically reduced its effect on dopamine. Treatment carried out with the main metabolites of aromatic solvents indicated that acidic metabolites of some solvents caused striatal and tubero infundibular dopamine depletion. Present data suggested a chemical reaction between dopamine and some acidic metabolites. The active metabolites have an alpha-keto acid as the side chain or as a part of their molecule. These keto acids condense nonenzymatically with dopamine.
[Mutti A; Toxicol 49 (1): 77-82 (1988)]**QC REVIEWED**

National Toxicology Program Studies:

... 2 Yr Study in Rats: Groups of 50 male and 50 female F344/N rats were exposed to 0, 75, 250 or 750 ppm ethylbenzene 6 hr day, 5 days/wk for 104 wk. ... 2 Yr Study in Mice: Groups of 50 male and 50 female B6C3F1 mice were exposed to 0, 75, 250 or 750 ppm ethylbenzene by inhalation, 6 hr/day, 5 days/wk for 103 wk. ... CONCLUSIONS: Under the conditions of these 2 yr inhalation studies, there was clear evidence of carcinogenic activity of ethylbenzene in male F344/N rats based on incr incidences of renal tubule neoplasms. The incidences of testicular adenoma were also incr. There was some evidence of carcinogenic activity of ethylbenzene in female F344/N rats based on incr incidences of renal tubule adenomas. There was some evidence of carcinogenic activity of ethylbenzene in male B6C3F1 mice based on incr incidences of alveolar/bronchiolar neoplasms. There was some evidence of carcinogenic activity of ethylbenzene in female B6C3F1 mice based on incr incidences of hepatocellular neoplasms.
[Toxicology & Carcinogenesis Studies of Ethylbenzene in F344/N Rats and B6C3F1 Mice p.5 Technical Report Series No. 466 (1999) NIH Publication No. 99-3956 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709]**QC REVIEWED**

Non-Human Toxicity Values:

LD50 Rat oral 5.46 g/kg.
[Budavari, S. (ed.). The Merck Index - An Encyclopedia of Chemicals, Drugs, and Biologicals. Whitehouse Station, NJ: Merck and Co., Inc., 1996.643]**PEER REVIEWED**

LD50 Rat oral 3500 mg/kg
[Lewis, R.J. Sax's Dangerous Properties of Industrial Materials. 9th ed. Volumes 1-3. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1996.1522]**PEER REVIEWED**

LD50 Mouse ip 2272 mg/kg
[Lewis, R.J. Sax's Dangerous Properties of Industrial Materials. 9th ed. Volumes 1-3. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1996.1522]**PEER REVIEWED**

LD50 Rabbit skin 17,800 mg/kg
[Lewis, R.J. Sax's Dangerous Properties of Industrial Materials. 9th ed. Volumes 1-3. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1996.1522]**PEER REVIEWED**

Ecotoxicity Values:

LC50 Lepomis macrochirus 32 mg/l/96 hr /Conditions of bioassay not specified/
[Pickering QH, Henderson C; J Water Pollut Control Fed 38: 1419 (1966)]**PEER REVIEWED**

LC50 Carassius auratus 94.44 mg/l/96 hr /Conditions of bioassay not specified/
[Pickering QH, Henderson C; J Water Pollut Control Fed 38: 1419 (1966)]**PEER REVIEWED**

LC50 Lebistes reticulatus 97.10 mg/l/96 hr /Conditions of bioassay not specified/
[Pickering QH, Henderson C; J Water Pollut Control Fed 38: 1419 (1966)]**PEER REVIEWED**

LC50 Mysidopsis bahia (shrimp) 87.6 mg/l 96 hr in a static unmeasured bioassay
[USEPA; In-depth Studies on Health Environmental Impacts of Selected Water Pollutants (1978) EPA No 68-01-4646]**PEER REVIEWED**

LC50 Cyprinodon variegatus (sheepshead minnow) 275 mg/l 96 hr in a static unmeasured bioassay
[USEPA; In-depth Studies on Health Environmental Impacts of Selected Water Pollutants (1978) EPA No 68-01-4646]**PEER REVIEWED**

LC50 Pimephales promelas (fathead minnow) 42.3 (hardwater) to 48.5 (softwater) mg/l 96 hr /Conditions of bioassay not specified/
[Pickering OH, Henderson C; J Water Pollut Control Fed 38: 1419 (1966)]**PEER REVIEWED**

LC50 Poecilla reticulata (guppy) 97.1 mg/l/96 hr /Conditions of bioassay not specified/
[Pickering OH, Henderson C; J Water Pollut Control Fed 38: 1419 (1966)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Toxicity threshold (cell multiplication inhibition test): Microcystis aeruginosa (algae) 33 mg/l; Scenedesmus quadricauda (green algae) > 160 mg/l
[Verschueren, K. Handbook of Environmental Data on Organic Chemicals. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1996.946]**PEER REVIEWED**

Toxicity threshold (cell multiplication inhibition test): Entosiphon sulcatum (protozoa) 140 mg/l; Uronema parduczi Chatton-Lwoff (protozoa) > 110 mg/l.
[Verschueren, K. Handbook of Environmental Data on Organic Chemicals. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1996.946]**PEER REVIEWED**

Toxicity threshold (cell multiplication inhibition test): Pseudomonas putida (bacteria) 12 mg/l.
[Verschueren, K. Handbook of Environmental Data on Organic Chemicals. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1996.946]**PEER REVIEWED**

LC50 Palaemonetes pugio (grass shrimp, adult) 14,400 ug/l/24 hr in a static unmeasured bioassay
[USEPA; Ambient Water Quality Criteria Doc: Ethylbenzene p.3-7 (1980) EPA 440/5-80-048]**PEER REVIEWED**

LC50 Palaemonetes pugio (grass shrimp, larva) 10,200 ug/l/24 hr in a static unmeasured bioassay
[USEPA; Ambient Water Quality Criteria Doc: Ethylbenzene p.3-7 (1980) EPA 440/5-80-048]**PEER REVIEWED**

LC50 Pimephales promelas (fathead minnow) 12.1 mg/l/96 hr (confidence limit 11.5 - 12.7 mg/l), flow-through bioassay with measured concentrations, 26.1 deg C, dissolved oxygen 7.0 mg/l, hardness 45.6 mg/l calcium carbonate, alkalinity 43.0 mg/l calcium carbonate, and pH 7.39.
[Geiger D.L., Poirier S.H., Brooke L.T., Call D.J., eds. Acute Toxicities of Organic Chemicals to Fathead Minnows (Pimephales Promelas). Vol. III. Superior, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin-Superior, 1986.189]**PEER REVIEWED**

TSCA Test Submissions:

In a single generation reproduction study, 380 female and 60 male Wistar rats were exposed to ethylbenzene at average daily concentrations of 97 or 959 ppm 7 hours per day, 5 days per week for 3 weeks. They were then mated and exposed daily on gestation days (GD) 1-19 at concentrations of 96 (low) or 985 (high) ppm. Animals were sacrificed and examined on GD 21. No significant differences were observed between treatment groups and controls in food consumption, gestational body weights (of pregnant rats), organ weights (of male rats), histopathology of liver, kidney or lungs, percent pregnancy, no. of corpora lutea, no. of implants, total live or dead fetuses, no. of live or dead fetuses per litter, no. of resorptions per litter and percent litters with resorptions. A significant difference (ANOVA, Duncan's multiple range test) was observed in pregestational body weights in both treatment groups. Maternal toxicity was indicated in the high dose groups (dosed at the high level during both periods or dosed with air during pregestational and with the high level during gestation) by significant differences (ANOVA, Duncan's multiple range test) in liver, spleen and kidney weights. Statistically significant differences were seen in mean crown-rump length (in the group which was dosed at the high level during both periods), supernumerary ribs (in the 2 high dose groups and the group which was dosed with air pregestationally and with the low level during gestation) and rudimentary rib incidence (in the group dosed with air during pregestation and with the high level during gestation).
[Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratories; Teratologic Assessment of Ethylbenzene and 2-Ethoxyethanol with Cover Letter Dated 061887, (1981), EPA Document No. 86870000402, Fiche No. OTS0513150]**UNREVIEWED**

In a single generation reproduction study 96 New Zealand White rabbits were artifically inseminated and exposed to ethylbenzene at average daily concentrations of 99 or 962 ppm 7 hours per day, through gestation day (GD) 24. Animals were sacrificed and examined on GD 30. Mortality was observed in 2 does, 1 from each dose group. No significant differences were observed between treatment groups and controls in the following: food consumption; body weight; weight gain; lung, kidney, and spleen mean weights; histopathology of liver, kidney, or lungs; percent pregnancy; no. of corpora lutea; no. of implants; total live or dead fetuses; no. of dead fetuses per litter; no. of resorptions per litter; percent litters with resorptions; and skeletal, visceral, or external parameters in fetuses. Significant differences (ANOVA, Duncan's multiple range test) relative to controls were observed in liver weights of the high dose group and in mean number of live fetuses per litter in both treatment groups.
[Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratories; Teratologic Assessment of Ethylbenzene and 2-Ethoxyethanol with Cover Letter Dated 061887, (1981), EPA Document No. 86870000402, Fiche No. OTS0513150]**UNREVIEWED**

Ethylbenzene (CAS# 100-41-4) was evaluated for developmental toxicity in 89, 77, and 77 female Wistar rats exposed to 0, 100, and 1000 ppm of the test material respectively by inhalation for 7 hours per day, 5 days per week for 3 weeks. They were then mated and exposed daily through the 19th day of gestation. The rats were killed and examined at the 21st day of gestation. No significant differences were observed in food consumption and body weights during progestational and gestational exposure periods. At 1000 ppm relative and absolute liver, spleen, and kidney weights were significantly greater than controls and or the 100 ppm group. No treatment-related histological changes were observed. Body weights, placenta weights, and sex ratios were all within normal limits. There were no significant increases in major malformations or minor anomalies. Litters were examined for the presence of external, visceral, and skeletal defects as well as the incidence of growth retardation and intrauterine mortality. A statistically significant increased incidence of fetal supernumary ribs was observed at the 1000 ppm exposure. It was concluded that ethylbenzene caused maternal and developmental toxicity (significant increase in extra ribs) at 1000 ppm.
[SHELL OIL CO; Teratogenic assessment of ethylbenzene and 2-ethoxyethanol; EPA 88-920002072, 1/01/81, Fiche No. OTS0539167]**UNREVIEWED**

Ethylbenzene (CAS# 100-41-4) was evaluated for developmental toxicity in 24, 23, and 22 New Zealand white rabbits artificially inseminated and exposed for 7 hours daily to 0, 100, and 1000 ppm of the test material respectively until the 24th day of gestation. Neither maternal toxicity nor embryotoxicity was observed in rabbits exposed to ethylbenzene at 100 or 1000 ppm. Rabbits had increased maternal liver weights at 1000 ppm and reduced mean number of live fetuses at 100 and 1000 ppm. No significant differences were observed in food consumption and weight gain. No treatment-related organ weight or histopathological changes were observed. Fetal size (weight and length), placenta weights, and sex ratios were all within normal limits. The sex ratios of the groups were not affected by treatment. No statistically significant incidences of major malformations, minor anomalies, or common variants were observed. It was concluded that the test material did not induce significant maternal toxicity, embryomortality, growth retardation, or teratogenicity at 1000 ppm.
[SHELL OIL CO; Teratogenic assessment of ethylbenzene and 2-ethoxyethanol; EPA 88-920002072, 1/01/81, Fiche No. OTS0539167]**UNREVIEWED**

The frequency of chromosomal aberrations was evaluated in vitro by exposing rats liver (RL1) cells to 25, 50 or 100 ug of ethyl benzene/ml. No increases in the frequency of chromatid gaps, chromatid breaks or total chromosome aberrations was observed at any dose level. Ethyl benzene did not induce chromosome damage in this assay.
[Shell Oil; In Vitro Genotoxicity Studies with Ethyl Benzene Hydroperoxide (EBHP) and Ethyl Benzene, (1981), EPA Doc. No. 86-870001656, Fiche No. OTS0515732]**UNREVIEWED**

The mutagenicity of ethyl benzene was evaluated in E. coli tester strains WP2 and WP2uvrA and in Salmonella tester strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537, and TA1538 (Ames test), both in the presence and absence of added metabolic activation by Aroclor-induced rat liver S9 fraction. Based on the results of preliminary bacterial toxicity determinations, ethyl benzene, in DMSO, was tested for mutagenicity at concentrations of 0.2, 2.0, 20.0, 200.0, and 2000.0 ug/plate using the direct plate incorporation method. Ethyl benzene did not cause a positive response in any of the tester strains with or without metabolic activation.
[Shell Oil; In Vitro Genotoxicity Studies with Ethyl Benzene Hydroperoxide (EBHP) and Ethyl Benzene, (1981), EPA Doc. No. 86-870001656, Fiche No. OTS0515732]**UNREVIEWED**

The ability of ethyl benzene to induce conversion of differentially inactive alleles to wild-type alleles in Saccharomyces cervisiae was examined in the mitotic gene conversion assay. The cultures were dosed with solutions of 20 ul (in the absence of added metabolic action provided by Aroclor-induced rat liver S9 fraction) or 25 ul (with S9) of 1, 10, 50, 100 or 500 mg ethyl benzene/ml. Ethyl benzene did not produce an increase mitotic gene conversion, either with or without added metabolic activation, and was not considered to be mutagenic in the assay.
[Shell Oil; In Vitro Genotoxicity Studies with Ethyl Benzene Hydroperoxide (EBHP) and Ethyl Benzene, (1981), EPA Doc. No. 86-870001656, Fiche No. OTS0515732]**UNREVIEWED**

Metabolism/Pharmacokinetics:

Metabolism/Metabolites:

ETHYL BENZENE IN MAN IS METABOLIZED 64% TO MANDELIC AND 25% TO PHENYLGLYOXYLIC ACID AND EXCRETED INTO URINE.
[Thienes, C., and T.J. Haley. Clinical Toxicology. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger, 1972.126]**PEER REVIEWED**

THE OXIDATION OF ETHYLBENZENE TO METHYLPHENYLCARBINOL IN ANIMALS ... WAS CONFIRMED ... WITH ADDITIONAL FINDING THAT BOTH ISOMERS OF METHYL PHENYL CARBINOL (THE + AND - FORMS) IN EQUAL AMT ARE RESULT OF ITS BIOLOGICAL HYDROXYLATION.
[Browning, E. Toxicity and Metabolism of Industrial Solvents. New York: American Elsevier, 1965.91]**PEER REVIEWED**

In the rabbit, it is metabolized to a number of oxidation products and subsequently excreted. The major urinary metabolite is hippuric acid. The oxidation products are benzoic acid, phenylacetic acid, and mandelic acid, excreted as the glycine conjugate, and also methylphenylcarbinol, 1-phenylethanol, excreted as the glucuronide.
[Clayton, G.D., F.E. Clayton (eds.) Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology. Volumes 2A, 2B, 2C, 2D, 2E, 2F: Toxicology. 4th ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1993-1994.1343]**PEER REVIEWED**

FROM A DOSE OF 100 MG/KG ADMIN ORALLY TO RATS ... THE URINARY METABOLITES, P-ETHYLPHENOL, ABOUT 0.3%, & SMALLER QUANTITIES OF 1- & 2-PHENYLETHANOL /WERE IDENTIFIED/.
[Clayton, G. D. and F. E. Clayton (eds.). Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology: Volume 2A, 2B, 2C: Toxicology. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley Sons, 1981-1982.3304]**PEER REVIEWED**

URINARY SULFATE RATIO DECREASES ARE NORMALLY A ROUGH EST OF DOSE-RELATED ALKYLBENZENE HYDROXYLATION DUE MAINLY TO SIDE CHAIN OXIDATION. ... THIS ... DOES NOT HOLD WITH DOSE-ACTION RELATIONSHIP FOR ETHYLBENZENE. ... AT HIGH DOSES, RING HYDROXYLATION INCREASES, ALTERING SULFATE RATIO.
[Clayton, G. D. and F. E. Clayton (eds.). Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology: Volume 2A, 2B, 2C: Toxicology. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley Sons, 1981-1982.3304]**PEER REVIEWED**

PRODUCTS OF RING HYDROXYLATION ... DETECTED FOR 1ST TIME IN RABBIT URINE. ... IDENTIFICATION OF M- & P-HYDROXYACETOPHENONE & ... ACETOPHENONE REVEALS THAT FURTHER OXIDATION IN SIDE-CHAIN OF ACETOPHENONE TO PHENACYL ALCOHOL (& THEN TO BENZOIC ACID) IS NOT ONLY PATHWAY. ... HOWEVER, RING-HYDROXYLATED PRODUCTS ARE ONLY MINOR ONES.
[The Chemical Society. Foreign Compound Metabolism in Mammals. Volume 4: A Review of the Literature Published during 1974 and 1975. London: The Chemical Society, 1977.247]**PEER REVIEWED**

SINCE ... (1+) & (-1)METHYLPHENYL CARBINOL YIELDED (-1)MANDELIC ACID /IN RATS/, AS DID ACETOPHENONE & OMEGA-HYDROXYACETOPHENONE, THE STEREOSELECTIVE STEP MUST OCCUR DURING OXIDATION &/OR REDUCTION OF LATTER ... EITHER PATHWAY IS POSSIBLE, FOR ... PHENYLGLYOXAL & ... PHENYLETHYLENE GLYCOL ... YIELDED (-)MANDELIC ACID STEREOSELECTIVELY.
[The Chemical Society. Foreign Compound Metabolism in Mammals. Volume 5: A Review of the Literature Published during 1976 and 1977. London: The Chemical Society, 1979.505]**PEER REVIEWED**

BENZOYLFORMIC ACID WAS BY-PRODUCT IN ALL ... EXPT /IN WHICH RATS WERE FED POSSIBLE INTERMEDIATES/. HOWEVER, WHEN THIS CMPD WAS FED, NO MANDELIC ACID WAS FORMED, & NEITHER WAS (-1)MANDELIC ACID CONVERTED INTO BENZOYLFORMIC ACID.
[The Chemical Society. Foreign Compound Metabolism in Mammals. Volume 5: A Review of the Literature Published during 1976 and 1977. London: The Chemical Society, 1979.505]**PEER REVIEWED**

FEMALE ASSISTANTS USING MIXTURE OF XYLENES & ETHYLBENZENE AS SOLVENT IN HISTOLOGY LAB WERE EXAM. AVG AIR CONCN OF (M + P)-XYLENE & ETHYLBENZENE WAS BETWEEN 56-68 & 34-41 PPM. APPROX 1.1 TO 1.4% OF RETAINED ETHYLBENZENE WAS METABOLIZED TO 2-ETHYL-PHENOL.
[ANGERER J ET AL; INT ARCH OCCUP ENVIRON HEALTH 43 (2): 145 (1979)]**PEER REVIEWED**

IN 3 LAB TECHNICIANS OCCUPATIONALLY EXPOSED TO ETHYLBENZENE, THE URINARY METABOLITES WERE AMYGDALIC ACID, PHENYLGLYOXYLIC ACID & 2-ETHYLPHENOL; WITHIN 24 HR MORE THAN 90% OF METABOLITES HAD BEEN EXCRETED.
[HAGEMANN J ET AL; KREBSGEFAEHRDUNG ARBEITSPLATZ/ARBEITSMED KOLLOQ, BER JAHRESTAG DTSCH GES ARBEITSMED, 19TH: 421 (1979)]**PEER REVIEWED**

After ip administration of /4.45 g/ ethylbenzene /to rabbits/ ... o-, p-, and m-hydroxyacetophenone were identified in urine. The above hydroxyacetophenones represented 0.11, 0.13, and 0.03% of the dose ... respectively.
[Kiese M, Lenk W; Xenobiotica 4: 337-43 (1974)]**PEER REVIEWED**

WHEN ABSORBED THROUGH SKIN, MANDELIC ACID WAS EXCRETED AT 4.6%, WHEREAS AFTER LUNG ABSORPTION MAJORITY OF ETHYLBENZENE WAS CONVERTED TO MANDELIC ACID & CONJUGATED WITH GLYCINE.
[Clayton, G.D., F.E. Clayton (eds.) Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology. Volumes 2A, 2B, 2C, 2D, 2E, 2F: Toxicology. 4th ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1993-1994.1343]**PEER REVIEWED**

After 2 volunteers were exposed to 65 ppm ethylbenzene for 3 hr, the metabolites of ethylbenzene in their urine, mandelic acid, hippuric acid (HA), and phenylglyoxylic (PhGA) were analyzed. The metabolites were excreted in the urine in the order mandelic acid > hippuric acid > phenylglyoxylic. The highest value of excretion was observed 6-10 hr after the beginning of exposure. Mandelic acid/phenylglyoxylic and hippuric/phenylglyoxylic mol ratios of total excretion in urine were 3.5 and 2.6 respectively.
[Yamasaki Y; Okayama Igakkai Zasshi 96 (5/6): 531-5 (1984)]**PEER REVIEWED**

The purpose of this study was to clarify whether the blood concentration of inhaled toluene, ethylbenzene, m-xylene, or mesitylene can change after the concomitant pulmonary absorption of ethyl acetate. (Adult female Sprague-Dawley rats were exposed in a 20 liter glass chamber under dynamic conditions for 2 hours to various concentrations of the aromatics without or in combination with different concentrations of ethyl acetate (0, 1000, or 4000 ppm) in air. Concentration ranges were as follows: toluene, 140-690 ppm; ethylbenzene, 120-650 ppm; m-xylene, 100-560 ppm; mesitylene, 120-720 ppm; and ethyl acetate, 1000 or 4000 ppm. The coexposures with ethyl acetate lowered the blood concentrations of other inhaled aromatics. This reduction was statistically significant following a 2 hour exposure to 230 ppm toluene in combination with 1000 ppm ethyl acetate, 650 ppm ethylbenzene with 1000 ppm ethyl acetate, and 100 ppm m-xylene with 4000 ppm ethyl acetate.) Similarly a significant reduction of the blood level of the aromatics by ethyl acetate coinhalation was also observed at higher exposure concentrations with toluene and m-xylene. A metabolic interaction such as enhanced disposition of the aromatics, may be responsible for these effects. However, it is possible that the solubility of the solvents could be altered by the presence of ethyl acetate. It was concluded that coexposures to concentrations in the order of the threshold limit values (100 ppm for these solvents) with 400 ppm ethyl acetate should not be followed by a dangerous change of the blood levels of the aromatics.
[Freundt KJ et al; Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 42 (4): 495-8 (1989)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Stereochemical considerations in the metabolism of ethylbenzene and styrene were investigated. Three alternative methods used to determine the enantiomeric composition of mandelic-acid in urine arising from exposure to styrene or ethylbenzene were described. Of the methods described, the direct gas chromatographic resolution of the enantiomers on a chiral stationary phase was the best approach. It was a simple analytical technique which avoids complex derivatization. An additional advantage was that it may be used as a gas liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry method and thus has advantages of sensitivity and specificity. F-19 nuclear magnetic resonance proved a useful alternative technique and was invaluable if standards of the pure isomers were not available. The major advantage of the nuclear magnetic resonance approach was that absolute configuration of the compound could be elucidated. (In experimental studies, rats were administered ethylbenzene or styrene at 100 mg/kg by the stomach tube; urine was collected over 96 hours. Male volunteers were exposed to ethylbenzene vapor in an exposure chamber at 435 mg/cu m for 4 hours; urine samples were collected before, during and after exposure. The results indicate that whereas only the R-enantiomer of mardelic acid was excreted after ethylbenzene exposure, the mandelic acid from styrene was essentially racemic. In three workers exposed occupationally to styrene, R/S ratios of 1.16, 1.27 and 1.14 were found. A synthetic R/S mixture of mandelic acid has a R/S ratio of 1.03.)
[Drummond L et al; Xenobiotica 19 (2): 199-207 (1989)]**PEER REVIEWED**

The principal metabolites of ethyl benzene in the rabbit are hippuric acid and methylphenylcarbinyl glucosiduronic acid (the glucuronide of methylphenylcarbinol), which were excreted in roughly the same amounts and accounts for 60-70% of the administered dose. Minor metabolites were pharmaceutic acid (10-20%) and mandelic acid (2%).
[American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Inc. Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices. 6th ed. Volumes I, II, III. Cincinnati, OH: ACGIH, 1991.583]**PEER REVIEWED**

Absorption, Distribution & Excretion:

ABSORPTION IS CHIEFLY BY INHALATION. A SMALL PROPORTION ... THAT GETS INTO THE BLOOD STREAM IS EXHALED UNCHANGED, BUT MOST OF IT /70%/ IS FOUND IN THE URINE AS METABOLITES BECAUSE OF OXIDATION OF THE SIDE CHAIN.
[Patty, F. (ed.). Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology: Volume II: Toxicology. 2nd ed. New York: Interscience Publishers, 1963.1232]**PEER REVIEWED**

IT IS ABSORBED ... THROUGH SKIN AT LOW RATE. ... HAS BEEN DETECTED IN SUBCUTANEOUS ADIPOSE TISSUE SAMPLES OF WORKERS 3 DAYS AFTER LOW TO HIGH EXPOSURE TO STYRENE & RELATED RUBBER MFR COMPONENTS. ... HAS BEEN DETECTED IN CORD BLOOD SAMPLES, INDICATING ... TRANSPORT THROUGH PLACENTA.
[Clayton, G.D., F.E. Clayton (eds.) Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology. Volumes 2A, 2B, 2C, 2D, 2E, 2F: Toxicology. 4th ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1993-1994.1343]**PEER REVIEWED**

Traces of ethylbenzene have been detected in exhaled air. It also occurs in the gas phase of smoke condensate and has been detected at 3.1 to 4.5 ppb in urban air.
[Clayton, G.D., F.E. Clayton (eds.) Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology. Volumes 2A, 2B, 2C, 2D, 2E, 2F: Toxicology. 4th ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1993-1994.1342]**PEER REVIEWED**

THREE LAB TECHNICIANS EXPOSED TO 42 PPM & 1 TO 34 PPM HAD AVG STEADY STATE BLOOD LEVELS OF 0.72 + OR - 0.11 MG/L. 30 MIN AFTER EXPOSURE CONCN HAD DROPPED TO APPROX 0.5% OF ORIGINAL VALUES.
[HAGEMANN J ET AL, KREBSGEFAEHRDUNG ARBEITSPLATZ/ARBEITSMED KOLLOQ, BER JAHRESTAG DTSCH GES ARBEITSMED 19TH: 421 (1979)]**PEER REVIEWED**

After exposure to 112-156 mg/l (aq) the skin absorption rate in humans (n= 14) was 0.11 to 0.21 mg/sq m/hr.
[Dutkiewicz T, Tyras H; Br J Ind Med 24 (4): 330-2 (1967)]**PEER REVIEWED**

When administered sc to 40 rats (2.5 ml, 1:1 v/v), ethylbenzene was detected in the blood within 2 hours, and the levels of ethylbenzene (10-15 ppm in blood) were maintained for at least 16 hours.
[USEPA; Ambient Water Quality Criteria Doc: Ethylbenzene p.C-6 (1980) EPA 440/5-80-048]**PEER REVIEWED**

After exposure of rats to atmospheres of 50, 300, or 600 ppm ethylbenzene 6 hr/day, 5 days/wk, for maximum of 16 wk, the concn of ethylbenzene in perirenal fat and the urinary excretion of 1-phenylethanol, omega-hydroxyacetophenone, mandelic acid, phenylglyoxylic acid, hippuric acid, and phenaceturic acid were measured at the 2nd, 5th, and 9th weeks. Excretion of metabolites into urine increased in a dose-related manner, but less than linearly. The level of exposure, but not the duration of exposure, markedly affected the pattern of the metabolites in the urine. The concn of ethylbenzene in perirenal fat was low at 50 ppm, high at 300 ppm and higher still at 600 ppm, but not in proportion to the increased dose.
[Engstroem K et al; Xenobiotica 15 (4): 281-6 (1985)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Percutaneous absorption of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and aniline was investigated in male HRS/J hairless mice. Stainless steel skin depots containing 100 to 150 mg of solid sorbent were fixed to the backs of anesthetized mice and charged with about 5 ul of (14)C tagged test solution. Expired air samples were obtained until 4 hours after exposure, when mice were killed and samples for radioactivity were obtained from the skin depot, the skin under the depot, a wiping of the skin under the depot, the carcass, feces, urine, and cage washings. Physical constants were determined for each test compound, including octanol/water partition coefficient, solubility, vapor pressure, melting and boiling points, and absorption and evaporation rates. Solvent recovery exceeded 90% in all mice with highest recovery in the skin depot. Average administered doses were 3.94 mg benzene, of which 0.99% was absorbed; 3.89 mg toluene (2.31% absorbed), 4.10 mg ethylbenzene (3.61% absorbed), and 4.68 mg aniline (4.76% absorbed). Excretion rate in expired air was fastest during the first 15 minutes of exposure except in mice treated with toluene or ethylbenzene, which demonstrated maximal excretion rate during the second 15 minutes after exposure. A two compartment model was suggested by the initial rapid and subsequent gradual decay of expired breath excretion. Vapor pressure and boiling point were significantly correlated with the applied radioactive dose absorbed. Absorption rates were found to be 56, 49, 37, and 2.3 ug per square centimeter per minute for benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and aniline, respectively.
[Susten AS et al; J Appl Toxicol 10 (3): 217-25 (1990)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Mechanism of Action:

The effect of styrene, toluene, ethylbenzene, alpha-methylstyrene, and butylbenzene on oxidative phosphorylation was studied using rat liver mitochondrial preparations. Rat liver mitochondria were prepared from male white Wistar rats and assessed for respiration rate, oxygen uptake, glutamate oxidation, succinate oxidation, ATPase activity, and proton permeability in the presence and absence of the alkyl benzene derivatives. Inclusion of the alkyl benzene derivatives in the incubation medium produced an initial acceleration of oxygen consumption followed by an inhibition of glutamate oxidation, and the stimulatory effect paralleled the aliphatic chain length. Glutamate oxidation was also inhibited by styrene, ethylbenzene, and alpha-methylstyrene but not by butylbenzene or toluene in 2,4-dinitrophenol uncoupled mitochondria. Styrene and the aliphatic benzene derivative stimulated succinate oxidation in rat liver mitochondria without effect on 2,4-dinitrophenol stimulated succinate oxidation. Similar stimulatory effects on ATPase activity were observed with maximal stimulation occurring at the same relative concentrations producing maximal succinate oxidation. ATPase stimulation required magnesium, was oligomycin sensitive, and showed an inverse relation to the hydrophobicity of the compounds tested. The inclusion of styrene in the incubation medium markedly increased the rate of passive entry of protons into rat liver mitochondria in a manner comparable to 2,4-dinitrophenol. It was concluded that styrene and other monosubstituted benzene derivatives act as mitochondrial uncoupling agents.
[Mickiewicz W, Rzeczycki W; Biochem Pharmacol 37 (23): 4439-44 (1988)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Effect of monocyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, their metabolites, and their structure on brain dopamine was studied. Adult male New Zealand rabbits were exposed to 750 ppm toluene, styrene, ethylbenzene, vinyltoluene, 7-methylstyrene, xylenes, and fresh air. Six groups of eight rabbits received 4 mM/kg ip for 3 days of hippuric acid, mandelic acid, methylhippuric acid, phenylglyoxylic acid, or 7-methylmandelic acid. Animals were killed 12 hours after inhalation exposure or 24 hours after the last dose of acid. The hypothalamus, striatum, hippocampus, tuberoinfundibular area, and part of the brain cortex were treated with 0.2 molar perchloric acid, homogenized, desorbed on alumina, and centrifuged. Supernatant was filtered and used to measure homovanillic acid. Styrene induced a marked dopamine depletion and a significant increase in homovanillic acid concentration. Ethylbenzene and vinyltoluene produced a smaller, but statistically significant effect. Toluene, xylenes, and 7-methylstyrene were ineffective. Phenylglyoxylic acid caused a decrease in dopamine levels and a consistent rise in homovanillic acid in striatal and tuberoinfundibular regions. Mandelic acid elicited the same effect, but to a lesser degree. 7-Methylmandelic, methylhippuric, and hippuric acids evoked no response. Neither solvents nor their metabolites affected norepinephrine contents of brain areas in which this neurotransmitter reaches high concentrations. It was concluded that the results indicate that the changes in brain dopamine depend on metabolic interferences of some metabolites of aromatic solvents with dopamine catabolism. Only metabolites whose side chain may be transformed into a alpha-keto acid caused dopamine depletion.
[Romanelli A et al; J Appl Toxicol 6 (6): 431-5 (1986)]**PEER REVIEWED**

The effect of organic solvents on the CNS was discussed. The similarity of effects of different solvents is believed to be due to the formation of tetrahydroisoquinolines by nonenzymatic condensation of dopamine with metabolites of organic solvents having a reactive carbonyl group. The suspected metabolites are phenylglyoxylic- acid that is formed by metabolism of ethylbenzene, styrene, vinyltoluene; trichloroacetaldehyde, which derives from trichloroethylene, tetrachloroethylene; and trichloroethane; glyoxylic acid that is synthesized from ethyleneglycol and ethyleneglycolmonomethyl ether; formaldehyde that is metabolized from methanol; and acetaldehyde that is transformed from ethanol. The tuberoinfundibular dopaminergic system may represent a target for metabolites dissolved in the blood stream. The suggested mechanism implies a selective vulnerability of pituitary functions. The impairment of tuberoinfundibular activity may explain most of the behavioral changes observed with styrene and perhaps with other similar solvents. It appears that the majority of pathways that are affected in the hypothalamic control of gonadotropins in primates are adrenergic and dopaminergic. Occupational exposure to neurotoxins may cause repeated reversible CNS effects which are difficult to distinguish from the chronic effects. In workers exposed to styrene a relationship between recent exposure and measurable effects on CNS has been observed and prolonged exposure has failed to induce tolerance. It was concluded that although no excessive risk for Alzheimer disease and presenile dementia has been found, there is no indication that exposure to solvents does not cause irreversible or slowly reversible cognitive or neuropsychological impairment.
[Mutti A, Franchini I; Br J Ind Med 44 (11): 721-3 (1987)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Efforts were made to clarify the molecular basis of styrene toxicity on the dopaminergic systems and to evaluate whether the same mechanism was common to other solvents. Groups of male New Zealand rabbits were exposed to 750 ppm toluene, xylene, styrene, ethylbenzene, vinyltoluene, 7-methyl-styrene, or fresh air (control group). A significant depletion in both striatal and tubero infundibular dopamine was caused styrene, ethylbenzene, and vinyltoluene. Methylation of the aromatic ring of styrene did not change its activity, whereas methylation of the side chain drastically reduced its effect on dopamine. Treatments carried out with the main metabolites of aromatic solvents indicated that acidic metabolites of some solvents cause striatal and tubero infundibular dopamine depletion. Present data suggested a chemical reaction between dopamine and some acidic metabolites. The active metabolites have an alpha-keto acid as the side chain or as a part of their molecule. These keto acids condense nonenzymatically with dopamine in both experimental models and in occupational exposed workers as evidenced by the direct measurements of dopamine in the brain. According to the authors, such a mechanism may account for neurobehavioral effects resulting from solvent exposure such as mood changes, or impaired attention spans and decreasing psychomotor performance factors.
[Mutti A et al; Toxicol 49 (1, part 1): 77-82 (1988)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Interactions:

IN LAB ASSISTANTS USING XYLENES & ETHYLBENZENE, 2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL, METAB OF M-XYLENE COULD NOT BE DETECTED. COMPETITIVE REACTION BETWEEN XYLENES & ETHYLBENZENE PREVENTED M-XYLENE FROM OXIDATION. ...
[ANGERER J ET AL; INT ARCH OCCUP ENVIRON HEALTH 43 (2): 145 (1979)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Pharmacology:

Interactions:

IN LAB ASSISTANTS USING XYLENES & ETHYLBENZENE, 2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL, METAB OF M-XYLENE COULD NOT BE DETECTED. COMPETITIVE REACTION BETWEEN XYLENES & ETHYLBENZENE PREVENTED M-XYLENE FROM OXIDATION. ...
[ANGERER J ET AL; INT ARCH OCCUP ENVIRON HEALTH 43 (2): 145 (1979)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Environmental Fate & Exposure:

Environmental Fate/Exposure Summary:

Ethylbenzene's production and use as an intermediate for the production of styrene, its presence in automotive and aviation fuels, and its presence in crude oil may result in its release to the environment through various waste streams. If released to air, a vapor pressure of 9.6 mm Hg at 25 deg C indicates ethylbenzene will exist solely as a vapor in the ambient atmosphere. Vapor-phase ethylbenzene will be degraded in the atmosphere by reaction with photochemically-produced hydroxyl radicals; the half-life for this reaction in air is estimated to be 55 hr. If released to soil, ethylbenzene is expected to have moderate mobility based upon an estimated Koc of 520. Volatilization from moist soil surfaces is expected to be an important fate process based upon a Henry's Law constant of 7.88X10-3 atm-cu m/mole. Ethylbenzene may volatilize from dry soil surfaces based upon its vapor pressure. Biodegradation in soil takes place via nitrate-reducing processes. If released into water, ethylbenzene may adsorb to suspended solids and sediment in water based upon the estimated Koc. Biodegradation in a gasoline contaminated aquifer ranged from 10-16 days under aerobic conditions. Ethylbenzene was degraded in 8 days in groundwater and 10 days in seawater as a component of gas oil. Volatilization from water surfaces is expected to be an important fate process based upon this compound's Henry's Law constant. Estimated volatilization half-lives for a model river and model lake are 1.1 and 99 hrs, respectively. Measured BCFs of 0.67 to 15 suggest the potential for bioconcentration in aquatic organisms is low. Hydrolysis is not expected to occur due to the lack of hydrolyzable functional groups. Occupational exposure to ethylbenzene may occur through inhalation at municipal waste composting facilities and via inhalation and dermal contact with this compound at workplaces where ethylbenzene is produced or used. The general population may be exposed to ethylbenzene via inhalation of ambient air, drinking and eating contaminated foods and water, and by handling gasoline. Ethylbenzene is likely to be detected in groundwater. (SRC)
**PEER REVIEWED**

Probable Routes of Human Exposure:

NIOSH (NOES Survey 1981-1983) has statistically estimated that 80,726 workers (21,785 of these are female) are potentially exposed to ethylbenzene in the US(1). Occupational exposure to ethylbenzene may occur via inhalation at municipal waste composting facilities where the air concn was found to be 78,000-178,000 ug/cu m(2),and through inhalation and dermal contact with this compound at worplaces where ethylbenzene is produced or used(SRC). The general population may be exposed to ethylbenzene via inhalation of ambient air, ingestion of foods and fish, and drinking contaminated water, and dermal contact with this compound and other products such as gasoline which contains ethylbenzene(SRC).
[(1) NIOSH; National Occupational Exposure Survey (NOES) (1983) (2) Eitzer BD; Environ Sci Technol 29: 896-902 (1995)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Body Burden:

Ethylbenzene was detected, not quantified, in 8 of 8 samples of mother's milk from 4 US urban areas(1). 16.5% of 387 expired air samples taken from 54 normal, healthy, urban volunteers were positive for ethylbenzene concn with an avg of 1.8 ng/l expired air(2). Whole blood samples from 250 subjects ranged in ethylbenzene concns from not detected to 59 ppb, with an avg of 1.0 ppb(3).
[(1) Pellizzari ED et al; Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 28: 322-8 (1982) (2) Krotoszynski BK et al; J Anal Toxicol 3: 225-34 (1979) (3) Antoine SR et al; Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 36: 364-71 (1986)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Average Daily Intake:

AIR INTAKE: (assume air concn of 0.2-2.7 ppb)(2-6); 17-235 ug; WATER INTAKE: (assume water concn of 0-4 ppb(1)) 0-8 ug; FOOD INTAKE: insufficient data(SRC).
[(1) Konasewich D et al; Status Report on Organic and Heavy Metal Contaminants in the Lake Erie, Michigan, Huron and Superior Basins. Great Lakes Quality Review Board (1978) (2) Arnts RR, Meeks SA; Biogenic Hydrocarbon Contribution to the Ambient Air of Selected Areas p. 31 USEPA-600/3-80-023 (1980) (3) Atshuller AP et al; Environ Sci Technol 5: 1009-16 (1981) (4) Lonneman WA et al; Environ Sci Technol 2: 1017-20 (1968) (5) Singh HB et al; Atmos Environ 15: 601-12 (1981) (6) Singh HB et al; Atmospheric Measurements of Selected Toxic Organic Chemicals USEPA-600/3-80-072 (1980)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Natural Pollution Sources:

Ethylbenzene is a product of biomass combustion(1), and a component of crude oil(2).
[(1) Graedel TE; Atmospheric Chemical Compounds. New York NY Academic Press (1986) (2) Nunes P, Benville PE JR; Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 21: 71-24 (1979)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Artificial Pollution Sources:

Ethylbenzene is present at 0.02 wt% in coke-oven tars.
[Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology. 3rd ed., Volumes 1-26. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, 1978-1984.V22 572 (1983)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Ethylbenzene's production and use as an intermediate for the manufacture of styrene and use as a resin solvent(1), intermediate for the production of diethylbenzene and acetophenone(2), and its use as a component of automotive and aviation fuels(3) may result in its release to the environment through various waste streams.
[(1) Budavari S, ed; The Merck Index. 12th ed. Whitehouse Station, NJ: Merck and Co., Inc. p. 643 (1996) (2) Coty RR et al; Ullmann's Encycl Indust Chem. 5th ed. Deerfield Beach, FL: VCH Pub A 10: 35-43 (1985) (3) Clayton GB, Clayton FE; Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology. 2B: Toxicology. 4th ed. NY, NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc 2B: 1342 (1994)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Environmental Fate:

TERRESTRIAL FATE: Based on a classification scheme(1), an estimated Koc value of 520(SRC), determined from a structure estimation method(2), indicates that ethylbenzene is expected to have moderate mobility in soil(SRC). Volatilization of ethylbenzene from moist soil surfaces is expected to be an important fate process(SRC) given a Henry's Law constant of 7.88X10-3 atm-cu m/mole(3). The potential for volatilization of ethylbenzene from dry soil surfaces may exist(SRC) based upon a vapor pressure of 9.6 mm Hg(4). Ethylbenzene was completely degraded in microcosms inoculated with the sediment material from a refinery pond or activated sludge from the refinery treatment facility under nitrate-reducing conditions(5). At Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore in Michigan, ethylbenzene was degraded at slow rates via anaerobic degradation under ambient subsurface conditions using ferric iron, sulfate and/or carbon dioxide as the terminal electron acceptors(6).
[(1) Swann RL et al; Res Rev 85: 17-28 (1983) (2) Meylan WM et al; Environ Sci Technol 26: 1560-67 (1992) (3) Sanemasa I et al; Bull Chem Soc Japan 55: 1054-62 (1982) (4) Daubert TE et al; Physical and Thermodynamic Properties of Pure Chemicals. NY, NY: Hemisphere Pub Corp (1989) (5) Ball HA et al; pp. 458-63 in In-Situ Bioreclamation. Hinchee RE, Olfenbuttel RF, eds. Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann (1991) (6) Borden RC et al; Anaerobic biodegradation of BTEX in aquifer material. USEPA/600/S-97/003 pp. 9 (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

AQUATIC FATE: Based on a classification scheme(1), an estimated Koc value of 520(SRC), determined from an estimation method(2), indicates that ethylbenzene may adsorb to suspended solids and sediment(SRC). Volatilization from water surfaces is expected(3) based upon a Henry's Law constant of 7.88X10-3 atm-cu m/mole(4). Using this Henry's Law constant and an estimation method(3), volatilization half-lives for a model river and model lake are 1.1 and 99 hr, respectively(SRC). According to a classification scheme(5), an experimental log BCF of 1.19(7), which corresponds to a BCF of 15, suggests the potential for bioconcentration in aquatic organisms is low. In a shallow coastal plain aquifer contaminated with gasoline and diesel fuel in rural Sampson County in North Carolina, ethylbenzene was degraded in aerobic conditions within 10-16 days and in conditions of low initial oxygen, it was rapidly degraded in 21 days until the available oxygen was depleted(8). As a component of gas oil, ethylbenzene is completely degraded in groundwater in 8 days(9) and seawater in 10 days(10). In a mesocosm experiment using simulated Narragansett Bay conditions, complete biodegradation occurred in approximately 2 days after a 2 week lag in spring and a 2 day lag in summer(11).
[(1) Swann RL et al; Res Rev 85: 17-28 (1983) (2) Meylan WM et al; Environ Sci Technol 26: 1560-67 (1992) (3) Lyman WJ et al; Handbook of Chemical Property Estimation Methods. Washington, DC: Amer Chem Soc pp. 4-9, 15-1 to 15-29 (1990) (4) Sanemasa I et al; Bull Chem Soc Japan 55: 1054-62 (1982) (5) France C et al; Chemosphere 29: 1501-14 (1994) (6) Hansch C et al; Exploring QSAR. Hydrophobic, Electronic, and Steric Constants. ACS Prof Ref Book. Heller SR, consult. ed., Washington, DC: Amer Chem Soc p. 43 (1995) (7) Park JH, Lee HJ; Chemosphere 26: 1905-16 (1993) (8) Borden RC et al; Water Resour Res 33: 1105-15 (1996) (9) Kappeler T, Wuhrmann K; Water Res 12: 327-33 (1978) (10) Van der Linden AC; Dev Biodegrad Hydrocarbons 1: 165-200 (1978) (11) Wakeham SG et al; Environ Sci Technol 17: 611-7 (1983)]**PEER REVIEWED**

ATMOSPHERIC FATE: According to a model of gas/particle partitioning of semivolatile organic compounds in the atmosphere(1), ethylbenzene, which has a vapor pressure of 9.6 mm Hg at 25 deg C(2), is expected to exist solely as a vapor. Vapor-phase ethylbenzene is degraded in the atmosphere by reaction with photochemically-produced hydroxyl radicals(SRC); the half-life for this reaction in air is 55 hr(SRC), calculated from its rate constant of 7.1X10-12 cu cm/molecule-sec at 25 deg C(3).
[(1) Bidleman TF; Environ Sci Technol 22: 361-367 (1988) (2) Daubert TE et al; Physical & Thermodynamic Properties of Pure Chemicals NY, NY: Hemisphere Pub Corp (1989) (3) Atkinson R; J Phys Chem Ref Data Monograph No. 2 p. 48 (1994)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Environmental Biodegradation:

After a period of inocula adaptation, ethylbenzene is biodegraded fairly rapidly by sewage or activated sludge inoculua(1-3,9). As a component of gas oil, it is completely degraded in groundwater in 8 days(4) and seawater in 10 days(5). In a mesocosm experiment using simulated Narragansett Bay conditions, complete biodegradation occurred in approximately 2 days after a 2 week lag in spring and a 2 day lag in summer(6). Part of the attenuation in concn from a leaky gasoline storage tank in the chalk aquifer in England has been attributed to biodegradation(7). No degradation was observed in an anaerobic reactor even after 110 days acclimation(8) or at low concentrations in a batch reactor in 11 weeks under denitrifying conditions(10). Percent removal in an anaerobic, continuous-flow, laboratory bioflim column was 7% after a 2 day detention time(11); 99% removal was observed in a similar aerobic column following a 20 min detention time(11).
[(1) Slave T et al; Rev Chim 25: 666-70 (1974) (2) Tabak HH et al; J Water Pollut Control Fed 53: 1503-18 (1981) (3) Malaney GW, McKinney RE; Water Sewage Works 113: 302-9 (1966) (4) Kappeler T, Wuhrmann K; Water Res 12: 327-33 (1978) (5) Van der Linden AC; Dev Biodegrad Hydrocarbons 1: 165-200 (1978) (6) Wakeham SG et al; Environ Sci Technol 17: 611-7 (1983) (7) Tester DJ, Harker RJ; Water Pollut Control 80: 614-31 (1981) (8) Chou WL et al; Biotechnol Bioeng Symp 8: 391-414 (1979) (9) USEPA; Treatability Manual p 1.9.8-1 to 1.9.8-5 USEPA 600/2-82-001a (1981) (10) Bouwer EJ, McCarty PL; Appl Environ Microbiol 45: 1295-99 (1983) (11) Bouwer EJ, McCarthy PL; Ground Water 22: 433-40 (1984)]**PEER REVIEWED**

AEROBIC: A study was conducted using underground storage tanks containing gasoline and diesel fuel that contaminated a shallow coastal plain aquifer in rural Sampson County in North Carolina. Ethylbenzene was degraded in aerobic conditions within 10-16 days and in conditions of low initial oxygen, it was rapidly degraded in 21 days until the available oxygen was depleted(1). A combined culture experiment of Mycobacterium vaccae and Rhodococcus sp. strain R-22 showed M. vaccae alone and M. vaccae and R-22 together can oxidize ethylbenzene to 4-ethylphenol which is then degraded to 50 ppm within 72 hr(2).
[(1) Borden RC et al; Water Resour Res 33: 1105-15 (1996) (2) Fairlee JR et al; J Microbiol 43: 841-6 (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

ANAEROBIC: Anaerobic ethylbenzene transformation in Seal Beach Naval Weapons Station sediments in Southern California appeared to be strictly associated with nitrate-reducing processes(1). Ethylbenzene was completely degraded in microcosms inoculated with the sediment material from a refinery pond or activated sludge from the refinery treatment facility under nitrate-reducing conditions(2). At Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore in Michigan, ethylbenzene was degraded at slow rates via anaerobic degradation under ambient subsurface conditions using ferric iron, sulfate and/or carbon dioxide as the terminal electron acceptors(3).
[(1) Ball HA, Reinhard M; Environ Toxicol Chem 15: 114-22 (1996) (2) Ball HA et al; pp. 458-63 in In-Situ Bioreclamation. Hinchee RE, Olfenbuttel RF, eds. Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann (1991) (3) Borden RC et al; Anaerobic biodegradation of BTEX in aquifer material. USEPA/600/S-97/003 pp. 9 (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Environmental Abiotic Degradation:

The rate constant for the vapor-phase reaction of ethylbenzene with photochemically-produced hydroxyl radicals is 7.1X10-12 cu cm/molecule-sec at 298 K(1) which corresponds to an atmospheric half-life of about 55 hr at an atmospheric concn of 5X10+5 hydroxyl radicals per cu cm. Ethylbenzene is not expected to undergo hydrolysis in the environment due to the lack of hydrolyzable functional groups(2). Ethylbenzene photolysis occurs via photooxidation hydrogen abstraction from the alkyl group by photooxydatively formed hydroxyl radical which results in the formation of acetophenone, and eventually benzaldehyde with 2-butanedial, 4-oxo-2-hexenal, and 2-ethyl-2-butenedial being suggested as further end products(3).
[(1) Atkinson R; J Phys Chem Ref Data Monograph No. 2 p. 48 (1994) (2) Lyman WJ et al; Handbook of Chemical Property Estimation Methods. Washington, DC: Amer Chem Soc pp. 7-4, 7-5 (1990) (3) Forstner HJL et al; Environ Sci Technol 31: 1345-58 (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Environmental Bioconcentration:

Experimental data on the bioconcentration of ethylbenzene include a log BCF of 1.9 in goldfish(2) and a log BCF of 0.67 for clams exposed to the water-soluble fraction of crude oil(1). Experimentally, a log BCF of 1.19 has also been reported(4) which corresponds to a BCF of 15. According to a classification scheme(3), these BCFs suggest the potential for bioconcentration in aquatic organisms is low.
[(1) Nunes P, Benville PE Jr; Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 21: 719-24 (1979) (2) Ogata M et al; Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 33: 561-7 (1984) (3) Franke C et al; Chemosphere 29: 1501-14 (1994) (4) Park JH, Lee HJ; Chemosphere 26: 1905-16 (1993)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Soil Adsorption/Mobility:

Using a structure estimation method based on molecular connectivity indices(1), the Koc for ethylbenzene can be estimated to be 520(SRC). According to a classification scheme(2), this estimated Koc value suggests that ethylbenzene is expected to have low mobility in soil.
[(1) Meylan WM et al; Environ Sci Technol 26: 1560-67 (1992) (2) Swann RL et al; Res Rev 85: 17-28 (1983)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Volatilization from Water/Soil:

The Henry's Law constant for ethylbenzene is 7.88X10-3 atm-cu m/mole(1). This Henry's Law constant indicates that ethylbenzene will volatilize from water surfaces(2). Based on this Henry's Law constant, the volatilization half-life from a model river (1 m deep, flowing 1 m/sec, wind velocity of 3 m/sec)(2) is estimated as 1.1 hr(SRC). The volatilization half-life from a model lake (1 m deep, flowing 0.05 m/sec, wind velocity of 0.5 m/sec)(2) is estimated as 99 hr(SRC). Ethylbenzene's Henry's Law constant(1) indicates that volatilization from moist soil surfaces may occur(SRC). The potential for volatilization of ethylbenzene from dry soil surfaces may exist(SRC) based upon a vapor pressure of 9.6 mm Hg(3).
[(1) Sanemasa I et al; Bull Chem Soc Jpn 55: 1054-62 (1982) (2) Lyman WJ et al; Handbook of Chemical Property Estimation Methods. Washington, DC: Amer Chem Soc pp. 15-1 to 15-29 (1990) (3) Daubert TE et al; Physical & Thermodynamic Properties of Pure Chemicals NY, NY: Hemisphere Pub Corp (1989)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Environmental Water Concentrations:

DRINKING WATER: In surveys of representative US municipal water supplies, ethylbenzene has been detected in most cases(1,2,4-8,10). Values for 3 New Orleans finished drinking waters ranged 1.6 to 2.3 ppb(6). Chicago Central Water Works on Lake Michigan measured 4 ppb(8). It has been found in the water supply for Evansville, IN on the Ohio River(7). 6 of 10 US cities were found to be positive(1,4). One US city had 1 of 4 samples pos with a 1 ppb avg, while another reported no positive samples(5). Tap water from bank infiltrated Rhine River water in the Netherlands measured 30 ppb in one study(3). Zurich, Switzerland tap water - detected not quantified(9). 1982 US groundwater supply survey, random samples of finished water supplies using groundwater as a source, 466 random samples, 0.6%, pos (0.5 ppb detection limit), 0.8 ppb median, 1.1 ppb max(10).
[(1) NAS; The Alkylbenzenes p III-13 Contract 68-01-4655 (1980) (2) Shackelford WM, Keith, LH; Frequency of Organic Compounds in Surface Waters USEPA 600/4-76-062 (1976) (3) Piet GJ, Morra CF; p 31-42 in Artificial Groundwater Recharge; Huisman L, Olsthorn TN, eds (1983) (4) Bedding ND et al; Sci Total Environ 25: 143-67 (1982) (5) Callahan MA et al; p 55-61 in 8th Natl Conf Munic Sludge Manage Proc (1979) (6) Keith, LH et al; p 329-73 in Identification and Analysis of Organic Pollutants in Water. Keith LH ed (1976) (7) Kleopfer RD, Fairless BJ; Environ Sci Technol 6: 1036-7 (1972) (8) Konasewich D et al; Status Report on Organic and Heavy Metal Contaminants in the Lakes Erie, Michigan, Huron and Superior Basins. Great Lakes Quality Review Board (1978) (9) Santodonato J et al; Investigation of selected potential environmental contaminants: styrene, ethylbenzene and related compounds 261 p USEPA 560/11-80-018 (1980) (10) Cotruvo JA; Sci Technol Environ 47: 7-26 (1985)]**PEER REVIEWED**

GROUNDWATER: A well in Ames, IA measured 15 ppb 50 yr after tar residues were buried at a nearby coal gas plant(5). Concns of 82-400 ppb were detected in two aquifers near the Hoe Creek underground coal gasification site in Wyoming, 15 mo after gasification was complete(2). In a US survey, 1970-76, it was detected but not quantified in well waters(1). In Jackson Township, NJ, drinking water wells measured 2000 ppb(4). Chalk aquifer in East Anglia, England - 210 m from petroleum storage - 0.15 ppb, 10 m distance - 1110 ppb, and 100-200 m - <250 ppb(3).
[(1) Shackelford WM, Keith, LH; Frequency of Organic Compounds Identified in Water USEPA 600/4-76-062 (1976) (2) Stuermer DH et al; Environ Sci Technol 16: 582-7 (1982) (3) Tester DH, Harker RJ; Water Pollut Control 80: 614-31 (1981) (4) Burmaster DE; Environ 24: 6-13, 33-6 (1982) (5) Santodonato J et al; Investigation of Selected Potential Environmental Contaminants: Styrene, Ethylbenzene and Related Compounds 261 p USEPA 560/11-80-018 (1980)]**PEER REVIEWED**

SURFACE WATER: Ethylbenzene has been detected but not quantified in a 1970-76 US survey(1,4). 14 heavily industrialized US river basins, 5 of 204 sites pos - 1-4 ppb; Chicago area and Illinois River Basin, 5 of 31 sites pos - 1-4 ppb(6). Two representative US cities, city A - 41% of 28 samples pos, 5.0 ppb avg, city B - 40% of 48 samples pos 3.2 ppb avg(2). Lower Tennessee River near Calvert City, KY reported 4.0 ppb(7). Lake Michigan, Chicago Sanitary and Ship Channel measured 1-2 ppb(3). River Glatt, Switzerland -detected, not quantified(5). USEPA STORET database, 1,101 data points, 10% pos, <5.0 ppb median(8).
[(1) Shackelford WM, Keith LH; Frequency of Organic Compounds Identified in Water USEPA 600/4-76-062 (1976) (2) Callahan MA et al; p 55-61 in 8th Natl Conf Munic Sludge Manage Proc (1979) (3) Konasewich D et al; Status Report on Organic and Heavy Metal Contaminants in the Lakes Erie, Michigan, Huron and Superior Basins. Great Lakes Quality Review Board (1978) (4) Bertsch W et al; J Chromatogr 112: 701-18 (1975) (5) Zuercher F, Giger W; Vom Wasser 47: 37-55 (1976) (6) Ewing BB et al; Monitoring to Detect Previously Unrecognized Pollutants in Surface Waters 75 p USEPA 560/6-77-015 (appendix USEPA 560/6-77-015a) (1977) (7) Goodley PG, Gordon M; Kentucky Acad Sci 37: 11-5 (1976) (8) Staples CA et al; Environ Toxicol Chem 4: 131-42 (1985)]**PEER REVIEWED**

SEAWATER: Ethylbenzene concns were found to be 30-50 ng/l in an estuary in Brazos, US; between <10-46.3 ng/l in UK; and 36.9 ng/l in Belgium(1). Ethylbenzene has been found in concns of 4.5-30 ng/l in Vineyard Sound; 0.4-4.5 ng/l in coastal and shelf sea water in the Gulf of Mexico; 5.5-22 ng/l in the coastal waters of Spain; 4.3-380 ng/l in Campeche Shelf; <10 ng/l in shelf and bay waters in UK; and 9.4-18.7 ng/l in Belgian Continental Shelf(1). Ethylbenzene mean concn of 21.94 ng/l was found in the South Northern sea up to 60 km offshore in the Scheldt Estuary(2). In the coastal waters off the western Gulf of Mexico at the mouth of the Brazos River, TX, ethylbenzene concns range between 0.004-0.5 ug/l(3). In the Gulf of Mexico in unpolluted areas ethylbenzene concn is 0.4 to 5 ppb(4,6), while an area of anthropogenic influence ranged from 5 to 15 ppb(6). Cape Cod, MA measured ethylbenzene at 22 ppb(5,7) with 11 ppb being avg(5). In the coastal waters of the Dutch Northern Sea, 108 samples ranged from not detected to 20 parts per trillion and averaged 4 parts per trillion(8).
[(1) Dewulf J, Vanlangenhove H; Water Res 31: 1825-38 (1997) (2) Dewulf JP et al; Environ Sci Technol 32: 903-11 (1998) (3) Neff JM, Sauer TC Jr; Environ Sci Res 52: 163-75 (1996)(4) Sauer TC Jr et al; Mar Chem 7: 1-16 (1978) (5) Gschwend PM et al; Environ Sci Technol 16: 31-8 (1982) (6) Sauer TC Jr; Org Geochem 3: 91-101 (1981) (7) Mantoura RFC; Environ Sci Technol 16: 38-45 (1982) (8) Van de Meent D et al; Water Sci Technol 18: 73-81 (1986)]**PEER REVIEWED**

RAIN WATER: West Los Angeles, CA - 9 parts/trillion(1). Concn (parts/trillion) dissolved in rain, Portland, OR, Feb-April 1984, 7 rain events, 100% pos, 6.9-72, 34 avg(2).
[(1) Kawamura K, Kaplan IR; Environ Sci Technol 17: 497-501 (1983) (2) Ligocki MP; Atmos Environ 19: 1609-17 (1985)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Effluent Concentrations:

Industries with mean raw wastewater concentrations >2000 ppb: gum and wood chemicals (11,000 ppb), pharmaceutical manufacturing (10,000 ppb), paint and ink formulation, and auto and other laundries(1). Effluents from representative water treatment plants in Southern California were variable <10 ppb at San Diego City to 130 ppb at Los Angeles Co (both measurements following primary treatment)(2); <10 ppb detected following secondary treatment(2). In a US city survey, 17% of 6 samples were positive, 6.0 ppb avg(3), Lake Michigan, North Side sewage treatment plant - 1 ppb(4). USEPA STORET database, 1,368 data points, 7.4% pos, <3.0 ppb median(5). MN municipal solid waste landfills, leachates, 6 sites, 100% pos, 12-820 ppb, contaminated groundwater (by inorganic indices), 13 sites, 61.5% pos, 1.2-590 ppb, other groundwater (apparently not contaminated as indicated by inorganic indices), 7 sites, 14.3% pos, 9.4 ppb avg(6). 18.0 and 12.28 kilotons of ethylbenzene was emitted as part of gasoline exhaust emissions from motor vehicles in 1987 and 1990, respectively in UK(7).
[(1) USEPA; Treatability Manual p.I.9.8-3 USEPA 600/2-82-001a (1981) (2) Young DR; 1978 Ann Rep Southern Calif Coastal Water Res Proj p 103-12 (1978) (3) Callahan MA et al; p 55-61 in 8th Natl Conf Munic Sludge Manage Proc (1979) (4) Konasewich D et al; Status Report on Organic and Heavy Metal Contaminants in Lakes Erie, Michigan, Huron and Superior basins. Great Lakes Qual Board 373 p (1979) (5) Staples CA et al; Environ Toxicol Chem 4: 131-42 (1985) (6) Sabel GV, Clark TP; Waste Manag Res 2: 119-30 (1984) (7) Field, RA et al; Atmos Environ 26A: 2983-96 (1992)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Sediment/Soil Concentrations:

SOIL: Ethylbenzene concns found in three leachate samples taken from German hazardous waste sites where leachate samples A and B were both anaerobic and alkaline and leachate sample C was aerobic and slightly acidic, were 10, 3200, and 20,000 ug/l, respectively(1). SEDIMENTS: Sediments from the lower Tennessee River below Calvert City, KY measured 4.0 ppb for ethylbenzene(2). According to the USEPA STORET database, 350 data points were tested for ethylbenzene with 11% pos, 5.0 ppm median, dry weight(3).
[(1) Brack W et al; Environ Toxicol Chem 17: 1982-91 (1998) (2) Goodley PC, Gordon M; Kentucky Acad Sci 37: 11-5 (1976) (3) Staples CA et al; Environ Technol Chem 4: 131-42 (1985)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Atmospheric Concentrations:

SOURCE DOMINATED: The ethylbenzene concn measured 0.5-2.6 ppb in the Allegheny Mt. Tunnel, with concns directly corresponding to the number of vehicles passing through the tunnel(1). Emissions testing from motor vehicle traffic in a Los Angeles roadway tunnel showed concns of 143 mg/l of ethylbenzene(2). The Maastunnel in the Netherlands measured an avg ethylbenzene concn of 6 ppb(3). Concn (ppb) a rural motorway in UK, May-Aug 1983, 184 samples, not detected-1.14, 0.17 avg(4); Aug 1982, not detected-0.70, 0.25 avg(5). Ethylbenzene ambient air concns at 2 landfill sites in Ireland were found to have a min and max of 0.03 and 5.9, median of 0.8 ug/cu m (site with no leachate collection), and 0.03 and 47.6, median of 5.3 ug/cu m (site with leachate collection), respectively(6). Houston, TX 21 individuals in urban sites reported a range of 2.5 to 154.2 ppb(8). A natural gas facility in Rio Blanco County, CO measured 3.6 ppb, and a Texaco refinery in Tulsa, OK ranged from 4.7 to 7.9 ppb(7). England - car park - 115 ppb, motorway - 92 ppb(9), while 6 sites at Gatwick airport ranged from 0.46 to 1.8 ppb, 1.4 ppb avg(10). 181 samples of US source dominated areas - 0.63 ppb avg(11).
[(1) Hampton CV et al; Environ Sci Technol 17: 699-708 (1983) (2) Fraser MP et al; Environ Sci Technol 32: 2051-60 (1998) (3) Bos R et al; Sci Total Environ 7: 269-81 (1977) (4) Clark AI et al; Sci Total Environ 39: 265-79 (1984) (5) Clark AI et al; Environ Pollut (Series B) 7: 141-58 (1984) (6) James KJ, Stack MA; Chemosphere 34: 1713-21 (1997) (7) Arnts RR, Meeks SA; Biogenic Hydrocarbon Contribution to the Ambient Air of Selected Areas 31 p USEPA 600/3-80-023 (1980) (8) Lonneman WA et al; Hydrocarbons in Houston air. USEPA 600/3-79-018 pp. 44 (1979) (9) Perry R, Twibell JD; Atmos Environ 7: 329-37 (1973) (10) Tsani-Bazaca E et al; Chemosphere 11: 11-23 (1982) (11) Brodzinsky R, Singh HB; Volatile Organic Chemicals in the Atmosphere: An Assessment of Available Data. SRI Contract 68-02-3452 pp. 198 (1982)]**PEER REVIEWED**

URBAN/SUBURBAN: Values for major western US cities ranged from 0.1 to 27.7 ppb(1,5,6,7,13), with the avg being 2.68 ppb(SRC). Representative centers in New Jersey had a range of 0.17 to 0.33 ppb avg, 107 of 110 samples pos(4). Ethylbenzene was detected but not quantified in another New Jersey study(11). It has been detected in 6 USSR cities, including Lenningrad as well as New York and Paris(8-10). The Hague, Netherlands - 5 ppb(2); Sidney Australia - 1.3 ppb(12); Japan - 0.2 ppb and Frankfurt-am-Main, Germany - 1 ppb(14). 3 sites in England away from traffic - 16.1 to 18.8 parts/trillion avg, 2 sites with heavy traffic 28.7 to 33.9 parts/trillion avg(3). 8.7 ppb measured in the atmosphere of Zurich, Switzerland(17). 669 samples from the US had a median concn of 1.2 ppb(15). 36 Chicago metropolitan area homes tested - 36% in outdoor air(16). Gas-phase concn (ng/cu m) during 7 rain events, Portland, OR, Feb-Apri 1984, 7 rain events 100% pos, 780-2800, 1300 avg(20). Concn (ppb), Exhibition Road, London, May-Aug 1983, 267 samples, 100% pos, 0.05-2.17, 0.78 avg(18); June-July 1982, 256 samples, not detected-3.3, 0.88 avg(19). US 1979-1984, 15 cities, 1-2 weeks of sampling/site, overall range, not detected-31.5 ppb; range of avg, 0.6-4-6 ppb, avg of avg, 1.9 ppb(21). Ethylbenzene outdoor air concns in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil ranged from 3.1-7.4 ug/cu m(22).
[(1) Arnts RR, Meeks SA; Biogenic Hydrocarbon Contribution to the Ambient Air of Selected Areas. pp. 31 USEPA 600/3-80-023 (1980) (2) Bos R et al; Sci Total Environ 7: 269-81 (1977) (3) Thornburn S, Colenutt BA; Int J Environ Stud 13: 265-71 (1979) (4) Harkov R et al; J Air Pollut Control Assoc 33: 1177-83 (1983) (5) Altshuller AP et al; Environ Sci Technol 5: 1009-16 (1971) (6) Lonneman WA et al; Environ Sci Technol 2: 1017-20 (1968) (7) Singh HB et al; Atmos Environ 15: 601-12 (1981) (8) Ioffe BV et al; Dokl Akad Nauk SSSR 243: 1186-9 (1978) (9) Ioffe BV et al; Environ Sci Technol 13: 864-8 (1979) (10) Ioffe BV et al; J Chromatogr 142: 787-95 (1977) (11) Lioy P et al; J Water Pollut Control Fed 33: 649-57 (1983) (12) Nelson PF, Quigley SM; Atmos Environ 17: 659-62 (1983) (13) Singh HB et al; Atmospheric Measurements of Selected Toxic Organic Chemicals. USEPA 600/3-80-072 (1980) (14) Santodonato J et al; Investigation of Selected Potential Environmental Contaminants; Styrene, Ethyl Benzene and Related Compounds. pp. 261 USEPA 560/11-80-018 (1980) (15) Brodzinsky R, Singh HB; Volatile Organic Chemicals in the Atmosphere: An Assessment of Available Data 198 p SRI Contract 68-02-3452 (1982) (16) Jarke FH et al; ASHRAE Trans 87: 153-66 (1981) (17) Grob K, Grob g; J Chromatogr 62: 1-13 (1971) (18) Clark AI et al; Sci Total Environ 39: 265-79 (1984) (19) Clark AI et al; Environ Pollut (Series B) 7: 141-58 (1984) (20) Ligocki MP et al; Atmos Environ 19: 1609-17 (1985) (21) Singh HB et al; Atmos Environ 19: 1911-9 (1985) (22) Brickus LSR et al; Environ Sci Technol 32: 3485-90 (1998)]**PEER REVIEWED**

RURAL/REMOTE: Concentration in air sampls from rural and remote areas in the continental US ranged between 0.5 to 2.2 ppb(1,6). Samples from the Jones State Forest north of Houston, TX ranged from 0.8 to 10.4 ppb(3). Air intake in fan rooms of the Allegheny Mt. tunnel measured 0.07 to 0.16 ppb(2). Air samples in England - 11.3 parts/trillion avg(4); the Netherlands - 0.8 ppb avg; and Belgium 0.01 to 15 ppb(5). Concn at rural site in the UK, May-Aug 1983, 204 samples, not detected-0.70, 0.14 ppb avg(7); July 1982, 175 samples, not detected-0.6, 0.12 ppb avg(8).
[(1) Arnts RR, Meeks SA; Biogenic Hydrocarbon Contribution to the Ambient Air of Selected Areas. USEPA 600/3-80-023 pp. 31 (1980) (2) Hampton CV et al; Environ Sci Technol 17: 699-708 (1983) (3) Seila RL; Non-Urban Hydrocarbon Concentrations in Ambient Air North of Houston, TX. USEPA 500/3-79-010 pp. 38 (1979) (4) Thornburn S, Colenutt BA; Int J Environ Stud 13: 265-71 (1979) (5) Termonia M; pp. 356-61 in Comm Eur Comm EUR7624 Phys Chem Behav Atmos Pollut (1982) (6) Brodzinsky R, Singh HB; Volatile Organic Chemicals in the Atmosphere: An Assessment of Available Data. SRI Contract 68-02-3452 pp. 198 (1982) (7) Clark AI et al; Sci Total Environ 39: 265-79 (1984) (8) Clark AI et al; Environ Pollut (Series B) 7: 141-58 (1984)]**PEER REVIEWED**

RURAL/REMOTE: Between May-Aug 1983, 204 samples of air were tested for ethylbenzene at a rural site in UK and it was found that the sample concn ranged between not detected to 0.70 ppb, with an avg of 0.14 ppb(1). In July 1982, 175 samples from rural UK ranged between not detected to 0.6 ppb, with an avg of 0.12 ppb(2).
[(1) Clark AI et al; Sci Total Environ 39: 265-79 (1984) (2) Clark AI et al; Environ Pollut (Series B) 7: 141-58 (1984)]**PEER REVIEWED**

INDOOR: Ethylbenzene indoor air concns in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil ranged from 9.3-13.1 ug/cu m. samples from 36 Chicago metropolitan area homes tested showed a 57% detection frequency in indoor air(2).
[(1) Brickus LSR et al; Environ Sci Technol 32: 3485-90 (1998) (2) Jarke FH et al; ASHRAE Trans 87: 153-66 (1981)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Food Survey Values:

Ethylbenzene concns in supermarket eggs packed in polystyrene, fresh unpacked eggs, and fresh eggs packed in polystyrene were found to be 28, 4, and 4 ng/g, respectively(1). Duck meat, duck fat, cantonese style roasted duck, and cantonese style roasted duck gravy had concns of 0.47, 2.55, 4.07, and 12.30 ppb ethylbenzene, respectively(2). Ethylbenzene was detected but not quantified in mountain Beaufort cheese(3). Ethylbenzene was detected in dried legumes such as beans with a 5 ppb avg concn, in split peas at 13 ppb, and in lentils at a 5 ppb concn(4).
[(1) Matiella JE, Hsieh TCKY; J Food Sci 56: 387-90 (1991) (2) Wu CM, Liou SE; J Agric Food Chem 40: 838-41 (1992) (3) Dumont JP, Adda J; J Agric Food Chem 26: 364-7 (1978) (4) Lovegren NV et al; J Agric Food Chem 27: 851-3 (1979)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Fish/Seafood Concentrations:

In 1982, bottomfish (sole and flounder species) from Commencement Bay and adjacent waterways in Tacoma, WA were found to have an avg concn of ethylbenzene of 0.01 ppm(1). 5 samples of oysters in Lake Pontchartrain, LA, had an avg concn of 0.8 ppb(2).
[(1) Nicola RM; J Environ Health 49: 342-7 (1987) (2) Ferrario JB et al; Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 34: 246-55 (1985)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Milk Concentrations:

Ethylbenzene was detected, but not quantified, in 8 of 8 samples of mother's milk from 4 US urban areas(1).
[(1) Pellizzari ED et al; Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 28: 322-8 (1982)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Other Environmental Concentrations:

Detected in cigarette smoke(1).
[(1) NAS; The Alkylbenzenes USEPA Contract No. 68-01-4655 (1980)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Environmental Standards & Regulations:

Acceptable Daily Intakes:

Acceptable daily intake: 1.6 mg/day
[USEPA; Ambient Water Quality Criteria Doc: Ethylbenzene p.C-22 (1980) EPA 440/5-80-048]**PEER REVIEWED**

TSCA Requirements:

Pursuant to section 8(d) of TSCA, EPA promulgated a model Health and Safety Data Reporting Rule. The section 8(d) model rule requires manufacturers, importers, and processors of listed chemical substances and mixtures to submit to EPA copies and lists of unpublished health and safety studies. Ethylbenzene is included on this list.
[40 CFR 716.120 (7/1/99)]**PEER REVIEWED**

CERCLA Reportable Quantities:

Persons in charge of vessels or facilities are required to notify the National Response Center (NRC) immediately, when there is a release of this designated hazardous substance, in an amount equal to or greater than its reportable quantity of 1000 lb or 454 kg. The toll free number of the NRC is (800) 424-8802; In the Washington D.C. metropolitan area (202) 426-2675. The rule for determining when notification is required is stated in 40 CFR 302.4 (section IV. D.3.b).
[40 CFR 302.4 (7/1/99)]**PEER REVIEWED**

RCRA Requirements:

F003; When ethylbenzene is a spent solvent, it is classified as a hazardous waste from a nonspecific source (F003), as stated in 40 CFR 261.31, and must be managed according to State and/or Federal hazardous waste regulations.
[40 CFR 261.31 (7/1/99)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Atmospheric Standards:

This action promulgates standards of performance for equipment leaks of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) in the Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry (SOCMI). The intended effect of these standards is to require all newly constructed, modified, and reconstructed SOCMI process units to use the best demonstrated system of continuous emission reduction for equipment leaks of VOC, considering costs, non air quality health and environmental impact and energy requirements. Ethylbenzene is produced, as an intermediate or a final product, by process units covered under this subpart.
[40 CFR 60.489 (7/1/99)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Listed as a hazardous air pollutant (HAP) generally known or suspected to cause serious health problems. The Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990, directs EPA to set standards requiring major sources to sharply reduce routine emissions of toxic pollutants. EPA is required to establish and phase in specific performance based standards for all air emission sources that emit one or more of the listed pollutants. Ethylbenzene is included on this list.
[Clean Air Act as amended in 1990, Sect. 112 (b) (1) Public Law 101-549 Nov. 15, 1990]**PEER REVIEWED**

Clean Water Act Requirements:

Toxic pollutant designated pursuant to section 307(a)(1) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act and is subject to effluent limitations.
[40 CFR 401.15 (7/1/99)]**QC REVIEWED**

Ethylbenzene is designated as a hazardous substance under section 311(b)(2)(A) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act and further regulated by the Clean Water Act Amendments of 1977 and 1978. These regulations apply to discharges of this substance. This designation includes any isomers and hydrates, as well as any solutions and mixtures containing this substance.
[40 CFR 116.4 (7/1/99)]**QC REVIEWED**

For the protection of human health from the toxic properties of ethylbenzene ... the ambient water criterion is determined to be 1.4 mg/l.
[USEPA; Quality Criteria for Water 1986: Ethylbenzene (May 1,1986) EPA 440/5-86-001]**QC REVIEWED**

The maximum contaminant level (MCL) set forth by the National Revised Primary Drinking Water Regulations for the organic contaminant ethylbenzene in community and non-transient, non-community water systems is 0.7 mg/l.
[40 CFR 141.61 (7/1/99)]**QC REVIEWED**

Federal Drinking Water Standards:

EPA 700 ug/l
[USEPA/Office of Water; Federal-State Toxicology and Risk Analysis Committee (FSTRAC). Summary of State and Federal Drinking Water Standards and Guidelines (11/93)]**QC REVIEWED**

Federal Drinking Water Guidelines:

EPA 700 ug/l
[USEPA/Office of Water; Federal-State Toxicology and Risk Analysis Committee (FSTRAC). Summary of State and Federal Drinking Water Standards and Guidelines (11/93)]**QC REVIEWED**

State Drinking Water Guidelines:

(AZ) ARIZONA 680 ug/l
[USEPA/Office of Water; Federal-State Toxicology and Risk Analysis Committee (FSTRAC). Summary of State and Federal Drinking Water Standards and Guidelines (11/93)]**QC REVIEWED**

(FL) FLORIDA 30 ug/l
[USEPA/Office of Water; Federal-State Toxicology and Risk Analysis Committee (FSTRAC). Summary of State and Federal Drinking Water Standards and Guidelines (11/93)]**QC REVIEWED**

(ME) MAINE 700 ug/l
[USEPA/Office of Water; Federal-State Toxicology and Risk Analysis Committee (FSTRAC). Summary of State and Federal Drinking Water Standards and Guidelines (11/93)]**QC REVIEWED**

(MN) MINNESOTA 700 ug/l
[USEPA/Office of Water; Federal-State Toxicology and Risk Analysis Committee (FSTRAC). Summary of State and Federal Drinking Water Standards and Guidelines (11/93)]**QC REVIEWED**

Chemical/Physical Properties:

Molecular Formula:

C8-H10
**PEER REVIEWED**

Molecular Weight:

106.16
[Budavari, S. (ed.). The Merck Index - An Encyclopedia of Chemicals, Drugs, and Biologicals. Whitehouse Station, NJ: Merck and Co., Inc., 1996.643]**PEER REVIEWED**

Color/Form:

Colorless liquid
[Lewis, R.J., Sr (Ed.). Hawley's Condensed Chemical Dictionary. 13th ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1997. 461]**PEER REVIEWED**

Odor:

Aromatic odor
[Lewis, R.J., Sr (Ed.). Hawley's Condensed Chemical Dictionary. 13th ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1997. 461]**PEER REVIEWED**

Pungent odor
[Clayton, G.D., F.E. Clayton (eds.) Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology. Volumes 2A, 2B, 2C, 2D, 2E, 2F: Toxicology. 4th ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1993-1994.1342]**PEER REVIEWED**

SWEET, GASOLINE-LIKE ODOR
[U.S. Coast Guard, Department of Transportation. CHRIS - Hazardous Chemical Data. Volume II. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1984-5.]**PEER REVIEWED**

Boiling Point:

136.1 deg C
[Lide, D.R. (ed.). CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 79th ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press Inc., 1998-1999. 3-47]**PEER REVIEWED**

Melting Point:

-94.9 deg C
[Lide, D.R. (ed.). CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 79th ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press Inc., 1998-1999. 3-47]**PEER REVIEWED**

Critical Temperature & Pressure:

Critical temperature = 617.15 K; critical pressure = 3.6X10+6 Pa
[Daubert, T.E., R.P. Danner. Physical and Thermodynamic Properties of Pure Chemicals Data Compilation. Washington, D.C.: Taylor and Francis, 1989.]**PEER REVIEWED**

Density/Specific Gravity:

0.8670 @ 20 deg C/4 deg C
[Lide, D.R. (ed.). CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 79th ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press Inc., 1998-1999. 3-47]**PEER REVIEWED**

Heat of Combustion:

-17,780 BTU/lb= -9877 cal/g= -413.5x10+5 J/kg
[U.S. Coast Guard, Department of Transportation. CHRIS - Hazardous Chemical Data. Volume II. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1984-5.]**PEER REVIEWED**

Heat of Vaporization:

4.8X10+7 J/kmol @ 178.20 K
[Daubert, T.E., R.P. Danner. Physical and Thermodynamic Properties of Pure Chemicals Data Compilation. Washington, D.C.: Taylor and Francis, 1989.]**PEER REVIEWED**

Octanol/Water Partition Coefficient:

log Kow= 3.15
[Hansch, C., Leo, A., D. Hoekman. Exploring QSAR - Hydrophobic, Electronic, and Steric Constants. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society., 1995.43]**PEER REVIEWED**

Solubilities:

SOL IN ALL PROPORTIONS IN ETHYL ALCOHOL AND ETHYL ETHER
[International Labour Office. Encyclopedia of Occupational Health and Safety. Vols. I&II. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Office, 1983.2114]**PEER REVIEWED**

SOLUBILITY IN WATER @ 15 DEG C, 0.014 G/100 ML
[Patty, F. (ed.). Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology: Volume II: Toxicology. 2nd ed. New York: Interscience Publishers, 1963.1223]**PEER REVIEWED**

Miscible with the usual organic solvents.
[Budavari, S. (ed.). The Merck Index - An Encyclopedia of Chemicals, Drugs, and Biologicals. Whitehouse Station, NJ: Merck and Co., Inc., 1996.643]**PEER REVIEWED**

Soluble in alcohol, benzene, carbon tetrachloride, and ether.
[Lewis, R.J., Sr (Ed.). Hawley's Condensed Chemical Dictionary. 13th ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1997. 461]**PEER REVIEWED**

Slight soluble in chloroform; miscible in ethanol and ethyl ether.
[Lide, D.R. (ed.). CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 79th ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press Inc., 1998-1999. 3-47]**PEER REVIEWED**

In water, 169 mg/l @ 25 deg C
[Sanemasa I et al; Bull Chem Soc Japan 55: 1054-62 (1982)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Insol in ammonia; sol in SO2.
[Lewis, R.J. Sax's Dangerous Properties of Industrial Materials. 9th ed. Volumes 1-3. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1996.1522]**PEER REVIEWED**

Spectral Properties:

SADTLER REF NUMBER: 246 (IR, PRISM); 82 (IR, GRATING)
[Weast, R.C. (ed.). Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 60th ed. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press Inc., 1979.C-165]**PEER REVIEWED**

IR: 4779 (Coblentz Society Spectral Collection)
[Weast, R.C. and M.J. Astle. CRC Handbook of Data on Organic Compounds. Volumes I and II. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press Inc. 1985.V1 613]**PEER REVIEWED**

UV: 97 (Sadtler Research Laboratories Spectral Collection)
[Weast, R.C. and M.J. Astle. CRC Handbook of Data on Organic Compounds. Volumes I and II. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press Inc. 1985.V1 613]**PEER REVIEWED**

NMR: 505 (Varian Associates NMR Spectra Catalogue)
[Weast, R.C. and M.J. Astle. CRC Handbook of Data on Organic Compounds. Volumes I and II. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press Inc. 1985.V1 613]**PEER REVIEWED**

MASS: 322 (Atlas of Mass Spectral Data, John Wiley & Sons, New York)
[Weast, R.C. and M.J. Astle. CRC Handbook of Data on Organic Compounds. Volumes I and II. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press Inc. 1985.V1 613]**PEER REVIEWED**

Index of refraction: 1.4959 at 20 deg C/D
[Lide, D.R. (ed.). CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 79th ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press Inc., 1998-1999. 3-47]**PEER REVIEWED**

Surface Tension:

4.3 N/m @ 178.20 K
[Daubert, T.E., R.P. Danner. Physical and Thermodynamic Properties of Pure Chemicals Data Compilation. Washington, D.C.: Taylor and Francis, 1989.]**PEER REVIEWED**

Vapor Density:

3.66 (Air= 1)
[Sax, N.I. Dangerous Properties of Industrial Materials. Vol 1-3 7th ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1989.1601]**PEER REVIEWED**

Vapor Pressure:

9.6 mm Hg @ 25 deg C
[Daubert, T.E., R.P. Danner. Physical and Thermodynamic Properties of Pure Chemicals Data Compilation. Washington, D.C.: Taylor and Francis, 1989.]**PEER REVIEWED**

Relative Evaporation Rate:

IT EVAPORATES ABOUT 94 TIMES MORE SLOWLY THAN ETHER
[Clayton, G.D., F.E. Clayton (eds.) Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology. Volumes 2A, 2B, 2C, 2D, 2E, 2F: Toxicology. 4th ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1993-1994.1342]**PEER REVIEWED**

Viscosity:

0.64 cP @ 25 deg C
[Lewis, R.J., Sr (Ed.). Hawley's Condensed Chemical Dictionary. 13th ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1997. 461]**PEER REVIEWED**

Other Chemical/Physical Properties:

DENSITY OF SATURATED VAPOR-AIR MIXTURE AT 760 MM HG (AIR= 1): 1.03 (26 DEG C); SPECIFIC DISPERSION: 174.6
[Patty, F. (ed.). Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology: Volume II: Toxicology. 2nd ed. New York: Interscience Publishers, 1963.1223]**PEER REVIEWED**

CONVERSION FACTORS: 1 MG/L IS EQUIVALENT TO 230 PPM, 1 PPM IS EQUIVALENT TO 4.35 MG/CU M AT 25 DEG C, 760 MM HG
[Patty, F. (ed.). Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology: Volume II: Toxicology. 2nd ed. New York: Interscience Publishers, 1963.1231]**PEER REVIEWED**

Specific heat: 0.41 cal/gal/K
[Lewis, R.J., Sr (Ed.). Hawley's Condensed Chemical Dictionary. 13th ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1997. 461]**PEER REVIEWED**

Liquid-water interfacial tension: 35.48 dynes/cm= 0.03548 N/m @ 20 deg C
[U.S. Coast Guard, Department of Transportation. CHRIS - Hazardous Chemical Data. Volume II. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1984-5.]**PEER REVIEWED**

Ratio of Specific Heats of Vapor (gas): 1.071
[U.S. Coast Guard, Department of Transportation. CHRIS - Hazardous Chemical Data. Volume II. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1984-5.]**PEER REVIEWED**

Heats of transition, J/(mol.K): fusion 9.164; formation @ 25 deg C: -12.456; entropy of formation 255.2
[Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology. 4th ed. Volumes 1: New York, NY. John Wiley and Sons, 1991-Present.V5 833]**PEER REVIEWED**

Cricital density: 2.67 mmol/cu m; critical volume: 374.0 cu m/mol
[Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology. 4th ed. Volumes 1: New York, NY. John Wiley and Sons, 1991-Present.V25 833]**PEER REVIEWED**

Viscosity: 0.678 mPas (20 deg C)
[Environment Canada; Tech Info for Problem Spills: Ethylbenzene p.4 (1981)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Ionization potential: 8.76 eV
[Environment Canada; Tech Info for Problem Spills: Ethylbenzene p.4 (1981)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Flame speed: 0.35 m/s
[Environment Canada; Tech Info for Problem Spills: Ethylbenzene p.2 (1981)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Partition coefficients at 37 deg C for ethylbenzene into blood= 28.4; into oil= 3,790.
[Sato A, Nakajima T; Scand J Work Environ Health 13: 81-93 (1987)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Henry's Law constant= 7.88X10-3 atm-cu m/mol @ 25 deg C
[Sanemasa I et al; Bull Chem Soc Japan 55: 1054-62 (1982)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Hydroxyl radical rate constant= 7.10X10-12 cu m/molecule-sec @ 25 deg C
[Atkinson R; J Phys Chem Ref Data Monograph No. 2 p. 48 (1994)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Chemical Safety & Handling:

DOT Emergency Guidelines:

Fire or explosion: Highly flammable: Will be easily ignited by heat, sparks or flames. Vapors may form explosive mixtures with air. Vapors may travel to source of ignition and flash back. Most vapors are heavier than air. They will spread along ground and collect in low confined areas (sewers, basements, tanks). Vapor explosion hazard indoors, outdoors or in sewers. Those substances labeled "P" may polymerize explosively when heated or involved in a fire. Runoff to sewer may create fire or explosion hazard. Containers may explode when heated. Many liquids are lighter than water.
[U.S. Department of Transportation. 2000 Emergency Response Guidebook. RSPA P 5800.8 Edition. Washington, D.C: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2000,p. G-129]**QC REVIEWED**

Health: May cause toxic effects if inhaled or absorbed through skin. Inhalation or contact with material may irritate or burn skin and eyes. Fire will produce irritating, corrosive and/or toxic gases. Vapors may cause dizziness or suffocation. Runoff from fire control or dilution water may cause pollution.
[U.S. Department of Transportation. 2000 Emergency Response Guidebook. RSPA P 5800.8 Edition. Washington, D.C: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2000,p. G-129]**QC REVIEWED**

Public safety: Call Emergency Response Telephone Number. ... Isolate spill or leak area immediately for at least 50 to lOO meters (160 to 330 feet) in all directions. Keep unauthorized personnel away. Stay upwind. Keep out of low areas. Ventilate closed spaces before entering.
[U.S. Department of Transportation. 2000 Emergency Response Guidebook. RSPA P 5800.8 Edition. Washington, D.C: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2000,p. G-129]**QC REVIEWED**

Protective clothing: Wear positive pressure self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA). Structural firefighters' protective clothing will only provide limited protection.
[U.S. Department of Transportation. 2000 Emergency Response Guidebook. RSPA P 5800.8 Edition. Washington, D.C: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2000,p. G-129]**QC REVIEWED**

Evacuation: ... Fire: If tank, rail car or tank truck is involved in a fire, isolate for 800 meters (1/2 mile) in all directions; also, consider initial evacuation for 800 meters (1/2 mile) in all directions.
[U.S. Department of Transportation. 2000 Emergency Response Guidebook. RSPA P 5800.8 Edition. Washington, D.C: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2000,p. G-129]**QC REVIEWED**

Fire: Caution: All these products have a very low flash point: Use of water spray when fighting fire may be inefficient. Small fires: Dry chemical, CO2, water spray or alcohol-resistant foam. Do not use dry chemical extinguishers to control fires involving nitromethane or nitroethane. Large fires: Water spray, fog or alcohol-resistant foam. Do not use straight streams. Move containers from fire area if you can do it without risk. Fire involving tanks or car/trailer loads: Fight fire from maximum distance or use unmanned hose holders or monitor nozzles. Cool containers with flooding quantities of water until well after fire is out. Withdraw immediately in case of rising sound from venting safety devices or discoloration of tank. Always stay away from tanks engulfed in fire. For massive fire, use unmanned hose holders or monitor nozzles; if this is impossible, withdraw from area and let fire burn.
[U.S. Department of Transportation. 2000 Emergency Response Guidebook. RSPA P 5800.8 Edition. Washington, D.C: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2000,p. G-129]**QC REVIEWED**

Spill or leak: Eliminate all ignition sources (no smoking, flares, sparks or flames in immediate area). All equipment used when handling the product must be grounded. Do not touch or walk through spilled material. Stop leak if you can do it without risk. Prevent entry into waterways, sewers, basements or confined areas. A vapor suppressing foam may be used to reduce vapors. Absorb or cover with dry earth, sand or other non-combustible material and transfer to containers. Use clean non-sparking tools to collect absorbed material. Large spills: Dike far ahead of liquid spill for later disposal. Water spray may reduce vapor; but may not prevent ignition in closed spaces.
[U.S. Department of Transportation. 2000 Emergency Response Guidebook. RSPA P 5800.8 Edition. Washington, D.C: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2000,p. G-129]**QC REVIEWED**

First aid: Move victim to fresh air. Call 911 or emergency medical service. Apply artificial respiration if victim is not breathing. Administer oxygen if breathing is difficult. Remove and isolate contaminated clothing and shoes. In case of contact with substance, immediately flush skin or eyes with running water for at least 20 minutes. Wash skin with soap and water. Keep victim warm and quiet. Effects of exposure (inhalation, ingestion or skin contact) to substance may be delayed. Ensure that medical personnel are aware of the material(s) involved, and take precautions to protect themselves.
[U.S. Department of Transportation. 2000 Emergency Response Guidebook. RSPA P 5800.8 Edition. Washington, D.C: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2000,p. G-129]**QC REVIEWED**

Odor Threshold:

140 ppm /Purity not specified/
[U.S. Coast Guard, Department of Transportation. CHRIS - Hazardous Chemical Data. Volume II. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1984-5.]**PEER REVIEWED**

2-2.6 mg/cu m; detection: 0.4 mg/cu m /Purity not specified/
[Verschueren, K. Handbook of Environmental Data on Organic Chemicals. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1996.944]**PEER REVIEWED**

Odor Low: 8.7 mg/cu m, Odor High: 870.0 mg/cu m
[Ruth JH; Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 47: A-142-51 (1986)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Skin, Eye and Respiratory Irritations:

... CHARACTERIZED ... AS MOST SEVERE IRRITANT OF THE BENZENE SERIES.
[American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices. 5th ed. Cincinnati, OH: American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 1986.244]**PEER REVIEWED**

A concn of 200 ppm causes eye irritation. A concn of 100 ppm for 8 hr caused irritative effects in a human.
[Cleland, J.G., G.L. Kingsbury. Multimedia Environmental Goals for Environmental Assessment. Volume 1. EPA-600/7-77-136a. Research Triangle Park, NC: EPA, Nov. 1977.E-148]**PEER REVIEWED**

EXPOSURE TO CONCN OF 5000 PPM /24.6 MG/L/ ... CAUSES INTOLERABLE IRRITATION OF EYES, MUCOUS MEMBRANES & NOSE.
[Patty, F. (ed.). Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology: Volume II: Toxicology. 2nd ed. New York: Interscience Publishers, 1963.1232]**PEER REVIEWED**

HAZARD WARNING: ... exposure to 21.5 g/cu m (5000 ppm) ethylbenzene for a few seconds gives intolerable irritation of nose, eyes, and throat.
[Environmental Health Criteria 186: Ethylbenzene pp. 67 (1996) by the International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS) under the joint sponsorship of the United Nations Environment Programme, the International Labour Organisation and the World Health Organization.]**QC REVIEWED**

Fire Potential:

A very dangerous fire ... hazard when exposed to heat or flame ...
[Lewis, R.J. Sax's Dangerous Properties of Industrial Materials. 9th ed. Volumes 1-3. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1996.1522]**PEER REVIEWED**

Electrical ignition hazard: May be ignited by static discharge.
[Environment Canada; Tech Info for Problem Spills: Ethylbenzene (Draft) p.4 (1982)]**PEER REVIEWED**

NFPA Hazard Classification:

Health: 2. 2= Materials that, on intense or continued (but not chronic) exposure, could cause temporary incapacitation or possible residual injury, including those requiring the use of respiratory protective equipment that has an independent air supply. These materials are hazardous to health, but areas may be entered freely if personnel are provided with full-face mask self-contained breathing apparatus that provides complete eye protection.
[Fire Protection Guide to Hazardous Materials. 12 ed. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association, 1997. 325-48]**PEER REVIEWED**

Flammability: 3. 3= This degree includes Class IB and IC flammable liquids and materials that can be easily ignited under almost all normal temperature conditions. Water may be ineffective in controlling or extinguishing fires in such materials.
[Fire Protection Guide to Hazardous Materials. 12 ed. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association, 1997. 325-48]**PEER REVIEWED**

Reactivity: 0. 0= This degree includes materials that are normally stable, even under fire exposure conditions, and that do not react with water. Normal fire fighting procedures may be used.
[Fire Protection Guide to Hazardous Materials. 12 ed. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association, 1997. 325-48]**PEER REVIEWED**

Flammable Limits:

Lower flammable limit: 0.8% by volume; Upper flammable limit: 6.7% by volume
[Fire Protection Guide to Hazardous Materials. 12 ed. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association, 1997. 325-48]**PEER REVIEWED**

Flash Point:

12.8 DEG C (55 DEG F) (CLOSED CUP)
[Clayton, G.D., F.E. Clayton (eds.) Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology. Volumes 2A, 2B, 2C, 2D, 2E, 2F: Toxicology. 4th ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1993-1994.1304]**PEER REVIEWED**

Autoignition Temperature:

810 DEG F
[Lewis, R.J. Sax's Dangerous Properties of Industrial Materials. 9th ed. Volumes 1-3. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1996.1522]**PEER REVIEWED**

Fire Fighting Procedures:

Approach fire from upwind to avoid hazardous vapors and toxic decomposition products. Use water spray, dry chemical, foam, or carbon dioxide. Use water spray to keep fire-exposed containers cool.
[Fire Protection Guide to Hazardous Materials. 12 ed. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association, 1997. 49-65]**PEER REVIEWED**

If material on fire or involved in fire: Do not extinguish fire unless flow can be stopped or safely confined. Use water in flooding quantities as fog. Solid streams of water may spread fire. Cool all affected containers with flooding quantities of water. Apply water from as far a distance as possible. Use foam, carbon dioxide, or dry chemical.
[Association of American Railroads. Emergency Handling of Hazardous Materials in Surface Transportation. Washington, DC: Association of American Railroads, Bureau of Explosives, 1994.443]**PEER REVIEWED**

Toxic Combustion Products:

Irritating vapors are generated when heated.
[U.S. Coast Guard, Department of Transportation. CHRIS - Hazardous Chemical Data. Volume II. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1984-5.]**PEER REVIEWED**

The combustion products of ethylbenzene are water and carbon dioxide or carbon monoxide in limited oxygen atmospheres.
[Environment Canada; Tech Info for Problem Spills: Ethylbenzene (Draft) p.79 (1982)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Compounds identified in tars produced by the pyrolysis of ethylbenzene include the following suspected carcinogens: 1-benzanthracene, benzene, benzofluoranthene, 10,11-benzofluoranthene, 12-benzofluoranthene, 1-benzofluoranthene, 1-benzopyrene, 3,4-benzopyrene, chrysene, and 1,2:5,6-dibenzanthracene.
[NAS; The Alkylbenzenes p.99 (1981)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Firefighting Hazards:

Vapors are heavier than air and may travel to a source of ignition and flash back. Liquid floats on water and may travel to a source of ignition and spread fire.
[Fire Protection Guide to Hazardous Materials. 12 ed. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association, 1997. 49-65]**PEER REVIEWED**

Explosive Limits & Potential:

Vapors form explosive mixtures with air.
[Fire Protection Guide to Hazardous Materials. 12 ed. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association, 1997. 49-65]**PEER REVIEWED**

Lower explosive limit= 1.2%. Upper explosive limit= 6.8%.
[Lewis, R.J. Sax's Dangerous Properties of Industrial Materials. 9th ed. Volumes 1-3. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1996.1522]**PEER REVIEWED**

Hazardous Reactivities & Incompatibilities:

Incompatibilities: Strong oxidizers.
[Sittig, M. Handbook of Toxic and Hazardous Chemicals and Carcinogens, 1985. 2nd ed. Park Ridge, NJ: Noyes Data Corporation, 1985.4122]**PEER REVIEWED**

... Can react vigorously with oxidizing materials.
[Lewis, R.J. Sax's Dangerous Properties of Industrial Materials. 9th ed. Volumes 1-3. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1996.1522]**PEER REVIEWED**

Strong oxidizers.
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997.132]**PEER REVIEWED**

Hazardous Decomposition:

When heated to decomposition it emits acrid smoke and irritating fumes.
[Lewis, R.J. Sax's Dangerous Properties of Industrial Materials. 9th ed. Volumes 1-3. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1996.1522]**PEER REVIEWED**

Immediately Dangerous to Life or Health:

800 ppm
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997.132]**PEER REVIEWED**

Protective Equipment & Clothing:

Wear full protective clothing and positive pressure self-contained breathing apparatus.
[Fire Protection Guide to Hazardous Materials. 12 ed. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association, 1997. 49-65]**PEER REVIEWED**

Rubber overclothing (including gloves)
[U.S. Coast Guard, Department of Transportation. CHRIS - Hazardous Chemical Data. Volume II. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1984-5.]**PEER REVIEWED**

Wear appropriate personal protective clothing to prevent skin contact.
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997.132]**PEER REVIEWED**

Wear appropriate eye protection to prevent eye contact.
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997.132]**PEER REVIEWED**

Recommendations for respirator selection. Max concn for use: 800 ppm. Respirator Class(es): Any chemical cartridge respirator with organic vapor cartridge(s). May require eye protection. Any air-purifying, full-facepiece respirator (gas mask) with a chin-style, front- or back-mounted organic vapor canister. Any powered, air-purifying respirator with organic vapor cartridge(s). May require eye protection. Any supplied-air respirator. May require eye protection. Any self-contained breathing apparatus with a full facepiece.
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997.132]**PEER REVIEWED**

Recommendations for respirator selection. Condition: Emergency or planned entry into unknown concn or IDLH conditions: Respirator Class(es): Any self-contained breathing apparatus that has a full facepiece and is operated in a pressure-demand or other positive-pressure mode. Any supplied-air respirator that has a full facepiece and is operated in a pressure-demand or other positive-pressure mode in combination with an auxiliary self-contained breathing apparatus operated in pressure-demand or other positive-pressure mode.
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997.132]**PEER REVIEWED**

Recommendations for respirator selection. Condition: Escape from suddenly occurring respiratory hazards: Respirator Class(es): Any air-purifying, full-facepiece respirator (gas mask) with a chin-style, front- or back-mounted organic vapor canister. Any appropriate escape-type, self-contained breathing apparatus.
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997.132]**PEER REVIEWED**

Preventive Measures:

Contact lenses should not be worn when working with this chemical.
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997.132]**PEER REVIEWED**

SRP: The scientific literature for the use of contact lenses in industry is conflicting. The benefit or detrimental effects of wearing contact lenses depend not only upon the substance, but also on factors including the form of the substance, characteristics and duration of the exposure, the uses of other eye protection equipment, and the hygiene of the lenses. However, there may be individual substances whose irritating or corrosive properties are such that the wearing of contact lenses would be harmful to the eye. In those specific cases, contact lenses should not be worn. In any event, the usual eye protection equipment should be worn even when contact lenses are in place.
**PEER REVIEWED**

Employees should wash promptly when skin is wet or contaminated. Remove clothing immediately if wet or contaminated to avoid flammability hazard.
[Sittig, M. Handbook of Toxic and Hazardous Chemicals and Carcinogens, 1985. 2nd ed. Park Ridge, NJ: Noyes Data Corporation, 1985.414]**PEER REVIEWED**

BEFORE WORKERS ARE ALLOWED TO ENTER A REACTION VESSEL ... THE VESSEL SHOULD BE PURGED AND WELL VENTILATED. PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT SHOULD BE SUPPLIED ...
[International Labour Office. Encyclopedia of Occupational Health and Safety. Vols. I&II. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Office, 1983.2114]**PEER REVIEWED**

... SUBSTITUTION OF LESS IRRITATING SUBSTANCES, ... REDESIGN OF OPERATIONS, ... PREVENT CONTACT, PROVISION OF A PHYSICAL BARRIER AGAINST CONTACT, PROPER WASHING FACILITIES, PROPER WORK CLOTHING AND STORAGE FACILITIES, PROTECTIVE CLOTHING, BARRIER CREAMS, AND MEDICAL CONTROL ...
[Sax, N.I. Dangerous Properties of Industrial Materials. 4th ed. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1975.727]**PEER REVIEWED**

Personnel protection: Avoid breathing vapors. Keep upwind. ... Do not handle broken packages without protective equipment. Wash away any material which may have contacted the body with copious amounts of water or soap and water.
[Association of American Railroads. Emergency Handling of Hazardous Materials in Surface Transportation. Washington, DC: Association of American Railroads, Bureau of Explosives, 1994.443]**PEER REVIEWED**

COMBUSTION MAY BE IMPROVED BY MIXING WITH MORE FLAMMABLE LIQ. ... SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO ENTER CONFINED SPACE, SUCH AS SEWER, BECAUSE OF POSSIBILITY OF EXPLOSION.
[Mackison, F. W., R. S. Stricoff, and L. J. Partridge, Jr. (eds.). NIOSH/OSHA - Occupational Health Guidelines for Chemical Hazards. DHHS(NIOSH) Publication No. 81-123 (3 VOLS). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, Jan. 1981.2]**PEER REVIEWED**

If material not on fire and not involved in fire: Keep sparks, flames, and other sources of ignition away. Keep material out of water sources and sewers. Build dikes to contain flow as necessary. Attempt to stop leak if without hazard. Use water spray to knock-down vapors.
[Association of American Railroads. Emergency Handling of Hazardous Materials in Surface Transportation. Washington, DC: Association of American Railroads, Bureau of Explosives, 1994.443]**PEER REVIEWED**

The worker should immediately wash the skin when it becomes contaminated.
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997.132]**PEER REVIEWED**

Work clothing that becomes wet should be immediately removed due to its flammability hazard.
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997.132]**PEER REVIEWED**

Shipment Methods and Regulations:

No person may /transport,/ offer or accept a hazardous material for transportation in commerce unless that person is registered in conformance ... and the hazardous material is properly classed, described, packaged, marked, labeled, and in condition for shipment as required or authorized by ... /the hazardous materials regulations (49 CFR 171-177)./
[49 CFR 171.2 (7/1/99)]**PEER REVIEWED**

The International Air Transport Association (IATA) Dangerous Goods Regulations are published by the IATA Dangerous Goods Board pursuant to IATA Resolutions 618 and 619 and constitute a manual of industry carrier regulations to be followed by all IATA Member airlines when transporting hazardous materials.
[IATA. Dangerous Goods Regulations. 40th Ed. Montreal, Canada and Geneva, Switzerland: International Air Transport Association, Dangerous Goods Regulations, 1999. 149]**PEER REVIEWED**

The International Maritime Dangerous Goods Code lays down basic principles for transporting hazardous chemicals. Detailed recommendations for individual substances and a number of recommendations for good practice are included in the classes dealing with such substances. A general index of technical names has also been compiled. This index should always be consulted when attempting to locate the appropriate procedures to be used when shipping any substance or article.
[IMDG; International Maritime Dangerous Goods Code; International Maritime Organization p.3222 (1998)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Storage Conditions:

Outside or detached storage is preferred. Inside storage should be in a standard flammable liquids storage warehouse, room, or cabinet. Separate from oxidizing materials.
[Fire Protection Guide to Hazardous Materials. 12 ed. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association, 1997. 49-65]**PEER REVIEWED**

Temp: ambient; Venting: open (flame arrester) or pressure-vacuum
[U.S. Coast Guard, Department of Transportation. CHRIS - Hazardous Chemical Data. Volume II. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1984-5.]**PEER REVIEWED**

Cleanup Methods:

1) REMOVE ALL IGNITION SOURCES. 2) VENTILATE AREA OF SPILL OR LEAK. 3) FOR SMALL QUANTITIES, ABSORB ON PAPER TOWELS. EVAPORATE IN SAFE PLACE (SUCH AS FUME HOOD). ... BURN PAPER IN SUITABLE LOCATION AWAY FROM COMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS. LARGE QUANTITIES CAN BE COLLECTED & ATOMIZED IN SUITABLE COMBUSTION CHAMBER.
[Mackison, F. W., R. S. Stricoff, and L. J. Partridge, Jr. (eds.). NIOSH/OSHA - Occupational Health Guidelines for Chemical Hazards. DHHS(NIOSH) Publication No. 81-123 (3 VOLS). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, Jan. 1981.1]**PEER REVIEWED**

Land spills should be contained; skimming equipment and/or sorbent (polyurethane) foams can be used. Use of activated carbon is recommended.
[Environment Canada; Tech Info for Problem Spills: Ethylbenzene p.83 (1982)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Water spills should be contained; skimming equipment and/or sorbent (polyurethane) foams can be used to remove the slick. Universal gelling agent can be used to solidify a trapped mass. Use of activated carbon on dissolved portion is recommended.
[Environment Canada; Tech Info for Problem Spills: Ethylbenzene p.83 (1982)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Environmental considerations: Land spill: Dig a pit, pond, lagoon, or holding area to contain liquid or solid material. /SRP: If time permits, pits, ponds, lagoons, soak holes, or holding areas should be sealed with an impermeable flexible membrane liner./ Dike surface flow using sand bags, foamed polyurethane, or foamed concrete. Absorb bulk liquid with fly ash, cement powder, sawdust, or commercial sorbents. Apply "universal" gelling agent to immobilize spill. Apply appropriate foam to diminish vapor and fire hazard.
[Association of American Railroads. Emergency Handling of Hazardous Materials in Surface Transportation. Washington, DC: Association of American Railroads, Bureau of Explosives, 1994.443]**PEER REVIEWED**

Environmental considerations - Air spill: Apply water spray or mist to knock down vapors.
[Association of American Railroads. Emergency Handling of Hazardous Materials in Surface Transportation. Washington, DC: Association of American Railroads, Bureau of Explosives, 1994.443]**PEER REVIEWED**

Environmental considerations: Water spill: Use natural barriers or oil spill control booms to limit spill travel. Use surface active agent (e.g., detergent, soaps, alcohols), if approved by EPA. Inject "universal" gelling agent to solidify encircled spill and increase effectiveness of booms. If dissolved, in region of 10 ppm or greater concentration, apply activated carbon at ten times the spilled amount. Remove trapped material with suction hoses. Use mechanical dredges or lifts to remove immobilized masses of pollutants and precipitates.
[Association of American Railroads. Emergency Handling of Hazardous Materials in Surface Transportation. Washington, DC: Association of American Railroads, Bureau of Explosives, 1994.443]**PEER REVIEWED**

ABSORB IN VERMICULITE, DRY SAND, EARTH OR SIMILAR MATERIAL
[Mackison, F. W., R. S. Stricoff, and L. J. Partridge, Jr. (eds.). NIOSH/OSHA - Occupational Health Guidelines for Chemical Hazards. DHHS(NIOSH) Publication No. 81-123 (3 VOLS). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, Jan. 1981.2]**PEER REVIEWED**

Disposal Methods:

Generators of waste (equal to or greater than 100 kg/mo) containing this contaminant, EPA hazardous waste number F003, must conform with USEPA regulations in storage, transportation, treatment and disposal of waste.
[40 CFR 240-280, 300-306, 702-799 (7/1/90)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Ethylbenzene is a waste chemical stream constituent which may be subjected to ultimate disposal by controlled incineration.
[USEPA; Engineering Handbook for Hazardous Waste Incineration p.2-6 (1981) EPA 68-03-3025]**PEER REVIEWED**

A good candidate for liquid injection incineration at a temperature range of 650 to 1,600 deg C and a residence time of 0.1 to 2 seconds. A good candidate for rotary kiln incineration at a temperature range of 820 to 1,600 deg C and residence times of seconds for liquids and gases, and hours for solids. A good candidate for fluidized bed incineration at a temperature range of 450 to 980 deg C and residence times of seconds for liquids and gases, and longer for solids.
[USEPA; Engineering Handbook for Hazardous Waste Incineration p.3-4 (1981) EPA 68-03-3025]**PEER REVIEWED**

The following wastewater treatment technologies have been investigated for ethylbenzene: Activated Carbon.
[USEPA; Management of Hazardous Waste Leachate, EPA Contract No.68-03-2766 p.E-146 (1982)]**PEER REVIEWED**

The following wastewater treatment technologies have been investigated for ethylbenzene: biological treatment.
[USEPA; Management of Hazardous Waste Leachate, EPA Contract No.68-03-2766 p.E-45 (1982)]**PEER REVIEWED**

The following wastewater treatment technologies have been investigated for ethylbenzene: stripping.
[USEPA; Management of Hazardous Waste Leachate, EPA Contract No.68-03-2766 p.E-96 (1982)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Occupational Exposure Standards:

OSHA Standards:

Permissible Exposure Limit: Table Z-1 8-Hr Time Weighted Avg: 100 ppm (435 mg/cu m).
[29 CFR 1910.1000 (7/1/99)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Vacated 1989 OSHA PEL TWA 100 ppm (435 mg/cu m); STEL 125 ppm (545 mg/cu m) is still enforced in some states.
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997.364]**PEER REVIEWED**

Threshold Limit Values:

8 hr Time Weighted Avg (TWA): 100 ppm; 15 min Short Term Exposure Limit (STEL): 125 ppm.
[American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. TLVs & BEIs: Threshold limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices for 2002. Cincinnati, OH. 2002.31]**QC REVIEWED**

Biological Exposure Index (BEI): Determinant: mandelic acid in urine; Sampling Time: end of shift at end of workweek; BEI: 1.5 g/g creatinine. The determinant is nonspecific, since it is also observed after exposure to other chemicals.
[American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. TLVs & BEIs: Threshold limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices for 2002. Cincinnati, OH. 2002.90]**QC REVIEWED**

Biological Exposure Index (BEI): Determinant: ethyl benzene in end-exhaled air. The biological determinant is an indicator of exposure to the chemical, but the quantitative interpretation of the measurement is ambiguous. These determinants should be used as a screening test if a quantitative test is not practical or as a confirmatory test if the quantitative test is not specific and the origin of the determinant is in question.
[American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. TLVs & BEIs: Threshold limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices for 2002. Cincinnati, OH. 2002.90]**QC REVIEWED**

A3; Confirmed animal carcinogen with unknown relevance to humans.
[American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. TLVs & BEIs: Threshold limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices for 2002. Cincinnati, OH. 2002.31]**QC REVIEWED**

NIOSH Recommendations:

Recommended Exposure Limit: 10 Hr Time-Weighted Avg: 100 ppm (435 mg/cu m).
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997.132]**PEER REVIEWED**

Recommended Exposure Limit: 15 Min Short-Term Exposure Limit: 125 ppm (545 mg/cu m).
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997.132]**PEER REVIEWED**

Immediately Dangerous to Life or Health:

800 ppm
[NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997.132]**PEER REVIEWED**

Other Occupational Permissible Levels:

Australia: 100 ppm, STEL 125 ppm, substance under review (1990); Federal Republic of Germany: 100 ppm, short-term level 200 ppm, 5 min, 8 times per shift, skin (1990); Sweden: 80 ppm, short-term value 100 ppm, 15 min (1989); United Kingdom: 100 ppm, 10-min STEL 125 ppm (1991).
[American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Inc. Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices. 6th ed. Volumes I, II, III. Cincinnati, OH: ACGIH, 1991.584]**PEER REVIEWED**

Manufacturing/Use Information:

Major Uses:

USED IN ... THE PRODUCTION OF SYNTHETIC RUBBER ... AS A SOLVENT OR DILUENT, A COMPONENT OF AUTOMOTIVE AND AVIATION FUELS; MFR OF CELLULOSE ACETATE
[International Labour Office. Encyclopedia of Occupational Health and Safety. Vols. I&II. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Office, 1983.2114]**PEER REVIEWED**

Ethylbenzene is mainly used as a precursor to styrene.
[Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology. 4th ed. Volumes 1: New York, NY. John Wiley and Sons, 1991-Present.V2 84]**PEER REVIEWED**

... SOLVENT-EG, FOR ALKYD SURFACE COATINGS, CHEM INT FOR DIETHYLBENZENE & ACETOPHENONE, FOR ETHYL ANTHRAQUINONE, FOR ETHYLBENZENE SULFONIC ACIDS (O-, M- & P-), FOR PROPYLENE OXIDE & ALPHA-METHYLBENZYL ALCOHOL, UNRECOVERED COMPONENT OF GASOLINE
[SRI]**PEER REVIEWED**

Used as an intermediate for the manufacture of the styrene monomer and as a resin solvent.
[Budavari, S. (ed.). The Merck Index - An Encyclopedia of Chemicals, Drugs, and Biologicals. Whitehouse Station, NJ: Merck and Co., Inc., 1996.643]**PEER REVIEWED**

Intermediate for the production of diethylbenzene and acetophenone.
[Gerhartz, W. (exec ed.). Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. 5th ed.Vol A1: Deerfield Beach, FL: VCH Publishers, 1985 to Present.VA10 35]**PEER REVIEWED**

Used as a component of automotive and aviation fuels.
[Clayton, G.D., F.E. Clayton (eds.) Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology. Volumes 2A, 2B, 2C, 2D, 2E, 2F: Toxicology. 4th ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1993-1994.1342]**PEER REVIEWED**

Intermediate in production of styrene solvent.
[Lewis, R.J., Sr (Ed.). Hawley's Condensed Chemical Dictionary. 13th ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1997. 461]**PEER REVIEWED**

Manufacturers:

Amoco Corporation, Hq, 200 East Randolph Drive, Chicago, IL 60601, (312) 856-6111; Subsidiary: Amoco Chemical Company (address same as Hq), (312) 856-3200; Chemical & Specialty Product Group; Production site: Texas City, TX 77592
[SRI. 1998 Directory of Chemical Producers -United States of America. SRI International, Menlo Park, CA. 1998.593]**PEER REVIEWED**

ARCO Chemical Co., Hq, 3801 W. Chester Pk., Newtown Square, PA 19073; Production site: Channelview, TX 77530
[SRI. 1998 Directory of Chemical Producers -United States of America. SRI International, Menlo Park, CA. 1998.583]**PEER REVIEWED**

Chevron Chemical Co., 6001 Bollinger Canyon Rd., San Ramon, CA 94583, (925) 842-5500; Production site: St. James, LA 70086
[SRI. 1998 Directory of Chemical Producers -United States of America. SRI International, Menlo Park, CA. 1998.593]**PEER REVIEWED**

Cos-Mar, Inc., Hq, PO Box 11, Carville, LA 70721, (504) 642-5454; Production site: Carville, LA 70721
[SRI. 1998 Directory of Chemical Producers -United States of America. SRI International, Menlo Park, CA. 1998.593]**PEER REVIEWED**

Dow Chemical USA, Hq, 2020 Dow Center, Midland, MI 48674, (517) 636-1000; Production site: Freeport, TX 77541
[SRI. 1998 Directory of Chemical Producers -United States of America. SRI International, Menlo Park, CA. 1998.593]**PEER REVIEWED**

Huntsman Corp., 3040 Post Oak Blvd., Houston, TX 77056, (713) 235-6000; Production site: Odessa, TX 79760
[SRI. 1998 Directory of Chemical Producers -United States of America. SRI International, Menlo Park, CA. 1998.593]**PEER REVIEWED**

Sterling Chemicals, Inc., Hq, 333 Clay St., Suite 3700, Houston, TX 77002, (713) 650-3700; Production site: Texas City, TX 77590
[SRI. 1998 Directory of Chemical Producers -United States of America. SRI International, Menlo Park, CA. 1998.593]**PEER REVIEWED**

Westlake Styrene Corp., 2801 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 200, Houston, TX 77056, (713) 877-1924; Production site: Lake Charles, LA 70602-3089
[SRI. 1998 Directory of Chemical Producers -United States of America. SRI International, Menlo Park, CA. 1998.593]**PEER REVIEWED**

Methods of Manufacturing:

Prepared by dehydrogenation of naphthenes or from catalytic cyclization and aromatization.
[Clayton, G.D., F.E. Clayton (eds.) Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology. Volumes 2A, 2B, 2C, 2D, 2E, 2F: Toxicology. 4th ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1993-1994.1342]**PEER REVIEWED**

ALKYLATION OF BENZENE WITH ETHYLENE IN LIQUID PHASE USING ALUMINUM CHLORIDE CATALYST OR IN VAPOR PHASE USING PHOSPHORIC ACID OR ALUMINA-SILICA CATALYST; RECOVERY FROM MIXED XYLENES VIA FRACTIONATION
[SRI]**PEER REVIEWED**

Prepd from acetophenone
[Budavari, S. (ed.). The Merck Index - An Encyclopedia of Chemicals, Drugs, and Biologicals. Whitehouse Station, NJ: Merck and Co., Inc., 1996.643]**PEER REVIEWED**

Produced by alkylation of benzene with ethylene using acidic catalysts and can be carried out in the liquid or vapor phase.
[Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology. 4th ed. Volumes 1: New York, NY. John Wiley and Sons, 1991-Present.V22 957]**PEER REVIEWED**

Produced via the use of zeolite catalyst, ZSM-5, in a process called the Mobil-Badger vapor phase ethylbenzene process.
[Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology. 4th ed. Volumes 1: New York, NY. John Wiley and Sons, 1991-Present.V22 961]**PEER REVIEWED**

(1) By heating benzene and ethylene in the presence of aluminum chloride, with subsequent distillation; (2) by fractionation directly from the mixed xylene stream in petroleum refining.
[Lewis, R.J., Sr (Ed.). Hawley's Condensed Chemical Dictionary. 13th ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1997. 461]**PEER REVIEWED**

General Manufacturing Information:

In most processes, ethylbenzene is not recovered because of high energy costs.
[Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology. 3rd ed., Volumes 1-26. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, 1978-1984.V24 717 (1983)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Ethylbenzene is recovered from benzene-toluene-xylene (BTX) processing.
[Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology. 3rd ed., Volumes 1-26. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, 1978-1984.V4 64 (1978)]**PEER REVIEWED**

19th-highest-volume chemical produced in the U.S. (1995).
[Lewis, R.J., Sr (Ed.). Hawley's Condensed Chemical Dictionary. 13th ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1997. 461]**PEER REVIEWED**

Formulations/Preparations:

GRADE: TECHNICAL 99.0%; PURE 99.5%; RESEARCH 99.98%.
[U.S. Coast Guard, Department of Transportation. CHRIS - Hazardous Chemical Data. Volume II. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1984-5.]**PEER REVIEWED**

Grade: Technical, pure, research
[Lewis, R.J., Sr (Ed.). Hawley's Condensed Chemical Dictionary. 13th ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1997. 461]**PEER REVIEWED**

Consumption Patterns:

Intermediate for styrene monomer production, more than 99%; the remainder is exported or sold as solvent (1984).
[CHEMICAL PROFILE: Ethylbenzene, 1984]**PEER REVIEWED**

Styrene, 97%; Miscellaneous, 3% (1983) /Estimate/
[CHEMICAL PRODUCTS SYNOPSIS: Ethylbenzene, 1983]**PEER REVIEWED**

CHEMICAL PROFILE: Ethylbenzene. Intermediate for styrene monomer production, over 99%. The remainder is used in solvent applications.
[Kavaler AR; Chemical Marketing Reporter 236 (8): 50 (1989)]**PEER REVIEWED**

CHEMICAL PROFILE: Ethylbenzene. Demand: 1988: 9,935 million lb; 1989: 10,230 million lb; 1993 /projected/: 11,500 million lb. (Imports and exports are both minor, each one on the order of 200 million lb.)
[Kavaler AR; Chemical Marketing Reporter 236 (8): 50 (1989)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Precursors for styrene production, more than 99 percent. The remainder is used in solvent applications.
[Chemical Marketing Reporter; Chemical Profile Ethylbenzene. April 27, 1998. p. 57. NY,NY: Schnell Pub Co (1998)]**PEER REVIEWED**

U. S. Production:

(1977) 8.3X10+9 lb
[United States International Trade Commission. Synthetic Organic Chemicals-- United States Production and Sales, 1981. USITC Publications 1291 Washington, DC: United States International Trade Commission, 1981.27]**PEER REVIEWED**

(1980) 3.5 x 10+12 g
[Kavaler, A.R. (ed.). Chemical Marketing Reporter. New York, NY: Schnell Publishing Co., Inc., 1984]**PEER REVIEWED**

(1981) 3.5 x 10+12 g
[Kavaler, A.R. (ed.). Chemical Marketing Reporter. New York, NY: Schnell Publishing Co., Inc., 1984]**PEER REVIEWED**

(1977) 3.77X10+12 G
[SRI]**PEER REVIEWED**

(1982) 3.15X10+12 G
[SRI]**PEER REVIEWED**

(1985) 3.35X10+12 g
[USITC, SYN ORG CHEM-US PROD/SALES (1985) p.29]**PEER REVIEWED**

(1988) 9.9X10+9 lb
[United States International Trade Commission. Synthetic Organic Chemicals- United States Production and Sales, 1988. USITC Publication 1989. Washington, DC: United States International Trade Commission, 1989.3-2]**PEER REVIEWED**

(1990) 8.37 billion lb
[Chem & Engineering News 70 (15): 17 (4/13/92)]**PEER REVIEWED**

(1991) 8.87 billion lb
[Chem & Engineering News 71 (15): 11 (4/12/93)]**PEER REVIEWED**

(1992) 11.11 billion lb
[Chem & Engineering News 72 (15): 13 (4/11/94)]**PEER REVIEWED**

(1993) 11.76 billion lb
[Chem & Engineering News 72 (15): 13 (4/11/94)]**PEER REVIEWED**

(1993) 4,233,835 kg
[United States International Trade Commission. Synthetic Organic Chemicals - United States Production and Sales, 1993. USITC Publication 2810, Nov. 1994. Washington, D.C.3-15]**PEER REVIEWED**

1997: 12.9 billion pounds; 1998 13 billion pounds; 2002 15 billion pounds. (Includes exports, which amounted to 126 million pounds in 1996, but not imports which totaled 16 million pounds in that year).
[Chemical Marketing Reporter; Chemical Profile Ethylbenzene. April 27, 1998. p. 57. NY,NY: Schnell Pub Co (1998)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Growth: Historical (1988-1997): 2.5 percent per year; future: 3 percent per year through 2002.
[Chemical Marketing Reporter; Chemical Profile Ethylbenzene. April 27, 1998. p. 57. NY,NY: Schnell Pub Co (1998)]**PEER REVIEWED**

U. S. Imports:

(1978) 1.53X10+10 G
[SRI]**PEER REVIEWED**

(1981) 2.09X10+10 G
[SRI]**PEER REVIEWED**

US General Imports entered under schedule 4, pt 1B, of the TSUS (1983). Quantity of ethylbenzene: 87,201,615 lbs.
[USITC. IMPORTS OF BENZENOID CHEM & PROD (1983) p.18]**PEER REVIEWED**

(1996) 16 million pounds
[Chemical Marketing Reporter; Chemical Profile Ethylbenzene. April 27, 1998. p. 57. NY,NY: Schnell Pub Co (1998)]**PEER REVIEWED**

U. S. Exports:

(1978) 8.59X10+10 G
[SRI]**PEER REVIEWED**

(1983) 4.84X10+10 G
[SRI]**PEER REVIEWED**

(1985) 7.49X10+10 g
[BUREAU OF THE CENSUS, US EXPORTS, SCHEDULE E, (1985) p.2-69]**PEER REVIEWED**

(1996) 126 million pounds
[Chemical Marketing Reporter; Chemical Profile Ethylbenzene. April 27, 1998. p. 57. NY,NY: Schnell Pub Co (1998)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Laboratory Methods:

Clinical Laboratory Methods:

IN BLOOD BY ULTRAVIOLET-SPECTROPHOTOMETRIC METHOD.
[Browning, E. Toxicity and Metabolism of Industrial Solvents. New York: American Elsevier, 1965.91]**PEER REVIEWED**

An automated high performance liquid chromatographic method for the direct determination of urinary concentrations of phenyl glyoxylic acid and mandelic acid, metabolites of styrene or ethylbenzene, is described. The method is simple and specific. Urine can be analyzed without solvent extraction. Analysis can be performed satisfactorily within 15 minutes for samples containing hippuric acid, o-, m- and p-methyl hippuric acids, phenyl glyoxylic acid, and mandelic acid, and within 15 minutes for those containing hippuric acid, phenyl glyoxylic acid and mandelic acid.
[Ogata M, Taguchi T; Int Arch Occup Environ Health 59 (3): 263-72 (1987)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Analytic Laboratory Methods:

EPA Method 624. Purge-and-Trap Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry for the analysis of purgeable organics including ethylbenzene in the municipal and industrial discharges. Under the prescribed conditions, for ethylbenzene the method has a detection limit of 7.2 ug/l. Precision and method accuracy were found to be directly related to the concentration of the analyte and essentially independent of the sample matrix.
[40 CFR 136 (7/1/91)]**PEER REVIEWED**

EPA Method 1624. Isotope Dilution Purge-and-Trap Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry. This method is applicable for the determination of volatile organic compounds in municpal and industrial discharges. By adding a known amount of a labeled compound to every sample prior to purging, a correction of recovery of the pollutant can be made. If labeled compounds are not available, an internal standard method is used. Under the prescribed conditions, for both the labeled, and unlabeled ethylbenzene the method has a minimum detection level 10 ug/l.The established acceptance performance criteria at 20 ug/l is 9.6 ug/l for the standard deviation of the recovery, with the average recovery of 15.6 to 28.5 ug/l and the labeled cmpd recovery ranging from below detection to 203%.
[40 CFR 136 (7/1/91)]**PEER REVIEWED**

EPA Method 602. Purge-and-Trap Gas Chromatography with photoionization detection for the determination of purgeable aromatics including ethylbenzene in municipal and industrial discharges. Under the prescribed conditionss for ethylbenzene the detection limit is 0.2 ug/l. The method is applicable for use in the concentration range from the method detection limit to times that limit. Precision and method accuracy were found to be directly related to the concentration of the analyte essentially independent of the sample matrix.
[40 CFR 136 (7/1/91)]**PEER REVIEWED**

EPA Method 524.2. Purge-and-Trap Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry for the determination of volatile aromatic compounds in water including finished drinking water, raw source water, and drinking water in any treatment stage. For ethylbenzene the method has a detection limit of 0.06 ug/l and a relative standard deviation of 8.6% with a wide bore capillary column, and a method detection limit of 0.03 ug/l and a relative standard deviation of 5.3% with a narrow bore capillary column.
[USEPA; Methods for the Determinatioon of Organic Compounds in Finished Drinking Water and Raw Source Water (19860]**PEER REVIEWED**

EPA Method 503.1. Purge-and-Trap Gas Chromatography with a Photoionization Detector. The method is applicable for the determination of volatile aromatic and unsaturated organic compounds in finished drinking water, raw source water, or drinking water in any treatment stage. For ethylbenzene the method has a detection limit of 0.002 ug/l and a relative standard deviation of 8.5%. Overall precision and method accuracy were found to be directly related to the concentration of the analyte essentially independent of sample matrix.
[USEPA; Methods for the Determination of Organic Compouds in Finished Drinking Water and Raw Source Water (1986)]**PEER REVIEWED**

EPA Method 502.2: Purge-and-Trap Capillary Column Gas Chromatography with Photoionization and Electrolytic Conductivity Detectors in Series. The method is applicable for the determination of volatile organic compounds in finished drinking water, raw source water, or drinking water in any treatment stage. For ethylbenzene the method has a detection limit of 0.005 ug/l, a percent recovery of 101%, and a standard deviation of 1.4 using the photoionization detector; and there is no data given for the following: the method detection limit, a percent recovery, or the standard deviation of recovery using the electrolytic conductivity detector.
[USEPA; Methods for the Determination of Organic Compounds in Finished Drinking Water and Raw Source Water (1986)]**PEER REVIEWED**

NIOSH Method 1501. Determination of Aromatic Hydrocarbons by Gas Chromatography with Flame Ionization Detection.
[U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods. 4th ed. Methods A-Z & Supplements. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, Aug 1994.]**PEER REVIEWED**

EPA Method 8240. Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry for the determination of volatile organics. This method can be used to quantify most volatile organic compounds including ethylbenzene that have boiling points below 200 deg C and are insoluble or slightly soluble in water. The detection limit is not given. Precision and method accuracy were found to be directly related to the concentration of the analyte and essentially independent of the sample matrix.
[USEPA/Office of Solid Waste (OSW); Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods SW846 Methods (1986)]**PEER REVIEWED**

EPA Method 8260. Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry for the determination of volatile organic compounds. This method can be used to quantitate most volatile organic compounds including ethylbenzene that have boiling points below 200 deg C and are insoluble or slightly soluble in water. Under the prescribed conditions for ethylbenzene, the method has a detection limit of 0.06 ug/l, a percent recovery of 99%, and a percent relative standard deviation of 8.6% using a wide bore capillary column; and a detection limit of 0.03 ug/l, a percent recovery of 99%, and a percent relative standard deviation of 5.3% using a narrow bore capillary column.
[USEPA/Office of Solid Waste (OSW); Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods SW846 Methods (1986)]**PEER REVIEWED**

OSW Method 8240B. Determination of Volatile Organics Compounds by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS).
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC#4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

OSW Method 5021. Volatile Organic Compounds in Soils and Other Solid Matrices Using Equilibrium Headspace Analysis.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC#4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

OSW Method 8020A. Determination of Aromatic Volatile Organics by Gas Chromatography.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC#4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

OSW Method 8021A. Analysis of Halogenated and Aromatic Volatiles By Gas Chromatography using Electrolytic Conductivity and Photoionization Detectors in Series: Capillary Column Technique.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC#4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

OSW Method 8021A. Halogenated and Aromatic Volatiles By Gas chromatography using Electrolytic Conductivity and Photoionization Detectors in Series: Capillary Technique.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC#4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

OSW Method 8240B. Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS).
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC#4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

OSW Method 8260A. Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS): Capillary Column Technique.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC#4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

OSW Method 8260B. Volatile Organic Compounds by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS): Capillary Column Technique.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC#4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

OSW Method 5041. Analysis of Sorbent Cartridges From Volatile Organic Sampling Train by using the Wide-Bore Capillary Column Technique.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC#4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

OSW Method 5041A. Protocol for Desorption of Sorbent Cartridges from Volatile Organic Sampling Train (VOST): Wide-Bore Capillary GC/MS Technique.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC#4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

AOB Method OA-002-1. Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS Analysis of Tenax/CMS Cartridge and Summa Canister Samples.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC#4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

AOB Method VA-001-1. Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air Sampled by Sorbent Tubes and Analyzed by Purge and Trap GC.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC#4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

AOB Method VA-003-1. Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air by Portable GC/PID.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC#4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

AOB Method VA-005-1. Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Ambient Air by Purge and Trap Gas Chromatography.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC#4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

AOB Method VA-006-1. Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Ambient Air by Direct Portable GC/PID.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC#4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

AOB Method VA-008-1. Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Ambient Air by Portable GC/PID with Direct Sampling via Pump and Sample Loop.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC#4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

AOB Method VG-001-1. Volatile Organics in Soil Gas - Adsorbent Tube Method.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC#4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

AOB Method VG-006-1. Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Ambient Air by Purge and Trap GC.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC#4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

AOB Method VG-007-1. Halogenated and Aromatic Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air and Soil Gas Sampled by Sorbent Tubes and Analyzed by Purge and Trap GC/ELCD/PID.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC#4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

AOB Method VG-008-1. Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Soil Gas sampled by Tenax Tubes and Analyzed by Thermal Desorption GC/PID/ELCD.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC#4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

AOB Method VG-010-1. Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Soil Gas by Direct Portable GC.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC#4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

AOB Method VG-011-1. Halogenated and Aromatic Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Whole Gas Analyzed by Purge and Trap GC/ELCD/PID.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC#4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

AOB Method VW-001-1. Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Water by Purge and Trap GC/PID/ELCD.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC#4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

AOB Method VW-002-1. Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Water by Automated Headspace GC/PID/ELCD.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC#4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

AOB Method VW-003-1. Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Water by Automated Headspace GC/PID/ELCD (Internal Standard).
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC#4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

AOB Method VW-004-1. Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Water by Manual Headspace Portable GC/PID.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC#4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

AOB Method VW-008-1. Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Water by Purge and Trap GC.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC#4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

AOB Method VW-010-1. Field Screening for Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Water and Soil by Headspace GC/PID (Photovac 10S10).
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC#4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

AOB Method VW-014-1. Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Water by Purge and Trap GC/PID/ELCD.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC#4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

AOB Method VS-001-1. Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Soil by Purge and Trap GC/PID/ELC.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC#4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

AOB Method VS-002-1. Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Soil and Sediment by Automated Headspace GC/PID/ELCD.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC#4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

AOB Method VW-010-1. Field Screening for Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Water and Soil by Headspace GC/PID (Photovac 10S10).
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC#4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

CLP Method LC_VOA. Analysis of Water for Low concn Volatile Organic Compounds by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC#4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

CLP Method MC_VOA. Analysis of Volatile Organics in Multi-Concentration Water Samples by Gas Chromatography with a Mass Spectrometer.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC#4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

CLP Method MC_VOA. Analysis of Volatile Organics in Low concn Soil Samples by Gas Chromatography with a Mass Spectrometer.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC#4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

CLP Method MC_VOA. Analysis of Volatile Organics in Medium concn Soil Samples by Gas Chromatography with a Mass Spectrometer.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC#4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

DOE Method OS040. Rapid Determination Of Volatile Organic Contaminants in Water and Soils by Direct Purge Mass Spectrometry.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC#4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

DOE Method OS040. Rapid Determination Of Volatile Organic Contaminants in Water and Soils by Direct Purge Mass Spectrometry.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC#4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

DOE Method OS060. Immunoassay for Petroleum Fuel Hydrocarbons in Soil.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC#4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

EAD Method 1624. Volatile Organic Compounds by Isotope Dilution GCMS.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC#4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

EAD Method 1624. Volatile Organic Compounds by Isotope Dilution GCMS.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC#4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

EMSLC Method 502.2. Volatile Organic Compounds in Water by Purge and Trap Capillary Column Gas Chromatography with Photoionization and Electrolytic Conductivity Detectors in Series.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC#4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

EMSLC Method 503.1. Volatile Aromatic and Unsaturated Organic Compounds in Water by Purge and Trap Gas Chromatography.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC#4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

EMSLC Method 524.1. Measurement of Purgeable Organic Compounds in Water by Packed Column Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC#4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

EMSLC Method 524.2 Measurement of Purgeable Organic Compounds in Water by Capillary Column Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC#4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

EMSLC Method 602. Purgeable Aromatics in Wastewater by Gas Chromatography with Photoionization Detection.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC#4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

EMSLC Method 624. Protocol for the Analysis of Purgeable Organic Priority Pollutants in Industrial and Municipal Wastewater.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC#4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

EMSLC Method 624-S. Analysis of Purgeable Organic Priority Pollutants in Industrial and Municipal Wastewater Treatment Sludge.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC#4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

SFSAS Method SFSAS_7. Determination of Purgeable Organics in Sediment.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC#4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

AOB Method VS-006-1. Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Soil and Water by Purge and Trap GC.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC#4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

AOB Method VW-011-1. Field Screening for Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Water and Soil by Purge and Trap GC/PID/ELCD.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC#4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

CLP Method OHC. Organics Analysis, Multi-Media, High-Concentration.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC#4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

SFSAS Method SFSAS_29. Extraction and Analysis of Organics in Biological Tissue.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC#4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

SFSAS Method SFSAS_5. Analysis of Fish for Volatile Organics by Purge and Trap Analysis.
[USEPA; EMMI. EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index. Version 1.1. PC#4082. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes (1997)]**PEER REVIEWED**

Sampling Procedures:

AIR SAMPLES WERE COLLECTED IN TEFLON LOOP (3.0 ML).
[IMAMURA K ET AL; BUNSEKI KAGAKU 28 (9): 549 (1979)]**PEER REVIEWED**

NIOSH Method 1501. Analyte: Ethylbenzene. Matrix: Air. Sampler: Solid sorbent tube (coconut shell charcoal, 100 mg/50 mg). Flow Rate: less or equal to 0.2 l/min. Sample Size: 10-24 liters. Shipment: no special specifications. Sample Stability: not determined.
[U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service. Centers for Disease Control, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods, 3rd ed. Volumes 1 and 2 with 1985 supplement, and revisions. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, February 1984.1501-1]**PEER REVIEWED**

Special References:

Special Reports:

HALEY TJ, A REVIEW OF LITERATURE ON ETHYLBENZENE; DANGEROUS PROP IND MATER REP 1(6) 2 (1981). A REVIEW WITH 39 REFERENCES ON CHEMISTRY, METABOLISM, PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICITY OF ETHYLBENZENE.

USEPA; Ambient Water Quality Criteria Document: Ethylbenzene (1980) EPA No. 440/5-8-048.

Environment Canada; Tech Info for Problem Spills: Ethylbenzene (Draft) (1982)

Fishbein L; Ethylbenzene in An Overview of Environmental and Toxicological Aspects of Aromatic Hydrocarbons; Sci Total Environ 44 (3): 269-88 (1985)

Forrest RG et al; Hazardous Mater Spills Conference Proc, Prev, Behav, Control Cleanup Spills Waste Sites (1984) 17-23

Chemical Review: Ethylbenzene; Dangerous Prop Ind Mater Rep 7 (2): 13-35 (1987)

DHHS/ATSDR; Toxicological Profile for Ethylbenzene (1990) ATSDR/TP-90/15

USEPA/ECAO; Ambient Water Quality Criteria Document: Addendum for Ethylbenzene. Final Draft (12/89) ECAO Pub. ECAO-CIN-647

DHHS/NTP; NTP Report on the Toxicity Studies of Ethylbenzene in F344/N Rats and B6C3F1 Mice (Inhalation Studies) NTP Tox 10 (1992)

Toxicology & Carcinogenesis Studies of Ethylbenzene in F344/N Rats and B6C3F1 Mice p.5 Technical Report Series No. 466 (1999) NIH Publication No. 99-3956 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709

Synonyms and Identifiers:

Synonyms:

AETHYLBENZOL (GERMAN)
**PEER REVIEWED**

BENZENE, ETHYL-
**PEER REVIEWED**

EB
**PEER REVIEWED**

ETHYLBENZEEN (DUTCH)
**PEER REVIEWED**

ETHYL BENZENE
**PEER REVIEWED**

ETHYLBENZOL
**PEER REVIEWED**

ETILBENZENE (ITALIAN)
**PEER REVIEWED**

ETYLOBENZEN (POLISH)
**PEER REVIEWED**

NCI-C56393
**PEER REVIEWED**

PHENYLETHANE
**PEER REVIEWED**

Formulations/Preparations:

GRADE: TECHNICAL 99.0%; PURE 99.5%; RESEARCH 99.98%.
[U.S. Coast Guard, Department of Transportation. CHRIS - Hazardous Chemical Data. Volume II. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1984-5.]**PEER REVIEWED**

Grade: Technical, pure, research
[Lewis, R.J., Sr (Ed.). Hawley's Condensed Chemical Dictionary. 13th ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1997. 461]**PEER REVIEWED**

Shipping Name/ Number DOT/UN/NA/IMO:

UN 1175; Ethylbenzene

IMO 3.2; Ethylbenzene

Standard Transportation Number:

49 091 63; Ethylbenzene

EPA Hazardous Waste Number:

F003; A hazardous waste from nonspecific sources when a spent solvent.

Administrative Information:

Hazardous Substances Databank Number: 84
Last Revision Date: 20030305
Last Review Date: Reviewed by SRP on 1/29/2000

Update History:

Complete Update on 03/05/2003, 5 fields added/edited/deleted.
Field Update on 11/08/2002, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Field Update on 10/31/2002, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 01/14/2002, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 08/09/2001, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 01/30/2001, 2 fields added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 09/12/2000, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 08/04/2000, 91 fields added/edited/deleted.
Field Update on 02/08/2000, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Field Update on 02/02/2000, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Field Update on 11/18/1999, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Field Update on 09/21/1999, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Field Update on 08/24/1999, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 03/29/1999, 3 fields added/edited/deleted.
Field Update on 03/19/1999, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Field Update on 03/17/1999, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 02/24/1999, 2 fields added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 01/20/1999, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 11/12/1998, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 09/03/1998, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 06/02/1998, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 02/25/1998, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 10/17/1997, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 03/27/1997, 2 fields added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 02/26/1997, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 02/25/1997, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 10/12/1996, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 05/14/1996, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 05/10/1996, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 04/18/1996, 2 fields added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 04/16/1996, 7 fields added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 01/18/1996, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 10/19/1995, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 05/26/1995, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 01/20/1995, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 12/19/1994, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 08/31/1994, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 08/24/1994, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 08/19/1994, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 07/25/1994, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 06/08/1994, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 05/05/1994, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 03/25/1994, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 08/20/1993, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 08/10/1993, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 08/07/1993, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 08/04/1993, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 04/30/1993, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 02/05/1993, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Field update on 12/10/1992, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 09/14/1992, 72 fields added/edited/deleted.
Field Update on 09/04/1992, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Field Update on 09/04/1992, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 08/17/1992, 72 fields added/edited/deleted.
Field Update on 07/29/1992, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Field Update on 05/29/1992, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Field Update on 04/16/1992, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Field Update on 01/13/1992, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Field Update on 09/12/1991, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Field Update on 09/10/1991, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Field Update on 09/10/1991, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 07/09/1991, 2 fields added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 10/10/1990, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 04/16/1990, 2 fields added/edited/deleted.
Field update on 03/06/1990, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 01/11/1990, 4 fields added/edited/deleted.
Field Update on 05/05/1989, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 12/09/1988, 2 fields added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 09/23/1988, 1 field added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 08/15/1988, 104 fields added/edited/deleted.
Complete Update on 10/03/1986

GLCC RELATED TOXIC SUBSTANCES FOUND IN THE CAMP POND AND CAMP WATER WELL 2003 AND 2004

GREAT LAKES CHEMICAL CORPORATION AND THE PATHFINDERS CAMP